This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TN0519
Case T-519/12: Action brought on 27 November 2012 — mobile.international v OHIM — Kommission (PL mobile.eu)
Case T-519/12: Action brought on 27 November 2012 — mobile.international v OHIM — Kommission (PL mobile.eu)
Case T-519/12: Action brought on 27 November 2012 — mobile.international v OHIM — Kommission (PL mobile.eu)
OJ C 26, 26.1.2013, p. 67–68
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
26.1.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 26/67 |
Action brought on 27 November 2012 — mobile.international v OHIM — Kommission (PL mobile.eu)
(Case T-519/12)
2013/C 26/132
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: mobile.international GmbH (Kleinmachnow, Germany) (represented by: T. Lührig, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should,
— |
annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 September 2012 in Case R 1401/2011-1 in respect of the following goods and services;
|
— |
in the alternative, annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 September 2012 in Case R 1401/2011-1 in respect of services in Classes 35, 38 and 42 to the extent referred to above; |
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘PL mobile.eu’ in respect of goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38 and 42 — Community trade mark No 8 307 779
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The European Commission
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The Community trade mark constitutes a heraldic imitation of the mullets of the European Union
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Decision of the Cancellation Division annulled and the Community trade mark declared invalid
Pleas in law:
— |
Infringement of Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 6 of the Paris Convention |
— |
Infringement of Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
— |
Infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations |