This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TB0032
Case T-32/09 P: Order of the General Court of 28 October 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Pre-litigation procedure — Appeal clearly unfounded — Cross-appeal limited to costs)
Case T-32/09 P: Order of the General Court of 28 October 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Pre-litigation procedure — Appeal clearly unfounded — Cross-appeal limited to costs)
Case T-32/09 P: Order of the General Court of 28 October 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Pre-litigation procedure — Appeal clearly unfounded — Cross-appeal limited to costs)
OJ C 346, 18.12.2010, p. 41–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 28/10/2010
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Italian
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
18.12.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 346/41 |
Order of the General Court of 28 October 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case T-32/09 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Pre-litigation procedure - Appeal clearly unfounded - Cross-appeal limited to costs)
2010/C 346/82
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, and A. dal Ferro, lawyer)
Re:
Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 4 November 2008 in Case F-18/07 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking the annulment of that order.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed as clearly unfounded. |
|
2. |
The cross-appeal is dismissed as clearly inadmissible. |
|
3. |
Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear, in addition to his own costs, the costs incurred by the Commission in the appeal. |
|
4. |
Each party is ordered to bear its own costs in the cross-appeal. |
