This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TA0614
Case T-61/17: Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Bonnafous v EACEA (Civil service — Contract staff — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Normal probationary conditions — Psychological harassment — Principle of sound administration — Duty of care — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Liability)
Case T-61/17: Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Bonnafous v EACEA (Civil service — Contract staff — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Normal probationary conditions — Psychological harassment — Principle of sound administration — Duty of care — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Liability)
Case T-61/17: Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Bonnafous v EACEA (Civil service — Contract staff — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Normal probationary conditions — Psychological harassment — Principle of sound administration — Duty of care — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Liability)
OJ C 255, 29.7.2019, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
29.7.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 255/34 |
Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Bonnafous v EACEA
(Case T-61/17) (1)
(Civil service - Contract staff - Dismissal at the end of the probationary period - Normal probationary conditions - Psychological harassment - Principle of sound administration - Duty of care - Rights of the defence - Right to be heard - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Liability)
(2019/C 255/43)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Laurence Bonnafous (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by S. Rodrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (represented by H. Monet and V. Kasparian, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the dismissal decision of 14 November 2016 and of the decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 2 June 2017, taken by the EACEA, and second, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following those decisions.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Ms Laurence Bonnafous to pay the costs. |