Acest document este un extras de pe site-ul EUR-Lex
Document 62020TA0271
Case T-271/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — JS v SRB (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Time limit for complaints — Admissibility — Psychological harassment — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Rejection of the request — Absence of prima facie evidence — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Liability)
Case T-271/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — JS v SRB (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Time limit for complaints — Admissibility — Psychological harassment — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Rejection of the request — Absence of prima facie evidence — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Liability)
Case T-271/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — JS v SRB (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Time limit for complaints — Admissibility — Psychological harassment — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Rejection of the request — Absence of prima facie evidence — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Liability)
OJ C 7, 9.1.2023, p. 20-21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 7/20 |
Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — JS v SRB
(Case T-271/20) (1)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Time limit for complaints - Admissibility - Psychological harassment - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Rejection of the request - Absence of prima facie evidence - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff - Liability)
(2023/C 7/25)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: JS (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: L. Forestier and H. Ehlers, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 14 June 2019 rejecting his request for assistance submitted on 2 May 2019 and, in so far as necessary, of the decision of the SRB of 23 January 2020 rejecting his complaint against the decision of 14 June 2019 and, second, compensation for the harm which he claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders JS to pay the costs. |