This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TB0017
Case T-17/10: Order of the General Court of 27 November 2012 — Steinberg v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights — Partial refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-17/10: Order of the General Court of 27 November 2012 — Steinberg v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights — Partial refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-17/10: Order of the General Court of 27 November 2012 — Steinberg v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights — Partial refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
SL C 26, 26.1.2013, p. 44–45
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.1.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 26/44 |
Order of the General Court of 27 November 2012 — Steinberg v Commission
(Case T-17/10) (1)
(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights - Partial refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
2013/C 26/86
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Gerald Steinberg (Jerusalem, Israel) (represented by: T. Asserson, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Tufvesson and C. ten Dam, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision SG.E.3/MV/psi D(2009) 3914 of 15 May 2009, partially refusing the applicant access to certain documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR)
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law; |
|
2. |
Mr Gerald Steinberg shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |