EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017CN0131
Case C-131/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 13 March 2017 — Hélder José Cunha Martins v Fundo de Garantia Automóvel
Case C-131/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 13 March 2017 — Hélder José Cunha Martins v Fundo de Garantia Automóvel
Case C-131/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 13 March 2017 — Hélder José Cunha Martins v Fundo de Garantia Automóvel
OJ C 168, 29.5.2017, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
29.5.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 168/24 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 13 March 2017 — Hélder José Cunha Martins v Fundo de Garantia Automóvel
(Case C-131/17)
(2017/C 168/32)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Referring court
Tribunal da Relação do Porto
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Hélder José Cunha Martins, [the party against whom enforcement is sought]
Defendant: Fundo de Garantia Automóvel, [the party seeking enforcement]
Questions referred
1. |
In the context of an action for damages arising from a road-traffic accident, must a finding of joint and several liability on appeal by a higher court, without recourse being had to the principle of the immediacy of evidence and without all the grounds of defence being available, be considered to have been made in a fair and equitable hearing, as provided for in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union? |
2. |
Is the attachment of goods in enforcement proceedings, without the action for recovery having been heard beforehand, contrary to Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union? |