This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CN0387
Case C-387/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 17 May 2019 — RTS infra BVBA, Aannemingsbedrijf Norré-Behaegel v Vlaams Gewest
Case C-387/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 17 May 2019 — RTS infra BVBA, Aannemingsbedrijf Norré-Behaegel v Vlaams Gewest
Case C-387/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 17 May 2019 — RTS infra BVBA, Aannemingsbedrijf Norré-Behaegel v Vlaams Gewest
OJ C 270, 12.8.2019, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.8.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 270/19 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 17 May 2019 — RTS infra BVBA, Aannemingsbedrijf Norré-Behaegel v Vlaams Gewest
(Case C-387/19)
(2019/C 270/21)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Raad van State
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: RTS infra BVBA, Aannemingsbedrijf Norré-Behaegel
Defendant: Vlaams Gewest
Questions referred
|
1. |
Should the provisions of Article 57(4)(c) and (g), in conjunction with paragraphs 6 and 7 of that article, of Directive 2014/24/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC be interpreted as precluding an application whereby the economic operator is required to provide evidence on its own initiative of the measures that the economic operator has taken to demonstrate its reliability? |
|
2. |
If so, do the provisions of Article 57(4)(c) and (g), in conjunction with paragraphs 6 and 7 of that article, of Directive 2014/24 therefore have direct effect? |