This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007CA0282
Case C-282/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Liège — Belgium) — État belge — SPF Finances v Truck Center SA (Freedom of establishment — Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, following amendment, Article 43 EC) and Article 58 of the EC Treaty (now Article 48 EC) — Free movement of capital — Articles 73b and 73d of the EC Treaty (now Articles 56 EC and 58 EC respectively) — Taxation of legal persons — Income from capital and movable property — Retention of tax at source — Withholding tax — Charging of withholding tax on interest paid to non-resident companies — No charging of withholding tax on interest paid to resident companies — Double taxation convention — Restriction — None)
Case C-282/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Liège — Belgium) — État belge — SPF Finances v Truck Center SA (Freedom of establishment — Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, following amendment, Article 43 EC) and Article 58 of the EC Treaty (now Article 48 EC) — Free movement of capital — Articles 73b and 73d of the EC Treaty (now Articles 56 EC and 58 EC respectively) — Taxation of legal persons — Income from capital and movable property — Retention of tax at source — Withholding tax — Charging of withholding tax on interest paid to non-resident companies — No charging of withholding tax on interest paid to resident companies — Double taxation convention — Restriction — None)
Case C-282/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Liège — Belgium) — État belge — SPF Finances v Truck Center SA (Freedom of establishment — Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, following amendment, Article 43 EC) and Article 58 of the EC Treaty (now Article 48 EC) — Free movement of capital — Articles 73b and 73d of the EC Treaty (now Articles 56 EC and 58 EC respectively) — Taxation of legal persons — Income from capital and movable property — Retention of tax at source — Withholding tax — Charging of withholding tax on interest paid to non-resident companies — No charging of withholding tax on interest paid to resident companies — Double taxation convention — Restriction — None)
OJ C 44, 21.2.2009, p. 12–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.2.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 44/12 |
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Liège — Belgium) — État belge — SPF Finances v Truck Center SA
(Case C-282/07) (1)
(Freedom of establishment - Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, following amendment, Article 43 EC) and Article 58 of the EC Treaty (now Article 48 EC) - Free movement of capital - Articles 73b and 73d of the EC Treaty (now Articles 56 EC and 58 EC respectively) - Taxation of legal persons - Income from capital and movable property - Retention of tax at source - Withholding tax - Charging of withholding tax on interest paid to non-resident companies - No charging of withholding tax on interest paid to resident companies - Double taxation convention - Restriction - None)
(2009/C 44/19)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Cour d'appel de Liège
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: État belge — SPF Finances
Respondent: Truck Center SA
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour d'appel de Liège — Interpretation of Articles 56 EC and 58 EC — Free movement of capital — Taxation of legal persons — Withholding tax deducted by the tax authorities of one Member State on income from capital allocated by a company established in that State to a company established in another Member State — No deduction of withholding tax where that income is allocated to a company established in the same Member State — Unjustified difference in treatment or difference in situation justifying different treatment? — Effect, in that respect, of a bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation
Operative part of the judgment
Articles 52 of the EC Treaty (now, following amendment, Article 43 EC), 58 of the EC Treaty (now Article 48 EC), 73b of the EC Treaty and 73d of the Treaty (now Articles 56 EC and 58 EC respectively) must be interpreted as not precluding tax legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the retention of tax at source on interest paid by a company resident in that Member State to a recipient company resident in another Member State, while exempting from that retention interest paid to a recipient company resident in the first Member State, the income of which is taxed in that Member State by way of corporation tax.