This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/042/66
Case T-406/06: Action brought on 28 December 2006 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
Case T-406/06: Action brought on 28 December 2006 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
Case T-406/06: Action brought on 28 December 2006 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
IO C 42, 24.2.2007, p. 38–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 24/02/2007; Dáta foilsithe
- Author:
- Cúirt Chéadchéime
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
|
24.2.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 42/38 |
Action brought on 28 December 2006 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
(Case T-406/06)
(2007/C 42/66)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Form of order sought
|
— |
Annul the Commission's decision (DG ENV) to reject the applicant's bid and to award the contract to the successful contractor; |
|
— |
order the Commission (DG ENV) to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected; |
|
— |
order the Commission (DG ENV) to pay the applicant's damages suffered on account of the tendering procedure in question for an amount of EUR 86 300. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The applicant submitted a bid in response to the defendant's call for an open tender for the provision of services to support Registries Systems established under Directive 2003/87 (1) with technical maintenance and user support (OJ 2006/S 102-108793). The applicant contests the decision to reject its bid and to award the contract to another bidder.
In support of its application, the applicant submits that the defendant committed several errors of assessment and violated the principles of equal treatment and transparency. Furthermore, the applicant claims that the defendant did not state reasons for its decision by not informing the applicant of the merits of the successful tender compared to the applicant's tender.
(1) Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32).
