Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 32012R0692R(01)

    Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 692/2012 of 24 July 2012 amending Regulations (EU) No 43/2012 and (EU) No 44/2012 as regards the protection of the giant manta ray and certain fishing opportunities ( OJ L 203, 31.7.2012 )

    SL L 347, 15.12.2012, p. 41–42 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/692/corrigendum/2012-12-15/oj

    15.12.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    L 347/41


    Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 692/2012 of 24 July 2012 amending Regulations (EU) No 43/2012 and (EU) No 44/2012 as regards the protection of the giant manta ray and certain fishing opportunities

    ( Official Journal of the European Union L 203 of 31 July 2012 )

    On page 11, Annex II, point 2, point (f):

    for:

    ‘(f)

    the entry for mackerel in IIIa and IV; EU waters of IIa, IIIb, IIIc and Subdivisions 22-32 is replaced by the following: …’,

    read:

    ‘(f)

    the entry for mackerel in IIIa and IV; EU waters of IIa, IIIb, IIIc and IIId is replaced by the following: …’;

    on page 18, Annex II, point 4, point (a), entry for Union:

    for:

    ‘ 5 330,5 ’,

    read:

    ‘ 5 292 ’;

    on page 18, Annex II, point 4, point (b):

    point (b) is deleted;

    on page 21, Annex II, point 4, point (g):

    new point is added after point (g) as follows:

    ‘(h)

    the entry for white hake in NAFO 3NO is replaced by the following:

    “Species

    :

    White hake

    Urophycis tenuis

    Zone

    :

    NAFO 3NO

    (HKW/N3NO.)

    Spain

    1 273

    Analytical TAC

    Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 does not apply.

    Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 does not apply.’

    Portugal

    1 667

    Union

    2 940

    TAC

    5 000 ”;

    on page 21, Annex II, point 6:

    for:

    ‘6.

    In Annex VI, point 2 is replaced by the following:

    “2.

    Maximum number of EU vessels authorised to fish for swordfish and albacore in the IOTC Convention Area:

    ANNEX VI

    IOTC CONVENTION AREA

    1.

    Maximum number of EU vessels authorised to fish for tropical tunas in the IOTC Convention Area

    Member State

    Maximum number of vessels

    Capacity

    (gross tonnage)

    Spain

    22

    61 364

    France

    22

    33 604

    Portugal

    5

    1 627

    Union

    49

    96 595

    2.

    Maximum number of EU vessels authorised to fish for swordfish and albacore in the IOTC Convention Area

    Member State

    Maximum number of vessels

    Capacity

    (gross tonnage)

    Spain

    27

    11 590

    France

    41

    5 382

    Portugal

    15

    6 925

    United Kingdom

    4

    1 400

    Union

    87

    25 297

    3.

    The vessels referred to in point 1 shall also be authorised to fish for swordfish and albacore in the IOTC Convention Area.

    4.

    The vessels referred to in point 2 shall also be authorised to fish for tropical tunas in the IOTC Convention Area.
    ”.’,

    read:

    ‘6.

    In Annex VI, point 2 is replaced by the following:

    “2.

    Maximum number of EU vessels authorised to fish for swordfish and albacore in the IOTC Convention Area

    Member State

    Maximum number of vessels

    Capacity

    (gross tonnage)

    Spain

    27

    11 590

    France

    41

    5 382

    Portugal

    15

    6 925

    United Kingdom

    4

    1 400

    Union

    87

    25 297 ” ’


    Top