Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018TN0423

    Case T-423/18: Action brought on 6 July 2018 — Fissler v EUIPO (vita)

    IO C 294, 20.8.2018, p. 64–64 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    201808030772050862018/C 294/794232018TC29420180820EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180706646411

    Case T-423/18: Action brought on 6 July 2018 — Fissler v EUIPO (vita)

    Top

    C2942018EN6410120180706EN0079641641

    Action brought on 6 July 2018 — Fissler v EUIPO (vita)

    (Case T-423/18)

    2018/C 294/79Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Fissler GmbH (Idar-Oberstein, Germany) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt and K. Middelhoff, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘vita’ — Application for registration No 15 857 188

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 March 2018 in Case R 1326/2017-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top