Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TA0800

    Case T-800/14: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Philip Morris v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents drawn up in the context of the preparatory works leading to the adoption of the directive on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of legal advice — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process — Rights of the defence — Overriding public interest)

    OJ C 402, 31.10.2016, p. 39–40 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    31.10.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 402/39


    Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Philip Morris v Commission

    (Case T-800/14) (1)

    ((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents drawn up in the context of the preparatory works leading to the adoption of the directive on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products - Refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of legal advice - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process - Rights of the defence - Overriding public interest))

    (2016/C 402/44)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Philip Morris Ltd (Richmond, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Nordlander and M. Abenhaïm, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision Ares(2014) 3388066 of 29 September 2014, in so far as it refuses to grant the applicant full access to the requested documents, with the exception of the redacted personal data contained therein.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Philip Morris Ltd to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 56, 16.2.2015.


    Top