This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CN0802
Case C-802/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 31 October 2019 — Company Z v Tax Office Y
Case C-802/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 31 October 2019 — Company Z v Tax Office Y
Case C-802/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 31 October 2019 — Company Z v Tax Office Y
IO C 45, 10.2.2020, pp. 20–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.2.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 45/20 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 31 October 2019 — Company Z v Tax Office Y
(Case C-802/19)
(2020/C 45/17)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Bundesfinanzhof
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Company Z
Defendant: Tax Office Y
Questions referred
|
1. |
Based on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 24 October 1996, Elida Gibbs, C-317/94 (EU:C:1996:400), is a pharmacy which supplies medicinal products to a statutory health insurance fund entitled to reduce the taxable amount as a result of a discount granted to the persons insured under a health insurance scheme? |
|
2. |
In the event that this is answered in the affirmative: Is it contrary to the principles of neutrality and equal treatment in the internal market if a pharmacy in the national territory is able to reduce the taxable amount, but a pharmacy which supplies the statutory health insurance fund by means of an intra-Community, tax-exempt supply from another Member State is not able to do so? |