This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62006FA0048
Case F-48/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 November 2008 — Avanzata and Others v Commission (Staff cases — Contractual staff — Classification and remuneration — Persons formerly employed under Luxembourg law)
Case F-48/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 November 2008 — Avanzata and Others v Commission (Staff cases — Contractual staff — Classification and remuneration — Persons formerly employed under Luxembourg law)
Case F-48/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 November 2008 — Avanzata and Others v Commission (Staff cases — Contractual staff — Classification and remuneration — Persons formerly employed under Luxembourg law)
OJ C 44, 21.2.2009, p. 69–69
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 05/11/2008
- Date lodged:
- 05/05/2006
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- French
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
21.2.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 44/69 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 November 2008 — Avanzata and Others v Commission
(Case F-48/06) (1)
(Staff cases - Contractual staff - Classification and remuneration - Persons formerly employed under Luxembourg law)
(2009/C 44/118)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Eric Avanzata (Hussigny, France) and 20 other members of contract staff (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)
Re:
Annulment of the Commission decisions determining the applicants' conditions of appointment, in particular, their function groups, grades, steps and remuneration as laid down in their contracts of employment.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
(1) OJ C 154 of 1.7.2006, p. 26.
