Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TN0096

    Case T-96/14: Action brought on 11 February 2014 — Vimeo v OHIM — PT Comunicações (VIMEO)

    OJ C 135, 5.5.2014, p. 52–53 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.5.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 135/52


    Action brought on 11 February 2014 — Vimeo v OHIM — PT Comunicações (VIMEO)

    (Case T-96/14)

    2014/C 135/67

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Vimeo LLC (New York, United States) (represented by: A. Poulter and M. Macdonald, Solicitors)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: PT Comunicações, SA (Lisbon, Portugal)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 November 2013 given in Case R 1092/2013-2;

    Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘VIMEO’ for services in Classes 38, 41 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 9 843 061

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘meo’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35, 37, 38, 41 and 42

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in entirety

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

    Pleas in law: Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.


    Top