This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CN0315
Case C-315/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen (Belgium) lodged on 16 April 2019 — YU v Wallonische Region
Case C-315/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen (Belgium) lodged on 16 April 2019 — YU v Wallonische Region
Case C-315/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen (Belgium) lodged on 16 April 2019 — YU v Wallonische Region
OJ C 77, 9.3.2020, p. 12–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.3.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 77/12 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen (Belgium) lodged on 16 April 2019 — YU v Wallonische Region
(Case C-315/19)
(2020/C 77/16)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: YU
Defendant: Wallonische Region
By order of 26 September 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) gives the following ruling:
Article 45 TFEU is to be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State pursuant to which an employee residing in that Member State can rely on an exception to the obligation to register in the employee’s Member State of residence a vehicle, which has been made available to the employee by an employer established in a different Member State where the vehicle is registered, only if the documents proving that the condition for the exception is met are at all times carried by the employee in the vehicle.