This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CN0358
Case C-358/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 9 June 2021 — Tilman SA v Unilever Supply Chain Company AG
Case C-358/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 9 June 2021 — Tilman SA v Unilever Supply Chain Company AG
Case C-358/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 9 June 2021 — Tilman SA v Unilever Supply Chain Company AG
OJ C 338, 23.8.2021, pp. 14–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
23.8.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 338/14 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 9 June 2021 — Tilman SA v Unilever Supply Chain Company AG
(Case C-358/21)
(2021/C 338/18)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Cour de cassation
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant in cassation: Tilman SA
Respondent in cassation: Unilever Supply Chain Company AG
Question referred
Are the requirements under Article 23(1)(a) and (2) of the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, signed in Lugano on 30 October 2007, satisfied where a clause conferring jurisdiction is contained in general terms and conditions to which a contract concluded in writing refers by providing the hypertext link to a website, access to which allows those general terms and conditions to be viewed, downloaded and printed, without the party against whom that clause is enforced having been asked to accept those general terms and conditions by ticking a box on that website?