This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TB0411
Case T-411/11: Order of the General Court of 10 March 2014 — Hemofarm v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (HEMOFARM) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-411/11: Order of the General Court of 10 March 2014 — Hemofarm v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (HEMOFARM) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-411/11: Order of the General Court of 10 March 2014 — Hemofarm v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (HEMOFARM) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 135, 5.5.2014, p. 36–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 10/03/2014
- Date lodged:
- 28/07/2011
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Spanish
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
5.5.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 135/36 |
Order of the General Court of 10 March 2014 — Hemofarm v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (HEMOFARM)
(Case T-411/11) (1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 135/45
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Hemofarm AD farmaceutsko-hemijska industrija Vršac (Vršac, Serbia) (represented by: D. Cañadas Arcas, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Laboratorios Diafarm, SA (Barberà del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 May 2011 (Case R 298/2010-4), concerning an opposition procedure between Laboratorios Diafarm, SA and Hemofarm AD farmaceutsko-hemijska industrija Vršac.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the present action. |
|
2. |
All the parties are ordered to bear their own costs. |
