Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2016:441:TOC

Official Journal of the European Union, C 441, 28 November 2016


Display all documents published in this Official Journal
 

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 441

European flag  

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 59
28 November 2016


Contents

page

 

IV   Notices

 

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

 

Court of Justice of the European Union

2016/C 441/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

1


 

V   Announcements

 

COURT PROCEEDINGS

 

Court of Justice

2016/C 441/02

Case C-218/15: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Campobasso — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Gianpaolo Paoletti and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 6 TEU — Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principle of retroactivity of the more lenient criminal law — Italian nationals having organised the illegal entry into Italy of Romanian nationals — Acts carried out before the accession of Romania to the European Union — Effect of Romania’s accession on the criminal offence of facilitation of illegal immigration — Implementation of EU law — Jurisdiction of the Court)

2

2016/C 441/03

Case C-318/15: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Piemonte — Italy) — Tecnoedi Costruzioni Srl v Comune di Fossano (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public works contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 7(c) — Threshold amount for public contracts — Threshold not reached — Abnormally low tenders — Automatic exclusion — Discretion of the contracting authority — Obligations of the contracting authority arising from freedom of establishment, freedom to provide services and the general principle of non-discrimination — Contracts which may be of certain cross-border interest)

3

2016/C 441/04

Case C-412/15: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hessisches Finanzgericht — Germany) — TMD Gesellschaft für transfusionsmedizinische Dienste mbH v Finanzamt Kassel II — Hofgeismar (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Article 132(1)(d) — Supplies of human organs, blood and milk — Scope — Plasma of human blood transformed and used for industrial purposes)

3

2016/C 441/05

Case C-466/15: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Jean-Michel Adrien and Others v Prime Minister, Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics, Ministre de la Décentralisation et de la Fonction publique (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for workers — National detached officials within an EU institution or body — Old-age pension — Right to opt — Suspension or maintenance of the affiliation to the national pension scheme — Limitation on the aggregation of the pension acquired under the national pension scheme with that acquired under the EU pension scheme)

4

2016/C 441/06

Case C-572/15: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus — Estonia) — F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v Accord Healthcare OÜ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Industrial and commercial property — Patent — Supplementary protection certificate — Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 — Article 21(2) — Transitional provisions — Certificate granted in accordance with the national legislation of a Member State prior to its accession to the European Union — Interpretation of Article 21(2) — Duration of validity of the certificate — Validity of Article 21(2) — Adjustment to secondary legislation resulting directly from the Act of Accession — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

5

2016/C 441/07

Case C-576/15: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo — Bulgaria) — Маya Маrinova ET v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(a) — Article 9(1) — Article 14(1) — Articles 73, 80 and 273 — Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality — Tax evasion — Anomalies in accounting — Concealment of supplies and revenue — Determination of the taxable amount)

5

2016/C 441/08

Case C-583/15: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 October 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Transport policy — Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 — Road Transport — Administrative simplification and cooperation — Article 16(1) and (5) — National electronic register of road transport undertakings — Interconnection of national electronic registers)

6

2016/C 441/09

Case C-23/16: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 October 2016 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulil obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 — Common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator — Article 16(1) and (5) — National electronic register of road transport undertakings — Lack of interconnection with the electronic registers of other Member States)

7

2016/C 441/10

Case C-472/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León (Spain) lodged on 24 August 2016 — Jorge Luis Colino Sigüenza v Ayuntamiento de Valladolid and In-pulso Musical, Sociedad Cooperativa

7

2016/C 441/11

Case C-474/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Colmar (France) lodged on 29 August 2016 — The public prosecutor, Belu Dienstleistung GmbH & Co KG, Stefan Nikless

8

2016/C 441/12

Case C-486/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 6 de Alicante (Spain) lodged on 12 September 2016 — Bankia, S.A. v Alfredo Sánchez Martínez, Sandra Sánchez Triviño

9

2016/C 441/13

Case C-491/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 14 September 2016 — Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP v Maxiflor — Promoção e Comercialização de Plantas, Importação e Exportação, Lda

10

2016/C 441/14

Case C-498/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 19 September 2016 — Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited

10

2016/C 441/15

Case C-505/16 P: Appeal brought on 23 September 2016 by Olga Stanislavivna Yanukovych, as heir of Viktor Viktorovych Yanukovych against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2016 in Case T-347/14: Olga Stanislavivna Yanukovych v Council of the European Union

11

2016/C 441/16

Case C-507/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 26 September 2016 — ‘Еntertainment Balgaria System’ ЕООD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Sofia

13

2016/C 441/17

Case C-511/16: Action brought on 29 September 2016 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

13

 

General Court

2016/C 441/18

Case T-351/13: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2016 — Crown Equipment (Suzhou) and Crown Gabelstapler v Council (Dumping — Importation of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in China — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Action for annulment — Direct concern — Individual concern — Admissibility — Determination of normal value — Article 2(7)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — ‘Lesser duty’ rule — Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 — Obligation to state reasons)

15

2016/C 441/19

Case T-367/14: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2016 — August Storck v EUIPO — Chiquita Brands (Fruitfuls) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Fruitfuls — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

15

2016/C 441/20

Case T-418/14: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2016 — Sina Bank v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Actions for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Amendment of pleadings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Adjustment of the effects in time of an annulment)

16

2016/C 441/21

Case T-824/14: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2016 — Eveready Battery Company v EUIPO — Hussain and Others (POWER EDGE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark POWER EDGE — Earlier EU word mark EDGE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 15(1) and 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009)

17

2016/C 441/22

Case T-56/15: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2016 — Raimund Schmitt Verpachtungsgesellschaft v EUIPO (BRAUWELT) (EU trade mark — Application for European Union word mark BRAUWELT — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

18

2016/C 441/23

Case T-776/15: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2016 — Meissen Keramik v EUIPO (MEISSEN KERAMIK) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark MEISSEN KERAMIK — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

19

2016/C 441/24

Case T-662/16: Action brought on 12 September 2016 — Gall Pharma v EUIPO — Pfizer (Styriagra)

19

2016/C 441/25

Case T-667/16 P: Appeal brought on 19 September by Pieter De Meyer and others against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 July 2016 in Case F-113/15 Adriaen a.o. v Commission

20

2016/C 441/26

Case T-668/16 P: Appeal brought on 19 September 2016 by HL against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 July 2016 in Case F-112/15 HL v Commission

22

2016/C 441/27

Case T-681/16: Action brought on 23 September 2016 — Henkel Electronic Materials (Belgium) v Commission

23

2016/C 441/28

Case T-682/16: Action brought on 23 September 2016 — France v Commission

24

2016/C 441/29

Case T-689/16: Action brought on 24 September 2016 — PL v Commission

25

2016/C 441/30

Case T-691/16: Action brought on 26 September 2016 — Elevolution-Engenharia v Commission

26

2016/C 441/31

Case T-692/16: Action brought on 27 September 2016 — CJ v ECDC

26

2016/C 441/32

Case T-693/16 P: Appeal brought on 28 September 2016 by HG against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 19 July 2016 in Case F-149/15, HG v Commission

27

2016/C 441/33

Case T-695/16 P: Appeal brought on 29 September 2016 by the European Commission against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 July 2016 in Case F-104/15, U (*1) v Commission

28

2016/C 441/34

Case T-698/16: Action brought on 23 September 2016 — Trasta Komercbanka a.o. v ECB

29

2016/C 441/35

Case T-702/16 P: Appeal brought on 30 September 2016 José Barroso Truta, Marc Forli, Calogero Galante, Bernard Gradel against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 July 2016 in Case F-126/15, Barroso Truta and Others v Court of Justice

30

2016/C 441/36

Case T-715/16: Action brought on 7 October 2016 — Pebagua v Commission

31

2016/C 441/37

Case T-717/16: Action brought on 4 October 2016 — Waldhausen v EUIPO (Representation of the silhouette of a horse’s head)

31

2016/C 441/38

Case T-719/16: Action brought on 7 October 2016 — Berliner Stadtwerke v EUIPO (berlinWärme)

32

2016/C 441/39

Case T-720/16: Action brought on 10 October 2016 — ARFEA v Commission

32

2016/C 441/40

Case T-724/16 P: Appeal brought on 12 October 2016 by Giorgio Cocchi and Nicola Falcione against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 August 2016 in Case F-134/11, Cocchi and Falcione v Commission

34


(*1)Information erased within the framework of the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data.

 


EN

 

For reasons of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality, some information contained in this issue cannot be disclosed anymore and therefore a new authentic version has been published.

Top