Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017CN0345

    Case C-345/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 12 June 2017 — Sergejs Buivids

    OJ C 277, 21.8.2017, p. 27–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.8.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 277/27


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 12 June 2017 — Sergejs Buivids

    (Case C-345/17)

    (2017/C 277/39)

    Language of the case: Latvian

    Referring court

    Augstākā tiesa

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Sergejs Buivids

    Other party to the proceedings: Datu valsts inspekcija

    Questions referred

    1.

    Do activities such as those at issue in the present case, that is to say, the recording, in a police station, of police officers carrying out procedural measures and publication of the video on the Internet site www.youtube.com, fall within the scope of Directive 95/46? (1)

    2.

    Must Directive 95/46 be interpreted as meaning that those activities may be regarded as the processing of personal data for journalistic purposes, within the meaning of Article 9 of that directive?


    (1)  Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ 1995 L 281, p. 31).


    Top