This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008CN0585
Case C-585/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 December 2008 — Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co KG
Case C-585/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 December 2008 — Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co KG
Case C-585/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 December 2008 — Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co KG
IO C 44, 21.2.2009, p. 40–40
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.2.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 44/40 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 December 2008 — Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co KG
(Case C-585/08)
(2009/C 44/68)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria)
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Peter Pammer
Respondent: Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co KG
Questions referred
|
1. |
Does a ‘voyage by freighter’ constitute package travel for the purposes of Article 15(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1)? |
|
2. |
If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: Is the fact that an agent's website can be consulted on the internet sufficient to justify a finding that activities are being ‘directed’ within the terms of Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001? |