Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021TN0751

    Case T-751/21: Action brought on 26 November 2021 — EMS Electro Medical Systems v EUIPO (AIRFLOW)

    IO C 64, 7.2.2022, p. 29–29 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    7.2.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 64/29

    Action brought on 26 November 2021 — EMS Electro Medical Systems v EUIPO (AIRFLOW)

    (Case T-751/21)

    (2022/C 64/41)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: K. Scheib and C. Schulte, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark AIRFLOW — Application for registration No 1 533 193

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2021 in Case R 546/2021-4

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Incorrect interpretation of Articles 7(1)(c) and 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Incorrect interpretation of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 75(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top