Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006FA0067

Case F-67/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — Lesniak v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Appointment — Temporary agents appointed as officials — Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Transitional rules governing classification in grade at the time of recruitment — Classification in grade pursuant to the new, less favourable rules — Article 5(4) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

OJ C 234, 28.8.2010, p. 55–55 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

28.8.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/55


Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — Lesniak v Commission

(Case F-67/06) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Appointment - Temporary agents appointed as officials - Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Transitional rules governing classification in grade at the time of recruitment - Classification in grade pursuant to the new, less favourable rules - Article 5(4) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

2010/C 234/100

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Christophe Lesniak (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Simm and I. Šulce, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Commission decision of 8 August 2005 appointing the applicant — at that time a member of the temporary staff in grade A*10, step 2, and a successful candidate in External Competition PE/99/A — as a probationary official in grade A*6, step 2

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders the parties to beat their own respective costs.


(1)  OJ C 178 of 29.07.06, p. 43.


Top