EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62004TA0462
Case T-462/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 December 2008 — HEG and Graphite India v Council (Common commercial policy — Anti-dumping duties — Countervailing duties — Imports of certain graphite electrode systems originating in India — Rights of the defence — Equal treatment — Determination of injury — Causal link)
Case T-462/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 December 2008 — HEG and Graphite India v Council (Common commercial policy — Anti-dumping duties — Countervailing duties — Imports of certain graphite electrode systems originating in India — Rights of the defence — Equal treatment — Determination of injury — Causal link)
Case T-462/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 December 2008 — HEG and Graphite India v Council (Common commercial policy — Anti-dumping duties — Countervailing duties — Imports of certain graphite electrode systems originating in India — Rights of the defence — Equal treatment — Determination of injury — Causal link)
IO C 32, 7.2.2009, p. 25–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
7.2.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 32/25 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 December 2008 — HEG and Graphite India v Council
(Case T-462/04) (1)
(Common commercial policy - Anti-dumping duties - Countervailing duties - Imports of certain graphite electrode systems originating in India - Rights of the defence - Equal treatment - Determination of injury - Causal link)
(2009/C 32/46)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: HEG Ltd (New Delhi, India); and Graphite India Ltd (Kolkata, India) (represented: initially by K. Adamantopoulos, lawyer, and J. Branton, Solicitor, and subsequently by J. Branton)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, assisted by G. Berrisch, lawyer)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. Scharf and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1628/2004 of 13 September 2004 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain graphite electrode systems originating in India (OJ 2004 L 295, p. 4) and of Council Regulation (EC) No 1629/2004 of 13 September 2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain graphite electrode systems originating in India (OJ 2004 L 295, p. 10).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders HEG Ltd and Graphite India Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay the costs of the Council; |
|
3. |
Orders the Commission to bear its own costs. |