This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TB0442
Case T-442/11: Order of the General Court of 24 October 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Action for annulment — Act not subject to review — Act which is confirmatory, in part, and informative, in part — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Failure to identify the alleged conduct or to define the alleged damage — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Absence of proof of damage — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-442/11: Order of the General Court of 24 October 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Action for annulment — Act not subject to review — Act which is confirmatory, in part, and informative, in part — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Failure to identify the alleged conduct or to define the alleged damage — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Absence of proof of damage — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-442/11: Order of the General Court of 24 October 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Action for annulment — Act not subject to review — Act which is confirmatory, in part, and informative, in part — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Failure to identify the alleged conduct or to define the alleged damage — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Absence of proof of damage — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 399, 22.12.2012, p. 22–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.12.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 399/22 |
Order of the General Court of 24 October 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
(Case T-442/11) (1)
(Action for annulment - Act not subject to review - Act which is confirmatory, in part, and informative, in part - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Failure to identify the alleged conduct or to define the alleged damage - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Absence of proof of damage - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
2012/C 399/41
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and M. Dermitzakis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and D. Calciu, acting as Agents, assisted by P. Wytinck, lawyer)
Re:
Application, first, for the annulment of a letter of the Commission of 27 May 2011, second, for an order for the Commission to pay damages and, third, for an order for the Commission to publish a communiqué.
Operative part of the order
The General Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |