Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62022CN0510

    Case C-510/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 28 July 2022 — Romaqua Group SA v Societatea Națională a Apelor Minerale and Agenția Națională pentru Resurse Minerale

    OJ C 424, 7.11.2022, p. 26–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    7.11.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 424/26

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 28 July 2022 — Romaqua Group SA v Societatea Națională a Apelor Minerale and Agenția Națională pentru Resurse Minerale

    (Case C-510/22)

    (2022/C 424/34)

    Language of the case: Romanian

    Referring court

    Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Romaqua Group SA

    Respondents: Societatea Națională a Apelor Minerale and Agenția Națională pentru Resurse Minerale

    Questions referred

    1.

    Is Article 106(1) TFEU to be interpreted as precluding provisions of national legislation, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which maintain the direct, original and non-competitive award, to a company whose capital is wholly owned by the State, of licences for the exploitation of mineral water springs by means of successive and unlimited extensions of exclusive licences (available to the state-owned company)?

    2.

    Are Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Articles 49 and 119 TFEU, and Article 3 of Directive 2009/54/EC on the exploitation and marketing of natural mineral waters (1) to be interpreted as precluding provisions of national legislation, such as those at issue in the main proceedings and mentioned above, which introduce an unjustified restriction on the freedom to conduct a business, including the freedom of establishment?

    (1)  Directive 2009/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the exploitation and marketing of natural mineral waters (OJ 2009 L 164, p. 45).

    Top