This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018CN0688
Case C-688/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 November 2018 — Criminal proceedings against TX and UW
Case C-688/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 November 2018 — Criminal proceedings against TX and UW
Case C-688/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 November 2018 — Criminal proceedings against TX and UW
IO C 25, 21.1.2019, p. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
21.1.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 25/28 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 November 2018 — Criminal proceedings against TX and UW
(Case C-688/18)
(2019/C 25/35)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad
Parties to the main proceedings
TX and UW
Question referred
Is the right of a defendant to be present at the trial pursuant to Article 8(1) and (2) in conjunction with recitals 35 and 44 of Directive (EU) 2016/343 (1) infringed if one of the hearings in criminal proceedings took place in the absence of the defendant, who was duly summoned, informed of the consequences of non-appearance and defended by a lawyer chosen by him, if:
(a) |
he did not appear for a reason within his control (namely he decided not to participate in that specific hearing); |
(b) |
he did not appear for a reason beyond his control (namely illness), if he was subsequently informed of the acts carried out in his absence and, with full knowledge of the situation, decided and declared that:
|
(1) Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (OJ 2016 L 65, p. 1).