EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2012/399/37
Case T-555/11: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2012 — tesa v OHIM — Superquímica (tesa TACK) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark tesa TACK — Earlier national figurative mark TACK Ceys — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-555/11: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2012 — tesa v OHIM — Superquímica (tesa TACK) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark tesa TACK — Earlier national figurative mark TACK Ceys — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-555/11: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2012 — tesa v OHIM — Superquímica (tesa TACK) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark tesa TACK — Earlier national figurative mark TACK Ceys — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
IO C 399, 22.12.2012, p. 21–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.12.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 399/21 |
Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2012 — tesa v OHIM — Superquímica (tesa TACK)
(Case T-555/11) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark tesa TACK - Earlier national figurative mark TACK Ceys - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 399/37
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: tesa SE (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: F. Schwab, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: La Superquímica, SA (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 July 2011 (Case R 866/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between La Superquímica, SA and tesa SE.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders tesa SE to pay the costs. |