Ovaj je dokument isječak s web-mjesta EUR-Lex
Dokument 62007FB0074
Case F-74/07 RENV: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 May 2011 — Stefan Meierhofer v European Commission (Civil service — Recruitment — Open competition — Failure of a candidate in the oral test — Obligation to state reasons — Rules governing the work of the selection board)
Case F-74/07 RENV: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 May 2011 — Stefan Meierhofer v European Commission (Civil service — Recruitment — Open competition — Failure of a candidate in the oral test — Obligation to state reasons — Rules governing the work of the selection board)
Case F-74/07 RENV: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 May 2011 — Stefan Meierhofer v European Commission (Civil service — Recruitment — Open competition — Failure of a candidate in the oral test — Obligation to state reasons — Rules governing the work of the selection board)
OJ C 232, 6.8.2011., str. 41–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.8.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 232/41 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 May 2011 — Stefan Meierhofer v European Commission
(Case F-74/07 RENV) (1)
(Civil service - Recruitment - Open competition - Failure of a candidate in the oral test - Obligation to state reasons - Rules governing the work of the selection board)
(2011/C 232/74)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Stefan Meierhofer (Munich, Germany) (represented by: H.-G. Schiessl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)
Re:
Action for annulment of the decision of the selection board in competition EPSO AD/26/05 of 10 May 2007 not to include the applicant on the reserve list of that competition on the ground of his insufficient mark in the oral test.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on Mr Meierhofer's action in so far as it disputes the insufficient statement of reasons for the decision of 19 June 2007. |
|
2. |
The remainder of Mr Meierhofer's action is dismissed, in part as manifestly unfounded, and in part as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
3. |
The European Commission shall bear two thirds of the costs incurred by the applicant in the first set of proceedings before the Tribunal and its own costs relating to the first set of proceedings before the Tribunal, the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union and the present proceedings. |
|
4. |
The applicant shall bear one-third of his own costs relating to the first set of proceedings before the Tribunal and all his own costs relating to the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union and the present proceedings. |