EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TB0138
Case T-138/12: Order of the General Court of 20 November 2012 — Geipel v OHIM — Reeh (BEST BODY NUTRITION) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-138/12: Order of the General Court of 20 November 2012 — Geipel v OHIM — Reeh (BEST BODY NUTRITION) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-138/12: Order of the General Court of 20 November 2012 — Geipel v OHIM — Reeh (BEST BODY NUTRITION) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
SL C 26, 26.1.2013, p. 49–49
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.1.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 26/49 |
Order of the General Court of 20 November 2012 — Geipel v OHIM — Reeh (BEST BODY NUTRITION)
(Case T-138/12) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 26/98
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Yves Geipel (Auerbach, Germany) (represented by: J. Sachs, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Marten and R. Pethke, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Jörg Reeh (Buxtehude, Germany)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2012 (Case R 2433/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Jörg Reeh and Yves Geipel.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
The applicant is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant. |