This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0854
Case T-854/16: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2018 — Barata v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2015 promotion procedure — Certification procedure — Exclusion from the definitive list of officials authorised to follow the training programme — Article 45a of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence)
Case T-854/16: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2018 — Barata v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2015 promotion procedure — Certification procedure — Exclusion from the definitive list of officials authorised to follow the training programme — Article 45a of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence)
Case T-854/16: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2018 — Barata v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2015 promotion procedure — Certification procedure — Exclusion from the definitive list of officials authorised to follow the training programme — Article 45a of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence)
OJ C 25, 21.1.2019, p. 39–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.1.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 25/39 |
Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2018 — Barata v Parliament
(Case T-854/16) (1)
((Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2015 promotion procedure - Certification procedure - Exclusion from the definitive list of officials authorised to follow the training programme - Article 45a of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Equal treatment - Rights of the defence))
(2019/C 25/49)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: João Miguel Barata (Evere, Belgium) (represented by: G. Pandey, D. Rovetta, lawyers, and J. Grayston, solicitor)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: D. Nessaf and Í. Ní Riagáin Düro, agents)
Re:
Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment, first, of the Parliament’s decision dated 29 January 2016 and the confirmatory decision dated 29 March 2016 not to include the applicant’s name on the list of officials authorised to participate in 2015 in the training programme in respect of the 2015 certification procedure, secondly, of the decision dated 25 August 2016 rejecting the complaint, thirdly, of Notice of internal competition 2015/023, communicated to the staff on 18 September 2015, and, fourthly, of the draft list of officials selected to participate in the training programme in question.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr João Miguel Barata to pay the costs. |