This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008FB0048
Case F-48/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 October 2008 — Ortega Serrano v Commission (Staff case — Manifestly inadmissible — Impossible for applicant to be represented by a lawyer who is not a third party — Legal aid — Application to intervene)
Case F-48/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 October 2008 — Ortega Serrano v Commission (Staff case — Manifestly inadmissible — Impossible for applicant to be represented by a lawyer who is not a third party — Legal aid — Application to intervene)
Case F-48/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 October 2008 — Ortega Serrano v Commission (Staff case — Manifestly inadmissible — Impossible for applicant to be represented by a lawyer who is not a third party — Legal aid — Application to intervene)
OJ C 44, 21.2.2009, p. 73–74
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.2.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 44/73 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 October 2008 — Ortega Serrano v Commission
(Case F-48/08) (1)
(Staff case - Manifestly inadmissible - Impossible for applicant to be represented by a lawyer who is not a third party - Legal aid - Application to intervene)
(2009/C 44/129)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Antonio Ortega Serrano (Cádiz, Spain) (represented by: A. Ortega Serrano, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Herrmann and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)
Re:
Annulment of the Selection Board's decision in competition EPSO/AD/26/05, refusing to enter the applicant in the reserve list, and fixing of a new date for the oral test.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Mr Ortega Serrano's alternative claim, that he should be allowed to put his application in order, is dismissed. |
|
3. |
Mr Ortega Serrano is ordered to pay the costs. |
|
4. |
It is not necessary to rule on the application to intervene. |
|
5. |
The European Data Protection Supervisor is to bear the costs relating to his application to intervene. |
|
6. |
The application for legal aid in Case F-48/08 AJ Ortega Serrano v Commission is dismissed. |
(1) OJ C 171, 5.7.2008, p. 52.