EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CN0341
Case C-341/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 30 April 2019 — MH Müller Handels GmbH v MJ
Case C-341/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 30 April 2019 — MH Müller Handels GmbH v MJ
Case C-341/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 30 April 2019 — MH Müller Handels GmbH v MJ
IO C 255, 29.7.2019, p. 20–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
29.7.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 255/20 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 30 April 2019 — MH Müller Handels GmbH v MJ
(Case C-341/19)
(2019/C 255/29)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Bundesarbeitsgericht
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law: MH Müller Handels GmbH
Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: MJ
Questions referred
1. |
Can established indirect unequal treatment on grounds of religion within the meaning of Article 2(2)(b) of Directive 2000/78/EC, (1) resulting from an internal rule of a private undertaking, be justifiable only if, according to that rule, it is prohibited to wear any visible sign of religious, political or other philosophical beliefs, and not only such signs as are prominent and large-scale? |
2. |
If Question 1 is answered in the negative:
|
3. |
If Questions 2(a) and 2(b) are answered in the negative:
|
(1) Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).