Case T-287/15: Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2017 — Tayto Group v EUIPO — MIP Metro (real) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark real — Genuine use — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character — Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Use of the mark by a third party — Article 15(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Proof of genuine use — Article 15(1) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons)

Kawża T-287/15: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tat-28 ta’ Ġunju 2017 – Tayto Group vs EUIPO – MIP Metro (real) [“Trade mark tal-Unjoni Ewropea — Proċedimenti ta’ revoka — Trade mark figurattiva tal-Unjoni Ewropea real — Użu ġenwin — Forma li hija differenti minħabba elementi li ma jbiddlux il-karattru distintiv — Artikolu 15(1)(a) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009 — Użu tat-trade mark minn terz — Artikolu 15(2) tar-Regolament Nru 207/2009 — Prova ta’ użu ġenwin — Artikolu 15(1) u Artikolu 51(1)(a) tar-Regolament Nru 207/2009 — Obbligu ta’ motivazzjoni”]

Kawża T-287/15: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tat-28 ta’ Ġunju 2017 – Tayto Group vs EUIPO – MIP Metro (real) [“Trade mark tal-Unjoni Ewropea — Proċedimenti ta’ revoka — Trade mark figurattiva tal-Unjoni Ewropea real — Użu ġenwin — Forma li hija differenti minħabba elementi li ma jbiddlux il-karattru distintiv — Artikolu 15(1)(a) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009 — Użu tat-trade mark minn terz — Artikolu 15(2) tar-Regolament Nru 207/2009 — Prova ta’ użu ġenwin — Artikolu 15(1) u Artikolu 51(1)(a) tar-Regolament Nru 207/2009 — Obbligu ta’ motivazzjoni”]

ĠU C 277, 21.8.2017, p. 34–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)