Case T-415/11: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2012 — Hartmann v OHIM (Nutriskin Protection Complex) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark Nutriskin Protection Complex — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — OHIM’s decision-making practice — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

Kawża T-415/11: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tat- 8 ta’ Novembru 2012 — Hartmann vs UASI (Nutriskin Protection Complex) ( “Trade mark Komunitarja — Applikazzjoni għat-trade mark Komunitarja verbali Nutriskin Protection Complex — Raġunijiet assoluti għal rifjut — Karattru deskrittiv — Artikolu 7(1)(c) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009 — Assenza ta’ karattru distintiv — Artikolu 7(1)(b) tar-Regolament Nru 207/2009 — Prattika deċiżjonali tal-UASI — Obbligu ta’ motivazzjoni — Artikolu 75 tar-Regolament Nru 207/2009” )

Kawża T-415/11: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tat- 8 ta’ Novembru 2012 — Hartmann vs UASI (Nutriskin Protection Complex) ( “Trade mark Komunitarja — Applikazzjoni għat-trade mark Komunitarja verbali Nutriskin Protection Complex — Raġunijiet assoluti għal rifjut — Karattru deskrittiv — Artikolu 7(1)(c) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 207/2009 — Assenza ta’ karattru distintiv — Artikolu 7(1)(b) tar-Regolament Nru 207/2009 — Prattika deċiżjonali tal-UASI — Obbligu ta’ motivazzjoni — Artikolu 75 tar-Regolament Nru 207/2009” )

ĠU C 399, 22.12.2012, p. 20–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)