This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023TN0502
Case T-502/23: Action brought on 15 August 2023 — HX v Council
Case T-502/23: Action brought on 15 August 2023 — HX v Council
Case T-502/23: Action brought on 15 August 2023 — HX v Council
OJ C 338, 25.9.2023, p. 44–45
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
25.9.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 338/44 |
Action brought on 15 August 2023 — HX v Council
(Case T-502/23)
(2023/C 338/57)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Parties
Applicant: HX (represented by: St. Koev, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
declare the action admissible and well founded in its entirety and find that all the pleas in law set out therein are well founded; |
— |
hold that the contested acts may be annulled in part; |
— |
annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1035 of 25 May 2023 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, (1) in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
— |
annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1027 of 25 May 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, (2) in so far as it concerns the applicant, and |
— |
order the Council of the European Union to pay all of the applicant’s costs, expenses, fees and other expenditure linked to his defence. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging manifest infringement of the rights of the defence and the right to a fair trial. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging failure to state reasons on the part of the Council. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to effective judicial protection. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging an error of assessment on the part of the Council. |
5. |
Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to property, of the principle of proportionality and of the freedom to conduct a business. |
6. |
Sixth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to a normal life. |
7. |
Seventh plea in law, alleging a serious infringement of the right to the protection of reputation. |