This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010CN0488
Case C-488/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Alicante (Spain) lodged on 11 October 2010 — Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional S.A. v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamientos S.L.
Case C-488/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Alicante (Spain) lodged on 11 October 2010 — Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional S.A. v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamientos S.L.
Case C-488/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Alicante (Spain) lodged on 11 October 2010 — Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional S.A. v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamientos S.L.
IO C 346, 18.12.2010, p. 33–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 11/10/2010
- Author:
- An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Spáinnis
- Type of procedure:
- Tarchur le haghaidh réamhrialú
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- request for interpretation 32002R0006 airteagal 19 1
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
18.12.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 346/33 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Alicante (Spain) lodged on 11 October 2010 — Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional S.A. v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamientos S.L.
(Case C-488/10)
()
2010/C 346/56
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Juzgado de lo Mercantil
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional S.A.
Defendant: Proyectos Integrales de Balizamientos S.L.
Questions referred
|
1. |
In proceedings for infringement of the exclusive right conferred by a registered Community design, does the right to prevent the use thereof by third parties provided for in Article 19(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 (1) of 12 December 2001 on Community designs extend to any third party who uses another design that does not produce on informed users a different overall impression or, on the contrary, is a third party who uses a subsequent Community design registered in his name excluded until such time as that design is declared invalid? |
|
2. |
Is the answer to the first question unconnected with the intention of the third party or does it depend on his conduct, a decisive point being whether the third party applied for and registered the later Community design after receiving an extra-judicial demand from the proprietor of the earlier Community design calling on him to cease marketing the product on the ground that it infringes rights deriving from that earlier design? |
