This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CN0664
Case C-664/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 5 November 2021 — NEC PLUS ULTRA COSMETICS AG v Republic of Slovenia
Case C-664/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 5 November 2021 — NEC PLUS ULTRA COSMETICS AG v Republic of Slovenia
Case C-664/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 5 November 2021 — NEC PLUS ULTRA COSMETICS AG v Republic of Slovenia
IO C 64, 7.2.2022, p. 14–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
7.2.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 64/14 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 5 November 2021 — NEC PLUS ULTRA COSMETICS AG v Republic of Slovenia
(Case C-664/21)
(2022/C 64/23)
Language of the case: Slovenian
Referring court
Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: NEC PLUS ULTRA COSMETICS AG
Respondent: Republic of Slovenia
Question referred
Do the provisions of the VAT Directive, (1) in particular Articles 131 and 138(1) thereof, and the principles of EU law, in particular the principles of tax neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality, preclude national legislation which prohibits the submission and acceptance of new evidence to demonstrate satisfaction of the substantive requirements laid down in Article 138(1) of the VAT Directive, already during the administrative procedure at first instance, and more specifically in the context of the observations submitted on the tax inspection report issued before a tax assessment notice has been issued?
(1) Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).