Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022CN0327

    Case C-327/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 16 May 2022 — Centar za restrukturiranje i prodaju v PROM-VIDIJA d.o.o.

    OJ C 424, 7.11.2022, p. 19–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    7.11.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 424/19


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 16 May 2022 — Centar za restrukturiranje i prodaju v PROM-VIDIJA d.o.o.

    (Case C-327/22)

    (2022/C 424/23)

    Language of the case: Croatian

    Referring court

    Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Centar za restrukturiranje i prodaju

    Defendant: PROM-VIDIJA d.o.o.

    Question referred

    Must the rule laid down in Article 121 of the Sudski poslovnik (Rules of Procedure of the Courts and Tribunals) and the directions of the President of the Visoki trgovački sud (Commercial Court of Appeal) … of 20 January 2022, which prohibit the notification of decisions of the judges if they are not fully compliant with the order of treatment set out in those directions, be considered to be consistent with Article 19(1) TEU and with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?


    Top