This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TN0847
Case T-847/19: Action brought on 13 December 2019 — X-cen-tek v EUIPO — Altenloh, Brinck & Co. (PAX)
Case T-847/19: Action brought on 13 December 2019 — X-cen-tek v EUIPO — Altenloh, Brinck & Co. (PAX)
Case T-847/19: Action brought on 13 December 2019 — X-cen-tek v EUIPO — Altenloh, Brinck & Co. (PAX)
OJ C 45, 10.2.2020, p. 95–95
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.2.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 45/95 |
Action brought on 13 December 2019 — X-cen-tek v EUIPO — Altenloh, Brinck & Co. (PAX)
(Case T-847/19)
(2020/C 45/81)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: X-cen-tek GmbH & Co. KG (Wardenburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Hillers, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Altenloh, Brinck & Co. GmbH & Co. KG (Ennepetal, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark PAX — Application for registration No 16 487 803
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 September 2019 in Case R 2324/2018-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |