This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CN0804
Case C-804/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 31 October 2019 — BU v Markt24 GmbH
Case C-804/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 31 October 2019 — BU v Markt24 GmbH
Case C-804/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 31 October 2019 — BU v Markt24 GmbH
OJ C 45, 10.2.2020, p. 21–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
10.2.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 45/21 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 31 October 2019 — BU v Markt24 GmbH
(Case C-804/19)
(2020/C 45/18)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Landesgericht Salzburg
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: BU
Defendant: Markt24 GmbH
Questions referred
1. |
Is Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) applicable to an employment relationship in which, although an employment contract was entered into in Austria for the performance of work in Germany, the female employee, who remained in Austria and was prepared for several months to work, did not perform any work?
|
2. |
Is Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that it is possible to apply a national provision which enables an employee to bring an action in the place where she was resident during the employment relationship or at the time when the employment relationship ended (thus facilitating the process of bringing an action), as is the case with Paragraph 4(1)(a) of the Arbeits- und Sozialgerichtsgesetz (Law on the labour and social courts; ‘the ASGG’)? |
3. |
Is Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that it is possible to apply a national provision which enables an employee to bring an action in the place where the remuneration is to be paid or was to be paid upon termination of his employment relationship (thus facilitating the process of bringing an action), as is the case with Paragraph 4(1)(d) of the ASGG? |
4. |
In the event that Questions 2 and 3 are answered in the negative:
|
5. |
Is Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 applicable to an employment relationship in which, although an employment contract was entered into in Austria for the performance of work in Germany, the female employee, who remained in Austria and was prepared for several months to work, did not perform any work, if it is possible to apply a national provision which enables an employee to bring an action in the place where she was resident during the employment relationship or at the time when the employment relationship ended (thus facilitating the process of bringing an action), as is the case with Paragraph 4(1)(a) of the ASGG, or if it is possible to apply a national provision which enables an employee to bring an action in the place where the remuneration is to be paid or was to be paid upon termination of the employment relationship (thus facilitating the process of bringing an action), as is the case with Paragraph 4(1)(d) of the ASGG? |
(1) Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).