Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015TA0091

    Case T-91/15: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — AEDEC v Commission (Technological research and development — ‘Horizon 2020’ framework programme for research and innovation — Calls for proposals in respect of work programmes 2014-2015 — Commission decision declaring the proposal submitted by the applicant ineligible — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Proportionality — Openness — Manifest error of assessment)

    IO C 402, 31.10.2016, p. 41–41 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    31.10.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 402/41


    Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — AEDEC v Commission

    (Case T-91/15) (1)

    ((Technological research and development - ‘Horizon 2020’ framework programme for research and innovation - Calls for proposals in respect of work programmes 2014-2015 - Commission decision declaring the proposal submitted by the applicant ineligible - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Proportionality - Openness - Manifest error of assessment))

    (2016/C 402/46)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Asociación Española para el Desarrollo de la Epidemiología Clínica (AEDEC) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. López López, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Ruiz García and M. Siekierzyńska, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision of 4 September 2014 in which the Commission rejected the request for financing submitted by the applicant on behalf of the consortium Latin Plan.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders the Asociación Española para el Desarrollo de la Epidemiología Clínica (AEDEC) to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.


    Top