Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019TN0188

    Case T-188/19: Action brought on 1 April 2019 — United Kingdom v Commission

    IO C 172, 20.5.2019, p. 46–46 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20.5.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 172/46


    Action brought on 1 April 2019 — United Kingdom v Commission

    (Case T-188/19)

    (2019/C 172/60)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Brandon, Agent, T. Johnston and J. Scott, Barristers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the Commission’s decision to adopt the Final Audit Report, Audit Reference Number 14-BA262-013, as final, as notified to the United Kingdom Government by letter dated 20 December 2018 and received on 21 January 2019;

    order the Commission to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging that the Auditors erred in law in finding that daily timesheets were required and, in doing so, misinterpreted the Grant Agreements.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging that the Final Audit Report unlawfully frustrates the Met Office’s legitimate expectation that its ex post facto time recording system and its monthly calculation of indirect costs rates would satisfy the requirements of the Grant Agreements.


    Top