This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CA0337
Case C-337/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 April 2017 — European Ombudsman v Claire Staelen (Appeal — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Handling by the European Ombudsman of a complaint concerning the management of a list of suitable candidates in an open competition — Breaches of the duty to act diligently — Concept of a ‘sufficiently serious breach’ of a rule of EU law — Non-material damage — Loss of confidence in the office of the European Ombudsman)
Case C-337/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 April 2017 — European Ombudsman v Claire Staelen (Appeal — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Handling by the European Ombudsman of a complaint concerning the management of a list of suitable candidates in an open competition — Breaches of the duty to act diligently — Concept of a ‘sufficiently serious breach’ of a rule of EU law — Non-material damage — Loss of confidence in the office of the European Ombudsman)
Case C-337/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 April 2017 — European Ombudsman v Claire Staelen (Appeal — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Handling by the European Ombudsman of a complaint concerning the management of a list of suitable candidates in an open competition — Breaches of the duty to act diligently — Concept of a ‘sufficiently serious breach’ of a rule of EU law — Non-material damage — Loss of confidence in the office of the European Ombudsman)
OJ C 168, 29.5.2017, p. 8–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.5.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 168/8 |
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 April 2017 — European Ombudsman v Claire Staelen
(Case C-337/15 P) (1)
((Appeal - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Handling by the European Ombudsman of a complaint concerning the management of a list of suitable candidates in an open competition - Breaches of the duty to act diligently - Concept of a ‘sufficiently serious breach’ of a rule of EU law - Non-material damage - Loss of confidence in the office of the European Ombudsman))
(2017/C 168/08)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: European Ombudsman (represented initially by: G. Grill, and subsequently by L. Papadias and P. Dyrberg, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Claire Staelen (represented by: V. Olona, avocate)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Declares the application made by Ms Claire Staelen in her response for the European Ombudsman to be ordered to pay her compensation in the amount of EUR 50 000 inadmissible; |
|
2. |
Sets aside points 1, 3 and 4 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 29 April 2015, Staelen v Ombudsman (T-217/11, EU:T:2015:238); |
|
3. |
Orders the European Ombudsman to pay Ms Claire Staelen compensation in the amount of EUR 7 000; |
|
4. |
Orders Ms Claire Staelen to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Ombudsman in relation to the cross-appeal, dismissed by order of 29 June 2016, Ombudsman v Staelen (C-337/15 P, not published, EU:C:2016:670); |
|
5. |
Orders the European Ombudsman to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Claire Staelen in relation both to the proceedings at first instance and to the main appeal. |