This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32023R2772
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards
C/2023/5303
OJ L, 2023/2772, 22.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2772/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
In force: This act has been changed. Current consolidated version: 22/12/2023
Official Journal |
EN Series L |
2023/2772 |
22.12.2023 |
COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2023/2772
of 31 July 2023
supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (1), and in particular Article 29b(1), first subparagraph, thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Directive 2013/34/EU, as amended by Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2), requires large undertakings, small and medium-sized undertakings with securities admitted to trading on the EU regulated markets, as well as parent undertakings of large groups, to include in a dedicated section of their management report or consolidated management report the information necessary to understand the undertaking’s impacts on sustainability matters, and the information necessary to understand how sustainability matters affect the undertaking’s development, performance and position. Undertakings are to prepare this information in accordance with sustainability reporting standards starting from the financial year indicated in Article 5(2) of Directive (EU) 2022/2464 for each category of undertakings. |
(2) |
The Commission is required to adopt by 30 June 2023 a first set of standards specifying the information that undertakings are to report in accordance with Article 19a(1) and (2), and Article 29a(1) and (2) of that Directive, including at least the information that financial market participants need in order to comply with the disclosure obligations of Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3). |
(3) |
The Commission has taken into account the technical advice provided by the EFRAG. EFRAG’s independent technical advice meets the criteria set out in Article 49(3b), first, second and third subparagraphs, of Directive 2013/34/EU. To ensure proportionality and to facilitate the correct application of the standards by undertakings, the Commission has introduced modifications to EFRAG’s technical advice as regards the materiality approach, the phasing-in of certain requirements, the conversion of certain requirements into voluntary datapoints, the introduction of flexibilities in a number of disclosure requirements, the introduction of technical modifications to ensure coherence with the Union’s legal framework and a high degree of interoperability with global standard-setting initiatives, as well as editorial modifications. |
(4) |
These sustainability reporting standards meet the requirements set out in Article 29b of Directive 2013/34/EU. |
(5) |
Common sustainability reporting standards should therefore be adopted. |
(6) |
In accordance with Article 29b(1), fourth subparagraph, of Directive 2013/34/EU this Regulation should not enter into force earlier than 4 months after its adoption by the Commission. Considering that Article 5(2) of Directive (EU) 2022/2464 requires certain categories of undertakings to apply these sustainability reporting standards for financial years starting on or after 1 January 2024, this Regulation should enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
(7) |
In accordance with Article 49(3b), fourth subparagraph, of Directive 2013/34/EU, the Commission has consulted jointly the Member State Expert Group on Sustainable Finance, referred to in Article 24 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4), and the Accounting Regulatory Committee, referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council (5). In accordance with Article 49(3b), fifth subparagraph, of Directive 2013/34/EU, the Commission has requested the opinion of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), in particular with regard to the consistency of this Regulation with Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 and the delegated acts adopted pursuant to that Regulation. In accordance with Article 49(3b), sixth subparagraph, of Directive 2013/34/EU, the Commission has also consulted the European Environment Agency, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, the European Central Bank, the Committee of European Auditing Oversight Bodies and the Platform on Sustainable Finance established pursuant to Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Subject matter
The sustainability reporting standards that undertakings are to use for carrying out their sustainability reporting in accordance with Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU following the timetable set out in Article 5(2) of Directive (EU) 2022/2464 are set out in Annexes I and II of this Regulation.
Article 2
Entry into force and application
This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 1 January 2024 for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2024.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 31 July 2023.
For the Commission
The President
Ursula VON DER LEYEN
(1) OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19.
(2) Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15).
(3) Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (OJ L 317, 9.12.2019, p. 1).
(4) Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (OJ L 198, 22.6.2020, p. 13).
(5) Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards (OJ L 243, 11.9.2002, p 1).
ANNEX I
European sustainability reporting standards (ESRS)
ESRS 1 |
General requirements |
ESRS 2 |
General disclosures |
ESRS E1 |
Climate change |
ESRS E2 |
Pollution |
ESRS E3 |
Water and marine resources |
ESRS E4 |
Biodiversity and ecosystems |
ESRS E5 |
Resource use and circular economy |
ESRS S1 |
Own workforce |
ESRS S2 |
Workers in the value chain |
ESRS S3 |
Affected communities |
ESRS S4 |
Consumers and end-users |
ESRS G1 |
Business conduct |
ESRS 1
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
1. |
Categories of ESRS Standards, reporting areas and drafting conventions |
1.1 |
Categories of ESRS Standards |
1.2 |
Reporting areas and minimum content disclosure requirements on policies, actions, targets and metrics |
1.3 |
Drafting conventions |
2. |
Qualitative characteristics of information |
3. |
Double materiality as the basis for sustainability disclosures |
3.1 |
Stakeholders and their relevance to the materiality assessment process |
3.2 |
Material matters and materiality of information |
3.3 |
Double materiality |
3.4 |
Impact materiality |
3.5 |
Financial materiality |
3.6 |
Material impacts or risks arising from actions to address sustainability matters |
3.7 |
Level of disaggregation |
4. |
Due diligence |
5. |
Value chain |
5.1 |
Reporting undertaking and value chain |
5.2 |
Estimation using sector averages and proxies |
6. |
Time horizons |
6.1 |
Reporting period |
6.2 |
Linking past, present and future |
6.3 |
Reporting progress against the base year |
6.4 |
Definition of short-, medium- and long-term for reporting purposes |
7 |
Preparation and presentation of sustainability information |
7.1 |
Presenting comparative information |
7.2 |
Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty |
7.3 |
Updating disclosures about events after the end of the reporting period |
7.4 |
Changes in preparation or presentation of sustainability information |
7.5 |
Reporting errors in prior periods |
7.6 |
Consolidated reporting and subsidiary exemption |
7.7 |
Classified and sensitive information, and information on intellectual property, know-how or results of innovation |
7.8 |
Reporting on opportunities |
8. |
Structure of sustainability statement |
8.1 |
General presentation requirement |
8.2 |
Content and structure of the sustainability statement |
9. |
Linkages with other parts of corporate reporting and connected information |
9.1 |
Incorporation by reference |
9.2 |
Connected information and connectivity with financial statements |
10. |
Transitional provisions |
10.1 |
Transitional provision related to entity-specific disclosures |
10.2 |
Transitional provision related to chapter 5 Value chain |
10.3 |
Transitional provision related to section 7.1 Presenting comparative information |
10.4 |
Transitional provision: List of Disclosure Requirements that are phased-in |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
– |
Entity-specific disclosures |
– |
Double materiality |
– |
Estimation using sector averages and proxies |
– |
Content and structure of the sustainability statement |
Appendix B: |
Qualitative characteristics of information |
Appendix C: |
List of phased-in Disclosure Requirements |
Appendix D: |
Structure of ESRS sustainability statement |
Appendix E: |
Flowchart for determining disclosures to be included |
Appendix F: |
Example of structure of ESRS sustainability statement |
Appendix G: |
Example of incorporation by reference |
Objective
1. |
The objective of European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) is to specify the sustainability information that an undertaking shall disclose in accordance with Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), as amended by Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2) Reporting in accordance with ESRS does not exempt undertakings from other obligations laid down in Union law. |
2. |
Specifically, ESRS specify the information that an undertaking shall disclose about its material impacts , risks and opportunities in relation to environmental, social, and governance sustainability matters. ESRS do not require undertakings to disclose any information on environmental, social and governance topics covered by ESRS when the undertaking has assessed the topic in question as non-material (See Appendix E of this Standard “Flowchart for determining disclosures to be included”).The information disclosed in accordance with ESRS enables users of the sustainability statement to understand the undertaking’s material impacts on people and environment and the material effects of sustainability matters on the undertaking’s development, performance and position. |
3. |
The objective of this Standard (ESRS 1) is to provide an understanding of the architecture of ESRS, the drafting conventions and fundamental concepts used, and the general requirements for preparing and presenting sustainability information in accordance with Directive 2013/34/EU, as amended by Directive (EU) 2022/2464. |
1. Categories of ESRS Standards, reporting areas and drafting conventions
1.1 Categories of ESRS standards
4. |
There are three categories of ESRS:
Cross-cutting standards and topical standards are sector-agnostic, meaning that they apply to all undertakings regardless of which sector or sectors the undertaking operates in. |
5. |
The cross-cutting standards ESRS 1 General requirements and ESRS 2 General disclosures apply to the sustainability matters covered by topical standards and sector-specific standards. |
6. |
This standard (ESRS 1) describes the architecture of ESRS standards, explains drafting conventions and fundamental concepts, and sets out general requirements for preparing and presenting sustainability-related information. |
7. |
ESRS 2 establishes Disclosure Requirements on the information that the undertaking shall provide at a general level across all material sustainability matters on the reporting areas governance , strategy , impact, risk and opportunity management, and metrics and targets . |
8. |
Topical ESRS cover a sustainability topic and are structured into topics and sub-topics, and where necessary sub-sub-topics. The table in Application Requirement 16 (AR 16) to this standard provides an overview of the sustainability topics, sub-topics and sub-sub-topics (collectively ‘ sustainability matters ’) covered by topical ESRS. |
9. |
Topical ESRS can include specific requirements that complement the general level Disclosure Requirements of ESRS 2. ESRS 2 Appendix C Disclosure/Application Requirements in topical ESRS that are applicable jointly with ESRS 2 General Disclosures provides a list of the additional requirements in topical ESRS that the undertaking shall apply in conjunction with the general level disclosure requirements of ESRS 2. |
10. |
Sector-specific standards are applicable to all undertakings within a sector. They address impacts, risks and opportunities that are likely to be material for all undertakings in a specific sector and that are not covered, or not sufficiently covered, by topical standards. Sector-specific standards are multi-topical and cover the topics that are most relevant to the sector in question. Sector-specific standards achieve a high degree of comparability. |
11. |
In addition to the disclosure requirements laid down in the three categories of ESRS, when an undertaking concludes that an impact, risk or opportunity is not covered or not covered with sufficient granularity by an ESRS but is material due to its specific facts and circumstances, it shall provide additional entity-specific disclosures to enable users to understand the undertaking’s sustainability-related impacts, risks or opportunities . Application requirements AR 1 to AR 5 provide further guidance regarding entity-specific disclosures. |
1.2 Reporting areas and minimum content disclosure requirements on policies, actions, targets and metrics
12. |
The Disclosure Requirements in ESRS 2, in topical ESRS and in sector-specific ESRS are structured into the following reporting areas:
|
13. |
ESRS 2 includes:
The undertaking shall apply the minimum disclosure requirements regarding policies, actions, metrics and targets together with the corresponding Disclosure Requirements in topical and sector-specific ESRS. |
1.3 Drafting conventions
14. |
In all ESRS:
Collectively, these are referred to as “impacts, risks and opportunities” (IROs). They reflect the double materiality perspective of ESRS described in section 3. |
15. |
Throughout ESRS, the terms that are defined in the glossary of definitions (Annex II) are put in bold italic , except when a defined term is used more than once in the same paragraph. |
16. |
ESRS structure the information to be disclosed under Disclosure Requirements. Each Disclosure Requirement consists of one or more distinct datapoints. The term “datapoint” can also refer to a narrative sub-element of a Disclosure Requirement. |
17. |
In addition to Disclosure Requirements most ESRS also contain Application Requirements. Application Requirements support the application of Disclosure Requirements and have the same authority as other parts of an ESRS. |
18. |
ESRS use the following terms to distinguish between different degrees of obligation on the undertaking to disclose information:
In addition, ESRS use the term “shall consider” when referring to issues, resources or methodologies that the undertaking is expected to take into account or to use in the preparation of a given disclosure if applicable. |
2. Qualitative characteristics of information
19. |
When preparing its
sustainability statement
, the undertaking shall apply:
|
20. |
These qualitative characteristics of information are defined and described in Appendix B of this Standard. |
3. Double materiality as the basis for sustainability disclosures
21. |
The undertaking shall report on sustainability matters based on the double materiality principle as defined and explained in this chapter. |
3.1 Stakeholders and their relevance to the materiality assessment process
22. |
Stakeholders
are those who can affect or be affected by the undertaking. There are two main groups of stakeholders:
|
23. |
Some, but not all, stakeholders may belong to both groups referred to in paragraph 22. |
24. |
Engagement with affected stakeholders is central to the undertaking’s on-going due diligence process (see chapter 4 Due diligence) and sustainability materiality assessment. This includes its processes to identify and assess actual and potential negative impacts, which then inform the assessment process to identify the material impacts for the purposes of sustainability reporting (see section 3.4 of this Standard). |
3.2 Material matters and materiality of information
25. |
Performing a materiality assessment (see sections 3.4 Impact materiality and 3.5 Financial materiality) is necessary for the undertaking to identify the material impacts, risks and opportunities to be reported. |
26. |
Materiality assessment is the starting point for sustainability reporting under ESRS. IRO-1 in section 4.1 of ESRS 2, includes general disclosure requirements about the undertaking’s process to identify impacts, risks and opportunities and assess their materiality. SBM-3 of ESRS 2 provides general disclosure requirements on the material impacts, risks and opportunities resulting from the undertaking’s materiality assessment. |
27. |
The Application Requirements in Appendix A of this Standard include a list of sustainability matters covered in topical ESRS, categorised by topics, sub-topics and sub-sub-topics, to support the materiality assessment. Appendix E Flowchart for determining disclosures to be included of this Standard provides an illustration of the materiality assessment described in this section. |
28. |
A sustainability matter is “material” when it meets the criteria defined for impact materiality (see section 3.4 of this Standard) or financial materiality (see section 3.5 of this Standard), or both. |
29. |
Irrespective of the outcome of its materiality assessment, the undertaking shall always disclose the information required by: ESRS 2 General Disclosures (i.e. all the Disclosure Requirements and data points specified in ESRS 2) and the Disclosure Requirements (including their datapoints) in topical ESRS related to the Disclosure Requirement IRO-1 Description of the process to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities, as listed in ESRS 2 Appendix C Disclosure/Application Requirements in topical ESRS that are applicable jointly with ESRS 2 General Disclosures. |
30. |
When the undertaking concludes that a sustainability matter is material as a result of its
materiality
assessment, on which ESRS 2 IRO-1, IRO-2 and SBM-3 set disclosure requirements, it shall:
|
31. |
The applicable information prescribed within a Disclosure Requirement, including its datapoints, or an entity-specific disclosure, shall be disclosed when the undertaking assesses, as part of its assessment of material information, that the information is relevant from one or more of the following perspectives:
|
32. |
If the undertaking concludes that climate change is not material and therefore omits all disclosure requirements in ESRS E1 Climate change, it shall disclose a detailed explanation of the conclusions of its materiality assessment with regard to climate change (see ESRS 2 IRO-2 Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement), including a forward-looking analysis of the conditions that could lead the undertaking to conclude that climate change is material in the future. If the undertaking concludes that a topic other than climate change is not material and therefore it omits all the Disclosure Requirements in the corresponding topical ESRS, it may briefly explain the conclusions of its materiality assessment for that topic. |
33. |
When disclosing information on policies, actions and targets in relation to a sustainability matter that has been assessed to be material, the undertaking shall include the information prescribed by all the Disclosure Requirements and datapoints in the topical and sector-specific ESRS related to that matter and in the corresponding Minimum Disclosure Requirement on policies, actions, and targets required under ESRS 2. If the undertaking cannot disclose the information prescribed by either the Disclosure Requirements and datapoints in the topical or sector-specific ESRS, or the Minimum Disclosure Requirements in ESRS 2 on policies, actions and targets, because it has not adopted the respective policies, implemented the respective actions or set the respective targets, it shall disclose this to be the case and it may report a timeframe in which it aims to have these in place. |
34. |
When disclosing information on
metrics
for a material
sustainability matter
according to the Metrics and Targets section of the relevant topical ESRS, the undertaking:
|
35. |
If the undertaking omits the information prescribed by a datapoint that derives from other EU legislation listed in Appendix B of ESRS 2, it shall explicitly state that the information in question is “not material”. |
36. |
The undertaking shall establish how it applies criteria, including appropriate thresholds, to determine:
|
3.3 Double materiality
37. |
Double materiality has two dimensions, namely: impact materiality and financial materiality . Unless specified otherwise, the terms “material” and “materiality” are used throughout ESRS to refer to double materiality. |
38. |
Impact materiality and financial materiality assessments are inter-related and the interdependencies between these two dimensions shall be considered. In general, the starting point is the assessment of impacts, although there may also be material risks and opportunities that are not related to the undertaking’s impacts . A sustainability impact may be financially material from inception or become financially material, when it could reasonably be expected to affect the undertaking’s financial position, financial performance, cash flows, its access to finance or cost of capital over the short-, medium- or long-term. Impacts are captured by the impact materiality perspective irrespective of whether or not they are financially material. |
39. |
In identifying and assessing the impacts, risks and opportunities in the undertaking’s value chain to determine their materiality , the undertaking shall focus on areas where impacts, risks and opportunities are deemed likely to arise, based on the nature of the activities, business relationships, geographies or other factors concerned. |
40. |
The undertaking shall consider how it is affected by its dependencies on the availability of natural, human and social resources at appropriate prices and quality, irrespective of its potential impacts on those resources. |
41. |
An undertaking’s principal impacts, risks and opportunities are understood to be the same as the material impacts, risks and opportunities identified under the double materiality principle and therefore reported on in its sustainability statement. |
42. |
The undertaking shall apply the criteria set under sections 3.4 and 3.5 in this Standard, using appropriate quantitative and/or qualitative thresholds. Appropriate thresholds are necessary to determine which impacts, risks and opportunities are identified and addressed by the undertaking as material and to determine which sustainability matters are material for reporting purposes. Some existing standards and frameworks use the term "most significant impacts” when referring to the threshold used to identify the impacts that are described in ESRS as "material impacts." |
3.4 Impact materiality
43. |
A sustainability matter is material from an impact perspective when it pertains to the undertaking’s material actual or potential, positive or negative impacts on people or the environment over the short-, medium- or long-term. Impacts include those connected with the undertaking’s own operations and upstream and downstream value chain, including through its products and services, as well as through its business relationships. Business relationships include those in the undertaking’s upstream and downstream value chain and are not limited to direct contractual relationships. |
44. |
In this context, impacts on people or the environment include impacts in relation to environmental, social and governance matters. |
45. |
The
materiality
assessment of a negative impact is informed by the due diligence process defined in the international instruments of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. For actual negative impacts, materiality is based on the severity of the impact, while for potential negative impacts it is based on the severity and likelihood of the impact. Severity is based on the following factors:
In the case of a potential negative human rights impact, the severity of the impact takes precedence over its likelihood. |
46. |
For positive impacts,
materiality
is based on:
|
3.5 Financial materiality
47. |
The scope of financial materiality for sustainability reporting is an expansion of the scope of materiality used in the process of determining which information should be included in the undertaking’s financial statements. |
48. |
The financial materiality assessment corresponds to the identification of information that is considered material for primary users of general-purpose financial reports in making decisions relating to providing resources to the entity. In particular, information is considered material for primary users of general-purpose financial reports if omitting, misstating or obscuring that information could reasonably be expected to influence decisions that they make on the basis of the undertaking’s sustainability statement . |
49. |
A sustainability matter is material from a financial perspective if it triggers or could reasonably be expected to trigger material financial effects on the undertaking. This is the case when a sustainability matter generates risks or opportunities that have a material influence, or could reasonably be expected to have a material influence, on the undertaking’s development, financial position, financial performance, cash flows, access to finance or cost of capital over the short-, medium- or long-term. Risks and opportunities may derive from past events or future events. The financial materiality of a sustainability matter is not constrained to matters that are within the control of the undertaking but includes information on material risks and opportunities attributable to business relationships beyond the scope of consolidation used in the preparation of financial statements. |
50. |
Dependencies
on natural, human and social resources can be sources of financial
risks
or
opportunities
. Dependencies may trigger effects in two possible ways:
|
51. |
The materiality of risks and opportunities is assessed based on a combination of the likelihood of occurrence and the potential magnitude of the financial effects . |
3.6 Material impacts or risks arising from actions to address sustainability matters
52. |
The undertaking’s
materiality
assessment may lead to the identification of situations in which its
actions
to address certain
impacts
or
risks
, or to benefit from certain
opportunities
in relation to a sustainability matter, might have material negative impacts or cause material risks in relation to one or more other
sustainability matters
. For example:
|
53. |
In such situations, the undertaking shall:
|
3.7 Level of disaggregation
54. |
When needed for a proper understanding of its material
impacts, risks
and
opportunities
, the undertaking shall disaggregate the reported information:
|
55. |
When defining the appropriate level of disaggregation for reporting, the undertaking shall consider the disaggregation adopted in its materiality assessment. Depending on the undertaking’s specific facts and circumstances, a disaggregation by subsidiary may be necessary. |
56. |
Where data from different levels, or multiple locations within a level, is aggregated, the undertaking shall ensure that this aggregation does not obscure the specificity and context necessary to interpret the information. The undertaking shall not aggregate material items that differ in nature. |
57. |
When the undertaking presents information disaggregated by sectors, it shall adopt the ESRS sector classification to be specified in a delegated act adopted by the Commission pursuant to article 29b(1) third subparagraph, point (ii), of Directive 2013/34/EU. When a topical or sector-specific ESRS requires that a specific level of disaggregation is adopted in preparing a specific item of information, the requirement in the topical or sector-specific ESRS shall prevail. |
4. Due diligence
58. |
The outcome of the undertaking’s sustainability due diligence process (referred to as “due diligence” in the international instruments mentioned below) informs the undertaking’s assessment of its material impacts, risks and opportunities . ESRS do not impose any conduct requirements in relation to due diligence; nor do they extend or modify the role of the administrative, management or supervisory bodies of the undertaking with regard to the conduct of due diligence. |
59. |
Due diligence is the process by which undertakings identify, prevent, mitigate and account for how they address the actual and potential negative impacts on the environment and people connected with their business. These include negative impacts connected with the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, including through its products or services, as well as through its business relationships. Due diligence is an on-going practice that responds to and may trigger changes in the undertaking’s strategy, business model, activities, business relationships, operating, sourcing and selling contexts. This process is described in the international instruments of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. |
60. |
These international instruments identify a number of steps in the due diligence process, including the identification and assessment of negative impacts connected with the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, including through its products or services, as well as through its business relationships. Where the undertaking cannot address all impacts at once, the due diligence process allows for action to be prioritised based on the severity and likelihood of the impacts. It is this aspect of the due diligence process that informs the assessment of material impacts (see section 3.4 of this Standard). The identification of material impacts also supports the identification of material sustainability risks and opportunities , which are often a product of such impacts. |
61. |
The core elements of due diligence are reflected directly in Disclosure Requirements set out in ESRS 2 and in the topical ESRS, as illustrated below:
|
5. Value chain
5.1 Reporting undertaking and value chain
62. |
The sustainability statement shall be for the same reporting undertaking as the financial statements. For example, if the reporting undertaking is a parent company required to prepare consolidated financial statements, the sustainability statement will be for the group. This requirement does not apply where the reporting undertaking is not required to draw-up financial statements or where the reporting undertaking is preparing consolidated sustainability reporting pursuant to Article 48i of Directive 2013/34/EU. |
63. |
The information about the reporting undertaking provided in the
sustainability statement
shall be extended to include information on the material
impacts, risks
and
opportunities
connected with the undertaking through its direct and indirect
business relationships
in the upstream and/or downstream
value chain
(“value chain information”). In extending the information about the reporting undertaking, the undertaking shall include material impacts, risks and opportunities connected with its upstream and downstream value chain:
|
64. |
Paragraph 63 does not require information on each and every actor in the value chain , but only the inclusion of material upstream and downstream value chain information. Different sustainability matters can be material in relation to different parts of the undertaking’s upstream and downstream value chain. The information shall be extended to include value chain information only in relation to the parts of the value chain for which the matter is material. |
65. |
The undertaking shall include material
value chain
information when this is necessary to:
|
66. |
When determining at which level within its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain a material sustainability matter arises, the undertaking shall use its assessment of impacts, risks and opportunities following the double materiality principle (see chapter 3 of this Standard). |
67. |
When associates or joint ventures, accounted for under the equity method or proportionally consolidated in the financial statements, are part of the undertaking’s value chain, for example as suppliers, the undertaking shall include information related to those associates or joint ventures in accordance with paragraph 63 consistent with the approach adopted for the other business relationships in the value chain. In this case, when determining impact metrics , the data of the associate or joint venture are not limited to the share of equity held, but shall be taken into account on the basis of the impacts that are connected with the undertaking’s products and services through its business relationships. |
5.2 Estimation using sector averages and proxies
68. |
The undertaking’s ability to obtain the necessary upstream and downstream value chain information may vary depending on various factors, such as the undertaking’s contractual arrangements, the level of control that it exercises on the operations outside the consolidation scope and its buying power. When the undertaking does not have the ability to control the activities of its upstream and/or downstream value chain and its business relationships, obtaining value chain information may be more challenging. |
69. |
There are circumstances where the undertaking cannot collect the information about its upstream and downstream value chain as required by paragraph 63 after making reasonable efforts to do so. In these circumstances, the undertaking shall estimate the information to be reported about its upstream and downstream value chain, by using all reasonable and supportable information, such as sector-average data and other proxies. |
70. |
Obtaining value chain information could also be challenging in the case of SMEs and other upstream and/or downstream value chain entities that are not in the scope of the sustainability reporting required by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (see ESRS 2 BP-2 Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances). |
71. |
With reference to policies, actions and targets, the undertaking’s reporting shall include upstream and/or downstream value chain information to the extent that those policies, actions and targets involve actors in the value chain . With reference to metrics , in many cases, in particular for environmental matters for which proxies are available, the undertaking may be able to comply with the reporting requirements without collecting data from the actors in its upstream and downstream value chain, especially from SMEs, for example, when calculating the undertaking’s GHG Scope 3 emissions. |
72. |
The incorporation of estimates made using sector-average data or other proxies shall not result in information that does not meet the qualitative characteristics of information (see chapter 2 and section 7.2 Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty of this Standard). |
6. Time horizons
6.1 Reporting period
73. |
The reporting period for the undertaking’s sustainability statement shall be consistent with that of its financial statements. |
6.2 Linking past, present and future
74. |
The undertaking shall establish appropriate linkages in its sustainability statement between retrospective and forward-looking information, when relevant, to foster a clear understanding of how historical information relates to future-oriented information. |
6.3 Reporting progress against the base year
75. |
A base year is the historical reference date or period for which information is available and against which subsequent information can be compared over time. |
76. |
The undertaking shall present comparative information in respect of the base year for amounts reported in the current period when reporting the developments and progress towards a target, unless the relevant Disclosure Requirement already defines how to report progress. The undertaking may also include historical information about achieved milestones between the base year and the reporting period when this is relevant information. |
6.4 Definition of short-, medium- and long-term for reporting purposes
77. |
When preparing its
sustainability statement
, the undertaking shall adopt the following time intervals as of the end of the reporting period:
|
78. |
The undertaking shall use an additional breakdown for the long-term time horizon when impacts or actions are expected in a period longer than 5 years if necessary to provide relevant information to users of sustainability statements . |
79. |
If different definitions of medium- or long-term time horizons are required for specific items of disclosure in other ESRS, the definitions in those ESRS shall prevail. |
80. |
There may be circumstances where the use of the medium- or long-term time horizons defined in paragraph 77 results in non-relevant information, as the undertaking uses a different definition for (i) its processes of identification and management of material impacts, risks and opportunities or (ii) the definition of its actions and setting targets . These circumstances may be due to industry-specific characteristics, such as cash flow and business cycles, the expected duration of capital investments, the time horizons over which the users of sustainability statements conduct their assessments or the planning horizons typically used in the undertaking’s industry for decision-making. In these circumstances, the undertaking may adopt a different definition of medium- and/or long- term time horizons (see ESRS 2 BP–2, paragraph 9). |
81. |
References to “short-term”, “medium-term”, and “long-term” in ESRS refer to the time horizon as determined by the undertaking according to the provisions in paragraphs 77 to 80. |
7. Preparation and presentation of sustainability information
82. |
This chapter provides general requirements to be applied when preparing and presenting sustainability information. |
7.1 Presenting comparative information
83. |
The undertaking shall disclose comparative information in respect of the previous period for all quantitative metrics and monetary amounts disclosed in the current period. When relevant to an understanding of the current period’s sustainability statement , the undertaking shall also disclose comparative information for narrative disclosures. |
84. |
When the undertaking reports comparative information that differs from the information reported in the previous period it shall disclose:
|
85. |
Sometimes, it is impracticable to adjust comparative information for one or more prior periods to achieve comparability with the current period. For example, data might not have been collected in the prior period(s) in a way that allows either retrospective application of a new definition of a metric or target, or retrospective restatement to correct a prior period error, and it may be impracticable to recreate the information (see ESRS 2 BP-2). When it is impracticable to adjust comparative information for one or more prior periods, the undertaking shall disclose this fact. |
86. |
When an ESRS requires the undertaking to present more than one comparative period for a metric or datapoint, the requirements of that ESRS shall prevail. |
7.2 Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty
87. |
When quantitative metrics and monetary amounts, including upstream and downstream value chain information (see chapter 5 of this Standard), cannot be measured directly and can only be estimated, measurement uncertainty may arise. |
88. |
An undertaking shall disclose information to enable users to understand the most significant uncertainties affecting the quantitative metrics and monetary amounts reported in its sustainability statement. |
89. |
The use of reasonable assumptions and estimates, including scenario or sensitivity analysis, is an essential part of preparing sustainability-related information and does not undermine the usefulness of that information, provided that the assumptions and estimates are accurately described and explained. Even a high level of measurement uncertainty would not necessarily prevent such an assumption or estimate from providing useful information or meeting the qualitative characteristics of information (see Appendix B of this Standard). |
90. |
Data and assumptions used in preparing the sustainability statement shall be consistent to the extent possible with the corresponding financial data and assumptions used in the undertaking’s financial statements. |
91. |
Some ESRS require the disclosure of information such as explanations about possible future events that have uncertain outcomes. In judging whether information about such possible future events is material, the undertaking shall refer to the criteria in Chapter 3 of this Standard and consider:
|
92. |
When assessing the possible outcomes, the undertaking shall consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including information about low-probability and high-impact outcomes, which, when aggregated, could become material. For example, the undertaking might be exposed to several impacts or risks, each of which could cause the same type of disruption, such as disruptions to the undertaking’s supply chain . Information about an individual source of risk might not be material if disruption from that source is highly unlikely to occur. However, information about the aggregate risk of supply chain disruption from all sources might be material (see ESRS 2 BP-2). |
7.3 Updating disclosures about events after the end of the reporting period
93. |
In some cases, the undertaking may receive information after the reporting period but before the management report is approved for issuance. If such information provides evidence or insights about conditions existing at period end, the undertaking shall, where appropriate, update estimates and sustainability disclosures, in the light of the new information. |
94. |
When such information provides evidence or insights about material transactions, other events and conditions that arise after the end of the reporting period, the undertaking shall, where appropriate, provide narrative information indicating the existence, nature and potential consequences of these post-year end events. |
7.4 Changes in preparation or presentation of sustainability information
95. |
The definition and calculation of
metrics
, including metrics used to set
targets
and monitor progress towards them, shall be consistent over time. The undertaking shall provide restated comparative figures, unless it is impracticable to do so (see ESRS 2 BP-2), when it has:
|
7.5 Reporting errors in prior periods
96. |
The undertaking shall correct material prior period errors by restating the comparative amounts for the prior period(s) disclosed, unless it is impracticable to do so. This requirement does not extend to reporting periods before the first year of application of ESRS by the undertaking. |
97. |
Prior period errors are omissions from, and misstatements in, the undertaking’s
sustainability statement
for one or more prior periods. Such errors arise from a failure to use, or misuse of, reliable information that:
|
98. |
Such errors include: the effects of mathematical mistakes, mistakes in applying the definitions for metrics or targets , oversights or misinterpretations of facts, and fraud. |
99. |
Potential errors in the current period discovered in that period are corrected before the management report is authorised for issuance. However, material errors are sometimes only discovered in a subsequent period. |
100. |
When it is impracticable to determine the effect of an error on all prior periods presented, the undertaking shall restate the comparative information to correct the error from the earliest date practicable. When correcting disclosures for a prior period, the undertaking shall not use hindsight either in making assumptions about what the management’s intentions would have been in a prior period or in estimating the amounts disclosed in a prior period. This requirement applies to correction of both backward-looking and forward- looking disclosures. |
101. |
Corrections of errors are distinguished from changes in estimates. Estimates may need to be revised as additional information becomes known (see ESRS 2 BP-2). |
7.6 Consolidated reporting and subsidiary exemption
102. |
When the undertaking is reporting at a consolidated level, it shall perform its assessment of material impacts, risks and opportunities for the entire consolidated group, regardless of its group legal structure. It shall ensure that all subsidiaries are covered in a way that allows for the unbiased identification of material impacts, risks and opportunities. Criteria and thresholds for assessing an impact, risk or opportunity as material shall be determined based on chapter 3 of this Standard. |
103. |
Where the undertaking identifies significant differences between material impacts, risks or opportunities at group level and material impacts, risks or opportunities of one or more of its subsidiaries, the undertaking shall provide an adequate description of the impacts, risks and opportunities, as appropriate, of the subsidiary or subsidiaries concerned. |
104. |
When assessing whether the differences between material impacts, risks or opportunities at group level and material impacts, risks or opportunities of one or more of its subsidiaries are significant, the undertaking may consider different circumstances, such as whether the subsidiary or subsidiaries operate in a different sector than the rest of the group or the circumstances reflected in section 3.7 Level of disaggregation. |
7.7 Classified and sensitive information, and information on intellectual property, know-how or results of innovation
105. |
The undertaking is not required to disclose classified information or sensitive information , even if such information is considered material. |
106. |
When disclosing information about its
strategy, plans
and
actions
, where a specific piece of information corresponding to intellectual property, know-how or the results of innovation is relevant to meet the objective of a Disclosure Requirement, the undertaking may nevertheless omit that specific piece of information if it:
|
107. |
If the undertaking omits classified information or sensitive information , or a specific piece of information corresponding to intellectual property, know-how or the results of innovation because it meets the criteria established in the previous paragraph, it shall comply with the disclosure requirement in question by disclosing all other required information. |
108. |
The undertaking shall make every reasonable effort to ensure that beyond the omission of the classified information or sensitive information , or of the specific piece of information corresponding to intellectual property, know-how or the results of innovation, the overall relevance of the disclosure in question is not impaired. |
7.8 Reporting on opportunities
109. |
When reporting on
opportunities
, the disclosure should consist of descriptive information allowing the reader to understand the opportunity for the undertaking or the entire sector. When reporting on opportunities, the undertaking shall consider the
materiality
of the information to be disclosed. In this context, it shall consider, among other factors:
|
8. Structure of the sustainability statement
110. |
This chapter provides the basis for the presentation of the information about sustainability matters prepared in compliance with Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU (i.e., the sustainability statement ) within the undertaking’s management report. Such information is presented in a dedicated section of the management report identified as the sustainability statement. Appendix F Example of structure of ESRS sustainability statement of this Standard provides an illustrative example of a sustainability statement structured according to the requirements of this chapter. |
8.1 General presentation requirement
111. |
Sustainability information shall be presented:
|
8.2 Content and structure of the sustainability statement
112. |
Except for the possibility to incorporate information by reference in accordance with section 9.1 Incorporation by reference of this Standard, the undertaking shall report all the applicable disclosures required by ESRS in accordance with chapter 1 of this Standard, within a dedicated section of the management report. |
113. |
The undertaking shall include in its sustainability statement the disclosures pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and the Council (8) and to the Commission Delegated Regulations that specify the content and other modalities of those disclosures. The undertaking shall ensure that these disclosures are separately identifiable within the sustainability statement. The disclosures relating to each of the environmental objectives defined in the Taxonomy Regulation shall be presented together in a clearly identifiable part of the environmental section of the sustainability statement. These disclosures are not subject to the provisions of ESRS, with the exception of this paragraph and the first sentence of paragraph 115 of this standard. |
114. |
When the undertaking includes in its
sustainability statement
additional disclosures stemming from (i) other legislation which requires the undertaking to disclose sustainability information, or (ii) generally accepted sustainability reporting standards and frameworks, including non-mandatory guidance and sector-specific guidance, published by other standard-setting bodies (such as technical material issued by the International Sustainability Standards Board or the Global Reporting Initiative), such disclosures shall:
|
115. |
The undertaking shall structure its sustainability statement in four parts, in the following order: general information, environmental information (including disclosures pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852), social information and governance information. Respecting the provision in section 3.6 Material impacts or risks arising from actions to address sustainability matters of this Standard, when information provided in one part contains information to be reported in another part, the undertaking may refer in one part to information presented in another part, avoiding duplications. The undertaking may apply the detailed structure illustrated in Appendix F of this Standard. |
116. |
The disclosures required by sector-specific ESRS shall be grouped by reporting area and, where applicable, by sustainability topic. They shall be presented alongside the disclosures required by ESRS 2 and the corresponding topical ESRS. |
117. |
Where the undertaking develops material entity-specific disclosures in accordance with paragraph 11 it shall report those disclosures alongside the most relevant sector-agnostic and sector-specific disclosures. |
9. Linkages with other parts of corporate reporting and connected information
118. |
The undertaking shall provide information that enables users of its sustainability statement to understand the connections between different pieces of information in the statement, and the connections between the information in the sustainability statement and other information that the undertaking discloses in other parts of its corporate reporting. |
9.1 Incorporation by reference
119. |
Provided that the conditions in paragraph 120 are met, information prescribed by a Disclosure Requirement of an ESRS, including a specific datapoint prescribed by a Disclosure Requirement, may be incorporated in the
sustainability statement
by reference to:
|
120. |
The undertaking may incorporate information by reference to the documents, or part of the documents, listed in paragraph 119, provided that the disclosures incorporated by reference:
|
121. |
Provided that the conditions established in paragraph 120 are met, information prescribed by a Disclosure Requirement of an ESRS, including a specific datapoint prescribed by a Disclosure Requirement, may be incorporated in the sustainability statement by reference to the undertaking’s report prepared according to EU Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) Regulation (EU) No 1221/2009 (12). In this case, the undertaking shall ensure that the information incorporated by reference is produced using the same basis for preparation of ESRS information, including scope of consolidation and treatment of value chain information. |
122. |
In the preparation of its sustainability statement using incorporation by reference, the undertaking shall consider the overall cohesiveness of the reported information and ensure that the incorporation by reference does not impair the readability of the sustainability statement. Appendix G Example of incorporation by reference of this Standard is an illustrative example of incorporation by reference (See ESRS 2 BP-2). |
9.2 Connected information and connectivity with financial statements
123. |
The undertaking shall describe the relationships between different pieces of information. Doing so could require connecting narrative information on governance, strategy and risk management to related metrics and targets . For example, in providing connected information, the undertaking may need to explain the effect or likely effect of its strategy on its financial statements or financial plans, or explain how its strategy relates to metrics and targets used to measure progress against performance. Furthermore, the undertaking may need to explain how its use of natural resources and changes within its supply chain could amplify, change or reduce its material impacts, risks and opportunities. It may need to link this information to information about current or anticipated financial effects on its production costs, to its strategic response to mitigate such impacts or risks, and to its related investment in new assets. The undertaking may also need to link narrative information to the related metrics and targets and to information in the financial statements. Information that describes connections shall be clear and concise. |
124. |
When the sustainability statement includes monetary amounts or other quantitative data points that exceed a threshold of materiality and that are presented in the financial statements (direct connectivity between information disclosed in sustainability statement and information disclosed in financial statements), the undertaking shall include a reference to the relevant paragraph of its financial statements where the corresponding information can be found. |
125. |
The sustainability statement may include monetary amounts or other quantitative datapoints that exceed a threshold of materiality and that are either an aggregation of, or a part of, monetary amounts or quantitative data presented in the undertaking’s financial statements (indirect connectivity between information disclosed in sustainability statement and information disclosed in financial statements). If this is the case, the undertaking shall explain how these amounts or datapoints in the sustainability statement relate to the most relevant amounts presented in the financial statements. This disclosure shall include a reference to the line item and/or to the relevant paragraphs of its financial statements where the corresponding information can be found. Where appropriate, a reconciliation may be provided, and it may be presented in a tabular form. |
126. |
In the case of information not covered by paragraphs 124 and 125, the undertaking shall explain, based on a threshold of materiality, the consistency of significant data, assumptions, and qualitative information included in its
sustainability statement
with the corresponding data, assumptions and qualitative information included in the financial statements. This may occur when the sustainability statement includes:
|
127. |
Consistency as required by paragraph 126 shall be at the level of a single datapoint and shall include a reference to the relevant line item or paragraph of notes to the financial statements. When significant data, assumptions and qualitative information are not consistent, the undertaking shall state that fact and explain the reason. |
128. |
Examples of items for which the explanation in paragraph 126 is required, are:
|
129. |
Topical and sector-specific ESRS may include requirements to include reconciliations or to illustrate consistency of data and assumptions for specific Disclosure Requirements. In such cases, the requirements in those ESRS shall prevail. |
10 Transitional provisions
10.1 Transitional provision related to entity-specific disclosures
130. |
The extent to which sustainability matters are covered by ESRS is expected to evolve as further Disclosure Requirements are developed. Therefore, the need for entity-specific disclosures is likely to decrease over time, in particular as a result of the future adoption of sector specific standards. |
131. |
When defining its entity-specific disclosures, the undertaking may adopt transitional measures for their preparation in the first three annual
sustainability statements
under which it may as a priority:
|
10.2 Transitional provision related to chapter 5 Value chain
132. |
For the first 3 years of the undertaking’s sustainability reporting under the ESRS, in the event that not all the necessary information regarding its upstream and downstream value chain is available, the undertaking shall explain the efforts made to obtain the necessary information about its upstream and downstream value chain, the reasons why not all of the necessary information could be obtained, and its plans to obtain the necessary information in the future. |
133. |
For the first 3 years of its sustainability reporting under the ESRS, in order to take account of the difficulties that undertakings may encounter in gathering information from actors throughout their
value chain
and in order to limit the burden for SMEs in the value chain:
|
134. |
Paragraphs 132 and 133 apply irrespective of whether or not the relevant actor in the value chain is an SME. |
135. |
Starting from the fourth year of its reporting under the ESRS, the undertaking shall include upstream and/or downstream value chain information according to paragraph 63. In this context, the information required by ESRS to be obtained from SME undertakings in the undertaking’s upstream and/or downstream value chain will not exceed the content of the future ESRS for listed SMEs. |
10.3 Transitional provision related to section 7.1 Presenting comparative information
136. |
To ease the first-time application of this Standard, the undertaking is not required to disclose the comparative information required by section 7.1 Presenting comparative information in the first year of preparation of the sustainability statement under the ESRS. For disclosure requirements listed in Appendix C List of phased-in Disclosure Requirements, this transitional provision applies with reference to the first year of mandatory application of the phased-in disclosure requirement. |
10.4 Transitional provision: List of Disclosure Requirements that are phased-in
137. |
Appendix C List of phased-in Disclosure Requirements in this Standard sets phase-in provisions for the Disclosure Requirements or datapoints of Disclosure Requirements in ESRS that may be omitted or that are not applicable in the first year(s) of preparation of the sustainability statement under the ESRS. |
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This appendix is an integral part of ESRS 1 and has the same authority as the other parts of the Standard.
Entity specific disclosures
AR 1. |
The entity-specific disclosures shall enable users to understand the undertaking’s impacts, risks and opportunities in relation to environmental, social or governance matters. |
AR 2. |
When developing entity-specific disclosures, the undertaking shall ensure that:
|
AR 3. |
When determining the usefulness of
metrics
for inclusion in its entity-specific disclosures, the undertaking shall consider whether:
|
AR 4. |
When developing its entity-specific disclosures, the undertaking shall carefully consider:
|
AR 5. |
Further guidance for developing entity-specific disclosures can be found by considering the information required under topical ESRS that addresses similar sustainability matters. |
Double materiality
Stakeholders and their relevance to the materiality assessment process
AR 6. |
In addition to the categories of stakeholder listed in paragraph 22, common categories of stakeholders are: employees and other workers, suppliers , consumers , customers, end- users , local communities and persons in vulnerable situations, and public authorities, including regulators, supervisors and central banks. |
AR 7. |
Nature may be considered as a silent stakeholder . In this case, ecological data and data on the conservation of species may support the undertaking’s materiality assessment. |
AR 8. |
Materiality assessment is informed by dialogue with affected stakeholders. The undertaking may engage with affected stakeholders or their representatives (such as employees or trade unions), along with users of sustainability reporting and other experts, to provide inputs or feedback on its conclusions regarding its material impacts, risks and opportunities . |
Assessment of impact materiality
AR 9. |
In assessing
impact materiality
and determining the material matters to be reported, the undertaking shall consider the following three steps:
|
Characteristics of severity
AR 10. |
The severity is determined by the following factors:
|
AR 11. |
Any of the three characteristics (scale, scope, and irremediable character) can make a negative impact severe. In the case of a potential negative human rights impact, the severity of the impact takes precedence over its likelihood. |
Impacts connected with the undertaking
AR 12. |
As an illustration:
|
Assessment of financial materiality
AR 13. |
The following are examples of how impacts and
dependencies
are sources of
risks
or
opportunities
:
|
AR 14. |
The identification of
risks
and
opportunities
that affect or could reasonably be expected to affect the undertaking’s financial position, financial performance, cash flows, access to finance or cost of capital over the short-, medium- or long-term is the starting point for
financial materiality
assessment. In this context, the undertaking shall consider:
|
AR 15. |
Once the undertaking has identified its
risks
and
opportunities
, it shall determine which of them are material for reporting. This shall be based on a combination of (i) the likelihood of occurrence and (ii) the potential magnitude of
financial effects
determined on the basis of appropriate thresholds. In this step it shall consider the contribution of those risks and opportunities to financial effects in the short-, medium- and long-term based on:
|
Sustainability matters to be included in the materiality assessment
AR 16. |
When performing its
materiality
assessment, the undertaking shall consider the following list of
sustainability matters
covered in the topical ESRS. When, as a result of the undertaking’s materiality assessment (see ESRS 2 IRO-1), a given sustainability matter in this list is assessed to be material, the undertaking shall report according to the corresponding Disclosure Requirements of the relevant topical ESRS. Using this list is not a substitute for the process of determining material matters. This list is a tool to support the undertaking’s materiality assessment. The undertaking still needs to consider its own specific circumstances when determining its material matters. The undertaking, where necessary, also shall develop entity-specific disclosures on material
impacts
,
risks
and
opportunities
not covered by ESRS as described in paragraph 11 of this Standard.
|
Estimation using sector averages and proxies
AR 17. |
When the undertaking cannot collect upstream and downstream value chain information as required by paragraph 63 after making reasonable efforts to do so, it shall estimate the information to be reported using all reasonable and supportable information that is available to the undertaking at the reporting date without undue cost or effort. This includes, but is not limited to, internal and external information, such as data from indirect sources, sector-average data, sample analyses, market and peer groups data, other proxies or spend-based data. |
Content and structure of the sustainability statement
AR 18. |
As an illustration for paragraph 115 in section 8.2 Content and structure of the sustainability statement of this Standard, the undertaking that covers environmental and social matters in the same policy may cross-refer. That means that the undertaking may report on the policy in its environmental disclosures and cross-refer to it from the relevant social disclosures or vice versa. Consolidated presentation of policies across topics is allowed. |
Appendix B
Qualitative characteristics of information
This appendix is an integral part of ESRS 1 and has the same authority as the other parts of the Standard. This appendix defines the qualitative characteristics that the information presented in the sustainability statement prepared according to ESRS shall meet.
Relevance
QC 1. |
Sustainability information is relevant when it may make a difference in the decisions of users under a double materiality approach (see chapter 3 of this Standard). |
QC 2. |
Information may make a difference in a decision even if some users choose not to take advantage of it or are already aware of it from other sources. Sustainability information may impact decisions of users if it has predictive value, confirmatory value or both. Information has predictive value if it can be used as an input to processes employed by users to predict future outcomes. Sustainability information does not need to be a prediction or forecast to have predictive value, but rather has predictive value if employed by users in making their own predictions. |
QC 3. |
Information has confirmatory value if it provides feedback about (confirms or changes) previous evaluations. |
QC 4. |
Materiality is an entity-specific aspect of relevance based on the nature or magnitude, or both, of the items to which the information relates, as assessed in the context of the undertaking’s sustainability reporting (see chapter 3 of this Standard). |
Faithful representation
QC 5. |
To be useful, the information must not only represent relevant phenomena, it must also faithfully represent the substance of the phenomena that it purports to represent. Faithful representation requires information to be (i) complete, (ii) neutral and (iii) accurate. |
QC 6. |
A complete depiction of an impact, a risk or an opportunity includes all material information necessary for the users to understand that impact, risk or opportunity. This includes how the undertaking has adapted its strategy, risk management and governance in response to that impact, risk or opportunity, as well as the metrics identified to set targets and measure performance. |
QC 7. |
A neutral depiction is without bias in its selection or disclosure of information. Information is neutral if it is not slanted, weighted, emphasised, de-emphasised or otherwise manipulated to make it more likely that the users will receive that information favourably or unfavourably. It shall be balanced, so as to cover favourable/positive and unfavourable/negative aspects. Both negative and positive material impacts from an impact materiality perspective as well as material risks and opportunities from a financial materiality perspective shall receive equal attention. Any aspirational sustainability information, for example targets or plans, shall cover both aspirations and factors that could prevent the undertaking from achieving these aspirations in order to have a neutral depiction. |
QC 8. |
Neutrality is supported by the exercise of prudence which is the exercise of caution when making judgements under conditions of uncertainty. Information shall not be netted or compensated to be neutral. The exercise of prudence means that opportunities are not overstated and risks are not understated. Equally, the exercise of prudence does not allow for the understatement of opportunities or the overstatement of risks. The undertaking may present net information, in addition to gross values, if such presentation does not obscure relevant information and includes a clear explanation about the effects of the netting and the reasons for the netting. |
QC 9. |
Information can be accurate without being perfectly precise in all respects. Accurate information implies that the undertaking has implemented adequate processes and internal controls to avoid material errors or material misstatements. As such, estimates shall be presented with a clear emphasis on their possible limitations and associated uncertainty (see section 7.2 of this Standard). The amount of precision needed and attainable, and the factors that make information accurate, depend on the nature of the information and the nature of the matters it addresses. For example, accuracy requires that:
|
Comparability
QC 10. |
Sustainability information is comparable when it can be compared with information provided by the undertaking in previous periods and, can be compared with information provided by other undertakings, in particular those with similar activities or operating within the same industry. A point of reference for comparison can be a target, a baseline, an industry benchmark, comparable information from either other undertakings or from an internationally recognised organisation, etc. |
QC 11. |
Consistency is related to, but is not the same as, comparability. Consistency refers to the use of the same approaches or methods for the same sustainability matter, from period to period by the undertaking and other undertakings. Consistency helps to achieve the goal of comparability. |
QC 12. |
Comparability is not uniformity. For information to be comparable, like components shall look alike and different components shall look different. Comparability of sustainability information is not enhanced by making unlike things look alike any more than it is enhanced by making like things look different. |
Verifiability
QC 13. |
Verifiability helps to give users confidence that information is complete, neutral and accurate. Sustainability information is verifiable if it is possible to corroborate the information itself or the inputs used to derive it. |
QC 14. |
Verifiability means that various knowledgeable and independent observers could reach consensus, although not necessarily complete agreement, that a particular depiction is a faithful representation. Sustainability information shall be provided in a way that enhances its verifiability, for example:
|
QC 15. |
Some sustainability information will be in the form of explanations or forward-looking information. Those disclosures can be supportable by faithfully representing on a factual basis for example the strategies, plans and risk analyses of the undertaking. To help users decide whether to use such information, the undertaking shall describe the underlying assumptions and methods of producing the information, as well as other factors that provide evidence that it reflects the actual plans or decisions made by the undertaking. |
Understandability
QC 16. |
Sustainability information is understandable when it is clear and concise. Understandable information enables any reasonably knowledgeable user to readily comprehend the information being communicated. |
QC 17. |
For sustainability disclosures to be concise, they need to (a) avoid generic “boilerplate” information, which is not specific to the undertaking; (b) avoid unnecessary duplication of information, including information also provided in financial statements; and (c) use clear language and well-structured sentences and paragraphs. Concise disclosures shall only include material information. Complementary information presented pursuant to paragraph 113 shall be provided in a way that avoids obscuring material information. |
QC 18. |
Clarity might be enhanced by distinguishing information about developments in the reporting period from “standing” information that remains relatively unchanged from one period to the next. This can be done, for example, by separately describing features of the undertaking’s sustainability-related governance and risk management processes that have changed since the previous reporting period compared to those that remain unchanged. |
QC 19. |
The completeness, clarity and comparability of sustainability disclosures all rely on information being presented as a coherent whole. For sustainability disclosures to be coherent, they shall be presented in a way that explains the context and the connections between the related information. Coherence also requires the undertaking to provide information in a way that allows users to relate information about its sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities to information in the undertaking’s financial statements. |
QC 20. |
If sustainability-related risks and opportunities discussed in the financial statements have implications for sustainability reporting, the undertaking shall include in the sustainability statement the information necessary for users to assess those implications and present appropriate links to the financial statements (see chapter 9 of this Standard). The level of information, granularity and technicality shall be aligned with the needs and expectations of users. Abbreviations shall be avoided and the units of measure shall be defined and disclosed. |
Appendix C
List of phased-in Disclosure Requirements
This appendix is an integral part of ESRS 1 and has the same authority as the other parts of the Standard.
ESRS |
Disclosure Requirement |
Full name of the Disclosure Requirement |
Phase-in or effective date (including the first year) |
ESRS 2 |
SBM-1 |
Strategy, business model and value chain |
The undertaking shall report the information prescribed by ESRS 2 SBM-1 paragraph 40(b) (breakdown of total revenue by significant ESRS sector) and 40(c) (list of additional significant ESRS sectors) starting from the application date specified in a Commission Delegated Act to be adopted pursuant to article 29b(1) third subparagraph, point (ii), of Directive 2013/34/EU. |
ESRS 2 |
SBM-3 |
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
The undertaking may omit the information prescribed by ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48(e) (anticipated financial effects) for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. The undertaking may comply with ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48(e) by reporting only qualitative disclosures for the first 3 years of preparation of its sustainability statement, if it is impracticable to prepare quantitative disclosures. |
ESRS E1 |
E1-6 |
Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions |
Undertakings or groups not exceeding on their balance sheet dates the average number of 750 employees during the financial year (on a consolidated basis where applicable) may omit the datapoints on scope 3 emissions and total GHG emissions for the first year of preparation of their sustainability statement. |
ESRS E1 |
E1-9 |
Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities |
The undertaking may omit the information prescribed by ESRS E1-9 for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. The undertaking may comply with ESRS E1-9 by reporting only qualitative disclosures for the first 3 years of preparation of its sustainability statement, if it is impracticable to prepare quantitative disclosures. |
ESRS E2 |
E2-6 |
Anticipated financial effects from pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
The undertaking may omit the information prescribed by ESRS E2-6 for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. Except for the information prescribed by paragraph 40 (b) on the operating and capital expenditures occurred in the reporting period in conjunction with major incidents and deposits, the undertaking may comply with ESRS E2-6 by reporting only qualitative disclosures, for the first 3 years of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS E3 |
E3-5 |
Anticipated financial effects from water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
The undertaking may omit the information prescribed by ESRS E3-5 for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement.The undertaking may comply with ESRS E3-5 by reporting only qualitative disclosures, for the first 3 years of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS E4 |
All disclosure requirements |
All disclosure requirements |
Undertakings or groups not exceeding on their balance sheet dates the average number of 750 employees during the financial year (on a consolidated basis where applicable) may omit the information specified in the disclosure requirements of ESRS E4 for the first 2 years of preparation of their sustainability statement. |
ESRS E4 |
E4-6 |
Anticipated financial effects from biodiversity and ecosystem-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
The undertaking may omit the information prescribed by ESRS E4-6 for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. The undertaking may comply with ESRS E4-6 by reporting only qualitative disclosures, for the first 3 years of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS E5 |
E5-6 |
Anticipated financial effects from resource use and circular economy-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
The undertaking may omit the information prescribed by ESRS E5-6 for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. The undertaking may comply with ESRS E5-6 by reporting only qualitative disclosures, for the first 3 years of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS S1 |
All disclosure requirements |
All disclosure requirements |
Undertakings or groups not exceeding on their balance sheet dates the average number of 750 employees during the financial year (on a consolidated basis where applicable) may omit the information specified in the disclosure requirements of ESRS S1 for the first year of preparation of their sustainability statement. |
ESRS S1 |
S1-7 |
Characteristics of non-employee workers in the undertaking’s own workforce |
The undertaking may omit reporting for all datapoints in this Disclosure Requirement for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS S1 |
S1-8 |
Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue |
The undertaking may omit this Disclosure Requirement with regard to its own employees in non-EEA countries for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS S1 |
S1-11 |
Social protection |
The undertaking may omit the information prescribed by ESRS S1-11 for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS S1 |
S1-12 |
Percentage of employees with disabilities |
The undertaking may omit the information prescribed by ESRS S1-12 for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS S1 |
S1-13 |
Training and skills development |
The undertaking may omit the information prescribed by ESRS S1-13 for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS S1 |
S1-14 |
Health and safety |
The undertaking may omit the data points on cases of work-related ill-health and on number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities and work-related ill health for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS S1 |
S1-14 |
Health and safety |
The undertaking may omit reporting on non-employees for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS S1 |
S1-15 |
Work-life balance |
The undertaking may omit the information prescribed by ESRS S1-15 for the first year of preparation of its sustainability statement. |
ESRS S2 |
All disclosure requirements |
All disclosure requirements |
Undertakings or groups not exceeding on their balance sheet dates the average number of 750 employees during the financial year (on a consolidated basis where applicable) may omit the information specified in the disclosure requirements of ESRS S2 for the first 2 years of preparation of their sustainability statement. |
ESRS S3 |
All disclosure requirements |
All disclosure requirements |
Undertakings or groups not exceeding on their balance sheet dates the average number of 750 employees during the financial year (on a consolidated basis where applicable) may omit the information specified in the disclosure requirements of ESRS S3 for the first 2 years of preparation of their sustainability statement. |
ESRS S4 |
All disclosure requirements |
All disclosure requirements |
Undertakings or groups not exceeding on their balance sheet dates the average number of 750 employees during the financial year (on a consolidated basis where applicable) may omit the information specified in the disclosure requirements of ESRS S4 for the first 2 years of preparation of their sustainability statement. |
Appendix D
Structure of the ESRS sustainability statement
This appendix is an integral part of ESRS 1 and has the same authority as the other parts of the Standard with respect to reporting in four parts as outlined in paragraph 115.
Part of the management report |
ESRS codification |
Title |
||
|
ESRS 2 |
General disclosures, including information provided under the Application Requirements of topical ESRS listed in ESRS 2 Appendix C. |
||
|
Not applicable |
Disclosures pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation) |
||
|
ESRS E1 |
Climate change |
||
|
ESRS E2 |
Pollution |
||
|
ESRS E3 |
Water and marine resources |
||
|
ESRS E4 |
Biodiversity and ecosystems |
||
|
ESRS E5 |
Resource use and circular economy |
||
|
ESRS S1 |
Own workforce |
||
|
ESRS S2 |
Workers in the value chain |
||
|
ESRS S3 |
Affected communities |
||
|
ESRS S4 |
Consumers and end-users |
||
|
ESRS G1 |
Business conduct |
Appendix E
Flowchart for determining disclosures under ESRS
Materiality assessment is the starting point for sustainability reporting under ESRS. This appendix provides a non-binding illustration of the impact- and financial materiality assessment outlined in chapter 3. IRO-1 in section 4.1 of ESRS 2 includes general disclosure requirements (DR) about the undertaking’s process to identify impacts, risks and opportunities and assess their materiality. SBM-3 of ESRS 2 provides general disclosures requirements on the material impact, risks and opportunities resulting from the undertaking’s materiality assessment. The undertaking can omit all disclosure requirements in a topical standard if it assessed that the topic in question is not material. In that case it may disclose a brief explanation of the conclusions of the materiality assessment for that topic but shall disclose a detailed explanation in the case of ESRS E1 climate change (IRO-2 ESRS 2). ESRS set disclosure requirements, not behavioral requirements. Disclosure requirements in relation to action plans , targets , policies , scenario analysis and transition plans are proportionate because they are contingent on the undertaking having these, which may depend on the size, capacity, resources, and skills of the undertaking. Note: The flowchart below does not cover the situation in which the undertaking assesses a sustainability matter as material but it is not covered by a topical standard, in which case the undertaking shall make additional entity specific disclosures (ESRS 1 (30 (b)).
Appendix F
Example of structure of ESRS sustainability statement
This appendix complements ESRS 1. It provides a non-binding illustration of the structure of the sustainability statement outlined in section 8.2 of this Standard. In this illustration, the undertaking has concluded that biodiversity and ecosystems, pollution, and affected communities, are not material.
Appendix G
Example of incorporation by reference
This appendix complements ESRS 1. It provides non-binding illustrations of incorporation by reference of another section of the management report into the sustainability statement as outlined in section 9.1 of this Standard.
ESRS 2
GENERAL DISCLOSURES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
1. |
Basis for preparation |
– |
Disclosure Requirement BP-1 – General basis for preparation of sustainability statements |
– |
Disclosure Requirement BP-2 – Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances |
2. |
Governance |
– |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-1 – The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies |
– |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-2 – Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies |
– |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-3 - Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes |
– |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-4 - Statement on due diligence |
– |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-5 - Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting |
3. |
Strategy |
– |
Disclosure Requirement SBM-1 – Strategy, business model and value chain |
– |
Disclosure Requirement SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders |
– |
Disclosure Requirement SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
4. |
Impact, risk and opportunity management |
4.1 |
Disclosures on the materiality assessment process |
– |
Disclosure Requirement IRO-1 - Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities |
– |
Disclosure Requirement IRO-2 – Disclosure requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement |
4.2 |
Minimum disclosure requirement on policies and actions |
– |
Minimum disclosure requirement - Policies MDR-P – Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters |
– |
Minimum disclosure requirement - Actions MDR-A – Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters |
5. |
Metrics and targets |
– |
Minimum disclosure requirement – Metrics MDR-M – Metrics in relation to material sustainability matters |
– |
Minimum disclosure requirement – Targets MDR-T – Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
1. |
Basis for preparation |
– |
Disclosure Requirement BP-1 – General basis for preparation of the sustainability statement |
2. |
Governance |
– |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-1 – The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies |
– |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-2 – Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies |
– |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-3 – Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes |
– |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-4 – Statement on due diligence |
– |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-5 – Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting |
3. |
Strategy |
– |
Disclosure Requirement SBM–1 Strategy, business model and value chain |
– |
Disclosure Requirement SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders |
– |
Disclosure Requirement SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
4. |
Impact, risk and opportunity management |
– |
Disclosure Requirement IRO-2 – Disclosure requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement |
– |
Minimum Disclosure Requirement - Policies MDR-P – Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters |
– |
Minimum Disclosure Requirement - Actions MDR-A – Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters |
5. |
Metrics and targets |
– |
Minimum Disclosure Requirement - Targets MDR-T – Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets |
Appendix B: |
List of datapoints in cross-cutting and topical standards that derive from other EU legislation |
Appendix C: |
Disclosure/Application Requirements in topical ESRS that are applicable jointly with ESRS 2 General Disclosures |
Objective
1. |
This ESRS sets out the disclosure requirements that apply to all undertakings regardless of their sector of activity (i.e., sector agnostic) and apply across sustainability topics (i.e., cross-cutting). This ESRS covers the reporting areas defined in ESRS 1 General requirements section 1.2 Cross-Cutting Standards and reporting areas. |
2. |
In the preparation of disclosures under this Standard, the undertaking shall apply the Disclosure Requirements (including their datapoints) set in topical ESRS, as listed in Appendix C of this Standard Disclosure/Application Requirements in topical ESRS that are applicable jointly with ESRS 2 General Disclosures. The undertaking shall apply the requirements listed in Appendix C:
|
1. Basis for preparation
Disclosure Requirement BP-1 – General basis for preparation of the sustainability statement
3. |
The undertaking shall disclose the general basis for preparation of its sustainability statement. |
4. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of how the undertaking prepares its sustainability statement , including the scope of consolidation, the upstream and downstream value chain information and, where relevant, whether the undertaking has used any of the options for omitting information referred to in points d) and e) in the following paragraph. |
5. |
The undertaking shall disclose the following information:
|
Disclosure Requirement BP-2 – Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances
6. |
The undertaking shall provide disclosures in relation to specific circumstances. |
7. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the effect of these specific circumstances on the preparation of the sustainability statement . |
8. |
The undertaking may report this information alongside the disclosures to which they refer. |
Time horizons
9. |
When the undertaking has deviated from the medium- or long-term time horizons defined by ESRS 1 section 6.4 Definition of short-, medium- and long-term for reporting purposes, it shall describe:
|
Value chain estimation
10. |
When
metrics
include upstream and/or downstream
value chain
data estimated using indirect sources, such as sector-average data or other proxies, the undertaking shall:
|
Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty
11. |
In accordance with ESRS 1 section 7.2 Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty, the undertaking shall:
|
12. |
When disclosing forward-looking information, the undertaking may indicate that it considers such information to be uncertain. |
Changes in preparation or presentation of sustainability information
13. |
When changes in the preparation and presentation of sustainability information occur compared to the previous reporting period(s), (see ESRS 1 section 7.4 Changes in preparation or presentation in sustainability information), the undertaking shall:
|
Reporting errors in prior periods
14. |
When the undertaking identifies material prior period errors (see ESRS 1 section 7.5 Reporting errors in prior periods), it shall disclose:
|
Disclosures stemming from other legislation or generally accepted sustainability reporting pronouncements
15. |
When the undertaking includes in its sustainability statement information stemming from other legislation which requires the undertaking to disclose sustainability information or from generally accepted sustainability reporting standards and frameworks (see ESRS 1 section 8.2 Content and structure of the sustainability statement), in addition to the information prescribed by ESRS, it shall disclose this fact. In case of partial application of other reporting standards or frameworks, the undertaking shall provide a precise reference to the paragraphs of the standard or framework applied. |
Incorporation by reference
16. |
When the undertaking incorporates information by reference (see ESRS 1 section 9.1 Incorporation by reference), it shall disclose a list of the disclosure requirements of ESRS, or the specific datapoints mandated by a Disclosure Requirement, that have been incorporated by reference. |
Use of phase-In provisions in accordance with Appendix C of ESRS 1
17. |
If an undertaking or group not exceeding on its balance sheet date the average number of 750 employees during the financial year decides to omit the information required by ESRS E4, ESRS S1, ESRS S2, ESRS S3 or ESRS S4 in accordance with Appendix C of ESRS 1, it shall nevertheless disclose whether the sustainability topics covered respectively by ESRS E4, ESRS S1, ESRS S2, ESRS S3 and ESRS S4 have been assessed to be material as a result of the undertaking’s materiality assessment. In addition, if one or more of these topics has been assessed to be material, the undertaking shall, for each material topic:
|
2. Governance
18. |
The objective of this chapter is to set disclosure requirements that enable an understanding of the governance processes, controls and procedures put in place to monitor, manage and oversee sustainability matters . |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-1 – The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
19. |
The undertaking shall disclose the composition of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies, their roles and responsibilities and access to expertise and skills with regard to sustainability matters. |
20. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
|
21. |
The undertaking shall disclose the following information about the composition and diversity of the members of the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies:
|
22. |
The undertaking shall disclose the following information about the roles and responsibilities of the
administrative, management and supervisory bodies
:
|
23. |
The disclosure shall include a description of how the
administrative, management and supervisory bodies
determine whether appropriate skills and expertise are available or will be developed to oversee
sustainability matters
, including:
|
Disclosure Requirement GOV-2 – Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies
24. |
The undertaking shall disclose how the administrative, management and supervisory bodies are informed about sustainability matters and how these matters were addressed during the reporting period. |
25. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of how administrative, management and supervisory bodies are informed about sustainability matters , as well as what information and matters they addressed during the reporting period. This in turn allows an understanding of whether the members of these bodies were adequately informed and whether they were able to fulfil their roles. |
26. |
The undertaking shall disclose the following information:
|
Disclosure Requirement GOV-3 – Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes
27. |
The undertaking shall disclose information about the integration of its sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes. |
28. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of whether incentive schemes are offered to members of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies that are linked to sustainability matters . |
29. |
The undertaking shall disclose the following information about the incentive schemes and remuneration
policies
linked to
sustainability matters
for members of the undertaking's
administrative, management and supervisory bodies
, where they exist:
|
Disclosure Requirement GOV–4 - Statement on due diligence
30. |
The undertaking shall disclose a mapping of the information provided in its sustainability statement about the due diligence process. |
31. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to facilitate an understanding of the undertaking’s due diligence process with regard to sustainability matters . |
32. |
The main aspects and steps of due diligence referred to under ESRS 1 chapter 4 Due diligence are related to a number of cross-cutting and topical Disclosure Requirements under the ESRS. The undertaking shall provide a mapping that explains how and where its application of the main aspects and steps of the due diligence process are reflected in its sustainability statement, to allow a depiction of the actual practices of the undertaking with regard to due diligence (15). |
33. |
This disclosure requirement does not mandate any specific behavioural requirements with regard to due diligence actions and does not extend or modify the role of administrative, management and supervisory bodies as mandated by other legislation or regulation. |
Disclosure Requirement GOV–5 - Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting
34. |
The undertaking shall disclose the main features of its risk management and internal control system in relation to the sustainability reporting process. |
35. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the undertaking’s risk management and internal control processes in relation to sustainability reporting. |
36. |
The undertaking shall disclose the following information:
|
3. Strategy
37. |
This chapter sets disclosure requirements that enable an understanding of:
|
Disclosure Requirement SBM-1 – Strategy, business model and value chain
38. |
The undertaking shall disclose the elements of its strategy that relate to or impact sustainability matters, its business model and its value chain. |
39. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to describe the key elements of the undertaking’s general strategy that relate to or affect sustainability matters , and the key elements of the undertaking’s business model and value chain , in order to provide an understanding of its exposure to impacts, risks and opportunities and where they originate. |
40. |
The undertaking shall disclose the following information about the key elements of its general strategy that relate to or affect
sustainability matters
:
|
41. |
If the undertaking is based in an EU Member State that allows for an exemption from the disclosure of the information referred to in Article 18, paragraph 1, sub-point (a) of Directive 2013/34/EU (22), and if the undertaking has made use of that exemption, it may omit the breakdown of revenue by significant ESRS sector required by paragraph 40(b). In this case the undertaking shall nevertheless disclose the list of ESRS sectors that are significant for the undertaking. |
42. |
The undertaking shall disclose a description of its
business model
and
value chain
, including:
|
Disclosure Requirement SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
43. |
The undertaking shall disclose how the interests and views of its stakeholders are taken into account by the undertaking’s strategy and business model. |
44. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of how stakeholders ’ interests and views inform the undertaking’s strategy and business model . |
45. |
The undertaking shall disclose a summarised description of:
|
Disclosure Requirement SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
46. |
The undertaking shall disclose its material impacts, risks and opportunities and how they interact with its strategy and business model. |
47. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the material impacts, risks and opportunities as they result from the undertaking’s materiality assessment and how they originate from and trigger adaptation of the undertaking’s strategy and business model including its resources allocation. The information to be disclosed about the management of the undertaking’s material impacts, risks and opportunities is prescribed in topical ESRS and in sector-specific standards, which shall be applied in conjunction with the Minimum Disclosure Requirements on policies, actions and targets established in this Standard. |
48. |
The undertaking shall disclose:
|
49. |
The undertaking may disclose the descriptive information required in paragraph 46 alongside the disclosures provided under the corresponding topical ESRS, in which case it shall still present a statement of its material impacts, risks and opportunities alongside its disclosures prepared under this chapter of ESRS 2. |
4. Impact, risk and opportunity management
4.1 Disclosures on the materiality assessment process
50. |
This chapter sets disclosure requirements that enable an understanding of:
|
Disclosure Requirement IRO-1 - Description of the process to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities
51. |
The undertaking shall disclose its process to identify its impacts, risks and opportunities and to assess which ones are material. |
52. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the process through which the undertaking identifies impacts, risks and opportunities and assesses their materiality, as the basis for determining the disclosures in its sustainability statement (see ESRS 1 chapter 3 and its related Application Requirements, which set out requirements and principles regarding the process to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities based on the principle of double materiality). |
53. |
The undertaking shall disclose the following information:
|
Disclosure Requirement IRO-2 – Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement
54. |
The undertaking shall report on the Disclosure Requirements complied with in its sustainability statements. |
55. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the Disclosure Requirements included in the undertaking’s sustainability statement and of the topics that have been omitted as not material, as a result of the materiality assessment. |
56. |
The undertaking shall include a list of the Disclosure Requirements complied with in preparing the sustainability statement , following the outcome of the materiality assessment (see ESRS 1 chapter 3), including the page numbers and/or paragraphs where the related disclosures are located in the sustainability statement. This may be presented as a content index. The undertaking shall also include a table of all the datapoints that derive from other EU legislation as listed in Appendix B of this standard, indicating where they can be found in the sustainability statement and including those that the undertaking has assessed as not material, in which case the undertaking shall indicate “Not material” in the table in accordance with ESRS 1 paragraph 35. |
57. |
If the undertaking concludes that climate change is not material and therefore omits all disclosure requirements in ESRS E1 Climate change, it shall disclose a detailed explanation of the conclusions of its materiality assessment with regard to climate change (see ESRS 2 IRO-2 Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement), including a forward-looking analysis of the conditions that could lead the undertaking to conclude that climate change is material in the future. |
58. |
If the undertaking concludes that a topic other than climate change is not material and therefore omits all the Disclosure Requirements in the corresponding topical ESRS, it may provide a brief explanation of the conclusions of its materiality assessment for that topic. |
59. |
The undertaking shall provide an explanation of how it has determined the material information to be disclosed in relation to the impacts, risks and opportunities that it has assessed to be material, including the use of thresholds and/or how it has implemented the criteria in ESRS 1 section 3.2 Material matters and materiality of information. |
4.2 Minimum disclosure requirements on policies and actions
60. |
This section sets out minimum disclosure requirements to be included when the undertaking discloses information on its policies and actions to prevent, mitigate and remediate actual and potential material impacts , to address material risks and/or to pursue material opportunities (collectively, to “manage material sustainability matters ”). They shall be applied together with the Disclosure Requirements, including Application Requirements, provided in the relevant topical and sector-specific ESRS. They shall also be applied when the undertaking prepares entity-specific disclosures. |
61. |
The corresponding disclosures shall be located alongside disclosures prescribed by the relevant ESRS. When a single policy or same actions address several interconnected sustainability matters , the undertaking may disclose the required information in its reporting under one topical ESRS and cross reference to it in its reporting under other topical ESRS. |
62. |
If the undertaking cannot disclose the information on policies and actions required under relevant ESRS, because it has not adopted policies and/or actions with reference to the specific sustainability matter concerned, it shall disclose this to be the case, and provide reasons for not having adopted policies and/or actions. The undertaking may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to adopt them. |
Minimum Disclosure Requirement – Policies MDR-P – Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters
63. |
The undertaking shall apply the minimum disclosure requirements defined in this provision when it discloses the policies it has in place with regard to each sustainability matter identified as material. |
64. |
The objective of this Minimum Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the policies that the undertaking has in place to prevent, mitigate and remediate actual and potential impacts , to address risks and to pursue opportunities . |
65. |
The undertaking shall disclose information about
policies
adopted to manage material
sustainability matters
. The disclosure shall include the following information:
|
Minimum Disclosure Requirement – Actions MDR-A – Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters
66. |
The undertaking shall apply the requirements for the content of disclosures in this provision when it describes the actions through which it manages each material sustainability matter including action plans and resources allocated and/or planned. |
67. |
The objective of this Minimum Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the key actions taken and/or planned to prevent, mitigate and remediate actual and potential impacts , and to address risks and opportunities , and where applicable achieve the objectives and targets of related policies . |
68. |
Where the implementation of a
policy
requires
actions
, or a comprehensive action plan, to achieve its objectives, as well as when actions are implemented without a specific policy, the undertaking shall disclose the following information:
|
69. |
Where the implementation of an action plan requires significant operational expenditures (Opex) and/or capital expenditures (Capex) the undertaking shall:
|
5. Metrics and targets
70. |
This chapter sets out Minimum Disclosure Requirements that shall be included when the undertaking discloses information on its metrics and targets related to each material sustainability matter. They shall be applied together with the Disclosure Requirements, including Application Requirements, provided in the relevant topical ESRS. They shall also be applied when the undertaking prepares entity-specific disclosures. |
71. |
The corresponding disclosures shall be located alongside disclosures prescribed by the topical ESRS. |
72. |
If the undertaking cannot disclose the information on targets required under the relevant topical ESRS, because it has not set targets with reference to the specific sustainability matter concerned, it shall disclose this to be the case, and provide reasons for not having adopted targets. The undertaking may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to adopt them. |
Minimum disclosure requirement – Metrics MDR-M – Metrics in relation to material sustainability matters
73. |
The undertaking shall apply the requirements for the content of disclosures in this provision when it discloses on the metrics it has in place with regard to each material sustainability matter . |
74. |
The objective of this Minimum Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the metrics the undertaking uses to track the effectiveness of its actions to manage material sustainability matters . |
75. |
The undertaking shall disclose any metrics that it uses to evaluate performance and effectiveness, in relation to a material impact, risk or opportunity. |
76. |
Metrics shall include those defined in ESRS, as well as metrics identified on an entity-specific basis, whether taken from other sources or developed by the undertaking itself. |
77. |
For each
metric
, the undertaking shall:
|
Minimum Disclosure Requirement – Targets MDR-T – Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets
78. |
The undertaking shall apply the requirements for the content of disclosures in this provision when it discloses information about the targets it has set with regard to each material sustainability matter. |
79. |
The objective of this
Minimum Disclosure Requirement
is to provide for each material
sustainability matter
an understanding of:
|
80. |
The undertaking shall disclose the measurable, outcome-oriented and time-bound
targets
on material
sustainability matters
it has set to assess progress. For each target, the disclosure shall include the following information:
|
81. |
If the undertaking has not set any measurable outcome-oriented
targets
:
|
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This appendix is an integral part of ESRS 2 and has the same authority as other parts of the Standard.
1. Basis for preparation
Disclosure Requirement BP-1 – General basis for preparation of sustainability statements
AR 1. |
When describing to what extent the
sustainability statement
covers the undertaking’s upstream and downstream
value chain
(see ESRS 1 section 5.1 Reporting undertaking and value chain), the undertaking may distinguish between:
|
Disclosure Requirement BP-2 – Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances
AR 2. |
The undertaking may disclose whether it relies on any European standards approved by the European Standardisation System (ISO/IEC or CEN/CENELEC standards), as well as the extent to which data and processes that are used for sustainability reporting purposes have been verified by an external assurance provider and found to conform to the corresponding ISO/IEC or CEN/CENELEC standard. |
2. Governance
Disclosure Requirement GOV-1 – The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
AR 3. |
In describing the role and responsibilities of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies with regard to
sustainability matters
, the undertaking may specify:
|
AR 4. |
In describing the undertaking’s organisation of governance regarding sustainability matters , a description of complex governance structure may be complemented by their presentation in the form of a diagram. |
AR 5. |
The description of the level of expertise or access to expertise of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies may be substantiated by illustrating the composition of the bodies, including members on whom these bodies rely for expertise to oversee sustainability matters , and how they leverage that expertise as a body. In the description, the undertaking shall consider how the expertise and skills are relevant to the undertaking’s material impacts, risks and opportunities and whether the bodies and/or its members have access to other sources of expertise, such as specific experts and training and other educational initiatives to update and develop sustainability-related expertise within these bodies. |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-2 – Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies
AR 6. |
Depending on the undertaking’s structure, the administrative, management and supervisory bodies may focus on overarching targets , while management focuses on the more detailed targets. In this case, the undertaking may disclose how the governance bodies ensure that an appropriate mechanism for performance monitoring is in place. |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-3 – Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes
AR 7. |
For listed undertakings, this Disclosure Requirement should be consistent with the remuneration report prescribed in articles 9a and 9b of Directive 2007/36/EC on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies. Subject to the provisions of ESRS 1, paragraphs 119, 120 and 122, a listed undertaking may make a reference to its remuneration report. |
Disclosure Requirement GOV-4 – Statement on due diligence
AR 8. |
The mapping required by paragraph 30 may be presented in the form of a table, cross-referencing the core elements of due diligence, for impacts on people and the environment, to the relevant disclosures in the undertaking’s sustainability statement , as set out below. |
AR 9. |
The undertaking may include additional columns to the table below to clearly identify those disclosures that relate to impacts on people and/or the environment given that, in some cases, more than one disclosure may provide information about the same due diligence step. |
AR 10. |
The main references in the international instruments of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises to the core elements of the due diligence process are listed in ESRS 1 chapter 4.
|
Disclosure Requirement GOV-5 – Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting
AR 11. |
This Disclosure Requirement focuses solely on the internal control processes over the sustainability reporting process. The undertaking may consider risks such as the completeness and integrity of the data, the accuracy of estimation results, the availability of upstream and/or downstream value chain data, and the timing of the availability of the information. |
3. Strategy
Disclosure Requirement SBM–1 Strategy, business model and value chain
AR 12. |
To provide the information on sectors required by paragraph 40, the undertaking shall map its significant activities in accordance with ESRS sectors. If a code for a sub-sector does not exist, the caption “others” shall be used. |
AR 13. |
For the purposes of the disclosures required in paragraph 40, a group of products and/or services offered, a group of markets and/or customer groups served, or an ESRS sector, is significant for the undertaking if it meets one or both of the following criteria:
|
AR 14. |
In preparing disclosures relating to its
business model
and
value chain
, the undertaking shall consider:
|
AR 15. |
Contextual information may be particularly relevant for users of the undertaking’s sustainability statement, to understand to what extent the disclosures include upstream and/or downstream value chain information. The description of the main features of the upstream and/or downstream value chain and where applicable the identification of key value chains should support an understanding of how the undertaking applies the requirements of ESRS 1 chapter 5 and the materiality assessment performed by the undertaking in line with ESRS 1 chapter 3. The description may provide a high-level overview of the key features of upstream and/or downstream value chain entities indicating their relative contribution to the undertaking’s performance and position and explaining how they contribute to the value creation of the undertaking. |
Disclosure Requirement SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
AR 16. |
The views and interests of stakeholders that are expressed as part of the undertaking’s engagement with stakeholders through its due diligence process may be relevant to one or more aspects of its strategy or business model. As such, they may affect the undertaking’s decisions regarding the future direction of the strategy or business model. |
Disclosure Requirement SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
AR 17. |
When describing where in its upstream and/or downstream value chain material impacts, risks and opportunities are concentrated, the undertaking shall consider: geographical areas, facilities or types of assets, inputs, outputs and distribution channels. |
AR 18. |
This disclosure may be expressed in terms of a single impact , risk or opportunity or by aggregating groups of material impacts, risks and opportunities, when this provides more relevant information and does not obscure material information. |
4. Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement IRO-2 – Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement
AR 19. |
Notwithstanding the basis for the presentation of the information about sustainability matters included in ESRS 1 chapter 8 Structure of sustainability statement, the undertaking may disclose the list of the Disclosure Requirements complied with in preparing the sustainability statement (see paragraph 54) in the general information part or in other parts of the sustainability statement as it deems appropriate. The undertaking may use a content index, i.e., a tabular list of the Disclosure Requirements included in the sustainability statement, with the indication of where they are located (page/paragraphs). |
Minimum Disclosure Requirement – Policies MDR-P – Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters
AR 20. |
Due to the interdependency between impacts on people and the environment, risks and opportunities , a single policy may apply to several material sustainability matters , including matters addressed by more than one topical ESRS. For example, if a single policy covers both an environmental matter and a social matter, the undertaking may report on the policy in the environmental section of its sustainability statement . In this case, it should include in the social section a cross-reference to the environmental section where the policy is reported. Equally a policy may be reported in the social section with a cross-reference to it in the environmental section. |
AR 21. |
The description of the scope of the policy may explain which activities and/or segments of the undertaking’s own operations or upstream and downstream value chain it concerns. The description may also explain further boundaries relevant to the specific topic or the undertaking’s circumstances, which may include geographies, life cycles, etc. In certain cases, such as if the policy does not cover the full value chain, the undertaking may provide clear information regarding the extent of the value chain covered by the policy. |
Minimum disclosure requirement – Actions MDR-A – Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters
AR 22. |
Key actions in the context of this Minimum Disclosure Requirement are those actions that materially contribute to achieving the undertaking’s objectives in addressing material impacts, risks and opportunities . For reasons of understandability, key actions may be aggregated where appropriate. |
AR 23. |
Information on resource allocation may be presented in the form of a table and broken down between capital expenditure and operating expenditure, and across the relevant time horizons, and between resources applied in the current reporting year and the planned allocation of resources over specific time horizons. |
5. Metrics and targets
Minimum Disclosure Requirement – Targets MDR-T – Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets
AR 24. |
When disclosing targets related to the prevention or mitigation of environmental impacts, the undertaking shall prioritise targets related to the reduction of the impacts in absolute terms rather than in relative terms. When targets address the prevention or mitigation of social impacts, they may be specified in terms of the effects on human rights, welfare or positive outcomes for affected stakeholders . |
AR 25. |
The information on progress made towards achieving the targets may be presented in a comprehensive table, including information on the baseline and target value, milestones, and achieved performance over the prior periods. |
AR 26. |
Where the undertaking describes progress in achieving the objectives of a policy in the absence of a measurable target, it may specify a baseline against which the progress is considered. For example, the undertaking may assess an increase of wages by a certain percentage for those below a fair wage; or may assess the quality of its relationships with local communities by reference to the proportion of issues raised by communities that were resolved to their satisfaction. The baseline and the assessment of the progress shall be related to the impacts, risks and opportunities which underpin the materiality of the matter addressed by the policy. |
Appendix B
List of datapoints in cross-cutting and topical standards that derive from other EU legislation
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS 2. The table below illustrates the datapoints in ESRS 2 and topical ESRS that derive from other EU legislation.
Disclosure Requirement and related datapoint |
SFDR (23) reference |
Pillar 3 (24) reference |
Benchmark Regulation (25) reference |
EU Climate Law (26) reference |
ESRS 2 GOV-1 Board's gender diversity paragraph 21 (d) |
Indicator number 13 of Table #1 of Annex 1 |
|
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 (27), Annex II |
|
ESRS 2 GOV-1 Percentage of board members who are independent paragraph 21 (e) |
|
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II |
|
ESRS 2 GOV-4 Statement on due diligence paragraph 30 |
Indicator number 10 Table #3 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to fossil fuel activities paragraph 40 (d) i |
Indicators number 4 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 (28)Table 1: Qualitative information on Environmental risk and Table 2: Qualitative information on Social risk |
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II |
|
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to chemical production paragraph 40 (d) ii |
Indicator number 9 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II |
|
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to controversial weapons paragraph 40 (d) iii |
Indicator number 14 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (29), Article 12(1) Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II |
|
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to cultivation and production of tobacco paragraph 40 (d) iv |
|
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 12(1) Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II |
|
ESRS E1-1 Transition plan to reach climate neutrality by 2050 paragraph 14 |
|
|
|
Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, Article 2(1) |
ESRS E1-1 Undertakings excluded from Paris-aligned Benchmarks paragraph 16 (g) |
|
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 1: Banking book-Climate Change transition risk: Credit quality of exposures by sector, emissions and residual maturity |
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article12.1 (d) to (g), and Article 12.2 |
|
ESRS E1-4 GHG emission reduction targets paragraph 34 |
Indicator number 4 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 3: Banking book – Climate change transition risk: alignment metrics |
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 6 |
|
ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption from fossil sources disaggregated by sources (only high climate impact sectors) paragraph 38 |
Indicator number 5 Table #1 and Indicator n. 5 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption and mix paragraph 37 |
Indicator number 5 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E1-5 Energy intensity associated with activities in high climate impact sectors paragraphs 40 to 43 |
Indicator number 6 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E1-6 Gross Scope 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions paragraph 44 |
Indicators number 1 and 2 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
Article 449a; Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 1: Banking book – Climate change transition risk: Credit quality of exposures by sector, emissions and residual maturity |
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 5(1), 6 and 8(1) |
|
ESRS E1-6 Gross GHG emissions intensity paragraphs 53 to 55 |
Indicators number 3 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 3: Banking book – Climate change transition risk: alignment metrics |
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 8(1) |
|
ESRS E1-7 GHG removals and carbon credits paragraph 56 |
|
|
|
Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, Article 2(1) |
ESRS E1-9 Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to climate-related physical risks paragraph 66 |
|
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II |
|
ESRS E1-9 Disaggregation of monetary amounts by acute and chronic physical risk paragraph 66 (a) ESRS E1-9 Location of significant assets at material physical risk paragraph 66 (c). |
|
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 paragraphs 46 and 47; Template 5: Banking book - Climate change physical risk: Exposures subject to physical risk. |
|
|
ESRS E1-9 Breakdown of the carrying value of its real estate assets by energy-efficiency classes paragraph 67 (c). |
|
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 paragraph 34;Template 2:Banking book -Climate change transition risk: Loans collateralised by immovable property - Energy efficiency of the collateral |
|
|
ESRS E1-9 Degree of exposure of the portfolio to climate- related opportunities paragraph 69 |
|
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II |
|
ESRS E2-4 Amount of each pollutant listed in Annex II of the E-PRTR Regulation (European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register) emitted to air, water and soil, paragraph 28 |
Indicator number 8 Table #1 of Annex 1 Indicator number 2 Table #2 of Annex 1 Indicator number 1 Table #2 of Annex 1 Indicator number 3 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E3-1 Water and marine resources paragraph 9 |
Indicator number 7 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E3-1 Dedicated policy paragraph 13 |
Indicator number 8 Table 2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E3-1 Sustainable oceans and seas paragraph 14 |
Indicator number 12 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E3-4 Total water recycled and reused paragraph 28 (c) |
Indicator number 6.2 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E3-4 Total water consumption in m3 per net revenue on own operations paragraph 29 |
Indicator number 6.1 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4 paragraph 16 (a) i |
Indicator number 7 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4 paragraph 16 (b) |
Indicator number 10 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4 paragraph 16 (c) |
Indicator number 14 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable land / agriculture practices or policies paragraph 24 (b) |
Indicator number 11 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable oceans / seas practices or policies paragraph 24 (c) |
Indicator number 12 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E4-2 Policies to address deforestation paragraph 24 (d) |
Indicator number 15 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E5-5 Non-recycled waste paragraph 37 (d) |
Indicator number 13 Table #2 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS E5-5 Hazardous waste and radioactive waste paragraph 39 |
Indicator number 9 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk of incidents of forced labour paragraph 14 (f) |
Indicator number 13 Table #3 of Annex I |
|
|
|
ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk of incidents of child labour paragraph 14 (g) |
Indicator number 12 Table #3 of Annex I |
|
|
|
ESRS S1-1 Human rights policy commitments paragraph 20 |
Indicator number 9 Table #3 and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex I |
|
|
|
ESRS S1-1 Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8, paragraph 21 |
|
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II |
|
ESRS S1-1 processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings paragraph 22 |
Indicator number 11 Table #3 of Annex I |
|
|
|
ESRS S1-1 workplace accident prevention policy or management system paragraph 23 |
Indicator number 1 Table #3 of Annex I |
|
|
|
ESRS S1-3 grievance/complaints handling mechanisms paragraph 32 (c) |
Indicator number 5 Table #3 of Annex I |
|
|
|
ESRS S1-14 Number of fatalities and number and rate of work-related accidents paragraph 88 (b) and (c) |
Indicator number 2 Table #3 of Annex I |
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II |
|
ESRS S1-14 Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities or illness paragraph 88 (e) |
Indicator number 3 Table #3 of Annex I |
|
|
|
ESRS S1-16 Unadjusted gender pay gap paragraph 97 (a) |
Indicator number 12 Table #1 of Annex I |
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II |
|
ESRS S1-16 Excessive CEO pay ratio paragraph 97 (b) |
Indicator number 8 Table #3 of Annex I |
|
|
|
ESRS S1-17 Incidents of discrimination paragraph 103 (a) |
Indicator number 7 Table #3 of Annex I |
|
|
|
ESRS S1-17 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD paragraph 104 (a) |
Indicator number 10 Table #1 and Indicator n. 14 Table #3 of Annex I |
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 Art 12 (1) |
|
ESRS 2- SBM3 – S2 Significant risk of child labour or forced labour in the value chain paragraph 11 (b) |
Indicators number 12 and n. 13 Table #3 of Annex I |
|
|
|
ESRS S2-1 Human rights policy commitments paragraph 17 |
Indicator number 9 Table #3 and Indicator n. 11 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS S2-1 Policies related to value chain workers paragraph 18 |
Indicator number 11 and n. 4 Table #3 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS S2-1Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines paragraph 19 |
Indicator number 10 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1) |
|
ESRS S2-1 Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8, paragraph 19 |
|
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II |
|
ESRS S2-4 Human rights issues and incidents connected to its upstream and downstream value chain paragraph 36 |
Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS S3-1 Human rights policy commitments paragraph 16 |
Indicator number 9 Table #3 of Annex 1 and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS S3-1 non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights, ILO principles or and OECD guidelines paragraph 17 |
Indicator number 10 Table #1 Annex 1 |
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1) |
|
ESRS S3-4 Human rights issues and incidents paragraph 36 |
Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS S4-1 Policies related to consumers and end-users paragraph 16 |
Indicator number 9 Table #3 and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS S4-1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD guidelines paragraph 17 |
Indicator number 10 Table #1 of Annex 1 |
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1) |
|
ESRS S4-4 Human rights issues and incidents paragraph 35 |
Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS G1-1 United Nations Convention against Corruption paragraph 10 (b) |
Indicator number 15 Table #3 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS G1-1 Protection of whistle- blowers paragraph 10 (d) |
Indicator number 6 Table #3 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
ESRS G1-4 Fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws paragraph 24 (a) |
Indicator number 17 Table #3 of Annex 1 |
|
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II) |
|
ESRS G1-4 Standards of anti- corruption and anti- bribery paragraph 24 (b) |
Indicator number 16 Table #3 of Annex 1 |
|
|
|
Appendix C
Disclosure and Application Requirements in Topical ESRS that are applicable in conjunction with ESRS 2 General disclosures
This appendix is an integral part of ESRS 2 and has the same authority as the other parts of the standard. The following table outlines the requirements in topical ESRS that need to be taken into account when reporting against the Disclosure Requirements in ESRS 2.
ESRS 2 Disclosure Requirement |
Related ESRS paragraph |
GOV–1 The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies |
ESRS G1 Business conduct (paragraph 5) |
GOV–3 Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes |
ESRS E1 Climate change (paragraph 13) |
SBM–2 Interests and views of stakeholders |
ESRS S1 Own workforce (paragraph 12) ESRS S2 Workers in the value chain (paragraph 9) ESRS S3 Affected communities (paragraph 7) ESRS S4 Consumers and end-users (paragraph 8) |
SBM–3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
ESRS E1 Climate Change (paragraphs 18 to 19) ESRS E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems (paragraph 16) ESRS S1 Own workforce (paragraph 13 to 16) ESRS S2 Workers in the value chain (paragraph 10 to 13) ESRS S3 Affected communities (paragraph 8 to 11) ESRS S4 Consumers and end-users (paragraph 9 to 12) |
IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities |
ESRS E1 Climate change (paragraph 20 to 21) ESRS E2 Pollution (paragraph 11) ESRS E3 Water and marine resources (paragraph 8) ESRS E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems (paragraph 17 to 19) ESRS E5 Resource use and circular economy (paragraph 11) ESRS G1 Business conduct (paragraph 6) |
ESRS E1
CLIMATE CHANGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
Interactions with other ESRS
Disclosure Requirements
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Governance
— |
Disclosure requirement related to ESRS 2 GOV-3 Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes |
Strategy
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-1 – Transition plan for climate change mitigation |
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-2 – Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-3 – Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-4 – Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-5 – Energy consumption and mix |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-6 – Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-7 – GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-8 – Internal carbon pricing |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-9 – Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Strategy
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-1 – Transition plan for climate change mitigation |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-2 – Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation |
— |
Disclosure Requirements E1-3 – Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-4 – Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-5 – Energy consumption and mix |
— |
Disclosure Requirements E1-6 – Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-7 – GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-8 – Internal carbon pricing |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E1-9 – Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities |
Objective
1. |
The objective of this Standard is to specify Disclosure Requirements which will enable users of
sustainability statements
to understand:
|
2. |
The Disclosure Requirements of this Standard take into account the requirements of related EU legislation and regulation (i.e., EU Climate Law (30), Climate Benchmark Standards Regulation (31), Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) (32), EU Taxonomy (33), and EBA Pillar 3 disclosure requirements (34)). |
3. |
This Standard covers Disclosure Requirements related to the following sustainability matters: “ Climate change mitigation ” and “ Climate change adaptation ”. It also covers energy-related matters, to the extent that they are relevant to climate change. |
4. |
Climate change mitigation relates to the undertaking’s endeavours to the general process of limiting the increase in the global average temperature to 1,5 °C above pre-industrial levels in line with the Paris Agreement. This Standard covers disclosure requirements related but not limited to the seven Greenhouse gases (GHG) carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3). It also covers Disclosure Requirements on how the undertaking addresses its GHG emissions as well as the associated transition risks . |
5. |
Climate change adaptation relates to the undertaking’s process of adjustment to actual and expected climate change. |
6. |
This Standard covers Disclosure Requirements regarding climate-related hazards that can lead to physical climate risks for the undertaking and its adaptation solutions to reduce these risks. It also covers transition risks arising from the needed adaptation to climate- related hazards. |
7. |
The Disclosure Requirements related to “Energy” cover all types of energy production and consumption. |
Interactions with other ESRS
8. |
Ozone-depleting substances (ODS), nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulphur oxides (SOX), among other air emissions, are connected to climate change but are covered under the reporting requirements in ESRS E2. |
9. |
Impacts on people that may arise from the transition to a climate-neutral economy are covered under the ESRS S1 Own workforce, ESRS S2 Workers in the value chain, ESRS S3 Affected communities and ESRS S4 Consumers and end-users. |
10. |
Climate change mitigation and adaptation are closely related to topics addressed in particular in ESRS E3 Water and marine resources and ESRS E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems. With regard to water and as illustrated in the table of climate-related hazards in AR 11, this standard addresses acute and chronic physical risks which arise from the water and ocean-related hazards. Biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation that may be caused by climate change are addressed in ESRS E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems. |
11. |
This Standard should be read and applied in conjunction with ESRS 1 General requirements and ESRS 2 General disclosures. |
Disclosure Requirements
ESRS 2 General disclosures
12. |
The requirements of this section should be read and applied in conjunction with the disclosures required by ESRS 2 on Chapter 2 Governance, Chapter 3 Strategy and Chapter 4 Impact, risk and opportunity management. The resulting disclosures shall be presented in the sustainability statement alongside the disclosures required by ESRS 2, except for ESRS 2 SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model, for which the undertaking may, in accordance with ESRS2 paragraph 46, present the disclosures alongside the other disclosures required in this topical standard. |
Governance
Disclosure requirement related to ESRS 2 GOV-3 Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes
13. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how climate-related considerations are factored into the remuneration of members of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies , including if their performance has been assessed against the GHG emission reduction targets reported under Disclosure Requirement E1-4 and the percentage of the remuneration recognised in the current period that is linked to climate related considerations, with an explanation of what the climate considerations are. |
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement E1-1 – Transition plan for climate change mitigation
14. |
The undertaking shall disclose its transition plan for climate change mitigation (35) . |
15. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the undertaking’s past, current, and future mitigation efforts to ensure that its strategy and business model are compatible with the transition to a sustainable economy, and with the limiting of global warming to 1.5 °C in line with the Paris Agreement and with the objective of achieving climate neutrality by 2050 and, where relevant, the undertaking’s exposure to coal, oil and gas-related activities. |
16. |
The information required by paragraph 14 shall include:
|
17. |
In case the undertaking does not have a transition plan in place, it shall indicate whether and, if so, when it will adopt a transition plan. |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
18. |
The undertaking shall explain for each material climate-related risk it has identified, whether the entity considers the risk to be a climate-related physical risk or climate-related transition risk. |
19. |
The undertaking shall describe the resilience of its strategy and
business model
in relation to climate change. This description shall include:
|
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities
20. |
The undertaking shall describe the process to identify and assess climate-related
impacts, risks
and
opportunities
. This description shall include its process in relation to:
|
21. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 20 (b)and 20 (c) the undertaking shall explain how it has used climate-related scenario analysis, including a range of climate scenarios, to inform the identification and assessment of physical risks and transition risks and opportunities over the short-, medium- and long-term. |
Disclosure Requirement E1-2 – Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
22. |
The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to climate change mitigation and adaptation. |
23. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of its material climate change mitigation and adaptation impacts, risks and opportunities. |
24. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 22 shall contain the information on the policies the undertaking has in place to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to climate change mitigation and adaptation in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. |
25. |
The undertaking shall indicate whether and how its
policies
address the following areas:
|
Disclosure Requirement E1-3 – Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies
26. |
The undertaking shall disclose its climate change mitigation and adaptation actions and the resources allocated for their implementation. |
27. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the key actions taken and planned to achieve climate-related policy objectives and targets. |
28. |
The description of the actions and resources related to climate change mitigation and adaptation shall follow the principles stated in ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters. |
29. |
In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-A, the undertaking shall:
|
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement E1-4 – Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
30. |
The undertaking shall disclose the climate-related targets it has set. |
31. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the targets the undertaking has set to support its climate change mitigation and adaptation policies and address its material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities. |
32. |
The disclosure of the targets required in paragraph 30 shall contain the information required in ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets. |
33. |
For the disclosure required by paragraph 30, the undertaking shall disclose whether and how it has set GHG emissions reduction targets and/or any other targets to manage material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities , for example, renewable energy deployment, energy efficiency, climate change adaptation , and physical or transition risk mitigation. |
34. |
If the undertaking has set
GHG
emission reduction targets
(39), ESRS 2 MDR-T and the following requirements shall apply:
|
Disclosure Requirement E1-5 – Energy consumption and mix
35. |
The undertaking shall provide information on its energy consumption and mix. |
36. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the undertaking’s total energy consumption in absolute value, improvement in energy efficiency, exposure to coal, oil and gas-related activities, and the share of renewable energy in its overall energy mix. |
37. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 35 shall include the total energy consumption in MWh related to own operations disaggregated by:
|
38. |
The undertaking with operations in
high climate impact sectors
(42) shall further disaggregate their total energy consumption from fossil sources by:
|
39. |
In addition, where applicable, the undertaking shall disaggregate and disclose separately its non-renewable energy production and renewable energy production in MWh. (43) |
Energy intensity based on net revenue (44)
40. |
The undertaking shall provide information on the energy intensity (total energy consumption per net revenue) associated with activities in high climate impact sectors . |
41. |
The disclosure on energy intensity required by paragraph 40 shall only be derived from the total energy consumption and net revenue from activities in high climate impact sectors . |
42. |
The undertaking shall specify the high climate impact sectors that are used to determine the energy intensity required by paragraph 40. |
43. |
The undertaking shall disclose the reconciliation to the relevant line item or notes in the financial statements of the net revenue amount from activities in high climate impact sectors (the denominator in the calculation of the energy intensity required by paragraph 40). |
Disclosure Requirement E1-6 – Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions
44. |
The undertaking shall disclose in metric tonnes of CO2eq its (45)
:
|
45. |
The objective of the Disclosure Requirement in paragraph 44 in respect of:
The information from this Disclosure Requirement is also needed to understand the undertaking’s climate-related transition risks. |
46. |
When disclosing the information on GHG emissions required under paragraph 44, the undertaking shall refer to ESRS 1 paragraphs from 62 to 67. In principle, the data on GHG emissions of its associates or joint ventures that are part of the undertaking’s upstream and downstream value chain (ESRS 1 Paragraph 67) are not limited to the share of equity held. For its associates, joint ventures, unconsolidated subsidiaries (investment entities) and contractual arrangements that are joint arrangements not structured through an entity (i.e., jointly controlled operations and assets), the undertaking shall include the GHG emissions in accordance with the extent of the undertaking’s operational control over them. |
47. |
In case of significant changes in the definition of what constitutes the reporting undertaking and its upstream and downstream value chain , the undertaking shall disclose these changes and explain their effect on the year-to-year comparability of its reported GHG emissions (i.e., the effect on the comparability of current versus previous reporting period GHG emissions). |
48. |
The disclosure on gross
Scope 1 GHG
emissions
required by paragraph 44 (a) shall include:
|
49. |
The disclosure on gross
Scope 2 GHG
emissions
required by paragraph 44 (b) shall include:
|
50. |
For
Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions
disclosed as required by paragraphs 44 (a) and (b) the undertaking shall disaggregate the information, separately disclosing emissions from:
|
51. |
The disclosure of gross Scope 3 GHG emissions required by paragraph 44 (c) shall include GHG emissions in metric tonnes of CO2eq from each significant Scope 3 category (i.e. each Scope 3 category that is a priority for the undertaking) . |
52. |
The disclosure of total
GHG emissions
required by paragraph 44 (d) shall be the sum of
Scope 1, 2
and
3 GHG emissions
required by paragraphs 44 (a) to (c). The total GHG emissions shall be disclosed with a disaggregation that makes a distinction of:
|
GHG Intensity based on net revenue (46)
53. |
The undertaking shall disclose its GHG emissions intensity (total GHG emissions per net revenue). |
54. |
The disclosure on GHG intensity required by paragraph 53 shall provide the total GHG emissions in metric tonnes of CO2eq (required by paragraph 44 (d)) per net revenue. |
55. |
The undertaking shall disclose the reconciliation to the relevant line item or notes in the financial statements of the net revenue amounts (the denominator in the calculation of the GHG emissions intensity required by paragraph 53). |
Disclosure Requirement E1-7 – GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits
56. |
The undertaking shall disclose:
|
57. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is:
|
58. |
The disclosure on
GHG removals and storage
required by paragraph 56 (a) shall include, if applicable:
|
59. |
The disclosure on
carbon credits
required by paragraph 56 (b) shall include, if applicable:
|
60. |
In the case where the undertaking discloses a net-zero target in addition to the gross GHG emission reduction targets in accordance with Disclosure Requirement E1-4, paragraph 30, it shall explain the scope, methodologies and frameworks applied and how the residual GHG emissions (after approximately 90-95% of GHG emission reduction with the possibility for justified sectoral variations in line with a recognised sectoral decarbonisation pathway) are intended to be neutralised by, for example, GHG removals in its own operations and upstream and donwstream value chain. |
61. |
In the case where the undertaking may have made public claims of GHG neutrality that involve the use of
carbon credits
, it shall explain:
|
Disclosure Requirement E1-8 – Internal carbon pricing
62. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether it applies internal carbon pricing schemes, and if so, how they support its decision making and incentivise the implementation of climate-related policies and targets. |
63. |
The information required in paragraph 62 shall include:
|
Disclosure Requirement E1-9 – Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities
64. |
The undertaking shall disclose its:
|
65. |
The information required by paragraph 64 is in addition to the information on current
financial effects
required under ESRS 2 SBM-3 para 48 (d). The objective of this Disclosure Requirement related to:
|
66. |
The disclosure of
anticipated financial effects
from material
physical risks
required by paragraph 64 (a) shall include (48):
|
67. |
The disclosure of
anticipated financial effects
from material transition risks required by paragraph 64 (b) shall include:
|
68. |
The undertaking shall disclose reconciliations to the relevant line items or notes in the financial statements of the following:
|
69. |
For the disclosure of the potential to pursue climate-related
opportunities
required by paragraph 64 (c) the undertaking shall consider (52):
|
70. |
A quantification of the financial effects that arise from opportunities is not required if such a disclosure does not meet the qualitative characteristics of useful information included under ESRS 1 Appendix B Qualitative characteristics of information. |
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This Appendix is an integral part of the ESRS E1. It supports the application of the disclosure requirements set out in this standard and has the same authority as the other parts of the Standard.
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement E1-1 – Transition plan for climate change mitigation
AR 1. |
A transition plan relates to the undertaking’s efforts in climate change mitigation . When disclosing its transition plan, the undertaking is expected to provide a high-level explanation of how it will adjust its strategy and business model to ensure compatibility with the transition to a sustainable economy and with the limiting of global warming to 1.5°C in line with the Paris Agreement (or an updated inter national agreement on climate change) and the objective of achieving climate neutrality by 2050 with no or limited overshoot as established in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 (European Climate Law), and where applicable, how it will adjust its exposure to coal, and oil and gas-related activities. |
AR 2. |
Sectoral pathways have not yet been defined by the public policies for all sectors. Hence, the disclosure under paragraph 16 (a) on the compatibility of the transition plan with the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C should be understood as the disclosure of the undertaking’s GHG emissions reduction target . The disclosure under paragraph 16 (a) shall be benchmarked in relation to a pathway to 1.5°C. This benchmark should be based on either a sectoral decarbonisation pathway if available for the undertaking’s sector or an economy-wide scenario bearing in mind its limitations (i.e., it is a simple translation of emission reduction objectives from the state to undertaking level). This AR should be read also in conjunction with AR 26 and AR 27 and the sectoral decarbonisation pathways they refer to. |
AR 3. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraph 16(d) the undertaking may consider:
|
AR 4. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraph 16 (e), the undertaking shall explain how the alignment of its economic activities with the provisions of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 is expected to evolve over time to support its transition to a sustainable economy. In doing so, the undertaking shall take account of the key performance indicators required to be disclosed under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (in particular taxonomy-aligned revenue and CapEx and, if applicable, CapEx plans). |
AR 5. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraph 16 (f), the undertaking shall state whether or not it is excluded from the EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks in accordance with the exclusion criteria stated in Articles 12.1 (d) to (g) (53) and 12.2 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Standards Regulation) (54). |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
AR 6. |
When disclosing the information on the scope of the resilience analysis as required under paragraph 19 (a), the undertaking shall explain which part of its own operations and upstream and downstream value chain as well as which material physical risks and transition risks may have been excluded from the analysis. |
AR 7. |
When disclosing the information on how the resilience analysis has been conducted as required under paragraph 19 (b), the undertaking shall explain:
|
AR 8. |
When disclosing the information on the results of the resilience analysis as required under paragraph 19 (c), the undertaking shall explain:
|
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities
AR 9. |
When disclosing the information on the processes to identify and assess climate impacts as required under paragraph 20 (a), the undertaking shall explain how it has:
|
AR 10. |
The undertaking may link the information disclosed under paragraphs 20 (a) and AR 9 to the information disclosed under the following Disclosure Requirements: Disclosure Requirement E1-1, paragraph 16 (d) on locked-in GHG emissions; Disclosure Requirement E1-4 and Disclosure Requirement E1-6. |
AR 11. |
When disclosing the information on the processes to identify and assess
physical risks
as required under paragraph 20 (b), the undertaking shall explain whether and how:
|
AR 12. |
When disclosing the information on the processes to identify
transition risks
and
opportunities
as required under paragraph 20 (c), the undertaking shall explain whether and how it has:
|
Climate-related scenario analysis
AR 13. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 19, 20, 21, AR 10 and AR 11, the undertaking shall explain how it has used climate-related
scenario analysis
that is commensurate to its circumstances to inform the identification and assessment of
physical
and
transition risks
and
opportunities
over the short-, medium- and long-term, including:
|
AR 14. |
When conducting scenario analysis , the undertaking may consider the following guidance: TCFD Technical Supplement on “The Use of Scenario Analysis in Disclosure of Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities” (2017); TCFD “Guidance on Scenario Analysis for Non-Financial Companies” (2020); ISO 14091:2021 “Adaptation to climate change — Guidelines on vulnerability, impacts and risk assessment”; any other recognised industry standards such as NGFS (Network for Greening the Financial System); and EU, national, regional and local regulations. |
AR 15. |
The undertaking shall briefly explain how the climate scenarios used are compatible with the critical climate-related assumptions made in the financial statements. |
Disclosure Requirement E1-2 – Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
AR 16. |
Policies related to either climate change mitigation or climate adaptation may be disclosed separately as their objectives, people involved, actions and resources needed to implement them are different. |
AR 17. |
Policies related to climate change mitigation address the management of the undertaking’s GHG emissions , GHG removals and transition risks over different time horizons, in its own operations and/or in the upstream and downstream value chain . The requirement under paragraph 14 may relate to stand-alone climate change mitigation policies as well as relevant policies on other matters that indirectly support climate change mitigation including training policies, procurement or supply chain policies, investment policies or product development policies. |
AR 18. |
Policies related to climate change adaptation address the management of the undertaking’s physical climate risks and of its transition risks related to climate change adaptation. The requirement under paragraphs 22 and 25 may relate to stand-alone climate change adaptation policies as well as relevant policies on other matters that indirectly support climate change adaptation including training policies, and emergency or health and safety policies. |
Disclosure Requirements E1-3 – Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies
AR 19. |
When disclosing the information on
actions
as required under paragraphs 29 (a) and 29 (b), the undertaking may:
|
AR 20. |
When disclosing the information on resources as required under paragraph 29 (c), the undertaking shall only disclose the significant OpEx and CapEx amounts required for the implementation of the actions as the purpose of this information is to demonstrate the credibility of its actions rather than to reconcile the disclosed amounts to the financial statements. The disclosed CapEx and OpEx amounts shall be the additions made to both tangible and intangible assets during the current financial year as well as the planned additions for future periods of implementing the actions. The disclosed amounts shall only be the incremental financial investments directly contributing to the achievement of the undertaking’s targets. |
AR 21. |
In line with the requirements of ESRS 2 MDR-A, the undertaking shall explain if and to what extent its ability to implement the actions depends on the availability and allocation of resources. Ongoing access to finance at an affordable cost of capital can be critical for the implementation of the undertaking’s actions, which include its adjustments to supply/demand changes or its related acquisitions and significant research and development (R&D) investments. |
AR 22. |
The amounts of OpEx and CapEx required for the implementation of the actions disclosed under paragraph 29 (c) shall be consistent with the key performance indicators (CapEx and OpEx key performance indicators) and, if applicable, the CapEx plan required by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178. The undertaking shall explain any potential differences between the significant OpEx and CapEx amounts disclosed under this Standard and the key performance indicators disclosed under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 due to, for instance, the disclosure of non-eligible economic activities as defined in that delegated regulation. The undertaking may structure its actions by economic activity to compare its OpEx and CapEx, and if applicable its OpEx and/or CapEx plans to its Taxonomy-aligned key performance indicators. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement E1-4 – Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
AR 23. |
Under paragraph 34 (a), the undertaking may disclose GHG emission reduction targets in intensity value. Intensity targets are formulated as ratios of GHG emissions relative to a unit of physical activity or economic output. Relevant units of activity or output are referred to in ESRS sector-specific standards. In cases where the undertaking has only set a GHG intensity reduction target, it shall nevertheless disclose the associated absolute values for the target year and interim target year(s). This may result in a situation where an undertaking is required to disclose an increase of absolute GHG emissions for the target year and interim target year(s), for example because it anticipates organic growth of its business. |
AR 24. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraph 34 (b), the undertaking shall specify the share of the target related to each respective GHG emission Scope (1, 2 or 3) . The undertaking shall state the method used to calculate Scope 2 GHG emissions included in the target (i.e., either the location-based or market-based method). If the boundary of the GHG emission reduction target diverges from that of the GHG emissions reported under Disclosure Requirement E1-6, the undertaking shall disclose which gases are covered, the respective percentage of Scope 1, 2, 3 and total GHG emissions covered by the target. For the GHG emission reduction targets of its subsidiaries, the undertaking shall analogously apply these requirements at the level of the subsidiary. |
AR 25. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraph 34(c) on base year and baseline value:
|
AR 26. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 34 (d) and 34 (e), the undertaking shall present the information over the target period with reference to a sector- specific, if available, or a cross-sector emission pathway compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C. For this purpose, the undertaking shall calculate a 1.5°C aligned reference target value for Scope 1 and 2 (and, if applicable, a separate one for Scope 3) against which its own GHG emission reduction targets or interim targets in the respective Scopes can be compared. |
AR 27. |
The reference target value may be calculated by multiplying the GHG emissions in the base year with either a sector-specific (sectoral decarbonisation methodology) or cross-sector (contraction methodology) emission reduction factor. These emission reduction factors can be derived from different sources. The undertaking should ensure that the source used is based on an emission reduction pathway compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C. |
AR 28. |
The
emission reduction
factors are subject to further development. Consequently, undertakings are encouraged to only use updated publicly available information.
|
AR 29. |
The reference target value is dependent on the base year and baseline emissions of the undertaking’s GHG emission reduction target. As a result, the reference target value for undertakings with a recent base year or from higher baseline emissions may be less challenging to achieve than it will be for undertakings that have already taken ambitious past actions to reduce GHG emissions. Therefore, undertakings that have in the past achieved GHG emissions reductions compatible with either a 1.5°C-aligned cross-sector or sector-specific pathway, may adjust their baseline emissions accordingly to determine the reference target value. Accordingly, if the undertaking is adjusting the baseline emissions to determine the reference target value, it shall not consider GHG emission reductions that precede the year 2020 and it shall provide appropriate evidence of its past achieved GHG emission reduction. |
AR 30. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraph 34 (f), the undertaking shall explain:
|
AR 31. |
The undertaking may present its GHG
emission reduction targets
together with its
climate change mitigation
actions
(see paragraph AR 19) as a table or graphical pathway showing developments over time. The following figure and table provide examples combining targets and decarbonisation levers:
|
Disclosure Requirement E1-5 – Energy consumption and mix
Calculation guidance
AR 32. |
When preparing the information on energy consumption required under paragraph 35, the undertaking shall:
|
AR 33. |
The information required under paragraph 37 (a) is applicable if the undertaking is operating in at least one high climate impact sector . The information required under paragraph 38 (a) to (e). shall also include energy from fossil sources consumed in operations that are not in high climate impact sectors. |
AR 34. |
The information on Energy consumption and mix may be presented using the following tabular format for
high climate impact sectors
and for all other sector by omitting rows (1) to (5).
|
AR 35. |
The total energy consumption with a distinction between fossil, nuclear and renewable energy consumption may be presented graphically in the sustainability statement showing developments over time (e.g., through a pie or bar chart). |
Energy intensity based on net revenue
AR 36. |
When preparing the information on energy intensity required under paragraph 40, the undertaking shall:
|
AR 37. |
The quantitative information may be presented in the following table.
|
AR 38. |
The reconciliation of net revenue from activities in
high climate impact sectors
to the relevant financial statements line item or disclosure (as required by paragraph 43) may be presented either:
|
Disclosure Requirements E1-6 – Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions
Calculation guidance
AR 39. |
When preparing the information for reporting GHG
emissions
as required by paragraph 44, the undertaking shall:
|
AR 40. |
When preparing the information for reporting GHG emissions from its associates, joint ventures, unconsolidated subsidiaries (investment entities) and contractual arrangements as required by paragraph 50, the undertaking shall consolidate 100% of the GHG emissions of the entities it operationally controls. In practice, this happens when the undertakings holds the license - or permit - to operate the assets from these associates, joint ventures, unconsolidated subsidiaries (investment entities) and contractual arrangements. When the undertaking has a contractually defined part-time operational control, it shall consolidate 100% the GHG emitted during the time of its operational control. |
AR 41. |
In line with ESRS 1 chapter 3.7, the undertaking shall disaggregate information on its GHG emissions as appropriate. For example, the undertaking may disaggregate its Scope 1, 2, 3, or total GHG emissions by country, operating segments, economic activity, subsidiary, GHG category (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, NF3, and other GHG considered by the undertaking) or source type (stationary combustion, mobile combustion, process emissions and fugitive emissions). |
AR 42. |
An undertaking might have a different reporting period from some or all of the entities in its value chain. In such circumstances, the undertaking is permitted to measure its GHG emissions in accordance with paragraph 44 using information for reporting periods that are different from its own reporting period if that information is obtained from entities in its value chain with reporting periods that are different from the undertaking’s reporting period, on the condition that:
|
AR 43. |
When preparing the information on gross
Scope 1 GHG
emissions
required under paragraph 48 (a), the undertaking shall:
|
AR 44. |
When preparing the information on the percentage of Scope 1 GHG
emissions
from regulated emission trading schemes required under paragraph 48 (b), the undertaking shall:
|
AR 45. |
When preparing the information on gross Scope 2 GHG
emissions
required under paragraph 49, the undertaking shall:
|
AR 46. |
When preparing the information on gross Scope 3 GHG
emissions
required under paragraph 51, the undertaking shall:
|
AR 47. |
When preparing the information on the total GHG
emissions
required under paragraph 52, the undertaking shall:
|
AR 48. |
The undertaking shall disclose its total GHG
emissions
disaggregated by Scopes 1 and 2 and significant Scope 3 in accordance with the table below.
|
AR 49. |
To highlight potential transition risks , the undertaking may disclose its total GHG emissions disaggregated by major countries and, if applicable, by operating segments (applying the same segments for the financial statements as required by the accounting standards, i.e., IFRS 8 Operating Segments or local GAAP). Scope 3 GHG emissions may be excluded from these breakdowns by country if the related data is not readily available. |
AR 50. |
The Scope 3 GHG emissions may also be presented by according to the indirect emission categories defined in EN ISO 14064-1:2018. |
AR 51. |
If it is material for the undertaking's Scope 3 emissions, it shall disclose the GHG emissions from purchased cloud computing and data centre services as a subset of the overarching Scope 3 category “upstream purchased goods and services”. |
AR 52. |
The total GHG emissions disaggregated by Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions may be graphically presented in the sustainability statement (e.g., as a bar or pie chart) showing the split of GHG emissions across the value chain (Upstream, Own operations, Transport, Downstream). |
GHG intensity based on net revenue
AR 53. |
When disclosing the information on GHG intensity based on net revenue required under paragraph 53, the undertaking shall:
|
AR 54. |
The quantitative information may be presented in the following tabular format.
|
AR 55. |
The reconciliation of the net revenue used to calculate GHG intensity to the relevant line item or notes in the financial statements (as required by paragraph 55) may be done by either:
|
Disclosure Requirement E1-7 – GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits
GHG removals and storage in own operations and the upstream and downstream value chain
AR 56. |
In addition to their GHG emission inventories, undertakings shall provide transparency on how and to what extent they either enhance natural sinks or apply technical solutions to remove GHGs from the atmosphere in their own operations and upstream and downstream value chain. While there are no generally accepted concepts and methodologies for accounting for GHG removals, this Standard aims to increase transparency on the undertaking’s efforts to remove GHGs from the atmosphere (paragraphs 56 (a) and 58). The GHG removals outside the value chain that the undertaking supports through the purchase of carbon credits are to be disclosed separately as required by paragraphs 56 (b) and 59. |
AR 57. |
When disclosing the information on
GHG removals and storage
from the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream and donwstream
value chain
required under paragraphs 56 (a) and 58, for each removal and storage activity, the undertaking shall describe:
|
AR 58. |
When preparing the information on
GHG removals and storage
from the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream and donwstream
value chain
required under paragraphs 56 (a) and 58, the undertaking shall:
|
AR 59. |
The undertaking shall disaggregate and separately disclose the GHG removals that occur in its own operations and those that occur in its upstream and downstream value chain. GHG removal activities in the upstream and downstream value chain shall include those that the undertaking is actively supporting, for example, through a cooperation project with a supplier . The undertaking is not expected to include any GHG removals that may occur in its upstream and downstream value chain that it is not aware of. |
AR 60. |
The quantitative information on GHG removals may be presented by using the following tabular format.
|
GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits
AR 61. |
Financing GHG emission reduction projects outside the undertaking’s value chain through purchasing carbon credits that fulfil high-quality standards can be a useful contribution towards mitigating climate change. This Standard requires the undertaking to disclose whether it uses carbon credits separately from the GHG emissions (paragraphs 56 (b) and 59) and GHG emission reduction targets (Disclosure Requirement E1-4). It also requires the undertaking to show the extent of use and which quality criteria it uses for those carbon credits. |
AR 62. |
When disclosing the information on
carbon credits
required under paragraphs 56 (b) and 59, the undertaking shall disclose the following disaggregation as applicable:
|
AR 63. |
When preparing the information on
carbon credits
required under paragraphs 56 (b) and 59, the undertaking shall:
|
AR 64. |
The information on
carbon credits
cancelled in the reporting year and planned to be cancelled in the future may be presented using the following tabular formats.
|
Disclosure Requirement E1-8 – Internal carbon pricing
AR 65. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 62 and 63, if applicable, the undertaking shall briefly explain whether and how the carbon prices used in internal carbon pricing schemes are consistent with those used in financial statements. This shall be done in respect of the internal carbon prices used for,
|
AR 66. |
The information may be presented by using the following table:
|
Disclosure Requirement E1-9 – Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities
Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks
AR 67. |
Material climate-related physical risks and transition risks may affect the undertaking’s financial position (e.g., owned assets, financially-controlled leased assets, and liabilities), performance (e.g., potential future increase/decrease in net revenue and costs due to business interruptions, increased supply prices resulting in potential margin erosions), and cash flows. The low probability, high severity and long-term time horizons of some climate- related physical risk exposures and the uncertainty arising from the transition to a sustainable economy mean that there will be associated material anticipated financial effects that are outside the scope of the requirements of applicable accounting standards. |
AR 68. |
Currently, there is no commonly accepted methodology to assess or measure how material physical risks and transition risks may affect the undertaking’s future financial position, financial, performance and cash flows. Therefore, the disclosure of the financial effects (as required by paragraphs 64, 66 and 67) will depend on the undertaking’s internal methodology and the exercise of significant judgement in determining the inputs, and assumptions needed to quantify their anticipated financial effects. |
AR 69. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 64 (a) and 66, the undertaking shall explain whether and how:
|
AR 70. |
When preparing the information on assets at material physical risk that is required to be disclosed under paragraph 66 (a), the undertaking shall:
|
AR 71. |
When preparing the information required under paragraph 64 (a) and 66 (d), the undertaking may assess and disclose the share of net revenue from business activities at physical risk. This disclosure
|
AR 72. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 64 (b) and 67 (a), the undertaking shall explain whether and how:
|
AR 73. |
When disclosing the information on assets at material transition risk as required under paragraphs 67 (a) and (b):
|
AR 74. |
When disclosing the information on potential liabilities from material
transition risks
required under paragraph 67(d):
|
AR 75. |
Other approaches and methodologies may be applied to assess how transition risks may affect the future financial position of the undertaking. In any case, the disclosure of anticipated financial effects shall include a description of the methodologies and definitions used by the undertaking. |
AR 76. |
When preparing the information required under paragraph 67 (e), the undertaking may assess and disclose the share of net revenue from business activities at
transition risks
. This disclosure:
|
AR 77. |
The reconciliation of the significant amount of assets, liabilities, and net revenue (vulnerable to either material
physical risks
or
transition risks
) to the relevant line item or disclosure (e.g., in segment reporting) in the financial statements (as required by paragraph 68) may be presented by the undertaking as follows:
|
AR 78. |
The undertaking shall ensure the consistency of data and assumptions to assess and report the anticipated financial effects from material physical risks and transition risks in the sustainability statement with the corresponding data and assumptions used for the financial statements (e.g., carbon prices used for assessing impairment of assets, the useful life of assets, estimates and provisions). The undertaking shall explain the reasons for any inconsistencies (e.g., if the full financial implications of climate-related risks are still under assessment or are not deemed material in the financial statements). |
AR 79. |
For potential future effects on liabilities (as required by paragraph 67 (d)), if applicable, the undertaking shall cross-reference the description of the emission trading schemes in the financial statements. |
Climate-related opportunities
AR 80. |
When disclosing the information under paragraph 69 (a), the undertaking shall explain the nature of the cost savings (e.g., from reduced energy consumption), the time horizons and the methodology used, including the scope of the assessment, critical assumptions, and limitations, and whether and how scenario analysis was applied. |
AR 81. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraph 69 (b), the undertaking shall explain how it has assessed the market size or any expected changes to net revenue from low-carbon products and services or adaptation solutions including the scope of the assessment, the time horizon, critical assumptions, and limitations and to what extent this market is accessible to the undertaking. The information on the market size may be put in perspective to the current taxonomy-aligned revenue disclosed under the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. The entity may also explain how it will pursue its climate-related opportunities and, where possible, this should be linked to the disclosures on policies, targets and actions under Disclosure Requirements E1-2, E1-3 and E1-4. |
ESRS E2
POLLUTION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
Interaction with other ESRS
Disclosure Requirements
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-1 – Policies related to pollution |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-2 – Actions and resources related to pollution |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-3 – Targets related to pollution |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-4 – Pollution of air, water and soil |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-5 – Substances of concern and substances of very high concern |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-6 – Anticipated financial effects from pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-1 – Policies related to pollution |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-2 – Actions and resources related to pollution |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-3 – Targets related to pollution |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-4 – Pollution of air, water and soil |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-5 – Substances of concern and substances of very high concern |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E2-6 – Anticipated financial effects from pollution-related, risks and opportunities |
Objective
1. |
The objective of this Standard is to specify Disclosure Requirements which will enable users of the
sustainability statement
to understand:
|
2. |
This Standard sets out Disclosure Requirements related to the following sustainability matters : pollution of air, water, soil , substances of concern , including substances of very high concern . |
3. |
“ Pollution of air” refers to the undertaking’s emissions into air (both indoor and outdoor), and prevention, control and reduction of such emissions. |
4. |
“ Pollution of water” refers to the undertaking’s emissions to water, and prevention, control and reduction of such emissions. |
5. |
“ Pollution of soil ” refers to the undertaking’s emissions into soil and the prevention, control and reduction of such emissions. |
6. |
With regard to “ substances of concern ”, this standard covers the undertaking’s production, use and/or distribution and commercialisation of substances of concern, including substances of very high concern . Disclosure Requirements on substances of concern aim at providing users with an understanding of actual or potential impacts related to such substances, also taking account of possible restrictions on their use and/or distribution and commercialisation. |
Interaction with other ESRS
7. |
The topic of
pollution
is closely connected to other environmental sub-topics such as climate change, water and
marine resources
,
biodiversity
and
circular economy
. Thus, to provide a comprehensive overview of what could be material to pollution, relevant Disclosure Requirements are covered in other environmental Standards as follows:
|
8. |
The undertaking’s pollution -related impacts may affect people and communities. Material negative impacts on affected communities from pollution-related impacts attributable to the undertaking are covered in ESRS S3 Affected communities. |
9. |
This Standard should be read in conjunction with ESRS 1 General requirements and ESRS 2 General disclosures. |
Disclosure Requirements
ESRS 2 General disclosures
10. |
The requirements of this section should be read in conjunction with and reported alongside the disclosures required by ESRS 2 chapter 4 Impact, risk and opportunity management. |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities
11. |
The undertaking shall describe the process to identify material
impacts, risks
and
opportunities
and shall provide information on:
|
Disclosure Requirement E2-1 – Policies related to pollution
12. |
The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to pollution prevention and control. |
13. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of material pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities. |
14. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 12 shall contain the information on the policies the undertaking has in place to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to pollution in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. |
15. |
The undertaking shall indicate, with regard to its own operations and its upstream and donwstream
value chain
, whether and how its
policies
address the following areas where material:
|
Disclosure Requirement E2-2 – Actions and resources related to pollution
16. |
The undertaking shall disclose its pollution-related actions and the resources allocated to their implementation. |
17. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the key actions taken and planned to achieve the pollution -related policy objectives and targets. |
18. |
The description of the pollution-related action plans and resources shall contain the information prescribed in ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters. |
19. |
In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-A, the undertaking may specify to which layer in the following mitigation hierarchy an action and resources can be allocated:
|
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement E2-3 – Targets related to pollution
20. |
The undertaking shall disclose the pollution-related targets it has set. |
21. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the targets the undertaking has set to support its pollution -related policies and to address its material pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities . |
22. |
The description of targets shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets. |
23. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 20 shall indicate whether and how its
targets
relate to the prevention and control of:
|
24. |
In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-T, the undertaking may specify whether
ecological thresholds
(e.g., the
biosphere integrity
, stratospheric ozone-depletion, atmospheric aerosol loading, soil depletion, ocean acidification) and entity-specific allocations were taken into consideration when setting targets. If so, the undertaking may specify:
|
25. |
The undertaking shall specify as part of the contextual information, whether the targets that it has set and presented are mandatory (required by legislation) or voluntary. |
Disclosure Requirement E2-4 – Pollution of air, water and soil
26. |
The undertaking shall disclose the pollutants that it emits through its own operations, as well as the microplastics it generates or uses. |
27. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the emissions that the undertaking generates to air, water and soil in its own operations, and of its generation and use of microplastics. |
28. |
The undertaking shall disclose the amounts of:
|
29. |
The amounts referred in paragraph 28 shall be consolidated amounts including the emissions from those facilities over which the undertaking has financial control and those over which it has operational control. The consolidation shall include only the emissions from facilities for which the applicable threshold value specified in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 is exceeded. |
30. |
The undertaking shall put its disclosure into context and describe:
|
31. |
When an inferior methodology compared to direct measurement of emissions is chosen to quantify emissions, the reasons for choosing this inferior methodology shall be outlined by the undertaking. If the undertaking uses estimates, it shall disclose the standard, sectoral study or sources which form the basis of its estimates, as well as the possible degree of uncertainty and the range of estimates reflecting the measurement uncertainty. |
Disclosure Requirement E2-5 – Substances of concern and substances of very high concern
32. |
The undertaking shall disclose information on the production, use, distribution, commercialisation and import/export of substances of concern and substances of very high concern, on their own, in mixtures or in articles. |
33. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the impact of the undertaking on health and the environment through substances of concern and through substances of very high concern on their own. It is also to enable an understanding of the undertaking’s material risks and opportunities , including exposure to those substances and risks arising from changes in regulations. |
34. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 32 shall include the total amounts of substances of concern that are generated or used during the production or that are procured, and the total amounts of substances of concern that leave its facilities as emissions, as products, or as part of products or services split into main hazard classes of substances of concern. |
35. |
The undertaking shall present separately the information for substances of very high concern. |
Disclosure Requirement E2-6 – Anticipated financial effects from material pollution-related risks and opportunities
36. |
The undertaking shall disclose the anticipated financial effects of material pollution-related risks and opportunities. |
37. |
The information required by paragraph 36 is in addition to the information on current financial effects on the undertaking’s, financial position, financial performance and cash flows for the reporting period required under ESRS 2 SBM-3 para 48 (d). |
38. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
|
39. |
The disclosure shall include:
|
40. |
The information provided under paragraph 38(a) shall include:
|
41. |
The undertaking shall disclose any relevant contextual information including a description of material incidents and deposits whereby pollution had negative impacts on the environment and/or is expected to have negative effects on the undertaking’s financial cash flows, financial position and financial performance with short-, medium- and long-term time horizons. |
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This Appendix is an integral part of ESRS E2. It supports the application of the disclosure requirements set out in this standard and has the same authority as the other parts of the Standard.
ESRS 2 GENERAL DISCLOSURES
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities
AR 1. |
When conducting a
materiality
assessment on environmental subtopics, the undertaking shall assess the materiality of pollution in its own operations and its upstream and downstream
value chain
, and may consider the four phases below, also known as the LEAP approach:
|
AR 2. |
The materiality assessment for ESRS E2 corresponds to the first three phases of this LEAP approach. The fourth phase addresses the outcome of the process. |
AR 3. |
The process to assess the materiality of impacts , dependencies , risks and opportunities shall consider the provisions in ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities, and IRO-2 Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement. |
AR 4. |
The sub-topics covered by the
materiality
assessment under ESRS E2 include:
|
AR 5. |
In Phase 1, to locate where in its own operations and its upstream and downstream
value chain
the interface with nature takes place, the undertaking may consider:
|
AR 6. |
Phase 2 relates to the evaluation of the undertaking’s impacts and dependencies for each material site or sector/business unit including by assessing the severity and likelihood of impacts on the environment and human health. |
AR 7. |
In Phase 3, to assess its material
risks
and
opportunities
based on the results of Phases 1 and 2, the undertaking may :
|
AR 8. |
In order to assess materiality , the undertaking may consider Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations. |
AR 9. |
When providing information on the outcome of its
materiality
assessment, the undertaking shall consider:
|
Disclosure Requirement E2-1 – Policies related to pollution
AR 10. |
The policies described under this Disclosure Requirement may be integrated in broader environmental or sustainability policies covering different subtopics. |
AR 11. |
The description of the policies shall include information on the pollutant(s) or substance(s) covered. |
AR 12. |
When disclosing information under paragraph 11, the undertaking may include contextual information on the relations between its policies implemented and how they may contribute to the EU Action Plan “Towards a Zero Pollution for Air, Water and Soil” with for instance elements on:
|
Disclosure Requirement E2-2 – Actions and resources related to pollution
AR 13. |
Where actions extend to upstream or downstream value chain engagements, the undertaking shall provide information on the types of actions reflecting these engagements. |
AR 14. |
When considering resources, examples of operational expenditures could be investments in research and development to innovate and develop safe and sustainable alternatives to the use of substances of concern or to decrease emissions in a production process. |
AR 15. |
Where relevant to achieve its pollution -related policy objectives and targets , the undertaking may provide information on site -level action plans. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement E2-3 – Targets related to pollution
AR 16. |
If the undertaking refers to ecological thresholds when setting targets , it may refer to the guidance provided by the Science-Based Targets Initiative for Nature (SBTN) in its interim guidance (Initial Guidance for Business, September 2020), or any other guidance with a scientifically acknowledged methodology that allows setting of science-based targets by identifying ecological thresholds and, if applicable, entity-specific allocations. Ecological thresholds can be local, national and/or global. |
AR 17. |
The undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related to the Substantial Contribution criteria for Pollution Prevention and Control as defined in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 14(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. Where the Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) criteria for Pollution Prevention and Control as defined in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 10(3), Article 11(3), Article 12(2), Article 13(2), and Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 are not met, the undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related those DNSH critera. |
AR 18. |
Where relevant to support the policies it has adopted, the undertaking may provide information on the targets set at site level. |
AR 19. |
The targets may cover the undertaking’s own operations and/or the value chain. |
Disclosure Requirement E2-4 – Pollution of air, water and soil
AR 20. |
The information to be provided on microplastics under paragraph 28(b) shall include microplastics that have been generated or used during production processes or that are procured, and that leave the undertaking’s facilities as emissions, as products, or as part of products or services. Microplastics may be unintentionally produced when larger pieces of plastics like car tires or synthetic textiles wear and tear or may be deliberately manufactured and added to products for specific purposes (e.g., exfoliating beads in facial or body scrubs). |
AR 21. |
The volume of pollutants shall be presented in appropriate mass units, for example tonnes or kilogrammes. |
AR 22. |
The information required under this Disclosure Requirement shall be provided at the level of the reporting undertaking. However, the undertaking may disclose additional breakdown including information at site level or a breakdown of its emissions by type of source, by sector or by geographical area. |
AR 23. |
When providing contextual information on the emissions, the undertaking may consider:
|
AR 24. |
The information provided under this Disclosure Requirement may refer to information the undertaking is already required to report under other existing legislation (i.e., IED, E- PRTR, etc.). |
AR 25. |
Where the undertaking’s activities are subject to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (IED) (67) and relevant Best Available Techniques Reference Documents (
BREFs), irrespective of whether the activity takes place within the European Union or not, the undertaking may disclose the following additional information:
|
Methodologies
AR 26. |
When providing information on
pollutants
, the undertaking shall consider approaches for quantification in the following order of priority:
|
AR 27. |
Regarding the disclosure of methodologies required by paragraph 30, the undertaking shall consider:
|
Disclosure Requirement E2-5 – Substances of concern and substances of very high concern
List of substances to be considered
AR 28. |
In order for the information to be complete, substances in the undertaking’s own operations and those procured shall be included (e.g., embedded in ingredients, semi- finished products, or the final product). |
AR 29. |
The volume of pollutants shall be presented in mass units, for example tonnes or kilogrammes or other mass units appropriate for the volumes and type of pollutants being released. |
Contextual information
AR 30. |
The information provided under this Disclosure Requirement may refer to information the undertaking is already required to report under other existing legislation (i.e., Directive 2010/75/EU, Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 “E-PRTR”, etc.). |
Disclosure Requirement E2-6 – Anticipated financial effects from material pollution-related risks and opportunities
AR 31. |
The operating and capital expenditures related to
incidents
and
deposits
may include for instance:
|
AR 32. |
Incidents may include for instance interruptions of production, whether arising from the supply chain and/or from own operations, which resulted in pollution . |
AR 33. |
The undertaking may include an assessment of its related products and services at risk over the short-, medium- and long-term, explaining how these are defined, how financial amounts are estimated, and which critical assumptions are made. |
AR 34. |
The quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms under paragraph 38(a) may be a single amount or a range. |
ESRS E3
WATER AND MARINE RESOURCES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
Interaction with other ESRS
Disclosure requirements
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E3-1 – Policies related to water and marine resources |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E3-2 – Actions and resources related to water and marine resources |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement E3-3 – Targets related to water and marine resources |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E3-4 – Water consumption |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E3-5 – Anticipated financial effects from water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E3-1 – Policies related to water and marine resources |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E3-2 – Actions and resources related to water and marine resources policies |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement E3-3 – Targets related to water and marine resources |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E3-4 – Water consumption |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E3-5 – Anticipated financial effects from water and marine resources-related risks and opportunities |
Objective
1. |
The objective of this Standard is to specify Disclosure Requirements which will enable users of the
sustainability statement
to understand:
|
2. |
This Standard sets out Disclosure Requirements related to water and marine resources . With regard to “water”, this standard covers surface water and groundwater . It includes disclosure requirements on water consumption in the undertaking’s activities, products and services, as well as related information on water withdrawals and water discharges . |
3. |
With regard to “ marine resources ”, this standard covers the extraction and use of such resources, and associated economic activities. |
Interaction with other ESRS
4. |
The topic of water and
marine resources
is closely connected to other environmental sub- topics such as climate change,
pollution
,
biodiversity
and circular economy. Thus, to provide a comprehensive overview of what could be material to water and marine resources, relevant Disclosure Requirements are covered in other environmental ESRS as follows:
|
5. |
The undertaking’s impacts on water and marine resources affect people and communities. Material negative impacts on affected communities from water and marine resources -related impacts attributable to the undertaking are covered in ESRS S3 Affected communities. |
6. |
This Standard should be read in conjunction with ESRS 1 General requirements and ESRS 2 General disclosures. |
Disclosure requirements
ESRS 2 General disclosures
7. |
The requirements of this section should be read in conjunction with and reported alongside the disclosures required by ESRS 2 chapter 4 Impact, risk and opportunity management. |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities
8. |
The undertaking shall describe the process to identify material impacts, risks and opportunities and shall provide information on:
|
Disclosure Requirement E3-1 – Policies related to water and marine resources
9. |
The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to water and marine resources (72). |
10. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of its material water and marine resources -related impacts, risks and opportunities . |
11. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 9 shall contain the information on the policies the undertaking has in place to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to water and marine resources in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. |
12. |
The undertaking shall indicate whether and how its
policies
address the following matters where material:
|
Disclosure Requirement E3-2 – Actions and resources related to water and marine resources
15. |
The undertaking shall disclose its water and marine resources-related actions and the resources allocated to their implementation. |
16. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the key actions taken and planned to achieve the water and marine resources -related policy objectives and targets . |
17. |
The description of the actions and resources shall follow the principles defined in ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters. In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-A, the undertaking may specify to which layer in the mitigation hierarchy an action and |
18. |
Resources can be allocated to:
|
19. |
The undertaking shall specify actions and resources in relation to areas at water risk , including areas of high-water stress . |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement E3-3 – Targets related to water and marine resources
20. |
The undertaking shall disclose the water and marine resources-related targets it has set. |
21. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the targets the undertaking has adopted to support its water and marine resources-related policies and address its material water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities. |
22. |
The description of the targets shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets. |
23. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 20 shall indicate whether and how its
targets
relate to:
|
24. |
In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-T, the undertaking may specify whether
ecological thresholds
and entity-specific allocations were taken into consideration when setting
targets
. If so, the undertaking may specify:
|
25. |
The undertaking shall specify as part of the contextual information, whether the targets it has set and presented are mandatory (required by legislation) or voluntary. |
Disclosure Requirement E3-4 – Water consumption
26. |
The undertaking shall disclose information on its water consumption performance related to its material impacts, risks and opportunities. |
27. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the undertaking’s water consumption and any progress by the undertaking in relation to its targets. |
28. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 26 relates to own operations and shall include:
|
29. |
The undertaking shall provide information on its water intensity : total water consumption in its own operations in m3 per million EUR net revenue (76). |
Disclosure Requirement E3-5 – Anticipated financial effects from material water and marine resources-related risks and opportunities
30. |
The undertaking shall disclose the anticipated financial effects of material water and marine resources-related risks and opportunities. |
31. |
The information required by paragraph 30 is in addition to the information on current financial effects on the entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows for the reporting period required under ESRS 2 SBM-3 para 48 (d). |
32. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
|
33. |
The disclosure shall include:
|
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS E3. It supports the application of the disclosure requirements set out in this standard and has the same authority as the other parts of the Standard.
ESRS 2 GENERAL DISCLOSURES
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities
AR 1. |
When conducting a
materiality
assessment on environmental subtopics, the undertaking shall assess the materiality of water and marine resources in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, and may consider the four phases below, also known as the LEAP approach:
|
AR 2. |
The materiality assessment for ESRS E3 corresponds to the first three phases of this LEAP approach, the fourth phase addresses the outcome of the process. |
AR 3. |
The processes to assess the materiality of impacts, risks and opportunities shall consider the provisions in ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities, and IRO-2 Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement. |
AR 4. |
The sub-topics related to water and marine resources covered by the
materiality
assessment include:
|
AR 5. |
In phase 1, to locate where there are areas at water risk, and areas where there is an interface with
marine resources
that could lead to material impacts and
dependencies
in its own operations and along its upstream and downstream value chain, the undertaking may consider:
|
AR 6. |
The undertaking shall consider river basins as the relevant level for assessment of locations and combine that approach with an operational risk assessment of its facilities and the facilities of suppliers with material impacts and risks. |
AR 7. |
The undertaking shall consider the criteria for defining the status of water bodies according to the relevant Annexes of Directive 2000/60/EC (Water Framework Directive) as well as the guidance documents provided for implementation of the Water Framework Directive. The list of guidance documents can be accessed under the European Commission’s Environment home page. |
AR 8. |
In phase 2, to evaluate its impacts and
dependencies
for each priority location identified under AR 5, the undertaking may:
|
AR 9. |
For the identification of water and marine resources -related dependencies , the undertaking may rely on international classifications such as the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES). |
AR 10. |
When identifying its marine resources -related dependencies , the undertaking shall consider if it depends upon key marine resources-related commodities, including but not limited to gravels and seafood products. |
AR 11. |
Marine resources are defined according to their use by human societies and must be considered in relation to the pressure they are subject to. Some of the pressure indicators are presented in other ESRS, namely microplastics and emissions to water in ESRS E2 and plastic waste in ESRS E5. |
AR 12. |
Examples of
marine resources
dependencies
which may be considered by the undertaking are:
|
AR 13. |
In Phase 3, to assess its material
risks
and
opportunities
based on the results of Phases 1 and 2, the undertaking may :
|
AR 14. |
The undertaking may rely on primary, secondary or modelled data collection or other relevant approaches to assess material impacts, dependencies , risks and opportunities, including Commission Recommendation 2021/2279 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (Annex I – Product Environmental Footprint; Annex III – Organisation Environmental Footprint). |
AR 15. |
When providing information on the outcome of the
materiality
assessment, the undertaking shall consider:
|
Disclosure Requirement E3-1 – Policies related to water and marine resources
AR 16. |
The policies described under this Disclosure Requirement may be integrated in broader environmental or sustainability policies covering different subtopics. |
AR 17. |
When disclosing information under paragraph 9, the undertaking may disclose whether its
policies
:
|
AR 18. |
The undertaking may also disclose information about
policies
which:
|
Disclosure Requirement E3-2 – Actions and resources related to water and marine resources policies
AR 19. |
When disclosing information required under paragraph 15, the undertaking shall consider the actions , or action plans, contributing to address the material impacts, risks and opportunities identified. Useful guidance is provided by the Alliance for Water Stewardship (AWS). |
AR 20. |
Considering that water and marine resources are shared resources which may require collective actions , or action plans, involving other stakeholders , the undertaking may provide information on those specific collective actions, including information on other parties (competitors, suppliers , retailers, customers, other business partners, local communities and authorities, government agencies…) and specific information on the project, its specific contribution, its sponsors and other participants. |
AR 21. |
When providing information on capital expenditures, the undertaking may consider expenditures related, for example, to stormwater drain rehabilitation, pipelines, or machinery used to manufacture new low water-use products. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement E3-3 – Targets related to water and marine resources
AR 22. |
If the undertaking refers to ecological thresholds when setting targets , it may refer to the guidance provided by the Science-Based Targets Initiative for Nature (SBTN) in its interim guidance (Initial Guidance for Business, September 2020). It may also refer to any other guidance with a scientifically acknowledged methodology that enables the setting of science-based targets by identifying ecological thresholds and, if applicable, organisation-specific allocations. Ecological thresholds can be local, national and/or global. |
AR 23. |
The undertaking may provide
targets
relating to:
|
AR 24. |
If the undertaking provides targets on withdrawals, it may include water withdrawal from polluted soils and aquifers, and water withdrawn and treated for remediation purposes. |
AR 25. |
If the undertaking provides targets on discharges , it may include water discharges to groundwater such as reinjection to aquifers, or water returning to a groundwater source via a soakaway or a swale. |
AR 26. |
The targets may cover its own operations and/or its upstream and downstream value chain. |
AR 27. |
The undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related to the Substantial Contribution criteria for Water and Marine Resources as defined in the Commission delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 12(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. Where the Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) criteria for Water and Marine Resources as defined in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 10(3), Article 11(3), Article 13(2), Article 14(2), and Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 are not met, the undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related those DNSH criteria. |
Disclosure Requirement E3-4 – Water consumption
AR 28. |
The undertaking may operate in various areas at water risk . When disclosing information under paragraph 28 (b), the undertaking shall include such information only for those areas that have been identified as material in accordance with ESRS2 IRO-1 and ESRS2 SBM-3. |
AR 29. |
When disclosing contextual information on water consumption performance required by paragraph 26, the undertaking shall explain the calculation methodologies and more specifically the share of the measure obtained from direct measurement, from sampling and extrapolation, or from best estimates. |
AR 30. |
The undertaking may provide information on other breakdowns (i.e., per sector or segments). |
AR 31. |
When disclosing information required by paragraph 29 the undertaking may provide additional intensity ratios based on other denominators. |
AR 32. |
The undertaking may also provide information on its water withdrawals and water discharges . |
Disclosure Requirement E3-5 – Anticipated financial effects from material water and marine resources-related risks and opportunities
AR 33. |
The undertaking may include an assessment of its related products and services at risk over the short-, medium- and long-term, explaining how these are defined, how financial amounts are estimated, and which critical assumptions are made. |
AR 34. |
The quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms under paragraph 39(a) may be a single amount or a range. |
ESRS E4
BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEMS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
Interaction with other ESRS
Disclosure Requirements
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Strategy
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-1 – Transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems in strategy and business model |
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of processes to identify and assess material biodiversity and ecosystem-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-2 – Policies related to biodiversity and ecosystems |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-3 – Actions and resources related to biodiversity and ecosystems |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-4 – Targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-5 – Impact metrics related to biodiversity and ecosystems change |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-6 – Anticipated financial effects from biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-1 – Transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems in strategy and business model |
— |
Disclosure requirements related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material biodiversity and ecosystem-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-2 – Policies related to biodiversity and ecosystems |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-3 – Actions and resources related to biodiversity and ecosystems |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-4 – Targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-5 – Impact metrics related to biodiversity and ecosystems change |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E4-6 – Anticipated financial effects from biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities |
Objective
1. |
The objective of this Standard is to specify Disclosure Requirements which will enable users of the
sustainability statement
to understand:
|
2. |
This Standard sets out Disclosure Requirements related to the undertaking’s relationship to terrestrial, freshwater and marine habitats, ecosystems and populations of related fauna and flora species, including diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems and their interrelation with indigenous peoples and other affected communities. |
3. |
The terms “ biodiversity ” and “ biological diversity ” refer to the variability among living organisms from all sources including, inter alia, terrestrial, freshwater , marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part. |
Interaction with other ESRS
4. |
‘ Biodiversity and ecosystems ’ are closely connected to other environmental matters. The main direct drivers of biodiversity and ecosystems change are climate change, pollution , land-use change, freshwater -use change and sea-use change, direct exploitation of organisms and invasive alien species. These drivers are covered in this standard, except for climate change (covered by ESRS E1) and pollution (covered by ESRS E2). |
5. |
To obtain a comprehensive understanding of material
impacts
and
dependencies
on
biodiversity
and
ecosystems
, the Disclosure Requirements of other environmental ESRS should be read and interpreted in conjunction with the specific disclosure requirements of this Standard. The relevant disclosure requirements covered in other environmental ESRS are:
|
6. |
The undertaking’s impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems affect people and communities. When reporting on material negative impacts on affected communities from biodiversity and ecosystem change under ESRS E4, the undertaking shall consider the requirements of ESRS S3 Affected communities. |
7. |
This Standard should be read in conjunction with ESRS 1 General requirements and ESRS 2 General disclosures. |
Disclosure Requirements
ESRS 2 General disclosures
8. |
The requirements of this section shall be read in conjunction with the disclosures required by ESRS 2 Chapter 2 Governance, Chapter 3 Strategy and Chapter 4 Impact, risk and opportunity management. |
9. |
The resulting disclosures shall be presented alongside the disclosures required by ESRS 2, except for ESRS 2 SBM-3, for which the undertaking has an option to present the disclosures alongside the topical disclosures. |
10. |
In addition to the requirements in ESRS 2, this Standard also includes the topic specific Disclosure Requirement E4-1 Transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems in strategy and business model. |
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement E4-1 – Transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems in strategy and business model
11. |
The undertaking shall disclose how its biodiversity and ecosystem impacts, dependencies, risks and opportunities originate from and trigger adaptation of its strategy and business model. |
12. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the resilience of the undertaking’s strategy and business model in relation to biodiversity and ecosystems , and of the compatibility of the undertaking’s strategy and business model with regard to relevant local, national and global public policy targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems. |
13. |
The undertaking shall describe the resilience of its strategy and
business model
in relation to
biodiversity
and
ecosystems
. The description shall include:
|
14. |
If information specified in this disclosure requirement is disclosed by the undertaking as part of the information required under ESRS 2 SBM-3, the undertaking may refer to the information it has disclosed under ESRS 2 SBM-3. |
15. |
The undertaking may disclose its transition plan to improve and, ultimately, achieve alignment of its business model and strategy with the vision of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and its relevant goals and targets, the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, and with respecting planetary boundaries related to biosphere integrity and land-system change . |
Disclosure Requirement SBM 3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
16. |
The undertaking shall disclose:
|
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of processes to identify and assess material biodiversity and ecosystem-related impacts, risks, dependencies and opportunities
17. |
The undertaking shall describe its process to identify material impacts, risks, dependencies and opportunities. The description of the process shall include whether and how the undertaking:
|
18. |
The undertaking may disclose whether and how it has used
biodiversity
and
ecosystems
scenario analysis
to inform the identification and assessment of material risks and opportunities over short-, medium- and long-term time horizons. If the undertaking has used such scenario analysis, it may disclose the following information:
|
19. |
The undertaking shall specifically disclose:
|
Disclosure Requirement E4-2 – Policies related to biodiversity and ecosystems
20. |
The undertaking shall describe its adopted policies to manage its material impacts, risks, dependencies, and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems. |
21. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of its material biodiversity and ecosystem - related impacts , dependencies , risks and opportunities . |
22. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 20 shall contain the information on the policies the undertaking has in place to manage its material impacts, risks, dependencies and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters). |
23. |
In addition to the provisions of ESRS 2 MDR-P the undertaking shall describe whether and how its
biodiversity
and
ecosystems
-related
policies
:
|
24. |
The undertaking shall specifically disclose whether it has adopted:
|
Disclosure Requirement E4-3 – Actions and resources related to biodiversity and ecosystems
25. |
The undertaking shall disclose its biodiversity and ecosystems-related actions and the resources allocated to their implementation. |
26. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the key actions taken and planned that significantly contribute to the achievement of biodiversity and ecosystems -related policy objectives and targets . |
27. |
The description of key actions and resources shall follow the mandatory content defined in ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters. |
28. |
In addition, the undertaking :
|
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement E4-4 – Targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems
29. |
The undertaking shall disclose the biodiversity and ecosystem-related targets it has set. |
30. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to allow an understanding of the targets the undertaking has adopted to support its biodiversity and ecosystems policies and address its material related impacts , dependencies , risks and opportunities . |
31. |
The description of the targets shall follow the mandatory content defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets. |
32. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 29 shall include the following information:
|
Disclosure Requirement E4-5 – Impact metrics related to biodiversity and ecosystems change
33. |
The undertaking shall report metrics related to its material impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems. |
34. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the performance of the undertaking against impacts identified as material in the materiality assessment on biodiversity and ecosystems change. |
35. |
If the undertaking identified sites located in or near biodiversity-sensitive areas that it is negatively affecting (see paragraph 19(a)), the undertaking shall disclose the number and area (in hectares) of sites owned, leased or managed in or near these protected areas or key biodiversity areas. |
36. |
If the undertaking has identified material impacts with regards to land-use change, or impacts on the extent and condition of ecosystems , it may also disclose their land-use based on a Life Cycle Assessment. |
37. |
For datapoints specified in paragraphs 38 to 41, the undertaking shall consider its own operations. |
38. |
If the undertaking has concluded that it directly contributes to the
impact drivers
of
land-use change
,
freshwater
-use change and/or sea-use change, it shall report relevant
metrics.
The undertaking may disclose metrics that measure:
|
39. |
If the undertaking concluded that it directly contributes to the accidental or voluntary introduction of invasive alien species, the undertaking may disclose the metrics it uses to manage pathways of introduction and spread of invasive alien species and the risks posed by invasive alien species. |
40. |
If the undertaking identified material impacts related to the state of species, the undertaking may report
metrics
it considers relevant. The undertaking may:
|
41. |
If the undertaking identified material impacts related to ecosystems, it may disclose:
|
Disclosure Requirement E4-6 – Anticipated financial effects from material biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities
42. |
The undertaking shall disclose its anticipated financial effects of material biodiversity- and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities. |
43. |
The information required by paragraph 42 is in addition to the information on current financial effects on the entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows for the reporting period required under ESRS 2 SBM-3 para 48 (d). |
44. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
|
45. |
The disclosure shall include:
|
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS E4. It supports the application of the disclosure requirements set out in this standard and has the same authority as the other parts of the standard.
ESRS 2 GENERAL DISCLOSURES
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement E4-1 – Transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems in strategy and business model
AR 1. |
If disclosing a transition plan, the undertaking may:
|
AR 2. |
If disclosing a transition plan, the undertaking may, for example, refer to the following
targets
from the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030:
|
AR 3. |
If disclosing a transition plan, the undertaking may also refer to the Sustainable Development Goals, in particular:
|
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure requirements related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material biodiversity and ecosystem-related impacts, risks and opportunities
AR 4. |
The
materiality
assessment under ESRS E4 includes the undertaking’s:
|
AR 5. |
When assessing the materiality of impacts , dependencies , risks and opportunities the undertaking shall consider the provisions in ESRS 2 IRO-1 and ESRS 1 Chapter 3 Double materiality as the basis for sustainability disclosures and describe its considerations. |
AR 6. |
The undertaking shall assess the materiality of biodiversity and ecosystems in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain , and may conduct its materiality assessment in line with the first three phases of the LEAP approach: Locate (paragraph AR 7), Evaluate (paragraph AR 8) and Assess (paragraph AR 9). |
AR 7. |
Phase 1 relates to the localisation of relevant
sites
regarding its interface with
biodiversity
and
ecosystems
. To identify these relevant sites the undertaking may:
|
AR 8. |
In Phase 2, to evaluate its actual or potential impacts and
dependencies
on
biodiversity
and
ecosystems
for relevant
sites
, the undertaking may:
|
AR 9. |
In Phase 3, to assesses its material
risks
and
opportunities
based on the results of Phases 1 and 2, the undertaking may consider the following categories:
Presentation of information: |
AR 10. |
The undertaking may consider the tables below to facilitate its
materiality
assessment of material
sites
identified under paragraph AR 7:
With regard to AR 7(e), the undertaking may consider using the table below:
|
Disclosure Requirement E4-2 – Policies related to biodiversity and ecosystems
AR 11. |
The policies described under this Disclosure Requirement may be integrated in broader environmental or sustainability policies covering different subtopics. |
AR 12. |
The undertaking may also provide information on how the
policy
refers to the production, sourcing or consumption of raw materials, and in particular how it:
|
AR 13. |
The undertaking may disclose connections and alignment with other global goals and agreements such as the SDGs 2, 6, 14 and 15 or any other well established global convention related to biodiversity and ecosystems. |
AR 14. |
When disclosing policies related to social consequences of biodiversity and ecosystems related dependencies and impacts under 23 (f), the undertaking may notably refer to the Nagoya Protocol and the Convention for Biological Diversity (CBD). |
AR 15. |
When disclosing information about whether and how its
policies
address the social consequences of biodiversity and ecosystems-related
impacts
under paragraph 23(f), the undertaking may provide information in relation to:
|
AR 16. |
The undertaking may also explain how its
policy
enables it to:
|
AR 17. |
When disclosing its
policies
, if referring to third-party standards of conduct, the undertaking may disclose whether the standard used:
|
Disclosure Requirement E4-3 – Actions and resources related to biodiversity and ecosystems
AR 18. |
The undertaking may relate significant monetary amounts of CapEx and OpEx required to implement the actions taken or planned to:
|
AR 19. |
The undertaking may disclose whether it considers an “avoidance” action plan, which prevents damaging
actions
before they take place. Avoidance often involves a decision to deviate from the business-as-usual project development path. An example of avoidance is altering the
biodiversity
and ecosystem footprint of a project to avoid destruction of natural
habitat
on the
site
and/or establishing set-asides where priority biodiversity values are present and will be conserved. At a minimum, avoidance should be considered where there are biodiversity and ecosystem-related values that are in one of the following categories: particularly vulnerable and irreplaceable, of particular concern to
stakeholders
, or where a cautious approach is warranted due to uncertainty about impact assessment or about the efficacy of management measures. The three main types of avoidance are defined below:
|
AR 20. |
With regard to key
actions
, the undertaking may disclose:
|
AR 21. |
In the context of this Disclosure Requirement, “local and indigenous knowledge” refer to the understandings, skills and philosophies developed by societies with long histories of interaction with their natural surroundings. For rural and indigenous peoples , local knowledge informs decision-making about fundamental aspects of day-to-day life. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement E4-4 – Targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems
AR 22. |
The undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related to the Substantial Contribution criteria for Biodiversity as defined in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. Where the Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) criteria for Biodiversity as defined in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 10(3), Article 11(3), Article 12(2), Article 13(2), and Article 14(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 are not met, the undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related those DNSH critera. |
AR 23. |
When disclosing information required under paragraph 29 for the purpose of setting targets the undertaking shall consider the need for an informed and willing consent of local and indigenous peoples , the need for appropriate consultations and the need to respect the decisions of these communities. |
AR 24. |
The
targets
related to material impacts may be presented in a table as illustrated below:
|
AR 25. |
The
targets
related to the potentially material sustainability matters listed in paragraph AR 4 of this Standard, may be presented in a table as illustrated below:
|
AR 26. |
Measurable
targets
related to
biodiversity
and
ecosystems
may be expressed as:
|
Disclosure Requirement E4-5 – Impact metrics related to biodiversity and ecosystems change
AR 27. |
When preparing the information required under this Disclosure Requirement, the undertaking shall consider and may describe:
|
AR 28. |
The undertaking shall disclose metrics that are verifiable and that are technically and scientifically robust considering the appropriate time scales geographies, and may disclose how its selected metrics correspond to those criteria. To ensure that the metric is relevant there should be a clear relationship between the indicator and the purpose of the measurement. Uncertainties should be reduced as far as possible. Data or mechanisms used should be supported by well-established organisations and updated over time. Robust modelled data and expert judgment can be used where data gaps exist. The methodology shall be sufficiently detailed to allow for meaningful comparison of impacts and mitigation activities over time. Information gathering processes and definitions must be systematically applied. This enables a meaningful review of the undertaking’s performance over time and helps internal and peer comparison. |
AR 29. |
If a metric corresponds to a target, the baseline for both shall be aligned. The biodiversity baseline is an essential component of the larger biodiversity and ecosystems management process. The baseline is necessary to inform impact assessment and management planning, as well as monitoring and adaptive management. |
AR 30. |
Methodologies available to collect data and measure the undertakings’ impacts on
biodiversity
and
ecosystems
may be separated into three categories as follows:
|
AR 31. |
With regard to life cycle assessment for land-use, the undertaking may refer to the “Land-use related environmental indicators for Life Cycle Assessment” by the Joint Research Center. |
AR 32. |
With regard to the introduction of invasive alien species, the undertaking may disclose the pathways and number of invasive alien species and the extent of surface covered by invasive alien species. |
AR 33. |
With regard to metrics on the extent and condition of ecosystems , useful guidance can be found in the work of the United Nations System of Environmental Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounting (UN SEEA EA). |
AR 34. |
The undertaking may disclose in units of area (e.g., m2 or ha) on land-use using guidance provided by the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) (89):
|
AR 35. |
The undertaking may disclose, for example, land cover change, which is the physical representation of the drivers “habitat modification” and “industrial and domestic activities”, i.e., the man-made or natural change of the physical properties of the earth’s surface at a specific location. |
AR 36. |
Land cover is a typical variable that can be assessed with earth observation data. |
AR 37. |
When reporting on material impacts related to the
ecosystems
, the undertaking may, in addition to the extent and condition of ecosystems, also consider the functioning of ecosystems by using:
|
AR 38. |
At the ecosystem level, data layers reflecting change in the extent and condition of ecosystems may be applied, including levels of habitat fragmentation and connectivity. |
Disclosure Requirement E4-6 – Anticipated financial effects from material biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities
AR 39. |
The undertaking may include an assessment of its related products and services at risk over the short-, medium- and long-term, explaining how these are defined, how financial amounts are estimated, and which critical assumptions are made. |
AR 40. |
The quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms under paragraph 45(a) may be a single amount or a range. |
ESRS E5
RESOUCE USE AND CIRCULAR ECONOMY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
Interactions with other ESRS
Disclosure Requirements
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material resource use and circular economy-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-1 – Policies related to resource use and circular economy |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-2 – Actions and resources related to resource use and circular economy |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-3 – Targets related to resource use and circular economy |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-4 – Resource inflows |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-5 – Resource outflows |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-6 – Anticipated financial effects from resource use and circular economy-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material resource use and circular economy-related impacts, risks and opportunities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-1 – Policies related to resource use and circular economy |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-2 – Actions and resources in relation to resource use and circular economy |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-3 - Targets related to resource use and circular economy |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-4 - Resource inflows |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-5 - Resource outflows |
— |
Disclosure Requirement E5-6 – Anticipated financial effects from resource use and circular economy-related risks and opportunities |
Objective
1. |
The objective of this Standard is to specify Disclosure Requirements which will enable users of the
sustainability statement
to understand:
|
2. |
This Standard sets out Disclosure Requirements related to “resource use” and “circular economy” and in particular on:
|
3. |
Circular economy means an economic system in which the value of products, materials and other resources in the economy is maintained for as long as possible, enhancing their efficient use in production and consumption, thereby reducing the environmental impact of their use, minimising waste and the release of hazardous substances at all stages of their life cycle, including through the application of the waste hierarchy . The goal is to maximise and maintain the value of the technical and biological resources, products and materials by creating a system that allows for durability , optimal use or re-use, refurbishment, remanufacturing, recycling and nutrient cycling. |
4. |
This Standard builds on relevant EU legislative frameworks and policies including the EU Circular Economy Action Plan, Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (90) (Waste Framework Directive) and the EU industrial strategy. |
5. |
To evaluate the transition from business as usual, meaning an economy in which finite resources are extracted to make products that are used and then thrown away (“take-make-waste”), to a circular economic system, this Standard relies on the identification of the physical flows of resources, materials and products used and generated by the undertaking through Disclosure Requirement E5-4 Resource inflows and Disclosure Requirement E5-5 Resource outflows. |
Interactions with other ESRS
6. |
Resource use is a major driver of other environmental impacts such as climate change, pollution , water and marine resources and biodiversity. A circular economy is a system that tends towards sustainable use of resources in extraction, processing, production, consumption and management of waste . Such system brings multiple environmental benefits, in particular, the reduction of material and energy consumption and emissions into the air (greenhouse gas emissions or other pollution), the limitation of water withdrawals and discharges and the regeneration of nature limiting the impact on biodiversity. |
7. |
To provide a comprehensive overview of which other environmental matters could be material to resource use and circular economy, relevant disclosure requirements are covered in other environmental ESRS as follows:
|
8. |
The undertaking’s impacts related to resource use and circular economy, in particular impacts related to waste , can affect people and communities. Material negative impacts on affected communities from resource use and circular economy attributable to the undertaking are covered in ESRS S3 Affected communities. The efficient and circular use of resources also benefits competitiveness and economic wellbeing |
9. |
This Standard should be read in conjunction with ESRS 1 General requirements and ESRS 2 General disclosures. |
Disclosure Requirements
ESRS 2 General disclosures
10. |
The requirements of this section should be read in conjunction with and reported alongside the disclosures required by ESRS 2 chapter 4 Impact, risk and opportunity management. |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material resource use and circular economy-related impacts, risks and opportunities
11. |
The undertaking shall describe the process to identify material
impacts, risks
and
opportunities
related to resource use and circular economy, in particular regarding
resource inflows
,
resource outflows
and
waste
, and shall provide information on:
|
Disclosure Requirement E5-1 – Policies related to resource use and circular economy
12. |
The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource use and circular economy. |
13. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource use and circular economy . |
14. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 12 shall contain the information on the policies the undertaking has in place to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource use and circular economy in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. |
15. |
In the summary, the undertaking shall indicate whether and how its policies address the following matters where material:
|
16. |
Policies shall address material impacts, risks and opportunities in its own operations and along its upstream and downstream value chain. |
Disclosure Requirement E5-2 – Actions and resources related to resource use and circular economy
17. |
The undertaking shall disclose its resource use and circular economy actions and the resources allocated to their implementation. |
18. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the key actions taken and planned to achieve the resource use and circular economy-related policy objectives and targets . |
19. |
The description of the resource use and circular economy-related actions and resources allocated shall follow the principles defined in ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters. |
20. |
In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-A, the undertaking may specify whether and how an action and resources cover:
|
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement E5-3 – Targets related to resource use and circular economy
21. |
The undertaking shall disclose the resource use and circular economy-related targets it has set. |
22. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the targets the undertaking has adopted to support its resource use and circular economy policy and to address its material impacts, risks and opportunities. |
23. |
The description of the targets shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets. |
24. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 21 shall indicate whether and how the undertaking’s
targets
relate to
resource inflows
and
resource
outflows
, including
waste
and products and materials, and, more specifically to:
|
25. |
The undertaking shall specify to which layer of the waste hierarchy the target relates. |
26. |
In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-T, the undertaking may specify whether
ecological thresholds
and entity-specific allocations were taken into consideration when setting
targets
. If so, the undertaking may specify:
|
27. |
The undertaking shall specify as part of the contextual information, whether the targets it has set and presented are mandatory (required by legislation) or voluntary. |
Disclosure Requirement E5-4 – Resource inflows
28. |
The undertaking shall disclose information on its resource inflows related to its material impacts, risks and opportunities. |
29. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the resource use in the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream value chain. |
30. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 28 shall include a description of its resource inflows where material: products (including packaging ) and materials (specifying critical raw materials and rare earths), water and property, plant and equipment used in the undertaking’s own operations and along its upstream value chain. |
31. |
When an undertaking assesses that resource inflows is a material sustainability matter, it shall disclose the following information about the materials used to manufacture the undertaking’s products and services during the reporting period, in tonnes or kilogrammes:
|
32. |
The undertaking shall provide information on the methodologies used to calculate the data. It shall specify whether the data is sourced from direct measurement or estimations, and disclose the key assumptions used. |
Disclosure Requirement E5-5 – Resource outflows
33. |
The undertaking shall disclose information on its resource outflows, including waste, related to its material impacts, risks and opportunities. |
34. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
|
Products and materials
35. |
The undertaking shall provide a description of the key products and materials that come out of the undertaking’s production process and that are designed along circular principles, including durability , reusability, repairability, disassembly, remanufacturing, refurbishment, recycling , recirculation by the biological cycle, or optimisation of the use of the product or material through other circular business models. |
36. |
Undertakings for which outflows are material shall disclose:
|
Waste
37. |
The undertaking shall disclose the following information on its total amount of
waste
from its own operations, in tonnes or kilogrammes:
|
38. |
When disclosing the composition of the
waste
, the undertaking shall specify:
|
39. |
The undertaking shall also disclose the total amount of hazardous waste and radioactive waste generated by the undertaking, where radioactive waste is defined in Article 3(7) of Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom (92). |
40. |
The undertaking shall provide contextual information on the methodologies used to calculate the data and in particular the criteria and assumptions used to determine and classify products designed along circular principles under paragraph 35. It shall specify whether the data is sourced from direct measurement or estimations; and disclose the key assumptions used. |
Disclosure Requirement E5-6 – Anticipated financial effects from material resource use and circular economy-related risks and opportunities
41. |
The undertaking shall disclose the anticipated financial effects of material risks and opportunities arising from resource use and circular economy-related impacts. |
42. |
The information required by paragraph 41 is in addition the information on current financial effects on the entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows for the reporting period required under ESRS 2 SBM-3 para 48 (d). The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
|
43. |
The disclosure shall include:
|
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS E5. It supports the application of the disclosure requirements set out in this standard and has the same authority as the other parts of the standard.
ESRS 2 GENERAL DISCLOSURES
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material resource use and circular economy-related impacts, risks and opportunities
AR 1. |
When conducting a
materiality
assessment on environmental subtopics, the undertaking shall assess the materiality of resource use and circular economy in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, and may consider the four phases below, also known as the LEAP approach:
|
AR 2. |
With regard to ESRS E5, phases 1 and 2 rely mainly on the materiality assessments conducted under ESRS E1 (including energy consumption), ESRS E2 (pollution), ESRS E3 (marine resources, water consumption) and ESRS E4 (biodiversity, ecosystems, raw materials). Indeed, circular economy eventually aims at reducing the environmental impact of the use of products, materials and other resources, minimizing waste and the release of hazardous substances and hence at reducing impacts on nature. This application requirement focuses mainly on the third phase of this LEAP approach, while the fourth phase addresses the outcome of the process. |
AR 3. |
The process to assess the materiality of impacts , dependencies , risks and opportunities shall consider the provisions in ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities and IRO-2 Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement. |
AR 4. |
The sub-topics related to resource use and
circular economy
covered by the
materiality
assessment include:
|
AR 5. |
In Phase 3, to assess its material
risks
and
opportunities
based on the results of Phases 1 and 2, the undertaking may:
|
AR 6. |
The undertaking may consider the following methodologies to assess its
impacts, risks
and
opportunities
in its own operations and along its upstream and downstream
value chain
:
|
AR 7. |
When providing information on the outcome of the
materiality
assessment, the undertaking shall consider:
|
Disclosure Requirement E5-1 – Policies related to resource use and circular economy
AR 8. |
The policies described under this Disclosure Requirement may be integrated in broader environmental or sustainability policies covering different subtopics. |
AR 9. |
When providing information on its policies, the undertaking shall consider whether and how its policies address:
|
AR 10. |
When defining its policies, the undertaking may consider the Paper on “Categorisation system for the circular economy”, which describes circular design and production models, circular use models, circular value recovery models and circular support along the principles of the nine circular economy “R” strategies or principles: refuse, rethink, reduce, re-use, repair, refurbish, remanufacture, repurpose and recycle. |
Disclosure Requirement E5-2 – Actions and resources in relation to resource use and circular economy
AR 11. |
When providing information under paragraph 17 and considering that resources are shared and that circular economy strategies may require collective actions, the undertaking may specify the actions taken to engage with its upstream and downstream value chain and/or its local network on the development of collaborations or initiatives increasing the circularity of products and materials. |
AR 12. |
In particular, the undertaking may specify the following:
|
AR 13. |
The actions may cover the undertaking’s own operations and/or its upstream and downstream value chain. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement E5-3 - Targets related to resource use and circular economy
AR 14. |
If the undertaking refers to ecological thresholds to set targets , it may refer to the guidance provided by the Science-Based Targets Initiative for Nature (SBTN) in its interim guidance (Initial Guidance for Business, September 2020) or any other guidance with a scientifically acknowledged methodology that allows to set science-based targets by identifying ecological thresholds and, if applicable, organisation-specific allocations. Ecological thresholds can be local, national and/or global. |
AR 15. |
When providing information on targets , the undertaking shall prioritise targets in absolute value. |
AR 16. |
When providing information targets according to paragraph 24, the undertaking shall consider the production phase, the use phase, and the end of functional life of products and materials. |
AR 17. |
When providing information on targets related to virgin renewable raw material under paragraph 24(c), the undertaking shall consider how those targets may impact biodiversity loss , also in light of ESRS E4. |
AR 18. |
The undertaking may disclose other targets under paragraph 24(f) including in relation to sustainable sourcing. If so, the undertaking shall explain the definition of sustainable sourcing it has adopted and how it relates to the objective set out in paragraph 22. |
AR 19. |
The targets may cover the undertaking’s own operations and/or its upstream and downstream value chain. |
AR 20. |
The undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related to the Substantial Contribution criteria for Circular Economy as defined in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. Where the Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) criteria for Circular Economy as defined in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 10(3), Article 11(3), Article 12(2), Article 14(2), and Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 are not met, the undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related those DNSH criteria. |
Disclosure Requirement E5-4 - Resource inflows
AR 21. |
Resource inflows may cover the following categories: IT equipment, textiles, furniture, buildings, heavy machinery, mid-weight machinery, light machinery, heavy transport, mid-weight transport, light transport and warehousing equipment. With regard to materials, resource inflow indicators include raw materials, associated process materials , and semi-manufactured goods or parts. |
AR 22. |
When the undertaking is subject to paragraph 31, it may also provide transparency on the materials that are sourced from by-products / waste stream (e.g., offcuts of a material that has not previously been in a product). |
AR 23. |
The denominator of the percentage indicator required under paragraphs 31(b) and 31(c) is the overall total weight of materials used during the reporting period. |
AR 24. |
The reported usage data are to reflect the material in its original state, and not to be presented with further data manipulation, such as reporting it as “dry weight”. |
AR 25. |
In cases where there is an overlap between categories of reused, recycled, the undertaking shall specify how double counting was avoided and the choices that were made. |
Disclosure Requirement E5-5 - Resource outflows
AR 26. |
Products and materials information to be provided under paragraph 35 refers to all materials and products that come out of the undertaking’s production process and that a company puts on the market (including packaging ). |
AR 27. |
When compiling the rate, the undertaking shall use as denominator the overall total weight of materials used during the reporting period. |
AR 28. |
The undertaking may disclose its engagement in product end-of-life waste management , for example through extended producer responsibility schemes or take-back schemes. |
AR 29. |
Type of waste is to be understood as hazardous waste or non-hazardous waste. Some specific waste, such as radioactive waste, may also be presented as a separate type. |
AR 30. |
When considering the waste streams relevant to its sectors or activities, the undertaking may consider the list of waste descriptions from the European Waste Catalogue. |
AR 31. |
Examples of other types of recovery operations under paragraph 37(b)iii may be found in Annex II of Directive 2008/98/EC (Waste Framework Directive). |
AR 32. |
Examples of other types of disposal operations under paragraph 37(c)iii may be found in Annex I of Directive 2008/98/EC (Waste Framework Directive). |
AR 33. |
When providing contextual information under paragraph 40 the undertaking may:
|
Disclosure Requirement E5-6 – Anticipated financial effects from material resource use and circular economy-related risks and opportunities
AR 34. |
When providing information under paragraph 42(b), the undertaking may illustrate and describe how it intends to strengthen value retention. |
AR 35. |
The undertaking may include an assessment of its related products and services at risk over the short-, medium- and long-term, explaining how these are defined, how financial amounts are estimated, and which critical assumptions are made. |
AR 36. |
The quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms under paragraph 43(a) may be a range. |
ESRS S1
OWN WORKFORCE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
Interaction with other ESRS
Disclosure requirements
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Strategy
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders |
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
Impacts, risks and opportunities management
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-1 – Policies related to own workforce |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-2 – Processes for engaging with own workers and workers’ representatives about impacts |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workers to raise concerns |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-4 – Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-6 – Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-7 – Characteristics of non-employee workers in the undertaking’s own workforce |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-8 – Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-9 – Diversity metrics |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-10 – Adequate wages |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-11 – Social protection |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-12– Persons with disabilities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-13 – Training and skills development metrics |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-14 – Health and safety metrics |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-15 – Work-life balance metrics |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-16 – Compensation metrics (pay gap and total compensation) |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-17 – Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
– |
Objective |
– |
ESRS 2 General Disclosures |
Strategy
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders |
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction of with strategy and business model |
Impacts, risks and opportunities management
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-1 – Policies related to own workforce |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-2 – Processes for engaging with own workers and workers' representatives about impacts |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1- 3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workers to raise concerns |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-4 – Taking action on material impacts and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions and approaches |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-5 – Targets related to managing material impacts, advancing positive impacts, as well as to risks and opportunities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-6 – Characteristics of the Undertaking’s Employees |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-7 – Characteristics of non-employee workers in the undertaking’s own workforce |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-8 – Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-9 – Diversity metrics |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-10 – Adequate Wages |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-11 – Social protection |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-12 – Persons with disabilities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-13 – Training and Skills Development metrics |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-14 – Health and safety metrics |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-15 – Work-life balance |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-16 – Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration) |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S1-17 – Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts |
Appendix A.1: |
Application Requirements for ESRS 2 related disclosures |
Appendix A.2: |
Application Requirements for ESRS S1-1 Policies related to own workforce |
Appendix A.3: |
Application Requirements for ESRS S1–4 Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions |
Appendix A.4: |
Application Requirements for ESRS S1–5 Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities |
Objective
1. |
The objective of this Standard is to specify disclosure requirements which will enable
users
of the
sustainability statement
to understand the undertaking’s material
impacts
on its
own workforce
, as well as related material
risks
and
opportunities
, including:
|
2. |
In order to meet the objective, this Standard also requires an explanation of the general approach the undertaking takes to identify and manage any material actual and potential
impacts
on its
own workforce
in relation to the following social, including human rights, factors or matters:
|
3. |
This Standard also requires an explanation of how such impacts , as well as the undertaking’s dependencies on its own workforce , can create material risks or opportunities for the undertaking. For example, on the matter of equal opportunities, discrimination in hiring and promotion against women can reduce the undertaking’s access to qualified labour and harm its reputation. Conversely, policies to increase the representation of women in the workforce and in upper levels of management can have positive effects, such as increasing the pool of qualified labour and improving the undertaking’s reputation. |
4. |
This Standard covers an undertaking’s own workforce , which is understood to include both people who are in an employment relationship with the undertaking (“ employees ”) and non-employees who are either people with contracts with the undertaking to supply labour (“self-employed people”) or people provided by undertakings primarily engaged in “employment activities” (NACE Code N78). See Application Requirement 3 for examples of who falls under own workforce. The information required to be disclosed with regard to non-employees shall not affect their status pursuant to applicable labour law. |
5. |
This Standard does not cover workers in the undertaking’s upstream or downstream value chain ; these categories of workers are covered in ESRS S2 Workers in the value chain. |
6. |
The Standard requires undertakings to describe their own workforce , including key characteristics of the employees and non-employees that are part of it. This description provides users with an understanding of the structure of the undertaking’s own workforce and helps to contextualise information provided through other disclosures. |
7. |
The objective of the Standard is also to enable users to understand the extent to which the undertaking aligns or complies with international and European human rights instruments and conventions, including the International Bill of Human Rights, the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and ILO fundamental conventions, the UN Convention on Persons with Disabilities, the European Convention of Human Rights, the revised European Social Charter, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the EU policy priorities as set out by the European Pillar of Social Rights, and Union legislation, including the EU labour law acquis. |
Interaction with other ESRS
8. |
This Standard shall be read in conjunction with ESRS 1 General principles and ESRS 2 General requirements. |
9. |
This Standard shall be read in conjunction with ESRS S2 Workers in the value chain, ESRS S3 Affected communities and ESRS S4 Consumers and end-users. |
10. |
The reporting under this Standard shall be consistent, coherent and where relevant clearly linked with reporting on the undertaking’s own workforce under ESRS S2, in order to ensure effective reporting. |
Disclosure requirements
ESRS 2 General disclosures
11. |
The requirements of this section should be read in conjunction with the disclosures required by ESRS 2 on Strategy (SBM). The resulting disclosures shall be presented alongside the disclosures required by ESRS 2, except for ESRS 2 SBM-3, for which the undertaking has an option to present the disclosures alongside the topical disclosure. |
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
12. |
When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-2, the undertaking shall disclose how the interests, views, and rights of people in its own workforce, including respect for their human rights, inform its strategy and business model. The undertaking’s own workforce is a key group of affected stakeholders . |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
13. |
When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose:
|
14. |
When fulfilling the requirements of paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose whether all people in its
own workforce
who could be materially impacted by the undertaking are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2. These material
impacts
shall include impacts that are connected with the undertaking’s own operations and its
value chain,
including through its products or services, as well as through its business relationships. In addition, the undertaking shall provide the following information:
|
15. |
In describing the main types of people in its own workforce who are or could be negatively affected, based on the materiality assessment set out in ESRS 2 IRO 1, the undertaking shall disclose whether and how it has developed an understanding of how people with particular characteristics, those working in particular contexts, or those undertaking particular activities may be at greater risk of harm. |
16. |
The undertaking shall disclose which, if any, of its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on people in its own workforce relate to specific groups of people (for example, particular age groups, or people working in a particular factory or country) rather than to all of its own workforce (for example, a general pay cut, or training offered to all people in its own workforce). |
Impacts, risks and opportunities management
Disclosure Requirement S1-1 – Policies related to own workforce
17. |
The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts on its own workforce, as well as associated material risks and opportunities. |
18. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of material impacts on the undertaking’s own workforce specifically, as well as policies that cover material impacts, risks and opportunities related to its own workforce. |
19. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 17 shall contain the information on the undertaking’s policies to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to its own workforce in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. In addition, the undertaking shall specify if such policies cover specific groups within its own workforce or all of its own workforce. |
20. |
The undertaking shall describe its human rights
policy
commitments (96) that are relevant to its
own workforce
, including those processes and mechanisms to monitor compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (97). In its disclosure it shall focus on those matters that are material in relation to, as well as its general approach to:
|
21. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how its policies with regard to its own workforce are aligned with relevant internationally recognised instruments, including the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (98). |
22. |
The undertaking shall state whether its policies in relation to its own workforce explicitly address trafficking in human beings (99), forced labour or compulsory labour and child labour. |
23. |
The undertaking shall state whether it has a workplace accident prevention policy or management system (100). |
24. |
The undertaking shall disclose:
|
Disclosure Requirement S1-2 – Processes for engaging with own workforce and workers’ representatives about impacts
25. |
The undertaking shall disclose its general processes for engaging with people in its own workforce and workers' representatives about actual and potential impacts on its own workforce. |
26. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of how the undertaking engages, as part of its ongoing due diligence process, with people in its own workforce and workers' representatives about material, actual and potential, positive and/or negative impacts that do or are likely to affect them, and whether and how perspectives of its own workforces are taken into account in the decision-making processes of the undertaking. |
27. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how the perspectives of its
own workforce
inform its decisions or activities aimed at managing the actual and potential
impacts
on its own workforce. This shall include, where relevant, an explanation of:
|
28. |
Where applicable, the undertaking shall disclose the steps it takes to gain insight into the perspectives of people in its own workforce who may be particularly vulnerable to impacts and/or marginalised (for example, women, migrants, people with disabilities). |
29. |
If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a general process to engage with its own workforce , it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a process in place. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workforce to raise concerns
30. |
The undertaking shall describe the processes it has in place to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of negative impacts on people in its own workforce that the undertaking is connected with, as well as channels available to its own workforce to raise concerns and have them addressed. |
31. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the formal means by which the undertaking’s own workforce can make their concerns and needs known directly to the undertaking and/or through which the undertaking supports the availability of such channels (for example, grievance mechanisms ) in the workplace, and how follow up is carried out with the people concerned regarding the issues raised and the effectiveness of these channels. |
32. |
The undertaking shall describe the processes in place to cover the matters defined within paragraph 2 of the Objective section by disclosing the following information:
|
33. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it assesses that people in its own workforce are aware of, and trust, these structures or processes as a way to raise their concerns or needs and have them addressed. In addition, the undertaking shall disclose whether it has policies in place regarding the protection of individuals that use them, including workers’ representatives, against retaliation. If such information has been disclosed in accordance with ESRS G1-1, the undertaking may refer to that information. |
34. |
If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a channel for raising concerns and/or does not support the availability of such a channel in the workplace for its own workforce, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a channel in place. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-4 – Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions
35. |
The undertaking shall disclose how it takes action to address material negative and positive impacts, and to manage material risks and pursue material opportunities related to its own workforce, and the effectiveness of those actions. |
36. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is twofold. Firstly, it is to enable an understanding of any
actions
and initiatives through which the undertaking seeks to:
Secondly, it is to enable an understanding of the ways in which the undertaking is addressing the material risks and pursuing the material opportunities related to its own workforce. |
37. |
The undertaking shall provide a summarised description of the action plans and resources to manage its material impacts, risks , and opportunities related to its own workforce in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters. |
38. |
In relation to the material
impacts
related to its
own workforce
, the undertaking shall describe:
|
39. |
In relation to paragraph 36, the undertaking shall describe the processes through which it identifies what action is needed and appropriate in response to a particular actual or potential negative impact on its own workforce . |
40. |
In relation to material
risks
and
opportunities
, the undertaking shall describe:
|
41. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it ensures that its own practices do not cause or contribute to material negative impacts on own workforce , including, where relevant, its practices in relation to procurement, sales and data use. This may include disclosing what approach is taken when tensions arise between the prevention or mitigation of material negative impacts and other business pressures. |
42. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraph 40, the undertaking shall consider ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets if it evaluates the effectiveness of an action by setting a target. |
43. |
The undertaking shall disclose what resources are allocated to the management of its material impacts, with information that allows users to gain an understanding of how the material impacts are managed. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement S1-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
44. |
The undertaking shall disclose the time-bound and outcome-oriented targets it may have set related to:
|
45. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking is using outcome-oriented targets to drive and measure its progress in addressing its material negative impacts and/or advancing positive impacts on its own workforce , and/or in managing material risks and opportunities related to its own workforce. |
46. |
The summarised description of the targets set to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to the undertaking’s own workforce shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T. |
47. |
The undertaking shall disclose the process for setting the
targets
, including whether and how the undertaking engaged directly with its
own workforce
or
workers’ representatives
in:
|
Disclosure Requirement S1-6 – Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees
48. |
The undertaking shall describe key characteristics of employees in its own workforce. |
49. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide insight into the undertaking’s approach to employment, including the scope and nature of impacts arising from its employment practices, to provide contextual information that aids an understanding of the information reported in other disclosures, and to serve as the basis for calculation for quantitative metrics to be disclosed under other disclosure requirements in this Standard. |
50. |
In addition to the information required by paragraph 40(a)iii of ESRS 2 General Disclosures, the undertaking shall disclose:
|
51. |
For the information specified in point (b) of paragraph 50, the undertaking may in addition disclose the breakdown by region. |
52. |
The undertaking may disclose by head count or full time equivalent (FTE) the following information:
|
Disclosure Requirement S1-7 – Characteristics of non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce
53. |
The undertaking shall describe key characteristics of non-employees in its own workforce. |
54. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide insight into the undertaking’s approach to employment, including the scope and nature of impacts arising from its employment practices, to provide contextual information that aids the understanding of the information reported in other disclosures, and to serve as the basis for calculation for quantitative metrics to be disclosed under other disclosure requirements in this Standard. It also allows an understanding of how much the undertaking relies on non-employees as part of its workforce. |
55. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 53 shall include:
|
56. |
For the information specified in point (a) of paragraph 55, the undertaking may disclose the most common types of non-employees (for example, self-employed people, people provided by undertakings primarily engaged in employment activities, and other types relevant to the undertaking), their relationship with the undertaking, and the type of work that they perform. |
57. |
Where data is not available, the undertaking shall estimate the number and state that it has done so. When the undertaking performs estimates, it shall describe the basis of preparation of this estimation. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-8 – Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue
58. |
The undertaking shall disclose information on the extent to which the working conditions and terms of employment of its employees are determined or influenced by collective bargaining agreements and on the extent to which its employees are represented in social dialogue in the European Economic Area (EEA) at the establishment and European level. |
59. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the coverage of collective bargaining agreements and social dialogue for the undertaking’s own employees . |
60. |
The undertaking shall disclose:
|
61. |
For employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements, the undertaking may disclose whether it determines their working conditions and terms of employment based on collective bargaining agreements that cover its other employees or based on collective bargaining agreements from other undertakings. |
62. |
The undertaking may disclose the extent to which the working conditions and terms of employment of non-employees in its own workforce are determined or influenced by collective bargaining agreements, including an estimate of the coverage rate. |
63. |
The undertaking shall disclose the following information in relation to
social dialogue
:
|
Disclosure Requirement S1-9 – Diversity metrics
64. |
The undertaking shall disclose the gender distribution at top management and the age distribution amongst its employees. |
65. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of gender diversity at top management level and the age distribution of its employees . |
66. |
The undertaking shall disclose:
|
Disclosure Requirement S1-10 – Adequate wages
67. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether or not its employees are paid an adequate wage, and if they are not all paid an adequate wage, the countries and percentage of employees concerned. |
68. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of whether or not all the undertaking’s employees are paid an adequate wage , in line with applicable benchmarks. |
69. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether all its employees are paid an adequate wage , in line with applicable benchmarks. If so, stating this will be sufficient to fulfil this disclosure requirement and no further information is needed. |
70. |
If not all its employees are paid an adequate wage in line with applicable benchmarks, the undertaking shall disclose the countries where employees earn below the applicable adequate wage benchmark and the percentage of employees that earn below the applicable adequate wage benchmark for each of these countries. |
71. |
The undertaking may also disclose the information specified in this disclosure requirement with regard to non-employees in its workforce. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-11 – Social protection
72. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether its employees are covered by social protection against loss of income due to major life events, and, if not, the countries where this is not the case. |
73. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of whether the undertaking’s employees are covered by social protection against loss of income due to major life events, and, if not, the countries where this is not the case. |
74. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether all its
employees
are covered by
social protection
, through public programs or through benefits offered by the undertaking, against loss of income due to any of the following major life events:
If so, stating this is sufficient to fulfil this disclosure requirement and no further information is needed. |
75. |
If not all of its employees are covered by social protection in accordance with paragraph 72, the undertaking shall in addition disclose the countries where employees do not have social protection with regard to one or more of the types of events listed in paragraph 72 and for each of those countries the types of employees who do not have social protection with regard to each applicable major life event. |
76. |
The undertaking may also disclose the information specified in this disclosure requirement with regard to non-employees in its workforce. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-12– Persons with disabilities
77. |
The undertaking shall disclose the percentage of its own employees with disabilities. |
78. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which persons with disabilities are included among the undertaking’s employees . |
79. |
The undertaking shall disclose the percentage of persons with disabilities amongst its employees subject to legal restrictions on the collection of data. |
80. |
The undertaking may disclose the percentage of employees with disabilities with a breakdown by gender. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-13 – Training and skills development metrics
81. |
The undertaking shall disclose the extent to which training and skills development is provided to its employees. |
82. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the training and skills development -related activities that have been offered to employees , within the context of continuous professional growth, to upgrade employees’ skills and facilitate continued employability. |
83. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 81 shall include:
|
84. |
The undertaking may disclose breakdowns by employee category for the percentage of employees that participated in regular performance and career development and for the average number of training hours per employee. |
85. |
The undertaking may also disclose the information specified in this disclosure requirement with regard to non-employees in its workforce. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-14 – Health and safety metrics
86. |
The undertaking shall disclose information on the extent to which its own workforce is covered by its health and safety management system and the number of incidents associated with work-related injuries, ill health and fatalities of its own workforce. In addition, it shall disclose the number of fatalities as a result of work-related injuries and work-related ill health of other workers working on the undertaking’s sites. |
87. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to allow an understanding of the coverage, quality and performance of the health and safety management system established to prevent work-related injuries . |
88. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 86 shall include the following information, where applicable broken down between
employees
and
non-employees
in the undertaking’s
own workforce
:
The information for (b) shall also be reported for other workers working on the undertaking’s sites , such as value chain workers if they are working on the undertaking’s sites. |
89. |
The undertaking may also disclose the information specified in points (d) and (e) of paragraph 88 with regard to non-employees . |
90. |
In addition, the undertaking may include the following additional information on the health and safety coverage: the percentage of its own workers covered by a health and safety management system which is based on legal requirements and/or recognised standards or guidelines and which has been internally audited and/or audited or certified by an external party. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-15 – Work-life balance metrics
91. |
The undertaking shall disclose the extent to which employees are entitled to and make use of family-related leave. |
92. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the entitlement and actual practices amongst the employees to take family-related leave in a gender equitable manner, as it is one of the dimensions of work-life balance . |
93. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 91 shall include:
|
94. |
If all of the undertaking’s employees are entitled to family-related leave through social policy and/or collective bargaining agreements, it is sufficient to disclose this in order to meet the requirement of paragraph 93a. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-16 – Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration)
95. |
The undertaking shall disclose the percentage gap in pay between its female and male employees and the ratio between the remuneration of its highest paid individual and the median remuneration for its employees. |
96. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is twofold: to allow an understanding of the extent of any gap in the pay between women and men amongst the undertaking’s employees ; and to provide insight into the level of remuneration inequality inside the undertaking and whether wide pay disparities exist. |
97. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 95 shall include:
|
98. |
The undertaking may disclose a breakdown of the gender pay gap as defined in paragraph 97(a) by employee category and/or by country/segment. The undertaking may also disclose the gender pay gap between employees by categories of employees broken down by ordinary basic salary and complementary or variable components. |
99. |
In relation to paragraph 97 (b), the undertaking may report this figure adjusted for purchasing power differences between countries, in which case it shall report the methodology used for the calculation. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-17 – Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts
100. |
The undertaking shall disclose the number of work-related incidents and/or complaints and severe human rights impacts within its own workforce, and any related material fines, sanctions or compensation for the reporting period. |
101. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to allow an understanding of the extent to which work-related incidents and severe cases of human rights impacts are affecting its own workforce . |
102. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 100 shall include, subject to the relevant privacy regulations, work-related incidents of discrimination on the grounds of gender, racial or ethnic origin, nationality, religion or belief, disability, age, sexual orientation, or other relevant forms of discrimination involving internal and/or external stakeholders across operations in the reporting period. This includes incidents of harassment as a specific form of discrimination. |
103. |
The undertaking shall disclose:
|
104. |
The undertaking shall disclose the following information regarding identified cases of severe human rights
incidents
(e.g.,
forced labour
, human trafficking or
child labour
):
|
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS S1 Own workforce. It supports the application of the disclosure requirements set out in this standard and has the same authority as the other parts of this Standard.
Objective
AR 1. |
In addition to the issues listed in paragraph 2, the undertaking may also consider disclosing information about other issues relevant to a material impact for a shorter period of time, for instance initiatives regarding the health and safety of its own workforce during a pandemic. |
AR 2. |
The overview of social matters provided in paragraph 2 is not meant to imply that all of these issues should be reported on in each Disclosure Requirement in this Standard. Rather, they provide a list of matters derived from the sustainability reporting requirements set out in Directive 2013/34/EU that the undertaking shall consider for the ESRS 2 materiality assessment related to its own workforce and, as appropriate, report as material impacts, risks and opportunities within the scope of this Standard. |
AR 3. |
Examples of people that fall within the scope of
“Own workforce
” are:
|
ESRS 2 General Disclosures
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
AR 4. |
ESRS 2 SBM-2 requires the undertaking to provide an understanding of whether and how it considers the role that its strategy and business model may play in creating, exacerbating or mitigating significant material impacts on its own workforce , and whether and how the business model and strategy are adapted to address such material impacts. |
AR 5. |
While the undertaking’s own workforce may not be engaging with the undertaking at the level of its strategy or business model , their views can inform the undertaking’s assessment of its strategy and business model. The undertaking shall consider the views of workers’ representatives when applicable to fulfil this disclosure. |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
AR 6. |
Impacts on the undertaking’s own workforce can originate in its strategy or business model in a number of different ways. For example, impacts may relate to the undertaking’s value proposition (such as providing lowest cost products or services, or high-speed delivery, in ways that put pressure on labour rights in its own operations), or its cost structure and the revenue model (such as shifting inventory risk to suppliers , with knock-on effects on the labour rights of people who work for them). |
AR 7. |
Impacts on the undertaking’s own workforce that originate in the strategy or business model can also bring material risks to the undertaking. For example, risks arise if some people in the workforce are at risk of forced labour , and the undertaking is importing products into countries where the law allows for the confiscation of imported goods that are suspected of being made with forced labour. An example of opportunities for the undertaking may result from providing opportunities for the workforce such as job creation and upskilling in the context of a “just transition”. Another example, in the context of a pandemic or other severe health crisis, relates to the undertaking potentially relying on contingent labour with little to no access to sick care and health benefits that may face severe operational and business continuity risks as workers have no choice but to keep working while sick, further exacerbating the spread of the disease and causing major supply chain breakdowns. Reputational and business opportunity risks linked to the exploitation of low-skilled, low-paid workers in sourcing geographies with minimal protections for them are also increasing with media backlash and consumer preferences moving to more ethically sourced or sustainable goods. |
AR 8. |
Examples of particular characteristics of people in the undertaking’s own workforce that may be considered by the undertaking when responding to paragraph 15 relate to young people that may be more susceptible to impacts on their physical and mental development, or women in a context where women are routinely discriminated against in the terms and conditions of work, or migrants in a context where the market for the supply of labour is poorly regulated and workers are routinely charged recruitment fees. For some people in the workforce, the inherent nature of the activity that they are required to undertake may put them at risk (for example, people required to handle chemicals or operate certain equipment or low paid employees who are on “zero hours” contracts). |
AR 9. |
With regard to paragraph 16, material risks could also arise because of the undertaking’s dependency on its own workforce where low-likelihood but high-impact events may trigger financial effects; for example, where a global pandemic leads to severe health impacts on the undertaking’s workforce resulting in major disruptions to production and distribution. Other examples of risk related to the undertaking’s dependency on its workforce include a shortage in skilled workers or political decisions or legislation affecting its own operations and own workforce . |
Impacts, risks and opportunities management
Disclosure Requirement S1-1 – Policies related to own workforce
AR 10. |
The undertaking shall consider whether explanations of significant changes to the policies adopted during the reporting year (for example, new expectations for foreign subsidiaries, new or additional approaches to due diligence and remedy) provide contextual information for users and may disclose such explanations. This includes policies and commitments of the undertaking to prevent or mitigate the risks and negative impacts on people in its own workforce of reducing carbon emissions and transitioning to greener and climate-neutral operations as well as to provide opportunities for the workforce such as job creation and upskilling, including explicit commitments to a ‘just transition’. |
AR 11. |
The policy may take the form of a stand-alone policy regarding the undertaking’s own workforce or be included in a broader document such as a code of ethics or a general sustainability policy that has already been disclosed by the undertaking as part of another ESRS. In those cases, the undertaking shall provide an accurate cross-reference to identify the aspects of the policy that satisfy the requirements of this Disclosure Requirement. |
AR 12. |
When disclosing the alignment of its policies with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the undertaking shall consider that the Guiding Principles refer to the International Bill of Human Rights, which consist of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the two Covenants that implement it, as well as the International Labour Organisation’s Declaration on Fundamental Rights and Principles at Work and the core conventions that underpin it, and may report on alignment with these instruments. |
AR 13. |
When explaining how external-facing policies are embedded, the undertaking may, for example, consider internal policies of responsible sourcing, and alignment with other policies relevant to own workers, for example, regarding forced labour. With regard to supplier codes of conduct that the undertaking may have, it shall indicate whether they include provisions addressing the safety of workers, precarious work (i.e., use of workers on short-term or limited hours contracts, workers employed via third parties, sub-contracting to third parties or use of informal workers), human trafficking, the use of forced labour or child labour, and whether such provisions are fully in line with applicable ILO standards. |
AR 14. |
The undertaking may provide an illustration of the types of communication of its policies to those individuals, group of individuals or entities for whom they are relevant, either because they are expected to implement them (for example, the undertaking’s employees , contractors and suppliers ), or because they have a direct interest in their implementation (for example, people in its own workforce , investors). It may disclose communication tools and channels (for example, flyers, newsletters, dedicated websites, social media, face to face interactions, workers’ representatives), aimed at ensuring that the policy is accessible and that different audiences understand its implications. The undertaking may also explain how it identifies and removes potential barriers for dissemination, such as through translation into relevant languages or the use of graphic depictions. |
AR 15. |
Discrimination in employment and occupation occurs when someone is treated differently or less favourably because of characteristics that are not related to merit or the inherent requirements of the job. These characteristics are commonly defined in national laws. Besides the grounds mentioned in the Disclosure Requirement, the undertaking shall consider other grounds for discrimination prohibited under national legislation. |
AR 16. |
Discrimination can arise in a variety of work-related activities. These include access to employment, particular occupations, training and vocational guidance and social security. Moreover, it can occur with respect to the terms and conditions of employment, such as: recruitment, remuneration, hours of work and rest, paid holidays, maternity protection, security of tenure, job assignments, performance assessment and advancement, training opportunities, promotion prospects, occupational safety and health, termination of employment. The undertaking may address these areas specifically when disclosing its policies and underlying procedures to fulfil the disclosure requirement. |
AR 17. |
The undertaking may disclose whether it:
|
Disclosure Requirement S1-2 – Processes for engaging with own workforce and workers' representatives about impacts
AR 18. |
When describing what function or role has operational responsibility for such engagement and/or ultimate accountability, the undertaking may disclose whether this is a dedicated role or function or part of a broader role or function, and whether any capacity building activities have been offered to support the staff to undertake engagement. If it cannot identify such a position or function, it may state that this is the case. This disclosure could also be fulfilled by making reference to information disclosed according to ESRS 2 GOV-1 The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies. |
AR 19. |
When preparing the disclosures described in paragraph 27 b) and c), the following illustrations may be considered:
|
AR 20. |
Global Framework Agreements (GFA) serve to establish an ongoing relationship between a multinational enterprise and a Global Union Federation to ensure that the undertaking adheres to the same standards in every country in which it operates. |
AR 21. |
To illustrate how the perspectives of its own workforce have informed specific decisions or activities, the undertaking may provide examples from the current reporting period. |
AR 22. |
Where the undertaking has agreements with national, European or international trade unions or works councils related to the rights of people its own workforce, this can be disclosed to illustrate how the agreement enables the undertaking to gain insight into the perspectives of such people. |
AR 23. |
Where possible, the undertaking may disclose examples from the reporting period to illustrate how the perspectives of its own workforce and workers' representatives have informed specific decisions or activities of the undertaking. |
AR 24. |
The undertaking shall consider the following aspects when fulfilling this Disclosure Requirement:
|
AR 25. |
The undertaking may also disclose the following information in relation to paragraph 24 on diversity:
|
AR 26. |
The undertaking may also report information about the effectiveness of processes for engaging with its own workforce from previous reporting periods. This applies in cases where the undertaking has assessed the effectiveness of these processes or derived lessons during the current reporting period. Processes used to track effectiveness can include internal or external auditing or verification, impact assessments, measurement systems, stakeholder feedback, grievance mechanisms , external performance ratings, and benchmarking. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workers to raise concerns
AR 27. |
In fulfilling the requirements set out by the disclosure criteria of Disclosure Requirement ESRS S1-3, the undertaking may be guided by the content of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct focused on remediation and grievance mechanisms . |
AR 28. |
Channels for raising concerns or needs include grievance mechanisms , hotlines, trade unions (where people in the workforce are unionised), works councils, dialogue processes or other means through which the undertaking’s own workforce or workers’ representatives can raise concerns about impacts or explain needs that they would like the undertaking to address. This could include both channels provided by the undertaking directly and channels provided by the entities where their own workforce is working, in addition to any other mechanisms an undertaking may use to gain insight into the management of impacts on its own workforce, such as compliance audits. Where the undertaking is relying solely on information about the existence of such channels provided by its business relationships to answer this requirement, it may state that. |
AR 29. |
Third party mechanisms could include those operated by the government, NGOs, industry associations and other collaborative initiatives. The undertaking may disclose whether these are accessible to all of its own workforce (or workers’ representatives or, in their absence, individuals or organisations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of negative impacts ). |
AR 30. |
The undertaking shall consider whether and how people in its own workforce that may be affected and their workers' representatives are able to access channels at the level of the undertaking they are employed by, or contracted to work for, in relation to each material impact. Relevant channels may include hotlines, trade unions (where people in the workforce are unionised) or works councils, or other grievance mechanisms operated by the relevant undertaking or by a third party. |
AR 31. |
In explaining whether and how the undertaking knows that people in its own workforce are aware of and trust any of these channels, the undertaking may provide relevant and reliable data about the effectiveness of these channels from the perspective of the people concerned. Examples of sources of information are surveys of people in the undertaking’s workforce that have used such channels and their levels of satisfaction with the process and outcomes. |
AR 32. |
In describing the effectiveness of channels for its
own workforce
and
workers’ representatives
to raise concerns, the undertaking may be guided by the following questions, based on the “effectiveness criteria for non-judicial
grievance mechanisms”
, as laid out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, in particular principle 31. The considerations below may be applied to individual channels or to a collective system of channels:
|
Disclosure Requirement S1-4 – Taking action on material impacts and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions and approaches
AR 33. |
It may take time to understand negative
impacts
and how the undertaking may be involved with them through its
own workforce
, as well as to identify appropriate responses and put them into practice). Therefore, the undertaking may disclose:
|
AR 34. |
Appropriate action can vary according to whether the undertaking causes or contributes to a material impact , or whether it is involved because the impact is directly linked to its operations, products or services by a business relationship. |
AR 35. |
Given that material negative impacts affecting its own workforce that have occurred during the reporting period may also be connected with other entities or operations outside its direct control, the undertaking may disclose whether and how it seeks to use its leverage in its business relationships to manage those impacts. This may include using commercial leverage (for example, enforcing contractual requirements with business relationships or implementing incentives), other forms of leverage within the relationship (such as providing training or capacity-building on workers’ rights to entities with which the undertaking has a business relationship) or collaborative leverage with peers or other actors (such as initiatives aimed at responsible recruitment or ensuring workers receive an adequate wage ). |
AR 36. |
When the undertaking discloses its participation in an industry or multi-stakeholder initiative as part of its actions to address material negative impacts, the undertaking may disclose how the initiative, and its own involvement, is aiming to address the material impact concerned. It may report under ESRS S1-5 the relevant targets set by the initiative and progress towards them. |
AR 37. |
When disclosing whether and how the undertaking considers actual and potential impacts on its own workforce in decisions to terminate business relationships and whether and how it seeks to address any negative impacts that may result from termination, the undertaking may include examples. |
AR 38. |
Processes used to track the effectiveness of actions can include internal or external auditing or verification, court proceedings and/or related court decisions, impact assessments, measurement systems, stakeholder feedback, grievance mechanisms , external performance ratings, and benchmarking. |
AR 39. |
Reporting on effectiveness is aimed at enabling the understanding of the links between actions taken by an undertaking and the effective management of impacts. Additional information that the undertaking may provide includes data showing a decrease in the number of incidents identified. |
AR 40. |
With regard to initiatives or processes whose primary aim is to deliver positive impacts for people in the undertaking’s
own workforce
that are based on their needs, and with regard to progress in the implementation of such initiatives or processes, the undertaking may disclose:
|
AR 41. |
The undertaking may explain whether any such initiatives are designed also to support the achievement of one or more Sustainable Development Goals. For example, an undertaking committing to SDG 8 to “promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all” may be actively working towards eliminating forced labour or compulsory labour or supporting higher levels of productivity on activities in developing countries through technological upgrades and training of local labour, which can benefit both the specific people in its own workforce targeted by the actions , and also their local communities. |
AR 42. |
When disclosing the intended or achieved positive outcomes of its actions for the undertaking’s own workforce, a distinction is to be made between evidence of certain activities having occurred (for example, that x number of people have received financial literacy training ) from evidence of actual outcomes for the people concerned (for example, that x people report that they are able to better manage their pay and their household budgets). |
AR 43. |
If the undertaking has taken measures to mitigate negative impacts on its own workforce that arise from the transition to a greener, climate-neutral economy, such as training and reskilling, employment guarantees, and in the case of downscaling or mass dismissal, measures such as job counselling, coaching, intra-company placements and early retirement plans, the undertaking shall disclose those measures. This includes measures to comply with prevailing regulation. The undertaking may highlight present and/or expected external developments that influence whether dependencies turn into risks . This includes consideration of impacts that may arise from the transition to greener and climate-neutral operations. |
AR 44. |
When disclosing the material
risks
and
opportunities
related to its
impacts
or
dependencies
on its
own workforce
, the undertaking may consider the following:
|
AR 45. |
When explaining whether dependencies turn into risks , the undertaking shall consider external developments. |
AR 46. |
When disclosing policies , actions and resources and targets related to the management of material risks and opportunities , in cases where risks and opportunities arise from a material impact , the undertaking may cross-reference its disclosures on policies, actions and resources and targets in relation to that impact. |
AR 47. |
The undertaking shall consider whether and how its process(es) to manage material risks related to own workforce are integrated into its existing risk management process(es). |
AR 48. |
When disclosing the resources allocated to the management of material impacts, the undertaking may explain which internal functions are involved in managing the impacts and what types of action they take to address negative and advance positive impacts. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement S1-5 – Targets related to managing material impacts, advancing positive impacts, as well as to risks and opportunities
AR 49. |
When disclosing information about
targets
in accordance with paragraph 46, the undertaking may disclose:
|
AR 50. |
Targets related to risks and opportunities may be the same as or distinct from targets related to impacts . For example, a target to reach adequate wage s for non-employees could both reduce impacts on those people and reduce associated risks in terms of the quality and reliability of their output. |
AR 51. |
The undertaking may also distinguish between short-, medium- and long-term targets covering the same policy commitment. For example, the undertaking may have a long-term target to achieve an 80% reduction in health and safety incidents affecting its delivery drivers by 2030 and a near-term target to reduce the overtime hours of delivery drivers by x% while maintaining their income by 2024. |
AR 52. |
When modifying or replacing a target in the reporting period, the undertaking may explain the change by cross-referencing it to significant changes in the business model or to broader changes in the accepted standard or legislation from which the target is derived to provide contextual information as per ESRS 2 BP-2 Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-6 – Characteristics of the Undertaking’s Employees
AR 53. |
This Disclosure Requirement covers all employees who perform work for any of the undertaking’s entities included in its sustainability reporting. |
AR 54. |
Providing a breakdown of employees by country gives insight into the distribution of activity across countries. The number of employees in each country is also a key trigger for many information, consultation and participation rights for workers and workers' representatives, both in the Union labour law acquis (for example, Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (108)“European Works Councils Directive” and Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (109)“Information and Consultation Directive”) and in national law (for example, rights to establish a works council or to have board level employee representation). Providing a breakdown of employees by gender and type of employment relationship gives insight into gender representation across the undertaking. Additionally, providing a breakdown of employees by region gives insight into regional variations. A region can refer to a country or other geographic locations, such as a region within a country or a world region. |
AR 55. |
The undertaking shall disclose the requested disclosures in the following tabular formats:
Table 1 Template for presenting information on employee head count by gender
In some Member States it is possible for persons to legally register themselves as having a third, often neutral, gender, which is categorised as “other” in the table above. However, if the undertaking is disclosing data about employees where this is not possible, it may explain this and indicate that the “other” category is not applicable. Table 2 Template for presenting employee head count in countries where the undertaking has at least 50 employees representing at least 10% of its total number of employees.
Table 3 Template for presenting information on employees by contract type, broken down by gender (head count or FTE) (reporting on full-time and part-time employees is voluntary)
Table 4 Template for presenting information on employees by contract type, broken down by region (head count or FTE) (reporting on full-time and part-time employees is voluntary)
|
AR 56. |
The definitions of permanent, temporary, non-guaranteed hours, full-time, and part-time employees differ between countries. If the undertaking has employees in more than one country, it shall use the definitions as per the national laws of the countries where the employees are based to calculate country-level data. The country-level data shall then be added up to calculate total numbers, disregarding differences in national legal definitions. Non-guaranteed hours employees are employed by the undertaking without a guarantee of a minimum or fixed number of working hours. The employee may need to make themselves available for work as required, but the undertaking is not contractually obliged to offer the employee a minimum or fixed number of working hours per day, week, or month. Casual employees, employees with zero-hour contracts, and on-call employees are examples that fall under this category. |
AR 57. |
Disclosing the number of employees at the end of the reporting period provides information for that point in time, without capturing fluctuations during the reporting period. Disclosing these numbers in averages across the reporting period takes into account fluctuations during the reporting period. |
AR 58. |
Quantitative data, such as the number of temporary or part-time employees , is unlikely to be sufficient on its own. For example, a high proportion of temporary or part-time employees could indicate a lack of employment security for employees, but it could equally signal workplace flexibility when offered as a voluntary choice. For this reason, the undertaking is required to disclose contextual information to help information users interpret the data. The undertaking can explain the reasons for temporary employment. An example of such a reason is the recruitment of employees to undertake work on a temporary or seasonal project or event. Another example is the standard practice of offering a temporary contract (for example, six months) to new employees before an offer of permanent employment is made. The undertaking may also explain the reasons for non-guaranteed hours employment. |
AR 59. |
For the own employee turnover calculation, the undertaking shall calculate the aggregate of the number of employees who leave voluntarily or due to dismissal, retirement, or death in service. The undertaking shall use this number for the numerator of the employee turnover rate and may determine the denominator used to calculate this rate and describe its methodology. |
AR 60. |
Where data is not available for detailed information, the undertaking shall use an estimation of the employee number or ratios, in accordance with ESRS 1, and clearly identify where the use of estimates has taken place. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-7 – Characteristics of non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce
AR 61. |
This Disclosure Requirement provides insight into the undertaking’s approach to employment, as well as the scope and nature of impacts arising from its employment practices. It also provides contextual information that aids an understanding of the information reported in other disclosures. This disclosure covers both individual contractors supplying labour to the undertaking (“self-employed people”) and workers provided by undertakings primarily engaged in “employment activities” (NACE Code N78). If all the people performing work for the undertaking are employees and the undertaking does not have any people in its workforce who are not employees, this Disclosure Requirement is not material for the undertaking; notwithstanding, the undertaking may state this fact when disclosing the information required by Disclosure Requirement S1-6 as contextual information as this information can be relevant for the users of the Sustainability Statement . |
AR 62. |
Examples of contractors (self-employed people) in the undertaking’s own workforce include: contractors hired by the undertaking to perform work that would otherwise be carried out by an employee; contractors hired by the undertaking to perform work in a public area (for example, on a road, on the street); and contractors hired by the undertaking to deliver the work/service directly at the workplace of a client of the organization. Examples of people employed by a third party engaged in ‘employment activities’ whose work is under the direction of the undertaking include: people who perform the same work that employees carry out, such as people who fill in for employees who are temporarily absent (due to illness, holiday, parental leave, etc.); people performing regular work at the same site as employees; and workers who are dispatched temporarily from another EU member state to work for the undertaking (‘posted workers’). Examples of value chain workers (and thus of workers not in the undertaking’s own workforce and reported under the scope of ESRS S2) include: workers for a supplier contracted by the undertaking who work on the supplier’s premises using the supplier’s work methods; workers for a ‘downstream’ entity which purchases goods or services from the undertaking; and workers of an equipment supplier to the undertaking who, at one or more of the undertaking’s workplaces, perform regular maintenance on the supplier’s equipment (for example, photocopier) as stipulated in the contract between the equipment supplier and the undertaking. |
AR 63. |
If the undertaking cannot report exact figures, it shall use estimates according to the provisions in ESRS 1 to disclose the number of people in its own workforce who are not employees to the nearest ten or, where the number of people in its own workforce who are not employees is greater than 1 000, to the nearest 100, and explain this. In addition, it shall clearly identify the information that derives from actual data and estimates. |
AR 64. |
Disclosing the number of people in the undertaking’s own workforce who are not employees at the end of the reporting period provides information for that point in time without capturing fluctuations during the reporting period. Disclosing this number as an average across the reporting period considers fluctuations during the reporting period and can provide more insightful and relevant information for users . |
AR 65. |
The information disclosed by the undertaking allows users to understand how the number of non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce varies during the reporting period or compared to the previous reporting period (i.e., whether the numbers have increased or decreased). The undertaking may also disclose the reasons for the fluctuations. For example, an increase in the number of non-employees during the reporting period could be due to a seasonal event. Conversely, a decrease in the number of non-employees compared to the previous reporting period could be due to the completion of a temporary project. If the undertaking discloses fluctuations, it shall also explain the criteria used to determine which fluctuations it discloses. If there are no significant fluctuations in the number of non-employees during the reporting period or between the current and previous reporting period, the undertaking may disclose this information. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-8 – Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue
Collective bargaining coverage
AR 66. |
The percentage of
employees
covered by
collective bargaining
agreements is calculated using the following formula:
|
AR 67. |
The employees in the undertaking’s own workforce covered by collective bargaining agreements are those individuals to whom the undertaking is obliged to apply the agreement. This means that if none of the employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, the percentage reported is zero. An employee in the undertaking’s own workforce covered by more than one collective bargaining agreement only needs to be counted once. |
AR 68. |
This requirement is not aimed at obtaining the percentage of employees represented by a works council or belonging to trade unions, which can be different. The percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements can be higher than the percentage of unionised employees when the collective bargaining agreements apply to both union and non-union members. Alternatively, the percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements can be lower than the percentage of unionised employees. This may be the case when there are no collective bargaining agreements available or when the collective bargaining agreements do not cover all unionised employees. |
Social Dialogue
AR 69. |
For calculating the information required by paragraph 63(a), the undertaking shall identify in which European Economic Area (EEA) countries it has significant employment (i.e., at least 50 employees representing at least 10% of its total employees). For these countries it shall report the percentage of
employees
in that country which are employed in establishments in which employees are represented by
workers’ representatives
. Establishment is defined as any place of operations where the undertaking carries out a non-transitory economic activity with human means and goods. Examples include: a factory, a branch of a retail chain, or an undertaking’s headquarters. For countries in which there is only one establishment the percentage reported shall be either 100% or 0%.
|
AR 70. |
The information required by this Disclosure Requirement shall be reported as follows
Table 1 Reporting template for collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue
|
Disclosure Requirement S1-9 – Diversity metrics
AR 71. |
In preparing the disclosure on gender at top management, the undertaking shall use the definition of top management as one and two levels below the administrative and supervisory bodies unless this concept has already been defined with the undertaking’s operations and differs from the previous description. If this is the case, the undertaking can use its own definition for top management and disclose that fact and its own definition. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-10 – Adequate Wages
AR 72. |
The lowest wage shall be calculated for the lowest pay category, excluding interns and apprentices. This is to be based on the basic wage plus any fixed additional payments that are guaranteed to all employees . The lowest wage shall be considered separately for each country in which the undertaking has operations, except outside the EEA when the relevant adequate or minimum wage is defined at a sub national level. |
AR 73. |
The
adequate wage
benchmark used for comparison with the lowest wage shall not be lower than:
|
AR 74. |
Directive (EU) 2022/2041 on adequate minimum wages in the European Union references both indicative reference values commonly used at international level such as 60 % of the gross median wage and 50 % of the gross average wage, and/or indicative reference values used at national level. Data for the indicative values of 60% of the national median gross wage or 50% of the national average gross wage can be obtained from the European Labour Force Survey. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-11 – Social protection
AR 75. |
Social protection refers to all the measures that provide access to health care and income support in cases of challenging life events such as the loss of a job, being sick and in need of medical care, giving birth and raising a child, or retiring and in need of a pension. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-12 – Persons with disabilities
AR 76. |
When disclosing the information required in paragraph 77 regarding persons with disabilities , the undertaking shall provide any contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled (methodology). For example, information about the impact of different legal definitions of persons with disabilities in the different countries in which the undertaking has operations. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-13 – Training and Skills Development metrics
AR 77. |
A regular performance review is defined as a review based on criteria known to the employee and his or her superior undertaken with the knowledge of the employee at least once per year. The review can include an evaluation by the worker’s direct superior, peers, or a wider range of
employees
. The review can also involve the human resources department. In order to disclose the information required by paragraph 83 (a), the undertaking shall use the employee headcount figures provided in Disclosure Requirement ESRS S1-6 in the denominator to calculate the:
|
AR 78. |
To disclose the average required per paragraph 83 (b), the undertaking shall perform the following calculation: total number of training hours offered to and completed by employees per gender category divided by the total number of employees per gender category. For the total training average and the average by gender, the head count figures for total employment and employment by gender reported in Disclosure Requirement ESRS S1-6 shall be used. |
AR 79. |
Employee categories are a breakdown of employees by level (such as senior management, middle management) or function (such as technical, administrative, production). This information is derived from the undertaking’s own human resources system. In categorising the workforce, the undertaking shall define reasonable and meaningful employee categories which enable users of the information to understand different performance measures between the categories. The undertaking may present a category for executive and non- executive employees. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-14 – Health and safety metrics
AR 80. |
In relation to paragraph 88 (a), the percentage of its own workforce who are covered by the undertaking’s health and safety management system shall be disclosed on a head count basis rather than a full-time equivalent basis. |
AR 81. |
With regard to paragraph 90, when the undertaking’s health and safety management system, or certain parts thereof, has been subject to an internal audit or external certification, the undertaking may state this fact, or absence thereof, and the underlying standards for such audits/certifications, as applicable. |
AR 82. |
Fatalities may be reported separately for those resulting from work-related injuries and those resulting from work-related ill health . |
Guidance on “work-related”
AR 83. |
Work-related injuries
and
work-related ill health
arise from exposure to hazards at work. Notwithstanding, other types of
incidents
can occur that are not connected with the work itself. For example, the following incidents are generally not considered to be work-related, unless otherwise specified in applicable national legislation:
|
AR 84. |
With regard to travelling for work purposes, injuries and ill health that occur while a person is travelling are work-related if, at the time of the injury or ill health, the person was engaged in work activities “in the interest of the employer”. Examples of such activities include travelling to and from customer contacts; conducting job tasks; and entertaining or being entertained to transact, discuss, or promote business (at the direction of the employer). If the undertaking is responsible for the transport commuting, incidents occurred while commuting are considered to be work-related. Nonetheless, incidents which arise during travel, outside of the undertaking’s responsibility (i.e., regular commuting to and from work), may be reported separately provided that the undertaking has such data available across the undertaking. |
AR 85. |
With regard to working from home, injuries and ill health that occur when working from home are work-related, if the injury or ill health occurs while the person is performing work from home; and the injury or ill health is directly related to the performance of work rather than the general home environment or setting. |
AR 86. |
With regard to mental illness, it is considered to be work-related, if it has been notified voluntarily by the person concerned and it is supported by an opinion from a licensed healthcare professional with appropriate training and experience; and if such opinion states that the illness is work-related. |
AR 87. |
Health issues resulting, for example, from smoking, drug and alcohol abuse, physical inactivity, unhealthy diets, and psychosocial factors unrelated to work are not considered work-related. |
AR 88. |
Occupational diseases are not considered work-related injuries but are covered under work-related ill health. |
Guidance on computing the rate of work-related injuries
AR 89. |
In computing the rate of work-related injuries, the undertaking shall divide the respective number of cases by the number of total hours worked by people in its own workforce and multiplied by 1 000 000. Thereby, these rates represent the number of respective cases per one million hours worked. A rate based on 1 000 000 hours worked indicates the number of work-related injuries per 500 full time people in the workforce over a 1-year timeframe. For comparability purposes a rate based on 1 000 000 hours worked shall be used also for undertakings with less than 500 people in the workforce. |
AR 90. |
If the undertaking cannot directly calculate the number of hours worked, it may estimate this on the basis of normal or standard hours of work, taking into account entitlements to periods of paid leave of absence from work (for example, paid vacations, paid sick leave, public holidays) and explain this in its disclosures. |
AR 91. |
An undertaking shall include fatalities as a result of work-related injury in the calculation of the number and rate of recordable work-related injuries. |
Guidance on recordable work-related ill health
AR 92. |
Work-related ill health can include acute, recurring, and chronic health problems caused or aggravated by work conditions or practices. These include musculoskeletal disorders, skin and respiratory diseases, malignant cancers, diseases caused by physical agents (for example, noise-induced hearing loss, vibration-caused diseases), and mental illnesses (for example, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder). For the purpose of the required disclosures, the undertaking shall, at a minimum, include in its disclosure those cases outlined in the ILO List of Occupational Diseases. |
AR 93. |
In the context of this Standard, work-related musculoskeletal disorders are covered under work-related ill health (and not injuries). |
AR 94. |
The cases to be disclosed in paragraph 88(d) relate to cases of work-related ill health notified to the undertaking or identified by the undertaking through medical surveillance, during the reporting period. The undertaking might be notified of cases of work-related ill health through reports by affected people, compensation agencies, or healthcare professionals. The disclosure may include cases of work-related ill health that were detected during the reporting period among people who were formerly in the undertaking’s workforce. |
Guidance on the number of days lost
AR 95. |
The undertaking shall count the number of days lost such that the first full day and last day of absence shall be included. Calendar days should be considered for the calculation, thus days on which the affected individual is not scheduled for work (for example, weekends, public holidays) will count as lost days. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-15 – Work-life balance
AR 96. |
Family-related leave include maternity leave, paternity leave, parental leave, and carers’ leave that is available under national law or collective agreements. For the purpose of this Standard, these concepts are defined as:
|
AR 97. |
With regard to paragraph 93 (a), employees entitled to family-related leave are those who are covered by regulations, organisational policies, agreements, contracts or collective bargaining agreements that contain family-related leave entitlements and have reported their entitlement to the undertaking or the undertaking is aware of the entitlement. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-16 – Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration)
Pay gap
AR 98. |
When compiling the information required under paragraph 97 (a) for the gap in
pay
between its female and male employees (also known as the “gender pay gap”) the undertaking shall use the following methodology:
|
AR 99. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraph 97 (a), the undertaking shall provide any contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled (methodology). Information regarding how objective factors such as type of work and country of employment influence the gender pay gap may be reported. |
AR 100. |
The measure of the undertaking’s gender pay gap shall be reported for the current reporting period and, if reported in previous sustainability reports, for the previous two reporting periods. |
Total remuneration Ratio
AR 101. |
When compiling the information required by paragraph 97 (b), the undertaking shall:
|
AR 102. |
To illustrate the contextual information, the undertaking may provide an explanation to understand the data and how the data has been compiled (methodology). Quantitative data, such as the annual total remuneration ratio, may not be sufficient on its own to understand pay disparity and its drivers. For example, pay ratios can be influenced by the size of the undertaking (for example, revenue, number of employees ), its sector, its employment strategy (for example, reliance on outsourced workers or part-time employees, a high degree of automation), or currency volatility. |
Disclosure Requirement S1-17 –Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts
AR 103. |
In addition to the information required by paragraphs 103 and 104, the undertaking may disclose the status of
incidents
and/or complaints and actions taken with reference to the following:
|
AR 104. |
If the undertaking compiles the information described in AR 105, it shall consider the following:
|
AR 105. |
Severe human rights incidents include instances of lawsuits, formal complaints through the undertaking or third-party complaint mechanisms, serious allegations in public reports or the media, where these are connected to the undertaking’s own workforce , and the fact of the incidents is not disputed by the undertaking, as well as any other severe impacts of which the undertaking is aware. |
AR 106. |
In addition to the information required by paragraph 104 above, the undertaking may disclose the number of severe human rights incidents where the undertaking played a role securing remedy for those affected during the reporting period. |
Appendix A.1
Application Requirements for ESRS 2 related disclosures
This appendix is an integral part of ESRS S1 Own workforce. It supports the application of the disclosure requirements from ESRS 2 set out in this standard and has the same authority as the other parts of this Standard. It provides a non-exhaustive list of the factors to be considered by the undertaking when complying with ESRS 2 SBM-2 and ESRS 2 SBM-3. This appendix does not provide definitions of the terms mentioned below. All defined terms can be found in Annex II: Acronyms and Glossary of Terms.
Social and human rights matters |
Non-exhaustive list of factors to consider in Materiality Assessment |
Secure employment |
% of employees with temporary contracts, ratio of non-employees to employees, social protection |
Working time |
% of employees with part time or zero-hour contracts, employee satisfaction with working time |
Adequate wages |
EU, national or local legal definitions of adequate wages, fair wages, and minimum wages |
Social dialogue / existence of work councils / information, consultation and participation rights of workers |
Extent of workplace, cross-border and board-level representation through trade unions and/or works councils |
Freedom of association/Collective bargaining including the rate of workforce covered by collective agreements |
% of own workforce covered by collective bargaining agreements, work stoppages |
Work-life balance |
Family-related leave, flexible working hours, access to childcare |
Health and safety |
Coverage by H&S system, rate of fatalities, non-fatal accidents, work-related ill health, work days lost |
Gender equality and equal pay for work of equal value |
% of women in top management and workforce, male-female wage gap |
Training and skills development |
Amount and distribution of training, % of employees with regular performance and development reviews |
The employment and inclusion of people with disabilities |
% employment and accessibility measures for employees with disabilities |
Measures against violence and harassment in the workplace |
Prevalence of violence and harassment |
Diversity |
Representation of women and /or ethnic groups or minorities in own workforce. Age distribution in own workforce. Percentage of persons with disabilities within the own workforce. |
Child labour |
Type of operations and geographical areas at risk of child labour |
Forced labour |
Type of operations and geographical areas at risk of forced labour |
Appendix A.2
Application Requirements for ESRS S1-1 Policies related to own workforce
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS S1 Own workforce and has the same authority as the other parts of this Standard. It supports the application of the requirements for Disclosure Requirement ESRS S1-1 for social and human rights matters with examples of disclosures.
Social and human rights matters |
Examples of policies: |
Secure employment |
No-layoff policy, limits on renewing temporary contracts, employer provision of social protection where state provision is lacking |
Working time |
Limitations on overtime, long and split shifts, and night and weekend work, adequate scheduling of lead times |
Adequate wages |
Policy to ensure all people in own workforce receive an adequate wage |
Social dialogue / existence of work councils / information, consultation and participation rights of workers |
Policy to encourage institutions for social dialogue, regular information and consultation with worker representatives, consultation before final decisions on employment-related issues are reached |
Freedom of association/Collective bargaining including the rate of workers covered by collective agreements |
Non-interference in trade union formation and recruitment (including trade union access to undertakings), bargaining in good faith, adequate time off for workers’ representatives to carry out their duties, facilities and dismissal protection for workers' representatives, no discrimination of trade union members and workers' representatives |
Work-life balance |
Provision of family leave, flexible working time, access to day care facilities for all employees |
Health and safety |
Coverage of all own workforce in H&S management system |
Gender equality and equal work for equal pay |
Policy for gender equality and equal pay for equal work |
Training and skills development |
Policy for enhancing skills and career prospects for employees |
The employment and inclusion of people with disabilities |
Policy for making workplaces accessible to persons with disabilities |
Measures against violence and harassment in the workplace |
Zero tolerance policy for violence and harassment at workplace |
Diversity |
Policy for inclusiveness (i.e., ethnic diversity or minority groups) and positive action. |
Child labour |
Policy for identifying where child labour occurs, identifying where exposure of young workers to hazardous work occurs and preventing risk of exposure |
Forced labour |
Policy for identifying where forced labour occurs and reducing risk of forced labour |
Appendix A.3
Application Requirements for ESRS S1–4 Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS S1 Own workforce and has the same authority as the other parts of this Standard. It supports the application of the requirements for Disclosure Requirement ESRS S1-4 for social and human rights matters with examples of disclosures:
Social and human rights matters |
Examples of actions: |
Secure employment |
Offer permanent contracts to employees with temporary contracts, implement plans for social protection where state provision is lacking |
Working time |
Shift work rotation, extend advance notice of scheduling, reduction of excessive overtime |
Adequate wages |
Negotiation of fair wages in collective bargaining agreements, verification that employment agencies pay a fair wage |
Social dialogue / existence of work councils / information, consultation and participation rights of workers |
Expansion of sustainability issues dealt with in social dialogue, increase in number of meetings, increase in resources for works councils |
Freedom of association/Collective bargaining including the rate of workers covered by collective agreements |
Expansion of sustainability issues dealt with in collective bargaining, increase in resources for workers’ representatives |
Work-life balance |
Expand family leave eligibility and flexible working time arrangements, increasing provision of day care |
Health and safety |
Increase health & safety training, investment in safer equipment |
Gender equality and equal work for equal pay |
Targeted recruitment and promotion of women, reduction in pay gap through negotiation of collective bargaining agreements |
Training and skills development |
Skills audits, training to fill skills gaps |
The employment and inclusion of people with disabilities |
Increasing accessibility measures |
Measures against violence and harassment in the workplace |
Improving complaint mechanisms, increasing sanctions against violence and harassment, providing training for prevention to management |
Diversity |
Training on diversity and inclusion (including ethnicity considerations), targeted recruitment of underrepresented groups |
Child labour |
Age verification measures, partnerships with organizations to eliminate child labour, measures against worst forms of child labour |
Forced labour |
Measures ensuring free consent to employment without threat of penalty, contracts in understandable language, freedom to terminate employment without penalty, disciplinary measures should not obligate labour, free consent to overtime, freedom of movement (including to exit workplace), fair treatment for migrant workers, monitoring employment agencies. |
Appendix A.4
Application Requirements for ESRS S1–5 Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS S1 Own workforce and has the same authority as the other parts of this Standard. It supports the application of the requirements for Disclosure Requirement ESRS S1-5 for social and human rights matters with examples of disclosures:
Social and human rights matters |
Examples of targets: |
Secure employment |
Increasing the % of workforce with employment contracts (especially permanent contracts) and social protection |
Working time |
Increasing the % of workforce with flexible working time arrangements |
Adequate wages |
Ensuring that all people in own workforce receive an adequate wage |
Social dialogue / existence of work councils / information, consultation and participation rights of workers |
Extending social dialogue to more establishments and/or countries |
Freedom of association/Collective bargaining including the rate of workers covered by collective agreements |
Increasing the % of own workforce covered by collective bargaining, negotiating collective bargaining agreements over sustainability issues |
Work-life balance |
Extending work-life measures to a greater % of own workforce |
Health and safety |
Reducing the rate of injuries and worktime lost due to injuries |
Gender equality and equal work for equal pay |
Increasing the % of women in the workforce and top management, reducing the male-female wage gap |
Training and skills development |
Increasing the % of employees receiving training and regular skills development reviews |
The employment and inclusion of people with disabilities |
Increasing the % of persons with disabilities in own workforce |
Measures against violence and harassment in the workplace |
Extending measures to all workplaces |
Diversity |
Increasing the % of underrepresented groups in own workforce and top management |
Child labour |
Extending measures for preventing exposure of young persons to hazardous work to a greater % of operations |
Forced labour |
Extending measures for preventing forced labour to a greater number of operations |
ESRS S2
WORKERS IN THE VALUE CHAIN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
Interaction with other ESRS
Disclosure Requirements
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Strategy
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 Interests and views of stakeholde |
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement S2-1 – Policies related to value chain workers |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S2-2 – Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S2-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S2-4 – Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those action |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement S2-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
– |
Objective |
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Strategy
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 - Interests and views of stakeholders |
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement S2-1 – Policies related to value chain workers |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S2-2 – Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S2-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S2-4 – Taking Action on material impacts, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions and approaches |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement S2-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities |
Objective
1. |
The objective of this Standard is to specify disclosure requirements which will enable
users
of the
sustainability statement
to understand material
impacts
on
value chain
workers
connected with the undertaking’s own operations and value chain, including through its products or services, as well as through its business relationships, and its related material risks and opportunities, including:
|
2. |
In order to meet the objective, this Standard requires an explanation of the general approach the undertaking takes to identify and manage any material actual and potential
impacts
on
value chain
workers in relation to:
|
3. |
This Standard also requires an explanation of how such impacts, as well as the undertaking’s dependencies on value chain workers , can create material risks or opportunities for the undertaking. For example, negative impacts on value chain workers may disrupt the undertaking’s operations (through customers refusing to buy its products or state agencies impounding its goods) and harm its reputation. Conversely, respect for workers’ rights and active support programmes (for example through financial literacy initiatives) can bring business opportunities, such as more reliable supply or widening of the future consumer base. |
4. |
This Standard covers all workers in the undertaking’s upstream and downstream value chain who are or can be materially impacted by the undertaking, including impacts that are connected with the undertaking’s own operations and value chain, including through its products or services, as well as through its business relationships. This includes all workers who are not included in the scope of “own workforce ” (“own workforce” includes employees , individual contractors, i.e., self- employed workers, and workers provided by third party undertakings primarily engaged in ‘employment activities’). Own workforce is covered in ESRS S1 Own workforce. See AR 3 for examples of what is included in the scope of this Standard. |
Interaction with other ESRS
5. |
This Standard applies when material impacts on and/or material risks and opportunities related to value chain workers have been identified through the materiality assessment process laid out in ESRS 2 General disclosures. |
6. |
This Standard shall be read in conjunction with ESRS 1 General requirements, and ESRS 2, as well as the ESRS S1, ESRS S3 Affected communities and ESRS S4 Consumers and end-users. |
7. |
The reporting under this Standard shall be consistent, coherent and where relevant clearly linked with reporting on the undertaking’s own workforce under ESRS S1, in order to ensure effective reporting. |
Disclosure Requirements
ESRS 2 General disclosures
8. |
The requirements of this section should be read in conjunction with the disclosures required by ESRS 2 on Strategy (SBM). The resulting disclosures shall be presented alongside the disclosures required by ESRS 2, except for SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model, for which the undertaking has an option to present the disclosures alongside the topical disclosure. |
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 Interests and views of stakeholders
9. |
When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-2 paragraph 43, the undertaking shall disclose how the interests, views, and rights of its value chain workers could be materially impacted by the undertaking, including respect for their human rights, inform its strategy and business model. Value chain workers are a key group of affected stakeholders . |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
10. |
When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose:
|
11. |
When fulfilling the requirements of paragraph ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose whether all
value chain workers
who are likely to be materially impacted by the undertaking, including impacts that are connected with the undertaking’s own operations and value chain, including through its products or services , as well as through its business relationships, are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2. In addition, the undertaking shall provide the following information:
|
12. |
In describing the main types of value chain workers who are or could be negatively affected, based on the materiality assessment set out in ESRS 2 IRO-1, the undertaking shall disclose whether and how it has developed an understanding of how workers with particular characteristics, those working in particular contexts, or those undertaking particular activities may be at greater risk of harm. |
13. |
The undertaking shall disclose which, if any, of its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on its value chain workers relate to specific groups of value chain workers (for example, particular age groups, workers in a particular factory or country) rather than to all of the value chain workers. |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement S2-1 – Policies related to value chain workers
14. |
The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts on value chain workers, as well as associated material risks and opportunities. |
15. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of material impacts on value chain workers specifically, as well as policies that cover material risks or opportunities related to value chain workers. |
16. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 14 shall contain the information on the undertaking’s policies to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to value chain workers in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. In addition, the undertaking shall specify whether such policies cover specific groups of value chain workers or all value chain workers. |
17. |
The undertaking shall describe its human rights
policy
commitments (112) that are relevant to
value chain workers
, including those processes and mechanisms to monitor compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (113). In its disclosure, it shall focus on those matters that are material in relation to, as well as the general approach to:
|
18. |
The undertaking shall state whether its policies in relation to value chain workers explicitly address trafficking in human beings (114), forced labour or compulsory labour and child labour. It shall also state whether the undertaking has a supplier code of conduct (115). |
19. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how its policies with regard to value chain workers are aligned with internationally recognised instruments relevant to value chain workers, including the United Nations (UN) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (116). The undertaking shall also disclose the extent to which cases of non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises that involve value chain workers have been reported in its upstream and downstream value chain and, if applicable, an indication of the nature of such cases (117). |
Disclosure Requirement S2-2 – Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts
20. |
The undertaking shall disclose its general processes for engaging with value chain workers and their representatives about actual and potential impacts on them. |
21. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of whether and how the undertaking engages, as part of its ongoing due diligence process, with value chain workers and their legitimate representatives, or with credible proxies , about material actual and potential positive and/or negative impacts that do or are likely to affect them, and whether and how perspectives of value chain workers are taken into account in the decision-making processes of the undertaking. |
22. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how the perspectives of
value chain workers
inform its decisions or activities aimed at managing the actual and potential impacts on value chain workers. This shall include, where relevant, an explanation of:
|
23. |
Where applicable, the undertaking shall disclose the steps it takes to gain insight into the perspectives of workers that may be particularly vulnerable to impacts and/or marginalised (for example, women workers, migrant workers, workers with disabilities). |
24. |
If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a general process to engage with workers in the value chain, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a process in place. |
Disclosure Requirement S2-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns
25. |
The undertaking shall describe the processes it has in place to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of negative impacts on value chain workers that the undertaking is connected with, as well as channels available to value chain workers to raise concerns and have them addressed. |
26. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the formal means by which value chain workers can make their concerns and needs known directly to the undertaking and/or through which the undertaking supports the availability of such channels (for example, grievance mechanisms ) in the workplace of value chain workers, how follow up is carried out with these workers regarding the issues raised, and the effectiveness of these channels. |
27. |
The undertaking shall describe:
|
28. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it assesses that value chain workers are aware of and trust these structures or processes as a way to raise their concerns or needs and have them addressed. In addition, the undertaking shall disclose whether it has policies in place regarding the protection of individuals that use them against retaliation. If such information has been disclosed in accordance with ESRS G1-1, the undertaking may refer to that information. |
29. |
If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a channel for raising concerns and/or does not support the availability of such a channel in the workplace of value chain workers, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a channel or processes in place. |
Disclosure Requirement S2-4 – Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions
30. |
The undertaking shall disclose how it takes action to address material impacts on value chain workers, and to manage material risks and pursue material opportunities related to value chain workers and the effectiveness of those actions. |
31. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is twofold. Firstly, it is to enable an understanding of any actions or initiatives through which the undertaking seeks to:
Secondly, it is to enable an understanding of the ways in which the undertaking is addressing the material risks and pursuing the material opportunities related to workers in the value chain . The undertaking shall provide a summarised description of the action plans and resources to manage its material impacts, risks, and opportunities related to value chain workers as per ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters. |
32. |
In relation to material
impacts
, the undertaking shall describe:
|
33. |
In relation to paragraph 30, the undertaking shall describe:
|
34. |
In relation to material risks and opportunities, the undertaking shall describe:
|
35. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it takes action to avoid causing or contributing to material negative impacts on value chain workers through its own practices, including, where relevant, in relation to procurement, sales and data use. This may include disclosing what approach is taken when tensions arise between the prevention or mitigation of material negative impacts and other business pressures. |
36. |
The undertaking shall also disclose whether severe human rights issues and incidents connected to its upstream and downstream value chain have been reported and, if applicable, disclose these (118). |
37. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraph 32 (c), the undertaking shall consider ESRS 2 (see ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets ) if it evaluates the effectiveness of an action by setting a target. |
38. |
The undertaking shall disclose what resources are allocated to the management of its material impacts, with information that enables users to gain an understanding of how the material impacts are managed. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement S2-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
39. |
The undertaking shall disclose the time-bound and outcome-oriented targets it may have set related to:
|
40. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking is using time-bound and outcome-oriented targets to drive and measure its progress in addressing material negative impacts, and/or advancing positive impacts on value chain workers, and/or in managing material risks and opportunities related to value chain workers. |
41. |
The summarised description of the targets to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to value chain workers shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T. |
42. |
The undertaking shall disclose the process for setting the
targets
, including whether and how the undertaking engaged directly with workers in the value chain, their legitimate representatives, or with
credible proxies
that have insight into their situation in:
|
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS S2 Workers in the value chain. It supports the application of the disclosure requirements set out in this standard and has the same authority as the other parts of ESRS S2.
Objective
AR 1. |
In addition to the issues listed in paragraph 2, the undertaking may also consider disclosing information about other issues relevant to a material impact for a shorter period of time, for instance initiatives regarding the health and safety of value chain workers during a pandemic. |
AR 2. |
The overview of social and human rights matters provided in paragraph 2 is not meant to imply that all of these issues should be disclosed in each Disclosure Requirement in this Standard. Rather, it provides a list of matters that the undertaking shall consider in its materiality assessment (ref. to ESRS 1 chapter 3 Double materiality as the basis for sustainability disclosures and ESRS 2 IRO-1) related to value chain workers and, as appropriate, disclose as material impacts, risks and opportunities within the scope of this Standard. |
AR 3. |
Examples of workers that fall within the scope of this Standard are:
|
ESRS 2 General disclosures
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 - Interests and views of stakeholders
AR 4. |
Disclosure Requirement ESRS 2 SBM-2 requires the undertaking to provide an understanding of whether and how it considers the role that its strategy and business model may play in creating, exacerbating or mitigating significant material impacts on value chain workers, and whether and how the business model and strategy are adapted to address such material impacts. |
AR 5. |
While value chain workers may not be engaging with the undertaking at the level of its strategy or business model, their views can inform the undertaking’s assessment of its strategy and business model. The undertaking may disclose the views of the value chain workers and value chain workers’ representatives. |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
AR 6. |
Impacts on value chain workers can originate in the undertaking’s strategy or business model in a number of different ways. For example, impacts may relate to the undertaking’s value proposition (such as providing lowest cost products or services, or high-speed delivery, in ways that put pressure on labour rights in the upstream and downstream value chains), its value chain (such as relying on commodities of unclear provenance, without visibility on impacts on workers), or its cost structure and the revenue model (e.g. shifting inventory risk to suppliers, with knock-on effects on the labour rights of their workers). |
AR 7. |
Impacts on value chain workers that originate in the strategy or the business model can also bring material risks to the undertaking. For example, in the context of a pandemic or other severe health crisis, undertakings that rely on contingent labour with little to no access to sick care and health benefits may face severe operational and business continuity risks as workers have no choice but to keep working while sick, further exacerbating the spread of the disease and causing major supply chain breakdowns. Another example is where selling goods premised on cheapest prices for customers create operational risks as suppliers under extreme price pressure may sub-contract production, leading to lower quality, and a longer, less transparent, and less controllable supply chain. Reputational and business opportunity risks linked to the exploitation of low-skilled, low-paid workers in sourcing geographies with minimal protections for them are also increasing with media backlash and consumer preferences moving to more ethically sourced or sustainable goods. |
AR 8. |
Examples of particular characteristics of value chain workers that may be considered by the undertaking when responding to paragraph 12 relate to young workers that may be more susceptible to impacts on their physical and mental development, or women workers in a context where women are routinely discriminated against in the terms and conditions of work, or migrant workers in a context where the market for the supply of labour is poorly regulated and workers are routinely charged recruitment fees. For some workers, the inherent nature of the activity that they are required to undertake may put them at risk (e.g., workers required to handle chemicals or operate certain equipment or low paid workers who are on “zero hours” contracts). |
AR 9. |
With regard to paragraph 13, material risks could also arise because of the undertaking’s dependency on value chain workers where low likelihood but high impact events may trigger financial effects; for example, where a global pandemic leads to severe health impacts on workers at all stages of the value chain resulting in major disruptions to production and distribution. Other examples of risk related to the undertaking’s dependency on value chain workers include a shortage in skilled workers or political decisions or legislation affecting value chain workers working for logistics providers. For example, if some workers in the undertaking’s value chain are at risk of forced labour , and the undertaking is importing products into countries where the law allows for the confiscation of imported goods that are suspected of being made with forced labour. |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement S2-1 – Policies related to value chain workers
AR 10. |
If the policies are limited to the undertaking’s own workforce and do not cover workers in upstream and downstream entities and relationships, they shall be disclosed under ESRS S1 and not in relation to this requirement. |
AR 11. |
If the disclosures under ESRS S1 include information relevant for workers in the value chain, a reference to this can be made here; disclosures on the remaining elements shall then be fulfilled under this Disclosure Requirement. |
AR 12. |
The undertaking may disclose explanations of significant changes to the policies adopted during the reporting year (e.g., new expectations for suppliers , new or additional approaches to due diligence and remedy). |
AR 13. |
The policy may take the form of a stand-alone policy regarding value chain workers or be included in a broader document such as a code of ethics or a general sustainability policy that has already been disclosed by the undertaking as part of another ESRS. In those cases, the undertaking shall provide an accurate cross-reference to identify the aspects of the policy that satisfy the requirements of this Disclosure Requirement. |
AR 14. |
When disclosing the alignment of its policies with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the undertaking shall consider that the Guiding Principles refer to the International Bill of Rights, which consist of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the two Covenants that implement it, as well as the International Labour Organisation’s Declaration on Fundamental Rights and Principles at Work and the core conventions that underpin it, and may disclose its alignment with these instruments. |
AR 15. |
When disclosing how external-facing policies are embedded, the undertaking may, for example, consider internal policies of responsible sourcing, and alignment with other policies relevant to value chain workers, for example, regarding forced labour . With regard to supplier codes of conduct that the undertaking may have, the summary shall indicate whether they include provisions addressing the safety of workers, precarious work (for example, the use of workers on short-term or limited hours contracts, workers employed via third parties, sub-contracting to third parties or use of informal workers), human trafficking, the use of forced labour or child labour , and whether such provisions are fully in line with applicable ILO standards. |
AR 16. |
The undertaking may provide an illustration of the types of communication of its policies to those individuals, group of individuals or entities for whom they are relevant, either because they are expected to implement them (for example, the undertaking’s employees , contractors and suppliers ), or because they have a direct interest in their implementation (for example, own workers, investors). It may disclose communication tools and channels (for example, flyers, newsletters, dedicated websites, social media, face to face interactions, workers’ representatives), aimed at ensuring that the policy is accessible and that different audiences understand its implications. The undertaking may also explain how it identifies and removes potential barriers for dissemination, such as through translation into relevant languages or the use of graphic depictions. |
Disclosure Requirement S2-2 – Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts
AR 17. |
When describing which function or role has operational responsibility for such engagement and/or ultimate accountability, the undertaking may disclose whether this is a dedicated role or function or part of a broader role or function, and whether any capacity building activities have been offered to support the staff to undertake engagement. If it cannot identify such a position or function, it may state that this is the case. This disclosure could also be fulfilled by making reference to information disclosed according to ESRS 2 GOV-1 The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies. |
AR 18. |
When preparing the disclosures described in paragraph 22 b) and c), the following illustrations may be considered:
|
AR 19. |
Global Framework Agreements (GFA) serve to establish an ongoing relationship between a multinational enterprise and a Global Union Federation to ensure that the undertaking adheres to the same standards in every country in which it operates. |
AR 20. |
To illustrate how the perspectives of value chain workers have informed specific decisions or activities of the undertaking, the undertaking may provide examples from the current reporting period. |
Disclosure Requirement S2-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns
AR 21. |
In fulfilling the requirements set out by Disclosure Requirement ESRS S2-3, the undertaking may be guided by the content of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises focused on remediation and grievance mechanisms. |
AR 22. |
Channels for raising concerns or needs include grievance mechanisms, hotlines, trade unions (where workers are unionised), dialogue processes or other means through which value chain workers or their legitimate representatives can raise concerns about impacts or explain needs that they would like the undertaking to address. This could include both channels provided by the undertaking directly and channels provided by the entities where the value chain workers are working, in addition to any other mechanisms the undertaking may use to gain insight into the management of impacts on workers, such as compliance audits. Where the undertaking is relying solely on information about the existence of such channels provided by its business relationships to answer this requirement, it may state that. |
AR 23. |
To provide greater insight into the information covered in Disclosure Requirement ESRS S2-3, the undertaking may explain whether and how value chain workers that may be affected are able to access channels at the level of the undertaking they are employed by, or contracted to work for, in relation to each material impact. |
AR 24. |
Third party mechanisms could include those operated by the government, NGOs, industry associations and other collaborative initiatives. The undertaking may disclose whether these are accessible to all workers who may be potentially or actually materially impacted by the undertaking, or individuals or organisations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of negative impacts. |
AR 25. |
In relation to the protection of individuals that use the mechanisms against the retaliation, the undertaking may describe whether it treats grievances confidentially and with respect to the rights of privacy and data protection; and whether the mechanisms allow for workers to use them anonymously (for example, through representation by a third party). |
AR 26. |
In disclosing whether and how the undertaking knows that value chain workers are aware of and trust any of these channels, the undertaking may provide relevant and reliable data about the effectiveness of these channels from the perspective of value chain workers themselves. Examples of sources of information are surveys of workers that have used such channels and their levels of satisfaction with the process and outcomes. |
AR 27. |
In describing the effectiveness of channels for
value chain
workers to raise concerns, the undertaking may be guided by the following questions, based on the “effectiveness criteria for non-judicial
grievance mechanisms”
, as laid out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, in particular Principle 31. The below considerations may be applied to individual channels or to a collective system of channels:
|
Disclosure Requirement S2-4 – Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions
AR 28. |
It may take time to understand negative impacts and how the undertaking may be involved with them through its value chain, as well as to identify appropriate responses and put them into practice. Therefore, the undertaking shall consider:
|
AR 29. |
Appropriate action can vary according to whether the undertaking causes or contributes to a material impact or whether the material impact is directly linked to its own operations, products or services through a business relationship. |
AR 30. |
Given that material negative impacts affecting value chain workers that have occurred during the reporting period may also be linked to entities or operations outside its direct control, the undertaking may disclose whether and how it seeks to use its leverage in its business relationships to manage those impacts. This may include using commercial leverage (for example, enforcing contractual requirements with business relationships or implementing incentives), other forms of leverage within the relationship (such as providing training or capacity-building on workers’ rights to entities with which the undertaking has a business relationships) or collaborative leverage with peers or other actors (such as initiatives aimed at responsible recruitment or ensuring workers receive an adequate wage ). |
AR 31. |
When the undertaking discloses its participation in an industry or multi-stakeholder initiative as part of its actions to address material negative impacts, the undertaking may disclose how the initiative, and its own involvement, is aiming to address the material impact concerned. It may disclose under ESRS S2-5 the relevant targets set by the initiative and progress towards them. |
AR 32. |
When disclosing whether and how the undertaking considers actual and potential impacts on value chain workers in decisions to terminate business relationships and whether and how it seeks to address any negative impacts that may result from termination, the undertaking may include examples. |
AR 33. |
In disclosing how it tracks the effectiveness of its actions to manage material impacts during the reporting period, the undertaking may disclose any lessons learned from the previous and current reporting periods. |
AR 34. |
Processes used to track the effectiveness of actions can include internal or external auditing or verification, court proceedings and/or related court decisions, impact assessments, measurement systems, stakeholder feedback, grievance mechanisms , external performance ratings, and benchmarking. |
AR 35. |
Reporting on effectiveness is aimed at enabling the understanding of the links between actions taken by the undertaking and the effective management of impacts. For example, to show the effectiveness of its actions to support its suppliers with improving their working conditions, the undertaking may disclose survey feedback from the suppliers’ workers showing that working conditions have improved since the time the undertaking began working with those suppliers. Additional information that the undertaking may provide includes data showing a decrease in the number of incidents identified through for instance, independent audits. |
AR 36. |
With regard to initiatives or processes the undertaking has in place that are based on affected workers’ needs and with regard to progress in the implementation of such initiatives or processes, the undertaking may disclose:
|
AR 37. |
The undertaking may disclose whether any initiatives or processes whose primary aim is to deliver positive impacts for value chain workers are designed also to support the achievement of one or more of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). For example, through a commitment to advance UN SDG 8 to “promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all” the undertaking may be providing capacity-building to smallholders in its supply chain , resulting in increases in their income; or it may be supporting training to increase the proportion of women able to take delivery jobs in its downstream value chain. |
AR 38. |
When disclosing the intended or achieved positive outcomes of its actions for value chain workers a distinction is to be made between evidence of certain activities having occurred (e.g., that x number of workers have received financial literacy training ) from evidence of actual outcomes for workers (e.g., that x workers report that they are able to better manage their household budgets so as to meet their savings goals). |
AR 39. |
When disclosing whether initiatives or processes also play a role in mitigating material negative impacts, the undertaking may e.g., consider programmes that aim to advance women workers’ financial literacy that have resulted in more women being promoted as well as in reports of reduced sexual harassment in the workplace. |
AR 40. |
When disclosing the material risks and opportunities related to the undertaking’s impacts or
dependencies
on
value chain
workers, the undertaking may consider the following:
|
AR 41. |
When disclosing whether dependencies turn into risks, the undertaking shall consider external developments. |
AR 42. |
When disclosing policies, actions and resources and targets related to the management of material risks and opportunities , in cases where risks and opportunities arise from a material impact , the undertaking may cross-reference its disclosures on policies, action and resources and targets in relation to that impact. |
AR 43. |
The undertaking shall consider whether and how its process(es) to manage material risks related to value chain workers are integrated into its existing risk management process(es). |
AR 44. |
When disclosing the resources allocated to the management of material impacts, the undertaking may disclose which internal functions are involved in managing the impacts and what types of action they take to address negative and advance positive impacts. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement S2-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
AR 45. |
When disclosing information about
targets
in accordance with paragraph 39, the undertaking may disclose:
|
AR 46. |
Targets related to material risks and opportunities may be the same as or distinct from targets related to material impacts . For example, a target to reach living wages for supply chain workers could both reduce impacts on those workers and reduce associated risks in terms of the quality and reliability of supply. |
AR 47. |
The undertaking may also distinguish between short-, medium- and long-term targets covering the same policy commitment. For example, the undertaking may have a long-term target to achieve an 80% reduction in health and safety incidents affecting the workers of a given supplier by 2030 and a near-term target to reduce their overtime hours of delivery drivers by x% while maintaining their income by 2024. |
AR 48. |
When modifying or replacing a target in the reporting period, the undertaking may explain the change by cross-referencing it to significant changes in the business model or to broader changes in the accepted standard or legislation from which the target is derived to provide contextual information, as per ESRS 2 BP-2 Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances. |
ESRS S3
AFFECTED COMMUNITIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
Interaction with other ESRS
Disclosure Requirements
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Strategy
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders |
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement S3-1 – Policies related to affected communities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S3-2 – Processes for engaging with affected communities about impacts |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S3-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for affected communities to raise concerns |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S3-4 – Taking action on material impacts on affected communities, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to affected communities, and effectiveness of those actions |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement S3-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunitie |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
– |
Objective |
– |
ESRS 2 General Disclosures |
Strategy
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders |
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement S3-1 – Policies related to affected communities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S3-2 – Processes for engaging with affected communities about impacts |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S3-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for affected communities to raise concerns |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S3-4 – Taking action on material impacts, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to affected communities, and effectiveness of those actions and approaches |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement S3-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities |
Objective
1. |
The objective of this Standard is to specify disclosure requirements which will enable
users
of the
sustainability statement
to understand material impacts on
affected communities
connected with the undertaking’s own operations and value chain, including through its products or services, as well as through its
business relationships
, and its related material risks and opportunities, including:
|
2. |
In order to meet the objective, this Standard requires an explanation of the general approach the undertaking takes to identify and manage any material actual and potential impacts on
affected communities
in relation to:
|
3. |
This Standard also requires an explanation of how such impacts, as well as the undertaking’s dependencies on affected communities, can create material risks or opportunities for the undertaking. For example, negative relationships with affected communities may disrupt the undertaking’s own operations or harm its reputation, while constructive relationships can bring business benefits, such as stable and conflict-free operations and a greater ease of recruiting locally. |
Interaction with other ESRS
4. |
This standard applies when material impacts on and/or material risks and opportunities related to affected communities have been identified through the materiality assessment process laid out in ESRS 2 General disclosures. |
5. |
This Standard shall be read in conjunction with ESRS 1 General requirements, and ESRS 2, as well as the ESRS S1 Own workforce, ESRS S2 Workers in the value chain and ESRS S4 Consumers and end-users. |
Disclosure Requirements
ESRS 2 General disclosures
6. |
The requirements of this section should be read in conjunction with the disclosures required by ESRS 2 on Strategy (SBM). The resulting disclosures shall be presented alongside the disclosures required by ESRS 2, except for SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model, for which the undertaking has an option to present the disclosures alongside the topical disclosure. |
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
7. |
When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-2, paragraph 43, the undertaking shall disclose how the views, interests, and rights of affected communities , including respect for their human rights (and their rights as indigenous peoples , where applicable), inform its strategy and business model. Affected communities are a key group of affected stakeholders . |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
8. |
When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose:
|
9. |
When fulfilling the requirements of paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose whether all
affected communities
who are likely to be materially impacted by the undertaking, including impacts that are connected with the undertaking’s own operations and
value chain
, including through its products or services, as well as through its
business relationships
, are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2. In addition, the undertaking shall provide the following information:
|
10. |
In describing the main types of communities who are or could be negatively affected, based on the materiality assessment set out in Disclosure Requirement ESRS 2 IRO-1, the undertaking shall disclose whether and how it has developed an understanding of how affected communities with particular characteristics or those living in particular contexts, or those undertaking particular activities may be at greater risk of harm. |
11. |
The undertaking shall disclose which, if any, of its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on affected communities relate to specific groups of affected communities rather than to all affected communities. |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement S3-1 – Policies related to affected communities
12. |
The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts on affected communities, as well as associated material risks and opportunities. |
13. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of material impacts on affected communities specifically, as well as policies that cover material risks or opportunities related to affected communities. |
14. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 12 shall contain the information on the undertaking’s policies to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to affected communities in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. In addition, the undertaking shall specify if such policies cover specific affected communities or all affected communities. |
15. |
The undertaking shall disclose any particular policy provisions for preventing and addressing impacts on indigenous peoples . |
16. |
The undertaking shall describe its human rights
policy
commitments (119) that are relevant to affected communities, including those processes and mechanisms to monitor compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. In its disclosure it shall focus on those matters that are material in relation to (120), as well as its general approach to:
|
17. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how its policies with regard to affected communities are aligned with internationally recognised standards relevant to communities and indigenous peoples specifically, including the United Nations (UN) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The undertaking shall also disclose the extent to which cases of non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises that involve affected communities have been reported in its own operations or in its upstream and downstream value chain and, if applicable, an indication of the nature of such cases (121). |
18. |
The policy may take the form of a stand-alone policy regarding communities or be included in a broader document such as a code of ethics or a general sustainability policy that has already been disclosed by the undertaking as part of another ESRS. In those cases, the undertaking shall provide an accurate cross-reference to identify the aspects of the policy that satisfy the requirements of this Disclosure Requirement. |
Disclosure Requirement S3-2 – Processes for engaging with affected communities about impacts
19. |
The undertaking shall disclose its general processes for engaging with affected communities and their representatives about actual and potential impacts on them. |
20. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of whether and how the undertaking engages, as part of its ongoing due diligence process, with affected communities, their legitimate representatives, or with credible proxies , about material actual and potential positive and/or negative impacts that do or are likely to affect them, and whether and how perspectives of affected communities are taken into account in the decision-making processes of the undertaking. |
21. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how the perspectives of
affected communities
inform its decisions or activities aimed at managing actual and potential impacts on communities. This shall include, where relevant, an explanation of:
|
22. |
Where applicable, the undertaking shall disclose the steps it takes to gain insight into the perspectives of affected communities that may be particularly vulnerable to impacts and/or marginalised, and into the perspective of specific groups within the affected communities, such as women and girls. |
23. |
Where affected communities are indigenous peoples , the undertaking shall also disclose how it takes into account and ensures respect of their particular rights in its stakeholder engagement approach, including their right to free, prior and informed consent with regard to: (i) their cultural, intellectual, religious and spiritual property; (ii) activities affecting their lands and territories; and (iii) legislative or administrative measures that affect them. In particular, where engagement occurs with indigenous peoples, the undertaking shall also disclose whether and how indigenous peoples have been consulted on the mode and parameters of the engagement (for example, in designing the agenda, nature, and timeliness of the engagement). |
24. |
If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a general process to engage with affected communities, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a process in place. |
Disclosure Requirement S3-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for affected communities to raise concerns
25. |
The undertaking shall describe the processes it has in place to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of negative impacts on affected communities that the undertaking is connected with, as well as channels available to affected communities to raise concerns and have them addressed. |
26. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the formal means by which affected communities can make their concerns and needs known directly to the undertaking, and/or through which the undertaking supports the availability of such channels (for example, grievance mechanisms ) by its business relationships, how follow up is performed with these communities regarding the issues raised, and the effectiveness of these channels. |
27. |
The undertaking shall describe:
|
28. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it assesses that affected communities are aware of and trust these structures or processes as a way to raise their concerns or needs and have them addressed. In addition, the undertaking shall disclose whether it has policies in place regarding the protection of individuals that use them against retaliation. If such information has been disclosed in accordance with ESRS G1-1, the undertaking may refer to that information. |
29. |
If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a channel for raising concerns and/or does not support the availability of such a channel by its business relationships, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a channel or processes in place. |
Disclosure Requirement S3-4 – Taking action on material impacts on affected communities, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to affected communities, and effectiveness of those actions
30. |
The undertaking shall disclose how it takes action to address material impacts on affected communities, and to manage material risks and pursue material opportunities related to affected communities and the effectiveness of those actions. |
31. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is twofold. Firstly, it is to provide an understanding of any
actions
and initiatives through which the undertaking seeks to:
Secondly, it is to enable an understanding of the ways in which the undertaking is addressing the material risks and pursuing the material opportunities related to affected communities. The undertaking shall provide a summarised description of the action plans and resources to manage its material impacts, risks, and opportunities related to affected communities as per ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters. |
32. |
In relation to material impacts, the undertaking shall describe:
|
33. |
In relation to paragraph 29, the undertaking shall describe:
|
34. |
In relation to material risks and opportunities, the undertaking shall describe:
|
35. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it takes action to avoid causing or contributing to material negative impacts on affected communities through its own practices, including, where relevant, in relation to planning, land acquisition and exploitation, finance, extraction or production of raw materials, use of natural resources, and management of environmental impacts. This may include disclosing what approach is taken when tensions arise between the prevention or mitigation of material negative impacts and other business pressures. |
36. |
The undertaking shall also disclose whether severe human rights issues and incidents connected to affected communities have been reported and, if applicable, disclose these (122). |
37. |
When disclosing the information required under paragraph 31 (c), the undertaking shall consider ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets if it evaluates the effectiveness of an action by setting a target. |
38. |
The undertaking shall disclose what resources are allocated to the management of its material impacts, with information that enables users to gain an understanding of how the material impacts are managed. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement S3-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
39. |
The undertaking shall disclose the time-bound and outcome-oriented targets it may have set related to:
|
40. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking is using time-bound and outcome-oriented targets to drive and measure its progress in addressing material negative impacts, and/or advancing positive impacts on affected communities, and/or in managing material risks and opportunities related to affected communities. |
41. |
The summarised description of the targets to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to affected communities shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T. |
42. |
The undertaking shall disclose the process for setting the
targets
, including whether and how the undertaking engaged directly with affected communities, their legitimate representatives, or with
credible proxies
that have insight into their situation in:
|
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS S3 Affected communities. It supports the application of the disclosure requirements set out in this standard and has the same authority as the other parts of the standard.
Objective
AR 1. |
The overview of social and human rights matters provided in paragraph 2 is not meant to imply that all of these issues should be disclosed in each Disclosure Requirement in this Standard. Rather, it provides a list of matters that the undertaking shall consider in its materiality assessment (ref. to ESRS 1 chapter 3 Double materiality as the basis for sustainability disclosures and ESRS 2 IRO-1) related to affected communities and, as appropriate, disclose as material impacts, risks and opportunities within the scope of this Standard. |
AR 2. |
In addition to the issues listed in paragraph 2, the undertaking may also consider disclosing information about other issues relevant to a material impact for a shorter period of time, for instance initiatives regarding the impacts on communities related to the undertaking’s operations due to extreme and sudden weather conditions. |
ESRS 2 General Disclosures
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
AR 3. |
Disclosure Requirement ESRS 2 SBM-2 requires the undertaking to provide an understanding of if and how it considers the role that its strategy and business model may play in creating, exacerbating or mitigating significant material impacts on affected communities , and whether and how the business model and strategy are adapted to address such material impacts. |
AR 4. |
While affected communities may not be engaging with the undertaking at the level of its strategy or business model , their views can inform the undertaking’s assessment of its strategy and business model. The undertaking may disclose the views of affected communities and affected communities' representatives. |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
AR 5. |
Impacts on affected communities can originate in the undertaking’s strategy or business model in a number of different ways. For example, impacts may relate to the undertaking’s value proposition (such as, construction or commencement of projects with timelines that do not allow sufficient time for consultation with groups affected by the projects), its value chain (for example, land-use in countries in which ownership is often contested or records are unreliable or in which land-users such as indigenous peoples are unrecognised), or its cost structure and the revenue model (such as, aggressive strategies to minimise taxation, particularly with respect to operations in developing countries). |
AR 6. |
Impacts on affected communities that originate in the strategy or business model can also bring material risks to the undertaking. For example, where the undertaking’s strategy involves moving into higher risk geographies in pursuit of certain commodities, and if affected communities resist its presence or object to its local practices, this may create extensive and costly delays, and affect the undertaking’s ability to secure future land concessions or permits. Similarly, if the undertaking’s business model relies on intensive water extraction at its plants, to the extent that it affects access to water for communities’ consumption, hygiene and livelihoods, this may result in reputationally-damaging boycotts, complaints and lawsuits. |
AR 7. |
Examples of particular characteristics of affected communities that may be considered by the undertaking when responding to paragraph 10 may be an affected community that is physically or economically isolated and is particularly susceptible to introduced diseases or has limited access to social services and therefore relies on infrastructure set up by the undertaking. It may be because where land worked by women is purchased by the undertaking and payments go to male heads of households, women become further disenfranchised in the community. It may also be because the community is indigenous, and its members seek to exercise cultural or economic rights to the land owned or used by the undertaking – or by one of the entities with which it has a business relationship – in a context where their rights are not protected by the state. In addition, the undertaking shall consider whether different characteristics overlap. For example, characteristics such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, migrant status and gender may create overlapping risks of harm for certain affected communities, or for distinct parts of those affected communities, since affected communities are often heterogeneous in nature. |
AR 8. |
With regard to paragraph 11, material risks could also arise because of the undertaking’s dependency on affected communities where low likelihood but high impact events may trigger financial effects; for example, where a natural disaster leads to a catastrophic industrial accident involving the undertaking’s operations, resulting in severe harm to affected communities. |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement S3-1 – Policies related to affected communities
AR 9. |
The description shall include the key information necessary to ensure a faithful representation of the policies in relation to affected communities and, therefore, the undertaking shall consider explanations of significant changes to the policies adopted during the reporting year (for example, new or additional approaches to engagement, due diligence and remedy). |
AR 10. |
When disclosing the alignment of its policies with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the undertaking shall consider that the Guiding Principles refer to the International Bill of Rights, which consists of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the two Covenants that implement it, as well as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the International Labour Organisation’s Convention concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (ILO No. 169) and the core conventions that underpin it, and may disclose its alignment with these instruments. |
AR 11. |
The undertaking may provide an illustration of the types of communication of its policies to those individuals, group of individuals or entities for whom they are relevant, either because they are expected to implement them (for example, the undertaking’s employees , contractors and suppliers ), or because they have a direct interest in their implementation (for example, own workers, investors). It may disclose communication tools and channels (for example, flyers, newsletters, dedicated websites, social media, face to face interactions, workers’ representatives), aimed at ensuring that the policy is accessible and that different audiences understand its implications. The undertaking may also explain how it identifies and removes potential barriers for dissemination, such as through translation into relevant languages or the use of graphic depictions. |
AR 12. |
When disclosing severe human rights issues and incidents connected to affected communities, the undertaking shall consider any legal disputes related to land rights and to the free, prior and informed consent of indigenous peoples . |
Disclosure Requirement S3-2 – Processes for engaging with affected communities about impacts
AR 13. |
Explanations of how the undertaking takes into account and ensures respect of the right of indigenous peoples to free, prior and informed consent may include information about processes to consult with indigenous peoples to obtain such consent. The undertaking shall consider how the consultation includes a good faith negotiation with affected indigenous peoples to obtain their free, prior and informed consent where the undertaking affects the lands, territories or resources that indigenous peoples customarily own, occupy or otherwise use; or relocates them from land or territories subject to traditional ownership or under customary use or occupation; or affects or exploits their cultural, intellectual, religious and spiritual property. |
AR 14. |
When describing which function or role has operational responsibility for such engagement and/or ultimate accountability, the undertaking may disclose whether this is a dedicated role or function or part of a broader role or function, and whether any capacity building activities have been offered to support the staff to undertake engagement. If it cannot identify such a position or function, it may state that this is the case. This disclosure could also be fulfilled by making reference to information disclosed according to ESRS 2 GOV-1 The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies. |
AR 15. |
When preparing the disclosures described in paragraph 20 b) and c), the following illustrations may be considered:
|
AR 16. |
To illustrate how the perspectives of communities have informed specific decisions or activities of the undertaking, the undertaking may provide examples from the current reporting period. |
Disclosure Requirement S3-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for affected communities to raise concerns
AR 17. |
In fulfilling the requirements set out by Disclosure Requirement ESRS S3-3, the undertaking may be guided by the content of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises focused on remediation and grievance mechanisms. |
AR 18. |
Channels for raising concerns or needs, include grievance mechanisms, hotlines, dialogue processes or other means through which affected communities or their legitimate representatives can raise concerns about impacts or explain needs that they would like the undertaking to address. This could include channels provided by the undertaking directly, in addition to any other mechanisms the undertaking may use to gain insight into the management of impacts on communities, such as compliance audits. Where the undertaking is relying solely on information about the existence of such channels provided by its business relationships to answer this requirement, it may state that. |
AR 19. |
To provide greater insight into the information covered in ESRS S3-3, the undertaking may explain whether and how communities that may be affected are able to access channels at the level of the undertaking they are affected by, in relation to each material impact. Relevant insights include information on whether affected communities can access channels in a language they understand, and whether they have been consulted in the design of such channels. |
AR 20. |
Third party mechanisms could include those operated by the government, NGOs, industry associations and other collaborative initiatives. The undertaking may disclose whether these are accessible to all affected communities who may be potentially or actually materially impacted by the undertaking, or individuals or organisations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of negative impacts. |
AR 21. |
In relation to the protection of individuals that use the mechanisms against retaliation, the undertaking may describe whether it treats grievances confidentially and with respect to the rights of privacy and data protection; and whether to the mechanisms can be used anonymously (for example, through representation by a third party). |
AR 22. |
When disclosing processes related to providing and enabling remedy for indigenous peoples , relevant information includes whether and how the undertaking has considered their customs, traditions, rules and legal systems. |
AR 23. |
In disclosing whether and how the undertaking knows that affected communities are aware of and trust any of these channels, the undertaking may provide relevant and reliable data about the effectiveness of these channels from the perspective of affected communities themselves. Examples of sources of information are surveys of community members that have used such channels and their levels of satisfaction with the process and outcomes. |
AR 24. |
In describing the effectiveness of channels for
affected communities
to raise concerns, the undertaking may be guided by the following questions, based on the “effectiveness criteria for non- judicial
grievance mechanisms”
, as laid out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, in particular Principle 31. The below considerations may be applied on an individual channel basis or for the collective system of channels:
|
Disclosure Requirement S3-4 – Taking action on material impacts on affected communities, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to affected communities, and effectiveness of those actions
AR 25. |
It may take time to understand negative impacts and how the undertaking may be involved with them through its value chain, as well as to identify appropriate responses and put them into practice. Therefore, the undertaking shall consider:
|
AR 26. |
Appropriate action can vary according to whether the undertaking causes or contributes to a material impact, or whether the material impact is directly linked to its own operations, products or services through a business relationship. |
AR 27. |
Given that material negative impacts affecting communities that have occurred during the reporting period may also be linked to entities or operations outside its direct control, the undertaking may disclose whether and how it seeks to use its leverage in its business relationships to manage those impacts. This may include using commercial leverage (for example, enforcing contractual requirements with business relationships or implementing incentives), other forms of leverage within the relationship (such as providing training or capacity-building on the rights of indigenous peoples to entities with which the undertaking has a business relationships) or collaborative leverage with peers or other actors (such as initiatives aimed at minimising security-related impacts on communities or participating in company-community partnerships). |
AR 28. |
Impacts on communities may stem from environmental matters which are disclosed by the undertaking under the ESRS E1 to E5. Examples include:
Where the connection between environmental impacts and local communities is addressed in the disclosures within the Disclosure Requirements ESRS E1-E5, the undertaking may cross-reference to those and clearly identify such disclosures. |
AR 29. |
When the undertaking discloses its participation in an industry or multi-stakeholder initiative as part of its actions to address material negative impacts, the undertaking may disclose how the initiative, and its own involvement, is aiming to address the material impact concerned. It may disclose under ESRS S3-5 the relevant targets set by the initiative and progress towards them. |
AR 30. |
When disclosing whether and how the undertaking considers actual and potential impacts on affected communities in decisions to terminate business relationships and whether and how it seeks to address any negative impacts that may result from termination, the undertaking may include examples. |
AR 31. |
In disclosing how it tracks the effectiveness of actions to manage material impacts during the reporting period, the undertaking may disclose any lessons learned from the previous and current reporting periods. |
AR 32. |
Processes used to track the effectiveness of actions can include internal or external auditing or verification, court proceedings and/or related court decisions, impact assessments, measurement systems, stakeholder feedback, grievance mechanisms, external performance ratings, and benchmarking. |
AR 33. |
Reporting on effectiveness is aimed at enabling the understanding of the links between actions taken by an undertaking and the effective management of impacts. |
AR 34. |
With regard to initiatives or processes whose primary aim is to deliver positive impacts for affected communities that are based on affected communities’ needs, and with regard to progress in the implementation of such initiatives or processes, the undertaking may disclose:
|
AR 35. |
The undertaking may disclose whether any initiatives or processes whose primary aim is to deliver positive impacts for affected communities are designed also to support the achievement of one or more of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). For example, through a commitment to advance UN SDG 5 to “achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls” the undertaking may be taking thoughtful measures to include women in the consultation process with an affected community to meet standards of effective stakeholder engagement , which can help empower the women in the process itself, but potentially also in their daily lives. |
AR 36. |
When disclosing the intended or achieved positive outcomes of its actions for affected communities a distinction is to be made between evidence of certain activities having occurred (for example, that x number of women community members have been provided with training on how to become local suppliers to the undertaking) from evidence of actual outcomes for affected communities (for example, that x women community members have set up small businesses and have had their contracts with the undertaking renewed year-on-year). |
AR 37. |
When disclosing whether initiatives or processes also play a role in mitigating material negative impacts, the undertaking may for example consider programmes that aim to improve local infrastructure surrounding an undertaking’s operations, such as improvements in roads leading to a reduction in the number of severe traffic accidents involving community members. |
AR 38. |
When disclosing the material risks and opportunities related to the undertaking’s impacts or
dependencies
on affected communities, the undertaking may consider the following:
|
AR 39. |
In disclosing the information in AR 41, the undertaking may consider explanations of risks and opportunities stemming from environmental impacts or dependencies (please refer to AR 31 for further details), including related human rights (or social) impacts. Examples include reputational risks stemming from the impact on the health of communities of unmanaged polluting discharges ; or the financial effects of protests that may disrupt or interrupt an undertaking’s activities, for example, in response to operations in water stressed areas that may impact the lives of affected communities. |
AR 40. |
When disclosing whether dependencies turn into risks, the undertaking shall consider external developments. |
AR 41. |
When disclosing policies, action and resources and targets related to the management of material risks and opportunities, in cases where risks and opportunities arise from a material impact, the undertaking may cross-reference its disclosures on policies, actions and resources and targets in relation to that impact. |
AR 42. |
The undertaking shall consider whether and how its processes to manage material risks related to affected communities are integrated into its existing risk management processes. |
AR 43. |
When disclosing the resources allocated to the management of material impacts, the undertaking may disclose which internal functions are involved in managing the impacts and what types of action they take to address negative and advance positive impacts. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement S3-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
AR 44. |
When disclosing information about
targets
in accordance with paragraph 38, the undertaking may disclose:
|
AR 45. |
Targets related to material risks and opportunities may be the same as or distinct from targets related to material impacts. For example, a target to fully restore livelihoods of affected communities following resettlement could both reduce impacts on those communities and reduce associated risks such as community protests. |
AR 46. |
The undertaking may also distinguish between short-, medium- and long-term targets covering the same policy commitment. For example, the undertaking may have as a main objective to employ community members at a local mining site , with the long-term goal of staffing 100% locally by 2025, and with the short-term objective of adding x percent of local employees every year up and until 2025. |
AR 47. |
When modifying or replacing a target in the reporting period, the undertaking may explain the change by linking it to significant changes in the business model or to broader changes in the accepted standard or legislation from which the target is derived to provide contextual information as per ESRS 2 BP-2 Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances. |
ESRS S4
CONSUMERS AND END-USERS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
Interaction with other ESRS
Disclosure Requirements
– |
ESRS 2 General Disclosures |
Strategy
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders |
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business mode |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement S4-1 – Policies related to consumers and end-users |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S4-2 – Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S4-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S4-4 – Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end-users, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement S4-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
– |
Objective |
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Strategy
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders |
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement S4-1 – Policies related to consumers and end-users |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S4-2 – Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S4-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns |
— |
Disclosure Requirement S4-4 – Taking action on material impacts, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users and effectiveness of those actions and approaches |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement S4-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities |
Objective
1. |
The objective of this Standard is to specify disclosure requirements which will enable
users
of the
sustainability statement
to understand material
impacts
on
consumers
and
end-users
connected with the undertaking’s own operations and
value chain
, including through its products or services, as well as through its
business relationships
, and its related material
risks
and
opportunities
, including:
|
2. |
In order to meet the objective, this Standard requires an explanation of the general approach the undertaking takes to identify and manage any material actual and potential
impacts
on the
consumers
and/or
end-users
related to its products and/or services in relation to:
|
3. |
This Standard also requires an explanation of how such impacts, as well as the undertaking’s dependencies on consumers and/or end-users, can create material risks or opportunities for the undertaking. For example, negative impacts on the reputation of the undertaking’s products and/or services can be detrimental to its business performance, while trust in products and/or services can bring business benefits, such as increased sales or widening of the future consumer base. |
4. |
The unlawful use or misuse of the undertaking’s products and services by consumers and end-users fall outside the scope of this standard. |
Interaction with other ESRS
5. |
This standard applies when material impacts on and/or material risks and opportunities related to consumers and/or end-users have been identified through the materiality assessment process laid out in ESRS 2 General disclosures. |
6. |
This Standard shall be read in conjunction with ESRS 1 General requirements, and ESRS 2, as well as ESRS S1 Own workforce, ESRS S2 Workers in the value chain and ESRS S3 Affected communities. |
Disclosure Requirements
ESRS 2 General Disclosures
7. |
The requirements of this section should be read in conjunction with the disclosures required by ESRS 2 on Strategy (SBM). The resulting disclosures shall be presented alongside the disclosures required by ESRS 2, except for SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model, for which the undertaking has an option to present the disclosures alongside the topical disclosure. |
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
8. |
When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-2, paragraph 43, the undertaking shall disclose how the interests, views and rights of its consumers and/or end-users, including respect for their human rights, inform its strategy and business model. Consumers and/or end-users are a key group of affected stakeholders . |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
9. |
When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose:
|
10. |
When fulfilling the requirements of paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose whether all
consumers
and/or
end-users
who are likely to be materially impacted by the undertaking, including
impacts
connected with the undertaking’s own operations and
value chain
, including through its products or services, as well as through its
business relationships
, are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2. In addition, the undertaking shall disclose the following information:
|
11. |
In describing the main types of consumers and/or end-users who are or could be negatively affected, based on the materiality assessment set out in ESRS 2 IRO-1, the undertaking shall disclose whether and how it has developed an understanding of how consumers and/or end-users with particular characteristics, or those using particular products or services, may be at greater risk of harm. |
12. |
The undertaking shall disclose which, if any, of its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on consumers and/or end-users, relate to specific groups of consumers and/or end-users (for example, particular age groups) rather than to all consumers and/or end-users. |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement S4-1 – Policies related to consumers and end-users
13. |
The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts of its products and/or services on consumers and end-users, as well as associated material risks and opportunities. |
14. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of material impacts on consumers and/or end-users specifically, as well as policies that cover material risks or opportunities related to consumers and/or end-users. |
15. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 13 shall contain the information on the undertaking’s policies to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to consumers and/or end-users in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. In addition, the undertaking shall specify if such policies cover specific groups or all consumers and/or end-users. |
16. |
The undertaking shall describe its human rights
policy
commitments (123) that are relevant to
consumers
and/or
end-users,
including those processes and mechanisms to monitor compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. In its disclosure it shall focus on those matters that are material, as well as the general approach in relation to (124):
|
17. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how its policies with regard to consumers and/or end-users are aligned with internationally recognised instruments relevant to consumers and/or end-users, including United Nations (UN) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The undertaking shall also disclose the extent to which cases of non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises that involve consumers and/or end-users have been reported in its downstream value chain and, if applicable, an indication of the nature of such cases (125). |
Disclosure Requirement S4-2 – Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts
18. |
The undertaking shall disclose its general processes for engaging with consumers and end-users and their representatives about actual and potential impacts on them. |
19. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of whether and how the undertaking engages, as part of its ongoing due diligence process, with consumers and/or end-users , their legitimate representatives, or with credible proxies , about material actual and potential positive and/or negative impacts that do or are likely to affect them, and whether and how perspectives of consumers and/or end-users are taken into account in the decision-making processes of the undertaking. |
20. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how the perspectives of
consumers
and/or
end-users
inform its decisions or activities aimed at managing actual and potential impacts on consumers and/or end-users. This shall include, where relevant, an explanation of:
|
21. |
Where applicable, the undertaking shall disclose the steps it takes to gain insight into the perspectives of consumers and/or end-users that may be particularly vulnerable to impacts and/or marginalised (for example, people with disabilities, children, etc.). |
22. |
If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a general process to engage with consumers and/or end-users , it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a process in place. |
Disclosure Requirement S4-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns
23. |
The undertaking shall describe the processes it has in place to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of negative impacts on consumers and end-users that the undertaking is connected with, as well as channels available to consumers and end-users to raise concerns and have them addressed. |
24. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the formal means by which consumers and/or end-users can make their concerns and needs known directly to the undertaking, and/or through which the undertaking supports the availability of such channels (for example, grievance mechanisms ) by its business relationships, how follow up is performed with these consumers and/or end-users regarding the issues raised, and the effectiveness of these channels. |
25. |
The undertaking shall describe:
|
26. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it assesses that consumers and/or end-users are aware of and trust these structures or processes as a way to raise their concerns or needs and have them addressed. In addition, the undertaking shall disclose whether it has policies in place to protect individuals from retaliation when they use such structures or processes. If such information has been disclosed in accordance with ESRS G1-1, the undertaking may refer to that information. |
27. |
If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a channel for raising concerns and/or does not support the availability of mechanisms by its business relationships, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a channel or processes in place. |
Disclosure Requirement S4-4 – Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end- users, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions
28. |
The undertaking shall disclose how it takes action to address material impacts on consumers and end-users, and to manage material risks and pursue material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions. |
29. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is twofold. Firstly, it is to provide an understanding of any
actions
and initiatives through which the undertaking seeks to:
Secondly, it is to enable an understanding of the ways in which the undertaking is addressing the material risks and pursuing the material opportunities related to consumers and/or end-users. |
30. |
The undertaking shall provide a summarised description of the action plans and resources to manage its material impacts, risks, and opportunities related to consumers and end-users as per ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters. |
31. |
In relation to material impacts, the undertaking shall describe:
|
32. |
In relation to paragraph 28, the undertaking shall describe:
|
33. |
In relation to material risks and opportunities, the undertaking shall describe:
|
34. |
The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it takes action to avoid causing or contributing to material negative impacts on consumers and/or end-users through its own practices, including, where relevant, in relation to marketing, sales and data use. This may include disclosing what approach is taken when tensions arise between the prevention or mitigation of material negative impacts and other business pressures. |
35. |
When preparing this disclosure, the undertaking shall consider whether severe human rights issues and incidents connected to its consumers and/or end-users have been reported and, if applicable, disclose these (126). |
36. |
Where the undertaking evaluates the effectiveness of an action by setting a target, in disclosing the information required under paragraph 32 (c), the undertaking shall consider ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets. |
37. |
The undertaking shall disclose what resources are allocated to the management of its material impacts with information that enables users to gain an understanding of how the material impacts are managed. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement S4-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
38. |
The undertaking shall disclose the time-bound and outcome-oriented targets it may have set related to:
|
39. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking is using time-bound and outcome-oriented targets to drive and measure progress in addressing material negative impacts, and/or advancing positive impacts on consumers and/or end-users , and/or in managing material risks and opportunities related to consumers and/or end-users . |
40. |
The summarised description of the targets to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to consumers and/or end-users shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T. |
41. |
The undertaking shall disclose the process for setting the
targets
, including whether and how the undertaking engaged directly with
consumers
and/or
end-users
, their legitimate representatives, or with
credible proxies
that have insight into their situation in:
|
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS S4 Consumers and end-users. It supports the application of the requirements set out in this standard and has the same authority as the other parts of the standard.
Objective
AR 1. |
The undertaking may highlight special issues relevant to a material impact for a shorter period of time, for instance initiatives regarding the health and safety of consumers and/or end-users in relation to contamination of a product or severe breach of privacy due to a massive data leak. |
AR 2. |
The overview of social and human rights matters provided in paragraph 2 is not meant to imply that all of these issues should be disclosed in each Disclosure Requirement in this Standard. Rather, it provides a list of matters that the undertaking shall consider in its materiality assessment (ref. to ESRS 1 chapter 3 Double materiality as the basis for sustainability disclosures and ESRS 2 IRO-1) related to consumers and/or end-users and, subsequently, disclose as material impacts, risks and opportunities within the scope of this Standard. |
ESRS 2 General disclosures
Strategy
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
AR 3. |
ESRS 2 SBM-2 requires the undertaking to provide an understanding of if and how it considers whether its strategy and business model play a role in creating, exacerbating or (conversely) mitigating significant material impacts on consumers and/or end-users, and whether and how the business model and strategy are adapted to address such material impacts. |
AR 4. |
While consumers and/or end-users may not be engaging with the undertaking at the level of its strategy or business model, their views can inform the undertaking’s assessment of its strategy and business model. The undertaking may disclose the views of the (actual or potential) materially affected consumers and/or end-users’ legitimate representatives or those of credible proxies that have insight into their situation. |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
AR 5. |
Impacts on consumers and/or end-users can originate in the undertaking’s business model or strategy in a number of different ways. For example, impacts may relate to the undertaking’s value proposition (for example, providing online platforms with potential for online and offline harm), its value chain (for example, speed in developing products or services, or delivering projects, with risks to health and safety), or its cost structure and the revenue model (for example, sales-maximising incentives that put consumers at risk). |
AR 6. |
Impacts on consumers and/or end-users that originate in the strategy or business model can also bring material risks to the undertaking. For example, if the undertaking’s business model is premised on incentivising its sales force to sell high volumes of a product or service (for example, credit cards or pain medicine) at speed, and this results in large- scale harm to consumers, the undertaking may face lawsuits and reputational damage affecting its future business and credibility. |
AR 7. |
Examples of particular characteristics of consumers and/or end-users that may be considered by the undertaking when responding to paragraph 11 include young consumers and/or end-users who may be more susceptible to impacts on their physical and mental development, or who lack financial literacy and may be more susceptible to exploitative sales or marketing practices. They may also include women in a context where women are routinely discriminated against in their access to particular services or in the marketing of particular products. |
AR 8. |
With regard to paragraph 12, the risks could arise because of the undertaking’s dependency on consumers and/or end-users where low likelihood but high impact events may trigger financial effects, for example, where a global pandemic leads to severe impacts on certain consumers’ livelihoods resulting in major changes in patterns of consumption. |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement S4-1 – Policies related to consumers and end-users
AR 9. |
The description shall include the key information necessary to ensure a faithful representation of the policies in relation to consumers and end-users, and therefore, the undertaking shall consider explanations of significant changes to the policies adopted during the reporting year (for example, new expectations for business customers, new or additional approaches to due diligence and remedy). |
AR 10. |
The policy may take the form of a stand-alone policy regarding consumer s and/or end-users or be included in a broader document such as a code of ethics or a general sustainability policy that has already been disclosed by the undertaking as part of another ESRS. In those cases, the undertaking shall provide an accurate cross-reference to identify the aspects of the policy that satisfy the requirements of this Disclosure Requirement. |
AR 11. |
In disclosing its alignment of its policies with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the undertaking shall consider that the Guiding Principles refer to the International Bill of Human Rights, which consists of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the two Covenants that implement it, and may disclose its alignment with these instruments. |
AR 12. |
When disclosing how external facing policies are embedded, the undertaking may, for example, consider internal-facing sales and distribution policies and alignment with other policies relevant to consumer s and/or end-users . The undertaking shall also consider its policies for safeguarding the veracity and usefulness of information provided to potential and actual consumers and/or end-users, both before and after sale. |
AR 13. |
The undertaking may provide an illustration of the types of communication of its policies to those individuals, group of individuals or entities for whom they are relevant, either because they are expected to implement them (for example, the undertaking’s employees , contractors and suppliers ), or because they have a direct interest in their implementation (for example, own workers, investors). It may disclose communication tools and channels (for example, flyers, newsletters, dedicated websites, social media, face to face interactions, workers’ representatives), aimed at ensuring that the policy is accessible and that different audiences understand its implications. The undertaking may also explain how it identifies and removes potential barriers for dissemination, such as through translation into relevant languages or the use of graphic depictions. |
Disclosure Requirement S4-2 – Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts
AR 14. |
Credible proxies who have knowledge of the interests, experiences or perspectives of consumers and end-users could include national consumer protection bodies for some consumers. |
AR 15. |
When describing which function or role has operational responsibility for such engagement and/or ultimate accountability, the undertaking may disclose whether this is a dedicated role or function or part of a broader role or function, and whether any capacity building activities have been offered to support the staff to undertake engagement. If it cannot identify such a position or function, it may state that this is the case. This disclosure could also be fulfilled by making reference to information disclosed according to ESRS 2 GOV-1 The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies. |
AR 16. |
When preparing the disclosures described in paragraph 20 b) and c), the following illustrations may be considered:
|
AR 17. |
To illustrate how the perspectives of consumers and/or end-users have informed specific decisions or activities of the undertaking, the undertaking may provide examples from the current reporting period. |
Disclosure Requirement S4-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns
AR 18. |
In fulfilling the requirements set out by the disclosure criteria of ESRS S4-3, the undertaking may be guided by the content of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises focused on remediation and grievance mechanisms. |
AR 19. |
Channels for raising concerns or needs, include grievance mechanisms, hotlines, dialogue processes or other means through which consumers and/or end-users or their legitimate representatives can raise concerns about impacts or explain needs that they would like the undertaking to address. This could include channels provided by the undertaking directly and is to be disclosed in addition to any other mechanisms the undertaking may use to gain insight into the management of impacts on consumers and/or end-users, such as compliance audits. Where the undertaking is relying solely on information about the existence of such channels provided by its business relationships to answer this requirement, it may state that. |
AR 20. |
To provide greater insight into the information covered in ESRS S4-3, the undertaking may provide insight into whether and how consumers and/or end-users that may be affected are able to access channels at the level of the undertaking they are affected by, in relation to each material impact. |
AR 21. |
Third party mechanisms could include those operated by the government, NGOs, industry associations and other collaborative initiatives. With regard to the scope of these mechanisms, the undertaking may disclose whether these are accessible to all consumer s and/or end-users who may be potentially or actually materially impacted by the undertaking, or individuals or organisations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of negative impacts, and through which consumers and/or end-users (or individuals or organisations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of negative impacts), can raise complaints or concerns related to the undertaking’s own activities. |
AR 22. |
In relation to the protection of individuals that use the mechanisms against the retaliation, the undertaking may describe whether it treats grievances confidentially and with respect to the rights of privacy and data protection; and whether they allow for consumer and/or end-users to use them anonymously (for example, through representation by a third party). |
AR 23. |
In disclosing whether and how the undertaking knows that consumer s and/or end-users are aware of and trust any of these channels, the undertaking may provide relevant and reliable data about the effectiveness of these channels from the perspective of consumers and/or end-users themselves. Examples of sources of information are surveys of consumers and/or end-users that have used such channels and their levels of satisfaction with the process and outcomes. To illustrate the usage level of such channels, the undertaking may disclose the number of complaints received from consumers and/or end-users during the reporting period. |
AR 24. |
In describing the effectiveness of channels for
consumer
s and/or
end-users
to raise concerns, the undertaking may be guided by the following questions, based on the “effectiveness criteria for nonjudicial
grievance mechanisms
”, as laid out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The below considerations may be applied on an individual channel basis or for the collective system of channels:
For more information, see Principle 31 of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. |
Disclosure Requirement S4-4 – Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end- users, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions
AR 25. |
It may take time to understand negative impacts and how the undertaking may be involved with them through its downstream value chain, as well as to identify appropriate responses and put them into practice). Therefore, the undertaking shall consider:
|
AR 26. |
Appropriate action can vary according to whether the undertaking causes or contributes to a material impact, or whether the material impact is directly linked to its own operations, products or services through a business relationship. |
AR 27. |
Given that material negative impacts affecting consumers and/or end-users that have occurred during the reporting period may also be linked to entities or operations outside its direct control, the undertaking may disclose whether and how it seeks to use leverage with relevant business relationships to manage those impacts. This may include using commercial leverage (for example, enforcing contractual requirements with business relationships or implementing incentives), other forms of leverage within the relationship (such as providing training or capacity-building on proper product use or sale practices to business relationships) or collaborative leverage with peers or other actors (such as initiatives aimed at responsible marketing or product safety). |
AR 28. |
When the undertaking discloses its participation in an industry or multi-stakeholder initiative as part of its actions to address material negative impacts, the undertaking may disclose how the initiative, and its own involvement, is aiming to address the material impact concerned. It may disclose under ESRS S4-5 the relevant targets set by the initiative and progress towards them. |
AR 29. |
When disclosing whether and how it considers actual and potential impacts on consumers and/or end-users in decisions to terminate business relationships and whether and how it seeks to address any negative impacts that may result from termination, the undertaking may include examples. |
AR 30. |
In disclosing how it tracks the effectiveness of actions to manage material impacts during the reporting period, the undertaking may disclose any lessons learned from the previous and current reporting periods. |
AR 31. |
Processes used to track the effectiveness of actions can include internal or external auditing or verification, court proceedings and/or related court decisions, impact assessments, measurement systems, stakeholder feedback, grievance mechanisms, external performance ratings, and benchmarking. |
AR 32. |
Reporting on effectiveness is aimed at enabling the understanding of the links between actions taken by the undertaking and the effective management of impacts. |
AR 33. |
With regard to initiatives or processes the undertaking has in place that are based on affected
consumers
and/or
end-users’
needs and their level of implementation, the undertaking may disclose:
|
AR 34. |
The undertaking may disclose whether any initiatives or processes whose primary aim is to deliver positive impacts for consumer s and/or end-users are designed to also support the achievement of one or more of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). For example, through a commitment to advance UN SDG 3 to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages” the undertaking may be actively working to make its products less addictive and harmful to physical and psychological health. |
AR 35. |
When disclosing the intended positive outcomes of its actions for consumers and/or end-users a distinction is to be made between evidence of certain activities having occurred (for example, that x number of consumers have received information about healthy eating habits) from evidence of actual outcomes for consumers and/or end-users (for example, that x number of consumers have adopted healthier eating habits). |
AR 36. |
When disclosing whether initiatives or processes also play a role in mitigating material negative impacts, the undertaking may, for example, consider programmes that aim to support heightened awareness of the risk of online scams, leading to a reduction in the number of cases of end-users experiencing breaches of data privacy. |
AR 37. |
When disclosing the material risks and opportunities related to the undertaking’s impacts or
dependencies
on
consumers
and/or
end-users
, the undertaking may consider the following:
|
AR 38. |
When disclosing whether dependencies turn into risks, the undertaking shall consider external developments. |
AR 39. |
When disclosing policies, action and resources and targets related to the management of material risks and opportunities, in cases where risks and opportunities arise from a material impact, the undertaking may cross-reference its disclosures on policies, action and resources and targets in relation to that impact. |
AR 40. |
The undertaking shall consider the extent to which its processes to manage material risks related to consumers and/or end-users are integrated into its existing risk management processes and how. |
AR 41. |
When disclosing the resources allocated to the management of material impacts, the undertaking may disclose which internal functions are involved in managing the impacts and what types of action they take to address negative and advance positive impacts. |
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement S4-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
AR 42. |
When disclosing
targets
in relation to
consumers
and/or
end-users
, the undertaking may disclose:
|
AR 43. |
Targets related to material risks and opportunities may be the same as or distinct from targets tied to material impacts . For example, a target to ensure equal access to finance for underserved consumers could both reduce discrimination impacts on those consumers and enlarge the undertaking’s pool of customers. |
AR 44. |
The undertaking may also distinguish between short, medium and long-term targets covering the same policy commitment. For example, the undertaking may have as a main objective to make its online services accessible to people with disabilities, with the long-term goal of having adapted 100% of its online services by 2025, and with the short-term objective of adding x number of accessible features every year up and until 2025. |
AR 45. |
When modifying or replacing a target in the reporting period, the undertaking may explain the change by cross-referencing it to significant changes in the business model or to broader changes in the accepted standard or legislation from which the target is derived to provide contextual information as per ESRS 2 BP-2 Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances. |
ESRS G1
BUSINESS CONDUCT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objective
Interaction with other ESRS
Disclosure Requirements
– |
ESRS 2 General disclosures |
Governance
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 GOV-1 – The role of the administrative, supervisory and management bodies |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement G1-1– Corporate culture and bBusiness conduct policies and corporate culture |
— |
Disclosure Requirement G1-2 – Management of relationships with suppliers |
— |
Disclosure Requirement G1-3 – Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement G1-4 – Confirmed incidents of corruption or bribery |
— |
Disclosure Requirement G1-5 – Political influence and lobbying activities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement G1-6 – Payment practices |
Appendix A: |
Application Requirements |
Impact, risk and opportunity management
— |
Disclosure Requirement G1-1 – Corporate culture and business conduct policies |
— |
Disclosure Requirement G1-2 – Management of relationships with suppliers |
— |
Disclosure Requirement G1-3 – Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery |
Metrics and targets
— |
Disclosure Requirement G1-5 – Political influence and lobbying activities |
— |
Disclosure Requirement G1-6 – Payment practices |
Objective
1. |
The objective of this Standard is to specify disclosure requirements which will enable users of the undertaking’s sustainability statements to understand the undertaking’s strategy and approach, processes and procedures as well as its performance in respect of business conduct. |
2. |
This Standard focusses on the following matters, collectively referred to in this Standard as ‘business conduct or business conduct matters’:
|
Interaction with other ESRS
3. |
The content of this Standard on general disclosures as well as impact, risk and opportunity management and metrics and targets shall be read in conjunction respectively with ESRS 1 General principles and ESRS 2 General requirements. |
Disclosure Requirements
ESRS 2 General disclosures
4. |
The requirements of this section should be read in conjunction with and reported alongside the disclosures required by ESRS 2 on Governance (GOV), Strategy (SBM) and Management of impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO). |
Governance
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 GOV-1 – The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
5. |
When disclosing information about the role of the
administrative, management and supervisory bodies
, the undertaking shall cover the following aspects:
|
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities
6. |
When describing the process to identify material impacts, risks and opportunities in relation to business conduct matters, the undertaking shall disclose all relevant criteria used in the process, including location, activity, sector and the structure of the transaction. |
Disclosure Requirement G1-1– Business conduct policies and corporate culture
7. |
The undertaking shall disclose its policies with respect to business conduct matters and how it fosters its corporate culture. |
8. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to business conduct matters. It also aims to provide an understanding of the undertaking’s approach to corporate culture . |
9. |
The disclosures required under paragraph 7 shall include how the undertaking establishes, develops, promotes and evaluates its corporate culture. |
10. |
The disclosures in paragraph 7 shall cover the following aspects related to the undertaking’s policies on business conduct matters:
|
11. |
Undertakings that are subject to legal requirements under national law transposing Directive (EU) 2019/1937, or to equivalent legal requirements with regard to the protection of whistle-blowers, may comply with the disclosure specified in paragraph 10 (d) by stating that they are subject to those legal requirements. |
Disclosure Requirement G1-2 – Management of relationships with suppliers
12. |
The undertaking shall provide information about the management of its relationships with its suppliers and its impacts on its supply chain. |
13. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the undertaking’s management of its procurement process including fair behaviour with suppliers . |
14. |
The undertaking shall provide a description of its policy to prevent late payments, specifically to SMEs. |
15. |
The disclosure required under paragraph 12 shall include the following information:
|
Disclosure Requirement G1-3 – Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery
16. |
The undertaking shall provide information about its system to prevent and detect, investigate, and respond to allegations or incidents relating to corruption and bribery including the related training. |
17. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide transparency on the key procedures of the undertaking to prevent, detect, and address allegations about corruption and bribery . This includes the training provided to own workers and/or information provided internally or to suppliers . |
18. |
The disclosure required under paragraph 16 shall include the following information:
|
19. |
Where the undertaking has no such procedures in place, it shall disclose this fact and, where applicable, its plans to adopt them. |
20. |
The disclosures required by paragraph 16 shall include information about how the undertaking communicates its policies to those for whom they are relevant to ensure that the policy is accessible and that they understand its implications. |
21. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 16 shall include information about the following with respect to training:
|
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement G1-4 – Incidents of corruption or bribery
22. |
The undertaking shall provide information on incidents of corruption or bribery during the reporting period. |
23. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide transparency on the incidents relating to corruption or bribery during the reporting period and the related outcomes. |
24. |
The undertaking shall disclose:
|
25. |
The undertaking may disclose:
|
26. |
The disclosures required shall include incidents involving actors in its value chain only where the undertaking or its employees are directly involved. |
Disclosure Requirement G1-5 – Political influence and lobbying activities
27. |
The undertaking shall provide information on the activities and commitments related to exerting its political influence, including its lobbying activities related to its material impacts, risks and opportunities. |
28. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide transparency on the undertaking’s activities and commitments related to exerting its political influence with political contributions, including the types and purpose of lobbying activities . |
29. |
The disclosure required by paragraph 27 shall include:
|
30. |
The disclosure shall also include information about the appointment of any members of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies who held a comparable position in public administration (including regulators) in the 2 years preceding such appointment in the current reporting period. |
Disclosure Requirement G1-6 – Payment practices
31. |
The undertaking shall provide information on its payment practices, especially with respect to late payments to small and medium enterprises (SMEs). |
32. |
The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide insights on the contractual payment terms and on its performance with regard to payment, especially as to how these impact SMEs and specifically with respect to late payments to SMEs. |
33. |
The disclosure under paragraph 31 shall include:
|
Appendix A
Application Requirements
This appendix is an integral part of the ESRS G1 Business conduct. It supports the application of the disclosure requirements set out in this standard and has the same authority as the other parts of the Standard.
Impact, risk and opportunity management
Disclosure Requirement G1-1 – Business conduct policies and corporate culture
AR 1. |
The undertaking may consider the following aspects when determining its disclosure under paragraph 7:
|
Disclosure Requirement G1-2 – Management of relationships with suppliers
AR 2. |
For purposes of this standard, management of relationships with the undertaking’s
suppliers
may include the following:
|
AR 3. |
'Vulnerable suppliers’ includes suppliers that are exposed to significant economic, environmental and/or social risks. |
Disclosure Requirement G1-3 – Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery
AR 4. |
‘Functions-at-risk’ means those functions deemed to be at risk of corruption and bribery as a result of its tasks and responsibilities. |
AR 5. |
Disclosures may include details about the risk assessments and/or mapping, as well as monitoring programmes and/or internal control procedures performed by the undertaking to detect corruption and bribery . |
AR 6. |
The undertaking’s policies on corruption and bribery may be relevant to specific groups of people, either because they are expected to implement them (for example, the undertaking’s employees , contractors and suppliers ), or because they have a direct interest in their implementation (for example, value chain workers, investors). The undertaking may disclose the communication tools and channels (e.g., flyers, newsletters, dedicated websites, social media, face to face interactions, unions and/or workers representatives) to communicate policies to such groups. This may also include the identification and/or removal of potential barriers to dissemination, such as through translation into relevant languages or the use of graphic depictions. |
AR 7. |
The undertaking may disclose an analysis of its training activities by, for example, region of training or category of own workforce where its programmes differ significantly based on such factors and such information would be useful to users. |
AR 8. |
The undertaking may present the required information about training using the following table:
Anti-corruption and bribery training illustrative example During the 20XY financial year ABC provided training to its at-risk own workers in terms of its policy (see note x). For those at-risk functions the training is mandatory, but ABC also made available voluntary training for other own workers. Details of its training during the year is as follows:
|
Metrics and targets
Disclosure Requirement G1-5 – Political influence and lobbying activities
AR 9. |
For purposes of this Standard ‘political contribution’ means financial or in-kind support provided directly to political parties, their elected representatives or persons seeking political office. Financial contributions can include donations, loans, sponsorships, advance payments for services, or the purchase of tickets for fundraising events and other similar practices. In-kind contributions can include advertising, use of facilities, design and printing, donation of equipment, provision of board membership, employment or consultancy work for elected politicians or candidates for office. |
AR 10. |
‘Indirect political contribution’ refers to those political contributions made through an intermediary organisation such as a lobbyist or charity, or support given to an organisation such as a think tank or trade association linked to or supporting particular political parties or causes. |
AR 11. |
When determining ‘comparable position’ in this standard, the undertaking shall consider various factors, including level of responsibility and scope of activities undertaken. |
AR 12. |
The undertaking may provide the following information on its financial or in-kind contributions with regard to its lobbying expenses:
|
AR 13. |
If the undertaking is legally obliged to be a member of a chamber of commerce or other organisation that represents its interests, it may disclose that this is the case. |
AR 14. |
In meeting the requirement in paragraph 29(c) the undertaking shall consider the alignment between its public statements on its material impacts, risks and opportunities and its lobbying activities. |
AR 15. |
An example of what such disclosures could look like:
Political engagement (including lobbying activities) illustrative example During the 20XY financial year ABC was involved in activities around the proposed regulation XXX which could have significant negative impacts on its business model if implemented in the current format. ABC’s considers that while the proposed regulation will realise some improvements to the regulatory regime such as xxx, in its current format the costs relating to xxx will outweigh the benefits. ABC and its peers continue to work with XXX (the regulator) to improve this balance. ABC also supported the QRP political party in Country X and EFG party in Country Y as both …. ABC is registered in its local transparency register, i.e., XYZ, and its registration number is 987234. Amounts in € thousands.
|
Disclosure Requirement G1-6 – Payment practices
AR 16. |
In some cases, the undertaking’s standard contractual payment terms may differ significantly depending on country or type of supplier . In such cases, information about the standard terms per main categories of suppliers or country or geographical region could be examples of additional contextual information to explain the disclosures in paragraph 33(b). |
AR 17. |
An example of what the description of standard contract term disclosures in paragraph 33(b) could look like:
ABC’s standard contract payment terms are payment on receipt of invoice for wholesalers which encompass approximately 80% of its annual invoices by value. It pays for services received within 30 days after receipt of the invoice which are about 5% of its annual invoices. The remainder of its invoices are paid within 60 days of receipt except for those in country X which in accordance with the marketplace standards are paid within 90 days of receipt. |
(1) Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19).
(2) Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15).
(3) UN Guiding Principle 16 and its commentary; UN Interpretive Guide, Questions 21 and 25 as well as OECD Guidelines Chapter II on General Policies (paragraph A.10), and chapter IV on Human Rights (paragraph 4; and paragraph 44 of the Commentary); and OECD Due Diligence Guidance, Section II (1.1 and 1.2) and Annex, Questions 14 and 15.
(4) UN Guiding Principle 18 and its Commentary, UN Guiding Principle 20, Commentary to UN Guiding Principles 21 and 29, and UN Guiding Principle 31(h) and its Commentary; and the UN Interpretive Guide, Questions 30, 33, 42 and 76 as well as OECD Guidelines Chapter II on General Policies (paragraph A.14 and paragraph 25 of the Commentary); and OECD Due Diligence Guidance, Section II (2.1.c, 2.3. 2.4.a, 3.1.b and 3.1.f) and Annex Questions 8- 11.
(5) UN Guiding Principles 17, 18 and 24 and their Commentaries, and the Commentary to UN Guiding Principle 29; and the UN Interpretive Guide, Questions 9, 12-13, 27-28, 36-42, and 85-89 and OECD Guidelines Chapter II on General Policies (paragraphs A.10-11 and paragraph 14 of the Commentary), and Chapter IV on Human Rights (paragraphs 1-2 and paragraphs 41-43 of the Commentary); and OECD Due Diligence Guidance, Section II (2.1- 2.4) and Annex Questions 3-5, and 19-31).
(6) UN Guiding Principles 19, 22 and 23 and their Commentaries; and the UN Interpretive Guide, Questions 11, 32, 46-47, 64-68 and 82-83 and OECD Guidelines Chapter II on General Policies (paragraphs A.12 and paragraphs 18-22 of the Commentary), and Chapter IV on Human Rights (paragraphs 3 and 42-43 of the Commentary); and OECD Due Diligence Guidance, Section II (3.1-3.2) and Annex Questions 32-40).
(7) UN Guiding Principles 20 and 31(g) and their Commentaries; and the UN Interpretive Guide, Questions 49-53 and 80 and OECD Due Diligence Guidance, Section II (4.1 and 5.1) and Annex Questions 41-47.
(8) Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (OJ L 198, 22.6.2020, p. 13).
(9) Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies (OJ L 184, 14.7.2007, p. 17).
(10) Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading on a regulated market, and repealing Directive 2003/71/EC (OJ L 168, 30.6.2017, p. 12).
(11) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).
(12) Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), repealing Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC (OJ L 342, 22.12.2009, p. 1).
(13) This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out by indicator #13 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 of 6 April 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Board gender diversity”) and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 of 17 July 2020 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as set out by indicator “Weighted average ratio of female to male board members” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.
(14) This information supports the information needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Weighted average percentage of board members who are independent” in section I of Annex II.
(15) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #10 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of due diligence”).
(16) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out by indicator #4 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Exposure to companies active in the fossil fuel sector”).
(17) Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1).
(18) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 of 6 July 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by specifying the content and presentation of information to be disclosed by undertakings subject to Articles 19a or 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU concerning environmentally sustainable economic activities, and specifying the methodology to comply with that disclosure obligation (OJ L 443, 10.12.2021, p. 9).
(19) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out by indicator #9 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies producing chemicals”).
(20) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out by indicator #14 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Exposure to controversial weapons (anti-personnel mines, cluster munitions, chemical weapons and biological weapons)”).
(21) This information supports the needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as set out by paragraph b) of article 12.1.
(22) Article 18, paragraph 1, sub-point (a) of Directive 2013/34/EU: “ the net turnover broken down by categories of activity and into geographical markets, in so far as those categories and markets differ substantially from one another, taking account of the manner in which the sale of products and the provision of services are organised.”
(23) Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (Sustainable Finance Disclosures Regulation) (OJ L 317, 9.12.2019, p. 1).
(24) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (Capital Requirements Regulation “CRR”) (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).
(25) Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds and amending Directives 2008/48/EC and 2014/17/EU and Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 (OJ L 171, 29.6.2016, p. 1).
(26) Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1).
(27) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 of 17 July 2020 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the explanation in the benchmark statement of how environmental, social and governance factors are reflected in each benchmark provided and published (OJ L 406, 3.12.2020, p. 1).
(28) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 of 30 November 2022 amending the implementing technical standards laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/637 as regards the disclosure of environmental, social and governance risks (OJ L 324,19.12.2022, p.1.).
(29) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 of 17 July 2020 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards minimum standards for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks (OJ L 406, 3.12.2020, p. 17).
(30) Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1).
(31) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 of 17 July 2020 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards minimum standards for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks (OJ L 406, 3.12.2020, p. 17).
(32) Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (Sustainable Finance Disclosures Regulation) (OJ L 317, 9.12.2019, p. 1).
(33) Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (OJ L 198, 22.6.2020, p. 13).
(34) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 of 30 November 2022 amending the implementing technical standards laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/637 as regards the disclosure of environmental, social and governance risks (OJ L 324,19.12.2022, p.1.).
(35) This information is aligned with the Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU Climate Law), Article 2 (1); and with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation), Article 2.
(36) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 of 4 June 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives (OJ L 442, 9.12.2021, p. 1).
(37) The CapEx amounts considered are related to the following NACE codes:
(a) |
B.05 Mining of coal and lignite, B.06 Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas (limited to crude petroleum), B.09.1 Support activities for petroleum and natural gas extraction (limited to crude petroleum), |
(b) |
C.19 Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products, |
(c) |
D.35.1 - Electric power generation, transmission and distribution, |
(d) |
D.35.3 - Steam and air conditioning supply (limited to coal-fired and oil-fired power and/or heat generation), |
(e) |
G.46.71 - Wholesale of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels and related products (limited to solid and liquid fuels). |
For gas-related activities, the NACE code definition addresses activities with direct GHG emissions that are higher than 270 gCO2/KWh.
(38) This disclosure requirement is included consistent with the requirements in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 template I climate change transition risk; and is aligned with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation), Articles 12.1 (d) to (g) and 12.2.
(39) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (SFDR) because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #4 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies without carbon emission reduction initiatives”); and is aligned with the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation), Article 6.
(40) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #5 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Share of non-renewable energy consumption and production”). The breakdown serves as a reference for an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #5 in Table II of the same Annex (“Breakdown of energy consumption by type of non-renewable sources of energy”).
(41) Compliant with the requirements in delegated acts for hydrogen from renewable sources: Commission Delegated Regulation of 10 February 2023 supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a Union methodology setting out detailed rules for the production of renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin; and Commission Delegated Regulation of 10 February 2023 supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a minimum threshold for greenhouse gas emissions savings of recycled carbon fuels and by specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin and from recycled carbon fuel.
(42) High climate impact sectors are those listed in NACE Sections A to H and Section L (as defined in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288).
(43) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #5 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Share of non-renewable energy consumption and production”).
(44) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #6 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Energy consumption intensity per high climate impact sector”).
(45) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicators #1 and #2 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“GHG emissions” and “Carbon footprint”). This information is aligned with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation), Articles 5 (1), 6 and 8 (1).
(46) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #3 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“GHG intensity of investee companies”). This information is aligned with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation), Article 8 (1).
(47) This information is aligned with Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU Climate Law), Article 2 (1).
(48) This information is aligned with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation).
(49) This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements included in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - Template 5: Banking book - Climate change physical risk: Exposures subject to physical risk.
(50) This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements included in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - Template 5: Banking book - Climate change physical risk: Exposures subject to physical risk.
(51) This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements included in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453- Template 2: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: Loans collateralised by immovable property - Energy efficiency of the collateral.
(52) This information is aligned with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation).
(53) Article 12.1 of the Climate Benchmark Standards Regulation states that “ Administrators of EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks shall exclude the following companies:
a) |
companies that derive 1% or more of their revenues from exploration, mining, extraction, distribution or refining of hard coal and lignite; or |
b) |
companies that derive 10% or more of their revenues from exploration, extraction, distribution or refining of oil fuels; or |
c) |
companies that derive 50% or more of their revenues from exploration, extraction, manufacturing or distribution of gaseous fuels; or |
d) |
companies that derive 50% or more of their revenues from electricity generation with a GHG intensity of more than 100 g CO2 e/KWh.” |
Article 12.2 states that “ Administrators of EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks shall exclude from those benchmarks any companies that are found or estimated by them or by external data providers to significantly harm one or more of the environmental objectives referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in accordance with the rules on estimations laid down in Article 13(2) of this Regulation.”.
(54) This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - template 1 climate change transition risk.
(55) Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 1).
(56) Compliant with the requirements in delegated acts for hydrogen from renewable sources: Commission delegated regulation of 10 February 2023 supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a Union methodology setting out detailed rules for the production of renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin; and Commission delegated regulation of 10 February 2023 supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a minimum threshold for greenhouse gas emissions savings of recycled carbon fuels and by specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin and from recycled carbon fuel.
(57) Based on Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources.
(58) Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 471, 30.12.2021, p. 1).
(59) This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - Template 5 exposures subjects to physical risk.
(60) This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - Template 5 exposures subjects to physical risk.
(61) Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (OJ L 153, 18.6.2010, p. 13).
(62) This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - Template 2 immovable property, energy efficiency of the collateral.
(63) The cost rate is the factor used to convert non-monetary impacts like tonnes, hectares, m3 etc. into monetary units. Cost rates should be based on monetary valuation studies, need to be science-based and the methods used to obtain them transparent. Guidance on these methods can be obtained, e.g., from the EU-LIFE-funded TRANSPARENT project.
(64) Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 January 2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC (OJ L 033 4.2.2006, p. 1)
(65) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from: (a) an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #2 in Table II of Annex of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Emissions of air pollutants”); (b) indicator #8 in Table I of Annex I (“Emissions to water); (c) indicator #1 in Table II of Annex I ( “Emissions of inorganic pollutants”); and (d) indicator #3 in Table II of Annex I (“Emissions of ozone- depleting substances”) .
(66) According to Eurostat, the Degree of urbanisation (DEGURBA) is a classification that indicates the character of an area. Based on the share of local population living in urban clusters and in urban centres, it classifies Local Administrative Units (LAU or communes) into three types of area: i) Cities (densely populated areas), ii) Towns and suburbs (intermediate density areas), and iii) Rural areas (thinly populated areas).
(67) Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17).
(68) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (Water Framework Directive) (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1).
(69) Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) (OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p. 19).
(70) Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning (OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 135).
(71) Source: IFC Performance Standard 6, 2012.
(72) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #7 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies without water management policies”).
(73) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #8 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Exposure to areas of high water stress”).
(74) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #12 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments ( “Investments in companies without sustainable oceans/seas practices”).
(75) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #6.2 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 regarding disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Water usage and recycling”, 2. Weighted average percentage of water recycled and reused by investee companies).
(76) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #6.1 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Water usage and recycling”, 1. Average amount of water consumed by the investee companies (in cubic meters) per million EUR of revenue of investee companies).
(77) EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030- Bringing nature back into our lives, COM/2020/380 final.
(78) Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds ( OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7) and Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7).
(79) Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) ( OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p. 19).
(80) This information supports the information needs of financial markets participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #7 in Table 1 Annex 1 of the related Delegated Regulation with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments ( “Activities negatively affecting biodiversity-sensitive areas”).
(81) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #10 in Table 2 of Annex 1 of the related Delegated Regulation with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Land degradation, desertification, soil sealing”).
(82) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #14 in Table 2 of Annex 1 of the related Delegated Regulation with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Natural species and protected areas”).
(83) Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 26, 28.1.2012, p. 1).
(84) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #11 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies without sustainable land/agriculture practices”).
(85) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #12 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies without sustainable oceans/seas practices”).
(86) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #15 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Deforestation”).
(87) As indicated in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and the European Red List published by the European Commission.
(88) The direct driver climate change is to be reported under ESRS E1 Climate Change and pollution under ESRS E2 Pollution.
(89) As proposed by Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/ 2026 of 19 December 2018 amending Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (OJ L 325, 20.12.2018, p. 18).
(90) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3).
(91) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #13 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Non-recycled waste ratio”).
(92) Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 48). This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #9 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Hazardous waste and radioactive waste ratio”).
(93) As established by Directive 2009/125/EC.Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (OJ L 285, 31.10.2009, p. 10).
(94) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from additional indicators related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #13 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Operations and suppliers at significant risk of incidents of forced or compulsory labour”).
(95) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from additional indicators related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #12 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Operations and suppliers at significant risk of incidents of child labour”).
(96) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #9 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of a human rights policy”).
(97) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments.
(98) This information supports the needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to companies without due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organisation Conventions 1 to 8” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.
(99) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings”).
(100) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #1 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies without workplace accident prevention policies”).
(101) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #5 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of grievance/complaints handling mechanisms related to employee matters).
(102) This information supports the information needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Weighted average ratio of accidents, injuries, fatalities” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II. This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #2 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Rate of accidents”) and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Weighted average ratio of accidents, injuries, fatalities” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.
(103) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #3 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities or illness”).
(104) This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #12 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Unadjusted gender pay gap”); and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Weighted average gender pay gap” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.
(105) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #8 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Excessive CEO pay ratio”).
(106) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #7 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Incidents of discrimination”).
(107) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory and additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #10 in Table I of Annex I and by indicator #14 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Violations of UNGC principles and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises” and “Number of identified cases of severe human rights issues and incidents”); and the information needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Number of benchmark constituents subject to social violations (absolute number and relative divided by all benchmark constituents), as referred to in international treaties and conventions, United Nations principles and, where applicable, national law” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.
(108) Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees (OJ L 122, 16.5.2009, p. 28).
(109) Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community - Joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on employee representation (OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 29).
(*1) Gender as specified by the employees themselves.
(110) Directive (EU) 2022/2041 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on adequate minimum wages in the European Union (OJ L 275, 25.10.2022, p. 33).
(111) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from additional indicators related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicators number 12 and number 13 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Operations and suppliers at significant risk of incidents of child labour” and “Operations and suppliers at significant risk of incidents of forced or compulsory labour”).
(112) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #9 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of a human rights policy”).
(113) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (’Lack of processes and compliance mechanisms to monitor compliance with UN Global Compact principles and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises’).
(114) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings”).
(115) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #4 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of a supplier code of conduct”).
(116) This information supports the needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to companies without due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organisation Conventions 1 to 8” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.
(117) This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #10 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments; and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicators “Number of benchmark constituents subject to social violations (absolute number and relative divided by all benchmark constituents), as referred to in international treaties and conventions, United Nations principles and, where applicable, national law” and “Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to companies without due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organisation Conventions 1 to 8” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.
(118) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #14 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Number of identified cases of severe human rights issues and incidents”).
(119) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #9 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of a human rights policy”).
(120) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of processes and compliance mechanisms to monitor compliance with UN Global Compact principles and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises”).
(121) This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #10 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Violations of UN Global Compact principles and Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises”); and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Number of benchmark constituents subject to social violations (absolute number and relative divided by all benchmark constituents), as referred to in international treaties and conventions, United Nations principles and, where applicable, national law” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.
(122) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #14 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Number of identified cases of severe human rights issues and incidents”).
(123) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #9 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of a human rights policy”).
(124) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments.
(125) This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #10 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Violations of UN Global Compact principles and Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises”); and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Number of benchmark constituents subject to social violations (absolute number and relative divided by all benchmark constituents), as referred to in international treaties and conventions, United Nations principles and, where applicable, national law” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.
(126) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #14 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Number of identified cases of severe human rights issues and incidents”).
(127) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #15 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of anti-corruption and anti-bribery policies”).
(128) Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law (OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 17).
(129) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #6 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Insufficient whistleblower protection”).
(130) This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out in indicator #17 of Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Number of convictions and amount of fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws”); and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Numbers of convictions and amount of fines for violations of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.
(131) This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out in in indicator #16 of Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Cases of insufficient action taken to address breaches of standards of anti-corruption and anti-bribery”).
(132) Administrative, management and supervisory bodies.
ANNEX II
ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY OF TERMS
This Annex presents all the acronyms found in the ESRS (Table 1) as well as all terms defined in the ESRS (Table 2).
Table 1
Acronyms
AMS |
Automated Measuring Systems |
AQI |
Air Quality Indices |
AR |
Application Requirements |
AWS |
Alliance for Water Stewardship |
BAT |
Best Available Technique |
BAT-AEL |
Best Available Technique-Associated Emission Level |
BAT-AEPL |
Best Available Technique-Associated Environmental Performance Level |
BREFs |
Best Available Techniques Reference Documents |
Btu |
British Thermal Units |
CapEx |
Capital Expenditure |
CBD |
Convention for Biological Diversity |
CDDA |
Common Database on Designated Areas |
CEN |
European Committee for Standardization |
CENELEC |
European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization |
CH4 |
Methane |
CICES |
Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services |
C02 |
Carbon Dioxide |
CRR |
Regulation (EU) 757/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) (Capital Requirements Regulation) |
DEGURBA |
Degree of Urbanisation |
DR BP-1 |
Disclosure Requirement - General basis for preparation of the sustainability statements |
DR BP-2 |
Disclosure Requirement - Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances |
DR GOV-1 |
Disclosure Requirement - The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies |
DR GOV-2 |
Disclosure Requirement - Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies |
DR GOV-3 |
Disclosure Requirement - Integration of sustainability- related performance in incentive schemes |
DR GOV-4 |
Disclosure Requirement - Statement on sustainability due diligence |
DR GOV-5 |
Disclosure Requirement - Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting |
DR SBM-1 |
Disclosure Requirement - Market position, strategy, business model(s) and value chain |
DR SBM-2 |
Disclosure Requirement - Interests and views of stakeholders |
DR SBM-3 |
Disclosure Requirement - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model(s) |
DR IRO-1 |
Disclosure Requirement - Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities |
DR IRO-2 |
Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statements |
DNSH |
Do No Significant Harm |
DR |
Disclosure Requirements |
EBA |
European Banking Authority |
EC |
European Commission |
EEA |
European Economic Area |
EFRAG |
European Financial Reporting Advisory Group |
EFRAG SRB |
European Financial Reporting Advisory Group Sustainability Reporting Board |
EIA |
Environmental Impact Assessment |
EMAS |
Eco-Management and Audit Scheme |
EPC |
Energy Performance Certificate |
E-PRTR |
European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register |
ESA |
European Supervisory Authorities |
ESMA |
European Securities and Markets Authority |
ESRS |
European Sustainability Reporting Standards |
ESRS 1 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard 1 General requirements |
ESRS 2 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard 2 General disclosures |
ESRS E1 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard E1 Climate change |
ESRS E2 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard E2 Pollution |
ESRS E3 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard E3 Water and marine resources |
ESRS E4 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems |
ESRS E5 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard E5 Resource use and circular economy |
ESRS G1 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard G1 Business conduct |
ESRS S1 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard S1 Own workforce |
ESRS S2 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard S2 Workers in the value chain |
ESRS S3 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard S3 Affected communities |
ESRS S4 |
European Sustainability Reporting Standard S4 Consumers & end-users |
EU |
European Union |
EU ETS |
European Union Emissions Trading System |
EWC |
European Works Council |
FPIC |
Free, Prior and Informed Consent |
FTE |
Full-time equivalent |
GAAP |
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles |
GHG |
Greenhouse Gas |
GJ |
Giga-Joules |
GRI |
Global Reporting Initiative |
GWP |
Global Warming Potential |
HFCs |
Hydrofluorocarbons |
IED |
Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) (Industrial Emissions Directive) |
IFC |
International Finance Corporation |
IFRS |
International Financial Reporting Standards |
ILO |
International Labour Organisation |
IPBES |
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services |
IPCC |
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |
ISEAL |
International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling Alliance |
ISO |
International Organization for Standardization |
ISSB |
International Sustainability Standards Board |
ITS |
Implementing Technical Standards |
IUCN |
International Union for Conservation of Nature |
KBA |
Key Biodiversity Areas |
Kg |
Kilogram |
lb |
Pounds |
LEAP |
Locate Evaluate Assess Prepare |
LGBTQI |
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex |
MDR |
Minimum Disclosure Requirement |
MWh |
Mega-Watt-hours |
N2O |
Nitrous Oxide |
NACE |
Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community |
NF3 |
Nitrogen trifluoride |
NGOs |
Non-Governmental Organisations |
NH3 |
Ammonia |
NOX |
Nitrogen oxides |
NUTS |
Nomenclature of Territorial Units of Statistics |
O3 |
Ozone |
ODS |
Ozone-depleting substance |
OECD |
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development |
OECM |
One Earth Climate Model |
OpEX |
Operating Expenditure |
PBTS |
Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances |
PCAF |
Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financial |
PCFs |
Perfluorocarbons |
PM |
Particulate Matter |
PMTs |
Persistent, Mobile and Toxic Substances |
POPs |
Persistent organic pollutants |
REACH |
Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals |
SBTi |
Science Based Targets Initiative |
SBTN |
Science Based Targets Network |
SCE |
Societas Cooperativa Europaea |
SDA |
Sectoral Decarbonisation Approach |
SDGs |
Sustainable Development Goals |
SDPI |
Sustainable Development Performance Indicator |
SE |
Societas Europaea |
SEEA |
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting |
SEEA EA |
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounting |
SFDR |
Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) (Sustainable Finance Disclosures Regulation) |
SOX |
Sulphur oxides |
SVHC |
Substances of Very High Concern |
TCFD |
Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures |
TNFD |
Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures |
UN |
United Nations |
UNEP |
United Nations Environment Programme |
UNESCO |
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization |
vPvBs |
Very persistent and very bioaccumulative substances |
vPvMs |
Very persistent and very mobile substances |
WDPA |
World Database of Protected Areas |
WRI |
World Resources Institute |
WWF |
World-Wide Fund for Nature |
Table 2
Terms defined in the ESRS
This table defines the terms to be used as reference for the preparation of the sustainability statements in accordance with the ESRS.
Defined term |
Definition |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actions |
Actions refer to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actor in the value chain |
Individuals or entities in the upstream or downstream value chain . The actor is considered downstream from the undertaking (e.g., distributors, customers) when it receives products or services from the undertaking; it is considered upstream from the undertaking (e.g., suppliers ) when it provides products or services that are used in the production of the undertaking’s own products or services. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adequate wage |
A wage that provides for the satisfaction of the needs of the worker and his / her family in the light of national economic and social conditions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Administrative, management and supervisory bodies |
The governance bodies with the highest decision-making authority in the undertaking including its committees. If in the governance structure, there are no members of the administrative, management or supervisory bodies of the undertaking, the CEO, and if such function exists, the deputy CEO, should be included. In some jurisdictions, governance systems consist of two tiers, where supervision and management are separated. In such cases, both tiers are included under the definition of administrative, management and supervisory bodies . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Affected Communities |
People or group(s) living or working in the same area that have been or may be affected by a reporting undertaking’s operations or through its upstream and downstream value chain . Affected communities can range from those living adjacent to the undertaking’s operations (local communities) to those living at a distance. Affected communities include actually and potentially affected indigenous peoples . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual total remuneration |
Annual total remuneration to own workforce includes salary, bonus, stock awards, option awards, non-equity incentive plan compensation, change in pension value, and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings provided over the course of a year. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anticipated financial effects |
Financial effects that do not meet the recognition criteria for inclusion in the financial statement line items in the reporting period and that are not captured by the current financial effects . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Area at water risk |
A water catchment, where several physical aspects related to water:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Area of high-water stress |
Regions where the percentage of total water withdrawn is high (40-80%) or extremely high (greater than 80%) in the Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas tool of the World Resources Institute (WRI). See also water scarcity . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Associated process materials |
Materials that are needed for the manufacturing process but are not part of the final product, such as lubricants for manufacturing machinery. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Best Available Techniques (BAT) conclusions |
A document containing the parts of a BAT reference document laying down the conclusions on best available techniques , their description, information to assess their applicability, the emission levels associated with the best available techniques , the environmental performance levels associated with the best available techniques , the minimum content of an environmental management system including benchmarks associated with the best available techniques , associated monitoring, associated consumption levels and, where appropriate, relevant site remediation measures (5). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Best Available Technique-Associated Emission Level (BAT-AEL) |
The range of emission levels obtained under normal operating conditions using a best available technique or a combination of best available techniques , as described in BAT conclusions , expressed as an average over a given period of time, under specified reference conditions, i.e., the emission level that is associated with a BAT . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Best Available Technique-Associated Environmental Performance Level (BAT-AEPL) |
The range of environmental performance levels, except emission levels, obtained under normal operating conditions using a BAT or a combination of BAT s (6). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Best Available Techniques (BAT) (7) |
The most effective and advanced stage in the development of activities and their methods of operation which indicates the practical suitability of particular techniques for providing the basis for emission limit values and other permit conditions designed to prevent and, where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions and the impact on the environment as a whole:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biodiversity loss |
The reduction of any aspect of biological diversity (i.e., diversity at the genetic, species and ecosystem levels) in a particular area through death (including extinction), destruction or physicalmanual removal; it can refer to many scales, from global extinctions to population extinctions, resulting in decreased total diversity at the same scale. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biodiversity or biological diversity |
The variability among living organisms from all sources including terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are a part. This includes variation in genetic, phenotypic, phylogenetic, and functional attributes, as well as changes in abundance and distribution over time and space within and among species, biological communities and ecosystems . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biodiversity sensitive area |
Natura 2000 network of protected areas , UNESCO World Heritage sites and Key Biodiversity Areas (‘KBAs’), as well as other protected areas , as referred to in Appendix D of Annex II to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 (8). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biosphere integrity or ecological integrity |
The ability of an ecosystem to support and maintain ecological processes and a diverse community of organisms. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue economy |
The blue economy encompasses all industries and sectors related to oceans, seas and coasts, whether they are based in the marine environment (e.g., shipping, fisheries, energy generation) or on land (e.g. ports, shipyards, land-based aquaculture and algae production, coastal tourism). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BREF or EU Best Available Techniques reference documents |
A document resulting from the exchange of information organised pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (9) on industrial emissions , drawn up for defined activities and describing, in particular, applied techniques, present emissions and consumption levels, techniques considered for the determination of best available techniques as well as BAT conclusions and any emerging techniques, giving special consideration to the criteria listed in Annex III of Directive 2010/75/EU. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bribery |
Dishonestly persuading someone to act in your favour by giving them a gift of money or another inducement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business model |
The undertaking’s system of transforming inputs through its activities into outputs and outcomes that aims to fulfil the undertaking’s strategic purposes and create value over the short-, medium- and long-term. ESRS use the term “ business model ” in the singular, although it is recognised that undertakings may have more than one business model. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business relationships |
The relationships the undertaking has with business partners, entities in its value chain , and any other non-State or State entity directly linked to its business operations, products or services. Business relationships are not limited to direct contractual relationships. They include indirect business relationships in the undertaking’s value chain beyond the first tier, and shareholding positions in joint ventures or investments. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
By-product |
A substance or object resulting from a production process the primary aim of which is not the production of that substance or object is considered not to be waste , but to be a by-product if the following conditions are met:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carbon credit |
A transferable or tradable instrument that represents one metric tonne of CO2eq emission reduction or removal and is issued and verified according to recognised quality standards. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent (eq) |
The universal unit of measurement to indicate the global warming potential ( GWP ) of each greenhouse gas, expressed in terms of the GWP of one unit of carbon dioxide. It is used to evaluate releasing (or avoiding releasing) different greenhouse gases on a common basis. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Child labour |
Work that deprives children of their childhood, their potential and their dignity, and that is harmful to physical and mental development. It refers to work that:
A child is defined as a person under the age of 18. Whether or not particular forms of ‘work’ can be called ‘ child labour’ depends on the child’s age, the type and hours of work performed and the conditions under which it is performed. The answer varies from country to country, as well as among sectors within countries. The minimum age of work should not be less than the minimum age of completion of compulsory schooling, and, in any case, should not be less than 15 years according to International Labour Organisation (ILO) Convention No. 138 on Minimum Age. Exceptions can occur in certain countries where economies and educational facilities are insufficiently developed, and a minimum age of 14 years applies. These countries of exception are specified by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) in response to a special application by the country concerned and in consultation with representative organisations of employers and workers. National laws may permit the employment of persons 13 to 15 years of age in light work as long as it is not likely to be harmful to their health or development and does not prejudice their attendance at school or participation in vocational or training programmes. The minimum age for admission into work which by its nature or the circumstances in which it is carried out is likely to jeopardise the health, safety or morals of young persons shall not be less than 18 years. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Circular economy |
An economic system in which the value of products, materials and other resources in the economy is maintained for as long as possible, enhancing their efficient use in production and consumption, thereby reducing the environmental impact of their use, minimising waste and the release of hazardous substances at all stages of their life cycle, including through the application of the waste hierarchy . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Circular economy principles |
The European circular economy principles are:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Circular material use rate |
Recirculation of materials, components and products in practice after first use employing the following strategies (in order of preference):
The use rate is defined as the ratio of circular use of materials to overall use of materials. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Classified information |
EU classified information as defined in Council Decision 2013/488/EU (10) on the security rules for protecting EU classified information or classified by one of the Member States and marked as per Appendix B of that Council decision. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Climate change adaptation |
The process of adjustment to actual and expected climate change and its impacts . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Climate change mitigation |
The process of reducing GHG emissions and holding the increase in the global average temperature to 1,5 °C above pre-industrial levels, in line with the Paris Agreement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Climate resilience |
The capacity of an undertaking to adjust to climate changes, and to developments or uncertainties related to climate change. Climate resilience involves the capacity to manage climate-related Scope 1 and benefit from climate-related opportunities , including the ability to respond and adapt to transition risks and physical risks . An undertaking’s climate resilience includes both its strategic resilience and its operational resilience to climate-related changes, developments or uncertainties associated with climate change. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Climate-related opportunity |
Potential positive effects related to climate change for the undertaking. Efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change can produce opportunities for undertakings. Climate-related opportunities will vary depending on the region, market, and industry where an undertaking operates. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Climate-related physical risk (Physical risk from climate change) |
Risks resulting from climate change that can be event-driven (acute) or from longer-term shifts (chronic) in climate patterns. Acute physical risks arise from particular hazards, especially weather-related events such as storms, floods, fires or heatwaves. Chronic physical risks arise from longer-term changes in the climate, such as temperature changes, and their effects on rising sea levels, reduced water availability, biodiversity loss and changes in land and soil productivity. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Climate-related transition risk |
Risks that arise from the transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy. They typically include policy risks , legal risks , technology risks , market risks and reputational risks . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collective bargaining |
All negotiations which take place between an employer, a group of employers or one or more employers' organisations, on the one hand, and one or more trade unions or, in their absence, the representatives of the workers duly elected and authorised by them in accordance with national laws and regulations, on the other, for:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confirmed incident (child or forced labour or human trafficking) |
Incident of child or forced labour or human trafficking that has been found to be substantiated. Confirmed incidents do not include incidents of child or forced labour or human trafficking that are still under investigation in the reporting period. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confirmed incident of corruption or bribery |
An incident of corruption or bribery that has been found to be substantiated. Confirmed incidents of corruption or bribery do not include incidents of corruption or bribery that are still under investigation at the end of the reporting period. The determination of potential non-compliance cases as substantiated may be made either by the undertaking’s compliance officer or similar function or an authority. A determination as substantiated by a court of law is not required. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
Individuals who acquire, consume or use goods and services for personal use, either for themselves or for others, and not for resale, commercial or trade, business, craft or profession purposes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate culture |
Corporate culture expresses goals through values and beliefs. It guides the undertaking’s activities through shared assumptions and group norms such as values or mission statements or a code of conduct. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corruption |
Abuse of entrusted power for private gain, which can be instigated by individuals or organisations. It includes practices such as facilitation payments, fraud, extortion, collusion, and money laundering. It also includes an offer or receipt of any gift, loan, fee, reward, or other advantage to or from any person as an inducement to do something that is dishonest, illegal, or a breach of trust in the conduct of the undertaking’s business. This can include cash or in-kind benefits, such as free goods, gifts, and holidays, or special personal services provided for the purpose of an improper advantage, or that can result in moral pressure to receive such an advantage. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credible proxies |
Individuals with sufficiently deep experience in engaging with affected stakeholders from a particular region or context (for example, women workers on farms, indigenous peoples or migrant workers) who can help to effectively convey their likely concerns. In practice, this can include development and human rights NGOs, international trade unions and local civil society, including faith-based organisations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current financial effects |
Financial effects for the current reporting period that are recognised in the primary financial statements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decarbonisation levers |
Aggregated types of mitigation actions such as energy efficiency, electrification, fuel switching, use of renewable energy , products change, and supply-chain decarbonisation that fit with undertakings' specific actions . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deforestation |
Temporary or permanent human-induced conversion of forested land to non-forested land (11). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Degradation or degraded ecosystem |
Chronic human impacts resulting in the loss of biodiversity and the disruption of an ecosystem ’s structure, composition, and functionality. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dependencies |
The situation of an undertaking being dependent on natural, human and/or social resources for its business processes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposit in water and soil |
An amount of a substance that has accumulated in the environment, either in water or in soil , and either as a consequence of regular activities or from incidents or from disposals of undertakings, independent of whether that accumulation occurs at the production site of an undertaking or outside. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Desertification |
Land degradation in arid, semi-arid and dry sub-humid areas resulting from various factors, including climatic variations and human activities. Desertification does not refer to the natural expansion of existing deserts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discharge |
Wastewater discharge means the amount of water (in m3) or substance (in kg BOD/d or comparable) added / leached to a water body from a point or a non-point source. Sewage effluent (or discharge ) means treated sewage discharged from a sewage treatment plant. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discrimination |
Discrimination can occur directly or indirectly. Direct discrimination occurs when an individual is treated less favourably by comparison to how others, who are in a similar situation, have been or would be treated, and the reason for this is a particular characteristic they hold, which falls under a ‘protected ground’. Indirect discrimination occurs when an apparently neutral rule disadvantages a person or a group sharing the same characteristics. It must be shown that a group is disadvantaged by a decision when compared to a comparator group. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Double materiality |
Double materiality has two dimensions: impact materiality and financial materiality . A sustainability matter meets the criterion of double materiality if it is material from the impact perspective or the financial perspective or both. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Durability of a product, component or material |
The ability of a product, component or material to remain functional and relevant when used as intended. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ecological threshold |
The point at which a relatively small change in external conditions causes a rapid change in an ecosystem . When an ecological threshold has been passed, the ecosystem may no longer be able to return to its state by means of its inherent resilience. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ecosystem extent |
The size of an ecosystem asset, whereas an ecosystem asset is the contiguous space of a specific ecosystem type characterised by a distinct set of biotic and abiotic components and their interactions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ecosystem restoration |
Any intentional activities that initiate or accelerate the recovery of an ecosystem from a degraded state. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ecosystem services |
The contributions of ecosystems to the benefits that are used in economic and other human activity, respectively the benefits people obtain from ecosystems . In the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ecosystem services can be divided into supporting, regulating, provisioning and cultural. The Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) classifies types of ecosystems services. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ecosystem(s) |
A dynamic complex of plant, animal and micro-organism communities and their non-living environment interacting as a functional unit. A typology of ecosystems is provided by the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Emission |
The direct or indirect release of substances , vibrations, heat or noise from individual or diffuse sources into air, water or soil (12). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee |
An individual who is in an employment relationship with the undertaking according to national law or practice. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End-users |
Individuals who ultimately use or are intended to ultimately use a particular product or service. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equal opportunities |
Equal and non-discriminatory access, among individuals, to opportunities for education, training, employment, career development and the exercise of power without their being disadvantaged on the basis of criteria such as gender, racial or ethnic origin, nationality, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equal treatment |
The principle of equal treatment is a general principle of European law which presupposes that comparable situations or parties in comparable situations are treated in the same way. In the context of ESRS S1, the term “ equal treatment ” also refers to the principle of non-discrimination, according to which there shall be no direct or indirect discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial effects |
Effects from risks and opportunities that affect the undertaking’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows over the short, medium or long term. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial materiality |
A sustainability matter is material from a financial perspective if it generates risks or opportunities that affect (or could reasonably be expected to affect) the undertaking’s financial position, financial performance, cash flows, access to finance or cost of capital over the short, medium or long term. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forced labour |
All work or service which is exacted from any person under the threat of penalty and for which the person has not offered himself or herself voluntarily. The term encompasses all situations in which persons are coerced by any means to perform work and includes both traditional ‘slave-like’ practices and contemporary forms of coercion where labour exploitation is involved, which may include human trafficking and modern slavery. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fossil fuel |
Non-renewable carbon-based energy sources such as solid fuels, natural gas and oil. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) |
A manifestation of indigenous peoples ’ right to self-determine their political, social, economic and cultural priorities. It constitutes three interrelated and cumulative rights of indigenous peoples : the right to be consulted; the right to participate; and the right to their lands, territories and resources. FPIC pertains to indigenous peoples and is recognized under international human rights law, notably the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freshwater |
Groundwater and surface water, with a mean annual salinity of < 0,5 ‰ (i.e., the limit mentioned in Annex II of the Water Framework Directive). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GHG emission reduction |
Decrease in the undertaking’s Scope 1, 2, 3 or total GHG emissions at the end of the reporting period, relative to emissions in the base year. Emission reductions may result from, among others, energy efficiency, electrification, suppliers ' decarbonisation, electricity mix decarbonisation, sustainable products development or changes in reporting boundaries or activities (e.g., outsourcing, reduced capacities), provided they are achieved within the undertaking's own operations and upstream and downstream value chain . Removals and avoided emissions are not counted as emission reductions . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GHG removal and storage |
(Anthropogenic) removals refer to the withdrawal of GHGs from the atmosphere as a result of deliberate human activities. These include enhancing biological anthropogenic sinks of CO2 and using chemical engineering to achieve long-term removal and storage. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) from industrial and energy-related sources, which alone does not remove CO2 from the atmosphere, can remove atmospheric CO2 if it is combined with bioenergy production (Bioenergy with Carbon Capture & Storage - BECCS). Removals can be subject to reversals, which are any movement of stored GHG out of the intended storage that re-enters the atmosphere. For example, if a forest that was grown to remove a specific amount of CO2 is subject to a wildfire, the emissions captured in the trees are reversed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global warming potential (GWP) |
A factor describing the radiative forcing impact (degree of harm to the atmosphere) of one unit of a given GHG relative to one unit of CO2. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greenhouse Gases (GHG) |
The gases listed in Part 2 of Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council (13). These include Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), Nitrous Oxide (N2O), Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Perfluorocarbons (PFCs). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grievance mechanism |
Any routinized, state-based or non-state-based, judicial or non-judicial processes through which stakeholders can raise grievances and seek remedy . Examples of state-based judicial and non-judicial grievance mechanisms include courts, labour tribunals, national human rights institutions, National Contact Points under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, ombudsperson offices, consumer protection agencies, regulatory oversight bodies, and government-run complaints offices. Non-state-based grievance mechanisms include those administered by the undertaking, either alone or together with stakeholders , such as operational-level grievance mechanisms and collective bargaining , including the mechanisms established by collective bargaining . They also include mechanisms administered by industry associations, international organisations, civil society organisations, or multi-stakeholder groups. Operational-level grievance mechanisms are administered by the organisation either alone or in collaboration with other parties and are directly accessible by the organisation’s stakeholders . They allow for grievances to be identified and addressed early and directly, thereby preventing both harm and grievances from escalating. They also provide important feedback on the effectiveness of the organisation’s due diligence from those who are directly affected. According to UN Guiding Principle 31, effective grievance mechanisms are legitimate, accessible, predictable, equitable, transparent, rights-compatible, and a source of continuous learning. In addition to these criteria, effective operational-level grievance mechanisms are also based on engagement and dialogue. It can be more difficult for the organisation to assess the effectiveness of grievance mechanisms that it participates in compared to those it has established itself. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Groundwater |
All water which is below the surface of the ground in the saturation zone and in direct contact with the ground or subsoil (14). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Habitat |
The place or type of site where an organism or population naturally occurs. Also used to mean the environmental attributes required by a particular species or its ecological niche. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Habitat fragmentation |
A general term describing the set of processes by which habitat loss results in the division of continuous habitats into a greater number of smaller patches of lesser total size and isolated from each other by a matrix of dissimilar habitats . Habitat fragmentation may occur through natural processes (e.g., forest and grassland fires, flooding) and through human activities (forestry, agriculture, urbanisation). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harassment |
A situation where an unwanted conduct related to a protected ground of discrimination (for example, gender under Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (15), or religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation under Council Directive 2000/78/EC (16)) occurs with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person, and of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hazardous waste |
Waste which displays one or more of the hazardous properties listed in Annex III of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (17) on waste . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High climate impact sectors |
Sectors that are listed in Sections A to H and Section L of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (18) (as defined in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 (19)). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impacts |
The effect the undertaking has or could have on the environment and people, including effects on their human rights, connected with its own operations and upstream and downstream value chain , including through its products and services, as well as through its business relationships . The impacts can be actual or potential, negative or positive, intended or unintended, and reversible or irreversible. They can arise over the short-, medium-, or long-term. Impacts indicate the undertaking’s contribution, negative or positive, to sustainable development. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact drivers |
All the factors that cause changes in nature, anthropogenic assets, nature’s contributions to people and a good quality of life. Direct drivers of change can be both natural and anthropogenic. They have direct physical (mechanical, chemical, noise, light etc.) and behaviour-affecting impacts on nature. They include, inter alia, climate change, pollution , different types of land use change, invasive alien species and zoonoses, and exploitation. Indirect impact drivers operate diffusely by altering and influencing direct drivers (by affecting their level, direction or rate) as well as other indirect drivers. Interactions between indirect and direct drivers create different chains of relationship, attribution, and impacts , which may vary according to type, intensity, duration, and distance. These relationships can also lead to different types of spill-over effects. Global indirect drivers include economic, demographic, governance, technological and cultural ones. Special attention is given, among indirect drivers, to the role of institutions (both formal and informal) and impacts of the patterns of production, supply and consumption on nature, nature’s contributions to people and good quality of life. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact materiality |
A sustainability matter is material from an impact perspective when it pertains to the undertaking’s material actual or potential, positive or negative impacts on people or the environment over the short-, medium- and long-term. A material sustainability matter from an impact perspective includes impacts connected with the undertaking’s own operations and upstream and downstream value chain , including through its products and services, as well as through its business relationships . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incident |
A legal action or complaint registered with the undertaking or competent authorities through a formal process, or an instance of non-compliance identified by the undertaking through established procedures. Established procedures to identify instances of non-compliance can include management system audits, formal monitoring programs, or grievance mechanisms . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incineration |
The controlled burning of waste at high temperature with or without energy recovery. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Independent board member |
Board members that exercise independent judgment free from any external influence or conflicts of interest. Independence generally means the exercise of objective, unfettered judgement. When used as the measure by which to judge the appearance of independence, or to categorise a non-executive member of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies or their committees as independent, it means the absence of an interest, position, association or relationship which, when judged from the perspective of a reasonable and informed third party, is likely to influence unduly or cause bias in decision-making. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indigenous peoples |
There is no single definition for indigenous peoples agreed on at the international level. In practice, there is convergence among international agencies on what groups can be considered indigenous peoples and should enjoy special protection as such. An important criteria for defining indigenous people is related to their connection to a traditional area, as defined in ILO Convention No. 169, Article 1, which states that the convention applies to: “(a) tribal peoples in independent countries whose social, cultural and economic conditions distinguish them from other sections of the national community, and whose status is regulated wholly or partially by their own customs or traditions or by special laws or regulations; (b) peoples in independent countries who are regarded as indigenous on account of their descent from the populations which inhabited the country, or a geographical region to which the country belongs, at the time of conquest or colonisation or the establishment of present state boundaries and who, irrespective of their legal status, retain some or all of their own social, economic, cultural and political institutions”. ILO Convention 169 also states in Article 1(2) that: “[s]elf-identification as indigenous or tribal shall be regarded as a fundamental criterion for determining the groups to which the provisions of this Convention apply”. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indirect GHG emissions |
GHG emissions that are a consequence of the activities of an entity but occur at sources owned or controlled by another entity. Indirect emissions are Scope 2 GHG emissions and scope 3 GHG emissions combined. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Installation |
A stationary technical unit within which one or more activities are carried out which could have an effect on emissions and pollution . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Internal carbon price |
Price used by an undertaking to assess the financial implications of changes to investment, production, and consumption patterns, and of potential technological progress and future emissions abatement costs. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Internal carbon pricing scheme |
An organisational arrangement that allows an undertaking to apply carbon prices in strategic and operational decision making. There are two types of internal carbon prices commonly used by undertakings. The first type is a shadow price, which is a theoretical cost or notional amount that the undertaking does not charge but that can be used in assessing the economic implications or trade-offs for such things as risk impacts , new investments, net present value of projects, and the cost-benefit of various initiatives. The second type is an internal tax or fee, which is a carbon price charged to a business activity, product line, or other business unit based on its GHG emissions (these internal taxes or fees are similar to intracompany transfer pricing). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Invasive or alien species |
Species whose introduction and/or spread by human action outside their natural distribution threatens biological diversity , food security, and human health and well-being. “Alien’ refers to the species’ having been introduced outside its natural distribution (“exotic’, “non-native’ and “non-indigenous’ are synonyms for “alien’). “Invasive’ means “tending to expand into and modify ecosystems to which it has been introduced’. Thus, a species may be alien without being invasive, or, in the case of a species native to a region, it may increase and become invasive, without actually being an alien species. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) |
Sites contributing significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity ’, in terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems . Sites qualify as global KBAs if they meet one or more of 11 criteria, clustered into five categories: threatened biodiversity ; geographically restricted biodiversity ; ecological integrity ; biological processes; and, irreplaceability. The World Database of KBAs is managed by BirdLife International on behalf of the KBA Partnership. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land degradation |
The many processes that drive the decline or loss in biodiversity , ecosystem functions or their benefits to people and includes the degradation of all terrestrial ecosystems . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Landfill |
A waste disposal site for the deposit of the waste onto or into land (20). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land-system (change) |
The terrestrial component of the Earth system, encompassing all processes and activities related to the human use of land. These include socio-economic, technological and organisational inputs and arrangements, as well as the benefits gained from land and the unintended social and ecological outcomes of societal activities. The land-systems concept combines land-use (the activities, arrangements and inputs associated with land-use) with land cover (the ensemble of physical characteristics of land discernible by Earth Observation). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land-use (change) |
The human use of a specific area for a certain purpose (such as residential; agriculture; recreation; industrial, etc.). Influenced by, but not synonymous with, land cover. Land-use change refers to a change in the use or management of land by humans, which may lead to a change in land cover. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legitimate representatives |
Individuals recognised as legitimate under law or practice, such as elected trade union representatives in the case of workers, or other similarly freely chosen representatives of affected stakeholders . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leverage |
The ability of the undertaking to effect a change in the wrongful practices of another party that is connected with a negative sustainability-related impact. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lobbying activities |
Activities carried out with the objective of influencing the formulation or implementation of policy or legislation, or the decision-making processes of governments, governmental institutions, regulators, European Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies or standard setters. Such activities include (non-exhaustive list):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Locked-in GHG emissions |
Estimates of future GHG emissions that are likely to be caused by an undertaking’s key assets or products sold within their operating lifetime. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Longevity |
Designed for maintenance and durability in such a way that encourages longer use than the industry standard in practice and at scale and in such a way that does not compromise circular treatment at the end of functional life. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marine resources |
Biological and non-biological resources found in the seas and oceans. Examples include but are not limited to deep sea minerals, gravels, and seafood products |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Material opportunities |
Sustainability related opportunities with positive financial effects that materially affect, (or could reasonably be expected to affect) the undertaking’s cash flows, access to finance, or cost of capital over the short, medium or long term. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Material risks |
Sustainability related risks with negative financial effects that materially affect (or could reasonably be expected to affect) the undertaking’s cash flows, access to finance, or cost of capital over the short, medium or long term. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Materiality |
A sustainability matter is material if it meets the definition of impact materiality , financial materiality , or both. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metrics |
Qualitative and quantitative indicators that the undertaking uses to measure and report on the effectiveness of the delivery of its sustainability-related policies and against its targets over time. Metrics also support the measurement of the undertaking’s results in respect of affected people, the environment and the undertaking. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Microplastics |
Small pieces of plastics, usually smaller than 5mm. A growing volume of microplastics is found in the environment, including the sea, and in food and drinking water. Once in the environment, microplastics do not biodegrade and tend to accumulate, unless they are specifically designed to biodegrade in the open environment. Biodegradability is a complex phenomenon, especially in the marine environment. There are increasing concerns about the presence of microplastics in different environment compartments (such as water), their impact on the environment and potentially human health. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum Disclosure Requirement |
A minimum disclosure requirement sets the required content of the information that the undertaking includes when it reports on policies, actions , metrics or targets , either pursuant to a Disclosure Requirement in an ESRS or on an entity-specific basis. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural resources |
Natural assets ( raw materials ) occurring in nature that can be used for economic production or consumption. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nature-based solutions |
Actions to protect, conserve, restore, sustainably use and manage natural or modified terrestrial, freshwater , coastal and marine ecosystems which address social, economic and environmental challenges effectively and adaptively, while simultaneously providing human well-being, ecosystem services , resilience and biodiversity benefits. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net-zero target |
Setting a net-zero target at the level of an undertaking aligned with meeting societal climate goals means:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-employees |
Non-employees in an undertaking’s own workforce include both individual contractors supplying labour to the undertaking (“self-employed people”) and people provided by undertakings primarily engaged in “employment activities” (NACE Code N78). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-renewable energy |
Energy which cannot be identified as being derived from renewable sources. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operational control |
Operational control (over an entity, site , operation or asset) is the situation where the undertaking has the ability to direct the operational activities and relationships of the entity, site , operation or asset. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opportunities |
Sustainability-related opportunities with positive financial effects. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overtime |
The number of hours actually worked by a worker in excess of his or her contractual hours of work. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Own workforce/own workers |
Employees who are in an employment relationship with the undertaking (‘ employees ’) and non-employees who are either individual contractors supplying labour to the undertaking (‘self-employed people’) or people provided by undertakings primarily engaged in ‘employment activities’ (NACE Code N78). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ozone-depleting substances |
Substances listed in the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Packaging |
Products made of any materials of any nature to be used for the containment, protection, handling, delivery, storage, transport and presentation of goods, from raw materials to processed goods, from the producer to the user or consumer (21). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pay |
The ordinary basic or minimum wage or salary and any other remuneration, whether in cash or in kind which the worker receives directly or indirectly (‘complementary or variable components’), in respect of his/her employment from his/her employer. ‘ Pay level’ means gross annual pay and the corresponding gross hourly pay. ‘Median pay level’ means the pay of the employee that would have half of the employees earn more and half less than they do. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Persons with disabilities |
Persons who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Physical risks |
All global economic enterprise depends on the functioning of earth systems, such as a stable climate and on ecosystem services , such as the provision of biomass ( raw materials ). Nature-related physical risks are a direct result of an organisation’s dependence on nature. Physical risks arise when natural systems are compromised, due to the impact of climatic events (e.g., extremes of weather such as a drought), geologic events (e.g., seismic events such as an earthquake) events or changes in ecosystem equilibria, such as soil quality or marine ecology, which affect the ecosystem services organisations depend on. These can be acute, chronic, or both. Nature-related physical risks arise as a result of changes in the biotic (living) and abiotic (non-living) conditions that support healthy, functioning ecosystems . Physical risks are usually location-specific. Nature-related physical risks are often associated with climate-related physical risks . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Planetary boundaries |
This concept allows to estimate a safe operating space for humanity with respect to the functioning of the Earth. The boundary level for each key Earth System process that should not be transgressed if we are to avoid unacceptable global environmental change, is quantified. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policy |
A set or framework of general objectives and management principles that the undertaking uses for decision-making. A policy implements the undertaking’s strategy or management decisions related to a material sustainability matter. Each policy is under the responsibility of defined person(s), specifies its perimeter of application, and includes one or more objectives (linked when applicable to measurable targets ). A policy is validated and reviewed following the undertakings’ applicable governance rules. A policy is implemented through actions or action plans. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pollutant |
A substance , vibration, heat, noise, light or other contaminant present in air, water or soil which may be harmful to human health and/or the environment, which may result in damage to material property, or which may impair or interfere with amenities and other legitimate uses of the environment (22). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pollution |
The direct or indirect introduction, as a result of human activity, of pollutants into air, water or soil which may be harmful to human health and/or the environment, which may result in damage to material property, or which may impair or interfere with amenities and other legitimate uses of the environment (23). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pollution of soil |
The introduction into soil – independent of whether that introduction occurs at the production site of an undertaking or outside or through the use of the undertaking’s products and/or services – as a result of human activity, of substances , vibrations, heat or noise which may be harmful to human health or the environment, result in damage to material property, or impair or interfere with amenities and other legitimate uses of the environment (24). Soil pollutants include inorganic pollutants , persistent organic pollutants (POPs), pesticides, nitrogen and phosphorus compounds, etc. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Protected area |
A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, or cooling |
When the undertaking has received its electricity, heat, steam, or cooling from a third party. The term “acquired” reflects circumstances where a company may not directly purchase electricity (e.g., a tenant in a building), but where the energy is brought into the undertaking’s facility for use. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raw material |
Primary or secondary material that is used to produce a product. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recognised quality standards for carbon credits |
Quality standards for carbon credits that are verifiable by independent third parties, make requirements and project reports publicly available and at a minimum ensure additionality, permanence, avoidance of double counting and provide rules for calculation, monitoring, and verification of the project’s GHG emissions and removals. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recordable work-related injury or ill health |
Work-related injury or ill health that results in any of the following:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recovery |
Any operation the principal result of which is waste serving a useful purpose by replacing other materials which would otherwise have been used to fulfil a particular function, or waste being prepared to fulfil that function, in the plant or in the wider economy (25). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recycling |
Any recovery operation by which waste materials are reprocessed into products, materials or substances whether for the original or other purposes. It includes the reprocessing of organic material but does not include energy recovery and the reprocessing into materials that are to be used as fuels or for backfilling operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resource regeneration |
Promotion of self-renewal capacity of natural systems with the aim of reactivating ecological processes damaged or over-exploited by human action. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remedy/remediation |
To counteract or make good a negative impact. Examples: apologies, financial or non-financial compensation, prevention of harm through injunctions or guarantees of non-repetition, punitive sanctions (whether criminal or administrative, such as fines), restitution, restoration, rehabilitation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renewable energy |
Energy from renewable non-fossil sources, namely wind, solar (solar thermal and solar photovoltaic) and geothermal energy, ambient energy, tide, wave and other ocean energy, hydropower, biomass, landfill gas, sewage treatment plant gas, and biogas (26). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renewable materials |
Materials that are derived from resources that are quickly replenished by ecological cycles or agricultural processes, so that the services provided by these and other linked resources are not endangered and remain available for the next generation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resource inflows |
Resource that enters the undertaking’s facilities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resource outflows |
Resource that leaves the undertaking’s facilities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resource use optimisation |
The design, production and distribution of materials and products with the objective to keep them in use at their highest value. Eco-design and design for longevity , repair, reuse , repurposing, disassembly, remanufacturing are examples of tools to optimise resource use. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reuse |
Any operation by which products and components that are not waste are used again for the same purpose for which they were conceived. This may involve cleaning or small adjustments so it is ready for the next use without significant modification. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
River basin |
The area of land from which all surface run-off flows through a sequence of streams, rivers and, possibly, lakes into the sea at a single river mouth, estuary or delta. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risks |
Sustainability-related risks with negative financial effects arising from environmental, social or governance matters that may negatively affect the undertaking's financial position, financial performance, cash flows, access to finance or cost of capital in the short, medium or long term. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scenario |
A plausible description of how the future may develop based on a coherent and internally consistent set of assumptions about key driving forces (e.g., rate of technological change, prices) and relationships. Note that scenarios are neither predictions nor forecasts but are used to provide a view of the implications of developments and actions . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scenario analysis |
A process for identifying and assessing a potential range of outcomes of future events under conditions of uncertainty. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scope 1 GHG emissions |
Direct GHG emissions from sources that are owned or controlled by the undertaking. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scope 2 GHG emissions |
Indirect emissions from the generation of purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heat or cooling consumed by the undertaking. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scope 3 GHG emissions |
All indirect GHG emissions (not included in scope 2 GHG emissions ) that occur in the value chain of the reporting undertaking, including both upstream and downstream emissions . Scope 3 GHG emissions can be broken down into scope 3 categories . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scope 3 category |
One of the 15 types of Scope 3 GHG emissions identified by the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard and detailed by the GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain ( Scope 3 ) Accounting and Reporting Standard (adapted from GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain ( Scope 3 ) Accounting and Reporting Standard, Glossary (Version 2011). Undertakings that choose to account for their Scope 3 emissions based on the indirect GHG emissions categories of ISO 14064-1:2018 may also refer to the category defined in clause 5.2.4 (excluding indirect GHG emissions from imported energy) of ISO 14064-1:2018. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sensitive information |
Sensitive information as defined in Regulation (EU) 2021/697 of the European Parliament and of the Council (27) establishing the European Defence Fund. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Site |
The location of one or more physical installations . If there is more than one physical installation from the same or different owners or operators and certain infrastructure and facilities are shared, the entire area where the physical installation are located may constitute a site . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Social dialogue |
All types of negotiation, consultation or simply exchange of information between, or among, representatives of governments, employers, their organisations and workers’ representatives , on issues of common interest relating to economic and social policy. It can exist as a tripartite process, with the government as an official party to the dialogue or it may consist of bipartite relations only between workers' representatives and management (or trade unions and employers' organisations). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Social protection |
The set of measures designed to reduce and prevent poverty and vulnerability across the life cycle. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Soil |
The top layer of the Earth’s crust situated between the bedrock and the surface. The soil is composed of mineral particles, organic matter, water, air and living organisms (28). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Soil degradation |
The diminishing capacity of the soil to provide ecosystem goods and services as desired by its stakeholders . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Soil sealing |
Covering soil in a way that makes the covered area impermeable (e.g. a road). This non-permeability can create environmental impacts as described in Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/2026 (29). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specific loads |
Mass of pollutant released per mass of product manufactured. Specific loads allow for the comparison of the environmental performance of installations irrespective of their different production volumes and are not influenced by mixing or dilution (30). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stakeholder engagement |
An ongoing process of interaction and dialogue between the undertaking and its stakeholders that enables the undertaking to hear, understand and respond to their interests and concerns. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stakeholders |
Those who can affect or be affected by the undertaking. There are two main groups of stakeholders :
Some, but not all, stakeholders may belong to the two groups. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Substances |
Any chemical element and its compounds, with the exception of the following substances :
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Substances of concern |
A substance that:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) |
Substances that meet the criteria laid down in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) and were identified in accordance with Article 59(1) of that Regulation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplier |
Entity upstream from the organisation (i.e., in the organisation’s supply chain ), which provides a product or service that is used in the development of the organisation’s own products or services. A supplier can have a direct business relationship with the organisation (often referred to as a first-tier supplier ) or an indirect business relationship. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supply chain |
The full range of activities or processes carried out by entities upstream from the undertaking, which provide products or services that are used in the development and production of the undertaking’s own products or services. This includes upstream entities with which the undertaking has a direct relationship (often referred to as a first-tier supplier ) and entities with which the undertaking has an indirect business relationship. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surface water |
Inland waters, except groundwater ; transitional waters and coastal waters, except in respect of chemical status for which it shall also include territorial waters (37). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability matters |
Environmental, social and human rights, and governance factors, including sustainability factors defined in Article 2, point (24), of Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council (38). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability statement |
The dedicated section of the undertaking’s management report where the information about sustainability matters prepared in compliance with Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (39) and the ESRS is presented. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability-related opportunities |
Uncertain environmental, social or governance events or conditions that, if they occur, could cause a potential material positive effect on the undertaking's business model , or strategy on its capability to achieve its goals and targets and to create value, and therefore may influence its decisions and those of its business relationship partners with regard to sustainability matters . Like any other opportunity , sustainability-related opportunities are measured as a combination of an impact’s magnitude and the probability of occurrence. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability-related risks |
Uncertain environmental, social or governance events or conditions that, if they occur, could cause a potential material negative effect on the undertaking's business model or strategy and on its capability to achieve its goals and targets and to create value, and therefore may influence its decisions and those of its business relationships with regard to sustainability matters . Like any other risks , sustainability- related risks are the combination of an impact’s magnitude and the probability of occurrence. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability-related impacts |
The effect the undertaking has or could have on the environment and people, including effects on their human rights, as a result of the undertaking's activities or business relationships . The impacts can be actual or potential, negative or positive, short-term, medium or long-term, intended or unintended, and reversible or irreversible. Impacts indicate the undertaking's contribution, negative or positive, to sustainable development. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Systemic risks |
Risks arising from the breakdown of the entire system, rather than the failure of individual parts. They are characterised by modest tipping points combining indirectly to produce large failures with cascading of interactions of physical and transition risks (contagion), as one loss triggers a chain of others, and with systems unable to recover equilibrium after a shock. An example is the loss of a keystone species, such as sea otters, which have a critical role in ecosystem community structure. When sea otters were hunted to near extinction in the 1900s, the coastal ecosystems flipped and biomass production was greatly reduced. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Targets |
Measurable, outcome-oriented and time-bound goals that the undertaking aims to achieve in relation to material impacts , risks or opportunities . They may be set voluntarily by the undertaking or derive from legal requirements on the undertaking. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threatened species |
Endangered species, including flora and fauna, listed in the European Red List or the IUCN Red List, as referred to in Section 7 of Annex II to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Training |
Initiatives put in place by the undertaking aimed at the maintenance and/or improvement of skills and knowledge of its own workers . It can include different methodologies, such as on-site training, and online training. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transition plan |
A specific type of action plan that is adopted by the undertaking in relation to a strategic decision and that addresses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transition plan for climate change mitigation |
An aspect of an undertaking’s overall strategy that lays out the undertaking’s targets , actions and resources for its transition towards a lower--carbon economy, including actions such as reducing its GHG emissions with regard to the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C and climate neutrality. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transition risks |
Risks that result from a misalignment between an organisation’s or investor’s strategy and management and the changing regulatory, policy or societal landscape in which it operates. Developments aimed at halting or reversing damage to the climate or to nature, such as government measures, technological breakthroughs, market changes, litigation and changing consumer preferences can all create or change transition risks . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Users |
Users of sustainability statements are primary users of general-purpose financial reporting (existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors including asset managers, credit institutions, insurance undertakings), as well as other users , including the undertaking’s business partners, trade unions and social partners, civil society and non-governmental organisations, governments, analysts and academics. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value chain |
The full range of activities, resources and relationships related to the undertaking’s business model and the external environment in which it operates. A value chain encompasses the activities, resources and relationships the undertaking uses and relies on to create its products or services from conception to delivery, consumption and end-of- life. Relevant activities, resources and relationships include:
Value chain includes actors upstream and downstream from the undertaking. Actors upstream from the undertaking (e.g., suppliers ) provide products or services that are used in the development of the undertaking’s products or services. Entities downstream from the undertaking (e.g., distributors, customers) receive products or services from the undertaking. ESRS use the term “ value chain ” in the singular, although it is recognised that undertakings may have multiple value chains . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value chain worker |
An individual performing work in the value chain of the undertaking, regardless of the existence or nature of any contractual relationship with the undertaking. In the ESRS, the scope of workers in the value chain include all workers in the undertaking’s upstream and downstream value chain who are or can be materially impacted by the undertaking. This includes impacts that are connected to the undertaking’s own operations, and value chain , including through its products or services, as well as through its business relationships . This includes all workers who are not in the scope of ‘ Own Workforce ’ (‘ Own Workforce ’ includes people who are in an employment relationship with the undertaking (‘ employees ’) and non-employees who are either individual contractors supplying labour to the undertaking (‘self-employed people’) or people provided by undertakings primarily engaged in employment activities. (NACE Code N78) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wage |
Gross wage , excluding variable components such as overtime and incentive pay , and excluding allowances unless they are guaranteed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waste |
Any substance or object which the holder discards or intends or is required to discard (40). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waste hierarchy |
Priority order in waste prevention and management (41):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waste management |
The collection, transport, recovery and disposal of waste , including the supervision of such operations and the after-care of disposal sites , and including actions taken as a dealer or broker (42). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wastewater |
Water which is of no further immediate value to the purpose for which it was used or in the pursuit of which it was produced because of its quality, quantity, or time of occurrence. Wastewater from one user can be a potential supply to a user elsewhere. Cooling water is not considered to be wastewater . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Water consumption |
The amount of water drawn into the boundaries of the undertaking (or facility) and not discharged back to the water environment or a third party over the course of the reporting period. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Water discharge |
The sum of effluents and other water leaving the boundaries of the organisation and released to surface water, groundwater , or third parties over the course of the reporting period. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Water intensity |
A metric providing the relationship between a volumetric aspect of water and a unit of activity (products, sales, etc.) created. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Water (recycled and reused) |
Water and wastewater (treated or untreated) that has been used more than once before being discharged from the undertaking’s or shared facilities’ boundary, so that water demand is reduced. This may be in the same process (recycled) or in a different process within the same facility (own or shared with other undertakings) or in another of the undertaking’s facilities (reused). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Water scarcity |
The volumetric abundance, or lack thereof, of freshwater resources. Scarcity is human driven, it is a function of the volume of human water consumption relative to the volume of water resources in a given area. As such, an arid region with very little water, but no human water consumption would not be considered scarce, but rather arid. Water scarcity is a physical, objective reality that can be measured consistently across regions and over time. Water scarcity reflects the physical abundance of freshwater rather than whether that water is suitable for use. For instance, a region may have abundant water resources (and thus not be considered water scarce) but have such severe pollution that those supplies are unfit for human or ecological uses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Water withdrawal |
The sum of all water drawn into the boundaries of the undertaking from all sources for any use over the course of the reporting period. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Workers’ representatives |
Workers' representatives means:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Work-life balance |
Satisfactory state of equilibrium between an individual’s work and private life. Work-life balance in a broader sense encompasses not only the balance between work and private life given family or care responsibilities, but also time allocation between time spent at work and in private life beyond family responsibilities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Work-related hazards |
Work-related hazards can be:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Work-related incident |
Occurrence arising out of or in the course of work that could or does result in injury or ill health. Incidents might be due to, for example, electrical problems, explosion, fire, overflow, overturning, leakage, flow, breakage, bursting, splitting, loss of control, slipping, stumbling and falling, body movement without stress, body movement under/with stress, shock, fright, workplace violence or harassment (e.g., sexual harassment ). An incident that results in injury or ill health is often referred to as an ‘accident’. An incident that has the potential to result in injury or ill health but where none occurs is often referred to as a ‘close call’, ‘near-miss’, or ‘near-hit’. |
(1) Regulation (EU) 757/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).
(2) Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17).
(3) Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (OJ L 317, 9.12.2019, p. 1).
(4) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1).
(5) Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (IED).
(6) Commission Implementing Decision of 10 February 2012 laying down rules concerning guidance on the collection of data and on the drawing up of BAT reference documents and on their quality assurance referred to in Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (OJ L 63, 2.3.2012, p. 1).
(7) Article 3 point 10 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (IED).
(8) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 of 4 June 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives (OJ L 442, 9.12.2021, p. 1).
(9) Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (IED).
(10) 2013/488/EU: Council Decision of 23 September 2013 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information (OJ L 274, 15.10.2013, p. 1).
(11) Annex I point 21 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 of 6 April 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the details of the content and presentation of the information in relation to the principle of ‘do no significant harm’, specifying the content, methodologies and presentation of information in relation to sustainability indicators and adverse sustainability impacts, and the content and presentation of the information in relation to the promotion of environmental or social characteristics and sustainable investment objectives in pre-contractual documents, on websites and in periodic reports (OJ L 196, 25.7.2022, p. 1).
(12) Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (IED).
(13) Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1).
(14) Article 2(20) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (OJ L 198, 22.6.2020, p. 13).
(15) Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (OJ L 204, 26.7.2006, p. 23).
(16) Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ L 303, 2.12.2000, p. 16).
(17) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3).
(18) Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the statistical classification of economic activities NACE Revision 2 and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3037/90 as well as certain EC Regulations on specific statistical domains (OJ L 393, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
(19) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 of 6 April 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the details of the content and presentation of the information in relation to the principle of ‘do no significant harm’, specifying the content, methodologies and presentation of information in relation to sustainability indicators and adverse sustainability impacts, and the content and presentation of the information in relation to the promotion of environmental or social characteristics and sustainable investment objectives in pre-contractual documents, on websites and in periodic reports (OJ L 196, 25.7.2022, p. 1).
(20) Article 2 point (g) of Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste (OJ L 182, 16.7.1999, p. 1).
(21) Article 3(1) of Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste (OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p. 10).
(22) Article 2(10) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment.
(23) Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (IED).
(24) Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (IED).
(25) Article 3(15) of Directive 2008/98/EC on waste.
(26) Article 2(1) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 82).
(27) Regulation (EU) 2021/697 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, p. 149).
(28) Article 3(21) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (IED).
(29) Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/2026 of 19 December 2018 amending Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (OJ L 325, 20.12.2018, p. 18).
(30) Commission Implementing Decision of 10 February 2012 laying down rules concerning guidance on the collection of data and on the drawing up of BAT reference documents and on their quality, assurance referred to in Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions.
(31) Council Directive 96/29/Euratom of 13 May 1996 laying down basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiation (OJ L 159, 29.6.1996, p. 1).
(32) Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms (OJ L 125, 21.5.2009, p. 75).
(33) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC (OJ L 106, 17.4.2001, p. 1).
(34) Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (IED).
(35) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1)
(36) Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 353, 31.12.2008, p. 1).
(37) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (Water Framework Directive).
(38) Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector.
(39) Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19).
(40) Article 3(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC on waste.
(41) Article 4(1) of the Directive 2008/98/EC on waste.
(42) Article 3(9) of the Directive 2008/98/EC on waste.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2772/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)