Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CN0017

    Case C-17/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Mureș (Romania) lodged on 9 January 2018 — Criminal proceedings against Virgil Mailat, Delia Elena Mailat and Apcom Select SA

    IO C 123, 9.4.2018, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    9.4.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 123/11


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Mureș (Romania) lodged on 9 January 2018 — Criminal proceedings against Virgil Mailat, Delia Elena Mailat and Apcom Select SA

    (Case C-17/18)

    (2018/C 123/16)

    Language of the case: Romanian

    Referring court

    Tribunalul Mureș

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Virgil Mailat, Delia Elena Mailat and Apcom Select SA

    Questions referred

    1.

    Does the conclusion of an agreement whereby a company leases a building in which specific catering activities had previously been carried on in a restaurant to another company, together with all capital equipment and inventory items, where the tenant company continues the same catering activities in a restaurant with the same name as was used previously, constitute a transfer of a business within the meaning of Articles 19 and 29 of Directive 2006/112/EC? (1)

    2.

    In the event that Question 1 is answered in the negative, is the transaction described above a supply of services that may be regarded as the letting of immovable property within the meaning of Article 135(1)(l) of [Directive 2006/112/EC], or a supply of complex services that may not be regarded as the letting of immovable property and that is taxable by operation of the law?


    (1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.


    Top