Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CA0178

    Case C-178/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 — MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Intervet International BV v European Medicines Agency (EMA) (Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a veterinary medicinal product — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality)

    OJ C 77, 9.3.2020, p. 4–4 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    9.3.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 77/4


    Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 — MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Intervet International BV v European Medicines Agency (EMA)

    (Case C-178/18 P) (1)

    (Appeal - Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - First indent of Article 4(2) - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests - Article 4(3) - Protection of the decision-making process - Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a veterinary medicinal product - Decision to grant a third party access to the documents - General presumption of confidentiality - No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality)

    (2020/C 77/05)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellants: MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Intervet International BV (represented by: C. Thomas, Barrister, J. Stratford QC, B. Kelly, Solicitor, and P. Bogaert, advocaat)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Medicines Agency (initially represented by: T. Jabłoński, S. Marino, S. Drosos and A. Rusanov, subsequently by T. Jabłoński, S. Marino and S. Drosos, acting as Agents)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2.

    Orders MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet International BV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).


    (1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.


    Top