This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32008D0232
2008/232/EC: Commission Decision of 21 February 2008 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the rolling stock sub-system of the trans-European high-speed rail system (notified under document number C(2008) 648) (Text with EEA relevance)
2008/232/KE: Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni ta' 21 ta’ Frar 2008 dwar speċifikazzjoni teknika għall-interoperabbiltà (STI) rigward is-subsistema vetturi ferrovjarji tas-sistema ferrovjarja tranżEwropea ta’ veloċità għolja (notifikata taħt id-dokument numru C(2008) 648) (Test b'rilevanza għaż-ŻEE)
2008/232/KE: Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni ta' 21 ta’ Frar 2008 dwar speċifikazzjoni teknika għall-interoperabbiltà (STI) rigward is-subsistema vetturi ferrovjarji tas-sistema ferrovjarja tranżEwropea ta’ veloċità għolja (notifikata taħt id-dokument numru C(2008) 648) (Test b'rilevanza għaż-ŻEE)
ĠU L 84, 26.3.2008, p. 132–392
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV) Dan id-dokument ġie ppubblikat f’edizzjoni(jiet) speċjali
(HR)
No longer in force, Date of end of validity: 31/12/2014; Imħassar b' 32014R1302
26.3.2008 |
MT |
Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea |
L 84/132 |
DEĊIŻJONI TAL-KUMMISSJONI
ta' 21 ta’ Frar 2008
dwar speċifikazzjoni teknika għall-interoperabbiltà (STI) rigward is-subsistema “vetturi ferrovjarji” tas-sistema ferrovjarja tranżEwropea ta’ veloċità għolja
(notifikata taħt id-dokument numru C(2008) 648)
(Test b'rilevanza għaż-ŻEE)
(2008/232/KE)
IL-KUMMISSJONI TAL-KOMUNITAJIET EWROPEJ,
Wara li kkunsidrat it-Trattat li jistabbilixxi l-Komunità Ewropea,
Wara li kkunsidrat id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 96/48/KE tat-23 ta’Lulju 1996 dwar l-interoperabbiltà tas-sistema ferrovjarja trans-Ewropea ta’ veloċità għolja (1), u b'mod partikolari l-Artikolu 6(1) tagħha,
Billi:
(1) |
F’konformità ma’ l-Artikolu 2(c) u l-Anness II għad-Direttiva 96/48/KE, is-sistema ferrovjarja trans-Ewropea ta’ veloċità għolja tinqasam f'subsistemi strutturali u funzjonali, inkluża subsistema ta' vetturi ferrovjarji. |
(2) |
Id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 2002/735/KE (2) stabbiliet l-ewwel speċifikazzjoni teknika għall-interoperabbiltà (STI) rigward is-subsistema “vetturi ferrovjarji” tas-sistema ferrovjarja trans-Ewropea ta’ veloċità għolja. |
(3) |
Jeħtieġ li l-ewwel STI tiġi riveduta fid-dawl tal-progress tekniku u l-esperjenza li nkisbet mill-implimentazzjoni tagħha. |
(4) |
L-AEIF, bħala korp rappreżentattiv konġunt, ingħata l-mandat li jeżamina u jirrevedi dik l-ewwel STI. Id-Deċiżjoni 2002/735/KE għandha għaldaqstant tinbidel b'din id-Deċiżjoni. |
(5) |
L-abbozz ta' l-STI riveduta ġie eżaminat mill-Kumitat li twaqqaf bid-Direttiva 96/48/KE. |
(6) |
Din l-STI għandha tapplika għal vetturi ferrovjarji ġodda jew aġġornati jew rinnovati, taħt ċerti kundizzjonijiet. |
(7) |
Din l-STI hija bla ħsara għad-dispożizzjonijiet ta' l-STI rilevanti l-oħra li jistgħu jkunu applikabbli għas-subsistemi ta' vetturi ferrovjarji. |
(8) |
L-ewwel STI dwar is-subsistema “vetturi ferrovjarji” daħlet fis-seħħ fl-2002. Minħabba l-impenji kuntrattwali eżistenti, subsistemi jew kostitwenti ta' l-interoperabbiltà ta' vetturi ferrovjarji, jew ir-rinnovament jew l-aġġornament tagħhom, għandhom jgħaddu minn valutazzjoni tal-konformità skond id-dispożizzjonijiet ta' din l-ewwel STI. Għaldaqstant, l-ewwel STI għandha tibqa’ applikabbli għall-finijiet ta' manutenzjoni, u sostituzzjoni marbuta mal-manutenzjoni għall-komponenti tas-subsistema u komponenti ta' l-interoperabbiltà awtorizzati fl-ewwel STI. Għaldaqstant, l-effetti tad-Deċiżjoni 2002/735/KE għandhom jinżammu fis-seħħ fir-rigward tal-manutenzjoni ta' proġetti awtorizzati b'konformità ma' l-STI annessa għal dik id-Deċiżjoni, kif ukoll għal proġetti għal linji ġodda u għar-rinnovament u l-aġġornament ta' linji eżistenti li jkunu fi stadju avvanzat ta' l-iżvilupp jew inkella s-suġġett ta' kuntratt li jkun qed jiġi eżegwit fid-data tan-notifika ta' din id-Deċiżjoni. Biex tiġi determinata d-differenza fl-ambitu ta' l-applikabbiltà bejn l-ewwel STI u l-STI il-ġdida li hija annessa ma' din id-Deċiżjoni, l-Istati Membri għandhom jinnotifikaw lista tas-subsistemi u tal-komponenti ta' l-interoperabbiltà li għalihom għadha applikabbli l-ewwel STI, sa mhux aktar tard minn sitt xhur wara d-data li fiha ssir applikabbli din id-Deċiżjoni. |
(9) |
Din l-STI ma timponix l-użu ta' teknoloġiji speċifiċi jew soluzzjonijiet tekniċi għajr fejn dan ikun strettament meħtieġ għall-interoperabbiltà tas-sistema ferrovjarja trans-Ewropea ta’ veloċità għolja. |
(10) |
Din l-STI tippermetti, għal perjodu limitat, li l-kostitwenti ta' l-interoperabbiltà jkunu inkorporati f'subsistemi mingħajr ċertifikazzjoni, jekk jintlaħqu ċerti kundizzjonijiet. |
(11) |
Fil-verżjoni attwali tagħha, din l-STI ma tittrattax għal kollox ir-rekwiżiti essenzjali kollha. F'konformità ma' l-Artikolu 17 tad-Direttiva 96/48/KE, l-aspetti tekniċi li mhumiex koperti huma identifikati bħala “Punti Mhux Konklużi” fl-Anness L għal din l-STI. F'konformità ma' l-Artikolu 16(3) tad-Direttiva 96/48/KE, l-Istati Membri għandhom jinnotifikaw lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra lista tar-regoli tekniċi nazzjonali tagħhom li jirrelataw mal-“Punti Mhux Konklużi” u l-proċeduri li għandhom jiġu segwiti għall-valutazzjoni tal-konformità tagħhom. |
(12) |
Fir-rigward tal-każijiet speċifiċi deskritti fil-Kapitolu 7 ta' din l-STI, l-Istati Membri għandhom jinnotifikaw lill-Kummisjsoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra l-proċeduri li għandhom jiġu segwiti għall-valutazzjoni tal-konformità. |
(13) |
It-traffiku ferrovjarju jopera skond ftehimiet eżistenti ta' natura nazzjonali, bilaterali, multinazzjonali jew internazzjonali. Huwa importanti li dawk il-ftehimiet ma jtellfux il-progress kurrenti u futur lejn l-interoperabbiltà. Għal dan il-għan, jeħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni teżamina dawk il-ftehimiet biex tiddetermina jekk l-STI ippreżentata f'din id-Deċiżjoni jeħtiġilhiex tkun riveduta skond dan. |
(14) |
L-STI tissejjes fuq l-aħjar għarfien espert disponibbli fi żmien it-tfassil ta' l-abbozz rilevanti. Sew biex tiġi inkoraġġita l-innovazzjoni, kif ukoll biex titqies l-esperjenza miksuba, l-STI annessa għandha tkun suġġetta għal reviżjoni kull tant żmien. |
(15) |
Din l-STI tħalli lok għal soluzzjonijiet innovattivi. Fejn dawn ikunu proposti, il-manifattur jew l-entità kontraenti għandu/ha jiddikjara/tiddikjara d-devjazzjoni mis-sezzjoni rilevanti ta' l-STI. L-Aġenzija Ferrovjarja Ewropea ser tiffinalizza l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet adegwati funzjonali u ta' “interface” tas-soluzzjoni, u tiżviluppa l-metodi ta' valutazzjoni. |
(16) |
Id-dispożizzjonijiet ta' din id-Deċiżjoni huma konformi ma' l-opinjoni tal-Kumitat stabbilit bl-Artikolu 21 tad-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 96/48/KE, |
ADOTTAT DIN ID-DEĊIŻJONI:
Artikolu 1
B'dan, il-Kummissjoni qiegħda tadotta Speċifikazzjoni Teknika għall-Interoperabbiltà (“STI”) rigward is-subsistema “vetturi ferrovjarji” tas-sistema ferrovjarja trans-Ewropea ta' veloċità għolja.
L-STI għandha tkun kif jidher fl-Anness għal din id-Deċiżjoni.
Artikolu 2
L-STI għandha tkun applikabbli għal vetturi ferrovjarji ġodda, aġġornati jew rinnovati kollha tas-sistema ferrovjarja trans-Ewropea ta’ veloċità għolja, kif definiti fl-Anness I għad-Direttiva 96/48/KE.
Artikolu 3
(1) Fir-rigward ta' dawk il-kwistjonijiet li jkunu kklassifikati bħala “Punti Mhux Konklużi” fl-Anness L għall-STI, il-kundizzjonijiet li għandhom ikunu sodisfatti għall-verifika ta' l-interoperabbiltà skond l-Artikolu 16(2) tad-Direttiva 96/48/KE għandhom ikunu dawk ir-regoli tekniċi applikabbli li jintużaw fl-Istat Membru li jawtorizza t-tqegħid fis-servizz tas-subsistemi koperti b'din id-Deċiżjoni.
(2) Kull Stat Membru għandu jinnotifika lill-Istati Membri l-oħra u lill-Kummissjoni fi żmien sitt xhur min-notifika ta' din id-Deċiżjoni:
(a) |
il-lista ta' regoli tekniċi applikabbli msemmija fil-paragrafu 1; |
(b) |
il-valutazzjoni tal-konformità u l-proċeduri ta' eżami li għandhom jiġu applikati rigward l-applikazzjoni ta' dawn ir-regoli; |
(c) |
il-korpi li jaħtar biex iwettqu dawk il-proċeduri ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità u ta' eżami. |
Artikolu 4
Fir-rigward ta' dawk il-kwistjonijiet li jkunu kklassifikati bħala “Każijiet Speċjali” fil-Kapitolu 7 ta' l-STI, il-proċeduri ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità għandhom ikunu dawk applikabbli fl-Istati Membri. Kull Stat Membru għandu jinnotifika lill-Istati Membri l-oħra u lill-Kummissjoni fi żmien sitt xhur min-notifika ta' din id-Deċiżjoni:
(a) |
il-valutazzjoni tal-konformità u l-proċeduri ta' eżami li għandhom jiġu applikati rigward l-applikazzjoni ta' dawn ir-regoli; |
(b) |
il-korpi li jaħtar biex iwettqu dawk il-proċeduri ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità u ta' eżami. |
Artikolu 5
L-STI tipprovdi perjodu ta' tranżizzjoni li matulu l-valutazzjoni tal-konformità u ċ-ċertifikazzjoni tal-kostitwenti ta' l-interoperabbiltà jkunu jistgħu jsiru bħala parti mis-subsistema. Matul dan iż-żmien, l-Istati Membri għandhom jinnotifikaw lill-Kummissjoni liema kostitwenti ta' l-interoperabbiltà jkunu ġew ivvalutati b'dan il-mod, biex ikun jista' jiġi ssorveljat mill-qrib is-suq tal-kostitwenti ta' l-interoperabbiltà u jittieħdu passi biex dan jiġi ffaċilitat.
Artikolu 6
Id-Deċiżjoni 2002/735/KE b'dan hija mħassra. Madankollu, id-dispożizzjonijiet tagħha għandhom jibqgħu japplikaw fir-rigward tal-manutenzjoni ta' proġetti awtorizzati f'konformità ma' l-TSI annessa għal dik id-Deċiżjoni, kif ukoll għal proġetti għal linji ġodda u għar-rinnovament u l-aġġornament ta' linji eżistenti li jkunu fi stadju avvanzat ta' l-iżvilupp jew inkella s-suġġett ta' kuntratt li jkun qed jiġi eżegwit fid-data tan-notifika ta' din id-Deċiżjoni.
Lista tas-subsistemi u l-kostitwenti ta' l-interoperabbiltà li għalihom jibqgħu japplikaw id-dispożizzjonijiet tad-Deċiżjoni 2002/735/KE għandha tkun innotifikata lill-Kummissjoni sa mhux aktar tard minn sitt xhur wara d-data li fiha din id-Deċiżjoni ssir applikabbli.
Artikolu 7
L-Istati Membri għandhom jinnotifikaw lill-Kummissjoni, fi żmien sitt xhur mid-dħul fis-seħħ ta' l-STI annessa, it-tipi ta' ftehimiet li ġejjin:
(a) |
ftehimiet nazzjonali, bilaterali jew multilaterali bejn l-Istati Membri u Impriża/i Ferrovjarja/i jew Ġestjonarja/i ta' l-Infrastruttura, maqbula fuq bażi permanenti jew temporanja u meħteġa minħabba n-natura speċifika ħafna jew lokali tas-servizz ferrovjarju maħsub; |
(b) |
ftehimiet bilaterali jew multilaterali bejn Impriża/i Ferrovjarja/i jew Ġestjonarja/i ta' l-Infrastruttura jew Stati Membri li jrendu livelli sinfikanti ta' interoperabbiltà lokali jew reġjonali; |
(c) |
ftehimiet internazzjonali bejn wieħed jew aktar mill-Istati Membri u talanqas pajjiż terz wieħed, jew bejn Impriża/i Ferrovjarja/i jew Ġestjonarja/i ta' l-Infrastruttura ta' l-Istati Membri u talanqas Impriża Ferrovjarja jew Ġestjonarja ta' l-Infrastruttura waħda ta' pajjiż terz, li jrendu livelli sinfikanti ta' interoperabbiltà lokali jew reġjonali. |
Artikolu 8
Din id-Deċiżjoni għandha tapplika mill-1 ta’ Settembru 2008.
Artikolu 9
Din id-Deċiżjoni hija indirizzata lill-Istati Membri.
Magħmul fi Brussell, 21 ta’ Frar 2008.
Għall-Kummissjoni
Jacques BARROT
Viċi President tal-Kummissjoni
(1) ĠU L 235, 17.9.1996, p. 6, id-Direttiva kif emendata bid-Direttiva 2004/50/KE (ĠU L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 114).
(2) ĠU L 245, 12.9.2002, p. 402.
ANNEX
DIRECTIVE 96/48/EC — INTEROPERABILITY OF THE TRANS-EUROPEAN HIGH SPEED RAIL SYSTEM
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR INTEROPERABILITY
‘Rolling stock’ Sub-System
1. |
INTRODUCTION | 146 |
1.1. |
Technical scope | 146 |
1.2. |
Geographical scope | 146 |
1.3. |
Content of this TSI | 146 |
2. |
DEFINITION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE ROLLING STOCK SUBSYSTEM | 147 |
2.1. |
Subsystem Description | 147 |
2.2. |
Functions and aspects of the rolling stock subsystem | 147 |
3. |
ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS | 147 |
3.1. |
General | 147 |
3.2. |
The essential requirements relate to | 148 |
3.3. |
General requirements | 148 |
3.3.1. |
Safety | 148 |
3.3.2. |
Reliability and availability | 150 |
3.3.3. |
Health requirements | 151 |
3.3.4. |
Protection of the environment | 151 |
3.3.5. |
Technical compatibility | 152 |
3.4. |
Requirements specific to the rolling stock subsystem | 153 |
3.4.1. |
Safety | 153 |
3.4.2. |
Reliability and availability | 154 |
3.4.3. |
Technical compatibility | 155 |
3.5. |
Requirements specific to maintenance | 156 |
3.6. |
Other requirements also concerning the rolling stock subsystem | 157 |
3.6.1. |
Infrastructure | 157 |
3.6.2. |
Energy | 157 |
3.6.3. |
Control-command and signalling | 158 |
3.6.4. |
Environment | 158 |
3.6.5. |
Operation | 159 |
3.7. |
Elements of the rolling stock subsystem related to the essential requirements | 160 |
4. |
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SUBSYSTEM | 162 |
4.1. |
Introduction | 162 |
4.2. |
Functional and technical specification of the subsystem | 163 |
4.2.1. |
General | 163 |
4.2.1.1. |
Introduction | 163 |
4.2.1.2. |
Design of trains | 164 |
4.2.2. |
Structure and mechanical parts | 165 |
4.2.2.1. |
General | 165 |
4.2.2.2. |
End couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains | 166 |
4.2.2.2.1. |
Subsystem requirements | 166 |
4.2.2.2.2. |
Interoperability constituent requirements | 166 |
4.2.2.2.2.1. |
Automatic centre buffer coupler | 166 |
4.2.2.2.2.2. |
Buffing and draw gear components | 166 |
4.2.2.2.2.3. |
Towing coupler for recovery and rescue | 166 |
4.2.2.3. |
Strength of vehicle structure | 166 |
4.2.2.3.1. |
General description | 166 |
4.2.2.3.2. |
Principles (functional requirements) | 167 |
4.2.2.3.3. |
Specifications (simple load cases and design collision scenarios) | 167 |
4.2.2.4. |
Access | 167 |
4.2.2.4.1. |
Passenger step | 167 |
4.2.2.4.2. |
External access door | 168 |
4.2.2.4.2.1. |
Passenger access doors | 168 |
4.2.2.4.2.2. |
Doors for freight use and for use of the train crew | 169 |
4.2.2.5. |
Toilets | 169 |
4.2.2.6. |
Driver's cab | 169 |
4.2.2.7. |
Windscreen and front of the train | 170 |
4.2.2.8. |
Storage facilities for use by staff | 170 |
4.2.2.9. |
External steps for use by shunting staff | 171 |
4.2.3. |
Track interaction and gauging | 171 |
4.2.3.1. |
Kinematic gauge | 171 |
4.2.3.2. |
Static axle load | 171 |
4.2.3.3. |
Rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems | 172 |
4.2.3.3.1. |
Electrical resistance | 172 |
4.2.3.3.2. |
Axle bearing health monitoring | 172 |
4.2.3.3.2.1. |
Class 1 trains | 172 |
4.2.3.3.2.2. |
Class 2 trains | 173 |
4.2.3.3.2.3. |
Hot axle box detection for Class 2 trains | 173 |
4.2.3.3.2.3.1. |
General | 173 |
4.2.3.3.2.3.2. |
Functional requirements for the vehicle | 173 |
4.2.3.3.2.3.3. |
Transverse dimensions and height above rail level of the target area | 173 |
4.2.3.3.2.3.4. |
Longitudinal dimension of the target area | 173 |
4.2.3.3.2.3.5. |
Limit criteria outside of the target area | 174 |
4.2.3.3.2.3.6. |
Emissivity | 174 |
4.2.3.4. |
Rolling stock dynamic behaviour | 175 |
4.2.3.4.1. |
General | 175 |
4.2.3.4.2. |
Limit values for running safety | 176 |
4.2.3.4.3. |
Track loading limit values | 177 |
4.2.3.4.4. |
Wheel/rail interface | 178 |
4.2.3.4.5. |
Design for vehicle stability | 178 |
4.2.3.4.6. |
Definition of equivalent conicity | 178 |
4.2.3.4.7. |
Design values for wheel profiles | 179 |
4.2.3.4.8. |
In service values of equivalent conicity | 179 |
4.2.3.4.9. |
Wheelsets | 180 |
4.2.3.4.9.1. |
Wheelsets | 180 |
4.2.3.4.9.2. |
Interoperability Constituent Wheels | 180 |
4.2.3.4.10. |
Specific requirements for vehicles with independently rotating wheels | 181 |
4.2.3.4.11. |
Detection of derailments | 181 |
4.2.3.5. |
Maximum train length | 181 |
4.2.3.6. |
Maximum gradients | 181 |
4.2.3.7. |
Minimum curve radius | 182 |
4.2.3.8. |
Flange lubrication | 182 |
4.2.3.9. |
Suspension coefficient | 182 |
4.2.3.10. |
Sanding | 182 |
4.2.3.11. |
Ballast pick up | 182 |
4.2.4. |
Braking | 182 |
4.2.4.1. |
Minimum braking performance | 182 |
4.2.4.2. |
Brake wheel/rail adhesion demand limits | 184 |
4.2.4.3. |
Brake system requirements | 185 |
4.2.4.4. |
Service braking performance | 186 |
4.2.4.5. |
Eddy current brakes | 186 |
4.2.4.6. |
Protection of an immobilised train | 187 |
4.2.4.7. |
Brake performance on steep gradients | 187 |
4.2.4.8. |
Brake requirements for rescue purposes | 187 |
4.2.5. |
Passenger information and communication | 188 |
4.2.5.1. |
Public address system | 188 |
4.2.5.2. |
Passenger information signs | 188 |
4.2.5.3. |
Passenger alarm | 188 |
4.2.6. |
Environmental conditions | 189 |
4.2.6.1. |
Environmental conditions | 189 |
4.2.6.2. |
Train aerodynamic loads in open air | 189 |
4.2.6.2.1. |
Aerodynamic loads on track workers at the lineside | 189 |
4.2.6.2.2. |
Aerodynamic loads on passengers on a platform | 190 |
4.2.6.2.3. |
Pressure loads in open air | 192 |
4.2.6.3. |
Crosswind | 193 |
4.2.6.4. |
Maximum pressure variations in tunnels | 195 |
4.2.6.5. |
Exterior noise | 196 |
4.2.6.5.1. |
Introduction | 196 |
4.2.6.5.2. |
Limits for stationary noise | 197 |
4.2.6.5.3. |
Limits for starting noise | 197 |
4.2.6.5.4. |
Limits for pass-by noise | 198 |
4.2.6.6. |
Exterior electromagnetic interference | 198 |
4.2.6.6.1. |
Interference generated on the signalling system and the telecommunications network: | 198 |
4.2.6.6.2. |
Electromagnetic interference: | 198 |
4.2.7. |
System protection | 199 |
4.2.7.1. |
Emergency exits | 199 |
4.2.7.1.1. |
Passengers’ emergency exits | 199 |
4.2.7.1.2. |
Driver's cab emergency exits | 199 |
4.2.7.2. |
Fire safety | 199 |
4.2.7.2.1. |
Introduction | 200 |
4.2.7.2.2. |
Measures to prevent fire | 200 |
4.2.7.2.3. |
Measures to detect/control fire | 200 |
4.2.7.2.3.1. |
Fire detection | 200 |
4.2.7.2.3.2. |
Fire extinguisher | 201 |
4.2.7.2.3.3. |
Fire resistance | 201 |
4.2.7.2.4. |
Additional measures to improve running capability | 201 |
4.2.7.2.4.1. |
Trains of all categories of fire safety | 201 |
4.2.7.2.4.2. |
Category B fire safety | 202 |
4.2.7.2.5. |
Specific measures for tanks containing flammable liquids | 202 |
4.2.7.2.5.1. |
General | 202 |
4.2.7.2.5.2. |
Specific requirements for fuel tanks | 203 |
4.2.7.3. |
Protection against electric shock | 204 |
4.2.7.4. |
External lights and horn | 204 |
4.2.7.4.1. |
Front and rear lights | 204 |
4.2.7.4.1.1. |
Head lights | 204 |
4.2.7.4.1.2. |
Marker lights | 204 |
4.2.7.4.1.3. |
Tail lights | 205 |
4.2.7.4.1.4. |
Lamp controls | 205 |
4.2.7.4.2. |
Horns | 205 |
4.2.7.4.2.1. |
General | 205 |
4.2.7.4.2.2. |
Warning horn sound pressure levels | 206 |
4.2.7.4.2.3. |
Protection | 206 |
4.2.7.4.2.4. |
Verification of sound pressure levels | 206 |
4.2.7.4.2.5. |
Interoperability constituent requirements | 207 |
4.2.7.5. |
Lifting/rescue procedures | 207 |
4.2.7.6. |
Interior noise | 207 |
4.2.7.7. |
Air conditioning | 208 |
4.2.7.8. |
Driver's vigilance device | 208 |
4.2.7.9. |
Control-command and signalling system | 208 |
4.2.7.9.1. |
General | 208 |
4.2.7.9.2. |
Wheelset location | 209 |
4.2.7.9.3. |
Wheels | 209 |
4.2.7.10. |
Monitoring and diagnostic concepts | 209 |
4.2.7.11. |
Particular specification for tunnels | 210 |
4.2.7.11.1. |
Passenger and train crew areas equipped with air conditioning | 210 |
4.2.7.11.2. |
Public address system | 210 |
4.2.7.12. |
Emergency lighting system | 210 |
4.2.7.13. |
Software | 210 |
4.2.7.14. |
Driver-Machine-Interface (DMI) | 210 |
4.2.7.15. |
Vehicle identification | 210 |
4.2.8. |
Traction and electrical equipment | 210 |
4.2.8.1. |
Traction performance requirements | 210 |
4.2.8.2. |
Traction wheel/rail adhesion requirements | 211 |
4.2.8.3. |
Functional and technical specification related to the electric power supply | 211 |
4.2.8.3.1. |
Voltage and frequency of the power supply | 212 |
4.2.8.3.1.1. |
Power supply | 212 |
4.2.8.3.1.2. |
Energy recuperation | 212 |
4.2.8.3.2. |
Maximum power and maximum current that is permissible to draw from the overhead contact line | 212 |
4.2.8.3.3. |
Power factor | 212 |
4.2.8.3.4. |
System energy disturbances | 212 |
4.2.8.3.4.1. |
Harmonic characteristics and related over-voltages on the overhead contact line | 212 |
4.2.8.3.4.2. |
Effects of DC content in AC supply | 212 |
4.2.8.3.5. |
Energy consumption measuring devices | 212 |
4.2.8.3.6. |
Rolling stock subsystem requirements linked to pantographs | 213 |
4.2.8.3.6.1. |
Pantograph contact force | 213 |
4.2.8.3.6.2. |
Arrangement of pantographs | 214 |
4.2.8.3.6.3. |
Insulation of pantograph from the vehicle | 214 |
4.2.8.3.6.4. |
Pantograph lowering | 215 |
4.2.8.3.6.5. |
Quality of current collection | 215 |
4.2.8.3.6.6. |
Electrical protection coordination | 215 |
4.2.8.3.6.7. |
Running through phase separation sections | 215 |
4.2.8.3.6.8. |
Running through system separation sections | 215 |
4.2.8.3.6.9. |
Height of pantographs | 216 |
4.2.8.3.7. |
Interoperability constituent pantograph | 216 |
4.2.8.3.7.1. |
Overall design | 216 |
4.2.8.3.7.2. |
Pantograph head geometry | 216 |
4.2.8.3.7.3. |
Pantograph static contact force | 217 |
4.2.8.3.7.4. |
Working range of pantographs | 217 |
4.2.8.3.7.5. |
Current capacity | 217 |
4.2.8.3.8. |
Interoperability constituent contact strip | 217 |
4.2.8.3.8.1. |
General | 217 |
4.2.8.3.8.2. |
Contact strip geometry | 217 |
4.2.8.3.8.3. |
Material | 217 |
4.2.8.3.8.4. |
Detection of contact strip breakage | 217 |
4.2.8.3.8.5. |
Current capacity | 218 |
4.2.8.3.9. |
Interfaces with electrification system | 218 |
4.2.8.3.10. |
Interfaces with control-command and signalling subsystem | 218 |
4.2.9. |
Servicing | 219 |
4.2.9.1. |
General | 219 |
4.2.9.2. |
Train external cleaning facilities | 219 |
4.2.9.3. |
Toilet discharge system | 219 |
4.2.9.3.1. |
On board discharge system | 219 |
4.2.9.3.2. |
Mobile discharge trolleys | 219 |
4.2.9.4. |
Train interior cleaning | 220 |
4.2.9.4.1. |
General | 220 |
4.2.9.4.2. |
Electrical sockets | 220 |
4.2.9.5. |
Water restocking equipment | 220 |
4.2.9.5.1. |
General | 220 |
4.2.9.5.2. |
Water filling adapter | 220 |
4.2.9.6. |
Sand restocking equipment | 220 |
4.2.9.7. |
Special requirements for stabling of trains | 221 |
4.2.9.8. |
Refuelling equipment | 221 |
4.2.10. |
Maintenance | 221 |
4.2.10.1. |
Responsibilities | 221 |
4.2.10.2. |
The maintenance file | 221 |
4.2.10.2.1. |
The maintenance design justification file | 221 |
4.2.10.2.2. |
The Maintenance Documentation | 222 |
4.2.10.3. |
Management of the maintenance file. | 223 |
4.2.10.4. |
Management of maintenance information. | 224 |
4.2.10.5. |
Implementation of the maintenance | 225 |
4.3. |
Functional and technical specification of the interfaces | 225 |
4.3.1. |
General | 225 |
4.3.2. |
Infrastructure subsystem | 228 |
4.3.2.1. |
Access | 228 |
4.3.2.2. |
Driver's cab | 228 |
4.3.2.3. |
Kinematic gauge | 229 |
4.3.2.4. |
Static axle load | 229 |
4.3.2.5. |
Rolling stock parameters, which influence ground based train monitoring systems | 229 |
4.3.2.6. |
Rolling stock dynamic behaviour and wheel profiles | 229 |
4.3.2.7. |
Maximum train length | 229 |
4.3.2.8. |
Maximum gradients | 229 |
4.3.2.9. |
Minimum curve radius | 229 |
4.3.2.10. |
Flange lubrication | 229 |
4.3.2.11. |
Ballast pick up | 229 |
4.3.2.12. |
Eddy current brake | 229 |
4.3.2.13. |
Brake performance on steep gradients | 230 |
4.3.2.14. |
Passenger alarm | 230 |
4.3.2.15. |
Environmental conditions | 230 |
4.3.2.16. |
Train aerodynamic loads in open air | 230 |
4.3.2.17. |
Crosswind | 230 |
4.3.2.18. |
Maximum pressure variations in tunnels | 230 |
4.3.2.19. |
Exterior noise | 230 |
4.3.2.20. |
Fire safety | 230 |
4.3.2.21. |
Head lights | 230 |
4.3.2.22. |
Particular specification for tunnels | 230 |
4.3.2.23. |
Servicing | 231 |
4.3.2.24. |
Maintenance | 231 |
4.3.3. |
Energy subsystem | 231 |
4.3.3.1. |
Reserved | 231 |
4.3.3.2. |
Brake system requirements | 231 |
4.3.3.3. |
Exterior electromagnetic interference | 231 |
4.3.3.4. |
Head lights | 231 |
4.3.3.5. |
Functional and technical specification related to power supply | 231 |
4.3.4. |
Control-Command and Signalling Subsystem | 231 |
4.3.4.1. |
Driver's cab | 231 |
4.3.4.2. |
Windscreen and front of the train | 231 |
4.3.4.3. |
Static axle load | 232 |
4.3.4.4. |
Rolling stock parameters, which influence ground based train monitoring systems | 232 |
4.3.4.5. |
Sanding | 232 |
4.3.4.6. |
Braking performance | 232 |
4.3.4.7. |
Electromagnetic interference | 232 |
4.3.4.8. |
Control-command and signalling system | 232 |
4.3.4.9. |
Monitoring and diagnostic concepts | 233 |
4.3.4.10. |
Particular specification for tunnels | 234 |
4.3.4.11. |
Functional and technical specification related to power supply | 234 |
4.3.4.12. |
Vehicle front lights | 234 |
4.3.5. |
Operation subsystem | 234 |
4.3.5.1. |
Design of the trains | 234 |
4.3.5.2. |
End couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains | 234 |
4.3.5.3. |
Access | 234 |
4.3.5.4. |
Toilets | 234 |
4.3.5.5. |
Windscreen and front of the train | 234 |
4.3.5.6. |
Rolling stock parameters, which influence ground based train monitoring systems | 234 |
4.3.5.7. |
Rolling stock dynamic behaviour | 234 |
4.3.5.8. |
Maximum train length | 234 |
4.3.5.9. |
Sanding | 234 |
4.3.5.10. |
Ballast pick up | 234 |
4.3.5.11. |
Braking performance | 234 |
4.3.5.12. |
Brake system requirements | 234 |
4.3.5.13. |
Eddy current brakes | 234 |
4.3.5.14. |
Protection of an immobilised train | 235 |
4.3.5.15. |
Brake performance on steep gradients | 235 |
4.3.5.16. |
Public address system | 235 |
4.3.5.17. |
Passenger alarm | 235 |
4.3.5.18. |
Environmental conditions | 235 |
4.3.5.19. |
Train aerodynamic loads in open air | 235 |
4.3.5.20. |
Crosswind | 235 |
4.3.5.21. |
Maximum pressure variations in tunnels | 235 |
4.3.5.22. |
Exterior noise | 235 |
4.3.5.23. |
Emergency exits | 236 |
4.3.5.24. |
Fire safety | 236 |
4.3.5.25. |
External lights and horn | 236 |
4.3.5.26. |
Lifting/rescue procedures | 236 |
4.3.5.27. |
Interior noise | 236 |
4.3.5.28. |
Air conditioning | 236 |
4.3.5.29. |
Driver's vigilance device | 236 |
4.3.5.30. |
Monitoring and diagnostic concepts | 236 |
4.3.5.31. |
Particular specification for tunnels | 236 |
4.3.5.32. |
Traction performance requirements | 236 |
4.3.5.33. |
Traction wheel/rail adhesion requirements | 236 |
4.3.5.34. |
Functional and technical specification related to power supply | 237 |
4.3.5.35. |
Servicing | 237 |
4.3.5.36. |
Vehicle identification | 237 |
4.3.5.37. |
Signal sighting | 237 |
4.3.5.38. |
Emergency exits | 237 |
4.3.5.39. |
Driver-Machine-Interface (DMI) | 237 |
4.4. |
Operating rules | 237 |
4.5. |
Maintenance rules | 238 |
4.6. |
Professional competencies | 238 |
4.7. |
Health and safety conditions | 238 |
4.8. |
Infrastructure and rolling stock registers | 239 |
4.8.1. |
Infrastructure register | 239 |
4.8.2. |
Rolling stock register | 240 |
5. |
INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS | 240 |
5.1. |
Definition | 240 |
5.2. |
Innovative solutions | 240 |
5.3. |
List of constituents | 240 |
5.4. |
Constituents performance and specifications | 241 |
6. |
ASSESSMENT OF CONFORMITY AND/OR SUITABILITY FOR USE | 241 |
6.1. |
Interoperability constituents of the rolling stock subsystem | 241 |
6.1.1. |
Conformity assessment (general) | 241 |
6.1.2. |
Conformity assessment procedures (modules) | 242 |
6.1.3. |
Existing solutions | 243 |
6.1.4. |
Innovative solutions | 243 |
6.1.5. |
Assessment of suitability for use | 243 |
6.2. |
Rolling stock subsystem | 244 |
6.2.1. |
Conformity assessment (general) | 244 |
6.2.2. |
Conformity assessment procedures (modules) | 244 |
6.2.3. |
Innovative solutions | 245 |
6.2.4. |
Assessment of maintenance | 245 |
6.2.5. |
Assessment of single vehicles | 245 |
6.3. |
Interoperable Constituents Not Holding an EC Declaration | 245 |
6.3.1. |
General | 245 |
6.3.2. |
The Transition Period | 245 |
6.3.3. |
The Certification of Subsystems Containing Non-Certified Interoperability Constituents during the Transition Period | 246 |
6.3.3.1. |
Conditions | 246 |
6.3.3.2. |
Notification | 246 |
6.3.3.3. |
Lifecycle Implementation | 246 |
6.3.4. |
Monitoring Arrangements | 247 |
7. |
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ROLLING STOCK TSI | 247 |
7.1. |
Implementation of the TSI | 247 |
7.1.1. |
Newly built rolling stock of new design | 247 |
7.1.1.1. |
Definitions | 247 |
7.1.1.2. |
General | 247 |
7.1.1.3. |
Phase A | 247 |
7.1.1.4. |
Phase B | 248 |
7.1.2. |
Newly built rolling stock of an existing design certified to an existing TSI | 248 |
7.1.3. |
Rolling stock of an existing design | 249 |
7.1.4. |
Rolling stock being upgraded or renewed | 249 |
7.1.5. |
Noise | 250 |
7.1.5.1. |
Transitional period | 250 |
7.1.5.2. |
Upgrading or renewal of rolling stock | 250 |
7.1.5.3. |
A two step approach | 250 |
7.1.6. |
Mobile toilet discharge trolleys [clause 4.2.9.3] | 250 |
7.1.7. |
Measures to prevent fire — material conformity | 250 |
7.1.8. |
Rolling stock operating under national, bilateral, multilateral or international agreements | 251 |
7.1.8.1. |
Existing agreements | 251 |
7.1.8.2. |
Future agreements | 251 |
7.1.9. |
TSI revision | 251 |
7.2. |
Compatibility of rolling stock with other subsystems | 251 |
7.3. |
Specific cases | 252 |
7.3.1. |
General | 252 |
7.3.2. |
List of specific cases | 252 |
7.3.2.1. |
General specific case on the 1 524 mm gauge network | 252 |
7.3.2.2. |
End couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains [clause 4.2.2.2] | 252 |
7.3.2.3. |
Passenger step [clause 4.2.2.4.1] | 252 |
7.3.2.4. |
Vehicle gauge [clause 4.2.3.1] | 253 |
7.3.2.5. |
Vehicle mass [clause 4.2.3.2] | 253 |
7.3.2.6. |
Electrical resistance of wheelsets [clause 4.2.3.3.1] | 253 |
7.3.2.7. |
Hot axle box detection for Class 2 trains [clause 4.2.3.3.2.3] | 254 |
7.3.2.8. |
Wheel-rail contact (wheel profiles) [4.2.3.4.4] | 255 |
7.3.2.9. |
Wheelsets [4.2.3.4.9] | 255 |
7.3.2.10. |
Maximum train length [4.2.3.5] | 255 |
7.3.2.11. |
Sanding [4.2.3.10] | 255 |
7.3.2.12. |
Braking [clause 4.2.4] | 256 |
7.3.2.12.1. |
General | 256 |
7.3.2.12.2. |
Eddy current brakes [clause 4.2.4.5] | 256 |
7.3.2.13. |
Environmental conditions [clause 4.2.6.1] | 256 |
7.3.2.14. |
Train Aerodynamics | 256 |
7.3.2.14.1. |
Aerodynamic loads on passengers on a platform [clause 4.2.6.2.2] | 256 |
7.3.2.14.2. |
Pressure loads in open air [clause 4.2.6.2.3] | 257 |
7.3.2.14.3. |
Maximum pressure variations in tunnels [clause 4.2.6.4] | 257 |
7.3.2.15. |
Boundary characteristics linked to exterior noise [clause 4.2.6.5] | 257 |
7.3.2.15.1. |
Limit for stationary noise [clause 4.2.6.5.2] | 257 |
7.3.2.15.2. |
Limit for starting noise [clause 4.2.6.5.3] | 258 |
7.3.2.16. |
Fire extinguisher [clause 4.2.7.2.3.2] | 258 |
7.3.2.17. |
Horns [clause 4.2.7.4.2.1] | 258 |
7.3.2.18. |
Control-command and signalling system [clause 4.2.7.10] | 258 |
7.3.2.18.1. |
Wheelset location [clause 4.2.7.10.2] | 258 |
7.3.2.18.2. |
Wheels [clause 4.2.7.10.3] | 259 |
7.3.2.19. |
Pantograph [clause 4.2.8.3.6.] | 260 |
7.3.2.20. |
Interfaces with control-command and signalling system [clause 4.2.8.3.8] | 263 |
7.3.2.21. |
Toilet discharge system connections [clause 4.2.9.3.] | 263 |
7.3.2.22. |
Water filling adapters [clause 4.2.9.5.] | 263 |
7.3.2.23. |
Fire Standards [clause 7.1.6] | 263 |
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Technical scope
This TSI concerns the rolling stock subsystem. These subsystems are included in the list of Annex II(1) to Directive 96/48/EC, as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC.
This TSI is applicable to the following classes of rolling stock, assessed as trainsets (indivisible in service), or as single vehicles, within defined formations of powered and non-powered vehicles. It applies equally to passenger and/or non-passenger carrying vehicles.
Class 1: Rolling stock having a maximum speed equal to or greater than 250 km/h.
Class 2: Rolling stock having a maximum speed of at least 190 km/h but less than 250 km/h.
This TSI shall be applied for rolling stock, referred in section 2 of annex I of Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Dir.2004/50/EC and having a maximum speed of at least 190 km/h as described above. But, if the maximum speed of this rolling stock is higher than 351 km/h, this TSI will apply, but additional specifications are necessary: these additional specifications are not detailed in this TSI and are an open point: national rules apply in such a case.
More information about the rolling stock subsystem is given in section 2.
This TSI specifies requirements with which rolling stock intended to be operated on the rail network as defined in section 1.2 below shall comply and thereby meet the essential requirements of Directive 96/48/EC, as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC.
Access to lines is not solely dependent on fulfilment of the technical requirements of this TSI, other requirements in Directive 2004/49 and Directive 2001/14, as modified by Directive 2004/50 shall also be taken into account in permitting a railway undertaking to operate this rolling stock on a specific line. For example an infrastructure manager is permitted to decide not to allocate a path for a class 2 train on a category 1 line for capacity reasons.
1.2. Geographical scope
The geographical scope of this TSI is the trans-European high-speed rail system as described in Annex I to Directive 96/48/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC.
1.3. Content of this TSI
In accordance with Article 5(3) and with Annex I, (1)b of Directive 96/48/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, this TSI:
(a) |
indicates its intended scope (section 2); |
(b) |
states essential requirements for the rolling stock subsystem (section 3) |
(c) |
establishes the functional and technical specifications to be met by the subsystems and their interfaces with other subsystems (section 4); |
(d) |
sets out, operating and maintenance rules specific to the scope indicated in sections 1.1 and 1.2 above (section 4). |
(e) |
indicates, for the persons concerned, the professional competencies and health and safety conditions at work required for the operation and maintenance of the subsystems (section 4). |
(f) |
determines the interoperability constituents and interfaces which are to be covered by European specifications, including European standards, which are necessary to achieve interoperability within the trans-European high-speed rail system (section 5); |
(g) |
states which procedures are to be used in order to assess the conformity or the suitability for use of the interoperability constituents, on the one hand, or the EC verification of the subsystems, on the other hand (section 6); |
(h) |
indicates the strategy for implementing the TSIs (section 7); |
(i) |
makes provision, in accordance with Article 6(3) of the Directive, specific cases (section 7). |
2. DEFINITION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE ROLLING STOCK SUBSYSTEM
2.1. Subsystem Description
The rolling stock subsystem includes neither the control-command, infrastructure, operation subsystems nor the trackside part of the energy subsystem, since these subsystems are specified in their own TSIs.
In addition, rolling stock subsystem does not include the train staff (driver and other on-board train crew) and passengers.
2.2. Functions and aspects of the rolling stock subsystem
The scope of this TSI for the rolling stock subsystem is expanded from that given in the TSI contained in Annex to Decision 2002/735/EC.
The functions to be fulfilled in the scope of the rolling stock subsystem are as follows:
— |
Carry and protect the passengers and train crew |
— |
Accelerate, maintain speed, brake and stop |
— |
Keep the train driver informed, provide a view ahead, and allow proper control |
— |
Support and guide the train on the track |
— |
Signal the presence of the train to others |
— |
Be able to operate safely even in the event of incidents |
— |
Respect the environment |
— |
Maintain the rolling stock subsystem and the on-board part of the energy subsystem |
— |
Be able to operate on relevant traction supply systems. |
The on-board control-command and signalling equipment is within the scope of the control-command and signalling subsystem.
3. ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
3.1. General
In the scope of this TSI, fulfilment of relevant essential requirements quoted in section 3 of this TSI will be ensured by the compliance with the specifications described:
— |
in section 4 for the subsystems, |
— |
and in section 5 for the interoperability constituents, |
— |
as demonstrated by a positive result of the assessment of: |
— |
conformity and/or suitability for use of the interoperability constituents |
— |
and verification of the subsystems. |
as described in section 6.
Parts of the essential requirements are covered by national rules because:
— |
open and reserved points are listed in Annex L; |
— |
derogations under art. 7 of the Directive 96/48/EC; |
— |
specific cases are described in section 7.3 of this TSI. |
The corresponding conformity assessment shall be carried out under the responsibility and according to procedures of the Member State that has notified the national rules or asked for the derogation or the specific case.
According to Article 4(1) of Directive 96/48/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, the Trans-European high-speed rail system, subsystems and their interoperability constituents shall meet the essential requirements set out in general terms in Annex III to the Directive.
Conformity of the rolling stock subsystem and its constituents to the essential requirements is checked in accordance with the provisions envisaged in Directive 96/48/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC as well as in this TSI.
3.2. The essential requirements relate to:
— |
safety, |
— |
reliability and availability, |
— |
health, |
— |
environmental protection, |
— |
technical compatibility. |
According to Directive 96/48/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, the essential requirements can be generally applied to the whole Trans-European high-speed rail system or be specific to particular aspects of each subsystem and its constituents.
3.3. General requirements
In the case of the rolling stock subsystem, the specific aspects, in addition to the considerations contained in Annex III to the Directive, are as follows:
3.3.1. Safety
Essential requirement 1.1.1:
‘The design, construction or assembly, maintenance and monitoring of safety-critical components, and more particularly of the components involved in train movements must be such as to guarantee safety at the level corresponding to the aims laid down for the network, including those for specific degraded situations.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.2.2 (end couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains) |
— |
4.2.2.3 (strength of vehicle structure) |
— |
4.2.2.4 (access) |
— |
4.2.2.6 (driver's cab) |
— |
4.2.2.7 (windscreen and front of the train) |
— |
4.2.3.1 (kinematic gauge) |
— |
4.2.3.3 (rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems) |
— |
4.2.3.4 (rolling stock dynamic behaviour) |
— |
4.2.3.10 (sanding) |
— |
4.2.3.11 (aerodynamic effects on ballast) |
— |
4.2.4 (braking) |
— |
4.2.5 (passenger information and communication) |
— |
4.2.6.2 (train aerodynamic loads in open air) |
— |
4.2.6.3 (crosswind) |
— |
4.2.6.4 (maximum pressure variations in tunnels) |
— |
4.2.6.6 (exterior electromagnetic interference) |
— |
4.2.7 (system protection) |
— |
4.2.7.13 (software) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
Essential requirement 1.1.2:
‘The parameters involved in the wheel-rail contact must meet the stability requirements needed in order to guarantee safe movement at the maximum authorised speed.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.3.2 (static axle load) |
— |
4.2.3.4 (rolling stock dynamic behaviour) |
Essential requirement 1.1.3:
‘The components used must withstand any normal or exceptional stresses that have been specified during their period in service. The safety repercussions of any accidental failures must be limited by appropriate means.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.2.2 (end couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains) |
— |
4.2.2.3 (strength of vehicle structure) |
— |
4.2.2.7 (windscreen and front of the train) |
— |
4.2.3.3.2 (axle bearing health monitoring) |
— |
4.2.3.4.3 (track loading limit values) |
— |
4.2.3.4.9 (wheelsets) |
— |
4.2.4 (braking) |
— |
4.2.6 1 (environmental conditions) |
— |
4.2.6.3 (crosswind) |
— |
4.2.6.4 (maximum pressure variations in tunnels) |
— |
4.2.7.2 (fire safety) |
— |
4.2.8.3.6 (pantographs and contact strips) |
— |
4.2.9 (servicing) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
Essential requirement 1.1.4:
‘The design of fixed installation and rolling stock and the choice of the materials used must be aimed at limiting the generation, propagation and effects of fire and smoke fumes in the event of a fire.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.7.2 (fire safety) |
Essential requirement 1.1.5:
‘Any devices intended to be handled by users must be so designed as not to impair their safety if used foreseeably in a manner not in accordance with the posted instructions.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.2.2 (end couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains) |
— |
4.2.2.4 (access) |
— |
4.2.2.5 (toilets) |
— |
4.2.4 (braking) |
— |
4.2.5.3 (passenger alarm) |
— |
4.2.7.1 (emergency exits) |
— |
4.2.7.3 (protection against electric shock) |
— |
4.2.7.5 (lifting/rescue procedures) |
— |
4.2.9 (servicing) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
3.3.2. Reliability and availability
Essential requirement 1.2:
‘The monitoring and maintenance of fixed or moveable components that are involved in train movements must be organised, carried out and quantified in such a manner as to maintain their operation under the intended conditions.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.2.2 (end couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains) |
— |
4.2.2.3 (strength of vehicle structure) |
— |
4.2.2.4 (access) |
— |
4.2.3.1 (kinematic gauge) |
— |
4.2.3.3.2 (axle bearing health monitoring) |
— |
4.2.3.4 (rolling stock dynamic behaviour) |
— |
4.2.3.9 (suspension coefficient) |
— |
4.2.4 (braking) |
— |
4.2.7.10 (monitoring and diagnostic concepts) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
3.3.3. Health requirements
Essential requirement 1.3.1:
‘Materials likely, by virtue of the way they are used, to constitute a health hazard to those having access to them must not be used in trains and railway infrastructures.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
Essential requirement 1.3.2:
‘Those materials must be selected, deployed and used in such a way as to restrict the emission of harmful and dangerous fumes or gases, particularly in the event of fire.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.7.2 (fire safety) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
3.3.4. Protection of the environment
Essential requirement 1.4.1:
‘The repercussions on the environment of the establishment and operation of the Trans-European high-speed rail system must be assessed and taken into account at the design stage of the system in accordance with the Community provisions in force.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.3.11 (ballast pick up) |
— |
4.2.6.2 (train aerodynamic load) |
— |
4.2.6.5 (exterior noise) |
— |
4.2.6.6 (exterior electromagnetic interference) |
— |
4.2.9 (servicing) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
Essential requirement 1.4.2:
‘The materials used in the trains must prevent the emission of fumes or gases which are harmful and dangerous to the environment, particularly in the event of fire.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.7.2 (fire safety) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
Essential requirement 1.4.3:
‘The rolling stock and energy-supply systems must be designed and manufactured in such a way as to be electromagnetically compatible with the installations, equipment and public or private networks with which they might interfere.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.6.6 (exterior electromagnetic interference) |
3.3.5. Technical compatibility
Essential requirement 1.5:
‘The technical characteristics of the infrastructures and fixed installations must be compatible with each other and with those of the trains to be used on the Trans-European high-speed rail system.
If adherence to these characteristics proves difficult on certain sections of the network, temporary solutions, which ensure compatibility in the future, may be implemented.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.2.4 (access |
— |
4.2.3.1 (kinematic gauge) |
— |
4.2.3.2 (static axle load) |
— |
4.2.3.3 (rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems) |
— |
4.2.3.4 (rolling stock dynamic behaviour) |
— |
4.2.3.5 (maximum train length) |
— |
4.2.3.6 (maximum gradients) |
— |
4.2.3.7 (minimum curve radius) |
— |
4.2.3.8 (flange lubrication) |
— |
4.2.3.11 (ballast pick up) |
— |
4.2.4 (braking) |
— |
4.2.6.2 (train aerodynamic load) |
— |
4.2.6.4 (maximum pressure variations in tunnels) |
— |
4.2.7.11 (particular specification for tunnels) |
— |
4.2.8.3 (functional and technical specification related to power supply) |
— |
4.2.9 (servicing) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
3.4. Requirements specific to the rolling stock subsystem
3.4.1. Safety
Essential requirement 2.4.1 § 1:
‘The rolling stock structures and those of the links between vehicles must be designed in such a way as to protect the passenger and driving compartments in the event of collision or derailment.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.2.2 (end couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains) |
— |
4.2.2.3 (strength of vehicle structure) |
Essential requirement 2.4.1 § 2:
‘The electrical equipment must not impair the safety and functioning of the control-command and signalling installations.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.6.6 (exterior electromagnetic interference) |
— |
4.2.8.3 (functional and technical specification related to power supply) |
Essential requirement 2.4.1 § 3:
‘The braking techniques and the stresses exerted must be compatible with the design of the tracks, engineering structures and signalling systems’.
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.3.4.3 (track loading limit values) |
— |
4.2.4.1 (minimum braking performance) |
— |
4.2.4.5 (eddy current brakes) |
Essential requirement 2.4.1 § 4:
‘Steps must be taken to prevent access to electrically-live constituents in order not to endanger the safety of persons’.
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.5.2 (passenger information signs) |
— |
4.2.7.3 (protection against electric shock) |
— |
4.2.9 (servicing) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
Essential requirement 2.4.1 § 5:
‘In the event of danger, devices must enable passengers to inform the driver and accompanying staff to contact him.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.5 (passenger information and communication) |
Essential requirement 2.4.1 § 6:
‘The access door must incorporate an opening and closing system which guarantees passenger safety.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.2.4.2 (external access door) |
Essential requirement 2.4.1 § 7:
‘Emergency exits must be provided and indicated.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.5.2 (passenger information signs) |
— |
4.2.7.1 (emergency exits) |
Essential requirement 2.4.1 § 8:
‘Appropriate provisions must be laid down to take account of the particular safety conditions in very long tunnels.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.5.3 (passenger alarm) |
— |
4.2.7.2 (fire safety) |
— |
4.2.7.11 (particular specification for tunnels) |
— |
4.2.7.12 (emergency lighting system) |
Essential requirement 2.4.1 § 9:
‘An emergency lighting system having a sufficient intensity and duration is an absolute requirement on board trains.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clause:
— |
4.2.7.12 (emergency lighting system) |
Essential requirement 2.4.1 § 10:
‘Trains must be equipped with a public address system which provides a means of communication to the public from on-board staff and ground control.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clause:
— |
4.2.5 (passenger information and communication) |
3.4.2. Reliability and availability
Essential requirement 2.4.2:
‘The design of the vital equipment and the running, traction and braking equipment and also the control command system must, in a specific degraded situation, be such as to enable the train to continue without adverse consequences for the equipment remaining in service.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.1.1 (introduction) |
— |
4.2.1.2 (design of the trains) |
— |
4.2.2.2 (end couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains) |
— |
4.2.4.1 (minimum braking performance) |
— |
4.2.4.2 (brake wheel/rail adhesion demand limits) |
— |
4.2.4.3 (brake system requirements) |
— |
4.2.4.4 (service braking performance) |
— |
4.2.4.6 (protection of an immobilised train) |
— |
4.2.4.7 (brake performance on steep gradients) |
— |
4.2.5.1 (public address system) |
— |
4.2.7.2 (fire safety) |
— |
4.2.7.10 (monitoring and diagnostic concepts) |
— |
4.2.7.12 (emergency lighting system) |
— |
4.2.8.1 (traction performance requirements) |
— |
4.2.8.2 (traction wheel/rail adhesion requirements) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
3.4.3. Technical compatibility
Essential requirement 2.4.3 § 1:
‘The electrical equipment must be compatible with the operation of the control command and signalling installations.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.6.6 (exterior electromagnetic interference) |
— |
4.2.8.3 (functional and technical specification related to power supply) |
Essential requirement 2.4.3 § 2:
‘The characteristics of the current-collection devices must be such as to enable trains to travel under the energy supply systems for the Trans-European high-speed rail system.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clause:
— |
4.2.8.3 (functional and technical specification related to power supply) |
Essential requirement 2.4.3 § 3:
‘The characteristics of the rolling stock must be such as to allow it to travel on any line on which it is expected to operate.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.2.4 (access) |
— |
4.2.3.1 (kinematic gauge) |
— |
4.2.3.2 (static axle load) |
— |
4.2.3.3 (rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems) |
— |
4.2.3.4 (rolling stock dynamic behaviour) |
— |
4.2.3.5 (maximum train length) |
— |
4.2.3.6 (maximum gradients) |
— |
4.2.3.7 (minimum curve radius) |
— |
4.2.3.11 (ballast pick up) |
— |
4.2.4 (braking) |
— |
4.2.6 (environmental conditions) |
— |
4.2.7.4 (external lights and horn) |
— |
4.2.7.9 (control-command and signalling system) |
— |
4.2.7.11 (particular specification for tunnels) |
— |
4.2.8 (traction and electrical equipment) |
— |
4.2.9 (servicing) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
— |
4.8 (infrastructure and rolling stock registers) |
3.5. Requirements specific to maintenance
Essential Requirement 2.5.1 Health:
‘The technical installations and the procedures used in the maintenance centres must not constitute a danger to human health.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:
— |
4.2.9 (servicing) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
Essential Requirement 2.5.2 Environmental protection:
‘The technical installations and the procedures used in the maintenance centres must not exceed the permissible levels of nuisance with regard to the surrounding environment.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.6.5 (exterior noise) |
— |
4.2.6.6 (exterior electromagnetic interference) |
— |
4.2.9 (servicing) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
Essential Requirement 2.5.3 Technical compatibility:
‘The maintenance installations [handling] high-speed trains must be such as to enable safety, health and comfort operations to be carried out on all trains for which they have been designed.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:
— |
4.2.9 (servicing) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
3.6. Other requirements also concerning the rolling stock subsystem
3.6.1. Infrastructure
Essential Requirement 2.1.1. Safety
‘Appropriate steps must be taken to prevent access to or undesirable intrusions into installations on lines travelled at high speed.’
‘Steps must be taken to limit the dangers to which persons are exposed, particularly in stations through which trains pass at high speed.’
‘Infrastructures to which the public has access must be designed and made in such a way as to limit any human health hazards (stability, fire, access, evacuation, platforms, etc.).’
‘Appropriate provisions must be laid down to take account of the particular safety conditions in very long tunnels.’
This essential requirement is not relevant to the scope of this TSI.
3.6.2. Energy
Essential Requirement 2.2.1. Safety
‘Operation of the energy-supply systems must not impair the safety either of high-speed trains or of persons (users, operating staff, trackside dwellers and third parties).’
This essential requirement is not relevant to the scope of this TSI.
Essential Requirement 2.2.2. Environmental protection
‘The functioning of the energy-supply systems must not interfere with the environment beyond the specified limits.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.6.6 (exterior electromagnetic interference) |
— |
4.2.8.3.6 (Rolling stock requirements linked to pantographs) |
Essential Requirement 2.2.3. Technical compatibility
‘The electricity supply systems used throughout the trans-European high-speed rail system must:
— |
enable trains to achieve the specified performance levels; |
— |
be compatible with the collection devices fitted to the trains.’ |
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clause:
— |
4.2.8.3 (functional and technical specification related to power supply) |
3.6.3. Control-command and signalling
Essential Requirement 2.3.1. Safety
‘The control and command and signalling installation and procedures used on the trans-European high-speed rail system must enable trains to travel with a level of safety which corresponds to the objectives set for the network.’
This essential requirement is not relevant to the scope of this TSI.
Essential Requirement 2.3.2. Technical compatibility
‘All new high-speed infrastructures and all new high-speed rolling stock manufactured or developed after adoption of compatible control and command and signalling must be tailored to the use of those systems.’
‘The control and command and signalling equipment installed within the train drivers’ cabs must permit normal operation, under the specified conditions, throughout the trans-European high-speed rail system.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.3.2 (static axle load) |
— |
4.2.3.3 (rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems) |
— |
4.2.6.6.1 (interference generated on the signalling system and the telecommunications network) |
— |
4.2.7.9 (control-command and signalling system) |
— |
4.2.8.3.10 (interfaces with control, command and signalling system) |
3.6.4. Environment
Essential Requirement 2.6.1. Health:
‘Operation of the trans-European high-speed rail system must remain within the statutory noise nuisance limits.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clauses:
— |
4.2.6.5 (exterior noise) |
— |
4.2.7.6 (interior noise) |
Essential Requirement 2.6.2. Environmental protection
‘Operation of the trans-European high-speed rail system must not cause a level of ground vibrations which is unacceptable for activities and the immediate environment in the vicinity of the infrastructure and in a normal state of maintenance.’
This essential requirement is not relevant to the scope of this TSI.
3.6.5. Operation
Essential Requirement 2.7.1. Safety § 1
‘Alignment of the network operating rules and the qualifications of drivers and on-board staff must be such as to ensure safe international operation.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in the following section:
— |
4.2.7.8 (driver's vigilance device) |
Essential Requirement 2.7.1. Safety § 2
‘The operations and maintenance intervals, the training and qualifications of maintenance staff and the quality assurance system set up in the maintenance centres of the operators concerned must be such as to ensure a high level of safety.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:
— |
4.2.9 (servicing) |
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
Essential Requirement 2.7.2. Reliability and availability
‘The operation and maintenance periods, the training and qualifications of the maintenance staff and the quality assurance system set up by the operators concerned in the maintenance centres must be such as to ensure a high level of system reliability and availability.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in clause:
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
Essential Requirement 2.7.3. Technical compatibility
‘The alignment of the operating rules of the networks and the qualifications of drivers, on-board staff and managers in charge of traffic must be such as to ensure operating efficiency on the trans-European high-speed rail system.’
This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:
— |
4.2.10 (maintenance) |
3.7. Elements of the rolling stock subsystem related to the essential requirements
|
Essential requirement clause of Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC |
|||||
Element of the rolling stock subsystem |
Ref. clause of TSI |
Safety |
Reliability Availability |
Health |
Environmental protection |
Technical compatibility |
General |
4.2.1 |
|
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Structure and mechanical parts |
4.2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Design of the trains |
4.2.1.2 |
|
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
End couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains |
4.2.2.2 |
1.1.1 1.1.3 1.1.5 2.4.1.1 |
1.2 2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Strength of vehicle structure |
4.2.2.3 |
1.1.1 1.1.3 2.4.1.1 |
1.2 |
|
|
|
Access |
4.2.2.4 |
1.1.1 1.1.5 |
1.2 |
|
|
1.5 2.4.3.3 |
Access door |
4.2.2.4.2 |
2.4.1.6 |
|
|
|
|
Toilets |
4.2.2.5 |
1.1.5 |
|
|
|
|
Driver's cab |
4.2.2.6 |
1.1.1 |
|
|
|
|
Windscreen & front of the train |
4.2.2.7 |
1.1.1 1.1.3 |
|
|
|
|
Track interaction and gauging |
4.2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kinematic gauge |
4.2.3.1 |
1.1.1 |
1.2 |
|
|
1.5 2.4.3.3 |
Static axle load |
4.2.3.2 |
1.1.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 2.4.3.3 2.3.2 |
Rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems |
4.2.3.3 |
1.1.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 2.4.3.3 2.3.2 |
Axle bearing health monitoring |
4.2.3.3.2 |
1.1.3 |
1.2 |
|
|
|
Rolling stock dynamic behaviour |
4.2.3.4 |
1.1.1 1.1.2 |
1.2 |
|
|
1.5 2.4.3.3 |
Track loading limit values |
4.2.3.4.3 |
1.1.3 2.4.1.3 |
|
|
|
|
Wheelsets |
4.2.3.4.9 |
1.1.3 |
|
|
|
|
Maximum train length |
4.2.3.5 |
|
|
|
|
1.5 2.4.3.3 |
Maximum gradients |
4.2.3.6 |
|
|
|
|
1.5 2.4.3.3 |
Minimum curve radius |
4.2.3.7 |
|
|
|
|
1.5 2.4.3.3 |
Flange lubrication |
4.2.3.8 |
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
Suspension coefficient |
4.2.3.9 |
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
Sanding |
4.2.3.10 |
1.1.1 |
|
|
|
|
Aerodynamic effects on ballast |
4.2.3.11 |
1.1.1 |
|
|
1.4.1 |
1.5 2.4.3.3 |
Braking |
4.2.4 |
1.1.1 1.1.3 1.1.5 |
1.2 |
|
|
1.5 2.4.3.3 |
Minimum braking performance |
4.2.4.1 |
2.4.1.3 |
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Brake wheel/rail adhesion demand limits |
4.2.4.2 |
|
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Brake system requirements |
4.2.4.3 |
|
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Service Braking Performance |
4.2.4.4 |
|
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Eddy current brakes |
4.2.4.5 |
2.4.1.3 |
|
|
|
|
Protection of an immobilised train |
4.2.4.6 |
|
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Brake performance on steep gradients |
4.2.4.7 |
|
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Passenger information and communication |
4.2.5 |
1.1.1 2.4.1.5 2.4.1.10 |
|
|
|
|
Public address system |
4.2.5.1 |
|
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Passenger information signs |
4.2.5.2 |
2.4.1.4 2.4.1.7 |
|
|
|
|
Passenger alarm |
4.2.5.3 |
1.1.5 2.4.1.8 |
|
|
|
|
Environmental conditions |
4.2.6 |
|
|
|
|
2.4.3.3 |
Environmental conditions |
4.2.6.1 |
1.1.3 |
|
|
|
|
Train aerodynamic loads in open air |
4.2.6.2 |
1.1.1 |
|
|
1.4.1 |
1.5 |
Crosswind |
4.2.6.3 |
1.1.1 1.1.3 |
|
|
|
|
Maximum Pressure Variations in Tunnels |
4.2.6.4 |
1.1.1 1.1.3 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
Exterior Noise |
4.2.6.5 |
|
|
2.6.1 |
1.4.1 2.5.2 |
|
Exterior Electromagnetic Interference |
4.2.6.6 |
1.1.1 2.4.1.2 |
|
|
1.4.1 1.4.3 2.5.2 2.2.2 |
2.4.3.1 |
Interference generated on the signalling system and the telecommunications network |
4.2.6.6.1 |
|
|
|
|
2.3.2 |
System protection |
4.2.7 |
1.1.1 |
|
|
|
|
Emergency exits |
4.2.7.1 |
1.1.5 2.4.1.7 |
|
|
|
|
Fire safety |
4.2.7.2 |
1.1.3 1.1.4 2.4.1.8 |
2.4.2 |
1.3.2 |
1.4.2 |
|
Protection against electric shock |
4.2.7.3 |
1.1.5 2.4.1.4 |
|
|
|
|
External lights and horn |
4.2.7.4 |
|
|
|
|
2.4.3.3 |
Lifting/rescue procedures |
4.2.7.5 |
1.1.5 |
|
|
|
|
Interior Noise |
4.2.7.6 |
|
|
2.6.1 |
|
|
Air Conditioning |
4.2.7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Driver's Vigilance Device |
4.2.7.8 |
2.7.1 |
|
|
|
|
Control-command system |
4.2.7.9 |
1.1.1 |
|
|
|
2.4.3.3 2.3.2 |
Monitoring and Diagnostic Concepts |
4.2.7.10 |
|
1.2 2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Particular specification for tunnels |
4.2.7.11 |
2.4.1.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 2.4.3.3 |
Emergency lighting system |
4.2.7.12 |
2.4.1.8 2.4.1.9 |
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Software |
4.2.7.13 |
1.1.1 |
|
|
|
|
Traction and electrical equipment |
4.2.8 |
|
|
|
|
2.4.3.3 |
Traction performance requirements |
4.2.8.1 |
|
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Traction wheel/rail adhesion requirements |
4.2.8.2 |
|
2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Functional and technical specification related to power supply |
4.2.8.3 |
2.4.1.2 |
|
|
2.2.3 |
1.5 2.4.3.1 2.4.3.2 |
Pantographs and contact strips |
4.2.8.3.6 |
|
|
|
2.2.2 |
|
Interfaces with control, command and signalling system |
4.2.8.3.8 |
|
|
|
|
2.3.2 |
Servicing |
4.2.9 |
1.1.3 1.1.5 2.4.1.4 2.7.1 |
|
2.5.1 |
1.4.1 2.5.2 |
1.5 2.4.3.3 2.5.3 |
Maintenance |
4.2.10 |
1.1.3 1.1.5 2.4.1.4 2.7.1 |
1.2 2.4.2 2.7.2 |
1.3.1 1.3.2 2.5.1 |
1.4.1 1.4.2 2.5.2 |
1.5 2.4.3.3 2.5.3 2.7.3 |
Infrastructure and rolling stock registers |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
2.4.3.3 |
4. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SUBSYSTEM
4.1. Introduction
The rolling stock subsystem shall be verified in accordance with Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC with the objective of assuring interoperability in respect of the essential requirements.
The functional and technical specifications of the subsystem and its interfaces, described in sections 4.2 and 4.3, shall not impose the use of specific technologies or technical solutions, except where this is strictly necessary for the interoperability of the trans-European High Speed rail network. Innovative solutions, which do not fulfil the requirements, specified in this TSI and/or which are not assessable as stated in this TSI require new specifications and/or new assessment methods. In order to allow technological innovation, these specifications and assessment methods shall be developed by the process described in clauses 6.1.4 and 6.2.3.
The common characteristics of rolling stock subsystem are defined in section 4 of this TSI. Particular characteristics are listed in the rolling stock register (see Annex I of this TSI)
4.2. Functional and technical specification of the subsystem
4.2.1. General
4.2.1.1. Introduction
The basic parameters for the rolling stock subsystem are:
— |
Maximum Track Forces (track loading limit values) |
— |
Axle Load |
— |
Maximum Train Length |
— |
Vehicle Kinematic Gauge |
— |
Minimum Braking Characteristics |
— |
Electrical Boundary Characteristics for Rolling Stock |
— |
Mechanical Boundary Characteristics for Rolling Stock |
— |
Exterior Noise Limits |
— |
Electromagnetic Interference Limits |
— |
Interior Noise Limits |
— |
Air Conditioning Limits |
— |
Requirements for the Transport of People with Reduced Mobility |
— |
Maximum Pressure Variations in Tunnels |
— |
Maximum Gradients |
— |
Geometry of the pantograph collector head |
— |
Maintenance |
Performance criteria for the Trans-European high-speed network shall be met for the specific requirements for each of the following line categories as appropriate for the class of train:
— |
Lines specifically built for high speed, |
— |
Lines specifically upgraded for high speed, |
— |
Lines specifically upgraded for high speed but with special features, |
as described in Annex I § 1of Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC.
For the rolling stock subsystem these requirements are:
(a) |
Minimum Performance Requirements In order to run on the trans-European high-speed network and under conditions allowing trains to slot smoothly into the overall traffic pattern, all high-speed rolling stock shall be required to guarantee minimum traction and braking performance levels. The trains shall have sufficient standby and backup capacity to ensure that these performance levels are maintained or only slightly downgraded in case of breakdown in systems or modules contributing to these processes (traction equipment from pantograph to axles, mechanical/electrical braking equipment). These margins and redundancies are defined in detail in the characteristics contained in clauses 4.2.1, 4.2.4.2, 4.2.4.3, 4.2.5.1, 4.2.4.7, 4.2.7.2, 4.2.7.12, 4.2.8.1, and 4.2.8.2. For safety significant failures of rolling stock equipment or functions described in this TSI, or passenger overload, the rolling stock keeper and/or the railway undertaking shall, have defined the operating rules associated with each reasonably foreseeable degraded mode in full knowledge of the consequences as defined by the manufacturer. The operating rules are part of the safety management system of the railway undertaking and are not required to be verified by a notified body. For this purpose, the manufacturer shall describe and list in a document the various reasonably foreseeable degraded modes and the related acceptable limits and operating conditions of the rolling stock subsystem that can be experienced. This document shall be part of the technical file according to § 4 of annex VI of Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC and shall be taken into account in the operational rules. |
(b) |
Maximum service speed of trains Trains shall have in conformity with Article 5(3) and Annex I of the Directive 96/48/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC a maximum service speed of:
The service speed is the nominal speed trains are expected to run in daily operation on appropriate sections. In all cases, it shall be possible for rolling stock to be worked at their maximum speed (if allowed by the infrastructure) with sufficient acceleration margins (as specified in the following paragraphs). |
4.2.1.2. Design of trains
(a) |
This TSI is applicable to both trainsets and single vehicles, but always assessed within defined formations of powered and non-powered vehicles. |
(b) |
For both classes of train the following configurations are permissible:
|
(c) |
Class 1 trains shall be self-propelled trainsets and shall provide a driver's cab at each end and be capable of bi-directional operation and to achieve the performance stated in this TSI. To allow train capacity to meet changing traffic needs it is permissible to couple trainsets to run in multiple. Such a train formed from two or more trainsets shall also meet the relevant specifications and performance in this TSI. It is not a requirement that trainsets of different manufacturers’ designs, or trains from other railway undertakings shall be able to operate coupled together. |
(d) |
Class 2 trains shall be either trainsets, or trains of variable formation with or without bi-directional capabilities. They shall be capable of the performance stated in this TSI. To allow train capacity to meet changing traffic needs it is permissible to couple Class 2 trains to run in multiple, or to add vehicles in the case of trains with locomotives and coaches, where they remain in defined formations. Such a train formed from two or more trains shall meet the relevant specifications and performance in this TSI. It is not a requirement that trainsets of different manufacturers’ designs, or trains from other railway undertakings shall be able to operate coupled together under normal conditions. |
(e) |
To allow train capacity to meet changing traffic needs it is permissible to couple Class 1 and Class 2 trains to run in multiple. Such a train formed from two or more trains shall meet the relevant specifications and performance in this TSI. It is not a requirement that trainsets of different manufacturers’ designs, or trains from other railway undertakings shall be able to operate coupled together. |
(f) |
For both classes of trains, whether assessing a trainset or a single vehicle within one or more formations, the formations for which such assessments are valid shall be clearly defined by the party asking for assessment, and clearly stated in the type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification. It is not permissible to assess a single vehicle without reference to a specific formation. The definition of each formation shall include the type designation, the number of vehicles and TSI relevant characteristics of the vehicles (as listed in the rolling stock register). |
(g) |
The characteristics of each vehicle in a train shall be such that the train fulfils the requirement of this TSI. Some requirements are capable of being assessed for a single vehicle and some have to be assessed with reference to a defined formation as defined in section 6 for each requirement. |
(h) |
The formation(s) for which each assessment is valid shall be clearly defined in the type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification. |
Definitions
1. |
A trainset is a fixed formation that can only be reconfigured within a workshop environment, if at all. |
2. |
EMU/DMU (Electric/Diesel Multiple Unit), are trainsets, where all vehicles are capable of carrying a payload. Traction and other equipment are usually, but not exclusively under-floor. |
3. |
A Power Head is a traction vehicle of a trainset with a single driver's cab at one end, which is not capable of carrying a payload. |
4. |
A Locomotive is a traction vehicle that is not capable of carrying a payload and has the ability to uncouple in normal operation from a train and operate independently. |
5. |
A coach is a non-traction vehicle in a fixed or variable formation capable of carrying a payload. It is permitted to equip such a coach with a driver's cab. Such a coach is named a driving coach. |
6. |
A train is an operational formation consisting of one or more vehicles or trainsets |
7. |
Defined formation see 4.2.1.2.f |
4.2.2. Structure and mechanical parts
4.2.2.1. General
This section deals with the requirements for coupling arrangements, vehicle structures, access, toilets, drivers cabs, windscreens and the front-end designs of the train.
4.2.2.2. End couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains
4.2.2.2.1. Subsystem requirements
(a) |
Class 1 trains shall be equipped at each end of the train with an automatic centre buffer coupler as defined in clause 4.2.2.2.2.1. This is to enable such trains to be rescued in the event of a breakdown by another Class 1 train. |
(b) |
Class 2 trains shall be equipped at each end either
|
(c) |
All trains equipped with automatic centre buffer couplers meeting the requirements of clause 4.2.2.2.2.1 shall be provided with a towing coupler as defined in clause 4.2.2.2.2.3 available on board. This is to enable such trains to be rescued or recovered in the event of a breakdown by motive power units or other trains, equipped with buffing and draw components compliant to clause 4.2.2.2.2.2. |
(d) |
Provision to enable Class 1 and 2 trains to be rescued in the event of a breakdown is required only by a motive power unit or another train equipped with automatic centre buffer couplers meeting the requirements of clause 4.2.2.2.2.1 or with buffing and draw components compliant to clause 4.2.2.2.2.2. |
(e) |
Requirements for the pneumatic brake equipment of high speed trains for towing in case of emergency rescue are specified in clause 4.2.4.8. and in clause K.2.2.2 of Annex K. |
4.2.2.2.2. Interoperability constituent requirements
4.2.2.2.2.1. Automatic centre buffer coupler
Automatic centre buffer couplers shall be geometrically and functionally compatible with a ‘Type 10 latch system automatic centre buffer coupler’ (also known as the ‘Scharfenberg’ system) as shown in Annex K clause K.1.
4.2.2.2.2.2. Buffing and draw gear components
The buffing and draw gear components shall be compliant with clause 4.2.2.1.2 of the Conventional Rail Rolling Stock Freight Wagons TSI 2005.
4.2.2.2.2.3. Towing coupler for recovery and rescue
Towing couplers for recovery and rescue shall meet the requirements of Annex K clause K.2.
4.2.2.3. Strength of vehicle structure
4.2.2.3.1. General description
The static and dynamic strength of vehicle bodies shall ensure the safety required for the occupants.
The railway safety system is based on active and passive safety.
— |
Active safety: Systems which reduce the probability of an accident occurring or the severity of the accident |
— |
Passive safety: Systems which reduce the consequences of an accident, should it occur |
Passive safety systems shall not be used to compensate for a possible lack of active safety in the railway network but shall be complementary to active safety in order to complement personal safety when all other measures have failed.
4.2.2.3.2. Principles (functional requirements)
In the event of a frontal impact as described in the scenarios below, the mechanical structure of vehicles shall:
— |
Limit deceleration, |
— |
Maintain survival space and structural integrity of the occupied areas, |
— |
Reduce the risk of derailment. |
— |
Reduce the risk of over-riding, |
Deformation shall be controlled in order to, as a minimum, absorb the energy of the design collision scenarios. Deformation shall be progressive, without overall instabilities or failures and shall occur in the designated collapse zones only. Collapse zones can be:
— |
reversible and irreversible deformable parts of the buffing/coupling gears; |
— |
non-structural devices; |
— |
crumple zones in the car-body; |
— |
or any combination of the above. |
The crumple zones shall either be located in non-occupied areas close to the extremities of each vehicle, in front of the cab and in inter-car gangways, or if this is not possible in adjacent areas of temporary occupation (for example toilets or vestibules) or cabs. Crumple zones are not allowed in passenger seating areas including those equipped with folding (tip up) seats.
4.2.2.3.3. Specifications (simple load cases and design collision scenarios)
(a) |
The structural elements of the body shell of each vehicle shall be able to withstand the longitudinal and vertical static loads for the vehicle bodies corresponding to category P II of EN12663:2000 as a minimum. |
(b) |
Four collision scenarios shall be considered:
The details for the above scenarios and the corresponding criteria are to be found in annex A. |
4.2.2.4. Access
4.2.2.4.1. Passenger step
This is specified in detail by clauses 4.2.2.12.1, 4.2.2.12.2 and 4.2.2.12.3 in the TSI for Accessibility for Persons With Reduced Mobility.
4.2.2.4.2. External access door
4.2.2.4.2.1. Passenger access doors
The relevant clauses of 4.2.2.4. of the TSI for Accessibility for Persons With Reduced Mobilit. will also apply.
(a) |
Terminology used:
|
(b) |
Door operation: To latch or unlatch a manually operated door, for use by the public, the control device shall be operable by the palm of the hand exerting a force not exceeding 20 Newton. The force required to open or close a manual door shall not exceed: If pushbuttons are provided for the powered operation of doors then each pushbutton shall be illuminated (or the surround shall be illuminated) when enabled and shall be operable by a force not greater than 15 Newton. |
(c) |
Door closing: The door control device shall allow the train crew (driver or conductor) to close and lock the doors before the train departs. When the locking control is under staff control and activated from a door, it is permissible for this door to remain open when the other doors close. It shall be possible for staff to close and lock this door subsequently. This door shall automatically close when the train reaches 5 km/h after which locking shall be initiated. The doors shall be kept closed and locked until the train crew releases them. In the event of loss of power to the door controls, the doors shall be kept locked by the locking mechanism. An audible warning sound shall be activated before the doors start to close. |
(d) |
Information available to the train crew: An appropriate device shall indicate to the driver or the train crew that all the doors (except for the door under local control of the train crew) are closed and locked. Appropriate indication shall be provided to the driver or the train crew of any fault in the door closing operation. A ‘door locked out of service’ shall not be taken into account. |
(e) |
Locking a door out of service: A manual device shall be provided to enable the train crew to lock a door out of service. This action shall be possible from both inside and outside the train. After the door is locked out of service, it shall no longer be taken into account by the door controls or the onboard monitoring systems. |
(f) |
Door opening release: The train crew shall be provided with controls that allow the doors to be released separately on each side, to allow them to be opened by passengers when the train is stopped. |
(g) |
Door opening control: A normal opening control or opening device shall be accessible for passengers from both the outside and the inside of the vehicle. Each door shall be provided with one of the following systems, either system shall be equally acceptable to all Member States:
This device shall have no effect on ‘a door locked out of service’. In such a case the door shall be unlocked first. Each door shall be provided with an individual external emergency-opening device, accessible to rescue staff, to allow that door to be opened for emergency reasons. This device shall have no effect on ‘a door locked out of service’. In such an emergency case the door shall be unlocked first. |
(h) |
The number of the doors and their dimensions shall allow the complete evacuation within three minutes by passengers without their baggage in a situation where the train is stopped alongside a platform. It is permitted to consider that passengers with reduced mobility are to be assisted by other passengers or staff, and that wheelchair users are evacuated without their wheelchair. Verification of this requirement shall be made by a physical test with a normal load as defined in clause 4.2.3.2 and under normal operating conditions. |
(i) |
Doors shall be fitted with transparent windows to allow passengers to identify the presence of a platform. |
4.2.2.4.2.2. Doors for freight use and for use of the train crew
A device shall allow the driver or train crew to close and lock the doors before the train departs.
The doors shall be kept closed and locked until the driver or train crew releases them.
4.2.2.5. Toilets
On passenger carrying trains, sealed retention toilets shall be installed onboard. Flushing is permissible with either clean water or by re-circulation techniques.
If the flushing medium is not clean water, the characteristics of the flushing medium shall be recorded in the rolling stock register.
4.2.2.6. Driver's cab
(a) |
access and egress The cab shall be accessible from both sides of the train from the platforms as defined in the High-Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006 and from a level 200mm below the top of the rail on a stabling track. It is permissible for this access to be either directly from the exterior or through an adjoining compartment at the rear of the cab. The train crew shall be able to prevent the cab being accessed by non-authorised persons. |
(b) |
External visibility Forward Vision: The driver's cab shall be designed such that a driver has a clear, unobstructed line of sight to be able to see fixed signals set to both the left and right of the track from the normal seated driving position as defined in Annex B, Figures B.1, B.2, B.3, B.4 and B.5, when the train is on a level and straight track, with the signals following locations defined in Annex B, measured from either the coupling face or the buffer plane (whichever is applicable). Consideration of a standing driving position is not required Side vision: The driver shall be provided with an opening window or opening panel, sufficiently large for the driver to put his head through the aperture, at each side of the cab. Additional equipment for side and rearwards vision is not mandatory. |
(c) |
Seats: The main seat available to the driver shall be designed in such a way that it allows him to undertake all normal driving functions in a seated position. Requirements related to health, safety and ergonomics are an open point. In addition, a second forward facing seat shall be provided for possible accompanying crew. The requirements for external visibility given in section b) do not apply to this position. |
(d) |
Interior layout: Freedom of movement of personnel in the cab interior shall not be inhibited by obstructions. Steps are not permitted on the cab floor; they are permitted between the cab and adjacent compartments or outside doors. The interior layout shall take into account the anthropometric dimensions of the driver as set out in Annex B.. |
4.2.2.7. Windscreen and front of the train
The driver's cab windscreens shall:
(a) |
be of an optical quality in accordance with the following characteristics: The types of safety glass used for the front windows, and any heated windows (windows heated to prevent frost) of drivers’ cabs shall not alter the colour of signals and their quality shall be such that the glass, when pierced or starred, remains in position and affords staff protection and sufficient visibility to enable the train to continue its journey. These requirements are set out in clause J.1 of Annex J. |
(b) |
be equipped with de-icing, de-misting and external cleaning facilities. |
(c) |
be able to resist impacts from projectiles as specified in clause J.2.1 of Annex J and resist spalling as specified in clause J.2.2 of Annex J. |
The front end of the train shall be capable of resisting the same impact as the window in order to protect persons travelling in the front vehicle.
The inside face of the windscreen shall be supported along its edges to limit intrusion in case of an accident.
4.2.2.8. Storage facilities for use by staff
In or near to driver cabs and where a train is equipped with a separate service compartment there shall be adequate storage facilities for clothing and equipment that must travel with the staff.
4.2.2.9. External steps for use by shunting staff
Where a train
— |
is equipped with UIC couplers |
— |
is of variable consist |
— |
and external steps for use by shunting staff are required |
such steps shall conform to the requirements of clause 4.2.2.2 of CR RST Freight Wagon TSI.
4.2.3. Track interaction and gauging
4.2.3.1. Kinematic gauge
Rolling stock shall comply with one of the kinematic vehicle gauges defined in Annex C of the Conventional Rail Rolling Stock Freight Wagon TSI 2005.
The pantograph gauge shall comply with Clause 5.2 of prEN 50367:2006
The type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification of the rolling stock and the rolling stock register shall indicate the assessed gauge.
4.2.3.2. Static axle load
The nominal static axle load (Po) on the track shall meet the following requirements, in order to limit the forces exerted on the track by the train. Measurements shall be made under the following normal load conditions: with normal payload, train crew, all materials needed for operation (e.g. lubricants, coolants, catering equipment, flushing medium for toilets etc.) and 2/3 of consumables (e.g. fuel, sand, food, etc).
The following definition of the normal payload will apply, dependant upon the type of vehicle or area:
— |
Passenger seating areas including seats in dining cars: number of passenger seats multiplied by 80 kg (stools (low and high), resting bars or standing aids are not classified as seats) |
— |
Areas of temporary occupation (e.g. vestibules, gangways, toilets): no passenger payload to be taken into account |
— |
Other compartments not accessible to passengers containing luggage, freight: maximum payload in revenue service |
The different types of vehicles are defined in clause 4.2.1.2.
The nominal static load Po per axle shall be as set out in Table 1 (1 tonne (t) = 1 000 kg):
Table 1
Static axle load
|
Maximum service speed V [km/h] |
||||
190 ≤ V ≤ 200 |
200 < V ≤ 230 |
230 < V < 250 |
V = 250 |
V > 250 |
|
Class 1 |
|
|
|
≤ 18 t |
≤ 17 t |
Class 2 locomotives and powerheads |
≤ 22,5 t |
≤ 18 t |
n/a |
n/a |
|
Class 2 multiple units |
≤ 20 t |
≤ 18 t |
n/a |
n/a |
|
Class 2 loco hauled coaches |
≤ 18 t |
n/a |
n/a |
The maximum total static axle load of the train (the total mass of the train) shall not be greater than:
|
(the sum of all nominal static axle loads of the train) x 1,02. |
The total mass of the train shall not exceed 1 000 t
The maximum individual static axle load of any axle shall not be greater than:
|
(the nominal individual static axle load) x 1,04. |
The difference in static wheel load between any wheel on the same bogie or running gear shall not exceed 6 % of the average wheel load of that bogie or running gear. It is permitted to centre the car body to the centre lines of the bogies before the weighing process.
Individual static axle loads shall not be less than 5 t. This value satisfies the requirement specified in clauses 3.1.1, 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.2.3.3. Rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems
4.2.3.3.1. Electrical resistance
To ensure the operation of track circuits, the electrical resistance of each wheelset, measured from tyre to tyre shall meet the requirements of clause 3.5 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI:2006.
In the case of independent wheels (left and right parallel wheels that rotate independently), it is necessary to electrically connect the pair of wheels to achieve the above values.
4.2.3.3.2. Axle bearing health monitoring
4.2.3.3.2.1. Class 1 trains
The health of wheelset bearings on Class 1 trains shall be monitored by on board detection equipment.
This equipment shall be able to detect a deterioration of the wheelset bearing health, either by monitoring its temperature, or its dynamic frequencies or some other suitable wheelset bearing health condition characteristic. A maintenance requirement shall be generated by this equipment and indicate a need for operational restrictions when necessary depending on the extent of the wheelset bearing deterioration.
The detection system shall be located entirely on board and diagnosis messages shall be communicated to the driver.
Specification and assessment method for on board detection equipment are an open point
To prevent Class 1 trains triggering an incorrect alarm of trackside hot axle box detection (HABD) equipment, Class 1 trains shall have no component (other than axle boxes), or vehicle part, or commodity, that generates sufficient heat in the target area, defined in clause 4.2.3.3.2.3, that triggers an alarm. Where such a possibility exists then that component, vehicle part or commodity that has the possibility of generating an alarm shall be permanently shielded from the trackside HABD equipment.
It is permissible for Class 1 train axle boxes, by mutual agreement between all the infrastructure managers to whose lines the trains are intended to run and the railway undertaking, to interface with trackside HABD, in addition to the on board detection equipment, if all the requirements of clause 4.2.3.3.2.3 are fulfilled. As an alternative it is permissible by mutual agreement between infrastructure manager and railway undertaking to identify these trains by train identification systems and use the HABD information as agreed.
When, for vehicles with independent rotating wheels, inhibition of false alarms by using the train identification number is not possible, priority shall be given to the on-board detection system provided that all bearings of the wheels are monitored. The rolling stock register shall indicate if the axle boxes that have the possibility of generating an alarm are or are not shielded permanently from the trackside HABD equipment.
4.2.3.3.2.2. Class 2 trains
It is not required to equip Class 2 trains with on board detection system unless their hot axle box bearings cannot be detected by the systems of trackside detection defined in TSI Control-Command Signalling TSI: 2006 Annex A Appendix 2.
Where a Class 2 train is equipped with on board detection system for wheelset bearing health monitoring equipment the requirements of clause 4.2.3.3.2.1 shall be applied.
The wheelset bearing health of Class 2 trains, that are not equipped with on board wheelset bearing health monitoring equipment, shall be able to be monitored by trackside Hot Axle Box Detector (HABD) equipment to detect abnormal wheelset bearing temperature rises, and shall meet the vehicle interface requirements set out in clause 4.2.3.3.2.3.
4.2.3.3.2.3. Hot axle box detection for Class 2 trains
4.2.3.3.2.3.1. General
The minimum area on a vehicle that shall remain clear for the observation and measurement of axle box temperatures by trackside HABD equipment, known as the target area (TA), shall comply with the requirements given in clause 4.2.3.3.2.3.3 and 4.2.3.3.2.3.4.
4.2.3.3.2.3.2. Functional requirements for the vehicle
The vehicle's axle box shall be designed such that the maximum temperature difference between the loaded zone of the bearing and the target area shall not exceed 20 °C when assessed by the methods defined in Annex 6 of EN12082:1998, Rig performance test.
A minimum of three alarm trigger levels shall apply to Class 2 trains on the axle box target area temperatures (Taxle box) as measured by the trackside HABD equipment:
(a) |
Warm alarm: Taxle box open point °C |
(b) |
Hot alarm: Taxle box open point °C |
(c) |
Difference alarm (Difference between the temperature of the right and the left bearing of a wheelset = ΔTdiff): ΔTdiff open point °C |
As an alternative to this requirement on alarm trigger levels, it is permissible by mutual agreement between the infrastructure-manager and the railway undertaking to identify trains by train identification systems and use specific alarm trigger levels as agreed, that are different from the above levels. Specific alarm trigger levels shall be listed in the rolling stock register
4.2.3.3.2.3.3. Transverse dimensions and height above rail level of the target area
For rolling stock intended to be used on 1 435 mm track gauge the target area on the underside of an axle box, that shall remain un-obstructed to permit observation by a trackside HABD, shall occupy a minimum uninterrupted length of 50mm within a minimum transverse distance from the wheelset-centre of 1 040 mm and a maximum transverse distance from the wheelset centre of 1 120 mm at a height above the top of the rail between 260 mm and 500 mm.
4.2.3.3.2.3.4. Longitudinal dimension of the target area
The longitudinal dimension on the underside of the axle box that shall remain unobstructed to permit observation by a trackside HABD (see Figure 1) shall:
— |
be centred on the wheelset’s centreline, |
— |
have a minimum length Lmin (mm) = 130mm for Class 1 trains where used |
— |
have a minimum length Lmin (mm) =100mm for Class 2 trains |
4.2.3.3.2.3.5. Limit criteria outside of the target area
To prevent unwanted activation of the trackside HABD, in the vertical plane and over a minimum longitudinal length of LE mm (= 500 mm) centred on the wheelset centreline:
(a) |
No component, or vehicle part, or commodity that has a temperature greater than that of the axle box (e.g. hot load, engine exhaust) shall be located within the longitudinal limit of LE mm and at a distance of less than 10 mm from either outer edge of the target area's transverse limits (as given in 4.2.3.3.2.3.3) unless it is shielded from observation by the trackside HABD. |
(b) |
No component, vehicle part or commodity that has the potential to increase the temperature of a component or part that lies within the longitudinal limit of LE mm and the target area transverse limits to a temperature above that of the wheelset-box (e.g. engine exhaust), shall be located at a distance of less than 100 mm from either outer edge of the target area's transverse limits (as shown in 4.2.3.3.2.3.3) unless it is shielded and prevented from causing an increase in temperature of any part within that area. |
4.2.3.3.2.3.6. Emissivity
In order to maximise the emissivity of the observed target area surface and to limit stray radiation from the axle box, the underside surfaces of the axle box and its immediate environment shall be designed to have a matt finish and be painted with dark paint of a matt finish. The paint used shall be to a specification of a maximum 5 % specular reflection in its new state (as defined in clause 3.1 of EN ISO 2813:1999) and be appropriate for the axle box surfaces to which it is applied.
Figure 1
4.2.3.4. Rolling stock dynamic behaviour
4.2.3.4.1. General
The dynamic behaviour of a vehicle has a strong influence on safety against derailment, running safety and track loading. The vehicle dynamic behaviour is mainly determined by:
— |
the maximum speed |
— |
the maximum designed cant deficiency for the rolling stock |
— |
wheel/rail contact parameters (wheel and rail profile, track gauge) |
— |
mass and inertia of the car body, bogies and wheelsets |
— |
suspension characteristic of the vehicles |
— |
track irregularities |
In order to ensure safety against derailment and running safety, as well as to avoid overloading of the track, an acceptance procedure test shall be carried out for vehicles which:
— |
are newly developed, |
— |
have had relevant design modifications that could affect safety against derailment, running safety or track loading or |
— |
have had changes in their operating regimes that could affect safety against derailment, running safety or track loading. |
The acceptance procedure tests for safety against derailment, running safety and track loading shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant requirements in EN14363:2005 The parameters described in 4.2.3.4.2 and 4.2.3.4.3, below, shall be assessed (using the normal or simplified method as permitted in EN14363:2005 Clause 5.2.2). More details about these parameters are given in EN14363:2005.
The EN14363 takes account of the present state of the art. However the requirements are not always achievable in the following areas:
— |
track geometric quality |
— |
combinations of speed, curvature, cant deficiency. |
These requirements remain as open points within this TSI.
The tests shall be carried out under a range of conditions of speed, cant deficiency, track quality and curve radius appropriate for the application of the vehicle.
The track geometric quality for the tests shall be representative of the service routes and shall be included in the test report. The methodology of EN14363 Annex C shall be used with the specified QN1 and QN2 values taken as guidance. However they do not represent the range of geometric quality that may occur.
Some aspects of EN14363 are also not consistent with the requirements of the HS RST TSI:
— |
contact geometry |
— |
oading conditions. |
In accordance with EN14363:2005 it is permitted to deviate from the requirements laid down in this clause 4.2.3.4 where evidence can be provided that safety is equivalent to that achieved by complying with these requirements.
4.2.3.4.2. Limit values for running safety
EN14363:2005 (Clauses 4.1.3, 5.5.1, 5.5.2 and appropriate sections of clauses 5.3.2, 5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.5 and 5.6) contains definitions of the frequency content, measuring methods and conditions for the parameters specified in sections a), b) and c) below.
(a) |
Transverse track forces: Rolling stock shall comply with the PRUD’HOMME criteria for the maximum transverse force ΣY defined as follows: , where ΣY is the sum of the guiding forces of a wheelset and P0 is the static load on the axle in kN defined in clause 4.2.3.2. The result of this formula defines the limit of wheel/rail adhesion between the sleeper and the ballast under the influence of transverse dynamic forces. |
(b) |
Quotient of the transverse and vertical forces of a wheel in normal operating conditions (for a Curve Radius R ≥ 250 m): The ratio of transverse to vertical force(Y/Q) of a wheel shall not exceed the limit where Y is the lateral guiding force of a wheel exerted on the rail measured in a wheelset based reference frame and Q is the vertical force of the wheel on the rail measured in the same reference frame. |
(c) |
Quotient of the transverse and vertical forces of a wheel on twisted track (For a Curve Radius R< 250m). The ratio of transverse to vertical force (Y/Q) of a wheel shall not exceed the limit . with the flange angle γ. Note: If the flange angle γ is 70 degrees the limit value (Y/Q)lim = 1,2. This limit characterises the ability of the rolling stock to run on twisted track. |
(d) |
Instability criterion Definition: On straight track or large radius curves a wheelset is running in an unstable manner if the periodic lateral movement of the wheelset exhausts the clearance between the wheel flanges and the gauge corner of the rails. In unstable motion this lateral movement is exerted over several cycles and is strongly dependent on:
and causes excessive lateral vibrations.
|
4.2.3.4.3. Track loading limit values
The frequency content, measuring methods and conditions for the parameters specified in sections a), c) and d) below are defined in EN14363:2005 (Clauses 5.5.1, 5.5.2 and appropriate sections of clauses 5.3.2, 5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.5 and 5.6).
(a) |
Vertical dynamic wheel load The maximum vertical force exerted by the wheels on the rails (dynamic wheel load, Q) shall not be more than the value given in Table 2 for the speed range of the vehicle: Table 2 Dynamic wheel load
|
(b) |
Longitudinal load In order to limit the longitudinal forces exerted on the track by the rolling stock the maximum acceleration or deceleration shall be less than 2,5 m/s2. Braking systems which dissipate kinetic energy through heating the rail shall not create braking forces of more than: case 1: 360 kN per train in the case of emergency braking, case 2: for other braking cases, such as a normal service braking for speed reduction or non repetitive braking to a halt, or repetitive braking for speed control, the use of the brake and the maximum braking force allowed shall be determined by the infrastructure manager for each line concerned. Any limitations on the braking force defined in clause 4.2.4.5 shall be justified and published in the infrastructure register and taken into account in the operating rules. |
(c) |
Quasi static guiding force Yqst Limitation of the quasi static guiding force Yqst is to avoid excessive wear of rails in curves. National rules apply (see Annex L) |
(d) |
Quasi static wheel force Qqst In order to limit the vertical forces in curves at cant deficiency and cant excess the quasi static vertical wheel force shall be less than Qqst,lim = 145 kN. |
4.2.3.4.4. Wheel/rail interface
The wheel-rail interface is fundamental for safety against derailment and for explaining the dynamic running behaviour of a railway vehicle. The wheel profile shall meet the following requirements:
(a) |
The flange angle (see Annex M) is at least 67 degrees |
(b) |
The taper angle (see Annex M) is between 3,7 and 8,5 degrees (6,5 % to 15 %). |
(c) |
The equivalent conicity is in the limits set out in Sections 4.2.3.4.6 to 4.2.3.4.8. |
4.2.3.4.5. Design for vehicle stability
Vehicles shall be designed to be stable on track meeting the requirements of the High-Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006 at the maximum vehicle design speed plus 10 %. Unstable running is defined in clause 4.2.3.4.2 (d).
Rolling stock designed for higher speeds shall still be stable when running on lines designed for lower speeds. For example, rolling stock designed for speeds >250 km/h shall still be stable when running on lines designed for speeds of the order of 200 km/h or less.
The range of values of speed and conicity for which the vehicle is designed to be stable shall be specified, certified and indicated in the rolling stock register.
If stability is dependent on the use of devices, which are not fail-safe, an on board instability alarm shall be fitted on trains with a speed that exceeds 220 km/h. The detection of instability shall be based on acceleration measurements taken on the bogie frame. This alarm shall advise the driver to reduce speed in the event of instability. The criteria for activation of this alarm shall be as defined in clause 4.2.3.4.2 d2.
4.2.3.4.6. Definition of equivalent conicity
Equivalent conicity is the tangent of the cone angle of a wheelset with coned wheels whose lateral movement has the same kinematic wavelength as the given wheelset on straight track and large-radius curves.
The limiting values for equivalent conicity quoted in the tables below shall be calculated for the amplitude (y) of the wheelset’s lateral displacement
— |
y = 3 mm, |
if (TG – SR) ≥ 7 mm |
— |
, |
if 5 mm ≤ (TG – SR) < 7 mm |
— |
y = 2 mm, |
if (TG – SR) < 5 mm |
where TG is the track gauge and SR is the distance between the active faces of the wheelset.
4.2.3.4.7. Design values for wheel profiles
Wheel profiles and the distance between active faces of the wheels (Dimension SR in Annex M) shall be selected to ensure that the equivalent conicity limits set out in Table 3 are not exceeded when the designed wheelset is modelled passing over the representative sample of track test conditions (simulated by calculation) specified in Table 4.
Table 3
Equivalent conicity design limit values
Maximum vehicle operating speed (km/h) |
Equivalent conicity limit values |
Test conditions (see Table 4) |
≥ 190 and ≤ 230 |
0,25 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 |
> 230 and ≤ 280 |
0.20 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 |
> 280 and ≤ 300 |
0,10 |
1, 3, 5 and 6 |
> 300 |
0,10 |
1 and 3 |
Table 4
Modelling track test conditions for equivalent conicity
Test condition No. |
Rail head profile |
Rail inclination |
Track gauge |
1 |
rail section 60 E 1 defined in EN 13674-1:2003 |
1 in 20 |
1 435 mm |
2 |
rail section 60 E 1 defined in EN 13674-1:2003 |
1 in 40 |
1 435 mm |
3 |
rail section 60 E 1 defined in EN 13674-1:2003 |
1 in 20 |
1 437 mm |
4 |
rail section 60 E 1 defined in EN 13674-1:2003 |
1 in 40 |
1 437 mm |
5 |
rail section 60 E 2 defined in Annex F of HS INS TSI 2006 |
1 in 40 |
1 435 mm |
6 |
rail section 60 E 2 defined in Annex F of HS INS TSI 2006 |
1 in 40 |
1 437 mm |
The requirements of this clause are deemed to have been met by wheelsets having unworn S1002 or GV 1/40 profiles, as defined in prEN13715:2006 with spacing of active faces between 1 420 mm and 1 426 mm.]
Note: Design conicity values for rail profiles are given in The High Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006. Those values are different from the values given here for wheel profiles. This difference is intentional and results from the selection of reference wheel and rail profiles for the assessment.
4.2.3.4.8. In service values of equivalent conicity
Assessment of this clause is the responsibility of the Member State(s) where the rolling stock is operated. This clause is excluded from the assessment made by a notified body.
The maintenance plan shall set out the railway undertaking's procedures for maintaining wheelsets and wheel profiles. The procedures shall take account of the conicity ranges for which the vehicle is certified (see clause 4.2.3.4.5).
Wheelsets shall be maintained to ensure (directly or indirectly) that the equivalent conicity remains within the approved limits for the vehicle when the wheelset is modelled passing over the representative sample of track test conditions (simulated by calculation) specified in Tables 4 and 5.
Table 5
Simulated track test conditions for in service values of equivalent conicity
Maximum vehicle operating speed (km/h) |
Test conditions (see Table 4) |
≥ 190 and ≤ 200 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 |
> 200 and ≤ 230 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 |
> 230 and ≤ 250 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 |
> 250 and ≤ 280 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 |
> 280 and ≤ 300 |
1, 3, 5 and 6 |
> 300 |
1 and 3 |
For a novel bogie/vehicle design, or for operation of a known vehicle on a route with relevant different characteristics, then the development of wear of a wheel profile, and therefore the change in equivalent conicity, is usually not known. For this situation a provisional maintenance plan shall be proposed. The validity of the plan shall be confirmed following monitoring of the wheel profile and equivalent conicity in service. The monitoring shall consider a representative number of wheelsets and shall take into account the variation between wheelsets in different positions in the vehicle and between different vehicle types in the trainset.
If ride instability is reported, the railway undertaking shall model the measured wheel profiles and distances between active faces of the wheels (Dimension SR in Annex M) over the representative sample of track test conditions specified in Table 5 and Table 4 to check for compliance with the maximum equivalent conicity at which the vehicle is designed and certified to be stable.
If the wheelsets comply with the maximum equivalent conicity at which the vehicle is designed and certified to be stable, the High-Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006 requires the infrastructure manager to check the track for compliance with the requirements set out in the High-Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006.
If both vehicle and track comply with the requirements of the relevant TSIs, a joint investigation by the railway undertaking and the infrastructure manager shall be undertaken to determine the reason for the instability.
4.2.3.4.9. Wheelsets
4.2.3.4.9.1. Wheelsets
(a) |
Geometrical dimensions The maximum and minimum dimensions for wheelsets for standard track gauge (1 435 mm) are given in Annex M. |
(b) |
Requirements linked to control-command and signalling subsystem The requirements related to electrical resistance of wheelsets linked to control-command and signalling subsystem are specified in clause 4.2.3.3.1. |
4.2.3.4.9.2. Interoperability Constituent Wheels
(a) |
Geometrical dimensions The maximum and minimum dimensions for wheels for standard track gauge (1 435 mm) are given in Annex M. |
(b) |
Wear Criteria Characteristics To achieve a proper match between the choice of materials for the rail (as defined in the High-Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006) and the wheels, the wheels shall use materials defined as follows:
|
(c) |
Requirements linked to control-command and signalling subsystem The requirements related to geometry and material for wheels linked to control-command and signalling subsystem are specified in clause 4.2.7.9.3 |
4.2.3.4.10. Specific requirements for vehicles with independently rotating wheels
A vehicle equipped with independently rotating wheels shall have the following characteristics:
(a) |
suspension/bogie design to ensure stable behaviour of the axle/bogie in curves |
(b) |
a method to centre the axle in the track when running on straight track |
(c) |
wheel dimensions complying with the requirements given in Annex M of this TSI |
Equivalent conicity requirements (sections 4.2.3.4.6 to 4.2.3.4.8) do not apply to vehicles equipped with wheels rotating independently and therefore wheel profiles not complying with these conicity requirements may be used for vehicles with independent wheels.
The other dynamic behaviour requirements (sections 4.2.3.4.1 to 4.2.3.4.4 (b)) for vehicles with wheelsets do apply to vehicles equipped with independent wheels.
4.2.3.4.11. Detection of derailments
Derailment detection systems shall be installed on new builds of Class 1 trainsets, when their specification for interoperability is established and they are available on the market.
As long as the specification for interoperability of derailment detection systems is not available, installation of derailment detection systems is not mandatory.
4.2.3.5. Maximum train length
The length of trains shall not exceed 400 m. A tolerance of 1 % is permissible in order to improve aerodynamic penetration of the front and rear of the train.
To maximise access to the high-speed Trans European Network the maximum length of trains shall be compatible with the usable length of platform specified in the High-Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.2.3.6. Maximum gradients
Trains shall be able to start, operate and stop on the maximum gradients on all the lines for which they are designed and over which they are likely to operate.
This is of particular relevance to the performance requirements specified in this TSI.
The maximum gradients of each line are defined in the infrastructure register. Clauses 4.2.5 and 7.3.1 of the High Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006 state the maximum permitted gradients.
4.2.3.7. Minimum curve radius
This parameter is an interface with the high-speed infrastructure subsystem in that the minimum curvatures to be taken into account are defined on one hand for the high-speed tracks (based on the cant deficiency) and on the other hand for the stabling tracks. Reference shall be made to clause 2.2 of the infrastructure register and clauses 4.2.6 and 4.2.24.3 of the High-Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.2.3.8. Flange lubrication
To protect the rails and wheels against excessive wear, particularly in curves, trains shall be equipped with flange lubrication. This shall be installed as a minimum on one axle close to the leading end of a train.
After such a lubrication the wheel tread/rail contact area shall not be contaminated.
4.2.3.9. Suspension coefficient
Whenever a stationary vehicle is placed on a canted track whose running surface lies at an angle δ to the horizontal, its body leans on its suspension and forms an angle η with the perpendicular to the rail level. The vehicle suspension coefficient s is defined by the ratio:
This parameter influences the swept envelope of a vehicle. The suspension coefficient s of vehicles equipped with pantographs shall be less than 0,25. It is permissible for tilting trains not to meet this requirement providing they are equipped with pantograph compensation devices.
4.2.3.10. Sanding
Sanding devices shall be provided for improving braking and traction performance.. The amount of sand distributed along the rail is specified in clause 4.1.1 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.The maximum number of active sanding devices is defined in clause 4.1.2 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.There shall be provision on rolling stock to permit interruption of sanding:
— |
within switching zones |
— |
when at standstill except during starting and testing of the sanding devices |
— |
during braking at speeds below 20 km/h. |
4.2.3.11. Ballast pick up
This is an open point.
4.2.4. Braking
4.2.4.1. Minimum braking performance
(a) |
Trains shall incorporate a brake control system with one or more deceleration levels. The prescribed performance levels defining the minimum braking power are given in Tables 6 and 7. Meeting these performance levels and the safe operation of the braking system shall be fully demonstrated. |
(b) |
It is important to note that the values in Table 6 below are those appropriate for rolling stock and they shall not be interpreted as being the absolute values for defining the braking curves required by the control-command and signalling subsystem. |
(c) |
Performance: trains shall be able to achieve, over the range of speeds shown, the minimum mean decelerations within each the speed range shown below. Table 6 Minimum braking performance levels
te [s] = Equivalent time of application: the sum of the delay period and half of the brake force build up time, where the build up time is defined as the time needed to reach 95 % of the braking force demanded. Case A
and the worst degraded operation mode defined below:
Case B As per case A and
The complete process of assessment is described in annex P Note 1: On existing infrastructures, infrastructure managers are permitted to define further requirements because of the different Class B signalling and control systems on their part of trans-European high-speed network (see infrastructure register), e.g. additional braking systems or reduced service speeds for given braking distances. Note 2: Normal service braking conditions are defined in clause 4.2.4.4. |
(d) |
Stopping distances: The stopping distance ‘S’ calculated as a function of the minimum decelerations defined above is defined by the formula: where:
For example, using the data in Table 6, the following stopping distances to be met from specific initial speeds are given in Table 7. Table 7 Maximum stopping distance
|
(e) |
Additional conditions: For the Cases A & B, when emergency braking is considered: The contribution of electric dynamic brakes shall only be included in the calculation of the performance defined above if
It is permissible to include the contribution of braking systems that dissipate kinetic energy through heating the rails in the emergency braking performance under the conditions defined in clause 4.2.4.5. Electromagnetic brakes with magnets that are in contact with the rail shall not be employed at speeds higher than 280 km/h. It is permissible to include the contribution made by electromagnetic brakes independent of wheel rail adhesion for emergency braking on all lines as a means of maintaining the envisaged braking performance. |
4.2.4.2. Brake wheel/rail adhesion demand limits
The design of the train and the calculation of its braking performance shall not assume wheel/rail adhesion values in excess of the following values. For speeds below 200 km/h, the maximum wheel/rail adhesion coefficient demand during braking shall be assumed to be no more than 0,15. For speeds above 200 km/h, the wheel/rail adhesion coefficient maximum demand shall be assumed to decline linearly to 0,1 at 350 km/h.
A train in full service condition and with a normal load (as defined in 4.2.3.2) shall be used in calculations to verify the braking performance.
4.2.4.3. Brake system requirements
In addition to the needs listed in clauses 4.2.4.1 and 4.2.4.2, the braking system shall be proved to meet the safety objectives set within Directive 96/48/EC. This requirement is met by using for example UIC compliant braking systems.
For other braking systems, a demonstration is required to prove a level of performance at least as safe as that provided by the UIC compliant braking system.
The brake system shall meet the following requirements:
For the complete train:
— |
Use of the emergency brake, for whatever reason, shall automatically cut all traction power, without the facility of reapplying traction power while the emergency brake is being applied. |
— |
The emergency brake shall be capable of being applied at all times with the driver in his normal driving position |
— |
Vehicles shall be fitted with wheel-slide devices to control the sliding of wheels in the event of reduced adhesion between wheel and rail, |
— |
Class 1 trains shall be equipped with a wheel rotation monitoring system to advise the driver that an axle has seized. The wheel slide protection device and the rotation monitoring system shall function independently. |
— |
Emergency brake applications actuated via the driver's brake valve or additional emergency brake control as well as via the monitoring and speed control equipment shall have the following immediate and simultaneous effects:
In the case of short trains less than 250 m in length and if the equivalent time of application te of 3 s or less is met when the emergency brake is applied, it is not mandatory to interrupt re-filling of the main brake pipe.
In the case of short trains less than 250 m in length and if the equivalent time of application te of 3 s or less is met when the emergency brake is applied, it is not mandatory to control the electro pneumatic brake.
|
— |
Service braking: application of full service braking shall result in a traction cut-off without an automatic restoration of traction power. |
— |
Full service braking is defined as the braking resulting from the maximum braking force within the range of service braking before emergency braking. |
Electric braking
— |
The contribution of electric brakes shall be in accordance with requirements of clause 4.2.4.1.e |
— |
Where the electrical installations (the sub-stations) permit, the return of electrical energy generated in braking is permissible, but this shall not cause the voltage to exceed the limits defined in EN50163:2004 clause 4.1. |
All vehicles shall be provided with a means of brake isolation and indicators of brake status.
In addition, trains with a maximum speed greater than 200km/h shall be provided with a system of (brake) fault diagnostics.
4.2.4.4. Service braking performance
In addition to the specifications required in clause 4.2.4.1 ‘minimum braking characteristics’, the trains shall comply with the average decelerations in service defined in Table 8.
Table 8
Minimum mean deceleration levels for service braking
Braking mode |
te |
Minimum mean deceleration measured between end of te and reaching the target speed [m/s2] |
|||
[s] |
350-300 (km/h) |
300-230 (km/h) |
230-170 (km/h) |
170-0 (km/h) |
|
Service braking |
2 |
0,30 |
0,35 |
0,6 |
0,6 |
te [s] = Equivalent time of application |
These decelerations shall be achieved by a train on level track, in the configurations defined in clause 4.2.4.1 Cases A.
4.2.4.5. Eddy current brakes
This paragraph deals with the infrastructure subsystem interfaces relating to eddy current track brakes.
As specified in the High-Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006, the use of this type of brake, independent of wheel/rail adhesion, on the lines (to be built, upgraded or connecting) of the trans-European high-speed network is permissible as follows:
— |
For emergency braking on all lines except specific connecting lines listed in the infrastructure register. |
— |
For full or normal service braking on the sections of line where the infrastructure manager permits it. In this case the conditions of use shall be published in the infrastructure register. |
Trains equipped with this type of brake shall meet the following specifications:
— |
Brakes independent of wheel rail adhesion are permitted to be used from the maximum operating speed down to 50 km/h: (Vmax ≥ V ≥ 50 km/h) |
— |
The maximum average deceleration shall be less than 2,5 m/s2 (this value, which is an interface with the longitudinal resistance of the track, shall be met with all brakes in use). |
— |
In the worst case, that is to say with the trainsets working in multiple to their maximum permitted train length, the maximum longitudinal braking force applied to the track by the eddy current train brake shall be:
|
It is permissible to include the contribution of brakes independent of wheel/rail adhesion in the braking performance defined in clause 4.2.4.1. This is with the understanding that the safe operation of this type of brake can be assured and is not affected by any single point failure.
4.2.4.6. Protection of an immobilised train
In the event of the compressed air supply being disrupted or the power supply failing, it shall be possible to stop and hold a train with a normal load (as defined in clause 4.2.3.2) on a 35‰ gradient by using the friction brake alone, even if one distributor valve is switched off, for at least two hours.
It shall be possible to keep a train with a normal load stationary for an unlimited period on a 35‰ gradient. Should the parking brake be unable to achieve this on its own, further means of securing the train shall be available on board.
4.2.4.7. Brake performance on steep gradients
The brake thermal performance shall allow a train to run on a maximum gradient set out in clause 4.2.5 of the High Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006 at a speed of at least equivalent to 90 % of the maximum train operating speed. This thermal performance shall be used for calculating the limiting gradient where maximum train speed can be operated.
The same conditions for train loading, means of braking and rail condition apply as for emergency braking case A as defined in clauses 4.2.4.1 c and e. Compliance to this requirement shall be proven by calculation.
4.2.4.8. Brake requirements for rescue purposes
Requirements for the pneumatic brake equipment of high speed trains for towing in case of emergency rescue are as follows:
1. |
Filling time of the brake cylinder to 95 % maximum pressure: 3-5 seconds, 3-6 seconds with load-braking system. |
2. |
Release time of the brake cylinder to 0.4 bar pressure: a minimum of 5 seconds. |
3. |
Reduction in brake pipe pressure required to obtain maximum brake cylinder pressure: 1,5 ± 0,1 bar (coming from a nominal value in the brake pipe of 5,0 ± 0,05 bar). |
4. |
The sensitivity of the brake to slow decreases in brake pipe pressure shall be such, that the brake is not activated if the normal working pressure drops by 0,3 bars in one minute. |
5. |
The sensitivity of the brake to decreases in brake pipe pressure shall be such, that the brake is activated within 1,2 seconds, if the normal working pressure drops by 0,6 bar in 6 seconds. |
6. |
Each brake, including the parking brake, shall have an on/off device. |
7. |
A minimum of five steps of brake force shall be available by variation of the brake pipe pressure. |
8. |
The status (applied/released) of brakes, including the parking brake, shall be indicated. |
Where the on-board train braking system is initiated by other than pneumatic means the pneumatic information given at the coupling interface shall result in a performance equivalent to the above.
4.2.5. Passenger information and communication
4.2.5.1. Public address system
Clauses 4.2.2.8.1 and 4.2.2.8.3 of the TSI for Accessibility for Persons with Reduced Mobility shall also apply.
Trains shall be equipped as a minimum with a means of audible communication,
— |
for the train crew to address the passengers in a train |
— |
for the train crew and ground control to communicate between one another. |
— |
for internal communication between the train crew and in particular between the driver and staff in the passenger areas. |
The equipment shall be able to remain on standby and to function independently of the main energy source for at least three hours.
The communication system shall be designed in such a manner that it continues to operate at least half (distributed throughout the train) of its loudspeakers in the event of a failure in one of its transmission elements, or another mean shall be available to inform the passengers.
Apart from the passenger alarm (see clause 4.2.5.3) no specific provisions are prescribed for passengers to contact train crew.
4.2.5.2. Passenger information signs
Clause 4.2.2.8.2 of the of the TSI for Accessibility for Persons with Reduced Mobility shall also apply.
All passenger signs closely connected with safety shall use the unified sign formats given in standard ISO 3864-1:2002.
4.2.5.3. Passenger alarm
Passenger occupied areas on trains (excluding vestibules, gangways and toilets) shall be fitted with emergency signal devices. These devices shall be installed where they can be seen easily by passengers and reached by them without having to pass through an interior door.
The emergency handle shall have a clearly visible seal.
The alarm once activated shall not be capable of being disengaged by passengers. If a device is provided to indicate that the alarm has been activated, it shall be marked as indicated in Annex Q of this TSI.
Operation of the emergency signal shall be indicated next to the device used.
Activating the alarm shall:
— |
Initiate braking |
— |
Cause a visual (flashing or continuous light) and acoustic (buzzer/klaxon or spoken message) alarm to be triggered in the driver's cab; |
— |
Transmit a message (acoustic or visual signal or radio message by mobile phone) by the driver or an automatic system to the train crew working among the passengers. |
— |
Transmit an acknowledgement, recognisable by the person who triggered the signal (acoustic signal in the vehicle, braking application, etc.) |
The arrangements installed in the rolling stock (automatic brake application, in particular) shall allow the driver to intervene in the braking process so as to be able to choose the stopping point of the train.
When the train has stopped the driver shall be able to start again as soon as possible if the driver considers it safe to start again Activation of one or more than one alarm shall have no additional effect, whilst the train-crew has not rearmed the first.
Lastly a communication link between cab and train staff shall enable the driver, at his or her initiative, to investigate the reasons why the emergency signal was triggered. If in normal service no train staff is present a device shall be available for passengers to communicate to the driver in case of emergency.
4.2.6. Environmental conditions
4.2.6.1. Environmental conditions
The rolling stock and all its constituent parts shall meet the requirements of this TSI within the climatic zones T1, or T2, or T3 as specified in EN50125-1:1999 in which it is intended to run. These zones shall be indicated in the rolling stock register.
4.2.6.2. Train aerodynamic loads in open air
4.2.6.2.1. Aerodynamic loads on track workers at the lineside
A full length train running in the open air at 300 km/h or at its maximum operating speed vtr,max if lower than 300 km/h shall not cause an exceedance of the air speed u2σ at the trackside as set out in Table 9, at a height of 0,2 m above the top of rail and at a distance of 3,0 m from the track centre, during the passage of the whole train (including the wake).
For trains with a maximum speed higher than 300 km/h, the the measures to be taken by Infrastructure Manager are mentioned in clause 4.4.3 of the High Speed Infrastructure TSI.
Table 9
Trackside maximum permissible air speed
Maximum train speed vtr,max (km/h) |
Trackside maximum permissible air speed, (limit values for u2σ (m/s)) |
From 190 to 249 |
20 |
From 250 to 300 |
22 |
Test conditions
Tests shall be undertaken on ballasted, straight track. The vertical distance between the top of rail and the surrounding ground level is 0,75m ± 0,25m. The value u2σ is the upper bound of the 2σ confidence interval of the maximum resultant induced air speeds in the x-y ground plane. It shall be obtained from at least 20 independent and comparable test samples with ambient wind speeds of less than or equal to 2 m/s.
u2σ is given by:
u2σ = ū + 2σ
with
ū |
mean value of all air speed measurements uI, i ≥ 20 |
σ |
standard deviation |
Conformity assessment
Conformity shall be assessed on the basis of full-scale tests and with the maximum length of the defined formations.
Detailed specifications
Measurements shall be taken at the maximum operational speed of the train vtr,max or 300 km/h if the train maximum operating speed is higher than 300 km/h.
For a valid set of measurements, conditions for train speed vtr are:
— |
at least 50 % of the measurements shall be within ±5 % of vtr,max or 300 km/h as applicable and |
— |
100 % of the measurements shall be within ±10 % of vtr,max or 300 km/h as applicable. |
Each measurement umeasured,i shall be corrected by
ui = umeasured,i * vtr/vtr,i
The track shall have no obstacles, such as bridges or tunnels, nearer than 500m ahead and 100m after the sensors in the longitudinal direction. Groups of sensors are permitted to be used to obtain several independent measurements from one train passage. Such groups shall be spaced at least 20 m apart from each other.
The whole train-passing event shall consist of the time period starting 1 second before the passing of the train head and finishing 10 seconds after the tail passes.
The sampling rate of the sensor shall be at least 10 Hz. The signal shall be filtered using a 1 second window moving average filter. The ambient wind speed shall be determined at the first sensor at a height of 0,2 m above top of rail.
The ambient wind speed is equivalent to the mean wind speed in the 3-second interval occurring before the train head passes the wind sensor. The ambient wind speed shall be less than or equal to 2 m/s.
The uncertainty in the air speed measurements shall be determined and shall not exceed ±3 %.
The uncertainty in the train speed measurement shall be determined and shall not exceed ±1 %.
4.2.6.2.2. Aerodynamic loads on passengers on a platform
A full length train, running in the open air at a reference speed vtr = 200 km/h, (or at its maximum operating speed vtr,max, if this is lower than 200 km/h), shall not cause the air speed to exceed value u2σ = 15,5 m/s at a height of 1,2 m above the platform and at a distance of 3,0 m from the track centre, during the whole train passage (including the wake).
Test conditions
The assessment shall either be made on a
— |
platform of height 240 mm above rail level or lower if one is available |
— |
or the applicant shall select the lowest height of platform passed by the train to be used for the assessment. |
The platform height used in the assessment shall be recorded in the rolling stock register. If the assessment is successful for a platform height of 240 mm or lower, the train shall be deemed to be acceptable for all lines.
The value u2σ is the upper bound of the 2σ confidence interval of the maximum resultant induced air speeds in the x-y platform plane. It shall be based on at least 20 separate measurements and under similar test conditions with ambient wind speeds of less than or equal to 2 m/s.
u2σ is given by:
u2σ = ū + 2σ
with
ū |
mean value of all air speed measurements ui, i ≥ 20 |
σ |
standard deviation |
Conformity assessment
Conformity shall be assessed on the basis of full-scale tests and with the maximum length of the defined formations.
Detailed specifications
Measurements shall be taken at vtr = 200 km/h or, if it is lower, with the maximum operational speed of the train, vtr,max.
For a valid set of measurements, conditions for train speed vtr are:
— |
at least 50 % of the measurements shall be within ±5 % of vtr,max or 200 km/h as applicable and |
— |
100 % of the measurements shall be within ±10 % of vtr,max or 200 km/h as applicable. |
Each measurement, umeasured,I, shall be corrected by
ui = umeasured,i * 200 km/h/vtr,i
or, for vtr,max < 200 km/h,
ui = umeasured,i * vtr,max/vtr,i
The platform shall have no obstacles ahead of and after the sensors in the longitudinal direction. The platform shall have a constant geometry for a distance of 150 m ahead of the sensors in the longitudinal direction and shall not have a roof or canopy or backwall. A number of sensors are permitted to be used to obtain several independent measurements from one train passage. Such sensors shall be separated from each other by a distance of at least 20 m.
The whole train-passing event consists of the time period starting 1 second before the passing of the train head and finishing 10 seconds after the tail passes.
The sampling rate of the sensor shall be at least 10 Hz. The signal shall be filtered using a 1 second window moving average filter.
The wind speed shall be determined by the first sensor on the platform or by a separate wind sensor installed 1,2 m above platform. The ambient wind speed is equivalent to the mean wind speed in the 3-second interval occurring before the train passes the wind sensor. The ambient wind speed shall be less than or equal to 2 m/s.
The uncertainty in the air speed measurements shall be determined and shall not exceed ±3 %.
The uncertainty in the train speed measurement shall be determined and shall not exceed ±1 %.
4.2.6.2.3. Pressure loads in open air
A full length train, running at a given speed (reference case) in the open air shall not cause the maximum peak-to-peak pressure of changes to exceed a value Δp2σ as set out in Table 10 over the range of heights 1,5 m to 3,3 m above the top of rail, and at a distance of 2,5 m from the track centre, during the whole train passage (including the passing of the head, couplings and tail). The maximum peak-to-peak pressure changes are tabulated below:
Table 10
Maximum permissible pressure changes in open air
Train |
Reference train speed |
Maximum permissible pressure change Δp2σ |
Class 1 |
250 km/h |
795 Pa |
Class 2 |
At maximum speed |
720 Pa |
Conformity assessment
Conformity shall be assessed on the basis of full-scale tests and with a maximum length of the defined formations.
Detailed specifications
Tests shall be undertaken on ballasted, straight track. The vertical distance between the top of rail and the surrounding ground level is 0,75m ± 0,25m. The considered event shall be that of a whole train passing and shall consist of the time period starting 1 second before the passing of the train head and finishing 10 seconds after the train tail passes.
The measurements shall be taken at 1,5 m, 1,8 m, 2,1 m, 2,4 m, 2,7 m, 3,0 m and 3,3 m height above the top of rail and shall be analysed separately for each measuring position. For any position the Δp2σ-requirement needs to be fulfilled.
The value Δp2σ shall be the upper bound of a 2σ interval of (pmax – pmin) based on at least 10 independent and comparable test samples (at a certain measuring height) with ambient wind speeds of less than or equal to 2 m/s.
Δp2σ is given by:
with
|
mean value of all peak-to-peak pressure measurements Δpi, i ≥ 10 |
σ |
standard deviation |
A number of sensors are permitted to be used to obtain several independent measurements from one train passage. Such sensors shall be separated from each other by a distance of at least 20 m.
For a valid set of measurements, conditions for train speed vtr are:
— |
at least 50 % of the measurements shall be within ±5 % of the reference train speed and |
— |
100 % of the measurements shall be within ±10 % of the reference train speed. |
The wind speed and direction shall be determined using a meteorological station installed near to the pressure measurement location, at 2 m above the top of rail and at 4 m distance to the track. The ambient wind speed shall be equivalent to the mean wind speed in the 15 second interval occurring before the train head passes the wind sensor. The ambient wind shall be less than or equal to 2 m/s.
The pressure sensors used shall be capable of measuring the pressure with a minimum of 150 Hz resolution. All pressure sensors shall be connected to the static pressure opening of Prandtl tubes directed in longitudinal x-direction. It is permitted to use a method that is proven to be equivalent.
The uncertainty in the pressure measurements shall be determined and shall not exceed ±2 %.
The uncertainty in the train speed measurement shall be determined and shall not exceed ±1 %.
The pressure signal shall be analogue low pass filtered with a 75 Hz 6 pole Butterworth low pass filter or equivalent. For each pressure sensor and run the maximum pressure peak-to-peak value during the whole passage Δpm,i shall be computed and then corrected to the investigated train speed vtr and to standard density ρo. using the following formula
with:
Δpi |
: |
the corrected peak-to-peak pressure change |
Δpm,i |
: |
the measured peak-to-peak pressure change for sample i |
ρi |
: |
the air density measured at the test site for sample i |
vw,x,i |
: |
the measured wind speed component in x-direction for sample i |
vtr,i |
: |
the measured train speed for sample i |
vtr |
: |
the investigated train speed |
ρo |
: |
the standard density of 1,225 kg/m3 |
4.2.6.3. Crosswind
A train is deemed to meet the crosswind requirements if its characteristic wind curves (CWC: as defined in Annex G) of its most wind sensitive vehicle are superior or at least equivalent to a set of characteristic reference wind curves (CRWC).
The set of CRWC to assess conformity of rolling stock is given in the Tables 11, 12, 13 and 14 for Class 1 vehicles for which the characteristic wind curves (CWC) shall calculated according to the method detailed in Annex G.
Limiting values and corresponding methods for Class 1 tilting trains and Class 2 vehicles is an open issue.
Table 11
Reference characteristic wind speeds for angle βw=90° (vehicle on straight track with a lateral uncompensated acceleration: aq = 0 m/s2).
Train speed |
Reference characteristic wind speed for the flat ground case (without ballast and rails) in m/s |
Reference characteristic wind speed for the embankment case in m/s |
120 km/h |
38,0 |
34,1 |
160 km/h |
36,4 |
31,3 |
200 km/h |
34,8 |
28,5 |
250 km/h |
32,8 |
25,0 |
steps of 50 km/h up to vtr,max |
see lines below |
see lines below |
Maximum train speed |
Reference characteristic wind speed for the flat ground case (without ballast and rails) in m/s |
Reference characteristic wind speed for the embankment case in m/s |
vtr,max= 260 km/h |
32,4 |
24,5 |
vtr,max= 270 km/h |
32,0 |
24,0 |
vtr,max= 280 km/h |
31,6 |
23,5 |
vtr,max= 290 km/h |
31,2 |
23,0 |
vtr,max= 300 km/h |
30,8 |
22,5 |
vtr,max= 310 km/h |
30,4 |
22,0 |
vtr,max= 320 km/h |
30,0 |
21,5 |
vtr,max= 330 km/h |
29,6 |
21,0 |
vtr,max= 340 km/h |
29,2 |
20,5 |
vtr,max= 350 km/h |
28,8 |
20,0 |
As an example the table shall be used as follows: For a maximum train speed of 330 km/h, the CWC values shall be assessed at the following speeds 120 km/h, 160 km/h, 200 km/h, 250 km/h, 300 km/h and 330 km/h.
Table 12
Reference characteristic wind speeds for angle βw=90° (vehicle in a curve with aq = 0,5 m/s2 and with aq = 1,0 m/s2).
Train speed |
Reference characteristic wind speed for the flat ground case (without ballast and rails) in m/s for lateral acceleration aq = 0,5 m/s2 |
Reference characteristic wind speed for the flat ground case (without ballast and rails) in m/s for lateral acceleration aq = 1,0 m/s2 |
250 km/h |
29,5 |
26,0 |
steps of 50 km/h up to vtr,max |
see lines below |
see lines below |
Maximum train speed |
Reference characteristic wind speed for the flat ground case (without ballast and rails) in m/s for lateral acceleration aq = 0,5 m/s2 |
Reference characteristic wind speed for the flat ground case (without ballast and rails) in m/s for lateral acceleration aq = 1,0 m/s2 |
vtr,max= 260 km/h |
29,1 |
25,6 |
vtr,max= 270 km/h |
28,7 |
25,2 |
vtr,max= 280 km/h |
28,3 |
24,8 |
vtr,max= 290 km/h |
27,9 |
24,4 |
vtr,max= 300 km/h |
27,5 |
24,0 |
vtr,max= 310 km/h |
27,1 |
23,6 |
vtr,max= 320 km/h |
26,7 |
23,2 |
vtr,max= 330 km/h |
26,3 |
22,8 |
vtr,max= 340 km/h |
25,9 |
22,4 |
vtr,max= 350 km/h |
25,5 |
22,0 |
Table 13
Reference Characteristic wind speeds for vtr= vtr,max (vehicle on flat ground without ballast and rails on straight track).
Considered max. train speed |
Reference characteristic wind speed in m/s for angle βw |
|||||||
|
80° |
70° |
60° |
50° |
40° |
30° |
20° |
10° |
vtr,max= 250 km/h |
32,5 |
33,2 |
35,0 |
38,2 |
43,6 |
45 |
45 |
— |
vtr,max= 260 km/h |
32,1 |
32,8 |
34,5 |
37,7 |
43,0 |
45 |
45 |
— |
vtr,max= 270 km/h |
31,7 |
32,4 |
34,1 |
37,3 |
42,5 |
45 |
45 |
— |
vtr,max= 280 km/h |
31,3 |
32,0 |
33,7 |
36,8 |
42,0 |
45 |
45 |
— |
vtr,max= 290 km/h |
30,9 |
31,5 |
33,3 |
36,3 |
41,4 |
45 |
45 |
— |
vtr,max= 300 km/h |
30,5 |
31,1 |
32,8 |
35,9 |
40,9 |
45 |
45 |
— |
vtr,max= 310 km/h |
30,1 |
30,7 |
32,4 |
35,4 |
40,4 |
45 |
45 |
— |
vtr,max= 320 km/h |
29,7 |
30,3 |
32,0 |
34,9 |
39,8 |
45 |
45 |
— |
vtr,max= 330 km/h |
29,3 |
29,9 |
31,6 |
34,5 |
39,3 |
45 |
45 |
— |
vtr,max= 340 km/h |
28,9 |
29,5 |
31,1 |
34,0 |
38,8 |
45 |
45 |
— |
vtr,max= 350 km/h |
28,5 |
29,1 |
30,7 |
33,5 |
38,2 |
45 |
45 |
— |
Table 14
Reference characteristic wind speeds for vtr= vtr,max (vehicle on a 6m embankment on straight track).
Considered max. train speed |
Reference characteristic wind speed in m/s for angle βw |
|||||||
|
80° |
70° |
60° |
50° |
40° |
30° |
20° |
10° |
vtr,max= 250 km/h |
24,6 |
25,0 |
26,1 |
28,4 |
32,0 |
38,1 |
45 |
45 |
vtr,max= 260 km/h |
24,1 |
24,5 |
25,6 |
27,8 |
31,4 |
37,4 |
45 |
45 |
vtr,max= 270 km/h |
23,6 |
24,0 |
25,1 |
27,2 |
30,7 |
36,6 |
45 |
45 |
vtr,max= 280 km/h |
23,1 |
23,5 |
24,6 |
26,7 |
30,1 |
35,8 |
45 |
45 |
vtr,max= 290 km/h |
22,6 |
23,0 |
24,1 |
26,1 |
29,5 |
35,1 |
45 |
45 |
vtr,max= 300 km/h |
22,1 |
22,5 |
23,5 |
25,5 |
28,8 |
34,3 |
45 |
45 |
vtr,max= 310 km/h |
21,7 |
22,0 |
23,0 |
25,0 |
28,2 |
33,5 |
43,0 |
45 |
vtr,max= 320 km/h |
21,2 |
21,5 |
22,5 |
24,4 |
27,5 |
32,8 |
42,1 |
45 |
vtr,max= 330 km/h |
20,7 |
21,0 |
22,0 |
23,8 |
26,9 |
32,0 |
41,1 |
45 |
vtr,max= 340 km/h |
20,2 |
20,5 |
21,4 |
23,2 |
26,3 |
31,3 |
40,1 |
45 |
vtr,max= 350 km/h |
19,7 |
20,0 |
20,9 |
22,7 |
25,6 |
30,5 |
39,1 |
45 |
Superiority or equivalence to the reference curves is given if all the CWC-points relevant for the comparison are equal to or higher than the corresponding ones of the reference set.
4.2.6.4. Maximum pressure variations in tunnels
Rolling stock shall be aerodynamically designed so that for a given combination (reference case) of train speed and tunnel cross section in case of a solo run in a simple, non-inclined tube-like tunnel (without any shafts etc.) a requirement for the characteristic pressure variation shall be met. The requirements are given in the Table 15.
Table 15
Requirements for interoperable train in a solo-run in a non-inclined tube-like tunnel.
Train Type |
Reference Case |
Criteria for the Reference Case |
|||
vtr [km/h] |
Atu [m2] |
ΔpN [Pa] |
ΔpN+ΔpFr [Pa] |
ΔpN+ΔpFr+ΔpT [Pa] |
|
vtr,max < 250 km/h |
200 |
53,6 |
≤ 1 750 |
≤ 3 000 |
≤ 3 700 |
vtr,max≥ 250 km/h |
250 |
63,0 |
≤ 1 600 |
≤ 3 000 |
≤ 4 100 |
Where vtr is the train speed and Atu is the tunnel cross sectional area.
Conformity shall be proven on the basis of full-scale tests, carried out at reference speed or at a higher speed in a tunnel with a cross-sectional area as close to the reference case as possible. Transfer to the reference condition shall be done with validated simulation software.
When assessing conformity of whole trains or trainsets, assessment shall be made with the maximum length of the train or coupled trainsets up to 400 m.
When assessing conformity of locomotives or driving coaches, assessment shall be done on a basis of two arbitrary train compositions of minimum length 150 m, one with a leading locomotive or driving coach (to check the ΔpN) and one with a locomotive or a driving coach at the end (to check ΔpT). ΔpFr is set to 1250 Pa (for trains with vtr,max < 250 km/h) or to 1400 Pa (for trains with vtr,max ≥ 250 km/h).
When assessing conformity of coaches only, assessment shall be done on the basis of one 400 m long train. ΔpN is set to 1750 Pa and ΔpT to 700 Pa (for trains with vtr,max < 250 km/h) or to 1600 Pa and 1100 Pa (for trains with vtr,max ≥ 250 km/h).
For the distance xp between the entrance portal and the measuring position, the definitions of ΔpFr, ΔpN, ΔpT, the minimum tunnel length and further information about the derivation of the characteristic pressure variation see EN14067-5:2006.
4.2.6.5. Exterior noise
4.2.6.5.1. Introduction
Noise emitted by rolling stock subdivides into stationary noise, starting noise, and pass-by noise.
The stationary noise is highly influenced by auxiliaries, such as cooling systems, air conditioning and compressors.
Starting noise is a combination of contributions from traction components such as diesel engines and cooling fans, auxiliaries and, sometimes, wheel slip.
Pass-by noise is highly influenced by the rolling noise, linked to the wheel/rail interaction, which is a function of speed, and at higher speeds, by aerodynamic noise.
The rolling noise itself is caused by the combined wheel and rail roughness and by the dynamic behaviour of the track and wheelset.
In addition to the rolling noise, at low speed, the noise of auxiliaries and traction equipment is also significant.
The emitted level of noise is characterised by:
— |
Sound pressure level (measured by a specified method, including specified microphone position), |
— |
Speed of the rolling stock, |
— |
Rail roughness, |
— |
Dynamic and sound radiation behaviour of the track. |
The parameters set for the characterisation of stationary noise comprise:
— |
Sound pressure level, (measured by a specified method, including specified microphone position), |
— |
Operating conditions. |
4.2.6.5.2. Limits for stationary noise
The limits for stationary noise are defined at a distance of 7,5 m from the centreline of the track, 1,2 m above the upper surface of the rails. The vehicles under test shall be in service retention mode; that is rheostatic ventilation off and air brake compressor off, HVAC normal (not preconditioning mode) and all other equipment in normal operating condition. The measuring conditions are defined by the standard EN ISO 3095:2005 with the deviations defined in Annex N of this TSI. The parameter for the sound pressure level is LpAeq,T. The limiting values for the noise emission of the vehicles under the conditions mentioned above are given in Table 16.
Table 16
Limiting values LpAeq,T for the stationary noise of rolling stock. The specified level for stationary noise is the energy-average of all measured values taken at the measuring points defined in Annex N 1.1 of this TSI.
Vehicles |
LpAeq,T[dB(A)] |
|
Class 1 |
Class 2 |
|
Electric locomotives |
|
75 |
Diesel locomotives |
|
75 |
Electric trainsets |
68 |
68 |
Diesel trainsets |
|
73 |
Passenger coaches |
|
65 |
4.2.6.5.3. Limits for starting noise
The limits for starting noise are defined at a distance of 7,5 m from the centreline of the track, 1,2 m above the upper surface of the rails. The measuring conditions are defined by the standard EN ISO 3095:2005 with the deviations defined in Annex N1.2 The indicator for the sound level is LpAFmax. The limiting values for the starting noise of the vehicles under the conditions stated above are given in Table 17.
Table 17
Limiting values LpAFmax for the starting noise of rolling stock
Vehicles |
LpAFmax[dB(A)] |
Electric locomotives P ≥ 4 500 kW at the wheel rim |
85 |
Electric locomotives P < 4 500 kW at the wheel rim |
82 |
Diesel locomotives |
89 |
Class 2 Electric trainsets |
82 |
Class 1 Electric trainsets |
85 |
Diesel trainsets |
85 |
4.2.6.5.4. Limits for pass-by noise
The limits for pass-by noise are defined at a distance of 25 m from the centreline of the reference track, 3,5 m above the upper surface of the rails for a vehicle speed indicated in Table 18 below. The indicator for the A weighted equivalent continuous sound level is LpAeq,Tp.
The measurements shall be carried out in accordance with EN ISO 3095:2005 with deviations stated in Annex N1.3 and N1.4.
The test train shall consist of:
— |
In the case of a trainset, the trainset itself |
— |
In the case of locomotive, the locomotive to be tested plus four coaches. The pass-by noise of these four coaches LpAeq,Tp measured at 7,5 m from the track centre 1,2 m above the top of rail and at 200 km/h on the reference track shall not exceed 92 dB (A). Alternatively two locomotives of the same type and 8 coaches are permitted to be used in any configuration |
— |
In the case of coaches, the four coaches to be tested plus one locomotive. The pass-by noise of the locomotive LpAeq,Tp measured at 7,5 m from the track centre 1,2 m above the top of rail and at 200 km/h on the reference track shall not exceed 97 dB (A). Alternatively two locomotives of the same type and 8 coaches are permitted to be used in any configuration. |
The two latter cases are defined as a ‘variable formation’ in this section.
The limiting values for the noise emission of the full test train LpAeq,Tp at 25 m 3,5 m above top of rail are given in Table 18.
Table 18
Limiting values LpAeq,Tp for the pass-by noise of rolling stock
Rolling stock |
Speed [km/h] |
||||
200 |
250 |
300 |
320 |
||
Class 1 |
Trainset |
|
87 dB(A) |
91 dB(A) |
92 dB(A) |
Class 2 |
Trainset or variable formations |
88 dB(A) |
|
|
|
A margin of 1 dB(A) is accepted on the values given in table 18
4.2.6.6. Exterior electromagnetic interference
For trains, with all forms of traction, the generation and distribution of electrical energy causes interference of high or low intensity by conduction (e.g. through the catenary and rail) and by electromagnetic radiation. In addition, on-board equipment can cause interference.
4.2.6.6.1. Interference generated on the signalling system and the telecommunications network:
Open point
4.2.6.6.2. Electromagnetic interference:
In order to avoid degrading the proper operation of rolling stock due to electromagnetic interference, the requirements of the following standards shall be met:
— |
EN 50121-3-1:2000 for the total rolling stock subsystem, |
— |
EN 50121-3-2:2000 for the different kinds of on-board equipment susceptible to interference. |
4.2.7. System protection
4.2.7.1. Emergency exits
4.2.7.1.1. Passengers’ emergency exits
A. Arrangement
Emergency exits shall conform to the following rules:
— |
The distance between each passenger seat and an emergency exit shall always be less than 16 m. |
— |
There shall be a minimum of two emergency exits in each vehicle accommodating 40 passengers or less. There shall be three or more in each vehicle accommodating more than 40 passengers. It is not permitted to place all the emergency exits exclusively on one side of the vehicle. |
— |
The minimum dimensions of the opening through the emergency exits shall be 700 mm x 550 mm. It is permissible to position seats in this area. |
B. Operation
External access doors shall be used as emergency exits as a priority. If this is not possible, it shall be possible to use the following as emergency routes either separately or in combination:
— |
designated windows, by ejection of the window or glazing or by breaking the glass, |
— |
compartment and gangway doors, by rapid removal of the door or breaking the glass, |
— |
external access doors, by ejecting them or breaking the glass. |
C. Signage
Emergency exits shall be clearly identified to passengers and rescue teams by means of suitable signs.
D. Evacuation via the doors
Trains shall be equipped with emergency devices (emergency steps or ladders) allowing the evacuation of passengers via access doors when not present at a platform
4.2.7.1.2. Driver's cab emergency exits
In an emergency, evacuation from the driver's cab (or access to the interior of the train by the emergency services) shall normally be by means of the access doors specified in clause 4.2.2.6.a.
Where the doors do not give direct external access, each driver's cab shall be provided with an appropriate means of evacuation through the side windows or through the trap doors, on both sides of the cab. These emergency exits shall each have minimum dimensions of 500 mm by 400 mm to allow for the release of trapped persons.
4.2.7.2. Fire safety
For the purpose of this clause the following definitions apply:
Electrical supply line: The line between the current collector or current source and the main circuit breaker or the main fuse(s) on the vehicle.
Traction circuit equipment: Both the traction module as defined in clause 4.2.8.1 and the power equipment feeding the traction module from the electrical supply line
4.2.7.2.1. Introduction
This section states requirements to prevent, detect and limit the effects of a train fire.
Two categories are defined in this section, Category A and Category B, defined as follows:
category A Fire safety:
Category A Fire safety rolling stock is designed and built to operate on infrastructure with tunnels and/or elevated sections of maximum length of 5km. Successive tunnels are not considered as one tunnel if both of the two following requirements are fulfilled:
— |
the separation between them in open air is longer than 500 m |
— |
there is an access/egress facility to a safe area within the open section |
category B Fire safety
Category B Fire safety rolling stock is designed and built to operate on all infrastructures (including those with tunnels and/or elevated sections with lengths exceeding 5 km).
For category B fire safety rolling stock additional measures set out in clauses 4.2.7.2.3.3 and 4.2.7.2.4 are required to improve the probability that a train will continue to operate in the event that a fire is detected as it enters a tunnel. These measures are intended to enable a train to reach a suitable place to stop and allow passengers and staff to be evacuated from the train to a place of safety.
There are no additional requirements for rolling stock relating to tunnels longer than 20 km because these tunnels are specially equipped to be safe for trains compliant with this TSI. Details remain an open point in the High Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.2.7.2.2. Measures to prevent fire
Materials and components selection shall take into account their fire behaviour properties.
Design measures shall be implemented in order to prevent ignition.
The conformity requirements are addressed in Clause7.1.6
4.2.7.2.3. Measures to detect/control fire
4.2.7.2.3.1. Fire detection
The high fire risk areas on rolling stock shall be equipped with a system that can detect fire in an early stage and that can initiate appropriate automatic actions to minimize the subsequent risk to passengers and train staff.
This requirement shall be deemed to be satisfied by the verification of conformity to the following requirements:
— |
The rolling stock shall be equipped with a fire detection system that can detect a fire in an early stage in the following areas:
|
— |
Upon activation of the detection system of a technical area, the following automatic actions shall be required:
|
— |
Upon activation of the detection system of a sleeping compartment, the following automatic actions shall be required:
|
4.2.7.2.3.2. Fire extinguisher
The rolling stock shall be equipped with adequate and sufficient portable water plus additive type fire extinguishers in accordance with the requirements of EN3-3:1994; EN3-6:1999: and EN3-7:2004 at appropriate locations.
4.2.7.2.3.3. Fire resistance
For category B fire safety, the rolling stock shall be equipped with adequate fire barriers and partitions at appropriate locations.
The conformity with this requirement shall be deemed to be satisfied by the verification of conformity to the following requirements:
— |
The rolling stock shall be equipped with full cross section partitions within passenger/staff areas of each vehicle, with a maximum separation of 28m which shall satisfy requirements for integrity for a minimum of 15 minutes. (Assuming the fire can start from either side of the partition) |
— |
The rolling stock shall be equipped with fire barriers that shall satisfy requirements for integrity and heat insulation for a minimum of 15 minutes.
|
The test shall be carried out in accordance with the requirements of EN 1363-1:1999 partition test.
4.2.7.2.4. Additional measures to improve running capability
4.2.7.2.4.1. Trains of all categories of fire safety
These measures are applicable to rolling stock designated as category A or B fire safety of this TSI.
These measures are required to improve the probability that a train will continue to operate for 4 minutes in the event that a fire is detected as the train enters a tunnel section. This requirement is made so that the train will reach a suitable place to stop and allow passengers and staff to be evacuated from the train to a place of safety.
This requirement shall be deemed to be satisfied by a failure mode analysis relating to the following requirement:
The brakes shall not automatically apply to bring the train to a halt as a result of system failure caused by a fire assuming the fire is in a technical compartment or cabinet, sealed or unsealed, containing electrical supply line and/or traction circuit equipment or a technical area with a combustion engine.
4.2.7.2.4.2. Category B fire safety
These measures are applicable to rolling stock designated as category B fire safety only of this TSI.
These measures are required to improve the probability that a train will continue to operate for 15 minutes in the event that a fire is detected as the train enters a tunnel. This requirement is made so that the train will reach a suitable place to stop and allow passengers and staff to be evacuated from the train to a place of safety.
This requirement shall be deemed to be satisfied by a failure mode analysis relating to the following requirements:
— |
Brakes — The brakes shall not automatically apply to bring the train to a halt as a result of system failure caused by a fire assuming the fire is in a technical compartment or cabinet, sealed or unsealed, containing electrical supply line and/or traction circuit equipment or a technical area with a combustion engine. |
— |
Traction — 50 % minimum traction redundancy as defined in clause 4.2.8.1 shall be available in degraded mode running capability, assuming the source of the fire is in a technical compartment/cabinet, sealed or unsealed, with electrical supply line and/or traction circuit equipment or a technical area with a combustion engine. If this redundancy requirement cannot be satisfied for reason of traction equipment architecture (e. g. traction equipment in one single place of the train), an automatic fire extinguishing system shall be provided in the locations described in this bullet point. |
4.2.7.2.5. Specific measures for tanks containing flammable liquids
4.2.7.2.5.1. General
Transformer tanks are included only if they contain flammable liquids
Where partition walls divide tanks internally, the complete tank shall fulfil the requirements.
Tanks shall be built, located or protected so that they or their piping cannot be punctured or fractured by debris thrown up from the track. Tanks shall not be installed in
— |
crash energy absorption zones; |
— |
passenger seating areas and areas of temporary occupation by passengers; |
— |
luggage compartments; |
— |
drivers cabs. |
Tanks constructed to the following requirements are deemed to satisfy the minimum impact performance.
If other materials are used, equivalent safety shall be demonstrated.
The thickness of walls of tanks for flammable liquids shall have a minimum of:
Volume |
Steel |
Aluminium |
≤ 2 000 l |
2,0 mm |
3,0 mm |
> 2 000 l |
3,0 mm |
4,0 mm |
The temperature of the flammable liquid in the tank shall remain below its flash point according to EN ISO 2719 under all normal operating conditions.
The design of flammable liquid tanks shall ensure, as far as reasonably practicable, that during filling or draining or in the event of leakage from a tank or its pipe work, flammable liquids cannot:
— |
come into contact with rotating machinery which might result in a spray; |
— |
be drawn into any device in suction e.g. ventilators, coolers etc.; |
— |
come into contact with hot components or electrical devices, which may produce electrical spark; |
— |
penetrate into layers of thermal and acoustic insulation material. |
4.2.7.2.5.2. Specific requirements for fuel tanks
Filling limit indicators shall be provided that indicate 90 % of the nominal fuel tank volume.
The output from the limit indicator device shall be easily understandable from the filler position.
It shall be ensured that flammable liquid cannot escape from filler pipes or other openings under normal banking (cant) conditions.
To avoid confusion the kind of appropriate flammable liquid shall be clearly labelled at the filling pipe of the fuel tank. The labelling of the flammable liquid shall be given textual in accordance to safety data sheets according ISO 11014-1. The following danger signs shall be displayed in the vicinity of the filling pipe:
Danger sign according Directive 92/58/EEC
Or danger sign according Directive 92/58/EEC
4.2.7.3. Protection against electric shock
Electrically live components shall be designed such that conscious and unconscious contact with train staff and passengers is prevented, in normal operation and in case of equipment failure.
All trains shall be equipped with appropriate tools to earth the vehicles. The driver's manual, kept on the train, and the maintenance manual shall describe their use.
Rolling stock shall comply with the requirements of EN 50153: 2002.
Rolling stock shall comply with the provisions of Annex O of this TSI for earthing protection.
4.2.7.4. External lights and horn
4.2.7.4.1. Front and rear lights
4.2.7.4.1.1. Head lights
Two white head lamps shall be provided at the front end of the train, arranged on the horizontal axis at the same height above the rail level, symmetrical about the centre line, and at a minimum of 1 300 mm apart. Where the presence of a tapered nose cone means 1 300 mm is not achievable it is permissible to reduce this dimension to 1 000 mm
Headlamps shall be mounted between 1 500 and 2 000 mm above the rail level.
The headlamps shall be installed on the vehicle such that the vertical illuminance at a distance of greater than or equal to 100 m is less than 0,5 lux at rail level.
Requirements on headlamps as interoperability constituents are defined in clause H.2 of Annex H.
4.2.7.4.1.2. Marker lights
Three white marker lamps shall be provided at the front end of the train. Two marker lamps shall be arranged on the horizontal axis at the same height above the rail level, symmetrical about the centre line, and at a minimum of 1 300 mm apart. Where the presence of a tapered nose cone means 1 300 mm is not achievable it is permissible to reduce this dimension to 1 000 mm. The third marker lamp shall be arranged centrally above the two lower lamps.
The two lower marker lamps shall be mounted between 1 500 and 2 000 mm above the rail level.
Requirements on marker lamps as interoperability constituents are defined in clause H.2 of Annex H.
4.2.7.4.1.3. Tail lights
Two red tail lamps shall be provided at the rear end of the train, arranged on the horizontal axis at the same height above the rail level, symmetrical about the centre line, and at a minimum of 1 300 mm apart. Where the presence of a tapered nose cone means 1 300 mm is not achievable it is permissible to reduce this dimension to 1 000 mm
Tail lamps shall be mounted between 1 500 and 2 000 mm above the rail level.
Requirements on tail lamps as interoperability constituents are defined in clause H.3 of Annex H.
4.2.7.4.1.4. Lamp controls
A driver shall be able to control the head and marker lamps from the normal driving position. The following functions shall be provided:
(i) |
All lamps off |
(ii) |
Dimmed marker lamps on (daytime and night-time use for bad weather conditions) |
(iii) |
Full marker lamps on (daytime and nighttime use in normal weather conditions) |
(iv) |
Dimmed headlamps on (daytime and nighttime by driver's choice;) |
(v) |
Full-beam headlamps on (daytime and nighttime by driver's choice. Dimmed headlamps shall be used when passing trains, intersecting roads, and passing stations.) |
The tail lamps at the rear end of the train shall be automatically switched on when function ii), iii), iv) or v) above is selected. This requirement shall not be applicable for variable formations.
The external lamps located at intermediate points within the train shall be switched off.
In addition to their traditional role as the front and rear lamps, it is permissible in emergency to use the lamps in specific ways and arrangements.
4.2.7.4.2. Horns
4.2.7.4.2.1. General
Trains shall be fitted with horns with two distinct tones. The notes of the audible warning horns are intended to be recognisable as being from a train and not be similar to warning devices used in road transport or as factory or other common warning devices. The acceptable Warning Horn notes shall be either:
(a) |
Two separately sounded warning horns. The fundamental frequencies of the warning horn notes shall be:
or |
(b) |
Two warning horns sounded together as a chord (for the high note). The fundamental frequencies of the chord notes shall be:
or |
(c) |
Two warning horns sounded together as a chord (for the high note). The fundamental frequencies of the chord notes shall be:
or |
(d) |
Three warning horns sounded together as a chord (for the high note). The fundamental frequencies of the chord notes shall be:
|
4.2.7.4.2.2. Warning horn sound pressure levels
The A or C weighted sound pressure level produced by each horn sounded separately (or in a group if designed to sound simultaneously as a chord) shall be between 115dB and 123 dB when measured and verified in accordance with the method defined below. The 115dB sound pressure level shall be achieved when the system air pressure is at 5 bar and the 123dB sound pressure level shall not be exceeded when the system air pressure is at 9 bar.
4.2.7.4.2.3. Protection
Warning horns and their control systems shall be protected, so far as is practicable, from impact and subsequent blockage by airborne objects such as debris, dust, snow, hail or birds.
4.2.7.4.2.4. Verification of sound pressure levels
Sound pressure levels shall be measured 5 metres from the front of the train at the same height as the horn and over a ground covering of new, clean ballast.
Noise measurements of warning horns shall be carried out at an open site which generally meets the requirements of figure 2, where:
D = 5m.
R ≥ 1,3 D = 6,5m.
Figure 2
Open site for warning horn measurements
For pneumatic horns, noise measurements shall be carried out when the air pressure in the main reservoir is at 5 bar and 9 bar.
In order to minimise environmental impact it is advisable that the C weighted sound pressure level when measured 5 metres from the side of the train, at the same height as the horn, in line with the front of the horn is at least 5dB lower than the level measured in front of the train.
4.2.7.4.2.5. Interoperability constituent requirements
The fundamental frequencies of the notes of the horns shall be either:
622 Hz ± 30 Hz
or
470 Hz ± 25 Hz
or
370 Hz ± 20 Hz
or
311 Hz ± 20 Hz
4.2.7.5. Lifting/rescue procedures
The train manufacturer shall provide the relevant technical information to the railway undertaking.
4.2.7.6. Interior noise
The interior noise level of passenger vehicles is not considered to be a Basic Parameter and is not therefore the subject of this TSI.
The noise level within the driver's cab is the subject of Directive 2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 6 February 2003 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise) and shall be applied by railway undertakings and their staff. For the EC verification of rolling stock fulfilment of the requirements of this TSI is sufficient. The limiting values are defined in Table 19.
Table 19
Limiting values LpAeq,T for the noise within the driver's cab of rolling stock
Noise within the driver's cab |
LpAeq,T [dB(A)] |
Measurement time interval [s] |
Standstill (during external acoustical warning in accordance with clause 4.2.7.4. |
95 |
3 |
Maximum speed. (open country without interior and exterior warnings) |
80 |
60 |
The measurements shall be done under the following conditions:
— |
the doors and windows shall be closed, |
— |
the hauled loads shall be equal to at least two-thirds of the maximum permissible value, |
— |
For the measurements at maximum speed, the microphone shall be positioned at the height of the driver's ear (in the seated position), at the centre of a horizontal plane extending from the front windowpanes to the rear wall of the cab. |
— |
For measurements of the horn's impact, 8 evenly spaced microphone positions around the position of the driver's head with a radius of 25 cm (in the seated position) shall be used, in a horizontal plane. The arithmetic mean of the 8 values shall be assessed against the limit. |
— |
The wheels and track shall be in good running order; |
— |
The maximum speed shall be maintained for at least 90 % of the measurement time. |
It is permissible to subdivide the measurement time into several short periods in order to comply with the above-mentioned conditions.
4.2.7.7. Air conditioning
Driving cabs shall be ventilated by a fresh airflow of 30m3/hr per person. It is permitted to interrupt this airflow when running in tunnels providing the carbon dioxide concentration does not exceed 5 000 ppm assuming the initial carbon dioxide concentration lower than 1 000 ppm.
4.2.7.8. Driver's vigilance device
Any lack of driver vigilance shall be detected within 30 to 60 seconds and shall lead, in the absence of driver reaction, to, as a minimum, an automatic full service brake application on the train and a cessation of re-filling of the main brake pipe.
4.2.7.9. Control-command and signalling system
4.2.7.9.1. General
The interface characteristics between the rolling stock and the control-command and signalling subsystem are included in clause 4.2.1.2 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006. Amongst others the following requirements of this High Speed Rolling Stock TSI are relevant:
— |
The minimum braking characteristics for the train specified in clause 4.2.4.1; |
— |
Compatibility between the ground-based train detection systems and the rolling stock, specified in clause 4.2.6.6.1; |
— |
Compatibility between the detectors fixed under vehicles and the dynamic clearances of those vehicles specified in clause 4.2.3.1; |
— |
The environmental conditions for the on-board equipment are specified in clause 4.2.6.1 |
— |
Electromagnetic compatibility with on-board control-command equipment specified in clause 4.2.6.6.3; |
— |
Train characteristics concerning braking (specified in section 4.2.4), and train length (specified in clause 4.2.3.5); |
— |
Electromagnetic compatibility with the ground-based systems specified in clause 4.2.6.6.2. |
In addition, the following functions are directly linked with parameters defined by the control-command and signalling subsystem.
— |
Operation in particular failure/degraded mode conditions as specified in clause 4.2.2 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006 |
— |
Monitoring to ensure that the train speed is at all times less than or at most equal to the maximum permitted speed in the operating environment. |
Information about the characteristics of these interfaces is given in Tables 5.1 A, 5.1 B and 6.1 in the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006. In addition, reference to European standards and specifications to be used as part of the assessment procedure for conformity are indicated, for each characteristic, in Annex A of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
Position of control-command and signalling system on-board antennae is specified in clauses 4.2.2 and 4.2.5 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.2.7.9.2. Wheelset location
The requirements for wheelset location linked to the control-command and signalling subsystem are as follows:
The distance between two consecutive axles of a vehicle shall not exceed the values that are specified in clause 2.1.1 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006, and shall not be less than the value that is specified in clause 2.1.3 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
The longitudinal distance from the first axle or from the last axle to the nearest end of the vehicle (i.e. nearest end of coupler, buffer or vehicle nose) shall comply with the requirements given in clause 2.1.2 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006
The distance between the first and the last axle of a vehicle shall not be less than the value that is specified in clause 2.1.4 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.2.7.9.3. Wheels
The requirements for wheels linked to control-command and signalling subsystem are specified in clause 2.2 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
Requirements for the ferromagnetic qualities of the wheel material are specified in clause 3.4 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.2.7.10. Monitoring and diagnostic concepts
The functions and equipment specified in this TSI and repeated below, shall be monitored by themselves or externally:
— |
Door operation as specified in clause 4.2.2.4.2.1 |
— |
Instability detection, as specified in clause 4.2.3.4.5 |
— |
On-board axle box health monitoring, as specified in clause 4.2.3.3.2.1 |
— |
Activation of the passenger alarm as specified in clause 4.2.5.3 |
— |
Brake system as specified in clause 4.2.4.3 |
— |
Derailment detection as specified in clause 4.2.3.4.11 |
— |
Fire detection as specified in clause 4.2.7.2.3 |
— |
Failure of the driver vigilance device as specified in clause 4.2.7.8 |
— |
Control-command and signalling subsystem information as specified in clause 4.2.7.9 |
This monitoring of the functions and equipment shall be continuous, or at a frequency to ensure reliable detection of failure. For Class 1 trains the system shall also be linked to the on-board diagnosis data recorder to allow traceability. For all classes of trains the recording related requirements for control-command and signalling subsystem as described in the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006 are mandatory.
Indication to the driver shall be made of such detection, and shall require reaction by the driver.
Appropriate automatic braking shall be required where a functional failure occurs on the driver vigilance device or on the control-command and signalling subsystem onboard the trains.
4.2.7.11. Particular specification for tunnels
4.2.7.11.1. Passenger and train crew areas equipped with air conditioning
The train crew shall be able to minimise the distribution and inhalation of fumes in the event of a fire. For this purpose it shall be possible to switch off or close all means of external ventilation and switch off air conditioning. It is permissible to trigger these actions by remote control per train, or at the level of a single vehicle.
4.2.7.11.2. Public address system
Requirements for communication systems are specified in clause 4.2.5.1.
4.2.7.12. Emergency lighting system
To provide protection and safety on board in the event of emergency the trains shall be equipped with an emergency lighting system. This system shall provide a suitable lighting level in the passenger and in the service areas, as follows:
— |
For a minimum Operating time of three hours after the main energy supply has failed, |
— |
Lighting level of at least 5 lux at floor level. |
Values for specific areas and testing methods as defined in Clause 5.3 of EN13272:2001 and shall be complied with.
In the event of fire, the emergency lighting system shall continue to sustain at least 50 % of the emergency lighting in the vehicles not affected by fire for a minimum of 20 minutes. This requirement shall be deemed to be fulfilled by a satisfactory failure mode analysis.
4.2.7.13. Software
Software which has an impact on safety related functions shall be developed and assessed in accordance with the requirements of EN50128: 2001 and EN50155:2001/A1:2002.
4.2.7.14. Driver-Machine-Interface (DMI)
The European Traffic Control System display for driving cabs remains an open point.
4.2.7.15. Vehicle identification
Open point
4.2.8. Traction and electrical equipment
4.2.8.1. Traction performance requirements
In order to guarantee proper compatibility with other train operations, the mean minimum accelerations calculated over time on a level track shall be as set out in Table 20.
Table 20
Calculated minimum mean accelerations
|
Class 1 accelerations m/s2 |
Class 2 accelerations m/s2 |
0 to 40 km/h |
0,40 |
0,30 |
0 to 120 km/h |
0,32 |
0,28 |
0 to 160 km/h |
0,17 |
0,17 |
At the maximum service speed and on level track, the train shall still be capable of an acceleration of at least 0,05 m/s2.
For reasons of availability, traffic flow, and safe clearance of tunnels, trains shall meet all the following conditions:
— |
Performance shall be achieved with the nominal voltage; |
— |
One failed traction module shall not deprive a train of more than 25 % of its rated output on a Class 1 train and not more than 50 % on a Class 2 train; |
— |
On a Class 1 train a single failure of power equipment feeding the traction modules shall not deprive the train of more than 50 % of its traction power. |
A traction module is defined as power electronic equipment feeding one or several traction motors and which is able to operate independently of the others.
Under these conditions it shall be possible for a train under normal load (as defined in clause 4.2.3.2) with one traction module out-of-service to start on the maximum gradient it is likely to encounter with an acceleration of approximately 0,05 m/s2. It shall be possible to move the train in this condition on the same gradient for ten minutes and to reach 60 km/h.
4.2.8.2. Traction wheel/rail adhesion requirements
(a) |
To ensure a high availability of traction, the design of the train and the calculation of its traction performance shall not make use of wheel/rail adhesion exceeding the values given in Table 21. Table 21 Maximum allowed wheel/rail adhesion for traction performance calculation
Linear interpolation shall be made for intermediate speed values. These figures are required only for design and calculation purposes and not for assessment of anti-slip systems. |
(b) |
Traction axles shall be equipped with an anti-slip system. No assessment of this system is required. |
4.2.8.3. Functional and technical specification related to the electric power supply
The electrical characteristics of rolling stock which interface with the energy subsystem shall be considered under the following headings:
— |
The voltage and frequency variations in the power supply, |
— |
The maximum power that can be drawn from theoverhead contact line, |
— |
The power factor of the alternating current supply, |
— |
The short over voltages generated by the operation of rolling stock, |
— |
The electromagnetic interference, see clause 4.2.6.6, |
— |
The other functional interfaces quoted in clause 4.2.8.3.7. |
4.2.8.3.1. Voltage and frequency of the power supply
4.2.8.3.1.1. Power supply
Trains shall be able to operate within the range of voltages and frequencies as given in clause 4.2.2 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006 and specified in clause 4 of EN50163:2004.
4.2.8.3.1.2. Energy recuperation
The general conditions for the return of energy to the overhead contact line from regenerative braking are specified in clause 4.2.4.3 of this TSI and in the clause 12.1.1 of EN50388:2005.
Conformity assessment shall be carried out according to the requirements of EN50388:2005, clause 14.7.1.
4.2.8.3.2. Maximum power and maximum current that is permissible to draw from the overhead contact line
The installed power on a high-speed line determines the permissible power consumption of trains. Therefore, current limitation devices shall be installed on board as required in Section 7 of EN50388:2005. Conformity assessment shall be carried out in accordance EN50388:2005, clause 14.3.
For DC systems, the current at standstill shall be limited to the values specified in clause 4.2.20 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006.
4.2.8.3.3. Power factor
The design data to be used for the power factor is set out in EN50388:2005, Section 6 with the following exception in yards, sidings and depots:
The power factor of the fundamental wave shall be ≥ 0,8 (2) under the following conditions:
— |
the train is hotelling with traction power switched off and all auxiliaries running and |
— |
the active power being drawn is greater than 200 kW. |
Conformity assessment shall be carried out according to the requirements of Section 6 and clause 14.2 of EN50388:2005.
4.2.8.3.4. System energy disturbances
4.2.8.3.4.1. Harmonic characteristics and related over-voltages on the overhead contact line
A traction unit shall not cause unacceptable overvoltages by generating harmonics. A compatibility assessment on the traction unit shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of clause 10 of EN50388:2005, that demonstrates that the traction unit does not generate harmonics beyond the defined limits.
4.2.8.3.4.2. Effects of DC content in AC supply
The AC electric traction units shall be designed so that they are immune for small DC current the value of which is specified in clause 4.2.24 of the High-Speed Energy TSI 2006.
4.2.8.3.5. Energy consumption measuring devices
If energy consumption measuring devices are to be installed on board trains, one device shall be used which shall be able to function in all Member States. The specification of this device remains an open point.
4.2.8.3.6. Rolling stock subsystem requirements linked to pantographs
4.2.8.3.6.1. Pantograph contact force
(a) Requirements for mean contact force
The mean contact force Fm is formed by the static and aerodynamic components of the contact force with dynamic correction. F m represents a target value to be achieved in order to ensure current collection quality without undue arcing and to limit wear and hazards to contact strips.
The mean contact force is a characteristic of the pantograph for given rolling stock, its position in the train consist and a given vertical extension of the pantograph.
Rolling stock and pantographs fitted on rolling stock shall be designed to exert the mean contact force on the contact wire (at speeds above 80km/h) described in the following figures according to their intended use:
AC systems: Figure 4.2.15.1 of the High-Speed Energy TSI:2006 (Line category I, II and III)
DC systems: Figure 4.2.15.2 of the High-Speed Energy TSI:2006.
In the case of trains with multiple pantographs simultaneously in operation, the contact force Fm for any individual pantograph shall be no higher than the value given by the applicable curve in Figure 4.2.15.1 of the High-Speed Energy TSI:2006 (for AC) or Figure 4.2.15.2 (for DC).
(b) Adjustment of pantograph mean contact force and integration into the Rolling Stock Sub-System
Rolling stock shall permit adjustment of the pantograph to enable it to comply with the requirements specified in this clause.
Conformity assessment shall be carried out in accordance with the High Speed Energy TSI 2006 clause 4.2.16.2.4.
The pantograph shall be designed to be capable of operating with a mean contact force value (Fm) of the target curves as defined in clause 4.2.15 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006. To ensure that Rolling Stock and its operating pantograph are suitable for its intended lines of operation, assessment of the mean contact force shall include measurements according to the applicants requirements as follows: For every line category as defined in Table 4.2.9 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006 on which the train is intended to be operated tests shall be undertaken
— |
at the range of nominal contact wire heights and |
— |
up to a maximum speed |
as applied for by the manufacturer, railway undertaking or their authorised representatives established within the Community, which asks for assessment.
For these tests, the speed shall be increased from 150 km/h to the maximum speed with intermediate steps not greater than 50 km/h each for the maximum and minimum height. The minimum number of speed levels for Class 1 Rolling Stock is 5 steps and for Class 2 Rolling Stock 3 steps. No tests are required for intermediate heights of the same category of line.
The Rolling Stock Register shall state the maximum successfully tested operating speed for the Rolling Stock/Pantograph combination for each of the line categories and for the range of heights of the OCL for this line and therefore define the operating range Rolling Stock.
Every Member State shall notify relevant Reference Lines on which assessment can be accomplished. Where available, High Speed Energy TSI 2006 compliant lines shall be selected as Reference Lines.
(c) Pantograph dynamic contact force
The requirements on dynamic contact force are set out in clause 4.2.16 of the High Speed Energy TSI:2006.
4.2.8.3.6.2. Arrangement of pantographs
Trains shall be designed to be able to move from one power supply system or from one phase section to an adjacent one without bridging either system or phase separation sections.
It is permissible for more than one pantograph to be simultaneously in contact with the overhead contact line equipment. Figure 3 illustrates the requirements for arrangement of pantographs.
In accordance with the maximum train length, the maximum spacing between the first and last pantograph (L1) shall be less than 400 m in order to negotiate the specified types of separation sections. Where more than two pantographs are simultaneously in contact with the overhead contact line, the spacing between any pantograph and the third consecutive one marked as (L2) shall be more than 143 m. The spacing between any two consecutive pantographs in contact with the overhead contact line shall be greater than 8m for these specified types of separation sections.
If the spacing between any pantographs does not meet the previous requirement then there shall be an operational rule to lower pantographs to permit trains to negotiate separation sections.
The number of pantographs and their spacing shall be selected taking into consideration the requirements of current collection performance (as defined in clause 4.2.16 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006). The intermediate pantograph may be arranged at any position
When operating on AC power systems, trains with multiple pantographs shall not have electrical links between the pantographs in use.
Where the spacing of consecutive pantographs is less than the spacing shown in table 4.2.19 of the High Speed Energy TSI:2006 rolling stock shall demonstrate by testing that, for the overhead contact line equipment defined in section 4.2 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006, the current collection quality as defined in clause 4.2.16.1 of the Energy TSI 2006 is met for the poorest performing pantograph.
Figure 3
Arrangement of pantographs
4.2.8.3.6.3. Insulation of pantograph from the vehicle
The pantographs shall be assembled on the roof of the vehicles and insulated from earth. The insulation shall be adequate for all system voltages. References for data to be verified are in EN50163:2004, clause 4, for system voltages and EN50124-1:2001, Table A2, for insulation coordination requirements..
4.2.8.3.6.4. Pantograph lowering
Rolling stock shall be equipped with a device that lowers the pantograph in case of a failure meeting the requirements of EN50206-1:1998, clause 4.9.
Rolling stock shall lower the pantograph in a period meeting the requirements of EN50206-1:1998, clause 4.8 and to the dynamic insulating distance according to EN 50119:2001 table 9 either by initiation by the driver or in response to control-command signals. The pantograph shall lower to the housed position in less than 10 seconds.
Conformity assessment shall be made in accordance with the requirements of EN50206-1: 1998, clauses 6.3.2 and 6.3.3.
4.2.8.3.6.5. Quality of current collection
In normal operation the quality of current collection shall meet the requirements of clause 4.2.16 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006. The conformity assessment shall be made with a reference catenary. Definition of a reference catenary remains an open point in the High Speed Energy TSI.
NQ, the percentage of arcing duration, is defined in clause 4.2.16 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006
If, in the event of a failure of the normal operating pantograph, continued operation at normal speed using a backup pantograph is required, the value of NQ shall not exceed 0,5. If operation at normal speed is not required, the train shall operate at such a speed that maintains the normal value of NQ.
4.2.8.3.6.6. Electrical protection coordination
Electrical protection coordination design shall comply with the requirements detailed in clause 11 of EN50388:2005.
Conformity assessment shall be carried out according to the requirements of clause 14.6 of EN50388:2005.
4.2.8.3.6.7. Running through phase separation sections
Trains intended to operate on lines that are fitted with control-command and signalling devices that communicate the requirements of separation sections on a line to trains shall be fitted with systems able to receive this information from these devices.
For Class 1 trains operating on such the subsequent actions shall be triggered automatically.
For Class 2 trains operating on such lines, the action is not required to be automatic, but the traction-unit shall monitor for the intervention of the driver, and if necessary act.
As a minimum, these devices shall enable power consumption (both traction and auxiliaries, and for the no load current of the transformer) to be automatically brought to zero and the main circuit breaker opened before the traction unit enters a separation section, without the intervention of the driver. On leaving the separation section, the devices shall cause the main circuit breaker to be closed and power consumption to be resumed.
Additionally, where phase separation sections require pantographs on a train to be lowered and subsequently raised, these additional actions are permitted to be automatically initiated. These functions shall respond to input signals from the control-command and signalling subsystem.
4.2.8.3.6.8. Running through system separation sections
The available options for running through system separation sections are described in clauses 4.2.22.2 and 4.2.22.3 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006.
Before running through system separation sections the traction unit’s main circuit breaker shall be opened.
When pantographs are not lowered from the contact wire, only those electric circuits on the traction units, which instantaneously conform to the power supply system at the pantograph, may remain connected.
After running through a system separation section, a traction unit shall detect the new system voltage at the pantograph. The modification of the configuration of traction equipment shall be made either automatically or manually.
4.2.8.3.6.9. Height of pantographs
The installation of a pantograph on a traction unit shall allow interaction with contact wires at heights between 4 800 mm and 6 500 mm above rail level.
4.2.8.3.7. Interoperability constituent pantograph
4.2.8.3.7.1. Overall design
Pantographs are devices for collecting currents from one or more contact wires, and for transmitting the current to the traction unit on which they are mounted. They are designed to allow vertical movement of the pantograph head. The pantograph head carries the contact strips and their mountings. The ends of the pantograph head are formed by down-turned horns.
The pantograph shall meet the specified performance as far as maximum running speed and current carrying capacity are concerned. Pantograph requirements are specified in clause 4 of EN50206-1:1998.
Requirements on dynamic behaviour and quality of current collection shall be assessed in accordance with the High Speed Energy TSI 2006 clause 4.2.16.2.2.
4.2.8.3.7.2. Pantograph head geometry
Pantograph heads with the same principal dimensions shall be used on all categories of lines for AC and DC systems. The length and the conducting range of the pantograph head and the profile are defined to achieve interoperability. The profile of the pantograph head shall be as depicted in Figure 4.
Figure 4
Profile of pantograph head
1. |
Horn made of insulating material (projected length 200mm) |
2. |
Minimum length of the contact strip 800 mm |
3. |
Conducting range of collector head 1 200 mm |
4. |
Pantograph head length 1 600 mm |
Pantograph heads fitted with contact strips having independent suspensions shall remain compliant to the overall profile with a static contact force of 70N applied to the middle of the head. The permissible value for pantograph head skew is defined in EN 50367:2006 clause 5.2.
Contact between contact wire and pantograph head is possible outside the contact strips and within the whole conducting range over limited line sections under adverse conditions, e.g. coincidence of vehicle swaying and high winds.
4.2.8.3.7.3. Pantograph static contact force
The static contact force is the vertical contact force exerted upward by the pantograph head on the contact wire and caused by the pantograph-raising device, whilst the pantograph is raised and the vehicle is at standstill.
The static contact force exerted by the pantograph on the contact wire, as defined in EN50206-1:1998 clause 3.3.5, shall be adjustable within the following ranges:
— |
40N to 120N for AC supply systems, |
— |
50 N to 150N for DC supply systems, |
The pantographs and their mechanisms that provide the necessary contact forces shall ensure that a pantograph is capable of being used on overhead line equipment compliant to the High Speed Energy TSI 2006. For details and assessment, reference shall be made to EN 50206-1:1998, clause 6.3.1
4.2.8.3.7.4. Working range of pantographs
Pantographs shall have a working range of at least 1 700 mm. Conformity assessment shall be made in accordance with the requirements of clauses 4.2 and 6.2.3 of EN 50206-1: 1998.
4.2.8.3.7.5. Current capacity
Pantographs shall be designed for the rated current to be transmitted to the vehicles. The manufacturer shall state the rated current. An analysis shall demonstrate that the pantograph is able to carry the rated current. Conformity assessment shall be made in accordance with the requirements of clause6.13of EN50206-1: 1998.
4.2.8.3.8. Interoperability constituent contact strip
4.2.8.3.8.1. General
Contact strips are the replaceable parts of the pantograph head, which are in direct contact with the contact wire and as a consequence, are prone to wear. Conformity assessment shall be carried out in accordance with the requirements of clauses 5.2.2 to 5.2.4, 5.2.6 and 5.2.7 of EN50405:2006.
4.2.8.3.8.2. Contact strip geometry
The length of the contact strips is defined in Figure 4.
4.2.8.3.8.3. Material
The material used for the contact strips shall be mechanically and electrically compatible with the contact wire material (as specified in 4.2.11 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006), in order to avoid excessive abrasion of the surface of the contact wires, thereby minimising wear of both contact wires and contact strips. Plain carbon or carbon impregnated with additive material shall be used in interaction with contact wires made from copper or copper alloys. Contact strip material shall comply with clause 6.2 of EN 50367: 2006.
4.2.8.3.8.4. Detection of contact strip breakage
Contact strips shall be designed so that any damage that is sustained which is likely to damage the contact wire initiates the automatic lowering device.
Conformity assessment shall be carried out in accordance with the requirements of EN50405:2006 clause 5.2.5.
4.2.8.3.8.5. Current capacity
The material and cross-section of contact strips shall be selected according to the maximum current requirement. The rated current shall be stated by the manufacturer. Type tests shall demonstrate the conformity as specified in clause 5.2 of EN50405:2006.
Contact strips shall be capable of transmitting the current drawn by traction units at standstill. Conformity assessment shall be carried out in accordance with EN50405:2006 clause 5.2.1.
4.2.8.3.9. Interfaces with electrification system
For electrically powered trains, the principal interface elements between the rolling stock and the energy subsystems are defined in the High-Speed Energy and Rolling Stock TSIs.
They are as follows:
— |
The maximum power that can be drawn from the overhead contact line [see clause 4.2.8.3.2 of this TSI and clause 4.2.3 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006] |
— |
The maximum current that can be drawn at standstill [see clause 4.2.8.3.2 of this TSI and clause 4.2.20 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006] |
— |
The voltage and the frequency of the power supply [see clause 4.2.8.3.1.1 of this TSI and clause 4.2.2 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006] |
— |
Over-voltages generated on the overhead line by harmonics [see clause 4.2.8.3.4 of this TSI and clause 4.2.25 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006] |
— |
Electrical protection measures [see clause 4.2.8.3.6.6 of this TSI and clause 4.2.23 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006] |
— |
The arrangement of the pantographs [see clause 4.2.8.3.6.2 of this TSI and clauses 4.2.19, 4.2.21 and 4.2.22 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006] |
— |
Running through phase separation sections [see clause 4.2.8.3.6.7 of this TSI and clause 4.2.21 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006] |
— |
Running through system separation sections [see clause 4.2.8.3.6.8 of this TSI and clause 4.2.22 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006] |
— |
Pantograph contact force [see clause 4.2.8.3.6.1 of this TSI and clause 4.2.14, and 4.2.15 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006] |
— |
Power factor [see clause 4.2.8.3.3 of this TSI and clause 4.2.3 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006] |
— |
Regenerative braking [see clause 4.2.8.3.1.2] defined in clause 4.2.4 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006. |
— |
Pantograph head geometry [see clause 4.2.8.3.7.2 of this TSI and clause 4.2.13 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006] |
— |
Dynamic behaviour of pantographs and quality of current collection [see clause 4.2.8.3.6.5 of this TSI and clause 4.2.16 of the High Speed Energy TSI 2006 |
4.2.8.3.10. Interfaces with control-command and signalling subsystem
The minimum impedance between pantograph and wheels of the rolling stock is specified in clause 3.6.1 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.2.9. Servicing
4.2.9.1. General
Servicing and minor repairs necessary to ensure a safe return journey shall be able to be carried out on parts of the network distant from the vehicles’ home base, including whilst stabled on a foreign network.
Trains shall be capable of being stabled, with no crew onboard, with power supply from the catenary or auxiliary power supply maintained for lighting, air conditioning, refrigerated cabinets, etc.
4.2.9.2. Train external cleaning facilities
It shall be possible for the front windows of drivers’ cabs to be cleaned both from the ground and from platform heights of 550mm and 760mm using suitable (with particular regard to health and safety aspects) cleaning equipment, in all stations and facilities at which the trains call or are stabled.
It shall be possible for the speed at which the train passes through the train washing plant to be adapted to suit each washing plant, i.e. between 2 and 6 km/h.
4.2.9.3. Toilet discharge system
4.2.9.3.1. On board discharge system
The design of the toilet discharge system shall allow sealed toilets (using clear or recycled water) to be emptied at sufficient intervals, so that the emptying operations can be performed on a scheduled basis at designated depots.
The following connections on the rolling stock are interoperability constituents.
— |
The 3″ Evacuation nozzle (Inner part) is defined in Annex M VI Figure M VI.1. |
— |
The flushing connection for the toilet tank (Inner part), the use of which is optional, is defined in Annex M VI Figure M VI.2. |
4.2.9.3.2. Mobile discharge trolleys
Mobile discharge trolleys are interoperability constituents.
Mobile toilet discharge installations shall be compatible with the characteristics of at least one on board discharge system (using clean or recycled water).
Mobile discharge trolleys shall perform all of the following functions:
— |
Discharge, |
— |
Suction (the limit value for the suction vacuum is set at 0,2 bar), |
— |
Rinsing (only applies to retention toilet discharge equipment), |
— |
Pre-loading or filling with additive (only applies to retention toilet discharge equipment), |
The connections on the discharge trolleys (3″ for emptying and 1″ for rinsing) and their seals shall comply with figures M IV.1 and M IV.2 respectively of Annex M IV.
4.2.9.4. Train interior cleaning
4.2.9.4.1. General
A 3 000 VA at 230V, 50Hz electrical power supply connection shall be provided in each coach for powering industrial cleaning equipment. This power shall be available simultaneously in all the coaches of a trainset. Electric power sockets inside the train shall be spaced such that no part of the coach that needs to be cleaned is more than 12 metres from one of the sockets.
4.2.9.4.2. Electrical sockets
The interior electrical sockets shall be compatible with plugs that are compliant to CEE 7 Standard Sheet VII (16 A-250 V, compare Figure 5).
Figure 5
Plug according to CEE 7 Standard Sheet VII (not all dimensions shown)
|
|
Dimensions and tolerances are given for information only. The dimensions and tolerances shall be according to the referred standard.
4.2.9.5. Water restocking equipment
4.2.9.5.1. General
New equipment for water supply on the interoperable network shall be supplied with drinking water in accordance with Directive 98/83/EC, and its mode of operation shall ensure that water delivered at the last element of the fixed part of these installations complies with the quality specified by this same Directive for water intended for human consumption.
4.2.9.5.2. Water filling adapter
The water filling adapters are interoperability constituents, which are defined in Annex M V.
4.2.9.6. Sand restocking equipment
Sandboxes are normally filled during scheduled maintenance operations in specialised workshops in charge of trainset maintenance. However, if required, sand meeting local specifications for this use shall be made available to fill sand boxes so that rolling stock can continue in commercial service until it returns to its maintenance centre.
4.2.9.7. Special requirements for stabling of trains
Rolling stock shall be designed so that:
— |
Periodic monitoring is not necessary when stabled and connected electrically to an electrical supply system, |
— |
It can be configured for different functional levels (e.g. standby, preparation, etc.), |
— |
An absence of voltage does not damage any rolling stock constituent, |
4.2.9.8. Refuelling equipment
Open point
4.2.10. Maintenance
4.2.10.1. Responsibilities
All maintenance activities undertaken on rolling stock shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of this TSI.
All maintenance shall be undertaken in accordance with the maintenance file applicable to the rolling stock.
The maintenance file shall be managed in accordance with the provisions specified in this TSI.
After delivery of the rolling stock by the supplier, and acceptance thereof, a single entity shall assume responsibility for the management of changes affecting the design integrity, for the maintenance of the rolling stock and for the management of the maintenance file.
The rolling stock register shall state the entity responsible for the maintenance of the rolling stock and the management of the maintenance file.
4.2.10.2. The maintenance file
The maintenance file shall be composed of
— |
the maintenance design justification file and |
— |
the maintenance documentation. |
4.2.10.2.1. The maintenance design justification file
The maintenance design justification file
— |
describes the methods used to design the maintenance |
— |
describes the tests, investigations, calculations carried out to design the maintenance |
— |
gives the relevant data used for this purpose and justifies its origin |
— |
describes the resources needed for the maintenance of rolling stock. |
This file shall contain:
— |
Name and department of the manufacturer and/or the railway undertaking responsible for the maintenance file. |
— |
Precedents, principles and methods used to design the maintenance of the vehicle. |
— |
Utilisation profile (Limits of the normal utilisation of the vehicle (e.g. km/month, climatic limits, authorised types of loads etc.) taken into account for the design of the maintenance). |
— |
Tests, investigations, calculations carried out. |
— |
Relevant data used to design the maintenance and origin of these data (return of experience, tests …). |
— |
Responsibility and traceability of the design process (name, skills and position of the author and approver of each document). |
— |
Resources needed for the maintenance (e.g. required time for inspections, replacement of parts, life time of components etc.) |
4.2.10.2.2. The Maintenance Documentation
The maintenance documentation consists of all the documents necessary to carry out the management and execution of the maintenance of the vehicle. It shall be composed of the following:
— |
Component hierarchy and functional description: The hierarchy sets up the boundaries of the rolling stock by listing all the items belonging to the product structure of that rolling stock and using an appropriate number of discrete levels. The last item shall be a replaceable unit. |
— |
Schematic circuit diagrams, connection diagrams and wiring diagrams |
— |
Parts List: Containing the technical descriptions of the spare parts (replaceable units) in order to allow identification and procurement of the correct spares. |
— |
Safety/interoperability-relevant limits: For the safety/interoperability relevant components or parts according to this TSI, this document shall give the measurable limits not to be exceeded in service (to include operation in degraded mode). Safety critical data (see Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC Article 14(5)e) relating to the maintenance schedule of the vehicle shall be included in the rolling stock register. |
— |
European legal obligations: Where components or systems are subject to specific European legal obligations these obligations shall be listed. |
— |
Maintenance plan
The level of the maintenance operations shall be described. Note: Some maintenance operations like overhauls and very heavy repairs may not be able to be defined at the moment when the vehicle is put into service. In this case, the responsibility and the procedures to define such maintenance operations shall be described. |
— |
Maintenance manuals and leaflets For each maintenance operation listed in the maintenance plan, the manual explains the list of the tasks to be carried out. Where maintenance tasks are common to different operations or common to different vehicles it is permissible to explain them in specific maintenance leaflets. The manuals and leaflets shall contain the following information:
|
— |
Traceability and records. |
— |
Troubleshooting (fault diagnosis) manual including functional and schematic diagrams of the systems |
4.2.10.3. Management of the maintenance file.
The maintenance file shall be supplied with the first train or vehicle of a series, either by the manufacturer or/and the railway undertaking and submitted to the processes as specified in clause 6.2.4 of this TSI, before putting into service. This section does not apply to prototypes when they are being used for evaluation purposes.
After putting the first train or vehicle of a series into service the railway undertaking is responsible for the management of the maintenance file appertaining to rolling stock for which it has management responsibility relative to the provisions specified within this TSI. This includes a process of regular review of the maintenance file to ensure compliance with the essential requirements.
The maintenance file shall be managed in accordance with the processes defined in the certified safety management system of the railway undertaking.
In the case where railway undertakings carry out maintenance on the rolling stock they use, the railway undertaking shall ensure processes are in place to manage the maintenance and operational integrity of the rolling stock, including:
— |
Information in the rolling stock register, |
— |
Asset Management, including records of all maintenance undertaken and due on the rolling stock (which shall be subject to specified retention periods for differing levels of archive storage). |
— |
Software where relevant. |
— |
Procedures for the receipt and processing of specific information related to the operational integrity of rolling stock, arising as a result from any circumstance including but not limited to operational or maintenance incidents, that have a potential to affect the safety integrity of rolling stock. |
— |
Procedures for the identification, generation and dissemination of specific information related to the operational integrity of rolling stock, arising as a result from any circumstance including but not limited to operational or maintenance incidents, with a potential to affect the safety integrity of rolling stock, and which is identified during any maintenance activity. |
— |
Operational duty profiles of rolling stock. (Including but not limited to total kilometres travelled). |
— |
Processes for the protection and validation of such systems. |
In accordance with the provisions of Directive 2004/49 Annex III, the safety management system of the railway undertaking shall demonstrate that suitable maintenance arrangements are in place, thereby ensuring on-going compliance with the essential requirements and the requirements of this TSI including the requirements of the maintenance file.
In the case of entities other than the railway undertaking using rolling stock, being responsible for the maintenance of this rolling stock, the railway undertaking using the rolling stock shall ascertain that all relevant maintenance processes are in place and are actually applied. This process shall also be suitably described within the safety management system of the railway undertaking.
The entity responsible for the maintenance of the rolling stock shall ensure that reliable information about maintenance processes and data specified to be made available in the TSIs are available for the operating railway undertaking, and shall demonstrate on request of the operating railway undertaking that these processes ensure the compliance of the rolling stock with the Essential Requirements of Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC.
4.2.10.4. Management of maintenance information.
The entity responsible for the maintenance of rolling stock shall ensure that it has processes for the management of, and secured access rights to, information relative to the management, maintenance and operational integrity of rolling stock. Other parties operationally involved in this process shall provide the required maintenance information. This information shall include:
— |
rolling stock register. |
— |
Configuration management information |
— |
Maintenance management information systems including records of all maintenance undertaken and maintenance, due on rolling stock, for which it is responsible (which shall be subject to specified time periods for differing levels of archive storage). |
— |
Management procedures for the receipt and processing of specific information relative to the operational integrity of rolling stock including operational and/or maintenance incidents with a potential to affect the safety integrity of rolling stock. |
— |
Management procedures for the identification, generation and dissemination of specific information relative to the operational integrity of rolling stock, including operational and/or maintenance incidents, with a potential to affect the safety integrity of rolling stock, and which is identified during any maintenance activity including repair of parts. |
— |
Operational duty profiles of rolling stock (e.g. kilometres). |
— |
Security management processes for protection and validation of the information systems. |
4.2.10.5. Implementation of the maintenance
The railway undertaking shall schedule rosters so that each train returns at staggered intervals to designated bases where the major maintenance operations will be carried out at frequencies compatible with the design and reliability of high-speed trains.
When a train is in a degraded state, the conditions under which some repair work can be undertaken to allow its safe return to a designated base and the special operating conditions shall be agreed, case by case, between the infrastructure managers and the railway undertaking or by a document as required by clause 4.2.1
4.3. Functional and technical specification of the interfaces
4.3.1. General
As far as technical compatibility is concerned, these are the interfaces of the rolling stock subsystem with the other subsystems:
— |
The design of the trains |
— |
Driver vigilance device |
— |
The electrification system |
— |
On-board train control equipment |
— |
Platform height |
— |
The door controls |
— |
Emergency exits |
— |
Headlights |
— |
Emergency couplers |
— |
Wheel/rail contact |
— |
Axle bearing health monitoring |
— |
Passenger alarm |
— |
Pressure wave effects |
— |
Effect of cross-winds |
— |
Brakes independent of wheel/rail adhesion |
— |
Flange lubrication |
— |
Coefficient of flexibility |
The interfaces are defined in the following sections in order to assure the coherence of a consistent High Speed Trans-European network.
In the light of the essential requirements in Section 3, the functional and technical specifications of the interfaces are arranged by subsystem in the following order:
— |
Infrastructure subsystem |
— |
Energy subsystem. |
— |
Control-command and signalling subsystem |
— |
Operation subsystem |
For each of these interfaces, the specifications are arranged in the same order as in section 4.2, as follows:
— |
Structures and mechanical parts |
— |
Track interaction and gauging |
— |
Braking |
— |
Passenger information and communication |
— |
Environmental conditions |
— |
System protection |
— |
Traction and electrical equipment |
— |
Servicing |
— |
Maintenance |
The following list is endorsed to indicate which subsystems are identified as having interface with basic parameters of this TSI:
— |
Structures and mechanical parts (clause 4.2.2): Design of trains (clause 4.2.1.2): Operation subsystem End couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains (clause 4.2.2.2): Operation subsystem Strength of vehicle structure (clause 4.2.2.3): No interfaces identified. Access (clause 4.2.2.4): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem Toilets (clause 4.2.2.5): Operation subsystem Driver's cab (clause 4.2.2.6): Infrastructure subsystem and control-command and signalling subsystem. Windscreen and front of the train (clause 4.2.2.7): Control-command and signalling subsystem. |
— |
Vehicle track interaction and gauging (clause 4.2.3): Kinematic gauge (clause 4.2.3.1): Infrastructure subsystem Static axle load (clause 4.2.3.2): Infrastructure subsystem and control-command and signalling subsystem Rolling stock parameters, which influence ground based train monitoring systems (clause 4.2.3.3): Infrastructure subsystem and control-command and signalling subsystem and operation subsystem Rolling stock dynamic behaviour (clause 4.2.3.4): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem Maximum train length (clause 4.2.3.5): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem Maximum Gradients (clause 4.2.3.6): Infrastructure subsystem Minimum curve radius (clause 4.2.3.7): Infrastructure subsystem Flange lubrication (clause 4.2.3.8): Infrastructure subsystem Suspension coefficient (clause 4.2.3.9): Energy subsystem Sanding (clause 4.2.3.10): Control-command and signalling subsystem and operation subsystem Aerodynamic effects on ballast (clause 4.2.3.11): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem |
— |
Braking(clause 4.2.4): Braking performance (clause 4.2.4.1): Control-command and signalling subsystem and operation subsystem Brake wheel/rail adhesion demand limits (clause 4.2.4.2): No interfaces identified Brake system requirements (clause 4.2.4.3): Energy subsystem and operation subsystem Service Braking Performance (clause 4.2.4.4): No interfaces identified Eddy current brakes (clause 4.2.4.5): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem Protection of an immobilised train (clause 4.2.4.6): Operation subsystem Brake performance on steep gradients (clause 4.2.4.7): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem |
— |
Passenger information and communication (clause 4.2.5): Public address system (clause 4.2.5.1): Operation subsystem Passenger information signs (clause 4.2.5.2): No interfaces identified Passenger alarm (clause 4.2.5.3): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem |
— |
Environmental conditions (clause 4.2.6) Environmental conditions (clause 4.2.6.1): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem Train aerodynamic loads in open air (clause 4.2.6.2): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem Crosswind (clause 4.2.6.3): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem Maximum Pressure Variations in Tunnels (clause 4.2.6.4): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem Exterior Noise (clause 4.2.6.5): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem Exterior Electromagnetic Interference (clause 4.2.6.6): Energy subsystem and control-command and signalling subsystem |
— |
System protection (clause 4.2.7): Emergency Exits (clause 4.2.7.1): Operation subsystem Fire safety (clause 4.2.7.2): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem Protection against electric shock (clause 4.2.7.3): No interfaces identified External lights (clause 4.2.7.4): Infrastructure subsystem and energy subsystem and control-command and signalling subsystem and operation subsystem Horn (clause 4.2.7.4): Operation subsystem Lifting/rescue procedures (clause 4.2.7.5): Operation subsystem Interior Noise (clause 4.2.7.6): Operation subsystem Air Conditioning (clause 4.2.7.7): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem Driver's Vigilance Device (clause 4.2.7.8): Operation subsystem Control-command and Signalling system (clause 4.2.7.9): Control-command and signalling subsystem Monitoring and Diagnostic Concepts (clause 4.2.7.10): Control-command and signalling subsystem and operation subsystem Particular specification for tunnels (clause 4.2.7.11): Infrastructure subsystem and control-command and signalling subsystem and operation subsystem Emergency lighting system (clause 4.2.7.12): No interfaces identified Software (clause 4.2.7.13): No interfaces identified |
— |
Traction and electrical equipment (clause 4.2.8): Traction performance requirements (clause 4.2.8.1): Operation subsystem Traction wheel/rail adhesion requirements (clause 4.2.8.2): Operation subsystem Functional and technical specification related to power supply (clause 4.2.8.3): Energy subsystem and control-command and signalling subsystem and operation subsystem |
— |
Servicing (clause 4.2.9): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem |
— |
Maintenance (clause 4.2.10): Infrastructure subsystem and operation subsystem |
4.3.2. Infrastructure subsystem
4.3.2.1. Access
Clause 4.2.2.4.1 of this TSI specifies the position of the steps for access. This position depends on the position of the edge of the platform, which is specified in clauses 4.2.20.4 and 4.2.20.5 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.2. Driver's cab
Clause 4.2.2.6 of this TSI specifies that the cab shall be accessible from both sides of the train from the ground or from the platform. The height of the platform measured from the level of the rail is specified in clause 4.2.20.4 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.3. Kinematic gauge
Clause 4.2.3.1 of this TSI specifies that the rolling stock shall comply with one of the kinematic vehicle gauges that are specified in Annex C of the Conventional Rail Rolling Stock TSI 2005. The corresponding infrastructure gauges are specified in clause 4.2.3 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006, and the infrastructure register states for each line the kinematic gauge that shall be met by the rolling stock operating on this line.
4.3.2.4. Static axle load
Clause 4.2.3.2 of this TSI specifies the maximum static axle loads that are allowed for different types of rolling stock. The corresponding specifications are set out in clause 4.2.13 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.5. Rolling stock parameters, which influence ground based train monitoring systems
Clause 4.2.3.3.2 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to axle bearing health monitoring by trackside hot axle boxes detectors. The minimum infrastructure gauge requirements concerning the infrastructure subsystem are set out in clause 4.2.3 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.6. Rolling stock dynamic behaviour and wheel profiles
Clause 4.2.3.4 of this TSI detail the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to rolling stock dynamic behaviour, and particularly the parameters of the wheel profile. The corresponding specifications concerning the infrastructure subsystem, and particularly the parameters of the rail profile, are set out in clauses 4.2.9, 4.2.10, 4.2.11, 4.2.12 and 5.3.1.1 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.7. Maximum train length
Clause 4.2.3.5 of this TSI specifies the maximum length of the train. The maximum length of the platform is specified in clause 4.2.20.2 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006, and the infrastructure register states for each line the minimum length of platform where high speed trains are intended to call at.
4.3.2.8. Maximum gradients
Clause 4.2.3.6 of this TSI specifies that trains shall be able to start, operate and stop on all the lines for which it is designed to operate. The maximum gradient is specified in clause 4.2.5 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006, and the infrastructure register states for each line the maximum gradient.
4.3.2.9. Minimum curve radius
Clause 4.2.3.7 of this TSI specifies that trains shall be able to negotiate the minimum curve radius on all the lines for which it is designed to operate. The minimum curve radius is specified in clauses 4.2.6, 4.2.8 and 4.2.25 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006, and the infrastructure register states for each line the minimum curve radius on high speed tracks and on stabling tracks.
4.3.2.10. Flange lubrication
There is no interface related to flange lubrication with the Infrastructure TSI.
4.3.2.11. Ballast pick up
Clause 4.2.3.11 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to aerodynamic effects on ballast. The corresponding specifications concerning the infrastructure subsystem are set out in clause 4.2.27 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.12. Eddy current brake
Clause 4.2.4.5 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to the use of eddy current brake. The corresponding specifications concerning the infrastructure subsystem are set out in clause 4.2.13 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006, and the infrastructure register states for each line the conditions for use of eddy current brake.
4.3.2.13. Brake performance on steep gradients
Clause 4.2.4.7 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to the brake performance on steep gradients. The corresponding specifications concerning the infrastructure subsystem are set out in clause 4.2.5 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006, and the infrastructure register states for each line the maximum gradient.
4.3.2.14. Passenger alarm
There is no interface related to passenger alarm with the Infrastructure TSI.
4.3.2.15. Environmental conditions
There is no interface related to environmental conditions with the Infrastructure TSI.
4.3.2.16. Train aerodynamic loads in open air
Clause 4.2.6.2 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to the train aerodynamic loads in open air. The corresponding specifications concerning the infrastructure subsystem are set out in clauses 4.2.4, 4.2.14.7 and 4.4.3 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.17. Crosswind
Clause 4.2.6.3 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to the crosswind. The corresponding specifications concerning the infrastructure subsystem are set out in clause 4.2.17 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.18. Maximum pressure variations in tunnels
Clause 4.2.6.4 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to the maximum pressure variations in tunnels. The corresponding specifications concerning the infrastructure subsystem are set out in clause 4.2.16 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.19. Exterior noise
Clause 4.2.6.5 of this TSI details particular specification related to the exterior noise emitted by the rolling stock. The corresponding specifications concerning the infrastructure subsystem are set out in clause 4.2.19 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.20. Fire safety
Clause 4.2.7.2 of this TSI details particular specifications related to fire safety for trains operating in tunnels and/or on elevated sections with a length exceeding 5km. The specifications concerning the infrastructure subsystem, related to tunnels and/or elevated sections are specified in clause 4.2.21 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006, and the infrastructure register states for each line where tunnels and/or on elevated sections with a length exceeding 5km are located or how they are identified.
4.3.2.21. Head lights
There is an interface between the head lights (clause 4.2.7.4.1.1 of this TSI) in term of illuminance and the characteristics of reflective clothes of staff working on or near the track described in clause 4.7 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.22. Particular specification for tunnels
Clause 4.2.7.11 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to operation in tunnels. The corresponding specifications concerning the infrastructure subsystem are specified in clause 4.2.21 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006, and the infrastructure register states for each line where tunnels are located or how they are identified.
4.3.2.23. Servicing
Clause 4.2.9 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to servicing. The corresponding specifications concerning the infrastructure subsystem are specified in clause 4.2.26 of the Infrastructure TSI 2006.
4.3.2.24. Maintenance
There is no interface related to maintenance with the Infrastructure TSI.
4.3.3. Energy subsystem
4.3.3.1. Reserved
4.3.3.2. Brake system requirements
Clauses 4.2.4.3 and 4.2.8.3.1.2 of this TSI detail the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to regenerative braking requirements. The corresponding specifications concerning the energy subsystem are specified in clause 4.2.4 of the High-Speed Energy TSI 2006, and the infrastructure register states for each line where these specifications apply.
4.3.3.3. Exterior electromagnetic interference
Clause 4.2.6.6 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to exterior electromagnetic interference. The corresponding specifications concerning the energy subsystem are specified in clause 4.2.6 of the Energy TSI 2006.
4.3.3.4. Head lights
There is an interface between the head lights (clause 4.2.7.4.1.1 of this TSI) in term of illuminance and the characteristics of reflective clothes of staff working on or near the track described in clause 4.7 of the Energy TSI 2006.
4.3.3.5. Functional and technical specification related to power supply
Clause 4.2.8.3 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to power supply. The corresponding specifications concerning the energy subsystem are specified in clauses 4.2.2, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.9.1, 4.2.9.2, 4.2.10, 4.2.11, 4.2.14, 4.2.15, 4.2.16, 4.2.17, 4.2.18, 4.2.19, 4.2.20, 4.2.21, 4.2.22, 4.2.23, 4.2.24 and 4.2.25 of the Energy TSI 2006. The specifications concerning the energy subsystem, related to the position of the catenary, are specified in clause 4.2.9 of the Energy TSI 2006.
4.3.4. Control-Command and Signalling Subsystem
4.3.4.1. Driver's cab
Clause 4.2.2.6 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to external visibility of the signals by the driver. The position of the signals is specified in clause 4.2.16 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.3.4.2. Windscreen and front of the train
Clause 4.2.2.7 of this TSI specifies that the windscreen shall not alter the colour of the signals. The colour of the signals is specified in clause 4.2.16 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.3.4.3. Static axle load
Clause 4.2.3.2 of this TSI specifies the minimum static axle loads. The corresponding specifications concerning the control-command and signalling subsystem are set out in the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006 clause 4.2.11 and Annex A Appendix 1 Clause 3.1.
4.3.4.4. Rolling stock parameters, which influence ground based train monitoring systems
Clause 4.2.3.3.2.3 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to parameters, which influence ground based train monitoring systems, and particularly electrical resistance of the wheelsets and axle bearing health monitoring. The corresponding specifications concerning the control-command and signalling subsystem are set out in clauses 4.2.10 and 4.2.11 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006 and in its Annex A Appendix 1 clauses 1 to 4
4.3.4.5. Sanding
Clause 4.2.3.10 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to limitation of use of sanding related to the interface with the control-command and signalling subsystem. The corresponding specifications concerning the control-command and signalling subsystem are set out in clause 4.2.11 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006 and in its Annex A Appendix 1 clause 4.1.
4.3.4.6. Braking performance
Clause 4.2.4.1 of this TSI specifies that an infrastructure manager is permitted to define further requirements because of different Class B control-command and signalling systems on their part of the network. The corresponding specifications concerning the control-command and signalling subsystem are set out in clause 4.2.2 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006, and the infrastructure register states these specifications.
Clause 4.2.4.7 of this TSI specifies the braking capability on steep gradients Clause 6.2.1.2 and Annex C of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006 defines how information concerning limiting gradients is transmitted to the train.
4.3.4.7. Electromagnetic interference
Clause 4.2.6.6 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to electromagnetic interference. The corresponding specifications concerning the control-command and signalling subsystem are set out in clause 4.2.12.2; Annex A index A6 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.3.4.8. Control-command and signalling system
Clause 4.2.7.9 of this TSI details specifications concerning the rolling stock related to control-command and signalling system, and particularly wheelset location and wheels. The corresponding specifications concerning wheelset location and wheels are set out in clauses 4.2.11 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006 and in its Annex A Appendix 1. Position of control-command and signalling system on-board antennae is specified in clauses 4.2.2 and 4.2.5 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
Clause 4.2.7.9.1 of this TSI specifies that operation in particular degraded mode of the control-command and signalling subsystem is specified in clause 4.2.2 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.Clause 4.2.7.14 of this TSI specifies the European Traffic Control System display for driving cabs. The requirements specific to the control-command and signalling subsystem are to be found in clause 4.2.2 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.3.4.9. Monitoring and diagnostic concepts
Clause 4.2.7.10 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to monitoring and diagnostic concepts. The corresponding specifications concerning the control-command and signalling subsystem are set out in clause 4.2.2 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.3.4.10. Particular specification for tunnels
Clause 4.2.7.11 of this TSI specifies that air inlet or outlet flap on air conditioning systems are permitted to be closed when running in tunnels. The corresponding specifications concerning the control-command and signalling subsystem related to transmission from the ground of the signal to close or open these flaps are set out in clauses 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 and Annex A index 7 and 33 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.3.4.11. Functional and technical specification related to power supply
Clauses 4.2.8.3.6.9 and 4.2.8.3.6.10 of this TSI specifies that on board equipment to the requirements transmitted by the control-command and signalling subsystem devices when crossing phase and system separations of the energy subsystem. The corresponding specifications concerning the control-command and signalling subsystem are set out in clauses 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 and Annex A index 7 and 33 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
4.3.4.12. Vehicle front lights
There is an interface between the headlights (clause 4.2.7.4.1.1 of this TSI) in term of illuminance and the characteristics of reflective clothes of staff working on or near the track described in clause 4.7 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
Clause 4.2.16 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006 specifies that the retro reflecting signs shall meet the requirements for operation in accordance with the clause 4.2.7.4.1.1 of the High Speed Rolling Stock TSI.
4.3.5. Operation subsystem
4.3.5.1. Design of the trains
Clause 4.2.1.2 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to the design of the trains. Clause 4.2.2.5 and annexes H, J and L of the Operation TSI 2006 specify the rules for the composition of the trains.
4.3.5.2. End couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains
Clause 4.2.2.2 of this TSI and its Annex K details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to end couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains, and particularly requirements concerning operation in part 2 of Annex K. The corresponding specifications are set out in clauses 4.2.2.5, 4.2.3.6.3 and 4.2.3.7 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.3. Access
Clause 4.2.2.4 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to passenger steps and access doors. The corresponding specifications are set out in clause 4.2.2.4 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.4. Toilets
Clause 4.2.2.5 of this TSI specifies the requirements for the toilet flushing system. There is no specification concerning the rules for elaboration of the roster and servicing of the toilets in the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.5. Windscreen and front of the train
Clause 4.2.2.7 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to the windscreen. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for visibility are set out in clause 4.3.2.4 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.6. Rolling stock parameters, which influence ground based train monitoring systems
Clause 4.2.3.3.2 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to axle bearing health monitoring. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for operation in case of detection of a failure are set out in clause 4.2.3.6 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.7. Rolling stock dynamic behaviour
Clause 4.2.3.4 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to rolling stock dynamic behaviour. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for operation in case of detection of instability are set out in clause 4.2.3.6 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.8. Maximum train length
Clause 4.2.3.5 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to maximum train length. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for operation where the length of the train and the length of the platform do not match are set out in clauses 4.2.2.5, 4.2.3.6.3 and 4.2.3.7 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.9. Sanding
Clause 4.2.3.10 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to sanding. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for manual sanding or inhibition of automatic sanding by the driver are set out in clause C.1 of annex B and annex H to the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.10. Ballast pick up
Clause 4.2.3.11 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to ballast pick up. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for speed reduction, when required, are set out in clause 4.2.1.2.2.3 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.11. Braking performance
Clause 4.2.4.1 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to braking performance. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for use of the brake are set out in clauses 4.2.2.5.1, 4.2.2.6.1 and 4.2.2.6.2 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.12. Brake system requirements
Clause 4.2.4.3 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to brake system requirements. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for use of the brake are set out in clauses 4.2.2.5.1, 4.2.2.6.1 and 4.2.2.6.2 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.13. Eddy current brakes
Clause 4.2.4.5 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to eddy current brakes. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for use of the eddy current brakes are set out in clause 4.2.2.6.2 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.14. Protection of an immobilised train
Clause 4.2.4.6 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to protection of an immobilised train. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for securing the train when the parking brake is not sufficient are set out in clause 4.2.2.6.2 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.15. Brake performance on steep gradients
Clause 4.2.4.7 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to brake performance on steep gradients. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for speed restrictions are set out in clauses 4.2.1.2.2.3 and 4.2.2.6.2 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.16. Public address system
Clause 4.2.5.1 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to public address system. There is no specification concerning the rules for use of the public address system in the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.17. Passenger alarm
Clause 4.2.5.3 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to passenger alarm. The corresponding specifications are set out in clause 4.2.2.4 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.18. Environmental conditions
Clause 4.2.6.1 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to environmental conditions. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for admission of rolling stock not compliant with the actual environmental conditions are set out in clauses 4.2.2.5 and 4.2.3.3.2 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.19. Train aerodynamic loads in open air
Clause 4.2.6.2 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to train aerodynamic loads in open air. There is no specification concerning the safety rules for track workers or passengers on platforms in the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.20. Crosswind
Clause 4.2.6.3 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to crosswind. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for speed restriction when needed are set out in clauses 4.2.1.2.2.3 and 4.2.3.6 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.21. Maximum pressure variations in tunnels
Clause 4.2.6.4 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to maximum pressure variations in tunnels. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for speed restriction when needed are set out in clauses 4.2.1.2.2.3 and 4.2.3.6 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.22. Exterior noise
Clause 4.2.6.5 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to exterior noise, which is dependent of operation conditions. The corresponding specifications are set out in clause 4.2.3.7 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.23. Emergency exits
Clause 4.2.7.1 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to emergency exits. The corresponding specifications are set out in clauses 4.2.3.6 and 4.2.3.7 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.24. Fire safety
Clause 4.2.7.2 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to fire safety. The corresponding specifications concerning the procedures in case of fire on board are set out in clauses 4.2.3.6 and 4.2.3.7 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.25. External lights and horn
Clause 4.2.7.4 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to external lights and horn. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for use of external lights and horn are set out in clauses 4.2.2.1.2, 4.2.2.1.3 and 4.2.2.2 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.26. Lifting/rescue procedures
Clause 4.2.7.5 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to lifting/rescue procedures. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for lifting/rescue procedures are set out in clause 4.2.3.7 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.27. Interior noise
Clause 4.2.7.6 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to interior noise, which is dependent of operation conditions. There is no specification in the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.28. Air conditioning
Clause 4.2.7.7 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to air conditioning. There is no specification concerning the rules for interrupting the fresh airflow in the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.29. Driver's vigilance device
Clause 4.2.7.8 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to driver's vigilance device. The corresponding specifications are set out in clauses 4.3.3.2 and 4.3.3.7 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.30. Monitoring and diagnostic concepts
Clause 4.2.7.10 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to monitoring and diagnostic concepts. Additional requirements are set out in clause 4.2.3.5.2 and annexes H and J of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.31. Particular specification for tunnels
Clause 4.2.7.11 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to particular specification for tunnels. The corresponding specifications concerning the procedures for preventing inhalation of fumes in the event of a fire in close proximity to the train are set out in clauses 4.2.1.2.2.1, 4.2.3.7 and 4.6.3.2.3.3 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.32. Traction performance requirements
Clause 4.2.8.1 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to traction performance requirements. The corresponding specifications concerning the procedures for taking this performance into consideration are set out in clauses 4.2.2.5 and 4.2.3.3.2 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.33. Traction wheel/rail adhesion requirements
Clause 4.2.8.2 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to traction wheel/rail adhesion requirements. The corresponding specifications concerning the procedures in case of degraded wheel/rail adhesion condition are set out in clauses 4.2.3.3.2, 4.2.3.6 and 4.2.1.2.2 and in clause C of annex B of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.34. Functional and technical specification related to power supply
Clause 4.2.8.3 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to power supply. The corresponding specifications concerning the procedures in case of degraded situation of the power supply system, the rules for the use of pantographs and the rules to be applied when running through phase or system separation sections are set out in clauses 4.2.3.6 and 4.2.1.2.2 and in annex H of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.35. Servicing
Clause 4.2.9 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to servicing. There is no specification concerning the procedures for servicing in the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.36. Vehicle identification
Clause 4.2.7.15 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the rolling stock related to vehicle identification. The corresponding specifications concerning the rules for identification of the vehicle are set out in clause 4.2.2.3 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.37. Signal sighting
Clause 4.2.2.6 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the external visibility for the driver. The specifications concerning the corresponding operating rules are set out in clauses 4.3.1.1, 4.3.2.4 and 4.3.3.6 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.38. Emergency exits
Clause 4.2.7.1 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the emergency exits. The corresponding specifications are set out in clause 4.2.2.4 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.3.5.39. Driver-Machine-Interface (DMI)
Clause 4.2.7.14 of this TSI details the specifications concerning the European Traffic Control System display for driving cabs. The specifications concerning the corresponding operating rules are set out in clause 4.3.2.3 and Annex A1 of the Operation TSI 2006.
4.4. Operating rules
In light of the essential requirements in Section 3, the operating rules specific to the high-speed rolling stock concerned by this TSI are those that are listed in clause 4.3.5 above.
The following operating rules do not form any part of the assessment of rolling stock.
The operating conditions for degraded mode form part of the safety management systems of a railway undertaking (see clause 4.2.1a)
In addition, operating rules shall be enforced to ensure that a train stopped in a gradient as specified in clause 4.2.4.6 of this TSI (Protection of an immobilised train) will be immobilised by mechanical means by the staff before the end of the two hour period.
Rosters shall take into account the needs for servicing and scheduled maintenance.
The rules for use of the public address system, the passenger alarm and the emergency exits, as well as for the operation of the access doors and of the air conditioning flaps, shall be elaborated by the railway undertaking.
The safety rules for track workers or passengers on platforms shall be elaborated by the infrastructure manager.
The operation conditions shall be set out by the railway undertaking in order that the noise level within the driver's cab is kept within the limit prescribed by the of Directive 2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 6 February 2003 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise), according to the characteristics of the rolling stock as specified in clause 4.2.7.6 of this TSI.
The specifications concerning the procedures for assistance to persons of reduced mobility are an open point, pending the availability of the Conventional Rail TSI for accessibility to PRM.
The seals for the emergency handle shall be replaced after use.
Procedures for lifting and rescue shall be established by the railway undertaking that describe the method as well as the means of recovering a derailed train or a train that is unable to move normally.
4.5. Maintenance rules
In light of the essential requirements in section 3, the maintenance rules specific to the high-speed rolling stock subsystem concerned by this TSI are described in clauses:
— |
4.2.3.3.1 Electrical resistance of wheelsets |
— |
4.2.3.3.2.1 Axle bearing health monitoring for Class 1 trains |
— |
4.2.3.3.2.2 Axle bearing health monitoring for those Class 2 trains requiring hot axle box detection |
— |
4.2.3.4.8 In service values of equivalent conicity |
— |
4.2.7.3 Protection against electric shock |
and in particular in clauses:
— |
4.2.9 Servicing |
— |
4.2.10 Maintenance. |
The maintenance rules shall be such as to enable the rolling stock to pass the assessment criteria specified in Section 6 throughout its lifetime.
The party responsible for the management of the maintenance file as defined in clause 4.2.10 shall define the tolerances and intervals appropriately to ensure ongoing compliance. It is also responsible for deciding the in-service values when not specified in this TSI.
This means the assessment procedures described in section 6 of this TSI shall be fulfilled for type approval, and are not necessarily appropriate for maintenance. Not all tests may be made at every maintenance event and may be subject to wider tolerances.
The combination of the above assures continuous compliance with the essential requirements through the life of the rolling stock.
4.6. Professional competencies
The professional competencies required for the operation of the high-speed rolling stock will be covered by the High Speed Operation TSI 2006.
The competence requirements for the maintenance of the high-speed rolling stock shall be detailed in the maintenance documentation (see clause 4.2.10.2.2).
4.7. Health and safety conditions
The provisions for health and safety in respect of noise, vibration and air conditioning for staff in service compartments shall be no different from the minimum provision made for passengers.
Apart from requirements specified in clauses 4.2.2.6 (driver's cab), 4.2.2.7 (Windscreen and front of the train), 4.2.7.1.2 (driver's cab emergency exit), 4.2.7.2.3.3 (Fire resistance), 4.2.7.6 (interior noise) and 4.2.7.7 (air conditioning) and in the maintenance plan (see clause 4.2.10), there are no additional requirements related to health and safety for maintenance or operations staff in this TSI.
4.8. Infrastructure and rolling stock registers
4.8.1. Infrastructure register
The requirements for the high-speed rail infrastructure register content with regard to the high-speed rolling stock subsystem are specified in the following clauses:
— |
1.2 Geographical scope |
— |
4.2.3.4.3 Track loading limit values |
— |
4.2.3.6 Maximum gradients |
— |
4.2.3.7 Maximum curve radius |
— |
4.2.4.1 Minimum braking performance |
— |
4.2.4.3 Brake system requirements |
— |
4.2.4.5 Eddy current brakes |
— |
4.2.4.7 Brake performance on steep gradients |
— |
4. 2.6.1 Environmental conditions |
— |
4.2.6.6.1 Interference generated on the signalling system and the telecommunications network |
— |
4.2.7.7 Air conditioning |
— |
4.2.8.3 Characteristics of the electrical supply |
— |
4.3.2.3 Kinematic gauge |
— |
4.3.2.7 Maximum train length |
— |
4.3.2.8 Maximum gradients |
— |
4.3.2.9 Minimum curve radius |
— |
4.3.2.12 Eddy current brake |
— |
4.3.2.13 Brake performance on steep gradients |
— |
4.3.2.14 Passenger alarm |
— |
4.3.2.20 Fire safety |
— |
4.3.2.22 Particular specification for tunnels |
— |
4.3.3.2 Brake system requirements |
— |
4.3.4.6 Braking performance |
The infrastructure manager is responsible for the accuracy of the data provided for inclusion in the infrastructure register.
4.8.2. Rolling stock register
The rolling stock register shall contain the following mandatory data for all high-speed rolling stock, which are in accordance with this TSI as listed in Annex I.
If the Member State of registration changes, the contents of the rolling stock register for that high-speed rolling stock shall be passed from the original State of registration to the new State of registration.
The data contained in the rolling stock register is required by:
— |
The Member State to confirm that the high-speed rolling stock meets the requirements in accordance with this TSI |
— |
The infrastructure manager to confirm that the high-speed rolling stock is compatible with the infrastructure over which it is intended to operate |
— |
The railway undertaking to confirm that the high-speed rolling stock is suitable for its traffic requirements. |
5. INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS
5.1. Definition
According to Article 2(d) of Directive 96/48/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, the interoperability constituents are ‘any elementary component, group of components, subassembly or complete assembly of equipment incorporated or intended to be incorporated into a subsystem, upon which the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system depends either directly or indirectly.
The concept of a constituent covers both tangible objects and intangible objects such as software”.
Interoperability constituents described in section 5.3 are constituents, whose technology, design, material, manufacturing and assessment processes are defined and enable their specification and assessment independently of the related subsystem, according to Annex IV of Directive 96/48/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC.
5.2. Innovative solutions
As stated in section 4 of this TSI, innovative solutions may require new specification and/or new assessment methods. These specifications and assessment methods shall be developed by the process described in clause 6.1.4.
5.3. List of constituents
The interoperability constituents are covered by the relevant provisions of Directive 96/48/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC and are listed below:
Automatic centre buffer couplers
Buffing and draw gear components
Towing couplers for recovery and rescue
Driver's cab windscreens
Wheels
Headlamps
Marker lamps
Tail lamps
Horns
Pantographs
Contact strips
Connections for toilet discharge systems
Mobile discharge trolleys
Water filling adapters
5.4. Constituents performance and specifications
The characteristics to be respected by high-speed rolling stock are given in the relevant clauses of section 4.2 indicated below:
Automatic centre buffer couplers [clause 4.2.2.2.2.1]
Buffing and draw gear components [clause 4.2.2.2.2.2]
Towing couplers for recovery and rescue [clause 4.2.2.2.2.3]
Driver's cab windscreens [clause 4.2.2.7]
Wheels[clause 4.2.3.4.9.2
clause H.2 of Annex H]
Marker lamps [clause H.2 of Annex H]
Tail lamps [clause H.3 of Annex H]
Horns [clause 4.2.7.4.2.5
clause 4.2.8.3.7]
Contact strips [clause 4.2.8.3.8]
Connections for toilet discharge systems [Annex M VI]
Mobile discharge trolleys [clause 4.2.9.3.2]
Water filling adapters [clause 4.2.9.5.2].
6. ASSESSMENT OF CONFORMITY AND/OR SUITABILITY FOR USE
6.1. Interoperability constituents of the rolling stock subsystem
6.1.1. Conformity assessment (general)
An EC declaration of conformity or an EC declaration of Suitability for Use in accordance with Article 13(1) and Annex IV Chapter 3 of Directive 96/48/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC shall be drawn up by the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community before placing an interoperability constituent on the market.
The Conformity Assessment of an Interoperability Constituent shall be done according to the following modules. (The modules are described in Annex F to this TSI):
Modules for interoperability constituents:
Module A |
: |
Internal production control for design, development and production phases |
Module A1 |
: |
Internal design control with product verification for design, development and production phases |
Module B |
: |
Type examination for design and development phases |
Module C |
: |
Conformity to type for production phase |
Module D |
: |
Production quality management system for production phase |
Module F |
: |
Product verification for production phase |
Module H1 |
: |
Full quality management system for design, development and production phases |
Module H2 |
: |
Full quality management system with design examination for design, development and production phases |
Module V |
: |
Type validation by in service experience (Suitability for use) |
If the participation of a notified body is required for the appropriate module,
— |
The approval process and the contents of the assessment shall be defined between the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community and a notified body, according to the requirements defined in this TSI. |
— |
For each interoperability constituent as appropriate the notified body to be chosen by the manufacturer shall have been authorised either
|
There is provision in clause 6.3 for dealing with the transitional arrangements for interoperability constituents to be used without certification.
6.1.2. Conformity assessment procedures (modules)
The conformity assessment shall cover the phases and characteristics as indicated by ‘X’ in Table D1 of Annex D to this TSI. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall chose one of the modules or module combinations indicated in the following Table 22 according to the required constituent.
Table 22
Assessment modules for interoperability constitiuents
Clause |
Constituents to be assessed |
Module A |
Module A1 (*) |
Module B+C |
Module B+D |
Module B+F |
Module H1 (*) |
Module H2 |
4.2.2.2.2.1 |
Automatic centre buffer couplers |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
4.2.2.2.2.2 |
Buffing and draw gear components |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
4.2.2.2.2.3 |
Towing coupler for recovery and rescue |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
4.2.2.7 |
Driver's cab windscreens |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
4.2.3.4.9.2 |
Wheels |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
4.2.7.4.2 |
Horns |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
4.2.8.3.7 |
Pantographs |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
4.2.8.3.9 |
Contact strips |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
4.2.9.3.2 |
Mobile discharge trolleys |
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
4.2.9.5.2 |
Water filling adapters |
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
Annex H clause H.2 |
Head lamps |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
Annex H clause H.2 |
Marker lamps |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
Annex H clause H.3 |
Tail lamps |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
Annex M VI |
Connections for toilet discharge system |
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
6.1.3. Existing solutions
If an existing solution for an interoperability constituent is already assessed for an application under comparable conditions and is on the market, then the following process applies:
The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall demonstrate that the results of tests and verifications for the previous assessment of ICs are in conformity with the requirements of this TSI. In this case these tests and verifications shall remain valid for the new assessment. Modules A1 and H1 are permitted to be applied if they are marked in Table 22.
If it is not possible to demonstrate that the solution has been positively proven in the past, the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall choose the assessment procedures according to the modules or module combinations indicated in Table 22. Modules A1 and H1 are not permitted be applied even if they are marked in Table 22.
6.1.4. Innovative solutions
If an innovative solution is proposed for an interoperability constituent, as defined in section 5.2, the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall state the deviations from the relevant clause of this TSI and submit them to the European Railway Agency (ERA). The ERA shall produce and finalise the appropriate functional and interface specifications for the constituents and develop the assessment methods.
The appropriate functional and interface specifications and the assessment methods so produced shall be incorporated in the TSI by the revision process.
After entry into force of a decision of the Commission, taken in accordance with Article 21(2) of Directive 96/48/EC, as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, the innovative solution is permitted to be used before being incorporated into a TSI.
6.1.5. Assessment of suitability for use
Assessment of Suitability for Use according to the type validation of in service experience procedure (module V) as indicated in Annex F of this TSI is required for the following interoperability constitiuents:
— |
Wheels |
— |
End Couplers |
6.2. Rolling stock subsystem
6.2.1. Conformity assessment (general)
In accordance with Annex VI of the Directive 96/48/EC, the contracting entity, or its authorised representative established within the Community shall lodge an application for assessment of conformity of the high-speed rolling stock subsystem and energy subsystem, where relevant, with a notified body of its choice.
This notified body shall have been authorised to assess the high-speed rolling stock subsystem and if required to assess the high-speed energy subsystem. Where it is not authorised to assess the high-speed energy subsystem it shall, if required, contract arrangements with another notified body notified for assessment of the energy subsystem for the assessment of the relevant requirements concerning the on-board part of the energy subsystem (see sections 4.2.8.3, 4.3.3.4 of this TSI.
The EC declaration(s) of verification in accordance with Article 18(1) and Annex VI of Directive 96/48/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, one for the high-speed rolling stock subsystem, one for the on-board part of the energy subsystem if required, shall be drawn up by the applicant.
The EC declaration(s) of verification is/are required to obtain the authorisation to place rolling stock into service.
The Conformity Assessment of a Subsystem shall be performed according to one or a combination of the following modules according to clause 6.2.2 and annex E of this TSI (The modules are described in Annex F of this TSI):
Modules for the EC verification of subsystems
Module SB |
: |
Type examination for design and development phases |
Module SD |
: |
Product quality management system for production phase |
Module SF |
: |
Product verification for production phase |
Module SH2 |
: |
Full quality management system with design examination for design, development and production phases |
The approval process and the contents of the assessment shall be defined between the applicant and a notified body according to the requirements defined in this TSI and in conformance with the rules set out in section 7 of this TSI.
6.2.2. Conformity assessment procedures (modules)
The applicant shall choose one of the modules or module combinations indicated in Table 23.
Table 23
Assessment modules for Subsystems
Subsystem to be assessed |
Module SB+SD |
Module SB+SF |
Module SH2 |
Rolling stock subsystem |
X |
X |
X |
On-board part of the energy subsystem, where relevant |
X |
X |
X |
The characteristics of the rolling stock subsystem to be assessed during the relevant phases are indicated in Annex E, Table E1 of this TSI. The applicant shall confirm that each subsystem produced complies with the type. An ‘X’ in column 4 of table E1 in Annex E indicates that the relevant characteristics shall be verified by testing each single subsystem. The test body shall be determined according to the assessment module in use.
Characteristics of interoperability constitiuents that are indicated in Annex D, Table D1, also appear in Annex E, Table E1. Assessment of these characteristics is covered by the presence of the EC declaration of conformity and if applicable the EC declaration of suitability for use of the interoperability constituent. The assessment of the maintenance subsystem is described in clause 6.2.4.
6.2.3. Innovative solutions
If rolling stock includes an innovative solution as defined in section 4.1, the manufacturer or the contracting entity shall state the deviation from the relevant clause of the TSI and submit them to the European Railway Agency (ERA). The ERA shall finalise the appropriate functional and interface specifications of this solution and develop the assessment methods.
The appropriate functional and interface specifications and assessment methods shall be incorporated in the TSI by the revision process.
After entry into force of a decision of the Commission, taken in accordance with Article 21(2) of Directive 96/48/EC, as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, the innovative solution is permitted to be used before being incorporated into a TSI.
6.2.4. Assessment of maintenance
According to Article 18 (3) of the Directive 96/48/EC, modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, a notified body shall be presented with the maintenance file, which forms part of the technical file.
A notified body shall verify only that the information is contained in the maintenance file according to clause 4.2.10.2. The notified body is not required to verify the information contained.
The conformity assessment of maintenance is the responsibility of each Member State concerned.
Clause F.4 of Annex F (which is an open point) describes the procedure by which each Member State ascertains that maintenance arrangements meet the provisions of this TSI and ensure the basic parameters and essential requirements are met during the life of the rolling stock
6.2.5. Assessment of single vehicles
Where an assessment of a new, upgraded or renewed single vehicle is required according to the requirements of clause 4.2.1.2, and a valid type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification for the other vehicles in the consist is available, a TSI assessment only for the new vehicle is required providing the trainset remains compliant to the TSI.
Where an assessment of a single vehicle is required according to the requirements of clause 4.2.1.2 and a valid type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification for the other vehicles in the consist is not available, it is permitted to accept national certification for such other vehicles until type or design examination certification of ‘EC’ verification is available.
6.3. Interoperable Constituents Not Holding an EC Declaration
6.3.1. General
For a limited period of time, known as the ‘transition period’, interoperability constituents not holding an EC Declaration of Conformity or Suitability for Use may exceptionally be incorporated into subsystems, on the condition that the provisions described in this section are met.
6.3.2. The Transition Period
The transition period shall commence from the entry into force of this TSI and shall last for six years.
Once the transition period has ended, and with the exceptions allowed under section 6.3.3.3 below, interoperability constituents shall be covered by the required EC declaration of conformity and/or suitability for use before being incorporated into the subsystem;
6.3.3. The Certification of Subsystems Containing Non-Certified Interoperability Constituents during the Transition Period
6.3.3.1. Conditions
During the transition period a Notified Body is permitted to issue a certificate of conformity for a subsystem, even if some of the interoperability constituents incorporated within the subsystem are not covered by the relevant EC declarations of conformity and/or suitability for use according to this TSI, if the following three criteria are complied with:
— |
the conformity of the subsystem has been checked in relation to the requirements defined in chapter 4 of this TSI by the Notified Body, and |
— |
through carrying out additional assessments the Notified Body confirms that the conformity and/or the suitability for use of the interoperability constituents is in accordance with the requirements of chapter 5, and |
— |
the interoperability constituents, which are not covered by the relevant EC declaration of conformity and/or suitability for use, shall have been used in a subsystem already put in service in at least one of the Member States before the entry in force of this TSI.
|
6.3.3.2. Notification
— |
the certificate of conformity of the subsystem shall indicate clearly which interoperability constituents have been assessed by the Notified Body as part of the subsystem verification. |
— |
the EC declaration of verification of the subsystem shall indicate clearly:
|
6.3.3.3. Lifecycle Implementation
The production or upgrade/renewal of the subsystem concerned must be completed within the six years of the transition period. Concerning the subsystem lifecycle:
— |
During the transition period and |
— |
under the responsibility of the body having issued the declaration of EC verification of the subsystem the interoperability constituents which do not hold an EC declaration of conformity and/suitability for use and are of the same type built by the same manufacturer are permitted to be used for maintenance related replacements and as spare parts for the subsystem. After the transition period has ended and |
— |
until the subsystem is upgraded, renewed or replaced and |
— |
under the responsibility of the body having issued the declaration of EC verification of the subsystem the interoperability constituents which do not hold an EC declaration of conformity and/suitability for use and are of the same type built by the same manufacturer may continue to be used for maintenance related replacements. |
6.3.4. Monitoring Arrangements
During the transition period Member States shall monitor:
— |
The number and type of interoperability constituents introduced on the market within their own State; |
— |
Ensure that, where a subsystem is presented for authorisation, reasons for non-certification of the interoperability constituent by the manufacturer are identified; |
— |
Notify, to the Commission and to the other Member States, the details of the non-certified IC and the reasons for non-certification. |
7. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ROLLING STOCK TSI
7.1. Implementation of the TSI
7.1.1. Newly built rolling stock of new design
7.1.1.1. Definitions
For the purpose of this section 7.1.1 and of section 7.1.2.1:
— |
Phase A period is the period starting when a notified body is appointed and provided with a description of the rolling stock intended to be developed and built or acquired. |
— |
Phase B period is the period starting when a type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification is issued by a notified body, and ending when this type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification ceases to be valid. |
7.1.1.2. General
— |
The type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification for subsystem and/or |
— |
type or design examination certificate of conformity and/or suitability for use for interoperability constituents, |
are permitted to be requested by any applicant as defined in clauses 6.2.1 and 6.1.1 respectively.
The applicant shall announce its intent for development and assessment of new rolling stock and/or IC to a notified body chosen in accordance with Chapter 6 of this TSI. Together with this announcement, the applicant shall provide a description of the rolling stock or of the IC it intends to develop and build or acquire.
7.1.1.3. Phase A
Following the date of appointment of the notified body, the certification basis to the currently valid TSI at the date of the appointment for the specified rolling stock shall be fixed for a seven year phase A period, except for specific requirements where Article 19 of Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, is applied.
When a revised version, including this one, of the TSI comes into force during the phase A period it is permissible to use the revised version, either totally or for discrete sections, if both the applicant and the notified body agree to do so. These arrangements shall be documented.
After a positive assessment, a notified body shall issue the type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification for the subsystem or the type or design examination certificateof conformity and/or suitability for use for the interoperability constituent.
7.1.1.4. Phase B
(a) Subsystem requirements
This type or design examination certificate for the subsystem is valid for a seven year phase B period even if a new TSI comes into force except in case of use of Article 19 of Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC. During this time, new rolling stock of the same type is permitted to be placed into service without a new type assessment.
Before the end of the seven year phase B period, rolling stock shall be assessed according to the TSI in force at that time for those requirements that have changed or are new in comparison to the certification basis.
— |
If a derogation is requested and accepted, the existing type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification remains valid for another three year phase B period. Before the end of the three years the same process of assessment and application for derogation is permitted to take place again. |
— |
If the design of the subsystem is compliant the type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification shall remain valid for a further seven year phase B period. |
In the event that no new TSI comes into force before the end of the phase B period, assessment of the rolling stock is not required and the relevant certification shall remain in force for a further seven year phase B period.
(b) Interoperability constituent requirement
The type or design examination or suitability for use certificate is valid for a five year phase B period even if a new TSI comes into force except in case of use of Article 19 of Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC. During this time, new constituents of the same type are permitted to be placed into service without an assessment.
Before the end of the five-year phase B period, constituent shall be assessed according to the TSI in force at that time for those requirements that have changed or are new in comparison to the certification basis.
If a derogation is requested and accepted, the existing type or design examination or suitability for use certificate of ‘EC’ verification remains valid for another three year phase B period. Before the end of the three years the same process of assessment and application for derogation is permitted to take place once more only.
7.1.2. Newly built rolling stock of an existing design certified to an existing TSI
The existing type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification for the subsystem is valid for a seven year phase B period after its issue date even if a new TSI comes into force except for specific requirements where Article 19 of Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, is applied. During this time, new rolling stock of the same type is permitted to be placed into service without a new type assessment.
Before the end of the seven year phase B period, rolling stock shall be assessed according to the TSI in force at that time for those requirements that have changed or are new in comparison to the certification basis.
— |
If a derogation is requested and accepted, the existing type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification remains valid for a further three year phase B period. Before the end of the three years the same process of assessment and application for derogation is permitted to take place again. |
— |
If the design of the subsystem is compliant the type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification remains valid for a further seven-year phase B period. |
In the event that no new TSI comes into force before the end of the phase B period, assessment of the rolling stock is not required and the relevant certification shall remain in force for a further seven year phase B period.
For interoperability constituents the process described in clause 7.1.1.4 is also valid for newly built rolling stock of an existing design certified to an existing TSI.
7.1.3. Rolling stock of an existing design
Rolling stock, whose design is not certified in accordance with the TSIs shall be subject to the conditions described in section 7.1.7.
Existing rolling stock is rolling stock which is already in service before this TSI enters into force.
This TSI does not apply to existing rolling stock as long as it is not renewed or upgraded.
7.1.4. Rolling stock being upgraded or renewed
In respect of rolling stock already in operation this section applies to existing high-speed trains and conventional rolling stock to be upgraded for high speed operation, as defined in Article 2 clause (l) and (n) of Directive 96/48 amended by Directive 2004/50/EC.
A new assessment against the requirements of the TSI that is in force at the date of request is required only for the modifications that are within the scope of this TSI.
Guidance for those modifications that are deemed to be upgrades or renewals is given below.
The following list indicates as informative guidance those modifications that necessitate reassessment of a vehicle design. This list is not exhaustive (the parameter changes quoted below are valid only if the total change remains within the limits of the TSI):
— |
Alterations to vehicle parameters affecting running performance beyond the simplified procedure (λ). λ is defined in clause 5.5.5 of EN14363:2005.
|
— |
Raising Vmax by more than 10 km/h |
— |
Alteration of total vehicle weight by more than 10 % |
— |
Raising of static axle load by more than 1,5 t |
— |
Alteration of concepts for
|
7.1.5. Noise
7.1.5.1. Transitional period
It is allowable to apply limits 2 dB(A) higher than those stated in section 4 and clause 7.3 of this TSI for external noise from rolling stock within the scope of this TSI within a transitional period of 24 months starting from the date of entry into force of this TSI. This allowance is restricted to the case of:
— |
contracts already signed or under the final phase of the tendering procedure at the date of entry into force of this TSI, and options to these contracts to purchase additional vehicles, or |
— |
contracts for purchasing new rolling stock of an existing design type signed during this transitional period. |
The transitional period of 24 months is extended to 60 months in the case of DMUs where the power per diesel engine is more than or equal to 500 kW.
7.1.5.2. Upgrading or renewal of rolling stock
It has only to be proved that an upgraded or renewed vehicle does not increase noise with respect to the performance of the vehicle before upgrading or renewal.
7.1.5.3. A two step approach
It is recommended that in the case of new rolling stock to be ordered after 1 January 2010 Section 4.2.1.1 and Section 4.2.6.5.4 of this TSI is applied with a reduction of 2 dB(A) at a speed of 250km/h, and 3 dB(A) at speeds of 300km/h and 320km/h. This recommendation will serve only as a basis for revising section 4.2.6.5.4 in the context of the TSI revision process mentioned in section 7.1.10
7.1.6. Mobile toilet discharge trolleys [clause 4.2.9.3]
First step: the infrastructure manager and the railway undertaking examine together the rolling stock roster project proposed by the railway undertaking, and identify the areas of the interoperable network, on the route under consideration, where it should be possible (according to this rolling stock roster project) to discharge the train toilets when needed, and where there are not (or not enough) toilet emptying fixed facilities allowing this operation on those trains.
Second step: the infrastructure manager and the railway undertaking carry out together an economic study leading to modifications of the rolling stock roster. Those modifications, regarding the number and/or the location of the areas where it will be possible to discharge the train toilets when needed, minimise the number of mobile toilet discharge trolleys (complying with this TSI) that will have to be placed on those areas.
7.1.7. Measures to prevent fire — material conformity
Pending publication of EN45545-2 or of an annex to this TSI, conformity with the requirement in clause 4.2.7.2.2 shall be deemed to be satisfied by the verification of conformity to the material fire safety requirements of the notified national rules (using the appropriate operation category) from one of the following sets of standards:
— |
the British standards BS6853, GM/RT2120 issue 2 and AV/ST9002 issue 1; |
— |
the French standards NF F 16-101:1988 and NF F 16-102/1992; |
— |
the German standard DIN 5510-2:2003 including toxicity measurements, fire safety category 2 (standard currently being supplemented by requirements for toxicity; toxicity requirements from other standards may be utilised as appropriate until the supplement is completed) |
— |
the Italian standards UNI CEI 11170-1:2005 and UNI CEI 11170-3:2005. |
— |
the Polish standards PN-K-02511:2000 and PN-K-02502:1992. |
7.1.8. Rolling stock operating under national, bilateral, multilateral or international agreements
7.1.8.1. Existing agreements
Member States shall notify the Commission, within 6 months after the entry into force of this TSI, of the following agreements under which rolling stock related to the scope of this TSI (construction, renewal, upgrading, placing in service, operation and management of rolling stock as defined in chapter 2 of this TSI) are operated:
— |
national, bilateral or multilateral agreements between Member States/Safety Authorities and railway undertakings or infrastructure managers, agreed on either a permanent or temporary basis; |
— |
bilateral or multilateral agreements between railway undertakings, infrastructure managers or between Member States/Safety Authorities; |
— |
international agreements between one or more Member States and at least one third country, or between railway undertakings or infrastructure managers of Member States and at least one railway undertaking or infrastructure manager of a third country; |
Continued operation/maintenance of rolling stock covered by these agreements shall be permitted as far as they comply with Community legislation.
The compatibility of these agreements with EU legislation including their non-discriminatory character, and this TSI, will be assessed by the European Rail Agency and the Commission will take the necessary measures such as, for example, the revision of this TSI to include possible specific cases or transitional measures.
The RIC Agreement shall not be notified because it is known.
7.1.8.2. Future agreements
Any future agreement or modification of existing agreements, in particular those which include the procurement of rolling stock whose design is not certified in accordance with the TSIs, shall take into account EU legislation and this TSI. Member States shall notify the Commission of such agreements/modifications. The same procedure as set out in clause 7.1.7.1 then applies.
7.1.9. TSI revision
In conformity with Article 6(3) of Directive 96/48/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, the Agency shall be responsible for preparing the review and updating of TSIs and making appropriate recommendations to the Committee referred to in Article 21 of this Directive in order to take account of developments in technology or social requirements. In addition, the progressive adoption and revision of other TSIs may also impact this TSI. Proposed changes to this TSI shall be subject to rigorous review and updated TSIs will be published on an indicative periodic basis of 3 years.
The Agency shall be notified of any innovative solutions being considered by an applicant according to section 6.1.4 or 6.2.3, or by notified bodies when the applicant failed to do so in order to determine its future inclusion within the TSI.
Then the Agency shall proceed according to section 6.1.4 or 6.2.3.
7.2. Compatibility of rolling stock with other subsystems
The implementation of the High Speed Rolling Stock TSI shall comply with the requirement of full compatibility between the rolling stock and the fixed installations, including infrastructure, energy and control-command of the trans-European high-speed network
Following this, the implementation methods and phases concerning rolling stock depend on the following conditions:
— |
the progress of implementation of the High-Speed Infrastructure, Energy, Control-Command and Signalling and Operation TSIs, |
— |
the rolling stock operational schemes (rosters) |
The migration strategy for the on-board control-command system is described in the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006 clause 7.2.2.5.
The tools to ensure the technical compatibility requirements as well as to take into account the fore-mentioned conditions are:
— |
The infrastructure register; |
— |
The rolling stock register. |
7.3. Specific cases
7.3.1. General
The following special provisions are authorised in the following specific cases.
These specific cases are classified according to two categories: the provisions apply either permanently (‘P’ cases), or temporarily (‘T’ cases). It is recommended that the target system of the temporary cases is achieved either by 2010 (‘T1’ cases), an objective set in European Parliament and Council Decision No 1692/96/EC of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, or by 2020 (‘T2’ cases).
7.3.2. List of specific cases
7.3.2.1. General specific case on the 1 524 mm gauge network
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
In the territory of Finland and at Swedish cross-border station Haparanda (1 524 mm), the bogies, wheelsets and other track gauge interfaces related interoperability constituents or/and subsystems built for track gauge 1 524 mm network are only accepted, if they comply with the following mentioned Finnish specific cases for track gauge interfaces. Without prejudice to the above-mentioned restriction (1 524 mm gauge) all the interoperability constituents and/or subsystems complying with the TSI requirements for 1 435 mm track gauge are accepted at Finnish cross-border station Tornio (1 435 mm) and at train-ferry harbours on the tracks for 1 435 mm.
7.3.2.2. End couplers and coupling arrangements to rescue trains [clause 4.2.2.2]
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
The distance between buffer centrelines is permitted to be 1 830 mm. Alternatively, it is permitted that this rolling stock be equipped with SA-3 couplers with or without side buffers.
Where the distance between the buffer centrelines is 1 790 mm, the width of the buffer plates shall be increased by 40 mm towards the outside.
7.3.2.3. Passenger step [clause 4.2.2.4.1]
Note: specific cases from the PRM TSI will be incorporated here later.
7.3.2.4. Vehicle gauge [clause 4.2.3.1]
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
Rolling stock intended for operation in Finland (1 524 mm) shall comply with gauge FIN 1 as defined in Annex R
Specific case for lines in Great Britain:
Category ‘P’- permanent
Trains designed for running on upgraded lines in Great Britain shall comply with gauge ‘UK1 (issue2)’ as defined in Annex C to this TSI.
Specific case for trains running on Ireland and Northern Ireland networks:
Category ‘P’- permanent
The gauge of trains designed for running on lines of the Ireland and Northern Ireland networks shall be compatible with the Irish standard structure gauge.
7.3.2.5. Vehicle mass [clause 4.2.3.2]
Specific case France:
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 3.1.4 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006
Specific case Belgium high-speed TEN (except ‘L1’):
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 3.1.5 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
7.3.2.6. Electrical resistance of wheelsets [clause 4.2.3.3.1]
Specific case Poland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 3.5.2 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
Specific case France:
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 3.5.3 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006
Specific case Netherlands:
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 3.5.4 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
Specific case on the 1520/1524 mm gauge network
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 6.4 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
7.3.2.7. Hot axle box detection for Class 2 trains [clause 4.2.3.3.2.3]
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
Functional requirements for the vehicle
Mutual agreement between the infrastructure-manager and the railway undertaking is requested to identify trains by train identification systems and use of specific alarm trigger levels. Specific alarm trigger levels shall be listed in the rolling stock register
Transverse dimensions of the target area
For rolling stock intended to be used on Finnish network (1 524mm track gauge) the target areas on the underside of an axle box that shall remain un-obstructed to permit observation by a trackside HABD shall be the following:
— |
minimum uninterrupted length of 50mm within a transverse minimum distance from the wheelset-centre of 1 020mm and a maximum transverse distance from the wheelset centre of 1 140mm |
— |
minimum uninterrupted length of 15mm within a transverse minimum distance from the wheelset-centre of 885mm and a maximum transverse distance from the wheelset centre of 903mm |
Longitudinal dimension of the target area
The longitudinal dimension on the underside of the axle box that shall remain unobstructed to permit observation by a trackside HABD (see figure below) shall:
— |
be centred on the wheelset’s centreline, |
— |
have a minimum length L (mm) = 200mm |
7.3.2.8. Wheel-rail contact (wheel profiles) [4.2.3.4.4]
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
Wheelsets of trains designed for running on lines of the Finnish network shall be compatible with the track gauge of 1 524mm.
Specific case for trains running on Ireland and Northern Ireland networks:
Category ‘P’- permanent
Wheelsets of trains designed for running on lines of the Ireland and Northern Ireland networks shall be compatible with the track gauge of 1 602mm.
7.3.2.9. Wheelsets [4.2.3.4.9]
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
The dimensions for wheelsets and wheels related to 1 520 and 1 524 mm track gauges are given in Annex M Table M.2.
7.3.2.10. Maximum train length [4.2.3.5]
Specific case for Great Britain
Category ‘P’- permanent
The High Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006 contains a specific case for the British network requiring platforms on upgraded lines to have a usable length of at least 300m. The actual length of platforms on upgraded lines in Great Britain where trains complying with the High Speed Rolling Stock TSI are intended to stop in normal commercial operation will be indicated in the infrastructure register. The length of high speed trains intended for operation on the British network shall be compatible with the length of the platforms at which they are intended to stop.
Specific case for Greece.
Category ‘P’ — permanent
The High Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006 contains a specific case for the Greek network requiring platforms on certain upgraded lines to have a usable length ranging from 150m to 300m as described in detail in said specific case.
The length of trains complying with the High Speed Rolling Stock TSI intended for operation on the Greek network shall be compatible with the length of the platforms at which they are intended to stop.
7.3.2.11. Sanding [4.2.3.10]
Specific case on the 1520/1524 mm gauge network
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 6. of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006
7.3.2.12. Braking [clause 4.2.4]
7.3.2.12.1. General
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
If the nominal speed exceeds 140 km/h at least one bogie shall be equipped with a magnetic track brake. If the nominal speed exceeds 180 km/h both bogies shall be equipped with magnetic track brakes. The track brakes in both cases shall be equipped with heating
The requirements set for the brake performance on steep gradients are not valid for vehicles for 1 524 mm gauge.
For vehicles used on 1 524 mm gauge, the parking brake shall be designed in such a way that fully loaded coaches shall be held on a gradient of 2,5 % with maximum wheel/rail adhesion of 0,15 with no wind.
7.3.2.12.2. Eddy current brakes [clause 4.2.4.5]
Specific case for Germany
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 5.2.3 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006
Specific case for Sweden
Category ‘P’- permanent
The use of eddy current brakes for emergency braking or service braking is not allowed on the Swedish network.
7.3.2.13. Environmental conditions [clause 4.2.6.1]
Specific case for Finland, Sweden and Norway:
Category ‘P’- permanent
Humidity
Sudden changes of the air temperature local to the vehicle shall be considered for a maximum variation of 60oK.
7.3.2.14. Train Aerodynamics
7.3.2.14.1. Aerodynamic loads on passengers on a platform [clause 4.2.6.2.2]
Specific case for UK
Category ‘P’ — Permanent
A full length train, running in the open air at v =200 km/h, (or at its maximum operating speed if this is lower), shall not cause the air speed to exceed the value u2σ =11,5 m/s at a height of 1,2 m above the platform and at a distance of 3,0 m from the track centre, during the whole train passage (including the wake). The platform height used in the assessment shall be 915 mm or lower. All other testing conditions are as set out in 4.2.6.2.2.
7.3.2.14.2. Pressure loads in open air [clause 4.2.6.2.3]
Specific case for UK:
Category ‘P’- permanent
On upgraded lines in the UK the maximum permissible pressure change (Δp2σ) shall be 665 Pa for all trains.
7.3.2.14.3. Maximum pressure variations in tunnels [clause 4.2.6.4]
Specific case for Italy:
Category ‘P’- permanent
To take account of the numerous tunnels with a cross-section of 54 m2 which are traversed at 250 km/h, and those with a cross-section of 82,5 m2 and traversed at 300 km/h, trains operating on the Italian network shall conform to the requirements set out in Table 24.
Table 24
Requirements for interoperable train in a solo-run in a non-inclined tube-like tunnel (Specific Case Italy)
Train type |
Gauge |
Reference Case |
Criteria for the Reference Case |
Allowed maximum speed [km/h] |
|||
Vtr [km/h] |
Atu [m2] |
ΔpN [Pa] |
ΔpN+ΔpFr [Pa] |
ΔpN+ΔpFr+ΔpT [Pa] |
|||
Vtr,max < 250 km/h |
GA or smaller |
200 |
53,6 |
≤ 1 750 |
≤ 3 000 |
≤ 3 700 |
≤ 210 |
GB |
200 |
53,6 |
≤ 1 750 |
≤ 3 000 |
≤ 3 700 |
≤ 210 |
|
GC |
200 |
53,6 |
≤ 1 750 |
≤ 3 000 |
≤ 3 700 |
≤ 210 |
|
Vtr,max < 250 km/h |
GA or smaller |
200 |
53,6 |
≤ 1 195 |
≤ 2 145 |
≤ 3 105 |
< 250 |
GB |
200 |
53,6 |
≤ 1 285 |
≤ 2 310 |
≤ 3 340 |
< 250 |
|
GC |
200 |
53,6 |
≤ 1 350 |
≤ 2 530 |
≤ 3 455 |
< 250 |
|
Vtr,max≥ 250 km/h |
GA or smaller |
250 |
53,6 |
≤ 1 870 |
≤ 3 355 |
≤ 4 865 |
250 |
Vtr,max≥ 250 km/h |
GA or smaller |
250 |
63,0 |
≤ 1 460 |
≤ 2 620 |
≤ 3 800 |
> 250 |
GB |
250 |
63,0 |
≤ 1 550 |
≤ 2 780 |
≤ 4 020 |
> 250 |
|
GC |
250 |
63,0 |
≤ 1 600 |
≤ 3 000 |
≤ 4 100 |
> 250 |
If a trainset does not fulfil the values specified in Table 24, the operation rules for this train shall be determined by applying the published rules of the infrastructure manager.
7.3.2.15. Boundary characteristics linked to exterior noise [clause 4.2.6.5]
7.3.2.15.1. Limit for stationary noise [clause 4.2.6.5.2]
Specific case for UK and Ireland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
For DMU's, the limit for stationary noise LpAEq, T shall be 77dB(A).
7.3.2.15.2. Limit for starting noise [clause 4.2.6.5.3]
Specific case for UK and Ireland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
For electric locomotives with P<4500 kW at the wheel rim, the maximum starting noise LpAFmax shall be 84dB(A).
7.3.2.16. Fire extinguisher [clause 4.2.7.2.3.2]
Specific case for Italy:
Category ‘T2’- temporary
To take into account the duration of the process of updating national regulations, it is permitted that domestic trains operating on the Italian network on national routes are equipped with portable dry powder extinguishers.
Portable dry powder extinguishers shall be adequate and sufficient and shall be placed at appropriate locations.
7.3.2.17. Horns [clause 4.2.7.4.2.1]
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
Class 2 trains shall be fitted with horns with two distinct tones. The notes of the audible warning horns are intended to be recognisable as being from a train and not be similar to warning devices used in road transport or as factory or other common warning devices. Two separately sounded warning horns shall be used. The fundamental frequencies of the warning horn notes shall be:
– high note |
: |
800 Hz ± 20 Hz |
– low note |
: |
460 Hz ± 20 Hz |
Specific case for Italy:
Category ‘T2’- temporary
To take into account the duration of the process of updating national regulations, it is permitted that domestic trains operating on the Italian network on national routes are equipped with horns with fundamental frequencies of:
– high note |
: |
660 Hz ± 15 Hz |
– low note |
: |
370 Hz ± 10 Hz |
The sound pressure level for these frequencies shall be between 120dB and 125dB using the measuring method described in clause 4.2.7.4.2.
7.3.2.18. Control-command and signalling system [clause 4.2.7.9]
7.3.2.18.1. Wheelset location [clause 4.2.7.9.2]
Specific case for Germany:
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 2.1.5 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006
Specific case for Poland and Belgium:
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 2.1.6 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
Specific case for France high-speed Trans European Network (TEN) and Belgium high-speed TEN ‘L1’ only:
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 2.1.8 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
Specific case for Belgium:
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 2.1.9 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006
Specific case on the 1520/1524 mm gauge network
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 6.2 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
7.3.2.18.2. Wheels [clause 4.2.7.9.3]
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
Due to the Nordic climatic conditions, a specific wheel material is generally used in Finland and in Norway. It is similar to ER8 but with a level of manganese and silicon increased to improved properties against shelling. For domestic traffic this material may be used if agreed between the parties.
Specific case for France:
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 2.2.2 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
Specific case for Lithuania:
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 2.2.4 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
7.3.2.19. Pantograph [clause 4.2.8.3.6.]
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
Trains operating on the Finnish network should be equipped with 1 950 mm pantograph. The profile of the pantograph head shall be as described below:
— |
Horn made of insulating material (projected length 200mm) |
— |
Minimum length of the contact strip 1 100 mm |
— |
Conducting range of collector head 1 550 mm |
— |
Pantograph head length 1 950 mm |
The normal height of the contact wire is 6 150 mm (min 5 600 mm, max 6 500 mm)
Pantograph heads shall have a maximum along track width of 400 mm.
Specific case for France:
Category T2
Copper and steel materials are permitted to be used for the contact strip on the DC network
Category P
Trains on DC lines are permitted to be equipped with a 1 950 mm wide pantograph heads.
Category P
High speed trains required to operate in France and Switzerland are permitted to be fitted with 1 450 mm wide pantographs heads.
Specific Case for Germany and Austria:
Category ‘P’ — permanent
The investment of changing the overhead line equipment on category II and III lines and in stations to meet the requirements of the 1 600 mm Euro pantograph is prohibitive. Trains traversing these lines shall be provided with secondary 1 950 mm pantographs for medium-speed operation up to 230 km/h so that the overhead line equipment on these parts of the trans-European network need not to be prepared for the operation of the Euro pantograph. In these areas a maximum lateral contact wire position of 550 mm is permissible related to the vertical on the track centre line under action of crosswind. Future studies concerning category II and III lines should take into account the Euro pantograph to demonstrate the relevance of the choices made.
Specific case for trains running on Great Britain network:
Category ‘P’- permanent
For lines in Categories II and III, pantograph heads shall not have insulated horns, unless permitted for specific routes by an entry in the infrastructure register.
For lines in Categories II and III, the conducting range of the pantograph head shall be 1 300mm.
Pantographs shall have a working range of 2,1 m.
Pantograph heads shall have a maximum along track width of 400 mm.
Specific case for trains running on the Swedish network:
Category ‘P’ — permanent
Trains traversing category II and III lines shall be provided with secondary 1 800 mm pantographs for medium-speed operation up to 230 km/h
For traffic across the Öresund Bridge into Sweden, 1 950 mm pantographs are permitted.
Capacitive power factor is not allowed at voltages over 16,5 kV, due to the risk of making it hard or impossible for other vehicles to use regenerative braking because of too high a voltage on the overhead line.
In regeneration mode (electrical braking), the train shall not behave like a capacitor greater than 60 kVAr at any regenerated power, i.e. capacitive power factor is prohibited during regeneration. The exception of 60 kVAr capacitive reactive power is to allow the possibility to have filters on the high voltage side of the train/traction unit. These filters shall not exceed 60 kVAr capacitive reactive power at the fundamental frequency.
Specific case for trains running on the Spanish network:
Category ‘P’ — permanent
On some category II and III lines and in stations the 1 600mm Europantograph is not permitted. Trains traversing these lines shall be provided with secondary 1 950 mm pantographs for medium-speed operation up to 230 km/h.
The investment of changing the overhead contact line on category II and III lines and in stations to meet the requirements of the 1 600 mm Euro pantograph is prohibitive. Trains traversing these lines shall be provided with secondary 1 950 mm pantographs for medium-speed operation up to 230 km/h so that the overhead contact lines on these parts of the trans-European network needs not be prepared for the operation of the Euro pantograph. In these areas a maximum lateral contact wire position of 550 mm related to the vertical on the track centre line is permissible under action of crosswind. Future studies concerning category II and III lines shall take into account the Euro pantograph to demonstrate the relevance of the choices made.
Pantograph gauge envelope
For lines in Categories II and III, pantographs of vehicles used in Great Britain shall remain within the gauge defined in the diagram below. This is an absolute gauge, and not a reference profile subject to adjustments. The means of demonstrating compliance is an Open Point
The Pantograph Envelope
The diagram shows the extreme envelope within which movements of the pantograph head must remain. The envelope shall be placed on the extreme position of track centrelines permitted by track tolerances, which are not included. The envelope is not a Reference Profile.
At all speeds up to line speed; maximum cant; maximum wind speed at which unrestricted operation is possible, and extreme wind speed, defined in the register of infrastructure:
W = 990 mm, |
when H ≤ 4 300 mm; |
and
W′ = 990 + (0,040 × (H – 4 300 )) mm, |
when H > 4 300 mm. |
Where:
H = Height to top of envelope above rail level (in mm). The dimension is the sum of the contact wire height and the provision for uplift.
Additional allowance shall be made for contact strip wear.
Specific case Italy:
Category ‘P’- permanent
High speed trains required to operate in Italy and Switzerland are permitted to be fitted with 1 450 mm wide pantographs heads.
7.3.2.20. Interfaces with control-command and signalling system [clause 4.2.8.3.8]
Specific case Belgium:
Category ‘P’- permanent
This specific case is specified in clause 3.6.1 of Annex A Appendix 1 of the Control-Command and Signalling TSI 2006.
7.3.2.21. Toilet discharge system connections [clause 4.2.9.3.]
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
The connections for emptying and for rinsing and their seals shall comply with figures M VI1 and M VI2 respectively of Annex M VI.
7.3.2.22. Water filling adapters [clause 4.2.9.5.]
Specific case for Finland:
Category ‘P’- permanent
The water filling adapters shall be as shown in Figure M VII3 of Annex M VII.
7.3.2.23. Fire Standards [clause 7.1.6]
Specific Case for Spain
Category ‘T’ — temporary
Until EN45545-2 is published the Spanish rules on fir standards (DT-PCI/5A) will apply
(1) In cases where loading is not possible, alternative methods are permissible, such as simulation by isolating further brake units provided they do not introduce significant errors in the procedure
(2) Higher power factors than 0,8 will result in better economic performance due to a reduced requirement for fixed equipment provision.
(*) Modules A1 and H1 are allowed for existing solutions only under conditions defined in clause 6.1.3
ANNEXES TO THE TSI
‘Rolling stock’ Sub-System
ANNEX A |
Passive safety — crashworthiness | 269 |
A.1 |
Detailed description of the static and passive safety requirements | 269 |
A.1.1 |
Detailed mechanical boundary characteristics for the static resistance | 269 |
A.1.2 |
Detailed mechanical boundary characteristics for passive safety strength | 269 |
A.1.2.1 |
Mass definition | 269 |
A.1.2.2 |
Dynamic Strength | 269 |
A.1.2.3 |
Assessment criteria | 269 |
A.2 |
Detailed specification for passive safety | 270 |
A.3 |
Acceptance criteria | 270 |
A.3.1 |
Reduce the risk of overriding | 270 |
A.3.2 |
Limit deceleration | 270 |
A.3.3 |
Maintain survival space and structural integrity of the passengers occupied areas | 270 |
A.3.4 |
Protection against a low obstacle | 271 |
A.4 |
Validation method | 271 |
A.4.1 |
Process: | 271 |
A.4.2 |
Test specifications | 272 |
A.4.3 |
Acceptance criteria for calibration | 273 |
A.5 |
Obstacle definitions | 273 |
A.5.1 |
For collisions between a train and a wagon of 80 tons with side buffers: | 273 |
A.5.2 |
For collisions between a train and a heavy obstacle at level crossing | 274 |
ANNEX B |
Anthropometric data and forward visibility for train drivers | 275 |
B.1 |
General | 275 |
B.2 |
Anthropometric data for drivers | 275 |
B.3 |
Signal position in relation to the driver’s cab. | 276 |
B.4 |
Reference positions of driver’s eyes | 276 |
ANNEX C |
UK1 (issue 2) Gauge | 278 |
C.1 |
The UK1 (issue 2) profiles | 278 |
C.2 |
Lower sector UK1[A] profile below 1 100 mm arl | 279 |
C.3 |
Upper sector UK1[B] profile above 1 100 mm arl | 280 |
C.4 |
Upper sector UK1[D] profile above 1 100 mm arl | 281 |
C.5 |
Application of UK1[A] profile | 282 |
C.6 |
Application of UK1[B] profile | 282 |
C.7 |
Application of UK1[D] profile | 282 |
C.8 |
Calculation of width reduction | 282 |
ANNEX D |
Assessment of interoperability constituents | 284 |
D.1 |
Scope | 284 |
D.2 |
Characteristics | 284 |
ANNEX E |
Assessment of the rolling stock subsystem | 285 |
E.1 |
Scope | 285 |
E.2 |
Characteristics and modules | 285 |
ANNEX F |
Procedures for assessment of conformity and suitability for use | 290 |
F.1 |
List of the modules | 290 |
F.2 |
Modules for interoperability constituents | 290 |
F.2.1 |
Module A: Internal production control | 290 |
F.2.2 |
Module A1: Internal Design Control with Production Verification | 291 |
F.2.3 |
Module B: Type Examination | 293 |
F.2.4 |
Module C: Conformity to Type | 296 |
F.2.5 |
Module D: Production Quality Management System | 296 |
F.2.6 |
Module F: Product Verification | 299 |
F.2.7 |
Module H1: Full Quality Management System | 301 |
F.2.8 |
Module H2: Full Quality Management System With Design Examination | 304 |
F.2.9 |
Module V: Type-Validation By In Service Experience (Suitability For Use) | 308 |
F.3 |
Modules for the ec verification of subsystems | 311 |
F.3.1 |
Module SB: Type Examination | 311 |
F.3.2 |
Module SD: Production Quality Management System | 313 |
F.3.3 |
Module SF: Product Verification | 318 |
F.3.4 |
Module SH2: Full Quality Management System with Design Examination | 321 |
F.4 |
Assessment of maintenance arrangements: conformity assessment procedure | 327 |
ANNEX G |
Effects of Crosswinds | 328 |
G.1 |
General remarks | 328 |
G.2 |
Introduction | 328 |
G.3 |
General principles | 328 |
G.4 |
Range of application | 328 |
G.5 |
Assessment of characteristic wind curves | 328 |
G.5.1 |
Aerodynamic properties determination | 328 |
G.5.1.1 |
General remarks | 328 |
G.5.1.2 |
Wind tunnel test requirements | 329 |
G.5.1.2.1 |
Test section dimensions | 329 |
G.5.1.2.2 |
Turbulence level | 329 |
G.5.1.2.3 |
Boundary layer | 329 |
G.5.1.2.4 |
Reynolds’ number | 329 |
G.5.1.2.5 |
Instrumentation | 329 |
G.5.1.3 |
Model requirements | 329 |
G.5.1.4 |
Test programme requirements | 330 |
G.5.2 |
Description of the Wind Scenario | 331 |
G.5.3 |
Calculation of the turbulence characteristics | 332 |
G.5.3.1 |
Turbulence Intensity | 332 |
G.5.3.2 |
Gust Duration | 332 |
G.5.3.3 |
Derivation of the resulting time history of the gust | 333 |
G.5.4 |
Vehicle dynamics determination | 334 |
G.5.4.1 |
General remarks | 334 |
G.5.4.2 |
Modelling | 335 |
G.5.4.3 |
Verification of the Vehicle Model | 335 |
G.6 |
Aerodynamic forces and moments as inputs for the multi-body simulation | 336 |
G.7 |
Calculation and representation of characteristic wind curves | 336 |
G.7.1 |
Evaluation of the Criterion | 336 |
G.7.2 |
Calculation of the Wind Values and Limiting Values for ΔQ/Q0 | 337 |
G.7.3 |
Considering Different Wind Angles | 337 |
G.7.4 |
Representation of Wind Characteristics by Distinct Points | 338 |
G.7.4.1 |
Vehicle on straight track | 338 |
G.7.4.2 |
Vehicle in a curve | 338 |
G.8 |
Required documentation | 338 |
ANNEX H |
Front and rear lamps | 339 |
H.1 |
Definitions | 339 |
H.2 |
Front lamps | 339 |
H.3 |
Rear lamps | 341 |
H.4 |
Conformity type testing of interoperable constituent | 342 |
ANNEX I |
Information required to appear in the ‘register of rolling stock’ | 344 |
I.1 |
General information | 344 |
I.2 |
Section A: Definition of the scope of the register of rolling stock | 344 |
I.3 |
Section B: Names of parties involved | 344 |
I.4 |
Section C: Conformity assessment | 345 |
I.5 |
Section D: Characteristics of the rolling stock | 345 |
I.5.1 |
Subsection D.1 for the rolling stock subsystem | 345 |
I.5.2 |
Subsection D.2 for the control-command and signalling subsystem | 345 |
I.5.3 |
Subsection D.3 for the energy subsystem | 346 |
I.6 |
Section E: Maintenance data | 346 |
ANNEX J |
Windscreen properties | 347 |
J.1 |
Optical properties | 347 |
J.1.1 |
Optical Distortion | 347 |
J.1.2 |
Secondary Images | 347 |
J.1.3 |
Haze | 348 |
J.1.4 |
Transmittance | 348 |
J.1.5 |
Chromaticity | 348 |
J.2 |
Structural requirements | 348 |
J 2.1 |
Impacts | 348 |
J.2.2 |
Spalling | 349 |
ANNEX K |
Coupler | 350 |
K.1 |
Schematic of the coupler | 350 |
K.2 |
Towing coupler used for recovery and rescue | 350 |
K.2.1 |
Definition of terms | 350 |
K.2.2 |
General conditions | 351 |
K.2.2.1 |
Speeds | 351 |
K.2.2.2 |
Brakes | 351 |
K.2.2.3 |
General Pneumatic connection | 351 |
K.2.2.4 |
Coupling Process | 351 |
K.2.2.5 |
Uncoupling conditions | 351 |
K.2.3 |
Towing a train fitted with an automatic coupler by means of a towing coupler | 351 |
K.2.3.1 |
General conditions | 351 |
K.2.3.2 |
Coupling conditions | 351 |
K.2.4 |
Towing a train fitted with a draw hook by means of a towing coupler | 352 |
K.2.4.1 |
General conditions | 352 |
K.2.4.2 |
Coupling conditions | 353 |
ANNEX L |
Aspects not specified in the High Speed Rolling Stock TSI and for which notification of national rules is required | 354 |
ANNEX M |
In service limits of the geometric dimensions of wheels and wheelsets | 356 |
ANNEX M I |
Not used | 359 |
ANNEX M II |
Not used | 359 |
ANNEX M III |
Not used | 359 |
ANNEX M IV |
Seals for the toilet discharge system connections | 360 |
ANNEX M V |
Inlet connections for water tanks | 362 |
ANNEX M VI |
Connections for the toilet discharge system on rolling stock | 363 |
ANNEX N: |
Measuring Conditions for Noise | 365 |
N.1 |
Deviations from en ISO 3095:2005 | 365 |
N.1.1 |
Stationary noise | 365 |
N.1.2 |
Starting noise | 366 |
N.1.3 |
Pass-by Noise | 366 |
N.1.4 |
Reference track for pass-by noise | 367 |
N.2 |
Characterisation of the dynamic performance of the reference tracks | 368 |
N.2.1 |
Measurement procedure | 368 |
N.2.2 |
Measurement system | 370 |
N.2.3 |
Data processing | 371 |
N.2.4 |
Test report | 372 |
ANNEX O |
Earth Protection of the vehicles’ metal parts | 373 |
O.1 |
Earthing principles | 373 |
O.2 |
Earthing of the vehicle bodyshell | 373 |
O.3 |
Earthing of the vehicle parts | 373 |
O.4 |
Earthing of electric installations | 373 |
O.5 |
Aerials | 374 |
ANNEX P |
Calculation method for decelerations in degraded mode and unfavourable climatic conditions | 375 |
P.1 |
Introduction | 375 |
P.2 |
Definition of Tests | 375 |
P.2.1 |
Dynamic tests | 375 |
P.2.1.1 |
Test conditions | 375 |
P.2.1.2 |
Dynamic test results | 376 |
P.2.1.3 |
Dynamic tests for adhesion dependant brakes | 376 |
P.2.2 |
Rig tests for determining the effects of reduced friction | 376 |
P.3 |
Deceleration Calculations | 377 |
P.3.1 |
Determination of braking forces F | 377 |
P.3.2 |
Evaluation of kw — Reduction coefficient due to degraded adhesion | 377 |
P.3.3 |
Evaluation of kh — Reduction coefficient due to degraded friction | 377 |
P.3.4 |
Decelerations calculations | 378 |
ANNEX Q |
Signs indicating the box which contains the resetting equipment of the emergency alarm | 379 |
ANNEX R |
Specific case-Gauge for Finland | 380 |
R.1 |
General rules | 380 |
R.2 |
Lower part of the vehicle | 380 |
R.3 |
Vehicle parts in proximity of the wheel flanges | 380 |
R.4 |
Vehicle width | 380 |
R.5 |
lower step and access doors opening outwards for coaches and multiple units | 381 |
R.6 |
Pantographs and non-insulated live parts on the roof | 381 |
R.7 |
Rules and later instructions | 381 |
APPENDIX R.A | 382 |
APPENDIX R.B1 | 383 |
APPENDIX R.B2 | 384 |
APPENDIX R.B3 | 385 |
APPENDIX R.C | 386 |
APPENDIX R.D1 | 388 |
APPENDIX R.D2 | 390 |
APPENDIX R.E Pantograph and non-insulated live parts | 392 |
ANNEX A
Passive safety — crashworthiness
A.1. Detailed description of the static and passive safety requirements
A.1.1. Detailed mechanical boundary characteristics for the static resistance
Detailed mechanical boundary characteristics for the mass and the static resistance are described in standard EN 12663:2000, the longitudinal and vertical static loads for the vehicle bodies corresponding to category P-II as minimum.
Assessment for pressure load shall be done by using a static requirement defined in clause 4.2.6.4 of this TSI.
A.1.2. Detailed mechanical boundary characteristics for passive safety strength
A.1.2.1. Mass definition
The mass shall include 50 % of the mass of the seated passengers fixed to the carbody floor
A.1.2.2. Dynamic Strength
Four design collision scenarios, which consider all combinations of leading end configuration (straight line, unbraked), shall be applied to certify the passive safety:
— |
Scenario 1 Collision between two identical trains (single units trainset or defined formation) at a relative speed of 36 km/h, |
— |
Scenario 2 Collision between a train (single units trainset or defined formation) and a railway vehicle equipped with side buffers at a speed of 36 km/h. The railway vehicle shall be a four-axle freight wagon with a mass of 80 tonnes, as defined in clause A.5. |
— |
Scenario 3 Collision at a speed of 110 km/h, on a level crossing, with an obstacle equivalent to a 15 t lorry as defined in clause A.5. |
— |
Scenario 4 Collision with a small or low obstacle such as a car or animal, which shall be addressed by defining the characteristics of an obstacle deflector. |
A.1.2.3. Assessment criteria
If assessing a locomotive, a power head or a driving coach a defined formation shall be used. For the crashworthy design of a locomotive, a power head or a driving coach, the locomotive, the power head or the driving coach shall be considered as the leading vehicle only.
If assessing a train with different end-vehicles, only identical vehicles shall be considered when calculating scenario 1.
If assessing a coach a defined formation shall be used in which the coach is considered in the position behind the locomotive, the power head or the driving coach.
In all cases the defined formation for which validation is carried out shall be clearly defined.
All vehicles compliant to this TSI and which conform to the following characteristics of the first coach behind the leading vehicle of the defined formation shall be accepted for use in interoperable trains without further certification of the train.
— |
The mass shall be equal or less than the mass of the first coach behind the leading vehicle of the defined formation. |
— |
The peak force shall be equal or less than the peak force of the first coach behind the leading vehicle of the defined formation. |
— |
The mean force shall be equal or less than the mean force applied to the leading vehicle by the first coach of the defined formation behind this leading vehicle. In order to compare the mean levels according to the deformation stroke, the energy-stroke characteristics shall be used. The energy-stroke curve shall be equal or lower than the one of the reference vehicle. |
A.2. Detailed specification for passive safety
Overriding risk shall be reduced at the train extremities and between the vehicles comprising the train.
The forces experienced in the crumple zones shall not result in mean decelerations exceeding the acceptance criteria specified in clause A.3 in passenger seated areas and survival spaces
For all scenarios the occupied areas shall not experience any deformations or intrusion which compromise the design survival space and the structural integrity of the passengers occupied areas.
An obstacle deflector shall be fitted at the leading end of the train to reduce the probability of objects such as cars and large animals causing derailment.
Drivers’ cabs at the ends of vehicles shall have a minimum of one door or a gangway allowing access for rescue staff in an emergency.
The acceptance criteria are prescribed in clause A.3 and the Validation Procedure shall be in accordance with clause A.4.
A.3. Acceptance criteria
A.3.1. Reduce the risk of overriding
The acceptance criterion for the overriding limitation are that an additional simulation of scenario 1 demonstrates that under the initial vertical offset conditions of 40 mm no lifting of all wheel sets of any bogie occurs and that survival space and deceleration limit requirements are maintained. These criteria alone are sufficient for the validation of overriding resistance.
A.3.2. Limit deceleration
The acceptance criterion for the mean deceleration is 5 g in the occupied areas. The duration for the mean calculation shall correspond to the time from when the net contact force first exceeds zero to the time when the net contact force reaches zero (for the first time) for all collision-involved vehicles in the train.
A.3.3. Maintain survival space and structural integrity of the passengers occupied areas
The driver's cab shall have a survival space for the driver maintaining a section of a minimum of 0,75m length.
The acceptance criteria for the integrity of the passenger occupied areas shall be to limit any reduction to not more than 1 % over 5 m of the initial length of the carbody (except crumple zones) or that the plastic strain in these protected areas shall be less than 10 %.
If adjacent areas of temporary occupation, as defined in clause 4.2.2.3.2, with a lateral dimension greater than 250 mm, are utilised as crumple zones, any longitudinal clearance shall not be reduced by more than 30 % in that zone.
The following diagram gives examples of areas where longitudinal clearance requirements apply:
A.3.4. Protection against a low obstacle
An obstacle deflector, with its lower edge as low as the gauge permits, shall be fitted at the leading end of the train and shall be verified by the following longitudinal static requirements, to be met separately:
— |
300 kN on the centreline. |
— |
250 kN at 750 mm from the centreline |
The horizontal forces shall be applied over a maximum area of 500 mm by 500 mm. (As permitted by the coupler movement envelope and the maximum corresponding surface of the deflector)
The height of the resultant force shall be not more than 500 mm above rail level.
There shall be no permanent deformation due to these loads. The static resistance of the obstacle deflector shall be compliant with clause 3.4.2 of EN 12663:2000.
A.4. Validation method
A.4.1. Process
The passive safety objectives are given for a complete train. It is impractical to evaluate complete train behaviour by testing therefore the achievement of the objectives shall be validated by dynamic simulation, which correspond to the design collisions scenarios. The use of numerical simulation alone is sufficient for accurate prediction of structural behaviour in areas where the deformation is limited. However, for crumple zones the validation programme shall include the verification of numerical models by appropriate tests (combined method).
The main steps for this combined method for a new design of structure are given below
— |
Step 1: Test of non-structural absorbing devices and crumple zones: Dynamic testing on full-size test specimens shall be carried out in order to assure performance of the crashworthy elements and give inputs for calibration. The test configuration shall be defined with respect to the following objectives:
|
— |
Step 2: Calibration of the numerical model of the structure: After carrying out the full size test described in step 1, the manufacturer shall calibrate the numerical model comparing the test results and the corresponding numerical simulation. The validation of the model shall use two essential phases within the comparison between test and numerical simulation:
|
— |
Step 3: Numerical simulation of the design collision scenarios: A 3-D model of each vehicle structure that will be subjected to permanent deformation shall be created. This model shall include the driver's cabin or vehicle end deforming structures, calibrated model from Step 2, and a complete 3D model of the rest of the carbody structure (Normally only the first or the first two vehicles models shall incorporate energy absorbing elements and deforming structure in detail. The remaining vehicles of the train can be represented as lumped mass/spring systems etc. representing their overall behaviour). If the carbodies are symmetric about the centre line, it is permissible to consider a half-model. Finally simulations of the whole design collision scenarios shall be carried out in order to have the vehicles approved against the requirements of this TSI. To validate behaviour at the point of impact, the complete train unit model shall contain the validated vehicle models from step 2 with the remaining vehicles in the train unit represented in a simplified form. It is permissible to use a reduced validation programme if modifications have been made to a previously verified design and if:
However, in this case the crashworthiness performance shall be validated to a level appropriate to the degree of change by:
|
A.4.2. Test specifications
For a dynamic test, the impact speed, the obstacle type, as well as its mass shall be chosen so that the energy absorbed by the test specimen is as a minimum equivalent to 50 % of the maximum energy to be dissipated in scenario 1 or 2 for the sum of all steps used in scenario 1 and 2.
All dedicated absorbers, which are designed to absorb energy in a controlled manner, shall be tested.
It is permissible to perform separate tests that do not include all the energy absorbing elements together, but all energy absorption steps that could interact shall be included in the same test. Elements such as the obstacle deflector, energy absorbing elements and the coupler etc are permitted to be considered in this way.
Similarly, for the individual testing of the inter-vehicle devices (couplers, anti-climbers and the devices for energy absorption), the effective speed and mass, shall be chosen so that the energy absorbed at the interface and the behaviour of elements constituting the interface are equivalent to those observed in these areas during the design collision scenarios.
In accordance with the crashworthiness test specification, the results of measurements: with the appropriate accuracy, carried out during the tests shall contain the following, records necessary for the calibration of the numerical model:
— |
The measurement of forces, record of the deformations, collision speed, decelerations for performance comparisons (energies, deformations etc) of the various energy absorption devices during this test and during the component tests. |
— |
The dimensional measurements before and after tests in the areas defined and agreed prior to the test. |
— |
Records of the test configuration, general views and detailed drawings using, where necessary, high-speed video allowing comparison of the kinematics of the test with the corresponding simulation. |
— |
The speed of impact and the mass of the vehicle |
A.4.3. Acceptance criteria for calibration
The correlation shall be validated using the following criteria:
— |
Consideration of the sequence of events occurring during the collision (scenarios include several phases of energy absorption). |
— |
The observed deformations during tests corresponding to those found in the analysis. |
— |
Level of energy dissipated by the model (according to the evolution of the total kinetic energy and the speed) with an acceptance of a difference less than 10 %. |
— |
Level of displacements (stroke) of the model with an acceptance of a difference less than 10 %. |
— |
Level of the overall force curve in the model with an acceptance of a difference less than 10 % for the mean values of the overall curve and the parts corresponding to each deformation step. |
A.5. Obstacle definitions
A.5.1. For collisions between a train and a wagon of 80 tons with side buffers:
The wagon of 80 tons shall be a unified freight wagon with bogies equipped with side buffers (as defined in The Conventional Rail Freight Wagon TSI) with a stroke of 105 mm. The definition of the obstacle (wagon) is defined in the following Figures:
A.5.2. For collisions between a train and a heavy obstacle at level crossing
A deformable equivalent numerical obstacle of 15 000 kg (as defined in the following figures) shall be used. This shall be simulated as a complete numerical model using specific crash software
For the definition of the stiffness of the obstacle, the values of the force curve (in function of the displacement) obtained against a sphere of 50 t with a diameter of 3 m at a speed of 30 m/s, shall be higher than the following curve:
With the following values for the definition of the curve:
Absolute displacement of the sphere (mm) |
Contact Force (kN) |
0 |
0 |
700 |
4 500 |
1 500 |
3 000 |
ANNEX B
Anthropometric data and forward visibility for train drivers
B.1. General
The dimensions for a driver's eye position are based on a driver's height range described below
B.2. Anthropometric data for drivers
Figure B.1.
Principal anthropometric measurements of the shortest and tallest driving staff
|
a |
a (1) |
b (1) |
c |
d |
e |
f (1) |
g (1) |
h |
i |
MIN |
1 600 |
1 630 |
1 530 |
840 |
740 |
555 |
530 |
425 |
120 |
440 |
MAX |
1 900 |
1 930 |
1 805 |
980 |
855 |
660 |
635 |
505 |
180 |
520 |
B.3. Signal position in relation to the driver's cab.
Figure B.2.
Signal Location
B.4. Reference Positions of Driver's Eyes
Figure B.3.
Desk with Shelf and Rigid Foot Rest
Figure B.4.
Desk with shelf and adjustable foot rest
Figure B.5.
Desk without Shelf and Rigid Foot Rest
(1) Measurement including footwear (30 mm)
ANNEX C
UK1 (issue2) Gauge
C.1. The UK1 (Issue 2) profiles
UK1 (issue 2) profiles
UK1 (Issue 2) has been defined using a number of methodologies appropriate to the British railway infrastructure, which allows maximum use of limited space.
The UK1 (Issue 2) gauge consists of 3 profiles, UK1[A], UK1[B], UK1[D].
Under this classification, [A] gauges are vehicle gauges with no reliance on infrastructure parameters, [B] gauges are vehicle gauges that contain limited (specific) vehicle suspension movement, but do not include overthrows, and [D] gauges are templates defining the maximum infrastructure space available on straight and level track.
Below 1 100 mm ARL, a fixed infrastructure gauge is defined in Railway Group Standard GC/RT5212 (Issue 1, February 2003), which provides an optimum limiting position for platforms and equipment designed to be in close proximity to the train. UK1[A] is a complementary vehicle gauge, which includes all necessary tolerances movements and a clearance to the infrastructure.
The vehicle shall not project beyond UK1[A], shown by the dashed profile.
Above 1 100 mm ARL, there are two profiles; the inner being UK1[B] (dotted profile) and the outer being UK1[D] (solid profile).
These profiles define a typical vehicle UK1[B] and the theoretical maximum size of a vehicle, UK1[D] that could be accommodated along the routes for which the gauge has been declared.
UK1[B] is defined according to a typical vehicle configuration that would be able to operate on all routes declared to be UK1 compliant. It should be noted that this vehicle has been designed using simple static gauging rules and would not make optimal use of the Network Rail controlled infrastructure.
UK1[D] defines the minimum static size of the Network Rail controlled infrastructure on the UK1 compliant routes as defined on 1st January 2004. It is not adjusted for track curvature. When applied using an approved methodology, and with the inclusion of clearances and tolerances defined by Railway Group Standard GC/RT5212 (Issue 1, February 2003), this profile defines the maximum available envelope on straight and level track. Additional space could be available locally to accommodate overthrow and dynamic movement related to curvature. As network improvements are implemented, more space than that shown above could become available.
Network data that can be used for vehicle design in accordance with an approved methodology is available from Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd.
UK1[D] can also be used to define a vehicle of any geometric dimensions and suspension configuration. This vehicle would, however, be smaller that UK1[B] since the modelling performed to develop UK1[B] considers the shape of the infrastructure adjusted for vehicle throws. Thus, on sections of curved track, there may be more infrastructure space available than is demonstrated by the UK1[D] profile. This explains why the UK1[B] profile exhibits a different shape to the UK1[D] profile.
In using the infrastructure information for developing vehicle shape, the space between UK1[B] and UK1[D] can be used to accommodate suspension movements, rather than restricting the gauge line.
It is important to note, and understand, the methodologies outlined above in order to develop the largest vehicles suitable for the British infrastructure.
C.2. Lower Sector UK1[A] Profile below 1 100 mm ARL
The hatched area bounded by points 17 to 20 is typically used for footsteps.
The hatched area bounded by points 4, 5 and 6 is available for wheels, lifeguards, etc. only.
Coordinates for UK1[A] Profile
Point |
X (mm) |
Y (mm) |
1 |
0 |
90 |
2 |
117 |
90 |
3 |
117 |
75 |
4 |
679,5 |
75 |
5 |
679,5 |
0 |
6 |
825,5 |
0 |
7 |
825,5 |
114 |
8 |
899 |
114 |
9 |
899 |
152,5 |
10 |
1 041,5 |
152,5 |
11 |
1 041,5 |
160 |
12 |
1 191 |
160 |
13 |
1 191 |
179 |
14 |
1 356 |
179 |
15 |
1 351 |
945 |
16 |
1 391 |
985 |
17 |
1 496 |
985 |
18 |
1 496 |
1 100 |
19 |
1 601 |
1 100 |
20 |
1 601 |
985 |
C.3. Upper Sector UK1[B] Profile above 1 100 mm ARL
Coordinates for UK1[B] profile
Point |
X (mm) |
Y (mm) |
1 |
0 |
3 890 |
2 |
405 |
3 890 |
3 |
1 100 |
3 600 |
4 |
1 422 |
3 100 |
5 |
1 422 |
1 138 |
6 |
1 392 |
1 100 |
C.4. Upper Sector UK1[D] Profile above 1 100 mm ARL
Coordinates for UK1[D] profile
Point |
X (mm) |
Y (mm) |
1 |
0 |
4 110 |
2 |
405 |
4 033 |
3 |
782 |
3 950 |
4 |
1 100 |
3 825 |
5 |
1 530 |
3 400 |
6 |
1 580 |
3 200 |
7 |
1 640 |
2 400 |
8 |
1 640 |
1 400 |
9 |
1 580 |
1 100 |
C.5. Application of UK1[A] Profile
The UK1[A] profile shall include all kinematic movements, wear and lateral and vertical throws.
Points 14 to 20 are permitted to be widened laterally on curves of less than 360 m radius according to the following formula:
dX = (26 000/R) – 72
where R is the curve radius in metres and dX is in mm.
Gauge vertical under-clearances shall not be infringed under any condition of loading and wear. Vertical suspension travel shall be considered to be to solid or bump stop condition.
Under the above loading and wear conditions, the vehicle shall not infringe the gauge under-clearance when on a concave or convex vertical curve of 500 m radius. Vertical curve overthrows shall be calculated using the formula for Ei and Eo in section 8 below (using K = 0).
C.6. Application of UK1[B] Profile
The 1 100 mm ARL dimension is an absolute minimum.
If the bogie centre distance is less than 17 m, no width reduction needs to be applied.
If the bogie centre distance is greater than 17 m, the lateral dimensions of the profile shall be reduced by the amount calculated using the formulae given in section 8. The values to be used are:
R |
= |
200 m |
K |
= |
0,181 m |
The UK1[B] profile includes an overall allowance for dynamic movements, vehicle tolerances and some geometric movements of 100 mm. This shall include:
|
Lateral, Vertical and Roll suspension movements |
|
Tolerances required by the vehicle builder |
|
Geometrical effect of vertical curvature |
Where the above effects exceed 100 mm, then an appropriate body dimension reduction shall be applied. Similarly, it is permissible to increase body dimensions if less than 100 mm is required to accommodate these effects.
C.7. Application of UK1[D] Profile
It is permissible for the vehicle to be built to the limits of the infrastructure envelope shown, subject to route assessment using an approved methodology and agreement with the infrastructure manager regarding clearance, tolerances and track fixity regimes appropriate to vehicle operation. Additional space for kinematic movement and curve overthrow could be available beyond the profile described, as described by the route database maintained by the Network Rail Ltd.
C.8. Calculation of Width Reduction
This section sets out the calculation for the gauge line reduction that shall be applied to accommodate the effects of overthrow on curves. The calculations are identical to, but expressed differently from, those given in the High Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006 for calculation of over-throw on curves. The same calculations can be used for calculating vertical reductions.
Where a vehicle is to be built to a vehicle gauge, the lateral dimensions defined by the gauge shall be reduced if the overall length or bogie centres exceed those specified in the gauge. Where reduced vehicle length or bogie centres are used, it is not permissible to increase the vehicle build profile.
In the following calculations, the variables are:
A |
= |
The wheelbase/bogie centres in metres |
Ni |
= |
The distance of the cross section being calculated from the bogie pivot/axle position (in metres) where this is inside of the wheelbase/bogie centres |
No |
= |
The distance of the cross section being calculated from the bogie pivot/axle position (in metres) where this is outside of the wheelbase/bogie centres |
R |
= |
The curve radius (in metres) at which the reduction is to be calculated |
K |
= |
The overthrow allowed at the defined radius (in metres) |
Ei |
= |
Inside the wheelbase/bogie centre Width Reduction (in metres) |
Eo |
= |
Outside the wheelbase/bogie centre Width Reduction (in metres) |
Formulae:
Ei = ((ANi – Ni2) / 2R)-K
Eo = ((ANo + No2) / 2 R)-K
Note: Ei and Eo are not permitted to be negative.
ANNEX D
Assessment of interoperability constituents
D.1. Scope
This annex indicates the assessment of conformity and suitability for use for interoperability constituents within the rolling stock subsystem.
D.2. Characteristics
The characteristics of the interoperability constituents to be assessed in the different phases of design, development and production are marked by X in Table D.1.
Table D.1.
Assessment of Interoperability Constituents of the rolling stock subsystem.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Interoperability constituents to be assessed |
Assessment in the following phase |
||||
Design and development phase |
Production phase |
||||
Design review and/or Design examination |
Review of manufacturing process |
Type test |
Verification of conformity to type |
||
4.2.2.2.2.1 |
Automatic centre buffer couplers |
X |
n.a. |
X |
X |
4.2.2.2.2.2 |
Buffing and draw gear components |
X |
n.a. |
X |
X |
4.2.2.2.2.3 |
Towing coupler for recovery and rescue |
X |
n.a. |
X |
X |
4.2.2.7 |
Driver's cab windscreen |
X |
n.a. |
X |
X |
4.2.3.4.9.2 |
Wheels |
X |
X |
X |
X |
4.2.7.4.2.5 |
Horns |
X |
n.a. |
X |
X |
4.2.8.3.7 |
Pantographs |
X |
n.a. |
X |
X |
4.2.8.3.8 |
Contact strips |
X |
n.a. |
X |
X |
4.2.9.3.2 |
Mobile discharge trolleys |
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
X |
4.2.9.5.2 |
Water filling adapters |
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
X |
Annex H clause H.2 |
Head lamps |
X |
n.a. |
X |
X |
Annex H clause H.2 |
Marker lamps |
X |
n.a. |
X |
X |
Annex H clause H.3 |
Tail lamps |
X |
n.a. |
X |
X |
Annex M VI |
Connections for toilet discharge system |
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
X |
ANNEX E
Assessment of the rolling stock subsystem
E.1. SCOPE
This annex indicates the assessment of conformity of the rolling stock subsystem
E.2. CHARACTERISTICS AND MODULES
The sub-system characteristics to be assessed in the different phases of design, development and production are marked by X in Table E.1. A cross in column 4 of Table E1 indicates that the relevant characteristics shall be verified by testing each single subsystem.
Table E.1.
Assessment of the rolling stock subsystem
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
Characteristics to be assessed |
Design and development phase |
Production phase |
|||
Design review and/or design examination |
Type Test |
Routine Test |
|||
4.2. Functional and technical specification of the domain |
|||||
4.2.1. General |
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
4.2.2. Structure and mechanical parts |
|||||
|
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a |
||
|
EC declaration of conformity and if applicable EC declaration of suitability for use |
||||
|
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a |
||
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
EC declaration of conformity |
||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
4.2.3. Track interaction and gauging |
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
X |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
X |
X |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
|||||
|
n.a. |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
Assessment of this clause is the responsibility of the Member State(s) where the rolling stock is operated. |
||||
|
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
EC declaration of conformity EC declaration of Suitability for Use |
||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
4.2.4. Braking |
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
4.2.5. Passenger information and communication |
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
X |
||
4.2.6. Environmental conditions |
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
4.2.7. System protection |
|||||
|
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
EC declaration of conformity |
||||
|
EC declaration of conformity |
||||
|
EC declaration of conformity |
||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
EC declaration of conformity |
||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
X |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
4.2.8. Traction and electrical equipment |
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
EC declaration of conformity |
||||
|
EC declaration of conformity |
||||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
X |
n.a. |
||
4.2.9. Servicing |
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
EC declaration of conformity |
||||
|
EC declaration of conformity |
||||
|
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
EC declaration of conformity |
||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
4.2.10. Maintenance |
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
|||||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
X |
n.a. |
n.a. |
(1) Type Test required at nominal frequency only
ANNEX F
Procedures for assessment of conformity and suitability for use
F.1. List of the modules
Modules for Interoperability Constituents:
— |
Module A: Internal production control |
— |
Module A1: Internal design control with product verification |
— |
Module B: Type examination |
— |
Module C: Conformity to type |
— |
Module D: Production quality management system |
— |
Module F: Product verification |
— |
Module H1: Full quality management system |
— |
Module H2: Full quality management system with design examination |
— |
Module V: Type validation by in service experience (Suitability for use) |
Modules for Subsystems
— |
Module SB: Type examination |
— |
Module SD: Product quality management system |
— |
Module SF: Product verification |
— |
Module SH2: Full quality management system with design examination |
Module for Maintenance Arrangements
— |
Module Conformity Assessment Procedure |
F.2. Modules for Interoperability Constituents
F.2.1. Module A: Internal production control
1. This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community, who carries out the obligations laid down in point 2, ensures and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned satisfies the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
2. The manufacturer shall establish the technical documentation described in point 3.
3. The technical documentation shall enable the conformity of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of the TSI to be assessed. It shall, as far as relevant for such assessment, cover the design, manufacture, maintenance and operation of the interoperability constituent. So far as relevant for the assessment, the documentation shall contain:
— |
a general description of the interoperability constituent |
— |
conceptual design and manufacturing information, for example drawings and schemes of components, subassemblies, circuits, etc. |
— |
descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design and manufacturing information, maintenance and the operation of the interoperability constituent |
— |
the technical specifications including European specifications (1) with relevant clauses, applied in full or in part, |
— |
description of the solutions adopted to meet the requirements of the TSI, where the European specifications have not been applied in full, |
— |
results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc, |
— |
test reports. |
4. The manufacturer shall take all the measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process ensures compliance of each manufactured interoperability constituent with the technical documentation referenced in point 3 and with the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
5. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall draw up a written declaration of conformity for the interoperability constituent. The content of this declaration has to include at least the information indicated in Annex IV (3) and in Article 13-3 of Directives 2001/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed.
The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and shall contain the following:
— |
the Directive references (Directives 2001/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability constituent may be subject), |
— |
the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community (give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the manufacturer or constructor), |
— |
description of interoperability constituent (make, type etc.) |
— |
description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity, |
— |
all the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular its conditions of use, |
— |
reference to this TSI and to any other applicable TSI, and where appropriate reference to European specifications, |
— |
identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his authorised representative established within the Community. |
6. The manufacturer or his authorised representative shall keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity with the technical documentation for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.
Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability constituent in the Community market.
7. If additional to the EC declaration of conformity, an EC declaration for suitability for use for the interoperability constituent is required by the TSI, this declaration has to be added after being issued by the manufacturer under the conditions of module V.
F.2.2. Module A1: Internal Design Control with Production Verification
1. This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community, who carries out the obligations laid down in point 2, ensures and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned satisfies the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
2. The manufacturer shall establish the technical documentation described in point 3.
3. The technical documentation shall enable the conformity of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of the TSI to be assessed.
The technical documentation shall also give evidence that the design of the interoperability constituent, already accepted before the implementation of the present TSI, is in accordance with the TSI and that the interoperability constituent has been used in service in the same area of use.
It shall, as far as relevant for such assessment, cover the design, manufacture, maintenance and operation of the interoperability constituent. So far as relevant for the assessment, the documentation shall contain:
— |
a general description of the interoperability constituent and its conditions of use, |
— |
conceptual design and manufacturing information, for example drawings and schemes of components, subassemblies, circuits, etc. |
— |
descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design and manufacturing information, maintenance and the operation of the interoperability constituent, |
— |
the technical specifications including European specifications (1) with relevant clauses, applied in full or in part, |
— |
descriptions of the solutions adopted to meet the requirements of the TSI, where the European specifications have not been applied in full, |
— |
results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc, |
— |
test reports, |
4. The manufacturer shall take all the measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process ensures compliance of each manufactured interoperability constituent with the technical documentation referenced in point 3 and with the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
The notified body, chosen by the manufacturer, shall carry out the appropriate examinations and tests in order to verify the conformity of the manufactured interoperability constituents with the type described in the technical documentation referenced in point 3 and with the requirement of the TSI. The manufacturer (2) can choose one of the following procedures:
Verification by examination and testing of every product
5.1.1. Each product shall be individually examined and appropriate tests shall be carried out in order to verify the product conformity with the type described in the technical documentation and the requirements of the TSI that apply to it. When a test is not set out in the TSI (or in an European Standard quoted in the TSI), the relevant European Specifications or equivalent tests are applicable
5.1.2. The notified body shall draw up a written certificate of conformity for the approved products relating to the tests carried out.
Statistical verification
5.2.1. The manufacturer shall present his products in the form of homogeneous lots and shall take all measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process ensures the homogeneity of each lot produced.
5.2.2. All interoperability constituents shall be available for verification in the form of homogeneous lots. A random sample shall be drawn from each lot. Each interoperability constituents in a sample shall be individually examined and appropriate tests shall be carried out to ensure the product conformity with the type described in the technical documentation and the requirements of the TSI that apply to it and to determine whether the lot is accepted or rejected. When a test is not set out in the TSI (or in an European Standard quoted in the TSI), the relevant European Specifications or equivalent tests are applicable
5.2.3. The statistical procedure shall use appropriate elements (statistical method, sampling plan etc), depending on the characteristics to be assessed, as specified in the TSI.
5.2.4. In the case of accepted lots, the notified body shall draw up a written certificate of conformity relating to the tests carried out. All interoperability constituents in the lot may be placed on the market except those interoperability constituents from the sample, which were found not to be in conformity.
5.2.5. If a lot is rejected, the notified body or the competent authority shall take appropriate measures to prevent placing that lot on the market. In the event of frequent rejection of lots the notified body shall suspend the statistical verification.
6. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall draw up the EC declaration of conformity of the interoperability constituent.
The content of this declaration shall include at least the information indicated in Annex IV (3) and in Article 13-3 of Directive 2001/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed.
The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and shall contain the following:
— |
the Directive references (Directives 2001/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability constituent may be subject), |
— |
the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community (give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the manufacturer or constructor), |
— |
description of interoperability constituent (make, type, etc) |
— |
description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity, |
— |
all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular any conditions of use, |
— |
name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of conformity and date of certificates together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificates, |
— |
reference to the TSI and any other applicable TSI and where appropriate reference to European specifications, |
— |
identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his authorised representative established within the Community. |
The certificate to be referred to is the certificate of conformity as mentioned in point 5. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall ensure that he is able to supply the notified body's certificates of conformity on request
7. The manufacturer or his authorised representative shall keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity with the technical documentation for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.
Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability constituent in the Community market.
8. If additional to the EC declaration of conformity, an EC declaration for suitability for use for the interoperability constituent is required by the TSI, this declaration has to be added after being issued by the manufacturer under the conditions of module V.
F.2.3. Module B: Type Examination
1. This module describes that part of the procedure by which a notified body ascertains and attests that a type, representative of the production envisaged, meets the provisions of the TSI that apply to it.
2. The application for the EC type-examination shall be lodged by the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community.
The application shall include:
— |
the name and address of the manufacturer and also, if the application is lodged by the authorised representative, his name and address, |
— |
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body, |
— |
the technical documentation, as described in point 3. |
The applicant shall place at the disposal of the notified body a specimen, representative of the production envisaged and hereinafter called “type”.
A type may cover several versions of the Interoperability Constituent provided that the differences between the versions do not affect the provisions of the TSI.
The notified body may request further specimens if needed for carrying out the test programme.
If no type tests are requested within the type examination procedure, and the type is sufficiently defined by the technical documentation, as described in point 3, the notified body shall agree that no specimens are placed at its disposal.
3. The technical documentation shall enable the conformity of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of the TSI to be assessed. It shall, as far as relevant for such assessment, cover the design, manufacture, maintenance and operation of the interoperability constituent.
The technical documentation shall contain:
— |
a general type-description, |
— |
conceptual design and manufacturing information, for example drawings, schemes of components, sub-assemblies, circuits, etc., |
— |
descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design and manufacturing information, maintenance and the operation of the interoperability constituent, |
— |
conditions of integration of the interoperability constituent in its system environment (sub-assembly, assembly, subsystem) and the necessary interface conditions, |
— |
conditions for use and maintenance of the interoperability constituent (restrictions of running time or distance, wear limits etc), |
— |
the technical specifications, including European specifications (1) with relevant clauses, applied in full or in part, |
— |
description of the solutions adopted to meet the requirements of the TSI in cases where the European specifications have not been applied in full, |
— |
results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc., |
— |
test reports, |
4. The notified body shall:
4.1. examine the technical documentation,
4.2. verify that any specimen(s) required for tests has (have) been manufactured in conformity with the technical documentation, and carry out or have carried out the type tests in accordance with the provisions of the TSI and/or the relevant European specifications,
4.3. where a design review is requested in the TSI, perform an examination of the design methods, the design tools and the design results to evaluate their capability to fulfil the requirements for conformity for the interoperability constituent at the completion of the design process,
4.4. where a review of the manufacturing process is requested in the TSI, perform an examination of the manufacturing process devised for manufacturing the interoperability constituent, to evaluate its contribution to product conformity, and/or examine the review carried out by the manufacturer at the completion of the design process,
4.5. identify the elements, which have been designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the TSI and the European specifications, as well as the elements, which have been designed without applying the relevant provisions of those European Specifications;
4.6. perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance with points 4.2., 4.3. and 4.4 to establish whether, where the manufacturer has chosen to apply the relevant European specifications, these have actually been applied;
4.7. perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance with points 4.2., 4.3. and 4.4. to establish whether, where the relevant European specifications have not been applied, the solutions adopted by the manufacturer meet the requirements of the TSI;
4.8. agree with the applicant the location where the examinations and necessary tests will be carried out.
5. Where the type meets the provisions of the TSI, the notified body shall issue a type-examination certificate to the applicant. The certificate shall contain the name and address of the manufacturer, conclusions of the examination, conditions for its validity and the necessary data for identification of the approved type.
The time period of validity shall be no longer than 5 years.
A list of the relevant parts of the technical documentation shall be annexed to the certificate and a copy kept by the notified body.
If the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community is denied a type-examination certificate, the notified body shall provide detailed reasons for such denial.
Provision shall be made for an appeals procedure.
6. The applicant shall inform the notified body that holds the technical documentation concerning the type-examination certificate of all modifications to the approved product which may affect the conformity with the requirements of the TSI or the prescribed conditions for use of the product. In such cases the interoperability constituent shall receive additional approval from the notified body that issued the EC type examination certificate. In this case, the notified body shall perform only those examinations and tests that are relevant and necessary to the changes. The additional approval shall be given either in the form of an addition to the original type-examination certificate, or, by the issue of a new certificate after withdrawal of the old one.
7. If no modifications as in point 6 have been made, the validity of an expiring certificate can be extended for another period of validity. The applicant will apply for such a prolongation by a written confirmation that no such modifications have been made, and the notified body issues a prolongation for another period of validity as in point 5, if no contrary information exists. This procedure can be reiterated.
8. Each notified body shall communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the type-examination certificates and additions issued, withdrawn or refused.
9. The other notified bodies shall receive, on request, copies of the type-examination certificates issued and/or their additions. The annexes to the certificates (see § 5) shall be kept at the disposal of the other notified bodies.
10. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep with the technical documentation copies of type-examination certificates and their additions for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured. Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability constituent on the Community market.
F.2.4. Module C: Conformity to Type
1. This module describes that part of the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community ensures and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned is in conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and satisfies the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
2. The manufacturer shall take all measures necessary to ensure that the manufacturing process ensures compliance of each manufactured interoperability constituent with the type as described in the EC type examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
3. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall draw up an EC declaration of conformity for the interoperability constituent.
The content of this declaration has to include at least the information indicated in Annex IV (3) and in Article 13-3 of Directive 2001/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed.
The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and shall contain the following:
— |
the Directive references (Directive 2001/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability constituent may be subject), |
— |
the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community (give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the manufacturer or constructor), |
— |
description of interoperability constituent (make, type etc.) |
— |
description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity, |
— |
all the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular its conditions of use, |
— |
name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of type examination conformity and date of the EC type examination certificate (and its additions) together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificate, |
— |
reference to the TSI and to any other applicable TSI, and where appropriate reference to European specifications (1), |
— |
identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his authorised representative established within the Community. |
— |
The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured. |
— |
Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability constituent on the Community market. |
— |
If additional to the EC declaration of conformity an EC declaration of suitability for use for the interoperability constituent is required by the TSI, this declaration has to be added after being issued by the manufacturer under the conditions of module V. |
F.2.5. Module D: Production Quality Management System
1. This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community who satisfies the obligations of point 2 ensures and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned is in conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and satisfies the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
2. The manufacturer shall operate an approved quality management system for production, final product inspection and testing as specified in point 3 and is subject to monitoring as specified in point. 4.
Quality management system
3.1. The manufacturer shall lodge an application for assessment of his quality management system with a notified body of his choice, for the interoperability constituents concerned.
The application shall include:
— |
all relevant information for the product category representative for the interoperability constituents envisaged, |
— |
the documentation concerning the quality management system, |
— |
the technical documentation of the approved type and a copy of the type-examination certificate, issued after the completion of the type examination procedure of module B. |
— |
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body, |
3.2. The quality management system shall ensure compliance of the interoperability constituents with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI that apply to them. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. The quality management system documentation shall permit a consistent interpretation of the quality programmes, plan, manuals and records.
It shall contain in particular an adequate description of:
— |
the quality objectives and the organisational structure, |
— |
responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to product quality, |
— |
the manufacturing, quality control and quality management techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used, |
— |
the examinations, checks and tests that will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, and the frequency with which they will be undertaken, |
— |
the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc., |
— |
the means to monitor the achievement of the required product quality and the effective operation of the quality management system. |
3.3. The notified body assesses the quality management system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements of point 3.2. It presumes compliance with these requirements if the manufacturer implements a quality system for production, final product inspection and testing in respect of the Standard EN/ISO 9001-2000, which take into consideration the specificity of the interoperability constituent for which it is implemented.
When the manufacturer operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the assessment.
The audit shall be specific for the product category, which is representative for the interoperability constituent. The auditing team shall have at least one member experienced as an assessor in the product technology concerned. The evaluation procedure shall include an inspection visit to the manufacturer's premises.
The decision shall be notified to the manufacturer. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.
3.4. The manufacturer shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality management system as approved and to uphold it so that it remains adequate and efficient.
The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep the notified body that has approved the quality management system informed of any intended updating of the quality management system.
The notified body shall evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management system will still satisfy the requirements of point 3.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.
It shall notify its decision to the manufacturer. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.
Surveillance of the quality management system under the responsibility of the notified body.
4.1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality management system.
4.2. The manufacturer shall allow the notified body entrance for inspection purposes to the locations of manufacture, inspection and testing, and storage and shall provide it with all necessary information, in particular:
— |
the quality management system documentation, |
— |
the quality records such as inspection reports and tests data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc. |
4.3. The notified body shall periodically carry out audits to make sure that the manufacturer maintains and applies the quality management system and shall provide an audit report to the manufacturer.
The frequency of the audits shall be at least once a year.
When the manufacturer operate a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the surveillance.
4.4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the manufacturer. During such visits the notified body may carry out, or cause to be carried out, tests to verify that the quality management system is functioning correctly, if necessary. The notified body shall provide the manufacturer with a visit report and, if a test has taken place, with a test report.
5. Each notified body shall communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the quality management system approvals, issued, withdrawn or refused.
The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of the quality management system approvals issued.
6. The manufacturer shall, for a period of 10 years after the last product has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of the national authorities:
— |
the documentation referenced to in the second indent of point 3.1, |
— |
the updating referenced to in the second paragraph of point 3.4, |
the decisions and reports from the notified body in the final paragraph of points 3.4, 4.3 and 4.4.
7. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall draw up the EC declaration of conformity of the interoperability constituent.
The content of this declaration shall include at least the information indicated in Annex IV (3) and in Article 13-3 of Directive 2001/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed.
The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and shall contain the following:
— |
the Directive references (Directive 2001/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability constituent may be subject), |
— |
the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community (give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the manufacturer or constructor), |
— |
description of the interoperability constituent (make, type, etc) |
— |
description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity, |
— |
all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular any conditions of use, |
— |
name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of conformity and date of certificates together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificates, |
— |
reference to the TSI and any other applicable TSI and where appropriate reference to European specification (1), |
— |
identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his authorised representative established within the Community. |
The certificates to be referred to are:
— |
the quality management system approval indicated in point 3, |
— |
the type-examination certificate and its additions, |
8. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.
Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability constituent on the Community market.
9. If additional to the EC declaration of conformity an EC declaration of suitability for use for the interoperability constituent is requested in the TSI, this declaration has to be added, after being issued by the manufacturer under the conditions of Module V.
F.2.6. Module F: Product Verification
1. This module describes the procedure whereby a manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community checks and attests that the interoperability constituent concerned and subject to the provisions of point 3 is in conformity with the type as described in the EC type examination certificate and satisfies the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
2. The manufacturer shall take all measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process ensures conformity of each interoperability constituent with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
3. The notified body shall carry out the appropriate examinations and tests in order to check the conformity of the interoperability constituent with the type as described in the EC type examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI. The manufacturer (3) can choose either an examination and testing of every interoperability constituent as specified in point 4 or an examination and testing of interoperability constituents on a statistical basis, as specified in point 5.
Verification by examination and testing of every interoperability constituent
4.1. Each product shall be individually examined and appropriate tests shall be carried out in order to verify the product conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI that apply to it. When a test is not set out in the TSI, (or in an European Standard quoted in the TSI), the relevant European Specifications (1), or equivalent tests are applicable.
4.2. The notified body shall draw up a written certificate of conformity for the approved products relating to the tests carried out.
4.3. The manufacturer or his authorised representative shall ensure that he is able to supply the notified body's certificates of conformity on request.
Statistical verification
5.1. The manufacturer shall present his interoperability constituents in the form of homogeneous lots and shall take all measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process ensures the homogeneity of each lot produced.
5.2. All interoperability constituents shall be available for verification in the form of homogeneous lots. A random sample shall be drawn from each lot. Each interoperability constituents in a sample shall be individually examined and appropriate tests shall be carried out to ensure the product conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI which apply to it and to determine whether the lot is accepted or rejected. When a test is not set out in the TSI (or in an European Standard quoted in the TSI), the relevant European Specifications or equivalent tests are applicable..
5.3. The statistical procedure shall use appropriate elements (statistical method, sampling plan etc), depending on the characteristics to be assessed, as specified in the TSI.
5.4. In the case of accepted lots, the notified body shall draw up a written certificate of conformity relating to the tests carried out. All interoperability constituents in the lot may be placed on the market except those interoperability constituents from the sample, which were found not to be in conformity.
If a lot is rejected, the notified body or the competent authority shall take appropriate measures to prevent placing of that lot on the market. In the event of frequent rejection of lots the notified body shall suspend the statistical verification.
5.5. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall ensure that he is able to supply the notified body's certificates of conformity on request.
6. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall draw up the EC declaration of conformity of the interoperability constituent.
The content of this declaration shall include at least the information indicated in Annex IV (3) and in Article 13-3 of Directive 2001/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed.
The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and shall contain the following:
— |
the Directive references (Directive 2001/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability constituent may be subject), |
— |
the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community (give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the manufacturer or constructor), |
— |
description of interoperability constituent (make, type, etc) |
— |
description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity, |
— |
all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular any conditions of use, |
— |
name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of conformity and date of certificates together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificates, |
— |
reference to the TSI and any other applicable TSI and where appropriate reference to European specifications, |
— |
identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his authorised representative established within the Community. |
The certificates to be referred to are:
— |
the type-examination certificate and its additions, |
— |
the certificate of conformity as mentioned in points 4 or 5. |
7. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.
Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability constituent on the Community market.
8. If additional to the EC declaration of conformity an EC declaration of suitability for use for the interoperability constituent is requested in the TSI, this declaration has to be added, after being issued by the manufacturer under the conditions of Module V.
F.2.7. Module H1: Full Quality Management System
1. This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community who satisfies the obligations of point 2, ensures and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned satisfies the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
2. The manufacturer shall operate an approved quality management system for design, production and final product inspection and testing as specified in point 3 and shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 4.
Quality management system
3.1. The manufacturer shall lodge an application for assessment of his quality management system with a notified body of his choice, for the interoperability constituents concerned.
The application shall include:
— |
all relevant information for the product category representative for the interoperability constituent envisaged, |
— |
the quality management system’s documentation. |
— |
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body, |
3.2. The quality management system shall ensure compliance of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of the TSI that apply to it. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. This quality management system documentation shall ensure a common understanding of the quality policies and procedures such as quality programmes, plans, manuals and records.
It shall contain in particular an adequate description of:
— |
the quality objectives and the organisational structure, |
— |
responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to design and product quality, |
— |
the technical design specifications, including European specifications (1), that will be applied, and, where the European specifications will not be applied in full, the means that will be used to ensure that the requirements of the TSI that apply to the interoperability constituent will be met, |
— |
the design control and design verification techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used when designing the interoperability constituents pertaining to the product category covered, |
— |
the corresponding manufacturing, quality control and quality management system techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used, |
— |
the examinations, checks and tests that will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, and the frequency with which they will be undertaken, |
— |
the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc., |
— |
the means to monitor the achievement of the required design and product quality and the effective operation of the quality management system. |
The quality policies and procedures shall cover in particular the assessment phases as design review, review of manufacturing process and type tests, as they are specified in the TSI, for the different characteristics and performances of the interoperability constituent.
3.3. The notified body shall assess the quality management system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements of point 3.2. It presumes compliance with these requirements if the manufacturer implements a quality system for design, production, final product inspection and testing in respect of the Standard EN/ISO 9001-2000, which take into consideration the specificity of the interoperability constituent for which it is implemented.
When the manufacturer operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the assessment.
The audit shall be specific for the product category, which is representative for the interoperability constituent. The auditing team shall have at least one member experienced as an assessor in the product technology concerned. The evaluation procedure shall include an assessment visit to the manufacturer's premises.
The decision shall be notified to the manufacturer. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.
3.4. The manufacturer shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality management system as approved and to uphold it so that it remains adequate and efficient.
The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep the notified body that has approved the quality management system informed of any intended updating of the quality management system.
The notified body shall evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management system will still satisfy the requirements of point 3.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.
It shall notify its decision to the manufacturer. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the evaluation and the reasoned assessment decision.
Surveillance of the quality management system under the responsibility of the notified body
4.1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality management system.
4.2. The manufacturer shall allow the notified body entrance for inspection purposes to the locations of design, manufacture, inspection and testing, and storage, and shall provide it with all necessary information, including particular:
— |
the quality management system documentation, |
— |
the quality records as foreseen by the design part of the quality management system, such as results of analyses, calculations, tests, etc., |
— |
the quality records as foreseen by the manufacturing part of the quality management system, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc. |
4.3. The notified body shall periodically carry out audits to make sure that the manufacturer maintains and applies the quality management system and shall provide an audit report to the manufacturer. When the manufacturer operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the surveillance.
The frequency of the audits shall be at least once a year.
4.4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the manufacturer. At the time of such visits, the notified body may carry out tests or have them carried out in order to check the proper functioning of the quality management system where necessary. It shall provide the manufacturer with a visit report and, if a test has been carried out, with a test report.
5. The manufacturer shall, for a period of 10 years after the last product has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of the national authorities:
— |
the documentation referenced to in the second indent of the second subparagraph of point 3.1, |
— |
the updating referenced in the second subparagraph of point 3.4, |
— |
the decisions and reports from the notified body in the final subparagraph of points 3.4, 4.3 and 4.4. |
6. Each notified body shall communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the quality management system approvals issued, withdrawn or refused.
The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of the quality management system approvals and additional approvals issued.
7. The manufacturer or its authorised representative established within the Community shall draw up the EC Declaration of conformity of the interoperability constituent.
The content of this declaration shall include at least the information indicated in Annex IV (3) and in Article 13-3 of Directive 2001/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed.
The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and shall contain the following:
— |
the Directive references (Directive 2001/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability constituent may be subject) |
— |
the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community (give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the manufacturer or constructor), |
— |
description of interoperability constituent (make, type, etc) |
— |
description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity, |
— |
all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular its conditions of use, |
— |
name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of conformity, and date of certificate together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificate, |
— |
reference to the TSI and to any other applicable TSI and where appropriate to European specifications, |
— |
identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his authorised representative established within the Community. |
The certificate to be referred to is:
— |
the Quality management system approvals indicated in point 3. |
8. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.
Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability constituent on the Community market.
9. If additional to the EC declaration of conformity an EC declaration of suitability for use for the interoperability constituent is requested in the TSI, this declaration has to be added, after being issued by the manufacturer under the conditions of Module V.
F.2.8. Module H2: Full Quality Management System With Design Examination
1. This module describes the procedure whereby a notified body carries out an examination of the design of an interoperability constituent and the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community who satisfies the obligations of point 2 ensures and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned satisfies the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
2. The manufacturer shall operate an approved quality management system for design, production and final product inspection and testing as specified in point 3 and shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point. 4.
Quality management system.
3.1. The manufacturer shall lodge an application for assessment of his quality management system with a notified body of his choice, for the interoperability constituents concerned.
The application shall include:
— |
all relevant information for the product category representative for the interoperability constituent envisaged, |
— |
the quality management system’s documentation. |
— |
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body, |
3.2. The quality management system shall ensure compliance of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of the TSI that apply to it. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. This quality management system documentation shall ensure a common understanding of the quality policies and procedures such as quality programmes, plans, manuals and records.
It shall contain in particular an adequate description of:
— |
the quality objectives and the organisational structure, |
— |
responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to design and product quality, |
— |
the technical design specifications, including European specifications (1), that will be applied, and, where the European specifications will not be applied in full, the means that will be used to ensure that the requirements of the TSI that apply to the interoperability constituent will be met, |
— |
the design control and design verification techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used when designing the interoperability constituents pertaining to the product category covered, |
— |
the corresponding manufacturing, quality control and quality management system techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used, |
— |
the examinations, checks and tests that will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, and the frequency with which they will be undertaken, |
— |
the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc., |
— |
the means to monitor the achievement of the required design and product quality and the effective operation of the quality management system. |
The quality policies and procedures shall cover in particular the assessment phases, such as design review, review of manufacturing processes and type tests, as they are specified in the TSI, for different characteristics and performances of the interoperability constituent.
3.3. The notified body shall assess the quality management system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements of point 3.2. It presumes compliance with these requirements if the manufacturer implements a quality system for design, production, final product inspection and testing in respect of the Standard EN/ISO 9001-2000, which takes into consideration the specificity of the interoperability constituent for which it is implemented.
When the manufacturer operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the assessment.
The audit shall be specific for the product category, which is representative for the interoperability constituent. The auditing team shall have at least one member experienced as an assessor in the product technology concerned. The evaluation procedure shall include an assessment visit to the manufacturer's premises.
The decision shall be notified to the manufacturer. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the audit and the reasoned assessment decision.
3.4. The manufacturer shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality management system as approved and to uphold it so that it remains adequate and efficient.
The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep the notified body that has approved the quality management system informed of any intended updating of the quality management system.
The notified body shall evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management system will still satisfy the requirements of point 3.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.
It shall notify its decision to the manufacturer. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the evaluation and the reasoned assessment decision.
Surveillance of the quality management system under the responsibility of the notified body
4.1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality management system.
4.2. The manufacturer shall allow the notified body entrance for inspection purposes to the locations of design, manufacture, inspection and testing, and storage, and shall provide it with all necessary information, including:
— |
the quality management system documentation, |
— |
the quality records as foreseen by the design part of the quality management system, such as results of analyses, calculations, tests, etc., |
— |
the quality records as foreseen by the manufacturing part of the quality management system, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc. |
4.3. The notified body shall periodically carry out audits to make sure that the manufacturer maintains and applies the quality management system and shall provide an audit report to the manufacturer. When the manufacturer operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the surveillance.
The frequency of the audits shall be at least once a year.
4.4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the manufacturer. At the time of such visits, the notified body may carry out tests or have them carried out in order to check the proper functioning of the quality management system where necessary. It shall provide the manufacturer with a visit report and, if a test has been carried out, with a test report.
5. The manufacturer shall, for a period of 10 years after the last product has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of the national authorities:
— |
the documentation referenced in the second indent of the second subparagraph of point 3.1, |
— |
the updating referenced to in the second subparagraph of point 3.4, |
— |
the decisions and reports from the notified body in the final subparagraph of points 3.4, 4.3 and 4.4. |
Design examination
6.1. The manufacturer shall lodge an application for examination of the design of the interoperability constituent with a notified body of his choice
6.2. The application shall enable the design, manufacture, maintenance and operation of the interoperability constituent to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the requirements of the TSI to be assessed.
It shall include:
— |
a general type-description, |
— |
the technical design specifications, including European specifications, with relevant clauses, that have been applied in full or in part, |
— |
any necessary supporting evidence for their adequacy, in particular where the European specifications and the relevant clauses have not been applied, |
— |
the test programme |
— |
conditions for integration of the interoperability constituent in its system environment (sub-assembly, assembly, subsystem) and the necessary interface conditions, |
— |
conditions for use and maintenance of the interoperability constituent (restrictions of running time or distance, wear limits etc), |
— |
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body, |
6.3. The applicant shall present the results of tests (4), including type tests when required, carried out by its appropriate laboratory or on their behalf.
6.4. The notified body shall examine the application and assess the results of the tests. Where the design meets the provisions of the TSI that apply to it, the notified body shall issue an EC design examination certificate to the applicant. The certificate shall contain the conclusions of the examination, conditions for its validity, the necessary data for identification of the approved design and, if relevant, a description of the product’s functioning.
The time period of validity shall be no longer than 5 years.
6.5. The applicant shall keep the notified body that has issued the EC design examination certificate informed of all modifications to the approved design, which may affect the conformity with the requirements of the TSI or the prescribed conditions for use of the interoperability constituent. In such cases the interoperability constituent shall receive additional approval from the notified body that issued the EC design examination certificate. In this case, the notified body shall perform only those examinations and tests that are relevant and necessary to the changes. The additional approval shall be given in the form of an addition to the original EC design examination certificate.
6.6. If no modifications as in point 6.4. have been made, the validity of an expiring certificate can be extended for another period of validity. The applicant will apply for such a prolongation by a written confirmation that no such modifications have been made, and the notified body issues a prolongation for another period of validity as in point 6.3. if no contrary information exists. This procedure can be reiterated.
7. Each notified body shall communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the quality management system approvals and the EC design examination certificates, which it has issued, withdrawn or refused.
The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of:
— |
the quality management system approvals and additional approvals issued and |
— |
the EC design examination certificates and additions issued. |
8. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall draw up the EC declaration of conformity of the interoperability constituent.
The content of this declaration shall include at least the information indicated in Annex IV (3) and in Article 13-3 of Directive 2001/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and its accompanying documents shall be dated and signed.
The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and shall contain the following:
— |
the Directive references (Directive 2001/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability constituent may be subject), |
— |
the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community (give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the manufacturer or constructor), |
— |
description of interoperability constituent (make, type, etc) |
— |
description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity, |
— |
all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular any conditions of use, |
— |
name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of conformity and date of certificates together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificates, |
— |
reference to the TSI and any other applicable TSI and where appropriate to European specifications, |
— |
identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his authorised representative established within the Community. |
The certificates to be referred to are:
— |
the quality management system approval and surveillance reports indicated in point 3 and 4, |
— |
the EC design examination certificate and its additions. |
9. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.
Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability constituent on the Community market.
10. If additional to the EC declaration of conformity an EC declaration of suitability for use for the interoperability constituent is requested in the TSI, this declaration has to be added, after being issued by the manufacturer under the conditions of Module V.
F.2.9. Module V: Type-Validation By In Service Experience (Suitability For Use)
1. This module describes that part of the procedure by which a notified body ascertains and attests that a specimen, representative of the production envisaged, meets the provisions of the TSI that apply to it for suitability for use, by type validation as demonstrated through in service experience (5).
2. The manufacturer, or his authorised representative established within the Community, shall lodge the application for the type-validation by in service experience with a notified body of his choice.
The application shall include:
— |
the name and address of the manufacturer and also, if the application is lodged by the authorised representative, his name and address, |
— |
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body, |
— |
the technical documentation, as described in point 3, |
— |
the programme for validation by in service experience, as described in point 4, |
— |
the name and address of the company(ies) (infrastructure managers and/or railway enterprises), with which the applicant has obtained an agreement to contribute to a suitability for use assessment by in service experience |
— |
by operating the interoperability constituent in service, |
— |
by monitoring the in service behaviour and |
— |
by issuing a report about in service experience, |
— |
the name and the address of the company undertaking the maintenance of the interoperability constituent during the time period or running distance required for in service experience, |
— |
an EC declaration of conformity for the interoperability constituent and, |
— |
if module B is required in the TSI, an EC type examination certificate, |
— |
if module H2 is required in the TSI, an EC design examination certificate. |
The applicant shall place at the disposal of the company(ies), undertaking the operation of the interoperability constituent in service a specimen or a sufficient number of specimens, representative of the production envisaged and hereinafter called “type”. A type may cover several versions of the interoperability constituent provided that the differences between the versions are all covered by EC declarations of conformity and certificates as mentioned above.
The notified body may request further specimens if needed for carrying out the validation by in service experience to be put in service.
3. The technical documentation shall enable the assessment of the product with the requirements of the TSI. The documentation shall cover the operation of the interoperability constituent, and, as far as relevant for such assessment, cover also the design, manufacture and maintenance.
The technical documentation shall contain
— |
a general type-description, |
— |
the technical specification, against which the performance and in service behaviour of the interoperability constituent is to be assessed (relevant TSI and/or European Specifications with relevant clauses), |
— |
conditions of integration of the interoperability constituent in its system environment (sub-assembly, assembly, subsystem) and the necessary interface conditions, |
— |
conditions for use and maintenance of the interoperability constituent (restrictions of running time or distance, wear limits etc), |
— |
descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design, manufacture and operation of the interoperability constituent; |
and, as far as is relevant for assessment,
— |
conceptual design and manufacturing drawings, |
— |
results of design calculations made and examinations carried out, |
— |
test reports. |
If the TSI requires further information for the technical documentation, this shall be included.
A list of the European specifications referenced to in the technical documentation, applied in full or in part, shall be attached.
4. The programme for the validation by in service experience shall include:
— |
the required performance or behaviour in service of the interoperability constituent under trial, |
— |
the installation arrangements, |
— |
the duration of the programme — either time or distance - |
— |
the operating conditions and the service programme expected, |
— |
the maintenance programme, |
— |
the special in service tests, if any, to be performed, |
— |
the batch size of the specimens — if more than one, |
— |
the inspection programme (nature, number and frequency of inspections, documentation), |
— |
criteria for tolerable defects and their impact on the programme, |
— |
the information to be included in the report of the company operating the interoperability constituent in service (see point 2). |
The notified body shall:
5.1. Examine the technical documentation and the programme for validation by in service experience,
5.2. Verify that the type is representative and has been manufactured in conformity with the technical documentation,
5.3. Verify that the programme for validation by in service experience is well adapted to assess the required performance and in service behaviour of the interoperability constituent,
5.4. Agree with the applicant the programme and the location where the inspections and necessary tests will be carried out and the body performing the tests (notified body or other competent laboratory),
5.5. Monitor and inspect the progress of in service running, operation and maintenance of the interoperability constituent,
5.6. Evaluate the report, to be issued by the company (ies) (infrastructure managers and/or railway enterprises) operating the interoperability constituent, and all other documentation and information, gained during the procedure (test reports, maintenance experience etc),
5.7. Assess, if the in service behaviour meets the requirements of the TSI.
6. Where the type meets the provisions of the TSI, the notified body shall issue a suitability for use certificate to the applicant. The certificate shall contain the name and address of the manufacturer, conclusions of the validation, conditions for its validity and the necessary data for identification of the approved type.
The time period of validity shall be no longer than 5 years.
A list of the relevant parts of the technical documentation shall be annexed to the certificate and a copy kept by the notified body.
If the applicant is denied a suitability for use certificate, the notified body shall provide detailed reasons for such denial.
Provision shall be made for an appeals procedure.
7. The applicant shall inform the notified body that holds the technical documentation concerning the suitability for use certificate of all modifications to the approved product which shall receive additional approval where such changes may affect the suitability for use or the prescribed conditions for use of the product. In this case, the notified body shall perform only those examinations and tests, that are relevant and necessary to the changes. The additional approval may be given in the form of an addition to the original suitability for use certificate, or by issue of a new certificate issued after withdrawal of the old certificate.
8. If no modifications as in point 7 have been made, the validity of an expiring certificate can be extended for another period of validity. The applicant will apply for such a prolongation by a written confirmation that no such modifications have been made, and the notified body issues a prolongation for another period of validity as in point 6, if no contrary information exists. This procedure can be reiterated.
9. Each notified body shall communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the suitability for use certificates issued, withdrawn or refused.
10. The other notified bodies shall be provided on request with copies of the suitability for use certificates issued and/or their additions. The annexes to the certificates shall be kept at the disposal of the other notified bodies.
11. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall draw up the EC declaration of suitability for use of the interoperability constituent.
The content of this declaration shall include at least the information, indicated in Annex IV (3) and in Article 13-3 of Directive 2001/16/EC. The EC declaration of suitability for use and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed.
The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and shall contain the following:
— |
the Directive references (Directive 2001/16/EC), |
— |
the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community (give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the manufacturer or constructor), |
— |
description of interoperability constituent (make, type, etc) |
— |
all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular any conditions of use, |
— |
name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of suitability for use and date of suitability for use certificate together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificate, |
— |
reference to this TSI and to any other applicable TSI, and where appropriate reference to European specification, |
— |
identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his authorised representative established within the Community. |
12. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep a copy of the EC declaration of suitability for use for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.
Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability constituent on the Community market.
F.3. Modules for the EC Verification of Subsystems
Note: in this section F.3, subsystem means rolling stock subsystem or, where relevant, energy subsystem.
F.3.1. Module SB: Type Examination
1. This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies at the request of an contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the Community, that a type of a subsystem, representative of the production envisaged,
— |
complies with this TSI and any other applicable TSI, which demonstrate that the essential requirements (6) of Directive 01/16/EChave been met |
— |
complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty. |
The type examination defined by this module could include specific assessment phases — design review, type test or review of manufacturing process, which are specified in the relevant TSI.
2. The contracting entity (7) shall lodge an application for EC verification (through type examination) of the subsystem with a notified body of his choice.
The application shall include:
— |
name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative |
— |
the technical documentation, as described in point 3. |
3. The applicant shall place at the disposal of the notified body a specimen of the subsystem (8), representative of the production envisaged and hereinafter called “type”.
A type may cover several versions of the subsystem provided that the differences between the versions do not affect the provisions of the TSI.
The notified body may request further specimens if needed for carrying out the test programme.
If so required for specific test or examination methods and specified in the TSI or in the European specification (1) referenced to in the TSI, a specimen or specimens of a subassembly or assembly or a specimen of the subsystem in a pre-assembled condition shall to be provided.
The technical documentation and specimen(s) shall enable the design, manufacture, installation, maintenance and operation of the subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the provisions of the TSI to be assessed.
The technical documentation shall include:
— |
a general description of the subsystem, overall design and structure, |
— |
the rolling stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI |
— |
conceptual design and manufacturing information, for example drawings, schemes of components, subassemblies, assemblies, circuits, etc., |
— |
descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design and manufacturing information, the maintenance and the operation of the subsystem, |
— |
the technical specifications, including European specifications, that have been applied, |
— |
any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the above specifications, in particular where European specifications and the relevant clauses have not been applied in full, |
— |
a list of the interoperability constituents to be incorporated into the subsystem, |
— |
copies of the EC declarations of conformity or suitability for use of interoperability constituents and all the necessary elements defined in annex VI of the directives, |
— |
evidence of conformity with the other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates) |
— |
technical documentation regarding the manufacture and the assembly of the subsystem, |
— |
a list of manufacturers, involved in the subsystem’s design, manufacturing, assembly and installation, |
— |
conditions for use of the subsystem (restrictions of running time or distance, wear limits etc), |
— |
conditions for maintenance and technical documentation regarding the maintenance of the subsystem |
— |
any technical requirement that shall be taken into account during production, maintenance or operation of the subsystem |
— |
results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc., |
— |
test reports. |
If the TSI requires further information for the technical documentation, this shall be included.
The notified body shall:
4.1. Examine the technical documentation,
4.2. Verify that the specimen(s) of the subsystem or of assemblies or subassemblies of the subsystem, has (have) been manufactured in conformity with the technical documentation, and carry out or have carried out the type tests in accordance with the provisions of the TSI and the appropriate European specifications. Such manufacture shall be verified using an appropriate assessment module.
4.3. Where a design review is requested in the TSI, perform an examination of the design methods, the design tools and the design results to evaluate their capability to fulfil the requirements for conformity for the subsystem at the completion of the design process
4.4. Identify the elements which have been designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the TSI and the European specifications as well as the elements which have been designed without applying the relevant provisions of those European specifications;
4.5. Perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance with points 4.2. and 4.3 to establish where the relevant European specifications have been chosen, these have actually been applied;
4.6. Perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance with point 4.2. and 4.3. to establish whether the solutions adopted meet the requirements of the TSI when the appropriate European specifications have not been applied.
4.7. Agree with the applicant the location where the examinations and necessary tests will be carried out.
5. Where the type meets the provisions of the TSI, the notified body shall issue a type-examination certificate to the applicant. The certificate shall contain the name and address of the contracting entity and the manufacturer(s) indicated in the technical documentation, conclusions of the examination, conditions for its validity and the necessary data for identification of the approved type.
A list of the relevant parts of the technical documentation shall be annexed to the certificate and a copy kept by the notified body.
If the contracting entity is denied a type-examination certificate, the notified body shall provide detailed reasons for such denial.
Provision shall be made for an appeals procedure.
6. Each notified body shall communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the type-examination certificates issued, withdrawn or refused
7. The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of the type-examination certificates issued and/or their additions. The annexes to the certificates shall be kept at the disposal of the other notified bodies.
8. The contracting entity shall keep with the technical documentation copies of type-examination certificates and any additions throughout the service life of the subsystem. It shall be sent to any Member State which so requests.
9. During the production phase, the applicant shall inform the notified body that holds the technical documentation concerning the type-examination certificate of all modifications which may affect the conformity with the requirements of the TSI or the prescribed conditions for use of the subsystem. The subsystem shall receive additional approval in such cases. In this case, the notified body shall perform only those examinations and tests, those are relevant and necessary to the changes. This additional approval may be given either in the form of an addition to the original type-examination certificate, or by issue of a new certificate after withdrawal of the old certificate.
F.3.2. Module SD: Production Quality Management System
1. This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies, at the request of an contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the Community, that a subsystem, for which already a type-examination certificate has been issued by a notified body,
— |
complies with this TSI and any other applicable TSI, which demonstrate that the essential requirements (6) of Directive 2001/16/EC have been met |
— |
complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty, |
and may be placed in service.
2. The notified body carries out the procedure, under the condition, that:
— |
the type examination certificate issued prior to the assessment remains valid for the subsystem subject to the application, |
— |
the contracting entity (7) and the main contractor involved are satisfying the obligations of point 3. |
The “main contractor” refers to companies, whose activities contribute to fulfil the essential requirements of the TSI. It concerns:
— |
the company responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem integration), |
— |
other companies only involved in a part of the subsystem project, (performing for example assembly or installation of the subsystem). |
It does not refer to manufacturer sub contractors supplying components and interoperability constituents.
3. For the subsystem that is subject of the EC verification procedure, the contracting entity, or the main contractor when employed, shall operate an approved quality management system for manufacture and final product inspection and testing as specified in point 5 and which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6.
When the contracting entity itself is responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem integration), or the contracting entity is directly involved in the production (including assembly and installation), it has to operate an approved quality management system for those activities, which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6.
If a main contractor is responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem integration), it shall operate in any case an approved quality management system for manufacture and final product inspection and testing, which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6.
EC verification procedure
4.1. The contracting entity shall lodge an application for EC verification of the subsystem (through production quality management system), including co-ordination of the surveillance of the quality management systems, as under point 5.3 and 6.5. with a notified body of its choice. The contracting entity shall inform the manufacturers involved of this choice and of the application.
4.2. The application shall enable the design, manufacture, assembly, installation, maintenance and operation of the subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and the requirements of the TSI to be assessed.
The application shall include:
— |
name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative |
— |
the technical documentation regarding the approved type, including the type examination certificate, as issued after completion of the procedure defined in module SB, |
and, if not included in this documentation,
— |
a general description of the subsystem, its overall design and structure, |
— |
the technical specifications, including European specifications (1), that have been applied, |
— |
any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the above specifications, in particular where these European specifications, and the relevant clauses have not been applied in full. This supporting evidence shall include the results of tests carried out by the appropriate laboratory of the manufacturer or on his behalf. |
— |
the rolling stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI, |
— |
the technical documentation regarding the manufacture and the assembly of the subsystem, |
— |
evidence of conformity to other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates) for the production phase |
— |
a list of the interoperability constituents to be incorporated into the subsystem, |
— |
copies of the EC declarations of conformity or suitability for use with which the constituents shall be provided, and all the necessary elements defined in annex VI of the directives, |
— |
a list of manufacturers, involved in the subsystem’s design, manufacturing, assembly and installation, |
— |
the demonstration, that all stages, as mentioned under point 5.2, are covered by quality management systems of the contracting entity, if involved, and/or of the main contractor, and the evidence of their effectiveness, |
— |
indication of the notified body, responsible for the approval and surveillance of these quality management systems. |
4.3. The notified body shall fist examine the application concerning the validity of the type examination and the type examination certificate.
If the notified body considers the type examination certificate no longer remains valid or is not appropriate and that a new type examination is necessary, it shall justify its decision.
Quality management system
5.1. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor, when employed, shall lodge an application for assessment of their quality management systems with a notified body of their choice.
The application shall include:
— |
all relevant information for the subsystem envisaged, |
— |
the quality management system documentation. |
— |
the technical documentation of the approved type and a copy of the type examination certificate, issued after the completion of the type examination procedure of module SB. |
For those only involved in a part of the subsystem project, the information to be provided is only that for the relevant part.
5.2. For the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project, the quality management systems shall ensure overall compliance of the subsystem with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and overall compliance of the subsystem with the requirements of the TSI. For other contractors, their quality management system(s) has (have) to ensure compliance of their relevant contribution to the subsystem with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI.
All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the applicant(s) shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. This quality management system documentation shall ensure a common understanding of the quality policies and procedures such as quality programmes, plans, manuals and records.
It shall contain in particular an adequate description of the following items for all applicant(s):
— |
the quality objectives and the organisational structure, |
— |
the corresponding manufacturing, quality control and quality management techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used, |
— |
the examinations, checks and tests that will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, assembly and installation, and the frequency with which they will be carried out, |
— |
the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc., and also for the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project: |
— |
responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to overall subsystem quality, including in particular the subsystem integration management. |
The examinations, tests and checking shall cover all of the following stages:
— |
structure of subsystem, including, in particular, civil-engineering activities, constituent assembly, final adjustment, |
— |
final testing of the subsystem, |
— |
and, where specified in the TSI, the validation under full operation conditions. |
5.3. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity shall examine, if all stages of the subsystem as mentioned under point 5.2 are sufficiently and properly covered by the approval and surveillance of the quality management system(s) of the applicant(s) (9).
If the conformity of the subsystem with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and the compliance of the subsystem with the requirements of the TSI is based on more than one quality management system, the notified body shall examine in particular,
— |
if the relations and interfaces between the quality management systems are clearly documented |
— |
and if overall responsibilities and powers of the management for the compliance of the whole entire subsystem for the main contractor are sufficiently and properly defined. |
5.4. The notified body referenced to in point 5.1. shall assess the quality management system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements referenced in point 5.2. It presumes compliance with these requirements if the applicant implements a quality system for production, final product inspection and testing in respect of the Standard EN/ISO 9001-2000, which takes into consideration the specificity of the subsystem for which it is implemented.
When an applicant operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the assessment.
The audit shall be specific for the subsystem concerned, taking into consideration the specific contribution of the applicant to the subsystem. The auditing team shall have at least one member experienced as an assessor in the subsystem technology concerned. The evaluation procedure shall include an assessment visit to the applicant’s premises.
The decision shall be notified to the applicant. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.
5.5. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality management system as approved and to uphold it so that it remains adequate and efficient.
They shall keep the notified body that has approved the quality management system, informed of any significant change that will affect the fulfilment of the TSI requirements by the subsystem.
The notified body shall evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management system will still satisfy the requirements referenced in point 5.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.
lt shall notify its decision to the applicant. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.
Surveillance of the quality management system(s) under the responsibility of the notified body
6.1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor, duly fulfil the obligations arising out of the approved quality management system(s).
6.2. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor shall send to the notified body referenced in point 5.1 (or have sent) all the documents needed for that purpose including the implementation plans and technical records concerning the subsystem (as far as relevant for the specific contribution of the applicants to the subsystem), in particular:
— |
the quality management system documentation, including the particular means implemented to ensure that: |
— |
for the contracting entity or main contractor, responsible for the whole subsystem project, overall responsibilities and powers of the management for the compliance of the whole entire subsystem are sufficiently and properly defined, |
— |
for each applicant, the quality management system is correctly managed for achieving integration at subsystem level, |
— |
the quality records as foreseen by the manufacturing part (including assembly and installation) of the quality management system, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc. |
6.3. The notified body shall periodically carry out audits to make sure that the contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor, maintain and apply the quality management system and shall provide an audit report to them. When those operate a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the surveillance.
The frequency of the audits shall be at least once a year, with at least one audit during the time period of performing relevant activities (manufacture, assembly or installation) of the subsystem being the subject of the EC verification procedure mentioned under point 8.
6.4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the relevant sites of the applicant(s). At the time of such visits, the notified body may conduct complete or partial audits and may carry out or cause to be carried out tests, in order to check the proper functioning of the quality management system where necessary. It shall provide the applicant(s) with an inspection report and also, audit and/or test reports, as appropriate.
6.5. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity and responsible for the EC verification, if not carrying out the surveillance of all the quality management system(s) concerned, shall co ordinate the surveillance activities of any other notified body responsible for that task, in order:
— |
to be ensured that correct management of interfaces between the different quality management systems relating to subsystem integration has been performed, |
— |
to collect, in liaison with the contracting entity, the necessary elements for the assessment to guarantee the consistency and the overall supervision of the different quality management systems. |
This co ordination includes the rights of the notified body:
— |
to receive all documentation (approval and surveillance), issued by the other notified bodies, |
— |
to witness the surveillance audits in point 6.3, |
— |
to initiate additional audits as in point 6.4 under its responsibility and together with the other notified bodies. |
7. The notified body as referenced in point 5.1. shall have entrance for inspection purposes, audit and surveillance to the locations of building sites, production workshops, locations of assembly and installations, storage areas and where appropriate, prefabrication and testing facilities and, more general, to all premises which it considers necessary in order to carry out its tasks, in accordance with the applicant’s specific contribution to the subsystem project.
8. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor shall, for a period of 10 years after the last subsystem has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of the national authorities:
— |
the documentation referenced in the second indent of the second subparagraph of point 5.1, |
— |
the updating referenced in the second subparagraph of point 5.5, |
— |
the decisions and reports from the notified body, which are, referenced in points 5.4, 5.5 and 6.4. |
9. Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the notified body shall then, based on the type examination and the approval and surveillance of the quality management system(s), draw up the certificate of conformity intended for the contracting entity, who shall in turn draw up the EC declaration of verification intended for the supervisory authority in the Member State within which the subsystem is located and/or operates.
The EC declaration of verification and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed. The declaration shall be written in the same language of the technical file and shall contain at least the information included in Annex V of the Directive.
10. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity shall be responsible for compiling the technical file that has to accompany the EC declaration of verification. The technical file shall include at least the information indicated in the Art 18 (3) of the Directive, and in particular as follows:
— |
all necessary documents relating to the characteristics of the subsystem, |
— |
a list of interoperability constituents incorporated into the subsystem, |
— |
copies of the EC declarations of conformity and, where appropriate, of the EC declarations of suitability for use, which said constituents shall be provided in accordance with Article 13 of the Directive, accompanied, where appropriate, by the corresponding documents (certificates, quality management system approvals and surveillance documents) issued by the notified bodies, |
— |
all elements relating to the maintenance, the conditions and limits for use of the subsystem, |
— |
all elements relating to the instructions concerning servicing, constant or routine monitoring, adjustment and maintenance, |
— |
the type-examination certificate for the subsystem and the accompanying technical documentation as defined in the module SB, |
— |
evidence of conformity with other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates) |
— |
certificate of conformity of the notified body as mentioned under point 9, accompanied by corresponding verification and/or calculation notes and countersigned by itself, stating that the project complies with the Directive and the TSI, and mentioning, where appropriate, reservations recorded during performance of the activities and not withdrawn. The certificate should also be accompanied by the inspection and audit reports drawn up in connection with the verification, as mentioned in points 6.3 and 6.4 and in particular: |
— |
the rolling stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI. |
11. Each notified body shall communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the quality management system approvals issued, withdrawn or refused.
The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of the quality management system approvals issued.
12. The records accompanying the certificate of conformity shall be lodged with the contracting entity.
The contracting entity within the Community shall keep a copy of the technical file throughout the service life of the subsystem and for a further period of three years; it shall be sent to any other Member State which so requests.
To check with the requirement in the directive annex VI (the proposition modifies the directive)
F.3.3. Module SF: Product Verification
1. This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies at the request of an contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the Community, that a subsystem, for which a type-examination certificate has already been issued by a notified body,
— |
complies with this TSI and any other applicable TSI, which demonstrate that the essential requirements (6) of Directive 2001/16/EC have been met |
— |
complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty |
and may be placed into service
2. The contracting entity (7) shall lodge an application for EC verification (through product verification) of the subsystem with a notified body of his choice.
The application shall include:
— |
The name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative |
— |
the technical documentation. |
3. Within that part of the procedure the contracting entity checks and attests that the subsystem concerned is in conformity with the type as described in the type examination certificate and satisfies the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
The notified body shall carrying out the procedure under the condition that the type examination certificate issued prior to the assessment remains valid for the subsystem subject to the application.
4. The contracting entity shall take all measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process (including assembly and integration of interoperability constituents by main contractor (10) when employed) ensures conformity of the subsystem with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
5. The application shall enable the design, manufacture, installation, maintenance and operation of the subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and the requirements of the TSI to be assessed.
The application shall include:
— |
the technical documentation regarding the approved type, including the type examination certificate, as issued after completion of the procedure defined in module SB, |
and, if not included in this documentation,
— |
a general description of the subsystem, overall design and structure, |
— |
the rolling stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI, |
— |
conceptual design and manufacturing information, for example drawings, schemes of components, subassemblies, assemblies, circuits, etc., |
— |
the technical documentation regarding the manufacture and the assembly of the subsystem, |
— |
the technical specifications, including European specifications (1), that have been applied, |
— |
any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the above specifications, in particular where these European specifications and the relevant clauses have not been applied in full, |
— |
evidence of conformity to other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates) for the production phase |
— |
a list of the Interoperability Constituents, to be incorporated into the subsystem, |
— |
copies of the EC declarations of conformity or suitability for use with which said constituents shall be provided and all the necessary elements defined in annex VI of the directives, |
— |
a list of manufacturers involved in the subsystem’s design, manufacture, assembly and installation, |
If the TSI requires further information for the technical documentation, this shall be included.
6. The notified body shall first examine the application concerning the validity of the type examination and the type examination certificate.
If the notified body considers the type examination certificate no longer remains valid or is not appropriate and that a new type examination is necessary, it shall justify its decision.
The notified body shall carry out the appropriate examinations and tests in order to check the conformity of the subsystem with the type, as described in the type examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI. The notified body shall examine and testing of every subsystem manufactured as a serial product, as specified in point 4
Verification by examination and testing of every subsystem (as a serial product)
7.1. The notified body shall carry out the tests, examinations and verifications, to ensure conformity of the subsystems, as serial products as provided for in the TSI. The examinations, tests and checking shall extend to the stages as provided for in the TSI.
7.2. Each subsystem (as serial product) shall be individually examined, tested and verified (11) in order to verify its conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and the requirements of the TSI that apply to it. When a test is not set out in the TSI, (or in a European Standard quoted in the TSI), the relevant European Specifications or equivalent tests are applicable.
8. The notified body shall agree with the contracting entity (and the main contractor) the locations where the tests will be carried out and shall agree that final testing of the subsystem and, whenever required in the TSI, tests or validation under full operating conditions, are carried out by the contracting entity under direct supervision and attendance of the notified body.
The notified body shall have entrance for testing and verification purposes to production workshops, locations of assembly and installations, and where appropriate, prefabrication and testing facilities in order to carry out its tasks as provided for in the TSI.
9. Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the notified body shall draw up the certificate of conformity intended for the contracting entity, which in turn draws up the EC declaration of verification intended for the supervisory authority in the Member State where the subsystem is located and/or operates.
These NB activities shall be based on the type examination and the tests, verifications and checks carried out on all serial products as indicated in point 7 and required in the TSI and/or in the relevant European specifications.
The EC declaration of verification and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed. The declaration shall be written in the same language of the technical file and shall contain at least the information included in Annex V of the Directive.
10. The notified body shall be responsible for compiling the technical file that has to accompany the EC declaration of verification. The technical file shall include at least the information indicated in Art.18 (3) of the Directives, and in particular as follows:
— |
all necessary documents relating to the characteristics of the subsystem |
— |
the rolling stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI, |
— |
the list of interoperability constituents incorporated into the subsystem, |
— |
copies of the EC declarations of conformity and, where appropriate, of the EC declarations of suitability for use, which the constituents shall be provided in accordance with Article13 of the Directive, accompanied, where appropriate, by the corresponding documents (certificates, quality management system approvals and surveillance documents) issued by the notified bodies, |
— |
all elements relating to the maintenance, the conditions and limits for use of the subsystem, |
— |
all elements relating to the instructions concerning servicing, constant or routine monitoring, adjustment and maintenance, |
— |
the type-examination certificate for the subsystem and accompanying technical documentation, as defined in the module SB |
— |
certificate of conformity of the notified body as mentioned in point 9, accompanied by corresponding calculation notes and countersigned by itself, stating that the project complies with the directive and the TSI, and mentioning, where appropriate, reservations recorded during performance of activities and not withdrawn. The certificate should also be accompanied, if relevant, by the inspection and audit reports drawn up in connection with the verification. |
11. The records accompanying the certificate of conformity shall be lodged with the contracting entity.
The contracting entity shall keep a copy of the technical file throughout the service life of the subsystem and for a further period of three years; it shall be sent to any other Member State which so requests.
F.3.4. Module SH2: Full Quality Management System with Design Examination
1. This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies, at the request of an contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the Community, that a subsystem
— |
complies with this TSI and any other applicable TSI, which demonstrate that the essential requirements (6) of Directive 2001/16/EC have been met |
— |
complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty. |
and may be placed in service
2. The notified body shall carry out the procedure, including a design examination of the subsystem, under the condition, that the contracting entity (7) and the main contractor involved are satisfying the obligations of point. 3
The “main contractor” refers to companies, whose activities contribute to fulfil the essential requirements of the TSI. It concerns the company:
— |
responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem integration), |
— |
other companies involved only in a part of the subsystem project (performing for example design, assembly or installation of the subsystem). |
It does not refer to manufacturer sub contractors supplying components and interoperability constituents.
3. For the subsystem that is subject of the EC verification procedure, the contracting entity or the main contractor, when employed, shall operate an approved quality management system for design, manufacture and final product inspection and testing as specified in point 5 and which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6
The main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem integration), shall operate in any case an approved quality management system for design, manufacture and final product inspection and testing, which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6.
In the case that the contracting entity itself is responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem integration) or that the contracting entity is directly involved in the design and/or production (including assembly and installation), it shall operate an approved quality management system for those activities, which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6.
Applicants which are only involved in assembly and installation, are permitted to operate only an approved quality management system for manufacture and final product inspection and testing
EC verification procedure
4.1. The contracting entity shall lodge an application for EC verification of the subsystem (through full quality management system with design examination), including co ordination of surveillance of the quality management systems as in points 5.4. and 6.6., with a notified body of its choice. The contracting entity shall inform the manufacturers involved of his choice and of the application.
4.2. The application shall enable the design, manufacture, assembly, installation, maintenance and operation of the subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the requirements of the TSI to be assessed.
The application shall include:
— |
name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative, |
— |
the technical documentation including:
|
— |
the technical design specifications, including European specifications (1), that have been applied, |
— |
any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the above specifications, in particular where the European specificationsand the relevant clauses have not been applied in full. |
— |
the test programme |
— |
the rolling stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI, |
— |
the technical documentation regarding the manufacture, the assembly of the subsystem,
|
— |
the explanation, of how all stages, as mentioned in point 5.2, are covered by quality management systems of the main contractor and/or of the contracting entity, if involved, and the evidence of their effectiveness, |
— |
indication of the notified body (ies) responsible for the approval and surveillance of these quality management systems. |
4.3. The contracting entity shall present the results of examinations, checking and tests (4) including type tests when required, carried out by its appropriate laboratory or on their behalf.
4.4. The notified body shall examine the application concerning the design examination and assess the results of the tests. Where the design meets the provisions of the Directive and of the TSI that apply to it shall issue a design examination certificate to the applicant. The certificate shall contain the conclusions of the design examination, conditions for its validity, the necessary data for identification of the design examined and, if relevant, a description of the subsystem’s functioning.
If the contracting entity is denied a design examination certificate, the notified body shall provide detailed reasons for such denial.
Provision shall be made for an appeals procedure.
4.5. During the production phase, the applicant shall inform the notified body that holds the technical documentation concerning the design examination certificate of all modifications which may affect the conformity with the requirements of the TSI or the prescribed conditions for use of the subsystem. The subsystem shall receive additional approval in such cases. In this case, the notified body shall perform only those examinations and tests, those are relevant and necessary to the changes. This additional approval may be given either in the form of an addition to the original design examination certificate, or by issue of a new certificate after withdrawal of the old certificate.
Quality management system
5.1. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor, when employed, shall lodge an application for assessment of their quality management systems with a notified body of their choice.
The application shall include:
— |
all relevant information for the subsystem envisaged, |
— |
the quality management system documentation. |
For those only involved in a part of the subsystem project, the information to be provided is only that for the relevant part.
5.2. For the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project, the quality management system shall ensure overall compliance of the subsystem with the requirements of the TSI.
The quality management system(s), for other contractors, has (have) to ensure compliance of their relevant contribution to the subsystem, with the requirements of the TSI.
All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the applicants shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. This quality management system documentation shall ensure a common understanding of the quality policies and procedures such as quality programmes, plans, manuals and records.
The system shall contain in particular an adequate description of the following items:
— |
for all applicants:
|
— |
for the main contractor, as far as relevant for its contribution to the design of the subsystem:
|
— |
and also for the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project:
|
The examinations, tests and checking shall cover all of the following stages:
— |
overall design, |
— |
structure of the subsystem, including, in particular, civil-engineering activities, constituent assembly, final adjustment, |
— |
final testing of the subsystem, |
— |
and, where specified in the TSI, the validation under full operation conditions. |
5.3. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity shall examine, if all stages of the subsystem as mentioned in point 5.2 are sufficiently and properly covered by the approval and surveillance of the quality management system(s) of the applicant(s) (11).
If the compliance of the subsystem with the requirements of the TSI is based on more than one quality management system, the notified body shall examine in particular,
— |
if the relations and interfaces between the quality management systems are clearly documented and if overall responsibilities and powers of the management for the compliance of the whole entire subsystem for the main contractor are sufficiently and properly defined. |
5.4. The notified body referenced in point 5.1. shall assess the quality management system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements of point 5.2. It presumes compliance with these requirements if the applicant implements a quality system for design, production, final product inspection and testing in respect of the Standard EN/ISO 9001-2000, which takes into consideration the specificity of the subsystem for which it is implemented.
When an applicant operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the assessment.
The audit shall be specific for the subsystem concerned, taking into consideration the specific contribution of the applicant to the subsystem. The auditing team shall have at least one member experienced as an assessor in the subsystem technology concerned. The evaluation procedure shall include an assessment visit to the applicant’s premises.
The decision shall be notified to the applicant. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.
5.5. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality management system as approved and to uphold it so that it remains adequate and efficient.
They shall keep the notified body that has approved their quality management system informed of any significant change that will affect the fulfilment of the requirements by the subsystem.
The notified body shall evaluate any modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management system will still satisfy the requirements of point 5.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.
It shall notify its decision to the applicant. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.
Surveillance of the quality management system(s) under the responsibility of the notified body
6.1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor duly fulfil the obligations arising out of the approved quality management system(s).
6.2. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor shall send the notified body referenced in point 5.1. (or have sent) all the documents needed for that purpose and in particular the implementation plans and technical records concerning the subsystem (as far as relevant for the specific contribution of the applicant to the subsystem), including:
— |
the quality management system documentation, including the particular means implemented to ensure that |
— |
for the contracting entity or the main contractor, responsible for the whole subsystem project, overall responsibilities and powers of the management for the compliance of the whole entire subsystem are sufficiently and properly defined, |
— |
for each applicant, the quality management system is correctly managed for achieving integration at subsystem level, |
— |
the quality records as foreseen by the design part of the quality management system, such as results of analyses, calculations, tests, etc., |
— |
the quality records as foreseen by the manufacturing part (including assembly, installation and integration) of the quality management system, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, competency records of the personnel concerned, etc. |
6.3. The notified body shall periodically carry out audits to make sure that the contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor maintain and apply the quality management system and shall provide an audit report to them. When they operate a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the surveillance.
The frequency of the audits shall be at least once a year, with at least one audit during the time period of performing the relevant activities (design, manufacture, assembly or installation) for the subsystem being the subject of the EC verification procedure mentioned in point 4.
6.4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the sites mentioned in point 5.2 of the applicant(s). At the time of such visits, the notified body may conduct complete or partial audits and may carry out or cause to be carried out tests in order to check the proper functioning of the quality management system where necessary. It shall provide the applicant(s) with an inspection report and audit and/or test reports as appropriate.
6.5. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity and responsible for the EC verification, if not carrying out the surveillance of all the quality management system(s) concerned as under point 5, shall co ordinate the surveillance activities of any other notified bodies responsible for that task, in order:
— |
to be ensured that correct management of interfaces between the different quality management systems relating to subsystem integration has been performed. |
— |
to collect, in liaison with the contracting entity, the necessary elements for the assessment to guarantee the consistency and the overall supervision of the different quality management systems. |
This co ordination includes the right of the notified body
— |
to receive all documentation (approval and surveillance), issued by the other notified body(s), |
— |
to witness the surveillance audits as in point 5.4., |
— |
to initiate additional audits as in point 5.5. under its responsibility and together with the other notified body(s). |
7. The notified body as referenced under point 5.1. shall have entrance for inspection purposes, audit and surveillance to the locations of design, building sites, production workshops, locations of assembly and installation, storage areas and. where appropriate, prefabrication or testing facilities and, more general, to all premises which it considers necessary for its task, in accordance with the applicant’s specific contribution to the subsystem project.
8. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor shall, for a period of 10 years after the last subsystem has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of the national authorities:
— |
the documentation referenced in the second indent of the second subparagraph of point 5.1, |
— |
the updating referenced in the second subparagraph of point 5.5, |
— |
the decisions and reports from the notified body which are referenced in the points 5.4, 5.5 and 6.4 |
9. Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the notified body shall then, based on the design examination and the approval and surveillance of the quality management system (s), draw up the certificate of conformity intended for the contracting entity, who shall in turn draw up the EC declaration of verification intended for the supervisory authority in the Member State within which the subsystem is located and/or operates.
The EC declaration of verification and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed. The declaration shall be written in the same language of the technical file and shall contain at least the information included in Annex V of the Directive.
10. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity shall be responsible for compiling the technical file that has to accompany the EC declaration of verification. The technical file shall include at least the information indicated in Art 18 (3) of The Directive, and in particular as follows:
— |
all necessary documents relating to the characteristics of the subsystem |
— |
the list of interoperability constituents incorporated into the subsystem, |
— |
copies of the EC declarations of conformity and, where appropriate, of the EC declarations of suitability for use, which the constituents shall be provided in accordance with Article 13 of the Directive, accompanied, where appropriate, by the corresponding documents (certificates, quality management system approvals and surveillance documents) issued by the notified bodies,
|
— |
all elements relating to the maintenance, the conditions and limits for use of the subsystem, |
— |
all elements relating to the instructions concerning servicing, constant or routine monitoring, adjustment and maintenance |
— |
certificate of conformity of the notified body as mentioned under point 9, accompanied by corresponding verification and/or calculation notes and countersigned by itself, stating that the project complies with the Directive and the TSI, and mentioning, where appropriate, reservations recorded during performance of the activities and not withdrawn. The certificate should also be accompanied, if relevant, by the inspection and audit reports drawn up in connection with the verification, as mentioned in points 6.4. and 6.5.;
|
11. Each notified body shall communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the quality management system approvals and the EC design examination certificates, which it has issued, withdrawn or refused.
The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of:
— |
the quality management system approvals and additional approvals issued and |
— |
the EC design examination certificates and additions issued |
12. The records accompanying the certificate of conformity shall be lodged with the contracting entity
The contracting entity shall keep a copy of the technical file throughout the service life of the subsystem and for a further period of three years; it shall be sent to any other Member State which so requests.
F.4. Assessment of Maintenance Arrangements: Conformity Assessment Procedure
This is an open point.
(1) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 2001/16/EC. The guide for application of HS TSIs explains the way to use the European Specifications
(2) When necessary, the manufacturer's discretion may be limited for specific constituents. In this case, the relevant verification process required for the interoperability constituent is specified in the TSI (or in its annexes)
(3) The manufacturer's discretion may be limited in specific TSIs
(4) The presentation of the results of the tests can be at the same time as the application or later.
(5) During the time of in service experience, the IC is not placed on the market.
(6) The essential requirements are reflected in the technical parameters, interfaces and performance requirements, which are set out in Chapter 4 of the TSI.
(7) In the module, “the contracting entity” means “the subsystem contracting entity, as defined in the directive. or his authorised representative established within the Community”.
(8) The relevant section of a TSI may define specific requirements in this regard.
(9) For the rolling stock TSI, the notified body may participate to the final in service test of locomotives or train set in the conditions specified in the relevant chapter of the TSI.
(10) The “main contractor” refers to companies, whose activities contribute to fulfil essential requirements of the TSI. It concerns the company that can be responsible for the whole subsystem project or other companies only involved in a part of the subsystem project, (performing for example assembly or installation of the subsystem).
(11) In particular, for the rolling stock TSI, the notified body will participate in the final in service testing of rolling stock or train set. This will be indicated in the relevant chapter of the TSI
ANNEX G
Effects of Crosswinds
G.1. General remarks
This annex defines the approach for assessing the crosswind stability of Class 1 trains according to the TSI definition.
Tilting trains are not dealt with explicitly in the present document. However, tilting trains running at conventional cant deficiencies in a non-tilting mode may be treated as non-tilting trains. Tilting trains running at conventional cant deficiencies with tilting mechanism on will be characterised in tilting car body position.
G.2. Introduction
The general idea about the methodology is that:
— |
the cross wind stability of a train can be assessed using Characteristic Wind Curves |
— |
the crosswind characteristics of a line and its operation can be assessed by considering the crosswind risk that a certain well-defined reference train will experience when operating on that line. |
If a train does not fulfil these general requirements it is still permitted to prove its crosswind safety on a specific line.
G.3. General principles
The critical event under consideration is train overturning. Interoperable trains shall have a basic level of safety against this critical event. The train contribution to the safety level is defined by a set of Characteristic Reference Wind Curves (CRWC). A train can be regarded as interoperable from the crosswind point of view if its Characteristic Wind Curves (CWC) are at least as good as the CRWC.
A particular train is defined by its most critical vehicle. Usually, this vehicle is one of the two leading or end vehicles. If another vehicle in the train is considered to be more wind sensitive (e.g. a very high or light vehicle), it has to be considered. The choice of the most sensitive vehicle shall be fully justified.
For a given train running at a range of speeds, the CWC define the maximum natural wind speed that a train can withstand before a characteristic limit for wheel unloading is exceeded. The criterion that defines the CWC is the average value of wheel unloading, ΔQ, of the most critical running gear. The term ‘average’ means that, in case of bogies, wheel unloading is averaged over the two wheelsets of the bogie.
G.4. Range of application
The operational mode of the high-speed trains is considered for non-tilting trains and for tilting trains in non-tilting mode when they are running with a cant deficiency as set out in High Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006.
It is assumed that the train runs under European operational and wind conditions.
G.5. Assessment of Characteristic Wind Curves
G.5.1. Aerodynamic properties determination
G.5.1.1. General remarks
Currently only wind tunnel tests are considered capable of giving sufficiently reliable train aerodynamic properties.
Aerodynamic properties shall be determined for both a flat ground and an embankment configuration consisting of a 6m reference embankment.
One reference vehicle, namely the ICE3 or the TGV Duplex or the ETR500 front vehicles, followed by the relevant second vehicle, shall have been tested and measured the same way in the same wind tunnel when a new vehicle is investigated.
The definition of the aerodynamic coordinate system and the aerodynamic coefficients shall be consistent with EN 14067-1:2003.
G.5.1.2. Wind tunnel test requirements
The dimensions of the wind tunnel shall be as large as possible so as to avoid boundary interference effects, (e.g. from the walls, the boundary layer of the roof and the ground) and wind tunnel blockage effects. In particular, when investigating the aerodynamic forces and moments on the embankment, blockage effects shall be considered.
G.5.1.2.1. Test section dimensions
For yaw angles up to 30°, the blockage shall not exceed 10 %, even when an embankment is present.
For wind tunnels with a closed test section, blockage corrections are advised for blockage ratios exceeding 5 %.
For wind tunnels with open or partially open test section, the blockage ratio shall be smaller than 5 % at a yaw angle of 30° and no corrections are to be applied.
G.5.1.2.2. Turbulence level
The atmospheric turbulence layer shall not be represented in the wind tunnel tests. It is necessary to ensure turbulence level Tux ≤ 2,5 %, where with u denoting the stream wise velocity component.
G.5.1.2.3. Boundary layer
The wind tunnel velocity profile shall be a uniform, i.e. block, profile. The flow speed shall be independent of the height above ground, except for a thin boundary layer on the wind tunnel floor. The thickness of the boundary layer, δ95%, shall be small relative to the height of the vehicle.
G.5.1.2.4. Reynolds’ number
The Reynolds’ number based on the wind tunnel speed, the characteristic length of 3 m (divided by the model scale) should exceed the critical value above which the forces and moments do not change significantly with increasing Reynolds’ number. This shall be demonstrated by test results.
The Mach number shall be no higher than 0,3. If the real train operates at Mach numbers higher than 0,3, the Mach number shall not be higher than the Mach number of the real train.
G.5.1.2.5. Instrumentation
The density of the air in the wind tunnel and its temperature, pressure and humidity shall be determined.
The aerodynamic forces and aerodynamic moments have to be determined using a five component dynamometer balance, (CFx is not needed) The sensitivity and the mounting of the balance shall be in accordance with the range of loads measured
G.5.1.3. Model requirements
The dimensional accuracy of the model shall be better than 10 mm with respect to the full-scale dimensions. All essential details of aerodynamic importance, such as the front windshield or the pantograph cut out shall be replicated true to scale.
The pantograph itself shall not be modelled.
A simplification of the bogies is allowed; only the basic geometrical properties of the bogies shall be represented in order to ensure the correct mass flux and the pressure drop in the underbelly flow regime.
The model should be symmetrical, even if the real train is not build perfectly symmetrically (e.g. due to details in the under floor region). This permits a symmetry check to be made in the wind tunnel to investigate sources of error in the measurement due to flow asymmetries.
G.5.1.4. Test programme requirements
Symmetry and repeatability checks shall be performed to ensure the validity of results.
Yaw angles
Yaw angles between 0° and 70°, in steps of 5°, shall be considered.
A linear or higher order interpolation shall be used for all intermediate yaw angles.
Upstream and downstream bodies
For all vehicles under investigation a down-stream body of at least half the vehicle length has to be placed next to model. The true cross section shall be represented at least for one-third of a vehicle length; the trailing edge of this body shall be streamlined.
If the vehicle under investigation is not a leading vehicle, at least one full vehicle ahead need to be present to ensure realistic upstream flow conditions. The true intercar-gap between the vehicles has to be represented. Mechanical contact between the tested model and the passive bodies shall be excluded at all times. Vibration of the model and adjacent passive bodies shall be avoided.
Ground Configurations
Until the ground configurations are clearly defined in a European standard, the following shall be applied:
Measurements shall be conducted for two scenarios:
— |
a flat ground scenario The flat ground configuration shall not incorporate a representation of the ballast bed and rails. The clearance between the ground level and the bottom of the wheels is 235 mm based on full scale. |
— |
and for a standardised embankment scenario:
|
The Cmx,lee aerodynamic coefficient for relevant yaw angles obtained from the test on the reference vehicle should confirm the quality within 10 % for flat ground and 20 % for embankment case.
Figure G.2.
Ballast and rail.
Figure G.3.
Standard 6 m embankment.
G.5.2. Description of the Wind Scenario
The gust generated for the method corresponds to a fixed amplitude (corresponding to a probability level of amplitude ~ 99 %) and a probability level exceeding 50 % for the gust duration (the mode of the distribution). Furthermore, the chosen approach has the following characteristics:
— |
The gust time-space model (bi-exponential) is based on a gust model investigated in Deufrako and corresponds to the best approximation of a random process in the vicinity of a local maximum. |
— |
The mean wind is assumed to be horizontal (only the longitudinal component U is used). This component represents the prominent part of wind fluctuations and is the projection of the instantaneous wind vector in the mean wind direction. |
— |
Variations of wind direction are not taken into account. |
— |
Temporal variations are neglected in favour of spatial variations. |
The input data for the scenario are:
Vtr |
train speed, |
Umax |
maximum wind speed, |
γ |
wind direction with respect to the line. |
The following parameters are fixed:
z = 4 m |
reference height, |
à = 2,84 |
normalized gust amplitude à = (Umax — U)/σu with mean wind speed U, |
z0 = 0,07 m |
roughness length of sites representative of interoperable lines, |
Pr(T) = 0,5 |
probability of a gust of duration T for a given amplitude A. |
G.5.3. Calculation of the turbulence characteristics
G.5.3.1. Turbulence Intensity
At a site of height z = 4 m, the turbulence intensity I equals 0,245. The gust factor is calculated from the turbulence intensity and the normalised gust amplitude:
G = 1 + Ã · l = 1,6946.
A fixed value of the normalised amplitude, hence of the gust factor is chosen. In special areas, or for specific applications, different values for à could be chosen from meteorological measurement analysis.
From the gust factor the mean wind Umean can be deduced from a given maximum wind Umax:
.
The standard deviation of longitudinal component (following the mean wind speed) of the wind σu is then deduced from the mean wind speed and the turbulence intensity:
.
G.5.3.2. Gust Duration
The calculation of the gust time constants is derived from the spectral characteristics (PSD) of the longitudinal characteristic length (i.e. following the gust, x-direction, u-component)
The mean duration of gusts, , is given by the following integral quotient
,
Where the power spectral density (PSD) of turbulence is given by the Von Karman expression:
where
is the normalised frequency and
n the frequency ranging from minimal(n1) to maximal(n2) values. These values n1 and n2 are the limit values for the gust frequency spectrum integration. The lower frequency n1 is taken as 1/300 Hz and the upper frequency n2 is taken as 1 Hz.
The duration of the maximum gust is then given by:
,
where the exponent q was given by measurements and is taken as 1,42).
G.5.3.3. Derivation of the resulting time history of the gust
From knowledge of the time constants, the time history of the non-dimensional wind variations in the longitudinal and lateral directions following the mean wind direction can be derived. Then the non-dimensional wind speed variations of the component u in the longitudinal direction ax and lateral direction ay can be written at a distance s of the maximum of the gust as:
with s being the coordinate following the track in s = Vtr · (t-tmax), tmax is the time of the maximum gust impact on the train, and D is the angle between track and wind direction.
From the coherence decay and exponent coefficient of the gust parallel and perpendicular to the mean wind speed a correlation function at an instant t can be calculated as:
with
C(t) being the correlation function between the amplitude of the gust at instant t and the maximum amplitude of gust;
is the coherence decay coefficient in the mean wind direction (parameter value: 5,0);
is the coherence decay coefficient perpendicular to the mean wind direction (parameter value: 16,0);
is the exponent coefficient in the mean wind direction (parameter value: 1,0)
is the exponent coefficient perpendicular to the mean wind direction (parameter value: 1,0).
All the parameters values are based on measurements.
The wind speed impacting on the train can then be written from the following formula
.
For the wind scenario the following time-history has to be considered (the time of the maximum gust is t3 = 14 sec):
From t = 0 to t = t1 = 0,5 s: vwind(t) = 0;
From t = t1 = 0,5 s to t = t2 = 3 s: linear increase of vwind to reach Umean at t = t2 = 3 s;
From t = t2 = 3 s to t = t3 = 10 s: vwind(t) = Umean;
From t = t3 = 10 s to t = t4 = 14 s: vwind(t) = Umean + Ã · σu · C(t);
From t = t4 = 14 s to t = t5 = 17 s: vwind(t) = Umean + Ã · σu · C(t);
From t = t5 = 17 s to t = t6 = 30 sec vwind(t) = Umean.
The time-history of the wind speed is illustrated in Figure G.1.
Figure G.1.
Illustration of time-history for the wind speed.
Remark: This gust scenario is not appropriate for fully articulated trainsets. For such trainsets an alternative gust scenario shall be developed.
The spatial wind scenario shall be filtered with a spatial-average filter based on a window size equal to the vehicle length and a step size smaller than 0,5 m.
G.5.4. Vehicle dynamics determination
G.5.4.1. General remarks
Multibody simulations (MBS) shall be used to determine the vehicle dynamic behaviour under strong wind.
A general-purpose, validated MBS program shall be used along with a gust scenario. Modelling shall consider the most critical vehicle of the train and that this vehicle is empty and in running order. A check shall be made that an even distribution of passenger is not more critical than an empty vehicle (for instance due to centre of gravity shifts), e.g. by using a simplified check with a fully static approach.
If there is no roll restraint at the coupling, only the critical vehicle needs to be modelled, otherwise adjacent vehicles shall be modelled too.
Track irregularities shall not be considered.
The calculation shall be carried out with standard gauge, UIC60 rail profile, new wheel profile and 1/20 and 1/40 rail inclinations. The worst case will be used for assessment against the limits.
The aerodynamic forces and moments shall be included.
The criterion that defines the CWC is the average value of wheel unloading, ΔQ, of the most critical running gear (bogie or single axle in case of single axle running gear). This unloading shall not exceed 90 % of the static axle loads, Q0 , of the running gear as given in the following formula:
.
G.5.4.2. Modelling
The modelling of the vehicle shall be adequate for the investigation of cross wind characteristics. The dynamic model of the vehicle shall be 3D.
The dynamic model of the vehicle shall incorporate at least the following features:
— |
Car-body, bogies and wheelsets and other relevant parts of the vehicle (masses, inertias, geometry and centres of gravity). |
— |
Suspensions (stiffness of the springs in the vertical, lateral and longitudinal directions, non-linearity in stiffness, damping characteristics in the vertical and lateral directions, damping non-linearity), |
— |
Bump stops which could come into play. |
— |
Wheel/rail contact (nominal wheel and rail profiles as defined by the High-Speed TSI, contact forces calculated featuring nonlinear contact geometry and creep force/creep relation. Any special further device in the suspension system which might have an effect on the overturning mechanism. |
G.5.4.3. Verification of the Vehicle Model
A verification of the MBS model, based on full-scale test data, shall be provided. It is essential to compare the suspension coefficient and the masses and centres of gravities between the simulation and the test cases, both with the empty (unloaded) vehicle.
The definition of the suspension coefficient ‘s’ shall comply with clause 4.2.3.9 of this TSI. If more than one value for s is available from test, the average shall be taken. The difference between the simulation and the test shall not exceed 10 %.
The correctness of the modelling of the bump stops shall be proven. The simulation results regarding displacements to the stops shall meet with the design data.
The total mass of the vehicle is measured as the sum of all vertical Q0 forces. The averaged measured mass of the first two production vehicles shall not be less than 99 % of the vehicle mass used in the simulation. Furthermore the measured individual axle load, averaged on the first two production vehicles, shall not be less than 99 % of the individual axle loads used in the simulation.
When information is available, the following test results shall be evaluated:
— |
Transient records of Q-forces at each wheel of the leading two wheel sets for different curve radius classes (according to clause 5 of EN14363:2005) when running with cant deficiency. |
— |
Extended data processing (‘two-dimensional’ evaluation) for the 50 % values of the Q-forces as given in clause 5.5 EN14363:2005. |
G.6. Aerodynamic Forces and Moments as Inputs for the Multi-Body Simulation
For each case defined in section G.7.4, different calculations of the vehicle responses to gusts defined by their maximum speed Umax shall be computed for increasing values of Umax until the criteria defined in section G.7.1 are met. The corresponding plots of Umax values meeting the maximum unloading criteria against the vehicle speed and/or wind angle are called characteristic wind curves (CWC). The presentation of CWC is described in detail in section G.7.4.
The simulation of the vehicle response to a gust shall be performed using the gust scenario described in section G.5.
For both flat ground and embankment configurations, the five components of forces and moments (Fy, Fz, Mx, My and Mz) shall be calculated using the following formulae:
|
, , |
|
|
for the embankment configuration |
and
|
|
|
where
— |
U(t) is the upstream wind speed. |
— |
CSV = 1,2416 for the windward case and |
— |
CSV = 1,1705 for the leeward case. For the flat ground configuration C(t) = 1,0. |
G(t) is the instantaneous gust factor calculated by dividing the instantaneous wind speed of the Chinese hat by the mean speed.
The density employed for the calculation of aerodynamic forces and moments is ρ = 1,225 kg/m3″
The simulation is done without any track irregularities.
It shall be proven that the integration method calculates an integration step at the maximum wind peak. The output step size of the calculation shall be lower than 1/30s.
G.7. Calculation and Representation of Characteristic Wind Curves
G.7.1. Evaluation of the Criterion
From each simulation run of the parameter variation time data of the Q-forces for each wheel are obtained.
The following calculation steps are needed:
— |
Calculation of the ΔQ/Q0 values by the time-data of Q-forces
|
— |
Low-pass filtering of ΔQ/Q0 with a 2 Hz 4th order Butterworth filter, or another filter shown to be equivalent. |
— |
Identify the maximumΔQ/Q0 value over the running gear. |
Herein Q0 are the Q-forces for the empty (unloaded) vehicle without any excitation, Qi1 are the Q-forces of the unloaded wheel of the first wheel set in the bogie and Qj1 are the Q-forces of the unloaded wheel of the second wheel set in the bogie.
G.7.2. Calculation of the Wind Values and Limiting Values for ΔQ/Q0
For curved track the centrifugal force acts in addition to the crosswind on the vehicle.
The calculation shall be performed using MBS on straight track, canted according to aq values.
G.7.3. Considering Different Wind Angles
The computed characteristic wind velocities can be transferred to other combinations of train speeds and angles.
Usually the characteristic wind velocity is given for a wind angle of 90° to the track. To obtain the CWC for other angles, a geometric decomposition/addition of the velocity vectors has to be carried out first (see Figure G.4).
Figure G.4.
Geometric approach considering the angle of attack.
Here, v a is the wind acting on the vehicle. A decomposition of v a into a component coming from the train speed (vtr0 and v tr1) and a component coming from the wind speed (vW0 and vW1) can be made in various ways. For the vector chain vW0 and vtr0 the wind angle is βw0, and for the vector chain vW1 and vtr1 the wind angle is βw1. Then, for the new triple (vtr, vw, βw) the characteristic wind velocity can be derived from the CWC, originally based on another triple vtr, vw, βw. For straight track, the wind velocity for different angles of attack can be directly drawn out in a diagram. An example is illustrated in the Figure G.5.
Figure G.5.
Geometric approach to consider the angle of attack of CWC on straight track.
G.7.4. Representation of Wind Characteristics by Distinct Points
The characteristic wind curves are based on the following points. For these points the characteristic wind speeds shall be computed.
G.7.4.1. Vehicle on straight track
For a wind angle to the track of βw = 90° the characteristic wind speeds have to be computed for the train speeds vtr = 120 km/h; 160 km/h; 200 km/h; 250 km/h; 300 km/h; vtr,max for both the flat ground and the embankment configuration.
In addition, for the maximum train operating speed, the characteristic wind speeds shall be computed for the angles βw = 80°; 70°; 60°; 50°; 40°; 30°; 20° for both flat ground and embankment configurations. For the embankment configuration an additional computation at βw = 10° is needed.
G.7.4.2. Vehicle in a curve
To account for the vehicle running in curves the values ΔQ/Q0,curve for the flat ground configuration shall be computed for aq= 0,5 m/s2 and 1 m/s2 at train speeds of vtr = 250 km/h, vtr = 300 km/h and vtr = vtr,max, with unfavourable conditions for aq.
G.8. Required Documentation
The determination and assessment of the CWC require detailed documentation, which indicates and explains the underlying parameters, the assumptions made and the conclusions drawn. The major steps when processing and assessing the CWC, as well as the conformity to annex G, shall be clearly demonstrated.
As a result the following documents shall be provided:
— |
Test Report of Wind Tunnel Tests (cf. to chapter G.3), |
— |
Test Report of Running Tests according to clause 5.6 of EN14363:2004 for the model verification, |
— |
Report for the Modelling of the Vehicle Dynamics with Verification (see chapter G.5), |
— |
Report about the Processing of the Characteristic Wind Curves (see chapter G.6 & G.7), |
— |
Summary Report with Assessment of Characteristic Wind Curves (see chapter G.8), |
ANNEX H
Front and rear lamps
H.1. Definitions
Headlamp
a white light on the front end of a train, intended to provide visual warning of an approaching train, and to illuminate lineside signs.
Marker lamp
a white light on the front end of a train, intended to indicate the presence of a train.
Tail lamp
a red light on the rear end of a train, intended to indicate the presence of a train.
Combined lamp
Combined lamps (e.g. lamps capable of different functions) shall be permitted only where the requirements for the individual lamp functions are achieved.
CIE(1931) standard colourimetric system (x, y, z)
A system for specifying colour by determining the tristimulus values of the spectral power distribution of a coloured light using the set of reference colour stimuli [X], [Y], [Z] and the three CIE colour matching functions x(λ), y(λ), z(λ), adopted by the CIE in 1931 (See CIE Publication No. 15.2-1986).
H.2. Front Lamps
(a) Headlamps
Each headlamp shall provide a source of white light 170mm in diameter. It is permissible to use non-circular headlamps in which case the minimum lit area shall be 22 000 mm2 with a minimum dimension of 110 mm.
Photometric requirements
The luminous intensities of headlamps, measured along the centre line of the headlamp, shall be as shown in Tables H1.
The required luminous intensities shall be reached when installed on the vehicle.
Table H1.
Luminous intensities for headlamps
|
Dimmed head lamp |
Full-beam head lamp |
Luminous intensity (cd) along centre line |
12 000 -16 000 |
> 40 000 |
Luminous intensity (cd) at all angles within 5° on either side of the centre line in the horizontal plane |
> 3 000 |
> 10 000 |
Assessment is defined in clause H.4 section (b).
(b) Marker Lamps
Each marker lamp shall provide a source of white light at least 170 mm in diameter. It is permissible to use non-circular marker lamps in which case the minimum lit area shall be 22 000 mm2 with a minimum dimension of 110 mm.
Photometric requirements
The luminous intensities of marker lamps, measured along the centre line of the marker lamp, shall be as shown in Tables H2 and H3 below.
Table H2.
Luminous Intensities for Lower Marker Lamps
|
Dimmed lower marker lamp |
Full lower marker lamp |
Luminous intensity (cd) along centre line |
Minimum 100 |
300-700 |
Luminous intensity (cd) at 45° on either side of the centre line in the horizontal plane |
20-40 |
Table H3.
Luminous Intensities for Upper Marker Lamps
|
Dimmed upper marker lamp |
Full upper marker lamp |
Luminous intensity along the centre line (cd) |
Minimum 50 |
150-350 |
Assessment is defined in clause H.4 section (b).
(c) Colourimetric and Spectral requirements
The colour of light emitted by head and marker lamps shall comply with the requirements of CIE S004/E-2001, as shown in table H4:
Table H4.
Colour range intersection points
Colour of light |
CIE(1931) colour coordinates of the intersection points |
||||
White Class A |
Intersection point |
I |
J |
K |
L |
x |
0,300 |
0,440 |
0,440 |
0,300 |
|
y |
0,342 |
0,432 |
0,382 |
0,276 |
Assessment is defined in clause H.4 section (a).
Spectral radiation distribution of light
The spectral radiation distribution of the light used is substantially responsible for the colour recognition of signs. All illuminants shall ensure that there are no significant distortion of colour in colour recognition of signs and other objects.
In order to demonstrate compliance with this requirement, a ratio kcolour shall apply between the entire visible light range and the individual spectral colour ranges to be considered.
The ratio kcolour shall be determined according to the equation below:
S(λ) |
– |
spectral energy distribution (by spectral measurement) as the spectral radiance in W/m2 sr or as the spectral distribution of the irradiance in W/m2 |
V(λ) |
– |
relative spectral luminosity [relative luminous efficiency of a monochromatic radiation of wavelength λ] |
λcolour |
– |
wavelength range of the entire colour range to be considered (see table H5) |
λtotal |
– |
wavelength range of the entire visible colour range 380-780 nm |
Table H5.
Colour ratios
|
λcolour [nm] |
kcolour |
kred |
610-780 |
≥ 0,14 |
korange |
560-660 |
≥ 0,50 |
kyellow |
505-780 |
≥ 0,90 |
kblue |
380-505 |
≤ 0,10 |
H.3. Rear Lamps
(a) Tail lamps
Each lamp shall provide a source of red light at least 170 mm in diameter. It is permissible to use non-circular tail lamps in which case the minimum lit area shall be 22 000 mm2 with a minimum dimension of 110 mm.
(b) Photometric requirements
The luminous intensities of tail lamps, measured along the centre line of the tail lamp, shall be as shown in Table H6 below.
Table H6.
Luminous Intensities for Tail Lamps
|
Tail lamp |
Luminous intensity (cd) along centre line |
15-40 |
Luminous intensity (cd) at 7.5° on either side of the centre line in the horizontal plane |
Minimum 10 |
Luminous intensity (cd) at 2.5° on either side of the centre line in the vertical plane |
Minimum 10 |
Assessment is defined in clause H.4 section (b).
(c) Colourimetric requirements
The colour of light emitted by tail lamps shall comply with the requirements of CIE S004/E-2001, as shown in the table H7 below:
Table H7.
Colour range intersection points (assessment is defined in clause H.4 section (a)).
Colour of light |
CIE(1931) colour coordinates of the intersection points |
||||
Red |
Intersection point |
A |
B |
C |
D |
x |
0,690 |
0,705 |
0,705 |
0,720 |
|
y |
0,295 |
0,295 |
0,280 |
0,280 |
H.4. Conformity type testing of interoperable constituent
(a) Colourimetric tests
These tests shall determine the colour of light emitted by the lamp over the range of angles for which luminous intensities are specified, and shall apply over the whole of the lit area of the lamp.
Test requirements
The colourimetric tests shall be carried out with at least one lamp of each type, at the rated voltage for each.
The colourimetric tests shall be carried out in a suitable darkroom, with controlled ambient temperature within the range 20 ± 2 °C.
Testing of the colour of the light emitted by the lamps shall be carried out with a precision colourimeter for absolute measurement. CIE Publication No. 15.2 contains information and recommendations on colourimetric practices and formulae, and on the calculation of tristimulus values and chromaticity coordinates. ISO/CIE 10527 contains information on partial filtering for the required 2° field size.
The measurement system for the colourimetry shall be checked before each test with a suitably calibrated light source. The check shall be documented.
The calibration of the colourimeter and light source shall be traceable to the national standard applicable to the country in which the lamp is tested.
The colourimetric tests shall be carried out using a goniometer. The lamp shall be fixed on the goniometer and inclined horizontally and vertically around the mid-point of the lit area of the lamp.
The measurement distance between the lamp and colourimeter shall be sufficient to ensure that the detector surface is illuminated fully and uniformly without any structural detail of the light beam. This measurement distance shall be documented.
During the tests, the electrically powered lamp shall be operated at a constant test voltage equal to the rated voltage for the lamp. In order to obtain an accurate result, the voltage shall be measured as close to the lamp as possible. The test voltage and current shall be documented.
Electrical light sources shall be aged before being submitted for the tests, and stabilised directly before the tests, for the required periods shown in Table H8.
Table H8.
Ageing and stabilisation period for different light source types
Light source type |
Ageing period |
Stabilisation period |
Incandescent lamp |
1 % of the nominal service life, but at least 1 hour |
15 minutes |
LED |
50 hours |
1 hour |
Halogen metal vapour lamp |
100 hours |
30 minutes |
Mercury vapour high pressure lamp |
100 hours |
20 minutes |
Sodium vapour high pressure lamp |
100 hours |
20 minutes |
(b) Photometric tests
These tests shall determine the luminous intensity of light emitted by the lamp over the range of angles for which luminous intensities are specified, and shall apply over the whole of the lit area of the lamp.
The photometric tests shall be carried out with at least one lamp of each type, at the rated voltage for each.
The photometric tests shall be carried out in a suitable darkroom, with controlled ambient temperature within the range 20 ± 2 °C.
The luminous intensity shall be measured with a photometer with a measuring range of at least 1 to 100 000 cd.
The f1 error of the photometer with reference to the V(λ) spectral response, according to CIE Publication No. 69 shall not exceed 1,5 %. The photometer shall have a device or devices to reduce internal reflections without covering parts of the detector surface.
The measurement system for the photometry shall be checked before each test with a suitably calibrated light source. The check shall be documented.
The calibration of the photometer and light source shall be traceable to the national standard applicable to the country in which the lamp is tested.
The photometric tests shall be carried out using a suitably calibrated goniometer. The lamp shall be fixed on the goniometer and inclined horizontally and vertically around the mid-point of the lit area of the lamp.
The measurement distance between the lamp and photometer shall be sufficient to ensure that the detector surface is illuminated fully and uniformly without any structural detail of the light beam. This measurement distance shall be documented.
During the tests, the electrically powered lamp shall be operated at a constant test voltage equal to the rated voltage for the lamp. In order to obtain an accurate result, the voltage shall be measured as close to the lamp as possible. The test voltage and current shall be documented.
Electrical light sources shall be aged before being submitted for the tests, and stabilised directly before the tests, for the required periods shown in Table H8.
Where the photometric tests are conducted on light-unit only, a type-test shall be carried out in the as-installed condition to account for variations in power supply, lenses and protective covers.
ANNEX I
Information required to appear in the ‘register of rolling stock’
I.1. General information
The register of rolling stock shall contain the following sections.
A. |
Definition of the scope |
B. |
Names of parties involved |
C. |
Conformity assessment and suitability for use process |
D. |
Characteristics of the rolling stock |
E. |
Safety critical maintenance data |
I.2. Section A: Definition of the scope of the register of rolling stock
This section of the register contains the identification and the intended use of the rolling stock covered by this register. This section shall contain the following information.
Type identification (unique characteristic by which the vehicles covered by this register can be recognised)
Type designation (name of the rolling stock, optional)
Vehicle Identification (alphanumeric identification code)
Class (class 1 or 2)
Type (trainset, EMU, DMU, power head, electric or diesel locomotive, or coach, for electric locomotive P > 4 500 kW or P < 4 500 kW)
Defined Formations, in the case of single vehicles, the defined formations in which the vehicle is certificated to run, shall also be listed.
Field of application (for trainsets: possibility to couple trainsets together; for vehicles: rules to be applied to compose interoperable trains using this vehicle)
I.3. Section B: Names of parties involved
This section of the register contains identification of the parties that are or have been involved in the design, manufacturing and operation of the rolling stock subsystem and of the on-board assemblies of other subsystems. It shall state the identity of each of the following parties.
When more than one party has been responsible for one role, the register shall state each party and the apportionment of the responsibilities between them.
Keeper (The party, who being the owner or having the right to dispose of it, exploits a vehicle economically in a permanent manner as a means of transport (COTIF, Annex D ‘CUV’ Article 2)
Owner
Railway undertaking responsible for the technical management of the rolling stock.
Railway Undertaking responsible for the operation of their rolling stock.
Main contractor or manufacturer(s) or his authorised representative (parties, whose activities contribute to fulfil the essential requirements of the TSI). It concerns the parties
— |
responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem integration) |
— |
other companies only involved only in a part of the subsystem project (performing for example design, assembly or installation of the subsystem). |
I.4. Section C: Conformity assessment
This section of the register contains the documentation of the conformity assessment.
Certificate of conformity (Notified body, date and identification)
Authorisation for placing in service (National Authority, date and identification)
TSI (version or versions of the TSI that have been applied)
Items that shall be verified by in service experience and the arrangements that have been made to cover these items
I.5. Section D: Characteristics of the rolling stock
This section of the register contains three subsections:
— |
Section D.1: the rolling stock subsystem, |
— |
Section D.2: the onboard assembly of the Control-Command and Signalling subsystem, |
— |
Section D.3: the on-board assembly of the energy subsystem. |
I.5.1. Subsection D.1 for the rolling stock subsystem
This subsection of the rolling stock register shall contain
— |
Results of the conformity assessment for all characteristics in Table E.1 of Annex E where there is an accepted derogation or where there is a choice of values. This information shall be given in the format of Table I.1. |
— |
Results of the conformity assessment for all characteristics on which this TSI contains specific cases (all characteristics in chapter 7.3). This information shall be given in the format of Table I.1. |
— |
Result of the conformity assessment for requirements in Annex L (National Rules) of the High speed rolling stock TSI, if applicable. This information shall be given in the format of Table I.1. |
— |
Characteristics of rolling stock as set out in Table I.1. |
— |
References to documents that are referred to in the high speed rolling stock TSI:, 4.2.1.1a) and 4.2.7.9.1 Degraded modes, 4.2.7.5 Lifting/rescue procedures |
— |
Reference(s) to certificate(s) of interoperability constituents that are to be used in the rolling stock subsystem |
I.5.2. Subsection D.2 for the control-command and signalling subsystem
This subsection of the rolling stock register shall contain the information mandated by other TSIs in relation to the control-command and signalling subsystem on board of rolling stock. The format of this information shall comply with the format set out in Table I.1.
I.5.3. Subsection D.3 for the energy subsystem
This subsection of the rolling stock register shall contain the information mandated by other TSIs in relation to the energy subsystem on board of rolling stock. The format of this information shall comply with the format set out in Table I.1.
I.6. Section E: Maintenance data
The entity responsible for the rolling stock and the management of the technical file
The reference to the maintenance documentation as defined in clause 4.2.10.2.2 of this TSI
The safety critical data relating to the maintenance (see clause 4.2.10.2.2)
Table I.1
Entries in subsection D.1 of the rolling stock register
Clause |
Characteristic of the rolling stock |
Type, value or option |
4.2.1.1.b |
Maximum service speed of trainsets |
Maximum speed |
4.2.2.2 |
End couplers |
Type of end coupler |
4.2.2.4.1 |
Passenger step (pending requirements of PRM TSI) |
Platform heights for which the rolling stock is compatible |
4.2.3.1 |
Kinematic gauge |
Kinematic vehicle gauge used |
4.2.3.2 |
Static axle load |
Value |
4.2.3.3.2 |
Axle bearing health monitoring |
Shielded y/n Class 2: equipped with on board y/n |
4.2.3.4.3 a) |
Vertical dynamic wheel load |
Value |
4.2.3.4.5 |
Design for vehicle stability |
Speed Conicity range or presence of independently rotating wheels |
4.2.3.5 |
Maximum train length |
Value |
4.2.3.6 4.2.4.7 |
Maximum gradients Brake performance on steep gradients |
Value |
4.2.3.7 |
Minimum curve radius |
Value |
4.2.4.1 |
Minimum braking performance |
Braking curve and means of braking to achieve performance |
4.2.6.1 |
Environmental conditions |
Climatic zone |
4.2.6.2.2 |
Aerodynamic loads on passengers on a platform |
Platform height used for assessment |
4.2.7.2 |
Fire safety |
Category A or B fire safety |
4.2.8.3.1.1 |
Energy supply |
Values of voltage and frequency |
4.2.8.3.2 |
Max. power and maximum current that it is permissible to draw from the catenary |
Values |
ANNEX J
Windscreen properties
J.1. Optical Properties
The windscreen, as orientated and installed in the driving cab, shall have minimal Distortion of Vision over the whole of the vision area.
J.1.1. Optical Distortion
Simple distortions of vision when measured using the method set out in ECE R 43 A3/9.2, or in Section 5.3 of ISO 3538:1997 shall not exceed the following values:
(a) |
max. 2,5 minutes of arc in the Primary Vision Area; |
(b) |
max. 6,5 minutes of arc in the Secondary Vision Area; |
There shall not be any noticeable discontinuities of the projected lines within the Primary and Secondary Vision Areas.
Figure J.1
Windscreen Areas
Key
1 |
Outside |
Area A |
Primary Vision Area |
2 |
Inside |
Area B |
Secondary Vision Area |
|
|
Area C |
Peripheral Area |
The four points W, X, Y and Z are the result of the crossing between the outside of the windscreen and the virtual lines between the driver’s eyes and the high or low signals.
These points shall be connected each other by a line as in the diagram above.
J.1.2. Secondary Images
The windscreen when installed in the cab shall not cause Secondary Image Separations that may cause confusion or distraction to the driver.
The permissible angle between primary and secondary images in the installed position shall not exceed:
— |
15 minutes of arc for the primary vision area |
— |
25 minutes of arc for the secondary vision area |
J.1.3. Haze
The maximum value of haze shall not exceed 2 % when measured as set out ECE R 43 A3/4.
J.1.4. Transmittance
The primary and secondary vision areas of the windscreen shall have a Visual Transmission of more than 65 % in the installed position, as measured in accordance with ECE R 43 A3/9.1 or with clause 5.1 of ISO 3538:1997
J.1.5. Chromaticity
Requirements related to chromaticity remain an open point
J.2. Structural requirements
J.2.1. Impacts
The resistance of the front windows to projectiles shall be assessed as follows:
A cylindrical projectile shall be fired at the front window. The projectile shall be constructed as shown in Figure J.2. If the projectile sustains permanent damage after impact it shall be replaced.
For the test, the front window shall be fixed in a frame of the same construction as that mounted on the vehicle.
The temperature of the window during the tests shall be between +15 °C and +35 °C. The projectile is assumed to impact at right angles to the window or alternatively the test window can be mounted at the same angle to the track as it is mounted in the vehicle.
The projectile's impact velocity shall be determined by:
Vp |
= |
Vmax+ 160 km/h |
Vp |
= |
Velocity of the projectile in km/h on impact |
Vmax |
= |
Maximum velocity of the trainset in km/h |
The test result shall be deemed satisfactory if:
— |
the projectile does not break through the front window; |
— |
the window remains in its frame. |
Figure J.2
Diagram of projectile
Key
1 |
Section A-A |
4 |
Milled surface of hemispheric tip (1 mm) |
2 |
Extremity of steel projectile |
5 |
Projectile in aluminium alloy |
3 |
Material may be removed for adjustment purposes |
|
The mass of the projectile shall be 1 000 g. |
J.2.2. Spalling
The driver shall be protected from spalling.
The spalling test shall be verified during the tests of impacts of projectiles set out in clause 4.2.2.7 c) of this TSI. A sheet of aluminium of maximal thickness 0,15 mm and of dimension 500 mm by 500 mm shall be placed vertically behind the sample tested at a distance of 500 mm and in the direction of travel of the projectile. The spalling test shall be deemed satisfactory if the aluminium sheet is not perforated.
ANNEX K
Coupler
K.1. Schematic of the coupler
The towing coupler shall comply with the dimensions in Figure K1 but its shape is permitted to be different
Figure K1
Dimensions of the coupler
The centre of the end coupler shall be at 1 025 mm +15 mm/–5 mm above running surface, for an empty vehicle in running order condition and with new wheels
K.2. Towing coupler used for recovery and rescue
K.2.1. Definition of terms
Recovery vehicles (locomotives, trains) are denoted by the term ‘recovery vehicle’.
The rescue, emergency and recovery coupler on the recovery vehicle covered in this annex is denoted by the term ‘towing coupler’.
The automatic coupler system shall be geometrically and functionally compatible with a ‘Type 10 latch system automatic centre buffer coupler’ (also known as the ‘Scharfenberg’ system) and referred to herein as an ‘automatic coupler’.
The term ‘draw hook’ refers to a draw hook of shape and dimensions conforming to clause 4.2.2.1.2 of the Freight Wagon TSI 2005; the reference height above rail level (ARL) is defined as being 1 025 mm +15 mm/–5 mm for an empty vehicle in running order conditions and with new wheels.
The term ‘half coupler’ is adopted to describe the brake couplers to be connected to the air pipes between the vehicle and the rescue coupler (main brake pipe and main air pipe).
K.2.2. General conditions
K.2.2.1. Speeds
Permissible speeds when recovering trains are:
|
minimum speed |
recommended speed |
Pulled |
30 km/h |
100 km/h |
Pushed |
30 km/h |
|
K.2.2.2. Brakes
The train to be recovered shall be connected to the brake pipe of the recovery vehicle and braked from there.
K.2.2.3. General Pneumatic connection
All trains shall be able to be moved safely and braked when connecting the main brake pipe only. It is permissible to connect the main air reservoir pipe only when a specific procedure defined by the operator of the recovered vehicle allows it. Where the main air reservoir pipe cannot be connected operational rules shall be provided to continue to assure safety of passengers.
K.2.2.4. Coupling Process
The recovery vehicle shall come to a complete halt in front of the vehicle being recovered. The recovery vehicle shall then proceed at a maximum speed of 2 km/h to engage the two couplers.
K.2.2.5. Uncoupling conditions
It is permissible to uncouple manually or automatically
K.2.3. Towing a train fitted with an automatic coupler by means of a towing coupler
K.2.3.1. General conditions
When a train fitted with an automatic coupler is hauled by a motive power unit fitted with buffing and draw gear components and a towing coupler, the towing coupler shall, as a minimum, be able to withstand the following static forces without permanent deformation:
— |
tensile force at the coupler 300 kN |
— |
compressive force at the coupler 250 kN |
K.2.3.2. Coupling conditions
Mechanical connection
The towing coupler shall be designed to be installed by two people in a maximum time of 15 minutes, its maximum weight shall not exceed 45kgs.
The mechanical connection between the train's coupler and the towing coupler fitted to the recovery vehicle shall be established automatically.
It shall be ensured that the towing coupler fitted to a vehicle with buffing and draw gear components is able to be connected to the automatic coupler on the other vehicle, to allow train running on horizontal curves of R ≥ 150 m or on vertical curves of R ≥ 600 m on a crest or R ≥ 900 m on a hollow (see High Speed Infrastructure TSI 2006 clause 4.2.25.3)
Readiness for hauling shall be brought about by hooking the towing coupler onto the draw hook of the recovery vehicle and fastening it to the draw-hook itself.
The towing coupler shall be fastened in such a way that, whilst it cannot be worked loose by any relative motion occurring, it shall not impair the freedom of movement of the draw hook.
The towing coupler shall be provided with all necessary parts for installation and no additional tools shall be needed for installation.
Once the towing coupler has been installed on the draw hook of the vehicle,
— |
the towing coupler shall be able to be centred on the draw hook by hand |
— |
the draw hook's normal horizontal play shall not be impaired |
— |
the draw hook's normal vertical play shall not be impaired |
— |
the vertical fastening on the towing coupler shall be easy to handle |
— |
any tilting mechanism shall be turned off. |
In order not to exceed the towing couplers mechanical strength, the difference in the centre heights of the towing coupler and the coupler on the train being recovered shall not exceed 75 mm.
Pneumatic connection
The air pipes (main brake pipe and main air pipe) shall be connected as follows:
The air hoses on the recovery vehicle shall be joined to the corresponding air connectors on the coupler by means of the half couplers (see Figure K2).
It shall be ensured in the process that the air pipes are free to move about their longitudinal axes.
Figure K2
Air-pipe connection between coupler and recovery motive power unit
It is permissible to equip Class 1 and Class 2 when fitted with automatic couplers, with additional air pipe connectors for a direct connection of the air pipes to the recovery vehicle.
K.2.4. Towing a train fitted with a draw hook by means of a towing coupler
K.2.4.1. General conditions
All requirements requested in previous section K.2.3 shall be applicable, taking into account the following modifications resulting from the towing coupler installation.
K.2.4.2. Coupling conditions
Mechanical connection
The mechanical connection between the rescued train’s towing coupler and the automatic coupler fitted to the recovery vehicle shall be established automatically.
Pneumatic connections
The air pipes (main brake pipe and main air pipe) shall be connected via the corresponding air ducts. It is not essential to pneumatically connect the uncoupling lines.
ANNEX L
Aspects not specified in the High Speed Rolling Stock TSI and for which notification of national rules is required
General |
Additional requirements for rolling stock having a maximum speed higher than 351 km/h (clause 1.1) |
Mechanical parts |
Bogies: design, fabrication and approval — Steel grade used — Resistance — Vibrations dampening, Critical twisting resonance (traction unit) |
Bogie curving behaviour |
Wheelset: design, fabrication and approval — Defects of rolling contact permitted in operation |
Equipment attached to vehicle bodies, bogie frames and axle boxes and its attachment requirements |
Resistance to fatigue loads |
Certification processes for non destructive testing |
Suitability for gravity shunting: couplers, passing over shunting bumps, resistance to shunting shocks |
Identification of rail vehicles (clause 4.2.7.15) |
Passenger steps (clause 4.2.2.4.1) |
Hot axle boxes detection system: alarm levels (clause 4.2.3.3.2) |
Safety, health an ergonomic requirements for driver seats (4.2.2.6) |
Windscreen chromaticity requirements |
Dynamic Behaviour |
Limitation of the quasi static guiding force Yqst |
Braking |
Pneumatic brake: characteristics (including automatic immobilisation in case of coupling rupture) |
Other brake types |
Use of composite brake blocks |
Brake pad/brake disc friction coefficient reduction due to dampness (Annex P) |
Traction/Energy |
Electrical protection of the train: circuit breaker location, damages downstream from the circuit breaker of the train |
Control of the pantographs, backup mechanism for rising the pantograph in the absence of air in the main tank |
Protection of the catenary: from hot exhaust gases |
Diesel and other thermal traction systems |
Quality of fuel for Diesel and other thermal traction systems |
Refuelling equipment (clause 4.2.9.8) |
Control-Command and interfaces with signalling |
Interference generated on the signalling system and the telecommunications network: (clause 4.2.6.6.1) |
Equipment for driver only operation |
Safety |
Safety integrity levels (SIL) for safety related functions |
Safety and health of persons (Already covered by EU Dir. 58/2001?) |
(A) Instruction to passengers for a safety-conscious behaviour Indication on evacuation procedures and use of emergency exits in adequate languages |
Food preparation and storage (*) |
Electromagnetic compatibility with pacemakers (*) |
Internal crash worthiness |
Fire safety |
Measures to prevent fire (clause 4.2.7.2.2) |
Environment |
Exhaust gases of thermal engines |
Use of prohibited or restricted materials and products (asbestos, PCB, CFC, etc.) |
Operation |
Vehicle Recovery |
Aerodynamics |
Effects of crosswinds for class 1 tilting trains and class 2 trains (clause 4.2.6.3) |
Aerodynamic effects on ballast (clause 4.2.3.11) |
Assessment |
Assessment of Maintenance Arrangements: Conformity Assessment Procedure (Annex F clause F.4) |
(*) Health issues that are not railway specific but need specification.
ANNEX M
In service limits of the geometric dimensions of wheels and wheelsets
Table M.1.
Dimensions for 1 435 mm track gauge
Designation |
Wheel diameter D (mm) |
Minimum value (mm) |
Maximum value (mm) |
Requirements linked to subsystem |
|||
Distance between flange contact faces (SR) SR = AR+Sd(left wheel)+Sd(right wheel) |
≥ 840 |
1 410 |
1 426 |
< 840 and ≥ 330 |
1 415 |
1 426 |
|
Back to back distance (AR) |
≥ 840 |
1 357 |
1 363 |
< 840 and ≥ 330 |
1 359 |
1 363 |
|
Requirements linked to interoperability constituent wheel |
|||
Width of the rim (BR+Burr) |
≥ 330 |
133 |
145 |
Thickness of the flange (Sd) |
≥ 840 |
22 |
33 |
< 840 and ≥ 330 |
27,5 |
33 |
|
Height of the flange (Sh) |
≥ 760 |
27,5 |
36 |
< 760 and ≥ 630 |
30 |
36 |
|
< 630 and ≥ 330 |
32 |
36 |
|
Face of flange (qR) |
≥ 330 |
6,5 |
|
Wheel tread defects, e.g. wheel flats, shelled treads, cracks, grooves, cavities etc |
National rules apply until EN is published |
The dimension AR is measured at the top surface of the rail. The dimensions AR and SR shall be complied with in laden and tare conditions and for loose wheelsets. For specific vehicles smaller tolerances within the above limits may be specified by the vehicle supplier.
Figure M.1.
Symbols
Table M.2.
Dimensions for 1 520 and 1 524 mm track gauges
Designation |
Wheel diameter (mm) |
Gauge (mm) |
Minimum value (mm) |
Maximum value (mm) |
Requirements linked to subsystem |
||||
Distance between outside surfaces of the flange (SR) |
≥ 840 |
1 520 |
1 487 |
1 509 |
1 524 |
1 487 |
1 514 |
||
Distance between inner faces of the flange (AR) |
≥ 840 |
1 520 |
1 437 |
1 443 |
1 524 |
1 442 |
1 448 |
||
Requirements linked to interoperability constituent wheel |
||||
Width of the rim (BR) |
≥ 840 |
1 520 |
130 |
145 (1) |
1 524 |
134 |
145 (1) |
||
Thickness of the flange (Sd) |
≥ 840 |
|
20 |
33 36 (2) |
Height of the flange (Sh) |
≥ 840 |
|
28 |
36 |
Face of flange (QR) |
≥ 840 |
|
6,5 |
|
Dimensions above are indicated as a function of the height of the upper rail level and shall be met by empty or loaded rolling stock. |
(1) Burr value included
(2) Only allowed when AR is 1 442
ANNEX M I
Not used
ANNEX M II
Not used
ANNEX M III
Not used
ANNEX M IV
Seals for the toilet discharge system connections
Fig. M IV.1
|
A [mm] |
B [mm] |
C[mm] |
Seals 3″ |
94,45 |
76,20 |
6,35 |
Seals 1″ |
39,69 |
26,98 |
6,35 |
General tolerances +/– 0,1
Material: Elastomer, faeces-resistant e.g. FPM (fluo rubber)
Fig. M IV.2.
3″ Evacuation connection and 1″ flushing connection (outer parts)
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
3″ Coupler |
92,20 |
104 |
55 |
7,14 |
4 |
82,55 |
133,3 |
1″ Coupler |
37,24 |
40,50 |
37,50 |
7,14 |
2,4 |
44,45 |
65 |
General tolerances +/– 0,1
Material: stainless steel
ANNEX M V
Inlet connections for water tanks
Fig. M V.1
ANNEX M VI
Connections for the toilet discharge system on rolling stock
Fig. M VI.1.
3″ Evacuation nozzle (Inner part)
Fig. M VI.2.
1″ Optional flushing connection for the toilet tank (Inner part)
ANNEX N
Measuring Conditions for Noise
N.1. Deviations from EN ISO 3095:2005
N.1.1. Stationary noise
The measurement of stationary noise shall be made according to EN ISO 3095:2005 with the following deviations (see Table N1).
Normal operation is defined by performance at an external temperature of 20 °C. Design parameters for forcing the operation in order to simulate 20 °C conditions are to be provided by the manufacturer.
Table N1
Stationary noise, deviations from EN ISO 3095:2005
Clause (EN ISO 3095:2005) |
Subject |
Deviation (marked in bold, italic characters) |
6.2.3 |
Microphone positions, measurements on stationary vehicles |
Measurements shall be made according to EN ISO 3095:2005 Annex A, Figure A.1 with at least six microphones placed each side of the train. If regular spacing is not applied it is necessary to include a surface weighting in the energy average according to the following formula:
where Si= area of measurement surface i, LpAeq,i = measured level at point i, N = total number of measurement points, Stotal = total measurement surface area. |
6.3.1 |
Vehicle conditions |
Fouling on grilles, filters and fans shall be removed before the measurements. |
7.5.1 |
General |
The measuring time is to be 60 s. |
7.5.2 |
Coaches, wagons and electric power units |
All equipment that can operate with the vehicle stationary, including the main traction equipment where relevant, but excluding the brake air compressor, shall be operating. The auxiliary equipment shall be operated at normal load. |
7.5.3.1 |
Power units with internal combustion engines |
Engine idling unloaded, fan at normal speed, auxiliary equipment with normal load, brake air compressor not operating. |
7.5.3.2 |
Power units with internal combustion engines |
This clause is not relevant for Diesel locomotives and DMU's |
7.5.1 |
Measurements on stationary vehicles, general |
The sound level of the stationary noise is the energy average of all measured values taken at the measurement points according to EN ISO 3095:2005 Annex A, Figure A.1. |
N.1.2. Starting noise
The measurement of starting noise shall be made according to EN ISO 3095:2005 with the following deviations (see Table N2).
Normal operation is defined by performance at an external temperature of 20 °C. Design parameters for forcing the operation to simulate 20 °C conditions are provided by the manufacturer.
Table N2
Starting noise, deviations from EN ISO 3095:2005
Paragraph (EN ISO 3095: 2005) |
Subject |
Deviation (marked in bold, italic characters) |
6.1.2 |
Meteorological Conditions |
Measurements on accelerating vehicles shall be made only if the rail is dry. |
6.3.1 |
Vehicle conditions |
Fouling on grilles, filters and fans shall be removed before the measurements. |
6.3.3 |
Doors, windows, auxiliary equipment |
Tests on accelerating trains shall be performed with all auxiliary equipment operating at normal load. The sound emission of brake air compressors shall not be taken into account. |
7.3.1 |
General |
Tests have to be performed with maximum tractive effort without wheel spin and without macro slip. If the train under test does not comprise a fixed formation, the load has to be defined. It shall be typical of the normal service. |
7.3.2 |
Trains with an individual power unit |
Tests on accelerating trains shall be performed with all auxiliary equipment operating at normal load. The sound emission of the brake air compressors shall not be taken into account. |
N.1.3. Pass-by Noise
Paragraph (EN ISO 3095:2005) |
Subject |
Deviation (marked in bold, italic characters) |
6.2 |
Microphone position |
There will be no track in-between the running track and the microphone |
6.3.1 |
Vehicle conditions |
Fouling on grilles, filters and fans shall be removed before the measurements. |
7.2.3 |
Test procedure |
A tachometer shall be used such that the speed is sufficiently accurately measured for pass-by, with train speed not in the range ±3 % of the stated test speed to be correctly identified as being outside that range and rejected. Minimum tractive effort to maintain a constant speed shall be maintained for at least 60 s before, and during, the pass-by measurement |
N.1.4. Reference track for pass-by noise
The specifications of the reference track were studied only to allow the assessment of rolling stock against pass-by noise limits. This section specifies neither the design nor the maintenance nor the operating conditions of ‘normal’ tracks, which are not ‘reference’ tracks.
Approval of the reference track shall be made according to EN ISO 3095:2005 with the following deviations.
— |
The rail roughness shall lie below the limit spectrum as defined in Figure N1. This limiting curve replaces the specification of EN ISO 3095:2005, Paragraph 6.4.2 (Figure 4), Annex C ‘Procedure for determining the rail roughness limit spectrum’. Annex D ‘Rail roughness measurement specifications’, is applicable only in paragraphs D.1.2 (direct acquisition method) and D.2.1 (Processing of roughness data — Direct measurement), with the following deviations and D4 (data presentation):
|
— |
These methods, used in the NOEMIE project, have been shown to produce consistent results in the case of tracks fulfilling the proposed rail roughness limits. However, any other available and proven direct method, which can produce comparable results, can be used. |
— |
The dynamic behaviour of the reference track (test track) shall be described by the vertical and lateral ‘track decay rates (TDRs)’, which quantify the attenuation of rail vibration with distance along the track. The method of measurement used in the NOEMIE project is presented in section N.2. It showed its ability to properly discriminate the track dynamic characteristics. The use of an equivalent track characterisation measurement method is also permitted, if available and proven. In that case, the track vertical and lateral decay rates of the test track shall be shown to be equivalent to those of the track type mentioned in this TSI, measured in accordance with the specification sheet presented in section N.2. The decay rates of the reference track shall lie above the lower limits given in Figure N2. |
— |
The reference track shall have consistent superstructure over a minimum length of 100 m. The measured track decay rates must pertain to 40 m on each side of the microphone position. The check of the roughness shall be carried out according EN ISO 3095: 2005. |
Figure N1
Rail roughness limit spectrum of the reference track
Figure N2
Vertical and lateral decay rate lower limit spectrum of the reference track
N.2. Characterisation of the dynamic performance of the reference tracks
N.2.1. Measurement procedure
The following procedure is to be applied successively in the lateral and vertical directions, on each track site to be characterised.
Two accelerometers are secured (glued or stud) on the rail, in the middle section between two sleepers (see Figure N3):
— |
one in the vertical direction on the longitudinal axis of the rail, positioned on the rail head (preferred), or under the rail foot, |
— |
the other in the transversal direction, positioned on the external face of the railhead, |
Figure N3
captor location on the rail cross section
A measured force impulse is applied on the railhead, in each direction, with an instrumented hammer equipped with a tip of appropriate hardness to enable a good measurement of force and response in the frequency range [50; 6 000 Hz]. (A hardened steel tip is required for the higher end of the frequency range and is usually, though not always sufficient, to apply enough force for the lower end frequency range. An extra measurement with a softer tip may be required.).
The (transfer) accelerance (acceleration/force frequency response function) or mobility (velocity/force) is measured in the vertical and lateral-transverse directions for force applied in the corresponding same direction at an array of locations at various distances along the rail (defined below). It is not necessary to measure the cross-terms (vertical force to lateral response or vice versa). If analogue integration is available for the accelerometer measurement, it has been found that a better quality of measurement is achieved if the frequency response function (FRF) of mobility is recorded rather than accelerance. This produces better quality of data at low frequency, where the measured response is very small compared with the high frequency, since it reduces the dynamic range of the data before recording or digitization. An average FRF from at least 4 valid impulses shall be taken. The quality of each measured FRF (reproducibility, linearity etc.) shall be monitored using the coherence function. This shall also be recorded.
The transfer FRFs shall be made to the accelerometer mounting location from each of the locations indicated in Figure N4. The measurement locations can be divided into sets as the ‘point’ measurement location, the ‘near-field’ set and ‘far-field’ set as follows:
— |
The location index 0 is associated with the mid-point of the first sleeper bay. When the impulse is applied at this point (practically, as close to this point as possible), the point FRF is measured. |
— |
The near-field measurements are carried out by applying the impulse, starting with the point FRF, at quarter sleeper spacing up to the end of sleeper bay 2, thence at half-sleeper spacing up to the middle of sleeper bay 4 and then at each mid-sleeper position up to sleeper bay 8. |
— |
The far-field measurement use impulse locations from a distance of sleeper bay 8 from the accelerometer position outwards at the inter-sleeper positions, with the indices: 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 66, etc. as shown in Figure N4. The measurements need only be taken up to the point at which the response at all frequencies in the range becomes insignificant (with respect to the measurement noise). The coherence function provides a guide to this. Ideally, the response level in each one-third octave band shall be at least 10 dB below the level of the same band at location 0. |
Figure N4
Track decay rates — location of the excitation points
Experience has shown that the variability of the results is such that the whole decay measurement shall be repeated for another accelerometer location on the track site. A distance between the two accelerometer locations of about 10 metres is sufficient.
Since the decay rates are a function of the rail pad stiffness and rail-pad materials typically have significant temperature dependence, the temperature of the pad shall be recorded during the measurement.
N.2.2. Measurement system
Each sensor and acquisition system shall have a calibration certificate, according to the prEN ISO 17025:2000 standard (1).
The whole measurement system shall be calibrated before and after each series of measurement (and particularly in the case of a modification in the measurement system, acquisition, or measurement location).
N.2.3. Data processing
The total sound power radiated from a rail excited into vibration is the product of the radiation ratio (radiation efficiency) of the rail and the squared velocity amplitude summed over the radiating area. If both vertical and lateral waves in the rail are assumed to decay exponentially from the excitation point (wheel contact) with distance along the rail then, A(z) ≈ A(0)e-βz where β is the decay constant for the amplitude of the response, A, with distance z along the rail from the excitation point. β can be converted to a decay rate expressed as dB per metre, Δ, as:
Δ = 20log10(eβ) = 8,686β dB/m.
If A refers to the velocity response then the sound power emitted from the track is proportional to
This quantity is simply related to the decay rate, either for vertical or lateral waves, by:
|
(N2.1) |
This demonstrates the way in which the decay rate is in relation to the noise-radiation performance of the track structure. It shall be expressed as a value in dB/m for each one-third octave frequency band.
The decay rate can, in principle, be evaluated as the slope of a graph of response amplitude in dB versus the distance z. In practice however, it is better to evaluate a decay rate based on a direct estimate of the summed response:
|
(N2.2) |
where zmax is the maximum measurement distance and the sum is carried out for the response measurement locations with Δz representing the interval between the mid-distance points to the measurement locations either side. The influence of the interval taken at for the measurement at zmax should be small but is prescribed here to be symmetrical about zmax.
Thus for the response averaged in each one-third octave frequency band, the decay rate is evaluated as:
|
(N2.3) |
It is clear from this that it is immaterial whether A represents the response in terms of accelerance or mobility since these only differ by the factor 2πf, where f is the frequency. The averaging of the spectrum over one-third octave frequency bands may be carried out either before the evaluation of the decay rate for the FRFs or afterwards on the function Δ(f). Notice that accurate measurement of A(0) is important as it appears as a constant factor in the summation. In fact this is the FRF most easily measured accurately. Experience has shown that there is no significant error introduced by the fact that near-field waves are not taken into account in this simple analysis.
This method of evaluation is robust for high rates of decay but may be subject to error if the practical value of zmax truncates the response in any one-third octave frequency band before a sufficient attenuation has taken place for the summation to zmax to represent a good approximation to the infinite integral. Thus a minimum decay rate that can be evaluated for a particular value of zmax is:
|
(N2.4) |
The evaluated decay rate shall be compared with this value and if it is close to it the estimation of decay rate deemed unsafe. A value of zmax of about 40 m should be capable of evaluating a track decay rate that complies with the minimum specified in Figure N2. However, some incompliant tracks have significantly lower decay rates in some bands and to avoid the escalation of effort in measurement it may be necessary to resort to line-slope fitting for some bands. In the case of low decay rates, the response data tends to be free from some of the problems indicated above. They shall be checked by plotting them together with the measured FRF versus distance, for each one-third-octave frequency band.
N.2.4. Test report
The spatial TDR (vertical and transversal directions) shall be presented for the third-octave frequency bandwidth, in a graph following the presentation specified in EN ISO 3740:2000 (2) and IEC 60263:1982 (3) with a scale ratio between horizontal and vertical axles of 3/4, respectively for 1 octave bandwidth and a decay rate of 5 dB/m.
(1) EN ISO CEI 17025: General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, 2000.
(2) EN ISO 3740: 2000:Acoustic — Determination of sound power levels of noise sources — Guidelines for the use of basic standards.
(3) IEC 60263: Scales and sizes for plotting frequency characteristics and polar diagrams.
ANNEX O
Earth Protection of the vehicles’ metal parts
O.1. Earthing principles
All the metal parts of the vehicle:
— |
Liable to be touched by persons, or possibly by animals, and at risk of becoming a source of excessive contact voltages, as the result of a fault in the vehicles electrical installation or because of parts of the catenary becoming detached, or |
— |
Liable to lead to an accident risk as a result of the arcing of switch-gear subjected to high currents in the presence of dangerous materials, |
shall be set at the same potential as the rail through connections having resistances as specified below.
O.2. Earthing of the vehicle bodyshell
The electrical resistance between the metal parts of the rolling stock and the rail shall not exceed 0,05 ohms. These values shall be measured with a current maintained constantly at 50 A with a voltage of 50 V or less.
When the use of materials which are poor conductors of electricity, for example in pivot bearings or axles boxes, does not allow the values specified above to be obtained, the vehicles shall be provided, where applicable, with the following protective earthing connections:
|
The body to be connected to the frame at least at two different points. |
|
The frame to be connected to each bogie at least once. |
|
Each bogie shall be earthed reliably through at least one wheelset, for example, through the casing of an axle box or by means of an earthing brush. |
|
If there are no bogies, the frame shall be earthed reliably by at least one individual connection for each of the two wheelsets. |
|
Earth connections, permitted to be either bare or insulated, shall be of a flexible material that does not corrode easily, and have a minimum cross-section of 35 mm2. If materials other than copper are used, their behaviour in the event of a short circuit shall be equal to or greater than that of 35 mm2 of copper, and electrical resistance as laid down above shall not be exceeded under any operating circumstances. These connections shall be mounted in such a way as to be protected from mechanical damage. |
O.3. Earthing of the vehicle parts
All conductive elements inside the vehicle, where they might be accessible and connected to metal parts on the roof, shall be bonded to the body of the vehicle in a safe way.
O.4. Earthing of electric installations
All the electrical installations that are connected to the main power circuit, and have metal parts which are likely to be touched and are not switched under power shall have those metal parts bonded with the body of the vehicle in a safe way.
All the metal parts of a vehicle (other than those covered in the previous point) which are susceptible to be touched and, although not switched under power, risk being made live accidentally, shall be bonded in a safe way if the nominal voltage of the part concerned is greater than:
— |
50 V direct current |
— |
24 V alternating current |
— |
24 V between phases for three phase current where the neutral is not bonded and |
— |
42 V between phases for three phase current when the neutral is bonded. |
The cross-section of earthing bond is a function of current to be conducted; it shall be sized so as to guarantee the safe functioning of the circuit breakers if tripped.
O.5. Aerials
Aerials fitted outside vehicles shall either comply with the following conditions:
— |
The conductive parts of aerials shall be fully protected from catenary voltages by a protective device made of impact proof insulating material.. |
— |
Aerial systems shall be provided with a single point earth connection (aerial with static earthing); or |
— |
Where it is not possible to comply with the previous conditions an aerial fitted outside the vehicle shall be isolated, by means of high voltage capacitors connected to other over-voltage protection devices, connected to the inside of the vehicle. |
ANNEX P
Calculation method for decelerations in degraded mode and unfavourable climatic conditions
P.1. Introduction
This annex describes the procedure that shall be followed to determine the deceleration ai (m/s2) for the speed range [vi-1, vi] in the degraded conditions of case B in table 6 of clause 4.2.4.1 of this TSI and the corresponding maximum stopping distances in Table 7 of clause 4.2.4.7 of this TSI.
The deceleration ai is permitted to be determined by calculation. This annex describes the method in which every element of the degradation is validated by specific experimental tests.
Alternatively it is permitted to determine the deceleration ai directly by undertaking tests in the conditions specified for case B. The equivalent time of application shall be verified.
If the use of alternative brake components is allowed on a specific brake system, the worst braking behaviour with respect to the generation of the braking forces and their loss due to humidity shall be taken into account.
P.2. Definition of Tests
The calculation method to assess the decelerations specified in table 6 of clause 4.2.4.1 relies on 4 tests series:
— |
Series 1: dynamic tests of the train on dry rail, but with brake equipment isolations as defined for case B |
— |
Series 2: dynamic tests of the train on dry rail, all adhesion dependent brakes active and all adhesion independent brakes inactive |
— |
Series 3: dynamic tests of the train in degraded adhesion conditions, all adhesion dependent brakes active and all adhesion independent brakes inactive |
— |
Series 4: rig tests of friction materials in wet conditions |
P.2.1. Dynamic tests
P.2.1.1. Test conditions
(a) |
Series 1 emergency braking tests to validate the braking forces as of P.3.1 shall be carried out in the conditions defined for Case B in clause 4.2.4.1 of this TSI for track geometry, load, independent units of the dynamic brake or of the braking system which dissipate kinetic energy through heating the rails, distributor valves. |
(b) |
Series 2 tests shall be carried out on dry rails and in the same load conditions as series 1. |
(c) |
Series 3 tests shall be carried out in the same load conditions as series 1 and in the degraded adhesion conditions defined below: The rails shall be sprayed with an aqueous solution of concentrated detergent of 1 %. The solution shall be released in front of each wheel of the first axle under a pressure of 0,1 bar to 0,2 bar through a 8mm diameter nozzle, along the longitudinal axis of the rail, a few centimetres from both the rail and the wheel. The quantity of the liquid shall be doubled for the tests carried out at speeds higher than 160km/h by adding a second nozzle. The tests shall be conducted in average weather conditions, at moderate ambient temperatures (between 5 °C and 25 °C), and shall not be undertaken in snow. The temperature on the rail surface shall be recorded after every test and shall lie between 5 °C and 35 °C. Note: The detergent is a solution which contains fatty acids and tensid base elements which total concentration is included between 10 and 15 %, without mineral and biodegradable load. |
(d) |
For series 1, series 2 and series 3 tests, five braking tests shall be carried out starting from the initial speeds mentioned in Table P.1. The average braking distance [m] shall be determined from the five sets of distances for each of the three series. |
P.2.1.2. Dynamic test results
Table P.1
List of dynamic tests
|
Braking initial speed (km/h) |
|||
Maximum speed |
300 |
230 |
170 |
|
Series 1 tests |
S1 v0 |
S1 300 |
S1 230 |
S1 170 |
Series 2 tests |
S2 v0 |
S2 300 |
S2 230 |
S2 170 |
Series 3 tests |
S3 v0 |
S3 300 |
S3 230 |
S3 170 |
P.2.1.3. Dynamic tests for adhesion dependant brakes
Each of the series 2 and 3 tests shall be repeated five times from each initial speed as shown in table P2. The speed and distance shall be recorded for intervals not exceeding one second. The deceleration distances (s [m] for each speed interval [vi-1, vi] shall be recorded and averaged for the five tests.
Table P.2
List of average values Δs measured during the braking tests
|
Series 2 Dry conditions |
Series 3 Degraded adhesion |
||||||
Braking initial speed (km/h) |
Braking initial speed (km/h) |
|||||||
Speed interval [vi-1, vi] |
Maximun speed |
300 |
230 |
170 |
Maximun speed |
300 |
230 |
170 |
Vmax-300 |
Δs2 1 (1) |
— |
— |
— |
Δs3 1 (1) |
— |
— |
— |
300-230 |
Δs2 2 (1) |
Δs2 2 (2) |
— |
— |
Δs3 2 (1) |
Δs3 2 (2) |
— |
— |
230-170 |
Δs2 3 (1) |
Δs2 3 (2) |
Δs2 3 (3) |
— |
Δs3 3 (1) |
Δs3 3 (2) |
Δs3 3 (3) |
— |
170-0 |
Δs2 4 (1) |
Δs2 4 (2) |
Δs2 4 (3) |
Δs2 4 (4) |
Δs3 4 (1) |
Δs3 4 (2) |
Δs3 4 (3) |
Δs3 4 (4) |
Note: The first interval Δs at the beginning of the braking process (Δs2 1 (1), Δs2 2 (2), Δs2 3 (3), … Δs3 1 (1), Δs3 2 (2), …), shall be reduced by the distance covered during the equivalent time of application (te). |
P.2.2. Rig tests for determining the effects of reduced friction
Series 4 tests on the braking rig shall be performed to evaluate the efficiency loss of friction brakes in wet conditions.
If a train is equipped with several friction brake types, the rig tests shall be repeated for each type (pad, shoe …).
The tests shall be done following the process prEN 15328:2005, annexes A et B (test programmes 1 and 5 as applicable, brake applications 1 to 50). The mean friction coefficients in dry conditions μmean_dry and in humid conditions μmean_humid shall be determined, for the relevant application forces which are closest to those producing the braking forces F11i of test series 1 in the speed range [vi-1, vi] (see P.3.1).
P.3. Deceleration Calculations
P.3.1. Determination of braking forces F
The braking forces generated by the brake system are calculated using the series 1 test results. They shall be used to verify the mean braking forcesF11 i, F12 i, F2 i and wi of each type of brakes in the different speed ranges [vi-1, vi].
With:
F11 i |
= |
braking forces [kN] dependent on friction acting through the wheel/rail contact. |
F12 i |
= |
other braking forces [kN] acting through the wheel/rail contact. |
F2 i |
= |
braking forces [kN] that are independent of the wheel/rail contact. |
wi |
= |
resistance to forward movement [kN] in the speed range [vi-1, vi]. |
P.3.2. Evaluation of kw — Reduction coefficient due to degraded adhesion
The loss of braking force due to the reduced adhesion shall be calculated based on the values of Table P.2 for every speed interval [vi-1, vi] using the following formula:
,
for k = 1, …, 4
P.3.3. Evaluation of kh — Reduction coefficient due to degraded friction
The coefficient kh_i for humidity loss for every speed range [vi-1, vi] shall be evaluated using the reduced friction coefficients measured during the series 4 rig tests of clause P.2.2. This coefficient kh_i shall be calculated for each friction material and for every speed range [vi-1, vi] as follows:
Speed interval [vi-1, vi] |
Type Pad No 1 |
Type Pad No 2 if applicable |
Kh_i for Pads if applicable |
Vmax-300 |
μmean is an open point |
kh_1_Pad2 |
kh_1 = Min(kh_1_Pad1;kh_1_Pad2; …) |
300-230 |
μmean is an open point |
kh_2_Pad2 |
kh_2 = Min(kh_2_Pad1;kh_2_Pad2; …) |
230-170 |
μmean is an open point |
kh_3_Pad2 |
kh_3 = Min(kh_3_Pad1;kh_3_Pad2; …) |
170-0 |
μmean is the average value of the tests at 160 km/h with application forces which are closest to those producing the braking forces of the speed range |
kh_4_Pad2 |
kh_4 = Min(kh_4_Pad1;kh_4_Pad2; …) |
This process shall also be applied for the braking shoes to obtain the coefficient for humidity loss for the brake blocks if they exist on the train.
For class 1 trains, where the maximum speed vmax is lower or equal than 300 km/h the two first speed interval of the table are open points.
For class 2 trains, where the maximum speed vmax is higher or equal to 230km/h, the two first speed intervals are ignored.
For class 2 trains, where the maximum speed vmax is lower than 230km/h, the two first speed intervals are ignored and the speed interval [230-170] is replaced by the range [vmax -170].
P.3.4. Decelerations calculations
The ai (m/s2) values shall be calculated using the following formula in the speed range [vi-1, vi].
where:
me |
= |
equivalent mass of the vehicles (including the inertia of therotating mass) [t] resulting from the normal train load as defined in clause 4.2.4.1 of this TSI |
F11i, F12i, F2i, wi |
= |
braking forces defined in P.3.1 |
kw_i |
= |
coefficient defined in P.3.2. |
kh_i |
= |
coefficient defined in P.3.3. |
kv_i |
= |
coefficient of braking force reduction on F11i taking into account the humidity effects and the adhesion loss, that is using the minimum values of kh_i and kw_i. |
ANNEX Q
Signs indicating the box which contains the resetting equipment of the emergency alarm
Figure Q1
The resetting operation is effected by the Bern key
Figure Q2
Resetting requires the box to be opened
ANNEX R
Specific case-Gauge for Finland
FINLAND, STATIC GAUGE FIN1
R.1. General rules
1.1. The vehicle gauge determines the space where the vehicle should be inside when it is in middle position on a straight track. The reference contour (FIN1) is given in Appendix A.
1.2. To define the lowest position of the various parts of the vehicle (lower part, parts in the proximity of the flanges) in relation to the track, the displacements hereafter should be considered:
— |
Maximum wear |
— |
Flexibility of suspensions up to the buffers. For grounds which will be made clear, the flexibility of springs has to be taken into account according to the ranking of the UIC Leaflet 505-1. |
— |
Static deflection of the frame |
— |
Mounting and construction tolerances |
1.3. For the definition of the highest location of the various parts of the vehicle, the vehicle is supposed empty, not worn and with mounting and construction tolerances.
R.2. Lower part of the vehicle
The minimum height allowed for the lower parts should be increased according to Appendix B1 for vehicles able to pass over marshalling yard humps and rail brakes.
The vehicles not allowed passing over marshalling yard humps and rail brakes can have a minimum height increased according to Appendix B2.
R.3. Vehicle parts in proximity of the wheel flanges
3.1. The minimum vertical distance allowed for vehicle parts located in the vicinity of the wheel flanges, except the wheel themselves, is 55 mm from the running surface. In curves those parts should remain inside the zone occupied by the wheels.
This distance of 55 mm does not apply to the flexible parts of the sanding system or to the flexible brushes.
3.2. In exception for the point 3.1, the minimum vertical distance allowed for parts beyond end axles is 125 mm, for vehicles which are retarded by a movable, manually on the rail placed drag shoe.
3.3. The minimum distance of brake components which should come in contact with the rail can be smaller than 55 mm from the rail when the components are stationary. They should be located inside the zone between axles and even in curves remain inside the zone occupied by the wheels. The components should not affect operation on shunting devices.
R.4. Vehicle width
4.1. Transverse half-width dimensions allowed on straight track and in curve shall be reduced according to Appendix R.C.
R.5. Lower step and access doors opening outwards for coaches and multiple units
5.1. The gauge of the lower step of coaches and multiple units is given in Appendix R.D1.
5.2. The gauge in open position of access doors opening outwards on coaches and multiple units is given in Appendix R.D2.
R.6. Pantographs and non-insulated live parts on the roof
6.1. The lowered pantograph in middle position on a straight track shall not protrude out the vehicle gauge.
6.2. The raised pantograph in middle position on a straight track shall not protrude out the vehicle gauge given in Appendix R.E.
The transverse displacements of a pantograph due to oscillations and track inclination and tolerances should be separately taken into account at the time of the installation of the electric line.
6.3. If the pantograph is not above the centre of the bogie, the lateral displacement due to the curves should also be taken into account.
6.4. Non-insulated parts (25 kV) on the roof should not penetrate the zone indicated in Appendix R.E.
R.7. Rules and later instructions
7.1. Besides items R.1-R.6, the vehicles designed for the western traffic also comply with prescriptions of UIC Leaflets 505-1 or 506.
The lower part of the vehicles able to board ferries should later comply with UIC Leaflet 507 (wagons) or 569 (coaches and vans).
7.2. Besides items R.1-R.6, the vehicles designed for the traffic with Russia also comply with prescriptions of norm GOST 9238-83. In any case, the usual gauge should be complied with.
7.3. A separate regulation is used for gauging trainsets made up of vehicle with tilting body systems.
7.4. Gauges are dealt with by a separate regulation.
Appendix R.A
Vehicle gauge
Figure R.1
Vehicle gauge widening (FIN1)
Note: For rear-view mirrors, see Appendix R.D2, item 1, a separate regulation is to be applied for the adoption.
1. |
Lower part of the vehicles able to pass over marshalling humps and rail brakes. |
2. |
Lower part of the vehicles unable to pass over marshalling humps and rail brakes except for bogies of powered units, see note 3). |
3. |
Lower part of the bogies of powered units unable to pass over marshalling humps and rail brakes. |
4. |
Gauge of the vehicles able to run on lines shown in Jtt (technical specifications related to Finnish Railway’s safety standards), where the obstacle gauge has been accordingly widened. |
Appendix R.B1
Increase of the minimum height of the lower part of the vehicle able to pass over marshalling humps and rail brakes
The height of the lower part of vehicles should be increased by Eas and Eau so that:
— |
if the vehicle runs on the top of a hump, no part between bogie pivots or between end axles could penetrate the running surface of a hump the vertical curvature radius of which is 250 m; |
— |
if the vehicle runs in the concavity of the hump, no part beyond bogie pivots or beyond end axles could penetrate the gauge of rail brakes of a concavity the vertical curvature radius of which is 300 m. |
The formulae to (1) to calculate the height increase are (values in metres):
at a distance up to 1,445 m from the centreline of the track:
at a distance greater than 1,445 m from the centreline of the track:
Notation:
Eas |
= |
height increase of the lower part of the vehicle in cross sections between bogie pivots or between end axles. Eas should not be taken into account unless its value is positive; |
Eau |
= |
height increase of the lower part of the vehicle in cross sections beyond bogie pivots or beyond end axles. Eau should not be taken into account unless its value is positive; |
a |
= |
distance between bogie pivots or between end axles; |
n |
= |
distance from the cross section considered to the nearest bogie pivot (or the nearest end axle); |
h |
= |
height of the lower part of the vehicles above the running surface (see Appendix R.A). |
(1) Formulae are based on the position of a rail brake and other shunting devices of marshalling humps shown in Appendix B3.
Appendix R.B2
Increase of the minimum height of the lower part of the vehicle unable to pass over marshalling humps and rail brakes
The height of the lower part of vehicles should be increased by E’as and E’au so that:
— |
if the vehicle runs over a concave track transition, no part between bogie pivots or between end axles could penetrate the running surface of the track transition the vertical curvature radius of which is 500 m; |
— |
if the vehicle runs over a concave track transition, no part beyond bogie pivots or beyond end axles could penetrate the running surface of the track transition the vertical curvature radius of which is 500 m. |
The formulae (1) to calculate the height increase are (values in metres):
Notation:
E’as |
= |
Height increase of the lower part of the vehicle in cross sections between bogie pivots or between end axles. E’as should not be taken into account unless its value is positive. |
E’au |
= |
Height increase of the lower part of the vehicle in cross sections between bogie pivots or between end axles. E’au should not be taken into account unless its value is positive. |
a |
= |
distance between bogie pivots or between end axles; |
n |
= |
distance from the cross section considered to the nearest bogie pivot (or the nearest end axle) |
h |
= |
height of the lower part of the vehicles above the running surface (see Appendix R.A). |
(1) Formulae are based on the vehicle gauge for tracks on marshalling humps as shown in Appendix B3.
Appendix R.B3
Location of the rail brakes and other shunting devices of marshalling humps
Figure R.2
Passing tracks:
On the passing tracks of marshalling humps Rmin = 500 m, and the height of obstacle gauge above the running surface is h = 0 mm across the whole vehicle gauge width (= 1 700 mm from track centreline). The longitudinal area where h = 0 spreads from the point of 20 m before the convex area on the top of the hump to the point of 20 m after the concave area at the valley of the hump. The obstacle gauge for the marshalling yard is valid outside this area (RAMO item 2.9 and RAMO 2 Annex 2, related to the gauge of marshalling yards, and also RAMO 2 Annex 5 related to the points of crossings).
Appendix R.C
Reduction of the half-width according to the vehicle gauge FIN1, (reduction formulae)
1. General rules
The cross dimensions of the vehicles computed according to the vehicle gauge (Appendix R.A) should be decreased by the quantities Es or Eu, so that, when the vehicle is in its least favourable position (without inclination on its suspension) and on a track of radius R = 150 m, with a track gauge of 1,544 m, no part of the vehicle protrude the half-width of the vehicle gauge FIN1 by more than (36/R+k) from the track centreline.
The centreline of the vehicle gauge coincides with the track centreline, this one being inclined if the track is canted.
Reductions are calculated according to formulae given in chapter 2.
Reduction formulae (in metres)
2.1. Sections between bogie pivots or between end axles
2.2. Sections beyond bogie pivots or beyond end axles (vehicles with a overhang)
Notations:
Es, Es∞ |
= |
reduction of the gauge half-width for cross sections between bogie pivots or between end axles. Es and Es∞ should not be taken into account unless their values are positive; |
Eu, Eu∞ |
= |
reduction of the gauge half-width for cross sections beyond bogie pivots or beyond end axles. Eu and Eu∞ should not be taken into account unless their values are positive; |
a |
= |
distance between bogie pivots or between end axles (1); |
n |
= |
distance between the cross section considered and the nearest bogie pivot, or the nearest end axle or the fictional pivot if the vehicle has no fixed pivot; |
p |
= |
bogie wheelbase; |
q |
= |
is the sum of the play between the axle box and the axle itself and of the possible play between the axle box and the bogie frame measured from the middle position with ultimately worn components; |
wiR |
= |
possible transverse displacement of the bogie pivot, and the cradle in relation to the bogie frame or, for vehicles without bogie pivot, possible displacement of the bogie frame in relation to the vehicle frame measured from the middle position towards the internal side of the curve (varies according to the curve radius); |
waR |
= |
as wiR, but towards the outside of the curve; |
w∞ |
= |
as wiR, but on a straight track, from the middle position and towards both side; |
l |
= |
maximum track gauge in straight and in considered curved track =1,544 m; |
d |
= |
distance between ultimately worn wheel flanges, measured 10 mm outwards the running circle =1,492 m; |
R |
= |
curve radius; If w is constant or varies linearly according to 1/R, the radius to be considered is 150 m. In exceptional cases should be used the value of R ≥ 150 m, which gives the largest reduction. |
k |
= |
allowable gauge protrusion (to be increased by the 36/R widening of obstacle gauge) without the inclination due to the suspension flexibility; 0 for h < 330 mm for vehicles able to run over rail brakes (see Appendix R.B1), 0,060 m for h < 600 mm, 0,075 m for h ≥ 600 mm. |
h |
= |
height above the running surface at the considered location, the vehicle being in its lowest position. |
Reduction values
The half-width of vehicle cross-sections should be decreased:
3.1. For sections between bogie pivots;
By the greater of values Es and Es∞.
3.2. For sections beyond bogie pivots;
By the greater of values Eu and Eu∞.
(1) If the vehicle has no actual bogie pivot, a and n should be determined on the base of a fictional pivot located at the intersection of the longitudinal centrelines of the bogie and of the frame, the vehicle being in middle position (0,026 + q + w = 0) on a curved track of radius 150 m. If the distance between the pivot calculated by this manner and the bogie centre point is denoted y, the term p2 should be replaced by p2 – y2 in reduction formulae.
Appendix R.D1
Gauge of the vehicle lower step
1. This norm concerns the step used either for high (550/1 800) or for low platforms (265/1 600).
To avoid a uselessly wide gap between the step and the platform edge and taking account of the lower vehicle step and of high platforms (550/1 800 mm), the value 1,700 — E can be exceeded in compliance with Appendix R.C, if a fixed step is concerned. In such a case, the calculations hereafter should be applied which allow checking that, in spite of the protrusion, the step will not reach the platform. The coach should be examined in its lowest position in relation to the running surface.
2. Distance between the track centreline and the platform:
Room required for the step:
3.1. Step located between bogie pivots:
3.2. Step located beyond bogie pivots:
4. Notations (values in metres):
As, Au |
= |
distance between the track centreline and the outer edge of a step; |
B |
= |
distance between the vehicle centreline and the outer edge of the step; |
a |
= |
distance between bogie pivots or between end axles; |
n |
= |
distance of the step cross section most remote from the bogie pivot; |
p |
= |
bogie wheel base; |
q |
= |
possible transverse displacement due to the play between the axle and the axle box added with the play between the axle box and the bogie frame measured from the middle position with ultimately worn components; |
wiR |
= |
possible transverse displacement of the bogie pivot and the cradle, measured from the middle position towards the internal side of the curve; |
waR |
= |
as wiR, but towards the outside of the curve; |
wiR/aR |
= |
maximum value in considered curved track (for fixed steps); 0,005 m (for controlled steps which for v ≤ 5 km/h unfurl automatically); |
l |
= |
maximum track gauge in straight and in considered curved track =1,544 m; |
d |
= |
distance between ultimately worn wheel flanges, measured 10 mm outwards the running circle =1,492 m; |
R |
= |
Curve radius =500 m …. ∞; |
t |
= |
allowed tolerance (0,020 m) for the displacement of the rail towards the platform between two maintenance actions. |
Rules related to the transverse distance between the step and the platform:
5.1. Distance AV = L-As/u should be at least 0,020 m.
5.2. On a straight track, with a coach in its middle position and a platform in its nominal location, a 150 mm distance between vehicle and platform is considered as sufficiently small. Anyway the smallest value should be sought for this distance. In the opposite case, the check is made on a straight and on a curved track where As/u is maximum.
6. Gauge check
Gauge check for the lower steps should be carried out on a straight track and on a 500 m curve, if value w is constant or varies linearly according to 1/R. Otherwise, the check should be carried out on a straight track and on curve where As/u is maximum.
7. Display of the outputs
Formulae used, inserted and resulting values should be displayed in an easily understood manner.
Appendix R.D2
Gauge of outwards opening doors and of opened steps for coaches and multiple units
1. To avoid a uselessly wide gap between the step and the platform edge, the value 1,700 — E (see UIC Leaflet 560 § 1.1.4.2) can be exceeded in compliance with Appendix R.C, in the design of an outwards opening door with a step in open or closed position, or when the door and the step are moving between open and closed positions. In this case the checks hereafter should be carried out, among others to evidence that, in spite of the additional displacement, neither the door nor the step interfere with the fixed equipment (RAMO item 2.9 Annex 2). In the calculations the coach should be examined in its lowest position in relation to the running surface.
Hereafter, the word door includes the step as well.
NOTE: Appendix R.D2 may also be used to check the outer rear-view mirror of a loco and motor car the mirror being in open position. During normal line traffic the mirror is closed in a position recessed inside the body gauge.
2. The distance between the track centreline and the fixed equipment is: ;
AT |
= |
1,800 m when h < 600 mm, |
AT |
= |
1,920 m when 600 < h ≤ 1 300 mm, |
AT |
= |
2,000 m when h > 1 300 mm. |
Room required for to the door:
3.1. Door located between bogie pivots:
3.2. Door located beyond bogie pivots:
Notation (values in metres):
AT |
= |
nominal distance between the track centreline and the fixed equipment (on a straight track); |
h |
= |
height above the running surface at the considered location, the vehicle being in its lowest position; |
Os, Ou |
= |
distance allowed between the track centreline and the door edge, when the door is in its most protruding position; |
B |
= |
distance between the vehicle centreline and the door edge, when the door is in its most protruding position; |
a |
= |
distance between bogie pivots or between end axles; |
n |
= |
distance of the door cross section most remote from the bogie pivot; |
p |
= |
bogie wheel base; |
q |
= |
possible transverse displacement due to the play between the axle and the axle box added with the play between the axle box and the bogie frame measured from the middle position with ultimately worn components; |
wiR |
= |
possible transverse displacement of the bogie pivot and the cradle, measured from the middle position towards the internal side of the curve; |
waR |
= |
as wiR, but towards the outside of the curve; |
wiR/aR |
= |
0,020 m, maximum value for speeds less than 30 km/h (UIC 560); |
l |
= |
maximum track gauge in straight and in considered curved track =1,544 m; |
d |
= |
distance between ultimately worn wheel flanges, measured 10mm outwards the running circle =1,492 m |
R |
= |
Curve radius: for h < 600 mm, R = 500 m, for h ≥ 600 mm, R = 150 m. |
t |
= |
allowed tolerance (0,020 m) for the displacement of the rail towards the fixed equipment between two maintenance actions. |
4. Rules related to the transverse distance between the door and the fixed equipment:
Distance OV = L – Os/u should be at least 0,020 m.
5. Gauge check
Door gauge check should be carried out on a straight track and on a 500/150-m curve, if value w varies linearly according to 1/R. Otherwise, the check should be carried out on a straight track and on curve where Os/u is maximum.
6. Display of the outputs
Formulae used, inserted and resulting values should be displayed in an easily understood manner.
Appendix R.E
Pantograph and non-insulated live parts
Figure R.3
Any non-insulated live part shall not be placed in the shaded area (25 kV).
1. |
Es or Eu shall be added in the transversal direction according to Appendix R.C. |