Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008CA0393

    Case C-393/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio — Italy) — Emanuela Sbarigia v Azienda USL RM/A, Comune di Roma, Assiprofar — Associazione Sindacale Proprietari Farmacia, Ordine dei Farmacisti della Provincia di Roma (National legislation governing opening times and closing days of pharmacies — Exemption — Power of decision of the competent authorities)

    OJ C 234, 28.8.2010, p. 6–6 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    28.8.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 234/6


    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio — Italy) — Emanuela Sbarigia v Azienda USL RM/A, Comune di Roma, Assiprofar — Associazione Sindacale Proprietari Farmacia, Ordine dei Farmacisti della Provincia di Roma

    (Case C-393/08) (1)

    (National legislation governing opening times and closing days of pharmacies - Exemption - Power of decision of the competent authorities)

    2010/C 234/08

    Language of the case: Italian

    Referring court

    Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Emanuela Sbarigia

    Defendants: Azienda USL RM/A, Comune di Roma, Assiprofar — Associazione Sindacale Proprietari Farmacia, Ordine dei Farmacisti della Provincia di Roma

    Re:

    Reference for a Preliminary Ruling — Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio– Interpretation of Arts 49, 81 to 86, 152 and 153 EC — National legislation governing the opening hours and rota arrangements for pharmacies — Pharmacists forbidden to decline annual holiday closure or to remain open beyond the maximum limits set for opening hours

    Operative part of the judgment

    The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio, made by decision of 21 May 2008, is inadmissible.


    (1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.


    Top