EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CN0272
Case C-272/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de Prud’hommes d’Agen (France) lodged on 21 April 2022 — KH v Keolis Agen SARL
Case C-272/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de Prud’hommes d’Agen (France) lodged on 21 April 2022 — KH v Keolis Agen SARL
Case C-272/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de Prud’hommes d’Agen (France) lodged on 21 April 2022 — KH v Keolis Agen SARL
OJ C 424, 7.11.2022, p. 16–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
7.11.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 424/16 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de Prud’hommes d’Agen (France) lodged on 21 April 2022 — KH v Keolis Agen SARL
(Case C-272/22)
(2022/C 424/18)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Conseil de Prud’hommes d’Agen
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: KH
Defendant: Keolis Agen SARL
Questions referred
|
1. |
Must Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (1) be interpreted as being directly applicable in relations between a private transport operator, with a single public service delegation, and its employees, in the light, in particular, of the liberalisation of the rail passenger transport sector? |
|
2. |
What is a reasonable carry-over period in respect of the acquired entitlement to four weeks’ paid annual leave within the meaning of Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88, in so far as the time during which annual leave may be accrued is one year? |
|
3. |
Is the application of an unlimited carry-over period in the absence of a provision of national law, a regulation or convention governing that period contrary to Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88? |